Triggered - Donald Trump Jr - America First in Action, All the Latest News

Sept. 29, 2025 - Triggered - Donald Trump Jr

50:32

America First in Action, All the Latest News | TRIGGERED Ep.278

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hey guys, welcome to another huge episode of Triggered.
	I hope you all had an awesome weekend.
	I am uh coming out of the bush uh in the Yukon had a pretty uh I wanted to show you guys some video, but let's just say a lot of the video is at the bottom of a river, uh, along with a lot of our stuff right now.
	So had a pretty interesting experience.
	I wanted to maybe I'll we'll get into it someday, but uh trying to figure out how to communicate on an iPad without phones, without anything like that right now, a little bit complicated, but uh back in the Yukon, uh back on uh you know at least near relative civilization.
	Uh so uh interesting stories, had a lot more for you, wanted to do an entire episode on it, but uh sadly that SD card is somewhere at the bottom of a river uh in the middle of nowhere.
	Uh a long story, but uh maybe maybe we'll get into that one day.
	Uh maybe throw it in the comments if you're still interested in that.
	I can take you through all of it.
	Um sometime, but back in civilization, uh, and it's time to get back to work.
	There's so much going on right now.
	Uh it's yet another meltdown Monday uh for the Democrats and the media.
	So we're gonna get into all of that right now.
	Uh and I just have to say, uh, it's just so incredible to watch the leftist media just really purposefully ignore the previous four years of Joe Biden using the DOJ and left-wing DAs, you know, their district attorneys all over the place to target my father, his allies, so many of you, just great patriotic Americans, non-stop.
	And then they continue to rewrite history a million different ways.
	But we're gonna get into all of it.
	So it's it's crazy.
	I mean, even major newspapers like the New York Times are publishing some of the most ridiculous, the most ridiculous headlines about all of this as well.
	I mean, they haven't learned a damn thing, obviously, in the past four years, and they're back to their usual ways.
	So we'll show you some of their I'd say it was highlights, but really guys, they're low lights, okay, because they're low life.
	And on top of all of that, Democrats want to shut the government down.
	So they can give you guessed it, folks, more health care to illegals.
	They want to make sure they take care of the illegals, not Americans, not people who are struggling with health care, none of that.
	They want to make sure illegals get health care while diluting our systems while using your money to help them, I mean, it never ends.
	There's a lot more to cover.
	So, guys, remember to keep liking, sharing, subscribing, so we can keep getting this message out, right?
	No one's gonna do it for us, right?
	We've learned that.
	No one's gonna help you, no one's gonna do it.
	We have to do it ourselves.
	So like, share, subscribe, get the message out.
	That matters a lot.
	Remember, you can go to Apple and Spotify if you miss the show here on Rumble.
	Um, if your friends get their podcast that way, make sure they do it.
	Subscribe there, okay?
	Even if you get it here, even if you're a regular, get it there, subscribe, make sure we get the word out.
	Also, check out my news app, MXM News, where you can get the mainstream news without the mainstream bias.
	And of course, don't forget about our incredible sponsors who have the guts to support this program.
	Okay.
	Now, the recent anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles were just one of the hatred, one example really of the hatred and violence ICE agents are dealing with every day.
	They all are out there working hard to enforce our nation's laws.
	They've been ambushed, received death threats, and have been berated by the failing regime media.
	And that's, guys, on top of dealing with violence from cartels and pushback from liberals and sanctuary cities.
	These ICE agents deserve better.
	Okay.
	The Heritage Foundation has created a survey to gauge Americans' support of ICE agents, and they need your participation now.
	So go to Heritage.org slash Don Jr., okay, heritage.org slash D O N Jr to give your opinion on ICE's border enforcement efforts.
	Okay, a couple minutes, five minutes at most is all it takes.
	Complete the survey today at heritage.org slash Don Jr. and make your voice heard.
	Also, guys, don't forget about our great friends over at the Birch Gold Group.
	When inflation jumps, when you hear the national debt is over 37 trillion dollars, do you ever think maybe now, I don't know, maybe now would be a good time to buy some gold, whether as a hedge against inflation, peace of mind during global instability, or just for sensible diversification, Birch Gold Group believes every American should own physical, right?
	Like in your hands, physical gold.
	And so they created something special.
	Until September 30th, that's tomorrow, guys.
	Until September 30th, if you're a first-time gold buyer, Birch Gold is offering a rebate of up to 10,000 in free medals on qualifying purchases.
	To claim eligibility and start the process, request an info kit now.
	Just text Don Jr.
	D-O-N-J-R to the number 989898.
	Again, that's Don Jr.
	D-O-N-J-R to the number 989898.
	All you gotta do is text it.
	Okay, text it, put in the number 989898, put in Don Jr., they'll send you the info kit that you need.
	Just get the information, educate yourselves.
	Sounds like a great one.
	Great way to check it out.
	Diversify your portfolio.
	Just look, educate yourself.
	What do you have to lose?
	That aspect of it's all free.
	So check it out.
	With that, guys, let's get into all of the top headlines.
	And I actually want to begin with some big news late last night.
	The January 6th pipe bomb mystery.
	Remember, we've talked about that extensively with Darren Beattie.
	Like, how did a pipe bomb at the DNC and the RNC just how does a story like that just magically disappear?
	Okay.
	So the pipe bomb mystery, there's some new things out there.
	Because we now have documents, new documents, and new witness interviews that raise even more questions about just how big of a cover-up and a hoax this all really was.
	Remember, we've talked about this extensively.
	I said, like, the fact that that story could just disappear, to me, sounds like it was just a backup plan if they didn't get what they wanted From the rest of January 6th, right?
	If they didn't get sort of the fake insurrection, if they didn't get those things, huh?
	The pipe bomb wouldn't have just disappeared.
	That would have been their excuse to do all of the things that they did to violate all of so many Americans' rights, uh, to create this sort of martial law that they clearly did for all these people in DC who got no due process or anything.
	But now a newly declassified FBI lab report that was never even used the word viable to describe either bomb.
	Both devices never exploded and were discovered about 16 hours after, 16 hours after the FBI claimed they were planted outside both major party headquarters.
	So discovered 16 hours later, with all of that security, with all of the bombs that it does, with all of the this, like they never used the word viable.
	That's strange.
	Like it's almost like it was a fake bomb.
	And here's where it gets interesting, guys.
	According to newly released witness testimony from the worker who claimed to have found the device at the RNC.
	Okay, she told investigators, quote, I can confirm that the device must have been placed between 12 p.m. and 1240 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
	Because it was not present when I went down to the area to start laundry at around 12 p.m.
	But it was present when I returned to continue laundry at around 1240.
	But her claims raised questions about the discrepancy between the witness's timeline and the security footage obtained and released by the FBI.
	That footage shows that a suspect planted a bomb.
	So use that in arrow quotes in an alley outside the RNC building at approximately 8.16 p.m. on the night of January 5th.
	How's that possible?
	It wasn't there at 12, but was there at 816, but then it was there again at 1240?
	Here's a flashback on what we've learned so far.
	Check this out.
	We are, we're already looking into it.
	Uh, you know, it always confused me is with all the FBI resources that were suddenly and almost immediately put on prosecuting anybody who happened to be around the Capitol.
	Look, there was violence done.
	I'm not denying that.
	But the number of people who charges were brought up against, or they were they were harassed or investigated by federal authorities so quickly.
	How did how was the FBI able to put that many resources on that?
	But yet that it doesn't seem that they did much of an investigation into the pipe bomb.
	And so we're looking, we're we're now reaching out to the FBI.
	They are being very cooperative, uh, looking for all information they had.
	Uh, why was the investigation dropped?
	Why didn't it go any further?
	And uh, you know, looking at some specifics like when were the pipe bombs actually placed?
	Where were they live?
	And how, if there was a live pipe bomb that, according to the FBI did have some black powder on it, especially the one over at the Democrat headquarters.
	How was a Secret Service agent able to walk past it five times without his bomb-sniffing dog alerting on it?
	And then why were people, citizens just allowed to walk within feet of the pipe bomb while it was supposedly still active?
	There this is the probably one of the most suspicious and uh disorganized things I have ever seen out of law enforcement.
	And uh I think American people need to know the answers to that.
	Yeah.
	So you um said that you want to know if anyone was there to instigate.
	Do you have a growing suspicion that maybe some of the people there that day were there to make the situation worse, not better?
	You know that we do have evidence that there were people that were instigating, such as a metropolitan police officer uh that was undercover uh in plain clothes.
	Um the question would be when we get more evidence of people who are instigating that may be part of the government or maybe in law enforcement, were they caught up in the moment, or did they have orders to do this?
	Was this pre-planned, or is it just something that somebody uh decided, you know it would be really good if we could catch catch some of these MAGA people uh rioting at the end of 2020, right?
	Um, not necessarily thinking they're gonna get into the Capitol, but maybe, and this is you know, one theory we're working on, as we're working on several theories is was this just allowed to play out for political reasons.
	So we're we're researching the entire gambit.
	We're gonna follow the facts and draw our conclusions from facts, not just from political expediency, because America has already been through that with the original uh select committee.
	They sure were.
	Uh Mr. Chairman, we've had many conversations with you about the one-sided nature of that first January 6th committee.
	Um, I imagine that's not going to be the case this time around.
	Tell us who all is going to be on that committee.
	Well, I think we've got an A team of people.
	Uh, we have Morgan Griffith, who was on the uh committee in the last Congress with me, an attorney out of Virginia.
	He's a great guy, very smart, knows the law very well, and he he he was invaluable to me in the last committee.
	He sat down and read through transcribed interviews that we were able to obtain from uh these different agencies.
	I mean, this is a committee where we're just relying on staff to do the work.
	We were we were locked in doing the work ourselves.
	Um we also have uh Troy Nels, uh, former law enforcement on the Judiciary Committee.
	He's even written a book about January 6th, so he brings a lot of knowledge in.
	Harriet Hagman, uh from uh uh the great state of Wyoming is another attorney that's joining us, and then my good friend from Louisiana, Clay Higgins, also with law enforcement experience.
	And so uh all of them have a keen interest in getting to the truth, and they bring a whole lot to the table.
	And I'm really excited about this committee and uh what I believe we'll be able to get done.
	Guys, it's yet another interesting mystery uh in a timeline that has never quite added up or made any sense.
	And why we can't track down a suspect who was caught on tape several times in DC, around the most secure areas there at the headquarters of both of the biggest the two real political parties in America.
	But yet everyone else, anywhere near the Capitol on January 6th, ended up being targeted by the Biden DH.
	If you were present, they used facial recognition to track you down.
	If you had a cell phone ping, if you had a bank account transaction anywhere there, they found everyone.
	And they couldn't find these guys at next to the most secure places anywhere in the world.
	Those are the only two people they couldn't find, or the only person if it was one person doing both.
	It's the only one they couldn't figure out.
	Of all of the thousands of people they tracked down, your grandmother who happened to take a selfie video, they tracked her down in the middle of nowhere.
	But these people they couldn't find.
	Now add that to findings from last week about the 274 plain clothes officers being sent to the Capitol as the riot unfolded.
	A decision from Christopher Ray, then leader of the FBI that actually went against FBI protocols.
	Shocking.
	I'm shocked to hear they would break their own rules.
	Shop.
	Again, it's almost like it was all a setup and all BS to begin with.
	Of course, we know it all was.
	So we need to get to the bottom of all of this because all of the hoaxes and corruption needs to be exposed.
	And guys, speaking of corruption, James Comey and his media enablers are continuing to lash out after last week's indictment for lying to Congress and obstruction.
	Okay.
	Remember, that's what they wanted to try to get me on.
	Okay, they made me do 50 hours of congressional testimony about nonsense, about a hoax they made up in the hopes that I would lie under Congress.
	Now, they didn't know what they want because even in 50 hours of them asking me the same questions over again, I just told them the truth.
	It's that simple.
	Comey did not.
	Okay.
	For example, a headline from the New York Times reads, quote, in going after his foes, Trump's set a precedent that could haunt his allies.
	Huh.
	Haunted Alice.
	It's interesting.
	Trump's setting the precedent.
	It wasn't four years of them trying to find anything on us, jailing Peter Navarro, jailing Steve Bannon, trying to jail me, my father, anyone around there actually jailing so many people who were peaceful people at January 6th, right?
	No, no, no, no.
	Now it's a dangerous president, right?
	Not what they did for years, not what they actually did, not when they created nonsense, not when they lied about what people did and did it anyway.
	But when someone actually wanted before Congress and you actually treat them this way, as it should be, because they broke the law.
	Now it's a dangerous president.
	Remember, guys, Democrat prosecutors literally invented, invented new legal fictions to go after my father, right?
	They they changed the laws in New York State.
	They changed the statute of limitations for one year so they could go after him on anything that they couldn't otherwise have touched on them.
	You know, and that seems to me to be a dangerous president.
	They did all of it.
	Comey is being prosecuted over his own words in a public setting where his own deputies have said that he authorized leaks to the media.
	Comey lied under oath.
	It's that simple.
	It's very binary.
	Here's JD's answer over the weekend with a summary of the case.
	So I want to start with this.
	Um, President Trump has said that the indictment of James Comey is is justice, not revenge.
	There is pushback to that, of course, among Democrats, including Senator Tim Kane, who is calling it a complete political hatchet job.
	The president has said, quote, there will be others, and in the past he has listed Adam Schiff and Letitia James.
	Do you think there are more indictments coming?
	And do you think that's justified?
	Well, there's certainly going to be more indictments coming over the next three and a half years of the Trump administration, but we're always going to let the law drive this stuff and the facts of the case and not political motivations, which frankly makes us so much different from the Biden administration, where they indicted not just the president of the United States, but so many people who were just engaged in the basic job of politics, who were engaged in policymaking, who disagreed with the Biden administration, and because that they faced prosecution from that same administration.
	If you look at the Comey indictment, Martha, this was a grand jury indictment delivered in Alexandria, Virginia, not exactly a hotbed of Donald Trump's political support.
	There were three request requested indictments.
	The grand jury returned two of those three indictments.
	So I think they showed they were judicious.
	I think that it showed clearly that there were a couple of things that James Comey did wrong.
	And to the people who are saying that this is all political, I mean, look, if you look at our track record in the Trump administration, there have been people who have been prosecuted who have been political allies who agree with our politics.
	There have been people who disagree with our politics.
	We're not letting politics drive this.
	We're letting the requirements of the justice system and the law drive this.
	And unfortunately for James Comey, when I look at this indictment, I see a guy who lied under oath.
	And he'll have his day in court, he'll have his his opportunity to prove the other case in front of the jury.
	But uh the idea that this is driven by politics, I think it's preposterous when you actually read the details of the indictment and the obvious fact that James Comey did lie under oath to Congress multiple times.
	All right, well, guys, over at CNN, they are calling it a quote, revenge tour.
	It's a revenge tour, folks.
	Uh, you know, they can do this through Trump, but if he literally holds even their same standards but just follows the basic law, it's a revenge tour.
	It's an abuse of power.
	It wasn't for years.
	Remember, no, no, they it wasn't when they're going after Trump, when they're going after conservatives, when they're going after great patriotic Americans, when they're trying to take his businesses and billions of dollars, when they're trying to jail people, when they hold people without due process for years uh in a prison just because they know in a DC they're never gonna get a favorable jury.
	You know, that's not an abuse of power, but now it's now it's different, right?
	But the good news is Scott Jennings was there at CNN to set the record straight.
	Uh, as usual, even though it's Scott, usually, you know, four on one uh over at CNN.
	Uh I think he does a good job.
	Check this out.
	He seems to be kneecapping his own prosecutors here.
	Well, look, that's the thing.
	There's a system, and uh the system includes grand juries and juries of uh ordinary Americans who get in a room and make decisions.
	He can't order people to be indicted, and he can't order people To be convicted, he can express his opinion.
	In the case of Comey, grand jurors in a very liberal jurisdiction got together and decided that the evidence did warrant charges.
	Comey will go to trial and then a jury of his peers will decide whether he is guilty or not.
	The president can't do anything about that.
	He can make commentary on it.
	I'm not sure if it's wise or not wise to do that or if it will matter at all.
	But ultimately, I'll just say what Jim Comey said when Donald Trump was indicted.
	It's a good day for the rule of law because we have a system and the system is in place and the system is working as it was designed with average ordinary Americans making decisions about how our laws will be enforced.
	But you know, you said that he can't actually order the indictment of someone.
	I think he just proved that he could.
	I think what he did, the series of events that took place here.
	We have to actually be clear about what happened, right?
	He tried to pressure Eric Siebert at the Eastern District of Virginia to pursue this prosecution.
	He did not.
	The U.S. prosecutors there said they did not see enough evidence.
	So he forces him out.
	He publicly declares to Pam Bondi, you need to target these political enemies, specifically labeling James Comey.
	And then, right after that, installs Lindsay Halligan, a former insurance lawyer with no prosecutorial experience to go in there, and then within days, Comey's indicted even after Rankin Frau prosecutors stayed, they gave her a declination memo that said this is why we don't think there's enough evidence.
	So I don't think this is just the process playing out.
	I think this is Donald Trump explicitly abusing his power and directing the prosecution of a political enemy.
	You said we have to be very clear about what happened.
	And then you left out the most critical part where a prosecutor has to go into a grand jury, present the evidence, and make the case why charges are warranted.
	And the grand jury has to agree with that.
	In this case, they did.
	Now, I don't know if he'll be convicted or not, but you can't leave out and deny that there's a critical step where average ordinary Americans get put in a room and they ultimately have to decide does a case go or does it not go?
	And then they will decide whether you're guilty or whether you're not guilty.
	That is an important part of the process that he cannot really alter or change.
	Sadly, this is what we've come to expect from the regime media, because even amid all of the left-wing violence, major news outlets are still out attacking conservatives.
	They're attacking Turning Point, they're attacking Charlie.
	Uh they're going after it doesn't stop.
	Right?
	Rules for thee, but not for me.
	That's the Democrat way.
	In New York magazine this weekend, they went after Charlie Kirk tribute event for quote the mainstreaming of formerly extremist views.
	You know, extremist views like believe in God family country.
	Like, you know, have kids, raise a good family.
	Like men aren't women.
	You know, all these extreme formerly extremists.
	I mean, you can't make this crap up, folks.
	Extremists?
	Which parts are exactly extremists, guys?
	I don't know.
	Again, start a family, be strong in your faith, secure the border, don't do drugs, don't indoctrinate kids.
	Which part of this is extremist exactly.
	It seems like that would be pretty normal thinking for literally the entire history of human civilization until we get to the actual extremist views of today's Democrat Party.
	This is what they think.
	This is how far gone they are.
	There's no helping them at this point.
	They're fully nuts.
	The good news is, though, that common sense Americans have woken up more than ever.
	Especially young people.
	The young people who are going to inherit the nonsense and the insanity of the Democrats.
	No, I can stop right now.
	I'll be fine.
	Okay.
	It's the young people, that generation.
	They're the ones that are screwed if this nonsense continues.
	Here was the scene this weekend in state college, ahead of the Penn State Oregon game, where the line was a mile long to get a freedom t-shirt before the game.
	Remember that shirt?
	That's the shirt Charlie was wearing when he was killed.
	When he was assassinated by a deranged leftist.
	Okay.
	Remember.
	The media was very clear to point out, you know, well, the shooter isn't trans.
	No, but his boyfriend is.
	Okay?
	You know, minor details.
	Okay.
	Watch this line at Penn State.
	Why, in the early hours, when we know nothing, do they suggest there's a right wing motive?
	Why?
	Well, Cayley, because they're liars, but the American people know the truth and they know it right here at Penn State Beaver Stadium behind us.
	Charlie Kirk was going to go to this game, watch his beloved Oregon Ducks play undefeated Penn State today because we are Charlie.
	And Penn State has shown up today.
	Look at these Charlie Kirk.
	Look at this.
	Kaylee, that energy is alive.
	It is electric here today.
	We're registering voters with the incredible voter registration teams here for Turning Point USA and early vote action.
	Scott Pressler with us.
	They're already signing up.
	New young voters in Charlie's honor.
	Charlie's spirit lives alive here in the kinetic energy of this moment.
	It's a spiritual moment, it's an awakening, and it's a revival here in America.
	Can you feel it?
	Ladies and gentlemen of Penn State, can I get an amen?
	Benny, I I sit here and this almost brings tears to my eyes.
	Um because we have had such a national heaviness in this country for more than two weeks.
	And to see that this movement lives on in the positive nature of it.
	You said it's a revival.
	What are you hearing from these students wearing the same shirt Charlie Kirk was?
	Yes.
	Yes, so the goal was to make students scared.
	The goal of evil always is to shut down the voices of those speaking truth.
	That is where Christian martyrdom comes from.
	Christian martyrdom comes from people speaking truth about our faith, about our country, about our nation.
	That's what Charlie was doing.
	That's why Charlie was a Christian martyr.
	And evil intended to silence that voice.
	But the way that God works, well, ladies and gentlemen, what man intends for evil, God intends for good.
	And what you've done is made tens of millions of Charlie Kirk.
	And freely here at Penn State Cayley, the line was a mile long.
	We just posted on social media.
	People have been out here since 6 a.m. waiting to wear a Charlie Kirk Freedom shirt.
	This is the single biggest backfire in history, and it's how God works.
	You strike Charlie down, you'll just make his message stronger.
	And the moral and good people of America know that and we are ready to take up the charge.
	Benny, someone told me that if you were the preacher at their church, they would go to that church.
	Benny, I love having you sit here and preach to me.
	But a little bit of football here, both these simple Christians.
	Simple Christians.
	That's a great thing.
	A little football here because Charlie loved the Oregon Ducks, and they're undefeated.
	And look, I love Penn State, but I look for the Oregon Ducks today.
	Charlie Kirk's team has got to win.
	Thank you.
	Kaylee, the reason why we're out here giving away 5,000 Charlie Kirk Freedom shirts.
	And I think I think they might be all gone already.
	I think they were gone at 5 a.m. is because it's a whiteout here at Penn State.
	Penn State has one of Beaver Stadium right behind us, beautiful stadium, one of the largest in the world.
	A hundred thousand person capacity.
	They'll all be wearing white.
	And so we are going to pack that student section tonight, the game of the week.
	Sports center is here.
	Everyone's here.
	Game of the week.
	We want those cameras to show a hundred million viewers around the world, the Charlie Kirk Freedom shirt.
	It'll be all over the stadium.
	It'll be all over today.
	And so we will be standing proud.
	Now, would Charlie Kirk be cheering for Penn State?
	Let me tell you about my friend Charlie Kirk.
	He loved, he loved the Oregon Ducks, and Oregon's done an incredible job honoring Charlie, but he also loved Penn State.
	Charlie Kirk loved Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania delivered for Donald Trump in the election.
	Right?
	We are in a red state.
	A red state here in Pennsylvania.
	That's well said.
	You know, Betty Johnson, I'm an SEC girl, but today I am an Oregon Ducks fan, and I'm glad to hear you like Penn State too.
	Thank you, Benny.
	What an awesome time to have you.
	And by the way, speaking of extremist views, the New York Times really has no room to talk here.
	I feel like they've seated the moral high ground on extremist views, and they have for quite some time now.
	Because over the weekend, they sent a reporter down to Caracas, Venezuela, to get some exclusive interviews with members of the Maduro regime who told them that drugs aren't really a problem, and it's illegal to blow up drug boats.
	I'm not even making this up.
	Drugs aren't a problem, guys.
	Yeah, you know, if I'm a drug dealer, I'd tell you that drugs aren't really a problem.
	I'd be like, you know what?
	It should be illegal to blow up our drug boats and the millions that we're doing while killing Americans with fentanyl and the scourge that it creates.
	Like, you know, this is what the Times does.
	They interview the drug dealers there who are making millions killing our children and our citizens.
	And they're like, oh no, they're not really, it's not really that much of a problem.
	I mean, the Times ran with this.
	They're doing this with a straight face, guys.
	The Times did an entire piece basically about how it's bad to blow up drug boats, and did so by cozying up to one of the world's worst regimes on earth, okay.
	A literally a dictatorial oppressive regime.
	And the New York Times is doing like their PR.
	They're doing their it they're marketing for them.
	Why?
	Because they're obsessed with finding any reason to attack my father, even if it means doing puff pieces on America's enemies.
	Okay.
	These people are freaking insane.
	Remember, if my father came up with the cure for cancer, it would be bad.
	If he takes out the scourge of fentanyl, it would be bad.
	These are 90 issues, probably 99.9 to point one issues.
	Okay.
	The point one being the leaders of the Democrat Party, the insane people in the regime media.
	Those are the people taking that side.
	And they can't help but do it because anything Trump does, they have to do the opposite.
	Of course, my father has made it very clear that we aren't tolerating narco-terrorism in our hemisphere any longer.
	And we're not going to get bogged down in endless Middle East wars while letting our backyard crumble.
	Those days are over.
	Check out my father on the narco-terrorist.
	Narco-trafficking and related criminal activity is a clear and present danger to us all.
	The United States, under President Trump's leadership, has taken bold, decisive action to protect our own citizens and to support our regional neighbors in battling the storage.
	So far this year, the United States has designated 13 of these organizations for what they are.
	Terrorist organizations.
	Such organizations torture, maim, mutilate, and murder with impunity.
	They're the enemies of all humanity.
	So we are meeting to figure out how we can work collectively to keep you safe, to stop these organizations, to dismantle them so that we can stop the drug flow, stop the arm clothes, stop the illegal immigration that these organizations are pushing.
	And I have to give credit to Senator John Fetterman, okay, who may be one of the only sane Democrats left.
	I don't know if it was the brain aneurysm or whatever it was.
	Like maybe it made him actually sane for a while.
	And you know, maybe after an election he'll go back to his old ways.
	I don't know.
	But one of the only guys out there actually having common sense on the entire Democrat Party and for not going along with all of the far-left lunacy.
	It's hard to believe that it takes perhaps a brain aneurysm for a radical Democrat to actually be like, oh wow, we are insane.
	This is nuts, and we need some common sense.
	Check out John Fetterman.
	Uh, all the way.
	But I mean, on the left, you've got such extremes.
	Would you consider switching parties?
	No, no, I'm I'm I'm not going to switch.
	You know, but I'm just going to be an independent voice in the Democratic Party.
	I'm not going to be afraid if people, I mean, and if there are groups attacking a Democrat, you know, the last one in Pennsylvania, then that's to me that's part of the problem, you know, in our party.
	And if you want a Democrat that's going to call people Nazis or fascists or all these kinds of things, well, I'm not going to be that guy.
	You know, independent thinking and views wherever I happen to believe the truth, regardless if it's the Republican or the Democratic voice.
	You know, what I think is the truth in this.
	Now, in this truth right now, it's firmly on Israel through this.
	And it's also it's always wrong to shut our government down.
	And that's where my voice is.
	And if that puts me as an outlier, and now that's where I am.
	Of course, the Democrats aren't doing their annual government shutdown theater ahead of tomorrow's uh funding deadline.
	Okay, they're doing their usual stuff, and they're gonna use it to try to get whatever they need, and they gotta make sure they push the you know the point one issues.
	Uh so they're doing their theater.
	Uh now, just to be clear though, the current CR on the table keeps the government funded at the same levels currently.
	But Democrats can't help but try to use this moment and get more funding for their far-left pet projects.
	Here's the latest from the White House.
	Check this out.
	Let me be very clear about the president and the White House's position.
	All we are asking for is a common sense, clean funding resolution, a continuing resolution to keep the government open.
	This is a bill that keeps the government funded at the exact same levels as today, just adjusted for inflation.
	So there is zero good reason for the Democrats to vote against this, especially when the Democrats have voted for this 13 previous times, as recently as March.
	And so this is the reasonable and common sense thing to do.
	The president is giving Democrat leadership one last chance to be reasonable to come to the White House today to try to talk about this.
	And now is not the time to try to get political points against Donald Trump.
	Now is the time to do right by the American people and keep the government funded.
	Our most vulnerable in our society and our country will be impacted by a government shutdown.
	Everybody knows this, and that's why Republicans and the president want to keep the government open, and we welcome Democrats to join us in that effort.
	To be clear, the government never actually shuts down, but it does create headaches and make it more difficult to get things done.
	In fact, Democrats are the ones always claiming that government shutdowns are the worst thing we could ever do.
	But don't believe me, here they are in their own words.
	Here's the exact hypocrisy.
	Again, if they do it, it's okay because it's for purpose.
	If anyone else does it, it's expected democracy.
	You know, the usual crap.
	Listen to them.
	In their own words.
	It's really simple.
	To hold these people hostage instead of just letting them do their jobs, which they want to do while we work out our differences.
	So wrong.
	This is democracy.
	And in a democracy, hostage tactics are the last resort for those who can't win their fights through elections, can't win their fights in Congress, can't win their fights for the presidency, and can't win their fights in the court.
	A government shutdown of any duration would harm hardworking Americans and our economy.
	Why should we ask TSA officers to go without their hard-earned pay while they protect our airports?
	I'm a senator from Virginia.
	Some of the hardest effects of shutdown will be seen in my state.
	If the government shuts down, it will be average Americans who suffer most.
	Some who right now are trying to figure out how they're going to pay rent, how they're going to make mortgage payments, how they're going to keep college payments going, how they're going to keep the lights on, how they're going to keep food on the table.
	Had the government shut down hundreds of thousands of people would have not gotten their paychecks.
	Our military won't get paid.
	Head start teachers won't get paid.
	Our wildfire fighters won't get paid.
	A government shutdown means seniors who rely on social security could be thrown into chaos.
	Our veterans could see regional VA offices shut down and support services put on hold.
	Shutdowns are not good for the economy.
	Shutdowns cost taxpayers billions of dollars per week.
	Shutdowns cost the economy billions of dollars.
	They cost businesses money.
	Families who benefit from WIC and other nutrition programs could see benefits halted.
	If this shutdown continues indefinitely, 39 million Americans will risk not having enough food.
	They will lose their snap benefits in February.
	So that means American children will be going to bed hungry.
	It's unacceptable.
	The longer that this shutdown goes on, the more Americans it will be affected.
	Critical services and our economy are being threatened with poison pill partisanship.
	Shutting down the government should not be a negotiating tactic.
	A last gasp of those who cannot cope with the realities of our democracy.
	Now some of the same groups behind the antifa protests and the radical Marxist insanity are also the ones spearheading a pressure campaign to push Democratic senators to vote against funding the government and to force a partial shutdown.
	One example of that, one group pushing all of this insanity is called the Indivisible Project.
	They've received a total of 7.6 million dollars in grants from the Soros Open Society Foundations in recent years, okay?
	Which is why it's so critical to investigate and expose the funding network behind all of the left-wing violence, the dirty tricks, and the shady accounting.
	I mean, they got almost seven million dollars from Soros.
	The indivisible society, ah, sounds great.
	It's all crap.
	Okay.
	No more.
	And on that same note, guys, I thought we would close with some poetic justice, where anti-ICE protesters in Massachusetts forgot.
	This is funny.
	An anti-ICE uh protester in mass forgot to put her car in park while yelling at agents making arrest.
	And then this happened.
	Let's just say karma is a bitch.
	Well, that sucks.
	Let's put it up.
	Let's put it up.
	Look at this.
	Lucy.
	their car got lost Look at this.
	Lucy.
	Her car got lost.
	I also want to make sure we show some video of what's going on up in the Pacific Northwest.
	Uh, and maybe we'll play some of that as well.
	Because what's happening up in Portland, uh, kind of a big deal.
	We should be watching, but we're gonna fix all of these problems and stop the insanity.
	So check this out.
	music
	Die, die, die.
	Like New York, when people are outraged like DC when people are outraged that you actually do something about these things.
	You know what?
	Turns out that people actually want safety in their streets.
	Even those who aren't Republicans.
	They want to be able to walk to the grocery stores into their cars without getting carjacked or shot or killed.
	I mean you know minor things like that.
	They actually want those things.
	So maybe we gotta do a little bit more in all of these leftist cities.
	So guys thanks so much for tuning in please like share subscribe okay check out our incredible sponsors down below and in the video description support them.
	It makes a big deal download the Rumble app.
	Check us out on iTunes on Spotify podcast if you get your podcast that way if your friends get their pot their podcast that way it's a really big deal.
	It's very important so I want to thank you guys for that but do it.
	Just like share subscribe it's so easy.
	If you're watching right now hit it now share it to 10 of your friends right now.

▲