All Episodes
Previous Next
June 12, 2025 - Triggered - Donald Trump Jr
49:57
Law & Disorder: The Destructive Dem Agenda, Interview with Mike Davis | TRIGGERED Ep.249
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Guys, welcome to another huge episode of Triggered.
Today, your favorite lawyer and the swamp's worst nightmare, Mike Davis.
Mike always jokes that he could never be confirmed in the Senate.
That's probably true.
He may get the obligatory vote from his old boss, Chuck Grassley.
But that's probably about it, even from the Republicans.
But instead, he demolishes the Democrat agenda from the outside.
Day after day.
So this is going to be an awesome episode.
You're going to want to see it.
Make sure you guys are hitting the like button.
Make sure you're sharing, subscribing, so we can keep getting this message out.
Remember, if you missed the show here on Rumble, you can catch it on Apple.
You can get it on Spotify.
If your friends get their podcasts that way, make sure that they're aware.
You guys, by pushing it, you're on the front lines of this movement.
Make sure we do it.
Also, guys, for all the top headlines we cover, Here on the show, go over to my news app, MXM News, like minute by minute, where you can get the mainstream news without the mainstream bias.
And of course, be sure to check out our great sponsors who have the guts to support this program.
And speaking of which, guys, don't forget about All Family Pharmacy.
You've seen how hard it can be to access important medications like ivermectin.
And it's critical to have on hand these kind of medications for any emergency and to be prepared in a time of crisis.
That's why I want to tell you about All Family Pharmacy.
They're cutting through the nonsense and make it easy to get hard-to-find medications when you need them most.
They'll provide the prescription, no hoops to jump through, no waiting rooms, no hassle, and they deliver it right to your door.
All Family Pharmacy even lets you order in bulk so you can stay ahead of the curve.
Head over to allfamilypharmacy.com slash Don Jr., D-O-N-J-R, for 10% off your first order.
That's allfamilypharmacy.com slash Don Jr.
Don't forget and check them out.
Henry Repeating Arms.
They're family-owned, made in the U.S., and they make a line of lever-action rifles, shotguns, revolvers that can't be beat.
American-made or nothing.
Their products have a lifetime guarantee.
All done with first-class customer service.
There's options and solutions for everyone and every reason, including hunters, outdoorsmen, home and land defense, women, youth, and even collectors.
I have a bunch of them.
My kids grew up shooting a bunch of the Henry Lever 22s.
Just awesome stuff.
And this is a company that shares your values.
Giving back to our military veterans, first responders, and organizations that support our Second Amendment rights.
So visit henryusa.com and order their free catalog.
Just go to henryusa.com and click on free catalog.
Pretty simple.
You'll be glad you did.
You support a great American company that believes what we believe in.
And you'll have a good time in the process.
So, guys, joining me now, your favorite lawyer, MAGA's favorite lawyer, The Swamp's almost certainly least favorite lawyer, I would have to say, Article 3 Project founder.
Mike Davis.
What's happening, buddy?
Good to have you back.
Thanks for having me back on, Don.
Man, there is a lot going on, but Mike, let's start off with what seems like really a judicial coup.
We've seen it across D.C. Now we're seeing it in Boulder, Colorado.
What the heck is going on with these judges issuing all these temporary restraining orders and saying essentially the executive branch can't do anything?
They can't deport.
They can't do anything.
Give us the facts.
Yeah, President Trump campaigned on the fact that he is going to hire Elon Musk.
He's going to set up the Department of Government Efficiency.
He's going to cut government waste, fraud, and abuse.
He's going to secure our border, and he's going to expel illegal aliens, starting with dangerous foreign terrorists like Tren de Aragua and other Islamist fascists in the Middle East who are killing.
American Jews and lighting them on fire.
And the American people like what they heard, and they gave President Trump an overwhelming electoral mandate.
312 electoral votes, all seven swing states, the popular vote.
He kept the The American people are firmly behind President Trump, and President Trump is exercising core article to power as the President of the United States.
He is taking care that our laws are faithfully executed, including cutting waste, fraud, and abuse.
As the Commander-in-Chief, he's expelling foreign terrorists, right?
These are his constitutional powers.
It's his constitutional rights.
He is exercising Article II power.
And these Democrats, these plaintiffs, these attorneys, these judges are not exercising judicial review.
This is judicial.
They don't like how the American people voted on November 5th, and so they're trying to overturn The will of the American people.
And this is a big test for Chief Justice John Roberts and the Supreme Court.
The federal judiciary's legitimacy is on the line.
And when the federal judiciary loses its legitimacy with a broad swath of the American people, it loses everything.
It does not have an army to enforce its orders.
Yeah, I mean, let's talk about that, right?
You obviously have, what is it, like 650 of these federal judges.
Each one of these cases always sort of falls into the lap of an Obama appointee or a Biden appointee.
I mean, I know, and I think you were involved the last time around, getting so many judges in there.
It does not seem like it's ever a coincidence that any one of these sensitive, even common sense cases, right?
Who wouldn't want to get rid of illegal, murderous, drug-dealing criminals?
How do they always fall in the lap?
You know, these things are supposed to be a blind pool and all this stuff, but it never really works out that way.
Why is that?
Yeah, because you have these activist plaintiffs and attorneys going to these activist judges.
And it's amazing.
People like Jeb Bosberg, this D.C. He just magically appears on these cases, like Tanya Shutkin magically appears on these Trump cases.
Maybe they're drawing judges out of the anti-Trump, Trump derangement syndrome lottery pool, because it doesn't seem like President Trump ever gets a fair judge.
And this is the broader point to the Chief Justice of the United States, John Roberts.
If you do not get your judicial house in order, And the Article III project is working with Congress right now to do that, including the Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley.
My former boss, along with other key members of the House and Senate, to rein in these activist judges.
And so if the chief justice is not going to do it, if they're going to allow these judges to sabotage the president and the presidency, this is so much bigger than Trump, that Congress is going to have to step in with jurisdiction stripping, with funding cuts.
With eliminating courts, eliminating judgeships, this is a very perilous path that the federal judiciary is heading down, and John Roberts is allowing this to happen.
Why the hell should the President of the United States have to get permission from each and every one of these 650?
District court judges around the country before he can do his job.
That is not how our Constitution works.
It's not what the American people voted for.
And if John Roberts does not fix this, again, Congress will fix it for him, and it's not going to be pretty.
So, listen, I agree with you in concept.
Will Congress actually do these things?
You know, just like, you know, the Supreme Court's supposed to do some things that are supposed to be common sense, and I'm seeing even, you know, they, well, you know.
I don't know.
There's a couple of conservatives, but not that many, even on the right-leaning side.
You see some of the decisions that there are.
I'm not a student of law, although I guess I play one on TV these days, given how much time I've spent being subpoenaed and in courtrooms and all of this nonsense as of late.
I'm probably more qualified than most.
That doesn't seem to be happening.
And then you have sort of the lackluster rhino Republicans that'll prevent these things from happening.
I mean, everyone just seems to be tapping the ball.
Will Congress actually act, in your opinion?
Do you have to go to a vote of Congress and then you have to win a three-seat majority and some guy in a purple district then says, well, I'm just not going to do this because it's a little harder to get reelected because, you know, the Democrats in my district are all for this kind of lawfare?
Well, let me just tell you how it works before.
John Roberts' attention.
So let me give you an example.
I was the chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee for then-chairman and now-chairman Chuck Grassley, and I had the oversight portfolio for the federal judiciary.
If you just threaten to have oversight of the federal judiciary, you get John Roberts' attention.
And I like John Roberts.
I worked on his nomination when I was in the White House before.
Clerks on the Supreme Court for Justice Gorsuch.
I like John Roberts personally.
He's a very good guy.
But he has been derelict in his duty to get his judicial house in order.
So Congress can step in, like oversight hearings, like cutting the federal judiciary's budget through the reconciliation, the budget process.
Those are pretty easy things to do.
You can also look at other things like opening impeachment inquiries for judges like Jeb Boesburg, who are illegally sabotaging the president of the United States as commander in chief when he's expelling foreign terrorists.
And Judge Boesburg, without power to do it, without jurisdiction, is exposing ongoing military operations to expel these terrorists, which endangers American lives and allied lives and ordering planes to turn around.
I didn't realize that these judges were generals and colonels.
I didn't realize that.
I'll tell you this, Don, they backed down, right?
On the Trendy Aragua case on Good Friday, they issued that injunction to order the president to stop expelling foreign terrorists, which they had no power to do.
But then after the political heat from the Article 3 project and other outside groups, Stephen Miller said, They backed out.
They punted the issue to the Fifth Circuit.
So I know that the political pressure works with these judges, particularly John Roberts.
Yeah, and it feels like that's the kind of political pressure we need to start exerting because the conservative judges, they live in D.C. And I always say it's sort of an easy existence.
You can be a conservative in D.C. as long as you give up when it actually matters.
Then they leave you alone.
And it feels like some of these judges, even on the Supreme Court, who otherwise have pretty solid conservative bona fides, they get there and all of a sudden it's like, man, we're just not going to take this one on because I don't want someone protesting in front of our house.
Again, if we did that to the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we'd be in jail and we'd be penalized.
If it happens to the conservatives, nothing happens.
Are they likely to just keep folding to that pressure because you know the left is still going to ramp it up?
Well, here's the dirty secret with these guys.
They're all politicians in robes.
They were politicians.
That's how they got on the bench.
I've worked on the confirmations of five of them, so I know how they got on the bench.
They probably should understand that things have changed from the past.
These conservative justices can move to the left to get glowing praise from the New York Times and the Washington Post and make the protest at their home stop, and then nothing happened on the right.
And so it was just a one-way ratchet for these justices and judges.
They would just move to the left, right?
It was the Linda Greenhouse effect.
Well, we're countering that at the Article 3 project, because when they move to the left, we're going to beat the hell out of them politically from the right.
Let's talk a little bit about the current makeup of the federal judiciary and, you know, Trump 47 judicial nominations.
What stands out most to you?
So President Trump's biggest accomplishments of his...
And I know they disappoint us from time to time, particularly when it comes to keeping Trendy Aragua foreign terrorists in this country.
They ruled within 24 hours on the Supreme Court to save these foreign terrorists from expulsion, and they waited 30,000 hours to rule on Americans who were persecuted.
On January 6th.
So let that sink in.
30,000 hours for Americans, 24 hours for Trend Day Iraq.
So I'll tell you what we're working with.
President Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, White House Counsel Dave Warrington, Deputy Counsel Steve Kenney.
We're working with President Trump and his team at the Article 3 project to make sure we have even more bold and fearless judges in his second term, like Whitney Hormenderfer, who's going on the Sixth Circuit.
In Kentucky, or Amal Bovee, who's going to go on the Third Circuit in New Jersey.
These are bold and fearless judges.
These are conservatives.
They have great credentials.
And there have been many opportunities over the last five years with COVID lockdowns, with BLM riots, with lawfare.
With election theft, there have been many opportunities for conservative lawyers to be bold and fearless.
Not many of them stepped forward to be bold and fearless, but Whitney and Amel certainly did.
And those are the type of judges who President Trump is going to put on the bench in his second term.
Yeah, you mentioned sort of the 30,000 hours for J6ers, if they even did anything.
You saw something this week regarding some of the Second Amendment issues that were out there.
Well, we're just going to pass.
We'll take this up at another time.
We're so busy.
Well, I mean, you weren't so busy to get something done in 20 minutes to save a murderous, drug-dealing, criminal gang member thug from deportation.
You could do that overnight.
But you just don't have enough time to do some of the other stuff that actually affects such a large swath of the American populace.
And that's the problem, Don.
You have these elite that we I think the problem in the first term is, is we were too elite focused on these judges.
So we need to pick judges who not only are qualified, but also have a backbone like Whitney and Emil.
You have Amal Bovee, who was top of his class at Georgetown Law School.
He clerked for two federal judges, including a Second Circuit judge and a judge on the Southern District of New York.
And he spent the last four years defending President Trump against unprecedented republic-ending lawfare.
And Todd Blanche and Amal Bovee are now at the Justice Department as topical.
These are the lawyers who are qualified and, more importantly, have demonstrated courage, who President Trump should be appointed to these key posts in his White House, in his Justice Department, at DHS, and most importantly, on the federal bench.
As you know, Don, President Trump has learned his lesson from the first term.
He had four years in office.
He's had four years to reflect.
He was ready to govern on day one, and he knows that picking the right people is crucial to his success.
Also, I know my father recently had some choice words for Leonard Leo.
I know Leonard Leo is sort of one of the architects of the original sort of judicial lists of what was going on there.
Seemed to have gone off the reservation from someone as a conservative stalwart, at least reputation.
traditionally before that.
Now it's like he's almost with the Democrats on some of this stuff.
What was your reaction to that?
What's the backstory?
And, you know, you've sort of covered it a little bit, but what are the other things we should be looking for in judicial nominations in breaking from, you know, what we did the first term?
You know, I used to be friends with Leonard Leo, and it's kind of sad what happened to him because No one knew who the hell Leonard Leo was until President Trump worked with Leonard Leo and Don McGahn in his first term to create the list of potential Supreme Court picks.
And then after President Trump made Leonard Leo very famous and Leonard Leo got very rich, Leonard Leo abandoned President Trump.
Abandoned President Trump, especially During the law fair, Ed Whalen, who is one of Leonard Leo's grantees, has been out there undermining President Trump on the law fair every step of the way, saying that having his presidential records in the office of former president in Mar-a-Lago, which is allowed by the Presidential Records Act, is somehow espionage.
Going after President Trump's judicial...
The guy's right out of central casting.
Emil's right out of central casting the prototype of the judicial nominee for President Trump's second term.
Leonard's groups even went after President Trump's cabinet picks.
I would say to Leonard that, you know, if you have any sense of loyalty, just keep your mouth shut, right?
They don't, Mike.
We know that by now.
They don't.
Wherever the political winds go, whoever's going to decide to fund them, keep them living in whatever style they've become accustomed, that's where their loyalty lies, unfortunately.
Yeah.
He got $1.6 billion from this donor, Barry Saeed.
And what has Leonard done with that money?
Has he funded Trump-aligned groups to help the America First movement to help President Trump during the law fair?
What has he done with that $1.6 billion besides buying second and third homes and flying on private jets and living a lavish lifestyle?
Yeah, not a lot, I would imagine.
What should we be keeping our eye on as it relates to all of these different circuit courts?
We always hear about the Ninth Circuit, but what is driving the nonstop injunctions?
Is it just purely activism?
What else is behind it?
It's activism, and it's the Chief Justice.
This is squarely on his doorstep.
Chief Justice John Roberts should be...
He's allowing it to continue.
It is disgraceful.
It's despicable that he's allowed this to happen.
They are the election deniers.
The American people gave President Trump this electoral mandate to cut waste from an abuse, to expel illegal aliens, particularly these foreign terrorists.
Let me just give you an example.
Back in 2023, the Supreme Court said that President Biden essentially can let in 20 million illegal aliens because the plaintiff supposedly didn't have standing.
Standing's a little trick these judges play to avoid deciding messy.
Two years later in 2025, they're trying to tell the president of the United States that he cannot expel Tren de Aragua foreign terrorists who are working with the state of Venezuela to rape, murder, kidnap, torture, terrorize Americans.
Something is very, very flawed with our federal judiciary if they think this is acceptable.
The American people are the sovereign.
We the people are the sovereign.
The most cornerstone sovereign power is the power to control our borders.
We never gave the.
We never did that.
Not at our founding, not after the Civil War, not in any Congress since then, and certainly not in this last election.
So if these federal judges think there's going to be constitutional due process in federal Article III courts for 20 million illegal judges, The federal judiciary is going to light its legitimacy on fire with a broad swath of the American people.
And when they lose their legitimacy, these judges lose everything.
Yeah, no, that one was sort of the hypocrisy.
The sheer insanity of like, hey, one president can bring in as many illegals.
It doesn't matter if they're criminals.
I mean, we know the numbers were 13,000 murderers.
They knew about it.
This is Biden's ice.
You know, they knew about 13,000 murderers, 16,000 rapists, 600,000 criminals, millions of others that will just likely be permanent dependents.
I'm sure there's a couple of good people in there as well, but like, no problem.
You can do that.
But the next president can't do anything about it.
They can't reverse this thing that the president did before.
And, you know, I just don't even understand how one can have the power to do one thing and the other can't have the power to undo it, especially since none of this went through Congress.
Yeah, and it's amazing to me that these elitist judges have no problem with these terrorists roaming the streets of Aurora, Colorado, these working class communities.
Well, they only took over a couple of buildings, Mike.
It's only a couple of buildings.
I mean, it's only a couple.
So I say this, and these judges are saying that President Trump is expelling a Maryland father.
So, okay, if they're just these Maryland fathers who are harmless, I get in trouble for saying this, but I don't give a damn.
Let's house these Maryland fathers, Trendy Aragwan Maryland fathers, in the Chevy Chase Country Club.
And let's give them day passes, because they have to go work to support their families as American fathers.
Give them day passes to roam the streets of Chevy Chase, and they can go to all those houses with the signs up.
They'd say everyone's welcome here and maybe they can go knock on the doors and get food.
I mean, if they're not dangerous terrorists, then they should be able to walk around Chevy Chase.
Correct.
Or Martha's Vineyard.
Or Martha's Vineyard.
I mean, it's amazing.
It's amazing.
We saw with Martha's Vineyard, that was the fastest deportation operation by the military in world history.
The seconds they showed up with the libs of Martha's Vineyard.
So one thing I keep hearing a lot about is these injunction bonds as a way to combat lawfare.
Can you explain that in detail?
Because I hear about it.
What is it and why do they matter?
So when you file a lawsuit, particularly against the government, and you're asking the government to spend money, Whether it's, you know, USAID sending $2 billion out the door to Gaza terrorists or whatever the issue is, you have to put up money because this is a preliminary injunction.
You have not resolved the case at trial on the merits.
It hasn't gone to the judge and hasn't gone to the jury.
there hasn't been a verdict, right?
And so when you're doing an injunction that's gonna cost the government money, the plaintiff needs to put up a bond to make sure that the government can recoup that money
He ordered President Trump to send out $2 billion.
And foreign aid from USAID without the president being able to do a national security review to make sure we're not funding Hamas terrorists, for example, under the guise of Gaza humanitarian relief.
And Judge Ali ordered President Trump to send this $2 billion out the door before that review, which is just totally lawless, totally unconstitutional.
And of course...
But the problem is that there was no injunction bond.
And so when this $2 billion gets pissed away or goes to Hamas terrorists to kill Americans, how are we going to get that $2 billion back when the government ultimately prevails on the merits in this case?
And that's why...
And of course, these activist judges are not following the law.
How do you force that?
Because obviously injunctions are things that are supposed to happen immediately.
They're supposed to happen quickly.
That's basic law.
How do you make those things and make it effective?
I would think that just based on the way the process is designed, you can't just get around that and say, nope, we're not going to waive this one.
It seems like it would be a great way to stop these things, but is it actually effective in practice?
Yeah, I mean, it would be helpful.
I mean, you thought that the Congress has the power of the person, so maybe it would be useful for people like, hey, let's say Jim Jordan, the House Judiciary Chairman, to haul in these judicial officials.
So that's a good assignment for Jim Jordan.
I think he's still the House Judiciary Committee Chairman.
I haven't heard from him for a while, but if he's out there, that's a good assignment for him.
What's most remarkable is really how We're also now learning that our own NIH was literally funding Chinese researchers that were just busted by the FBI for agro-terrorism and trying to poison the food supply.
I mean, it's wild.
It's like Wuhan all over again.
We keep funding our enemies with things that could be destructive.
Of course, they're not going to do that research in China because if they destroy someone's crops, it's going to be America.
We know based on literally all experience in the world that these are people all reporting back to the CCP, etc.
What role should the DOJ or the judiciary play in stopping foreign infiltration of our critical supply chains?
They need to open criminal probes.
Remember what happened last time, as you mentioned, with COVID.
You had Tony Fauci, this mad scientist who illegally funded gain-of-function research.
Very dangerous research in the Wuhan lab.
They created COVID, a bioweapon, in the Wuhan lab.
It escaped the Wuhan lab.
All the people who were back in China for the Chinese New Year went to Italy to go work in the leather factories and brought Wuhan to Italy, and it spread throughout Europe and spread throughout the world.
It was a bioweapon created.
And he lied about this.
He lied to Congress.
He covered it up.
He obstructed justice.
He killed millions of people, and we lost trillions in treasure because of Tony Fauci's bioweapon, right?
And we're going to do it again with another bioweapon that China is making and going to smuggle into the United States.
There needs to be aggressive congressional oversight, and there needs to be a criminal probe opened.
From the Justice Department on this.
Well, of course, he was pardoned.
But I mean, I'd argue he's one of the greatest purveyors of terrorism on American soil because of that.
But I mean, the fact that we were ever so naive to think, oh, yeah, we should just fund really dangerous bioweapons potential research in China with U.S. dollars, stuff that they'll weaponize against us.
I mean, it's it's wild that it's even like that we'd even consider like this could possibly be a good idea.
I mean, is anyone that stupid?
Are they that naive?
Or do they just not care?
I mean, the fact that Tony Fauci was pardoned is exactly why they should call him to testify.
He cannot claim the Fifth Amendment right to self-incrimination.
And he needs to explain what happens.
And then they need to probe his co-conspirators in this.
And they need to probe whoever the hell's funding the latest bioweapon that China's trying to smuggle.
Back into our country.
You would think that after years of COVID lockdowns and learning loss and human misery that we would lock this down a little bit better now.
Do you see any action on that front?
Because I don't, unfortunately.
Maybe there's action happening behind the scenes.
I know that Cash Patel and Dan Bongino are doing a fantastic job at the FBI, and I think Pam and Todd are doing a fantastic job at the DOJ.
So I imagine that there's an investigation behind the scenes, but I will tell you that Congress needs to start doing public hearings on this immediately.
Yeah, I agree with you.
Mike, a new report from The Federalist reveals how the Comey FBI basically had a secret feature available to select agents that made certain files unsearchable.
It was used by the Mueller team.
It's insane, but also probably not surprising.
What have you been hearing about the work Cash and Dan are doing inside the Bureau to address this, that you could basically prevent anyone from looking at some of these major things?
Again, make sure just the activist agents, not the real door kickers that actually want to do right by America, but just the activist agents and bureaucrats are able to weaponize the FBI.
I mean, this is, again, not surprising, but sort of next-level insanity.
My former boss, Chuck Grassley, the senator from Iowa, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has been a vocal critic of the FBI for 40 years, going back to when Iowans were killed by the FBI at Ruby Ridge.
Grassley has constantly called for oversight of the FBI, and it has never happened until now.
And Cash Patel and Dan Bongino are doing a fantastic job of opening the files of the FBI, letting sunlight in.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Pam and Todd and Emil and Cash and Dan, they inherit it.
They inherited a Justice Department, particularly an FBI, that has been politicized and weaponized for decades.
It was on steroids under Joe Biden.
And we don't hear about what they're doing every day, but I can assure you, as someone who works very closely with all of them, that they are making very serious reforms.
They are bold and fearless.
Sometimes they do things that disappoint some of us from time to time.
But I'm telling you what, the president has a very good team at the Justice Department, including the FBI, and they're going to clean out that rat's nest.
I guess, speaking of corruption and fraud, we seem to be getting more and more evidence of things like mortgage fraud from some of the biggest Trump haters out there.
I know we've talked about Letitia James and Fannie Willis and some of these guys a few times together on this show.
What are you seeing out there?
This is great, Don.
Remember Big Tish James, the New York Attorney General, said that Mar-a-Lago, that President Trump somehow defrauded these sophisticated Wall Street banks and then paid them back in full on time as agreed with interest because he said that President Trump overvaged.
They say Mar-a-Lago was worth $18 million.
I literally had to do testimony in the Southern District of New York trying to explain that Mar-a-Lago basically being 20 acres, it's on the ocean, it's on the intercoastal Mar-a-Lago from the ocean to the sea, to the lake.
And I remember the judge being like, oh, he literally complimented me as I'm getting off the stand.
That was really good because I'm talking about how there's a half an acre lot where they tear down.
Like, you know, 1970s piece of garbage house, like, literally across the street, and it's on the market for $50 million.
And, like, he's kind of like, wow, that's a great explanation.
Like, here's the living room of Mar-a-Lago.
I mean, I think you can see the difference.
And it didn't matter.
Like, they knew, and it didn't matter.
These people are truly sick.
Does anything actually happen for that?
Or, you know, is it, hey, because this one was cut and dry.
I mean, the R's, they're trying to say you overvalued something.
So maybe you got like, you know, when...
It seems sort of weird, whereas she's the attorney general of the state of New York.
She signs a loan document saying, yes, this residence in Virginia is going to be my primary residence.
That's like one of four or five things.
Then there's the unit count because you get more favorable financing if you lie.
That seems really cut and dry.
I mean, almost just like it's there.
Here's the four pieces of paper.
Here's what she's actually done.
Do you think anything ever happens, or is this one of those things in New York?
As long as you're on their side, you fight for them, you'll always get away with it.
No, I think Tish James is in serious legal jeopardy.
Remember, as your dad says, a tennis court in Mar-a-Lago is worth more than $18 million.
Mar-a-Lago's worth at least $500 million by everyone's estimate, and it's probably worth over a billion.
Yeah, when that one happened, I called my dad.
I was like, hey, I'll take $10 million.
He goes, what do you mean?
You'll take 10 what?
I was like, I'll take 10 Mar-a-Lagos at $18 million.
I don't have the money, but I'll figure out how to find it by tomorrow morning.
Just give me 10. It was kind of funny, but he was like, That's how insane it is.
Yeah, I mean, I would say this about Big Tish.
You said that Virginia is your primary residence, but here's the problem, New York statute requires So where's your residence?
If it's Virginia, you can't be the New York Attorney General.
And if it's in New York, then you're a felon because you've lied on your mortgage application and said that Virginia's your primary residence.
So you can get a better loan.
And so I would think that the prosecutors And if Tish James can get away with mortgage fraud that's so clear-cut, what signal does that send?
What message does that send to the rest of America?
Can everyone else?
Lie in their mortgage applications.
So I don't know what they're doing in the Eastern District of Virginia, but they should get moving on this.
Yeah, rules for thee, but not for me, I guess, is sort of the consistency.
Yeah, that was her mantra, right?
No one is above the law.
No one's above the law.
I've heard that a hundred times.
I mean, and what she's done, again, is so cut and dry.
It's insane.
Are there others out there doing the same thing?
Have they just been able to use their political office to have different a different fact set for themselves?
You know what I've been saying on your show for many years and it always gets me in trouble, which makes me want to say it again, is that remember, these Democrats politicized and weaponized law enforcement and intel agencies to go after.
President Trump, his top aides like Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro who went to prison, his supporters on January 6th who were persecuted according to the Supreme Court's Fisher decision, parents outraged by gender chaos in schools and the resulting rapes in bathrooms, Christians who are praying at pro-life,
praying at abortion clinics while they give amnesty to Biden, his scumbag family who took over $23 million from our worst enemies into their bank accounts, Hamas terrorists who are terrorizing Jews, hunting and terrorizing Jews, abortion industry activists who are obstructing justice and terrorizing justices outside of their homes.
There has to be accountability.
And I know that Pam Bondi and Chad Mizell and Todd Blanche and Emil Bove and Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, Harmeet Dillon and many others, this is a dream team that President Trump has created.
And I imagine that justice will come and justice will prevail for all this unprecedented republic-ending lawfare.
What do you think the time frame on some of these things is?
I know when it was us, it was like, here's a complaint.
You're testifying in a week.
They were able to fast-track these things and actually get to that justice, even though, as we all know now, it was all BS and it always was.
Can they stall these things out?
Do they wait for a more politically favorable environment?
Do they wait until after midterms?
I'm sure they'll start their law fair with me again.
All the nonsense, I guess, we're sort of used to it.
It's sort of like my average Tuesday at this point.
But can they stall this thing into a time where it just goes away?
They can, and this is why it is so critically important that these Senate Republicans Stay in session.
They work about two and a half days a week.
They come in Monday at 5 p.m. and they leave Thursday at 2 p.m.
And so we have a whole backlog of nominees who need to get confirmed, including nominees at the Justice Department.
And so we cannot start these investigations until these nominees get confirmed.
And so I would tell these Senate Republicans, let's end your French work week.
Let's have you work on Fridays.
I know that merely threatening to make Democrats work past 2 o 'clock on Thursday will confirm a lot of nominees.
Let's get President Trump's nominees confirmed before you go on your next recess, because recess is for kids.
I like that.
I mean, who's in charge of that?
Is that Senator Thune?
That is Thune, and he did a very good job on President Trump's.
The Article III project had to give these Senate Republicans an attitude adjustment on Pete Hegseth and Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard and others.
They've had that attitude adjustment for the cabinets.
Now we need to have an attitude adjustment for the subcabinets, right?
So we can get President Trump's judges and executive branch officials, including prosecutors, confirmed so we can make sure that President Trump can do his job.
Mike, how can people find out about the Article 3 project, your organization?
How do they support it?
How do they stay on top of these things?
And where can they also sort of apply some of the social pressure, whether it's media?
Just because, again, I feel like the other side is very good at being activists.
They're very good at being loud.
They make our side feel the pressure.
How do we make our side feel the pressure as well?
Well, that all goes to the same place.
Go to article3project.org, article3project.org.
Follow us on social media.
Donate, but only what you can afford.
The most important thing that your audience can do, Don, is take action.
We saw with the hundreds of thousands of phone calls and emails into Americans' home state senators that we were able to confirm President Trump's cabinets.
We're going to do the same thing on his sub cabinet.
We're going to do the same thing on judicial sabotage.
It is really important that your audience goes to the article three projects dot org action center and take action.
Who else are the other big guys on your team that they can also follow along?
Because again, I feel like, It's why you're on the show so often.
Who are the other guys that they should be following, watching, who are doing this work with you?
Again, because it's about getting that message out.
The bigger voice box we can create for those guys, the more effective I think we can be.
So the Article 3 project has Josh Hammer from Newsweek and Will Chamberlain.
They do fantastic work, really good, smart attorneys.
And then we have a lot of good allies like Julie Kelly, like Molly Hemingway, the people.
At The Federalist, they do phenomenal work.
Rachel Bovard at CPI.
Those are the people you should be following as Article III projects and our key allies.
Awesome.
Well, guys, make sure you check it out.
Mike, thank you so much for joining us today.
Really appreciate it.
Keep up the good work.
God knows we need it.
Thank you, Don.
Guys, thanks so much for tuning in.
Remember to like, to share, to subscribe, to keep getting the message out.
You guys are the front lines of that.
If you sit there with apathy like everything else, nothing happens.
We have a great chance to take out the mainstream media, take out their narrative by making sure real news gets out there.
Force them to stay in check.
Also, guys, check out our incredible sponsors down below in the video description.
Make sure to support people who support stuff like us.
Download the Rumble app on your smart TV so you can watch us on your big screen TVs.
Check us out on Spotify, iTunes Podcasts.
If your friends get their podcasts that way, make sure they're aware.
You guys make that happen.
It's easy.
Like, share, subscribe.
Hit the button now.
Get after it.
Thanks, guys.
▲
Export Selection