Guys, the Ministry of Truth, you know, the subsector of the Department of Homeland Security, one of our biggest at-home law enforcement administrations.
The new head of that, Nina Jankiewicz, who's the boss of the Ministry of Truth, wanting to seek out disinformation.
Well, in 2020, she said that government should not be in the business of policing disinformation.
Thank you very much, Congressman.
I totally understand your aversion to the idea that government would fight back against disinformation.
In fact, you know, the use of that term has been basically the foundation to some very draconian fake news laws in places like Russia or even Singapore.
I do not believe that government should be in that business either.
And I'll get to some of the solutions in a second.
But to address And now she's in charge of the quote-unquote disinformation bureau of the government.
You can't make this stuff up anymore.
So I'm reading from an article in Breitbart.
I don't think that government should be in that business, she said during testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.
She was questioned by actually a Democrat, Jim Hines of Connecticut, who apparently had an experience growing up in tyrannical Latin American countries and was violently allergic, and I quote, to governments that claim to be regulating the flow of information, as we should all be.
Okay? He says, we start going down that path and we're not just breaking democracy, we are breaking classical, enlightened liberalism.
I don't know if that exists anymore, guys.
That whole classical liberal thing, I think they've just gone off the deep end and everyone's a radical communist leftist.
But it's sick.
And even the Democrat knows it.
They actually know it.
He also noted, and I quote, that there were also examples of Democrats using disinformation, such as President then Barack Obama, saying that if they wanted to keep your private insurance plan, you could do it.
If you liked your doctor, you can keep them.
Remember that whole nonsense?
So should social media companies, should they be out there pursuing the former president for breaking a promise to all the voters who voted for him, to Americans in general?
Of course they should by these rules, but we know that the rules won't be implemented that way, right?
Again, the Department of Homeland Security, a huge organization, militarized weapons and everything, they're going to be in charge of what is and what isn't information.
And I have a feeling when you have a radical like Leon Jankovic in there, it's going to be weaponized against Individuals that they don't agree with.
You saw, she pointed out in the same thing, talking about how, you know, there was a domestic plot against Gretchen Whitmer.
You know, they don't talk about the FBI's involvement and they also don't talk about now that the people that were actually in there, there have been two acquittals and two hung juries apparently, right?
What was or was not the correct information?
Was the Wuhan lab leak theory, which was dubbed misinformation and labeled as such, that seems to be pretty damn accurate now?
And everyone's like, yeah, of course, that was probably where it originated.
Like, you would have been tarred and feathered in the public square two years ago when people like me questioned what was going on with that.
So that we can't even have that discourse, that they can decide what is and what isn't truth right from the beginning.
Isn't that scary? I mean, that's what fascism is about.
That's what communism is about.
We're going to give you what the truth is.
It doesn't matter if we find out later.
We're going to suppress it now. Rather than being American, having that dialogue, being able to talk these things through, to put out ideas, even if they're bad ideas, that people can listen to and figure it out for themselves.
I promise you guys, I've been in the room for the last five years.
I've seen a lot of this quote-unquote misinformation, and I've seen what the media reports, and I can assure you, That the misinformation is coming from our mainstream media, who doesn't even have a pretense of objectivity anymore, who could care less about whether they're lying or not, as long as they're able to move the needle politically in the direction that they want.
So give me a break.
I'm glad to see some Democrats pushing back on this kind of craziness.
Hopefully that will continue, because knowing them, they're going to allow it to happen, because as long as they're controlling the upper echelons of government, as long as they're controlling the Ministry of Truth, They're probably fine with it because they'll weaponize it.
Just ask yourself, what would all of these Democrats that seem to be fine with this or that are totally quiet on this right now, what would they say if Donald Trump created a ministry of truth?