March 24, 2022 - Triggered - Donald Trump Jr
05:17
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Okay, guys, this is a question I never thought I'd actually have to ask. | |
| But when did Democrats, or at least Democrats in Washington, D.C., become so pro-pedophile, seemingly? | |
| I mean, has it always been this way? | |
| Were they always into that, but, like, technology didn't make it that easy? | |
| Or is it that technology now makes it easier to catch them? | |
| At any other time in American history, the mere defense of this sickness would be disqualifying. | |
| Now it's not even, like, shameful to them. | |
| I mean, you have someone Who's up for the Supreme Court of the United States, who gave industrial-level child porn traffickers, like, light sentences. | |
| When Ted Cruz asks her why she did this, Dick Durbin, the leading Democrat on the commission, just cuts off the questioning. | |
| Like, I mean, why would you even ask for that? | |
| I mean, she's gonna rule on the most important cases in American history from the point she joins that bench, but, like, come on. | |
| I mean, that's not even really a question, right? | |
| I mean, Pedophiles across the country must be rejoicing at the prospect of having Judge Jackson as a continued advocate for them sitting on the Supreme Court. | |
| I literally can't believe Democrats and the usual rhinos who don't want to get involved because it's beneath them, apparently, to question these sorts of things like, you know, Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse. | |
| Parents, like, you think it's time to speak up? | |
| You think maybe it's time to get involved? | |
| Ted Cruz actually pulled out a whiteboard to illustrate that Katenji Brown Jackson gave defendants an average of 47.2% less of a sentence than what prosecutors recommended. | |
| And don't forget, I believe she's from a pretty liberal area, so that's already probably lenient prosecutors on this sort of stuff, given, again, what seems to be a trend Of being like, well, you know, this is just, it's not really that big a deal, right? | |
| Does blue checkmark Twitter? | |
| Do Democrats in Washington, D.C. not understand that to the American public, like 99% of them, child pornographers are the lowest of the low, the absolute scum? | |
| You know, Josh Hawley talks about, literally, her sentencing guidelines, where she actually seems to apologize. | |
| I'm trying to read here. He read from a sentencing Where she said she, quote, feels so sorry for the perp's family and, quote, for you, for the anguish that this has caused you. | |
| What about, like, the kid? | |
| Because, again, it's not just pornography, right? | |
| Like, that kid is a victim, okay? | |
| Whether you want to call it rape or whatever, that kid's a victim of these things. | |
| And it's like, you know what? | |
| We'll let it go. A guy that has a huge collection of prepubescent pornography, hours of it, you know, you say to him, you're not really a pedophile. | |
| We just feel sort of sorry for him. | |
| What is going on here? | |
| So she gives lenient sentence to a child predator because he presented all of his diplomas and certificates, meaning he was a little bit more of an academic pedophile. | |
| He had degrees and a pedigree, so he can't be like a regular pedophile. | |
| He's special and should be treated accordingly. | |
| How do you have this person on the Supreme Court? | |
| How can this person even be nominated? | |
| And how can Republicans not go all in? | |
| I would understand if you said, hey, if you're a child predator, death penalty. | |
| I think that's a much more reasonable solution than lenient sentencing. | |
| But that's not where Democrats are. | |
| Like other insane policies, whether it's energy, whether it's the environment, whether it's the economy, you've seen where that's gotten you. | |
| This is the one that's, to me, by far the most extreme. | |
| How does this person have a position on any court? | |
| I mean, if Dems think that, like, the Jackson child sentencing point is like a phony nothing burger, why won't they give the documents to the Republicans on the committee? | |
| They'll give it to the other Democrats on the committee. | |
| They have it. They won't give it to the Republicans. | |
| What a stupid move. It looks like they're hiding something about their record, which, of course, they are. | |
| Okay? Hawley goes on and asks more. | |
| You go on to say, quote, sex offenders are truly shunned in our society. | |
| I'm just trying to figure out, Judge, is the sex offender, the bad guy, the pedophile, is he the victim here? | |
| How is this going on? | |
| If there's one thing Republicans probably should run on in 2022 and 2024 and 2026 and 2028, it's this. | |
| I don't think that anyone thinks that this is right. | |
| And yet, again, to me, it seems as though it's becoming a part of the Democrat Party platform to defend these sorts of sickos. | |
| It's a huge unforced error for Democrats and Republicans should be all over it. | |
| Jackson isn't qualified to be SCOTUS for this alone. | |
| Clearly has to be deranged to even think about these sort of things, to do these sort of things. | |
| No normal decent person would try to rationalize the sexual abuse of children. | |
| She needs probably some help. | |
| Not a position of power. | |
| Not a position of power. | |
| So watch it. Get involved. | |
| Call your senators or this sickness is going to come pervasive across America. | |
| They're just going to rationalize it away. | |
| No problem. Enough of us feel this way so it's okay. | |
| Don't let it happen. | |
| Enough is enough. | |
| This is a sick and disturbing pattern and it needs to be stopped. |
Export Selection