April 23, 2021 - Triggered - Donald Trump Jr
03:35
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Okay guys, today we're going to talk about the rules on social media and how you must ultimately conduct yourselves because it seems as though there are rules, but they also seem quite arbitrary. | |
| We're going to talk a little bit today about the Kyle Rittenhouse stuff as it relates to people who've contributed to them and have been doxxed and ultimately lost their jobs, right? | |
| There was that Virginia police officer that donated to his defense fund just to help get him get a fair trial. | |
| I know they don't want that for someone who's not part of the desired narrative. | |
| So there was a Virginia police officer who was fired for donating to Kyle Rittenhouse's defense fund. | |
| And that information was made available because It was essentially doxxed. | |
| Twitter, and I quote,"...defends not censoring hacked content about donors who gave Kenosha shooters legal defense." So Twitter allowed the information of those who have donated to Kyle Rittenhouse's defense fund to be made public. | |
| They were put out there, and Twitter defended that. | |
| And they said, you know, I guess it's okay. | |
| There was an article in the Daily Caller about it. | |
| But what Twitter didn't seem to be okay with was it banned the New York Post from publishing Excerpts about Hunter Biden and the laptop and the shady deals and the big guy and all of those things, things that people today, since the election, I've said, had they known about, because the media did literally, it feels to me, whatever they possibly could have to cover that up. | |
| But Twitter banned the New York Post. | |
| From talking about that. They shut down their account for violating its policies against doxing and sharing hacked materials. | |
| So how is the Hunter Biden laptop any different than Twitter defending, censoring hacked content about donors who gave to the Kenosha shooters legal defense fund? | |
| How is it different, folks? | |
| It's not. It's not different. | |
| It's not even a little bit different. | |
| It's just one narrative worked for social media's desired outcome, just like mainstream media. | |
| And one didn't. | |
| They don't want Kyle Rittenhouse to be able to have people donate to his defense fund. | |
| They don't want that because it's bad for the narrative if he gets off. | |
| They don't want information about Hunter Biden and things that could have hurt Joe Biden in the election out there because that would hurt their job essentially as being the marketing arm of the Democrat Party. | |
| So some hacked material And doxing material is okay. | |
| They won't violate the rules because we're getting to where we want. | |
| Others, when they hurt our desire to get to where we want, are a problem. | |
| So a Virginia police officer loses his job. | |
| Not for doing anything illegal or anything wrong, but because he simply gave to a legal defense fund. | |
| The New York Post, the second oldest, I believe, newspaper in America, got shut down for weeks if not months for doing the exact same thing. | |
| Not illegal. No one denied that the stuff was real. | |
| No one even pretended it wasn't real other than the mainstream media trying to run with it or just not talk about it at all so as not to be able to hurt Joe Biden. | |
| That's the difference. So those are the rules. | |
| Remember, if you're on one side, you're fine. |
Export Selection