All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2024 - David Icke
26:45
The 15 Minute City Tip-Toe - David Icke Speaking In Oxford - Dot-Connector
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I am here to bring light.
It's about healing.
Mind, body, soul.
Don't ever settle.
Find your purpose.
Find the answers.
Don't hold back.
Achieve maximum success.
Yes.
Book with me if you want to live.
Good evening, everybody.
Can everyone hear me okay?
Sorry about that.
I've got a message before we start from the Oxford City Council.
If there's anyone that's here, that's travelled more than 15 minutes to be here tonight, can you leave?
Right, so any of you that have seen David before, this is a slightly different format to how it used to be.
Not because age is catching up with him at all.
Just changing it up.
So he used to obviously do a presentation and talk for up to 12 hours and still have things to say, which is incredible.
So tonight, for the first hour, I'm going to sit with him and do an interview.
By interview, I mean I'll ask a question and then sit there quietly for 45 minutes.
And then for the second half, we're going to do a Q&A. So Christiana will run around with a mic and we'll give you guys the opportunity to ask your questions, whatever you want to ask.
We'll do that for about an hour and a half to two hours.
So if that's all right with you guys, let's go ahead.
So please welcome David Icke.
Oh!
Oh! Oh!
I don't like cushions.
I'll get rid of cushions.
I thought you'd moan they were too low.
It's a bit different to standing up for 12 hours.
10 hours sitting down is lovely.
Although I've never seen you before this tour have to have tonic water on stage because your throat's hurting so much.
Yeah.
You know, I thought I had a chill.
And then I thought I had a bit of flu.
And then I thought, no, they don't exist anymore, do they?
So I thought, I've got that COVID. I've got a touch of that COVID. Yeah.
Oh, it's mad.
The world's mad.
It certainly is.
Well, I mentioned...
That's lovely.
I mentioned 15-minute cities, which is appropriate.
Obviously, Oxford, there was a big protest here last year, which I came to.
It was amazing.
Climate change, since this new Labour government have come in, seems to be something they are pushing on with as much as anything.
Why is that, and why is that connected to 15-minute cities and the wider picture of the agenda?
Whoa.
What did you say before I came on?
You're going to ask me a question and then I'll talk for 45 minutes.
Well, you know, a guy called Keir Hardy started the Labour Party in the turn of the 20th century to give representation to the working class, which is kind of where I came out of on a council estate in Leicester.
And what's happened, particularly since Tony Blair, was happening before, but particularly since Tony Blair, is that that party has been completely co-opted to the global cult agenda.
And the people it cares for least are the ones that Keir Hardie started it to, at least that's the story, that he started it to protect and support.
And what a bloody irony, we've got another Keir, Starmer, who's now finishing off the last vestiges of what remains is not much of the old Labour Party.
And then alongside that, you'll know about this in Oxford, in the City Council and the County Council, you've got the Liberal Democrats and you've got the Greens, who basically have also been co-opted to this whole cult agenda.
Now that doesn't mean that everybody in those parties knows that.
They've just bought the line.
They've bought the story.
And therefore they think that they're doing what's right.
What they don't do is any research outside of their belief system.
And this is the massive, massive problem that people have belief systems and instead of having questions about them and realizing, which is something that is basically unquestionable, which is whatever we know there's always more to know, They just continue with the belief system.
And in terms of, for instance, censorship, it impacts on every area of our lives, including censorship.
So what a system story believer says, not least about human-caused climate change in this case, is I'm right And therefore by definition, because you're saying something different to me, you must be wrong.
And because you're wrong, what's it matter if you don't have freedom to speak?
And I've actually had that said to me.
And so it's interesting when you look at current events, how they continually hark back to things and concepts and techniques of manipulation that I've been talking about for 35 years nearly.
And I was going to say two techniques, but really it's three.
Come to mind with what's happening with human-caused climate change and the 15-minute cities and all this stuff that's going on.
And they are, one, a technique that I called in the 1990s problem-reaction solution, where you create a problem...
You do it covertly.
You blame someone else or something else for the problem.
You then are looking for a reaction from the public of something must be done.
What are they going to do about it?
And then those who covertly created the problem got that reaction, then openly offer the solution to the problems they have created.
But there's another version of that, which very much is human caused climate change, as it was weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2003, and that's no problem reaction solution.
Because with that you don't need a real problem, you need the perception of one, because the whole thing plays out exactly the same.
You sell the perception of a problem, you get the reaction to the perception of the problem, and then you offer the solutions to the problem that doesn't actually exist.
And alongside that comes something I call the totalitarian tiptoe.
This is when you start at A and you know you're going to Z. You know that's where you're going to end up.
You bloody don't tell the public, however, until you get so close that you can impose it because you know what the reaction's going to be.
So you go from A to B. You go as fast as you can, but not so fast that you alert enough people to where you're actually going to have what you want headed off.
It's like stepping stones.
And I have this phrase, know the outcome and you'll see the journey.
If you don't know the outcome, Z, where we're being taken, all these different changes and laws in society and the things that are introduced and the impositions and the changes, they can seem random.
You can look at them sometimes and say, bloody stupid politicians, I don't know what they're doing.
What are they doing now?
Why are you doing that?
And on the face of it, it makes no sense.
But if you know where we're being taken, it makes absolute sense.
So if you know the outcome, that's what they're trying to keep from us, you'll see the journey.
Suddenly the random, as you believed, becomes very obvious stepping stones to the outcome.
And what is happening in Oxford, in terms of the, quote, green agenda, because Oxford is so far ahead, it seems, of most places in this, has to be seen in that context.
Because you can, in and of itself, and this is how it's sold, in and of itself, you can say, well, Well, I think it's a good idea that you keep traffic out the center of the city and people can walk around and go on their bikes.
It makes sense to me.
You can even say, well, I think it's quite a good idea that you have everything you need within 15 minutes walk or 15 minutes on a cycle.
But when you know the outcome, those two things take on a very different perspective.
And I was reading an article from 2022 in Time Out today.
It was about Oxford, and it was about 15-minute cities and all that.
15-minute communities, actually, as it should be called.
And it said the Oxford City Council have done this in relation to 15-minute cities and all that stuff, these 15-minute communities.
And the Oxford County Council have done this in relation to traffic and what have you.
And the article said that some conspiracy theorists...
Say that it's connected, but of course there's absolutely no evidence that it's connected.
Well, obviously it's absolutely connected because these are the stepping stones.
And so what is that outcome that this is moving towards?
Not just in Oxford, it seems to be further along the road, but everywhere eventually.
There was a...
Was it a trilogy or a quadruple?
I don't know.
The Hunger Games films, the movies.
And I was calling the society that this global cult wants something else before.
But when the Hunger Games movies came out, I thought, well, perfect, perfect.
The Hunger Games Society, I started calling it.
Because if you remember...
What you had was the Hunger Games Society was broken up into sectors, and each sector was not allowed to interact with the other sector.
A bit like lockdowns, mate, right?
Because in so many ways, what happened during COVID was a precursor, almost a rehearsal, for where they want to take us.
If they can Have everyone, for instance, working from home.
Well, there's your 15 minute city situation.
And if you want to Take apart, dismantle, and we're seeing this all the time, wait for this bloody budget probably at the end of the month.
Dismantle places where people interact.
Look at all the pubs that have disappeared.
Because of, quote, COVID and rising alcohol prices and all the rest of it.
All these areas that people call the entertainment industry, they are being targeted.
They've been targeted during COVID massively, but they're still being targeted.
Why?
Because what they want is for communities to be locked away in these 15 minute areas and communicating via the internet.
And not basically communicating any other way.
Because it just so happens there's something called the kill switch that can switch the internet off any time they bloody want.
So you go to internet communication to no communication.
And so how do you justify that?
How do you justify the transformation from petrol and diesel cars to electric cars?
Not to replace petrol and diesel cars with electric cars in terms of number, but to actually force people out of their bloody cars because they can't afford the electric version.
And if you look at all these targeting now of motorists and driving, Where you've got 20-mile-an-hour things.
I mean, I've traveled around London in these 20-mile-an-hour zones.
It's like freaking dystopia.
It's like everyone's walking...
It's just unbelievable.
It's like a dystopian movie.
And then you've got, and more to come, the targeting financially of motorists and driving, the targeting of People, for instance, in the ULES zone in London, where they're putting cameras up everywhere.
Now, there's another point.
Know the outcome and you'll see the journey.
What they're doing with Shere Khan, the mayor of London, anyone who's seen Jungle Book will know what I mean, and markable resemblance.
They're putting these number plate cameras all over London to police the ULES zone.
So, you know, if you're not compliant with it, it's £21.50 every time you drive your car off the bloody driveway or off the street, onto the street.
But that's not what they're there for, ultimately.
Stepping stone, totalitarian tiptoe.
What do you need to police 15-minute cities?
Number plate cameras.
And what they're saying, it was in this time out, it was very instructive reading this thing.
I mean, people say that journalists are lying to us, and a bloody lot of them are.
But one of the greatest diseases of mainstream journalism is naivety.
It's unbelievable how freaking stupid and naive these people are.
So what it was saying was that there's no evidence that these 15-minute cities are happening and that the ULES zone has to be seen as separate to everything else.
But it shouldn't be because it's all connected.
So Another thing that the article said was, in Oxford, they're not saying you can't leave your 15-minute city.
They're just trying to discourage you from using your car as much.
Well, that's the stepping stone.
And where it's going, where it's planned to go, you can see it in the documents of the World Economic Forum, this global coal operation.
They want to stop people leaving those zones without permission.
It's where they want to go.
So how do you justify that?
How do you justify this fascist dystopia?
Nothing less.
Well, you've got to have a problem.
To which people think you need a solution and you then provide the solution, which is what I'm talking about.
And so you invent human-caused climate change.
You don't invent climate change.
The climate's always been changing.
And it's vastly different over a long period of time for what it is now.
What you do is you invent human-caused climate change.
Why?
Because you want humans to be the enemy, the perceived enemy of humans.
And don't take my word for that.
In 1968, an organization was set up, headed by an Italian industrialist called Iriolo Pecci, called the Club of Rome.
And this Club of Rome is in the same network as the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations in America, the Trilateral Commission, the United Nations at its inner core.
And its job, the Club of Rome, the reason, the very reason for its creation was to exploit environmental concerns, some of which were real, Many of which were invented to justify the centralization of global power.
And out of that came what's called the environmental movement in the form that we see today.
Because it wasn't always like that.
And I sit here and speaking as a former national spokesman for the British Green Party.
It never lasted that long.
It was in the 1980s.
I didn't last a lot long in that job because I saw pretty bloody quickly that the Green Party, for all its claims to be different, was actually just another political party with a different rosette on the door.
And they operated in the same way, and they manipulated in the same way, and I was out of there.
It's not for me.
And I realise politics is absolutely not the answer.
But anyway...
In those days there was a much less emphasis on human-caused global warming.
It was all on pollution and stuff like that, which I had great sympathy for.
And then in 1992, Came something called the Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.
The Earth Summit, they called it.
And the Earth Summit was fronted up by a Canadian oil millionaire who was fronting up for those that owned him, who were the Rockefeller family and the bloody Rothschilds.
Why would the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds be suddenly concerned about the sodden environment?
A lot of what they've done in their companies and industrial kind of gigantic operations Have caused enormous damage to the environment.
Why are they suddenly seeing the light?
Well, they hadn't, of course.
Because if you want to transform global society under problem-reaction-solution, you need a global problem to which you can offer a global solution.
So out of that came this whole Global warming thing and it got more and more and more influential until today's Green Party is completely and utterly mesmerized by it and so is the Labour Party and so are the Liberal Democrats.
Much of the Conservative Party at its core is mesmerized by it but there are pushbackers there that can see through it.
And so you You start predicting, because you want to build up the fear, that this global warming, it's global warming.
If it's hot, it's definitely global warming.
If it's hot...
And if it's somewhere in between, well, that's global warming and all that stuff.
And everything's freaking global warming.
For instance, you've got named storms in this country now.
We used to have storms coming off the Atlantic.
Now we have storms with names.
And a lot of them have scary names.
There was a Hurricane Ike once.
Was there a Hurricane Ike?
Yeah.
Oh, right.
There was.
There was.
There was, yeah.
You've been messing with that weather technology, haven't you?
But I did have to laugh.
They called one of them Hurricane Betty.
Now, I can't get terrified about Hurricane Betty.
I've been to see Betty.
She's got a bit of wind, but I've given the bicarb, you know.
I mean, it's, oh, what?
I reckon Betty, trying to frighten me.
Anyway, they start predicting all this catastrophe.
There's got to be no ice at the Antarctic and the Arctic.
It's all going to be gone by this year.
It's going to be gone.
And Al Gore...
Al Gore.
He comes forward as the high priest of human-caused global warming.
And he made a fortune, makes a fortune.
Not least with a company which he started with a bloke from...
Goldman Sachs called blood.
They call it blood and gore.
I've looked at some of the background to our gore.
Blood and gore is probably a very, very good description.
These are very strange people with some very strange things that they do.
So anyway, he starts We're all gonna die!
Oh my God!
Give us your money.
Anyway, these things, Prince Charles, Prince Charles, oh yes, now King, King Charles.
Prince Charles, he starts, he gives it all.
And none of them frickin' happened, right?
None of them happened.
None of them happened.
But what we're doing now, and this is the important point of current events, We're moving towards a time, not least from 2025 onwards, where they really want to push this on.
They want to push this whole thing on.
You're going to see it with this...
This imbecilic guy, what's his name, Ed Miliband?
I mean, he's going to push this on with wind turbines and seascapes and landscapes and solar panels, farms and all that stuff.
Yeah, all that stuff.
He's got to push it on, push it on, push it on, push it on.
You've got to change the landscape of Britain in so many ways doing it.
And so they need to convince you there's a problem.
I write because I'm inspired to write.
I can go months and months and months and months and months doing all the other things, and then bang, I get the feeling I've got to start writing a book.
It's happened over and over again for 35 years.
And once I start, then the synchronicity begins.
That brings to me information in many and various ways and forms that take me deeper and deeper into the unseen, into the unknown, than I've ever been before.
And so the reveal Is the next stage of that.
Because humility, common sense, tells you, whatever we know, there's always more to know.
▲
Export Selection