We Need A Serious Level Of Unity - David Icke Dot-Connector
|
Time
Text
I am here to bring light.
It's about healing.
Oh Mind, body, soul.
Don't ever settle.
Find your purpose.
Find the answers.
Don't hold back.
Achieve maximum success.
Book with me if you want to live.
Available in English, Spanish and Italian.
Available in English, Spanish and Italian.
Thanks for watching!
you Welcome everybody to a very iconic, no pun intended, London skyline here behind us at Big Ben and Westminster.
Why are we here, Dad?
We've got a bit of a protest going on behind us.
Yeah, well, we're here because in the last few weeks since the Starmer Labour government won a massive majority from 34% of the vote, The UK has been plunged into ever more obvious tyranny.
We've seen people jailed for social media posts.
We've seen more and more, obviously, the policies that are playing out like the winter fuel allowance for so many pensions being scrapped.
That this Starmer government is going down the road of enormous austerity on the population, but also enormous tyranny in the sense of, I mean, we'll talk about it as we go along, but across the great spectrum of the World Economic Forum global cult agenda, all the boxes are being ticked either very early or being signposted that they will be by this Labour government.
And the point to make, ironically, as we stand here in front of the Houses of Parliament, the so-called Mother of Parliament, is that that is now irrelevant.
This protest has been organised because the MPs have come back to Parliament, but they're irrelevant.
What we're seeing is The shadow government, the global shadow government, which has been under the radar for so long, came out into the open during Covid, is now sprinting for the line in terms of all the agenda of control and dystopia that it wants.
And so, What this Labour government is doing, and Stalmer is doing, is following that agenda, irrelevant to what Parliament thinks.
And, you know, we can kind of see that in a clip that Stalmer, in an interview clip that Stalmer did before he became Prime Minister, in which he was asked, to make a choice between Parliament and Davos, i.e.
where the World Economic Forum meets every year, which would it be?
And he said, Davos.
And that tells you everything about where this government is going.
And we are talking about what's happening in Britain, but the agenda that they're following is exactly the agenda for the rest of the world, including the United States.
So let's have a look at that clip of Starmer.
Let's just ask you quickly, you have to choose now between Davos or Westminster?
Davos.
Why?
Because Westminster is too constrained.
And, you know, it's closed and we're not having many... Once you get out of Westminster, whether it's Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see working with in the future.
Westminster is just a tribal shouting place.
One of the things I took away from that is when she asks him why and he says because Westminster is so tribal and full of bureaucracy what that really means is there's people that can push back against what I'm trying to do whereas in Davos we sit in a room we decide what's going to happen and then we roll it out and he doesn't like the fact that he has to put stuff to Parliament which with the majority he doesn't really does he?
No, and you know, I think it's just dawning on the British people the scale of tyranny that's been, well actually by any democratic means, not elected with 34% of the vote.
Because when you look at this spectrum of cult, World Economic Forum plans and policies for the world, he's following all of them.
And he's talking about, in October, coming here to Parliament and having a budget that will be painful.
If you look at the middle class in America, which is slightly different to the middle class in Britain, but same theme, same principle.
They've been targeted decade after decade, and the middle classes are now going to be targeted big time.
Why?
Because they don't want people to be independent.
And people who have an opportunity to have an independent income or independent savings, they are independent to an extent of government and bureaucracy and authority.
So the idea is to take away that independence, that financial independence, even in the end their home ownership independence, And to create a situation where they are dependent upon the government.
And what they're planning in the end, and we'll see in this Labour government period, the stepping stones towards it very clearly, is that they destroy people's ability to be independent, they destroy independent businesses that are outside of the cult corporation network, And they create a situation where people become dependent upon the government for the basics of life.
So, when you are dependent on something, it controls you.
Whatever you're dependent upon controls you.
And the idea is to create A society in which the population is dependent for the very basics of life on the government and therefore you have to take away their independence, you have to take away their savings, you have to take anything that gives them this key word choice because freedom is simply
Measurements of how much choice you have.
The more choices you can make, the freer you are.
The less choices you can make, or the fewer choices you can make, the less free you are.
And the idea is to squeeze and squeeze and squeeze and squeeze choice across the whole spectrum.
Choice of what opinions you can have, what you can say, what you can post on social media.
Choice in the sense of taking away your ability to finance the choices you'd like to make, all of these things.
So in the end, they want to create a situation where AI is basically taking the jobs away It already has in many industries.
In so many ways.
The jobs holocaust is coming.
As we go nearer and nearer to 2030, AI is going to come in, it's going to take so many jobs away.
Even jobs that people think couldn't be done by AI, but they will be, because that's all part of the plan.
And also, by destroying, this is what this Starmer guy plans to do, Destroying independence makes you in a situation where, how am I going to put food on the table?
I haven't got any money now.
I've lost my job.
And what they'll do, and this is the plan, they'll come forward and they'll say, well, obviously we've got to sort this out.
We've got to look after the people.
So what we're going to bring in is a guaranteed income.
Universal basic A universal basic income, which will be a pittance and it will bring everybody down to the level of financial slavery and financial dependency.
And the other thing that will come in, and this will connect into the censorship and the fascism in terms of social media and what you can and cannot post, they'll say, In the end, you will only get the basic income if you conform.
If you want to challenge the government, if you want to challenge what we're doing, if you want to protest, then okay.
Although we're going to put a stop to that, but You're not going to get your basic income.
So... Oh, all the jobs are gone.
So, how are you going to put food on the table if you don't get the basic income?
And if you look at that situation, it's complete control of the population.
Over whether they even eat.
Well, you've just described a country in the Far East where they have that already over there in China, where if you want to leave the country, you want to travel, you want to do X, Y and Z, your social credit score has to be of a certain level.
Hence why people over there are so compliant.
So you've always said China's the blueprint for the world.
Yeah, this is the whole point of why I said that a long time ago, that if you want to see the West or what's planned for the West tomorrow, look at China today.
And as China becomes more extreme, so the West follows it a little bit behind, although it's catching up fast under this guy in Britain, to the point where your behaviour Uh, is dictated by government.
Your views are dictated by government because if you go outside those parameters, then there are going to be consequences.
And you're absolutely right.
I mean, okay.
In China, you have the social credit system, as you say, where if you don't behave as the government wants you to, you can lose the ability to go on a train or a plane, you are excluded from mainstream society.
What is the real difference in theme and it's planned here to become more extreme.
What's the difference in theme between that and jailing someone within days
for posting something on social media?
And so it's like we're already seeing it unfold in front of our eyes.
And if people think, well, you know, this country will never be like China, well look around because it's getting closer than that all the time.
And this has been my point in terms of China all along, that the Mao revolution in China was a cult revolution, a global cult revolution.
The global cult has no borders.
And why did they do that? Because they wanted to create a massive country with an enormous population
within which a system of control, not least through AI cameras and
technological control, could be incubated and could be developed that once it had reached a certain level, it
could then be played out across the world because the Chinese system is meant to be the global system,
not just in Britain, in America everywhere.
I And so, if you look at what happened during the COVID hoax, first of all, we were told that it came out of China.
Well, there was no COVID virus, so it never came out of China, but they said it came out of China.
And what has happened since that?
And what happened immediately during that COVID period when all the lockdowns were in and all the restrictions and all the fascism?
The West, and more than just the West, but especially the West became more and more like China.
And this is what they do.
They'll push you to an extreme, and then people eventually will kick off.
And then they come back a bit.
They don't come back where it was, they come back a bit.
And so people go, phew!
It's not as bad as it was.
Oh yeah, but it's worse than it was before!
And this is what they're doing all the time.
They're moving the... What I've just described is actually moving the normal.
So, they're moving the normal.
So, for instance, if kids come into the world as it is now, this is the world that they think the world is.
This is how it is.
Me, born in 1952, I can see it ain't like the world that I knew.
Even me, 1992, I can see the difference massively.
But kids today, they're looking at the world as it is and it's their normal.
Because the normal's been moved and the normal's going to be moved so much if the plan's allowed to go on between now and 2030.
You take a step back step back eventually your back hits the wall and that's kind of where we are now where we have to come out fighting and I think what you were talking about the plan to continue increasing this and keep pushing keep pushing unless they get resistance and push back they will continue to do that that's why it's so important to make a stand to resist to not comply otherwise you know as we found out through COVID a lot of people said it including you you're never going to comply your way out of this Because if you comply, they'll just keep pushing even more and more.
Yeah, I mean, an analogy I've used over the years is pushing the gate, where they'll push against the gate.
And if there's no resistance, they open the gate and they walk on to the next gate.
And if there's no resistance, they push through that and walk on to the next gate.
And if you look at Covid, when it started, any kind of resistance was very sporadic, very minor.
And they just kicked on and kicked on, and then eventually, as we know, there were hundreds of thousands of people walking through the streets, is that enough?
That actually united across religions and united across political belief systems.
And, um...
and they have to pull it back. So if we go on complying, we'll comply into exactly what they
want us to do. And when you say fight, of course, you don't mean literally fight, you mean not
comply with your own enslavement. A point I make about America, you know,
what they're always trying to do is to get us to give our power away to someone else.
Because united, the power we have united, putting aside the fault lines of divide and rule, and the fault lines of religion and political persuasion, all that shite, and realize that actually we're facing the same foe, and let's come together, and we can argue about all this later, let's sort this out first together.
And if you don't, then that divide and rule means that this agenda will go on and go on and go on.
And you know, if you are...
are not standing up for what you believe and refusing to comply, then obviously what happens is going to happen or what they want to happen will happen.
So let's look at this analogy.
Like I say, they're always trying to get you to give you power away to someone.
So currently in America, they want to give you power away to Trump or they want to give you power away to Harris.
But how many people voted for Trump at the last election and the one before that?
I think it was about 74 million.
Okay, so you've got 74 million bloody people and they go, here's our power, Mr. Trump, Ms.
Harris, you do it for the next four years.
What if those 74 million that supported Trump in the last two elections really don't want the shit that's coming?
What if they just ceased to cooperate with their own enslavement over that same five years?
It would be unenforceable because there'd be so many people that wouldn't comply.
But because they persuade us that politics is the answer, I mean, Keir Starmer, I rest my bloody case, because they think politics is the answer and that's the only way they can see any change coming about, they give their power away to these people.
And we've seen in the last few weeks where that gets us.
And also, they're falling into their trap.
So as we're talking now, Prime Minister's Questions is going on, hence why this protest is here and now.
This whole kind of argument against Starmer started, really, it was the Southport incident, and then the riots that followed.
And what you said about divide and rule is there.
You've got the Muslim immigration population on one side, then you've got the, well, they're saying the far right, but let's say the British population, indigenous British population on the other side.
They're both in the gun sights of this elite.
They're using them both as pawns to fight each other, whereas if they came together, Imagine if the British Muslims and Indigenous British came together and went no to that.
It's over.
But that's why they're trying to get people to fight each other, isn't it?
Yeah, well, let's ask a simple question.
Does anyone really think that the Starmers and the Harris's and all the others of this world actually give a damn about transgender people?
No, not at all.
They couldn't care less.
They're pawns.
They're a pawn.
They're a way of imposing an agenda of control and suppression.
Do you think they care about Muslim migrants coming across the channel?
They're pawns in a game.
I mean, I say to the Muslim community, you know, who do you think bloody bombed Iraq?
Who do you think?
Well, it was his mate Blair for a start in this country.
Who do you think bombed Libya?
Who's attacked Syria?
Who has turned the Middle East asunder decade after decade?
The very people, the very force that say, oh, we care about the migrants coming in and you mustn't say anything against them.
It's a game.
The idea is you keep bringing more and more migrant people in illegally, And you wind up the population more and more who can see the effect on services, they can see the effect on housing and what have you, and other services.
And eventually they're going to kick off, because this is the thing that is used all the time.
You ignore the concerns of the population, or a section of the population at least, and you ignore their concerns, you ignore the injustice that's being perpetuated, And you go on ignoring it until the population has a choice.
We accept the injustice, the concerns being ignored ongoing, nothing's going to happen, or we start getting violent.
And when they get violent, it's like, well, we've got to have more of a police state to deal with the violence.
You know, there's a guy over there, a statue of Gandhi, who was of course famous for peaceful non-cooperation and non-compliance.
But to get that, to make that work, we need a serious level of unity.
And what's happening is people are falling for the fault lines of divide and rule.
Okay, left and right.
Excuse me, you're both being manipulated by the same force.
No, no, no.
The strings that are you, and the strings connected to you, look, one hand's holding them.
And this is what people are missing.
That's why we've been pulled, even in the alternative media, into the left-right puppet show again.
So that this dividing rule can go on.
And they're dividing the indigenous population from the migrants, and the migrants from the indigenous population.
And, you know, why is it When you look at it dispassionately, why is it that vast numbers of illegal migrants are being allowed to cross the Channel and come into this country and be given money and hotels when people are homeless?
We've driven through London in a cab, and we've seen the homeless people, right?
We've got first campers here, top of the plant lane here.
People camping out here.
Spring weather for it though.
It was a bit wet today.
A bit of tent there and plough flinging here.
And there's even another one just down here.
This is Park Lane in London.
People probably camp around here.
I think it's probably unofficial to camp around here.
A bit blowy and wet today, but not too bad though.
But it's only overcast.
Probably unofficial camping.
As it's called, rough camping.
I don't think you're allowed to just camp in London.
They're probably international, probably homeless or whatever.
I'm park lane here.
And yet, people come across the channel illegally, and suddenly they're in hotels.
Now, why are they doing that?
Well, two things.
First of all, it's a perceptual control, perceptual manipulation, so it's not that they want to hide it from the population, they want them to see it, because they want to wind them up.
And so, Why would they do that?
Because they care about migrants?
Not at all.
Because the more that they bring in, the more they wind the population up in fury and frustration, the more they get the divide and rule they want.
And here's a question.
You know, I'm the first one to say, if people are fleeing war and fleeing persecution, I'm the first one, you know, We should help, of course we should!
But that's not what's happening.
What we're seeing is vast numbers of very clearly young adult men coming in.
Now, why would a government want lots of, in the stream now, of young adult men coming into this country and coming into Ireland?
People should ask themselves that, and they might get an answer they don't want.
Because...
They want to completely dismantle Western society.
And that's what's happening before our eyes, on purpose.
And the migrants are just a pawn in the game that they don't understand, just as most of the indigenous population are pawns in the game, the same game they don't understand.
Well, we have to start understanding it and realizing that both are being manipulated by the same force, and then we might get an idea of what's actually going on and why.
Well you saw that firstly with the way Starmer reacted to the riots where rather than trying to calm it down he just chucked gasoline on it by condemning everybody that has a concern about what you've just spoke about as a far-right thug when there would have been some far-right thugs in there but the vast majority of people just want to have a sensible conversation because they're seeing as you mentioned services You know, whether that be hospitals, whether that be schools, and they're also seeing their communities change dramatically.
Like where we're based in Derby, it's a very different community to what it would have been 30 years ago.
Yeah, they're seeing their communities change culturally.
Yeah, absolutely.
You know, and what I would say is, you know, what would happen if vast numbers of people from Britain that are, say, Christian or not Muslim, turned up at the borders of Pakistan and thought they were going to walk in.
What?
It wouldn't happen.
I mean, you know, they wouldn't last very bloody long if they pushed it.
So we've got, they talk about two-tier policing in this country, which we clearly have.
That's actually more appropriate.
Two-tier, you said two-kir, but that's actually more accurate.
Yeah, no, I meant to say two-kir, because two-tier, two-kir, it's him, it's advancing this stuff more than ever before.
But if you talk about two-kir policing, what about the two-kir standards of what happens if you wanted to do what's happening here in Pakistan?
Not a bloody chance!
But here it's okay, because they don't want to change Pakistan, not yet anyway.
They want to change the West.
That's why they're doing it.
You know, they're targeting white people overwhelmingly and putting them in the lower level of the two kia, not because of Any other reason?
Well, there might be other reasons, but the prime reason is that white people are the major racial group of the West.
Now, if you want to change the Western culture and dismantle Western society, you don't go for smaller groups in the West.
You go for the major one!
So you can say what you like about white people, not a problem, it's not racist, but say anything about anyone else and it's racist.
Same with religions.
Christianity and Catholicism, they're attacking more than anyone else.
Yeah, so you can say what you like about Christianity, but say anything about any other religion and suddenly it's a problem.
And why?
Because Christianity, and I'm not a Christian, I don't follow any religion, but Christianity, because of historical reasons, is weaved through the very fabric of Western society.
If you're going to dismantle Western society, of course you're going to target Christianity.
And when you've got Justin Welby as the Archbishop of Canterbury, who's woker than woke and wetter than wet, well you've got a great chance of destabilising the Christian Church and turning it into something else.
Yeah, it's so intertwined that right behind us you've got Westminster Abbey where kings and queens are coronated and royal funerals are, royal weddings are, that's how intertwined it is in British society.
Yeah, well this is another thing you see.
I've been saying now for a few years that when the Queen goes and the Prince Philip goes, then the Royal Family in Britain is going to be on its way out.
Might not be tomorrow, but it's on its way out.
And what we've seen since then is that process.
Why?
Because if you want to dismantle, say, British society and the British culture as it's developed, then you look at the institutions and the establishment institutions across London They're not the people's institutions, they're His Majesty's institutions.
The royalty is weaved again, like the Christian Church, through all of this British society.
So if you want to pull the cards out, you pull the cards out of Christianity, you pull the cards out of white people, and you pull the cards out of the royal family.
And I say that I say that as someone who would be delighted to see the royal family disappear, but we've got to be streetwise enough to see the reason it's happening now.
And of course the royal family has got smaller and smaller and smaller very quickly.
And it will not be around indefinitely anymore.
And when it's gone, His Majesty's passport office, His Majesty's treasury, His Majesty's government, His Majesty's most loyal opposition to the government... Armed forces, all of it.
Armed forces.
All these things have to be reformed.
What's the word?
Reset.
And that's exactly why it's going on.
And one of the ways that, to move on, one of the ways that they're doing that and silencing opposition to that is by increasing censorship.
So a couple of years ago you had the online harms bill going through the EU Parliament, you had one go through here, it kind of got watered down from what they wanted.
These riots have instigated a conversation to re-look at that harms bill, to include social media posts.
We've seen people jailed in the last few weeks, fast-track jailed, because of social media posts.
It's clear that they're trying to silence any criticism ahead of what they're bringing in in the future, isn't it?
Yeah, well you know, it all seems incredibly convenient, okay?
Clearly, Starmer has been brought in, I mean, you know, I was talking about this long before he came in, that when he comes in this is what will happen and it's happening.
Because he is completely controlled by this global cult and via one of its offshoots, the World Economic Forum.
That's why he's following this agenda.
It's not the agenda of the people.
He's got 34% of the vote.
It's the agenda of the World Economic Forum, which has been well documented.
And he's following it.
And so, when you look at the sequence, Not long ago, a matter of weeks, the Prime Minister here was Rishi Sunak of the Conservative Party.
And then he shocked even people quite close to him by announcing the election on July the 4th, right?
It was like, what's he doing?
He's got no chance of winning.
And as I was saying at the time, it's because he's not meant to win.
And so in comes Starmer, and right at the start of Starmer's Rain, in terms of following his master's voice, you had the riots.
And the riots allowed him immediately to impact on freedom of speech and to jail people within days.
Other people that would support Starmer, who put posts up, like one, the head of this organization Hope Not Hate, which I call Hate Not Hope, He posted during the riots that a Muslim woman had been attacked with acid.
Of course, riling up people, as you would expect from that, and it turned out not to be true.
Not only has he not been prosecuted, he's involved with the Osama government in terms of Advice on censorship.
And so there is a clear period in this country where Starmer came in and this agenda moved really, really quickly.
I mean, it was moving under the Conservatives, yeah, but now whoosh!
Is it really an accident that Rishi Sunak announces his election To shock even a lot of people around him.
And suddenly he's in and it's off.
It's because it's the timing.
The timing's there on purpose.
And so why?
Why the censorship?
Because The whole foundation of global cult control is control of perception.
Because until they connect AI to the human brain, which they're planning to do, clearly, and openly talking about it more and more, they can't control people en masse physically.
Like if you get AI connected to your brain, it's telling you what you're going to think.
It's telling you what you're thinking.
It's telling you how you're going to react.
That's the whole idea.
But before that, you've got a relatively few people.
Even if you add in all the law enforcement and everything, it's still a relatively few people
compared with the mass of the population.
So, you can't control everybody physically.
What you have to do is control their perception so that their behavior fits what you want it to be.
It's a very simple equation.
Control perception.
Perception forms behavior.
The collective behavior is what we call human society.
And how do we form perception?
We form it from information received.
Of all different forms of information.
So, if you want to control perception, thus control behavior, thus dictate the nature of human society, you've got to control the information.
And we saw this during COVID, where to warn people about the fake COVID vaccine, and be proved right with the passage of what's happened, was to get you banned from social media, was to get you ostracized, it was to get you silenced.
And the idea is that, I've said this a long time ago, that what the plan is, is to create a situation in which no one ever hears or sees anything that is not sanctioned by authority.
And to do that, you had to move information to the internet.
Because the more points of communication you have, like, you know, the old newspapers and magazines and stuff, The less likely you are to control everything.
But when you move information to the internet, now algorithms are going to do it for you.
The other thing, point out quickly on that, is you only have to censor it in one place.
Whereas if you've got a million newspapers out, you're not going to take a million newspapers off the shelves.
But if you've got a Facebook post, you can just remove it and no one can see it anymore.
Yeah.
I mean, how many people realize that free speech hero Elon Musk, before he took over Twitter X, Twitter X, which was a serious censorship operation, I mean threw me off everything, it was
Taking down content 50% of the time when governments and courts demanded it, right?
Under Elon Musk, these are official figures, 80% of court and authority requests are now taken down.
But what he's doing, he's picking fights very publicly with like Brazil and Australia and stuff.
And that's all people see.
So it's like, oh, Elon's standing up for freedom of speech.
But actually, quietly in the background, he's taking it down far more stuff than even the Twitter before took down.
And all this is part of this movement to dictate what people see and hear.
And, you know, there's two ways of doing it.
You can do it by simply banning people.
My God, look at me.
Or, and what happens if you keep banning people is eventually, you know, they see it.
What you do, this is what TwitterX is perfecting, and actually this very week, YouTube has taken a lot of the same journey, is you say, you can have your say, You can have your speech, but you can't have reach.
And that's a quote from Linda Iaccarino, the CEO of TwitterX, who's a World Economic Forum stalwart.
Who said, on TwitterX, we believe in freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.
And she also said, in the same interview, that if something is lawful, but awful, by their definition, It will be very, very difficult to find on TwitterX.
So what they're doing is they're giving the impression they believe in free speech, because you can post, but the algorithms make sure hardly anyone bloody sees it.
And I've been scanning and watching Twitter for this last couple of years, and it's getting worse and worse and worse, whereby people are posting things very, very Non-violent things.
Just observational things about what's going on, and the numbers they get are ridiculous.
I mean, I've got 663,000 followers on my page.
You play that against how many see my posts.
It's ridiculous.
It's algorithmically Censored.
And so, there are many ways they can do it, but the prime thing is controlling what people hear and see, thus controlling the perceptions they form, thus controlling the behavior that comes from that, thus dictating the nature of human society through what people think.
Absolutely.
And what he's doing, Starmer, already, what he's planning to do, we've got this Ofcom, right?
The Office of Communications, which was created by Tony Blair.
Now, if it was created by Tony Blair, it ain't good for humanity, right?
I mean, you know when Blair is lying because his lips are moving, and you know when the cult is speaking because Blair's lips are moving.
And what I've been trying to get across to people all these years is that this cult plays the long game.
It doesn't do something and then you see exactly immediately why it's being done, unless you've researched it and then you can.
So when he created Ofcom during his premiership, he knew where it was going.
And what we had under the Conservatives recently is this online safety bill, nothing to do with safety at all, And the online safety bill gave control of the internet and what's posted on the internet to Ofcom, adding to its powers.
And now he's come in and he said because of this, these street riots, we're going to have to give more powers to Ofcom.
So you can see the stepping stones to tyranny, only under Starmer it's more obvious because it's happening so fast.
Another major thing that he's going to bring in, which is one of the reasons they wanted Labour in power, is the climate change agenda.
Just to finish on this topic, you spoke about when the day was elected you posted a picture of the green and pleasant land of Britain and said bye bye, we'll see you later.
These are going to be covered with wind turbines, with solar panels and so on and we've already seen Miliband Climate, basically Climate Change Minister, Environment Minister, sorry, talking about how they're going to change British society with clean energy, quote, more expensive energy, they've pledged 11 billion to give to overseas climate change projects and so on.
How much do you think we're going to see that in the next five years of his presidency?
The attack on cars, the attack on independent energy and so on?
Well, what?
What that depends on is the level of pushback from people, which should be absolutely enormous.
We have a government led by Keir Starmer and the ministers, who I've been watching and observing for years and years and years and years and years, who are a bunch of complete morons.
They are absolute bloody morons.
And I rest my case with Ed Miliband, who's the guy in charge of climate change, and reacting to climate change.
Message to Ed, there is no such thing as human-caused climate change, and if you're idiotic enough not to know that, well, maybe that's true, or you may be just lying to us.
Because what's happened is, They want to transform, not just British society, but human society in general, global society.
And they want to force us into a dystopia.
Now, one of the things that gives us, one of the massive things that has created the industrial revolution, the industrial society, is fossil fuels.
So, if you look at human society, it's based on fossil fuels, right?
Look at it everywhere.
So, if you want to completely transform human society, you've got to take out the basis on which it is built, fossil fuels.
So you invent this whole idea of human-caused climate change, absolute scientific nonsense,
and what you then do is you put a net zero target. Now, once you set that net zero target,
and through your influence of all governments they've agreed to it,
and they start pushing towards the net zero target, you really don't have to do any more.
No, you don't.
Because to reach that target, society has to be completely transformed, because you're taking away the foundation of it, which is fossil fuels.
And so, if you, like I've said over the years, know the outcome and you'll see the journey.
The outcome is to have society broken up into very small communities, so-called 15-minute cities, which you will rarely go out of, and what they say you need will be in that area of a 15-minute walk or a 15-minute cycle ride.
And to do that, they have to stop movement.
They have to get rid of cars.
So, part of this climate change agenda being driven by this moron Miliband and the Starmer government is to, and we're seeing it already and we've seen nothing yet, is to make it almost impossible for people to have a car.
You know this thing about, we're gonna replace petrol and diesel cars with electric cars.
No they're not.
There's not the resources to replace them with electric cars.
What they want is they want people out of their petrol and diesel cars and not in any other type of car either.
Because the idea is that you don't have one.
That would create dependency then on public transport.
Dependency on what they control.
Exactly.
And whether you have it or whether you don't is their decision.
And so what you've seen already is the Starmer government saying we're going to support councils that want to bring in a 20 mile an hour speed limit.
Now, you know, I've been around London in 20-mile-an-hour speed limits because of a Labour mayor, Sadiq Khan.
It's all connected, and it's a nightmare.
It's dystopia.
You're sitting in your bloody car, or somebody's driving it, and you're going along at 20 miles an hour, and everyone else is going along at 20 miles an hour.
It's like something from a dystopian bloody movie.
But the idea is that you make having a car more expensive.
This is the Ules charge of Sadiq Khan, where people of the wrong type of car can have to pay £12.50 a day just to drive their car off their bloody drive.
This is all being compounded and compounded and compounded to create a situation where you, at that level alone, financially make it impossible for people to have their cars.
And in terms of Miliband destroying the landscape of Britain, if people think, you know, there's a lot of solar farms and uh and wind turbines uh farms etc then they ain't seen nothing yet because this guy Miliband wants to wants to cover the landscape and the seascape with this stuff and why is he doing it to solve a problem that isn't happening
So why would they be so stupid?
Why would so many people be so stupid around the world in government?
Because it's part of this agenda to completely transform human society.
They're talking about, you know, the coming in, the Starmer government said, and we're going to freeze energy prices.
Well, they're going up 10 percent, aren't they, in October?
They've taken away a lot of pensioners' winter fuel allowance, which they depended upon.
And what we've seen is not just a bunch of morons.
And of course, why morons?
I noticed this clearer than ever before during the COVID hoax.
When you saw these different governments, I mean, Trudeau in Canada, Daniel Andrews in Victoria, Australia, Ardern, all of them, Johnson, morons everywhere in government during COVID.
And they're compliant.
They haven't got the sharpness of mind or even the sharpness of bloody backbone to stand up to it.
And so you've got this government of morons here who are incredibly compliant.
You know, all over here is a civil service across this area of London that's here whatever government's in there.
And they're driving the policy. Of course, Miliband comes in and his civil servants are
dictating policy, what he can and cannot do. He's just articulating it very badly, actually.
And so we're not just going to see the psychological nature of British society change.
We're going to see it physically change because of these people.
And I say again, he is in there from 34% of the vote.
And they'll go on talking about the need to defend democracy.
Well, it's about time we bloody had some.
Because 34% of the vote to elect a tyranny is obviously stupid, ridiculous nonsense.
But that's where we stand.
So final topic that climate change or this climate change agenda is going to attack is food supply.
One of the key things they talk about justifying is farming being eroded.
They say farming is one of the major causes of it.
British farming has been attacked massively.
We've seen protests from the farmers against government policies in places like the Netherlands, which is the second biggest food exporter in Europe.
How important is that, attacking the food supply, to creating the very thing you spoke about at the top, which is dependency?
Well, that's exactly the situation.
You know, I can't emphasize enough that if you create dependency, you create control.
And who you are dependent upon is who controls you.
And so, if you can take control of the basic necessities of life, like food, and you can create manufactured scarcity, then you create dependency, because suddenly these people are deciding who eats and who doesn't.
Because, you know, you've got, as you mentioned in the Netherlands, I mean, the Netherlands is an extraordinary example of where this is meant to go.
Because, and we should always keep this in mind, They are quite happy for people to become angry and dismissive and lose total confidence in elected politicians.
They're very happy.
They're very happy.
This is another reason why morons are in government all over the world.
Because they want people to see that morons are in government.
Because they want them to Be open to the idea, which is the plan, I've been writing about it for decades, to replace elected politicians with appointed technocrats, bureaucrats, medical people, scientists, etc, etc.
And in the Netherlands, here we have the second biggest exporter of food by value in the world, And they're targeting their farmers, like, unbelievably, in an extreme way.
And they want to just take out vast amounts of Dutch farmland from producing food.
Now, this is going on all over the world.
It's no accident that Bill Gates is the biggest owner of farmland in America now.
Yeah, obviously we've seen that in this country as well.
We've seen attacks on firstly the ability for people to earn a living doing it, where supermarkets give them a pittance and a lot of them pack up shop on their own so they can't earn a living.
That's all involved.
But if I could just go back to Holland where I'm talking about the replacement of elected politicians with appointed bureaucrats, etc. A guy called Gert Wilders, who's
blotting me on TwitterX by the way, I'm very pleased about that if I've upset him because he is
supposed to be the freedom man, the man of freedom.
And his party, led by him, won the biggest number of votes in the last Dutch election.
And it was like a group then had to decide who, dominated by him, had to decide who was going to be the prime minister and ministers.
And it ends up with this man of freedom, Geert Wilders, overseeing the appointment of a former, he says in quotes, head of Dutch intelligence as the current Dutch prime minister.
Unelected?
Unelected.
And there's other people in the Dutch government who are unelected.
And what you're seeing is this movement towards this technocracy.
And the more that people can be persuaded to lose faith in elected politicians, and
they're doing it on purpose, the more open people become to this technocratic rule, this
technocratic appointed rule.
Absolutely, and it's time we push back against it, otherwise the future looks pretty bleak.
Yeah, but then we go deep into the esoteric and deep into the nature of reality and maybe
it's not as bleak as we think.
Absolutely, and this is the first episode we've done when the reveal is out.
Yeah, the reveal's out now.
And that goes into a lot of those subjects that you've spoken about and why they're happening and the nature of reality.
Yeah, and that's the whole point about the reveal, is to point out that what we call the alternative media, the centre part of it, the one that gets all the focus and all the algorithmic support and funding from people like Musk, It's regressed into the puppet show of left-right politics, when the conspiracy is absolutely enormous.
Even this guy and this level is way, way down the scale of the hierarchy.
I mean, if you can see someone in the public arena, even Gates and Schwab and all these people, they're still gophers.
They might be powerful over those below them in the hierarchy, but they're still gophers to those above them.
And it's much bigger than people think.
And one of the problems with the way that I say the alternative media has been hijacked since COVID.
The way that this myopia focus on left-right politics, in fact right-wing politics really, in America particularly, it's focused attention on the myopia.
Was it Trump or is it Harris?
When actually the conspiracy is absolutely colossal.
But it's out here, not only that you see the scale of what's going on, you see the answers to it.
You're not going to find him there.
Oh, Trump's the saviour, okay.
Well, say he is.
I don't think he is for a second, but say he is.
What happens in four years' time?
You know, we're not going to sort out a problem by handing more power to an individual.
We're going to solve the problem by taking it back and dropping the fault lines of divide and rule.
So we have a united understanding that we're actually looking at the same foe.
100%.
Thank you as always.
Cheers mate.
Nice one.
Right, thank you very much for joining us this evening here at this Dot Connector special from Parliament Square in London, wherever you are in the world.
We hope you've enjoyed tonight's episode and we'll be back with you next Friday at 5pm.
Until then, take care.
I write because I'm inspired to write.
I can go Months and months and months and months and months doing all the other things and then bang I get the feeling I've got to start writing a book.
It's happened over and over again for 35 years and once I start then the synchronicity begins that brings to me information in many and various ways and forms that take me deeper and deeper into Into the unseen, into the unknown, than I've ever been before.
And so, the reveal is the next stage of that.
Because, humility, common sense, tells you, whatever we know, there's always more to know.