All Episodes
Previous Next
May 28, 2024 - David Icke
17:22
UK Election Called For July 4th & The Timing Is No Accident - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We all lead busy and sometimes stressful lives.
If you're experiencing pain and searching for relief, this can be even more devastating.
It was more than pain, it was extreme agony.
Are you sick and tired of trying drugs?
Only to find the troublesome side effects like fatigue become unbearable.
And I was desperate and...
I didn't think that anything could help, really.
Endless expensive gadgets and potions that offer pain relief but deliver none.
Well, did you know there's a natural and easy way to live pain-free?
With Althea Finch, the pain-free specialist.
Well, there is a future.
That's all I can say and I didn't think I had one.
Wow.
Really?
Wow.
Good.
Wonderful.
No one should have to live with pain.
And block your body's own healing power with Althea's pain-free method.
Visit painfreedom.co.uk and let Althea guide you towards your new pain-free future.
Althea Finch, the pain-free specialist.
What is the role of politics in the current political situation?
So we mentioned politics and the irrelevance of that and the people on public display
certainly are not the ones in positions of power.
Ties us into our final story tonight, which yesterday there was an announcement there was going to be an election here in the UK, which is the choice between idiot and idiot, doesn't matter.
But it does matter to an extent in terms of the acceleration of the agenda.
I saw your tweet this morning that the same agenda will continue, but under one it can happen a lot quicker because there's going to be less pushback.
We're almost certainly expecting a Labour landslide, so therefore Starmer to be Prime Minister here in the UK, which means...
Green agenda, carbon zero, you know, the trans agenda, so many of them can get accelerated at a much faster pace than they have been able to.
Do you think there's something in timing of this?
Or do you think this is just, you know?
Oh, I think there's something in time, for sure.
It's kind of thing, everything is about perception, building perception.
So Rishi Sunak, decided and completely left fielded most of his party by saying, we're going to have an election in July, in early July.
And then he walks out of Downing Street to make a speech to the press live on television in a massive rainstorm.
So he's speaking, and he's soaked.
And you can see his suit getting darker and darker with the damp and the water.
He was wringing wet at the end.
Now, if you put the weather forecast in, all right, and you're the government, you can get onto the weather office, What's the weather going to be like at that time?
And they would say it's going to be pissing down, right?
So you go out and you make a speech in a rainstorm.
Yeah.
Now, everybody, all the press and the television media, they've got an umbrella.
They're doing all the prelims with an umbrella.
The person being interviewed and the host.
And then after Sunak has turned around and walked back into Downing Street, dripping sodding wet.
As they were carrying on the television broadcast, the door of Downing Street opens and a stream of people come out with umbrellas to go home.
And you're thinking, Are they stupid?
Yes, they can be unbelievably stupid.
But are they that stupid?
No.
So, What did that say about Rishi Sunak standing in the bloody rain?
That impacts perception of it.
Yep.
Because the idea is that Starmer gets in.
Now, we can hope for a miracle, but That's the idea.
And Starmer, like I said earlier, is a member of the Trilateral Commission, this David Rockefeller-created organisation.
He is a gopher for the cult.
And he will bring in the cult agenda.
Let's just ask you quickly, you have to choose now between Davos or Westminster?
Davos.
Why?
Because Westminster is too constrained.
And, you know, it's closed and we're not having many... Once you get out of Westminster, whether it's Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see working with in the future.
Westminster's just a tribal shouting place.
In the same way, we're looking at Biden and Trump in America currently.
We'll see where that turns out.
And you see the same situation.
The Republicans have a natural constituency that would vote for them.
That doesn't want this agenda.
The Conservative Party in this country has a significant number of people that it needs to vote for it, its core, that don't want this agenda, don't want this great reset, right?
Whereas the other two, the Democrats and the Labour Party, they don't have anything like the same level of pushback in terms of the Democrats, quite the opposite.
And that allows them, although the Conservative Party has been pushing in this direction, although of course the Republican Party pushes in the same direction despite its rhetoric.
It can't move as fast because it's got pushback, whereas the Labour Party, if Starmer comes in, will be able to move this forward very much quicker.
And if you want to look at one aspect of it, look at the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who is a Labour Party Mayor of London, and what he's doing in terms of All these cameras going up to police this ultra low emission zone, which means that Londoners, the whole of the greater area of London now, have to pay £12.50 a day to drive their own car off the driveway or down the street, if it's not of a certain kind of car.
And you look at the wokeness And also the financial incompetence, by the way, of Labour councils that dominate the urban areas of Britain.
And you'll see what the Starmer period would be.
But this is the point.
Because of the way the political system has been stitched up, where basically you have a two party system, It means that if Party A is in for long enough in government, and you don't like what they've done, and the Tory Party have been appalling, then your only choice is to go to Party B, and that in Britain is the Labour Party.
And there'll be a lot of people who will vote Labour to get rid of the Tories, Who won't vote Labour with enthusiasm, they'll do it because it's the only way of getting the Tories out.
And what I would say to you is that if you think it's bad now, and it is, and the Tories are appalling, Then you wait till Starmer comes in and see what he does.
One of the things you're going to see is more and more landscapes destroyed by wind turbines.
That's going to go crazy in pursuit of solving a problem that's not actually happening, which is kind of breathtaking, but true.
And so many other things that People who voted for the Conservative Party before, and don't want to happen, will happen on steroids if Starmer gets in.
One area I think is really interesting as well, and on the timing, was I watched a podcast Andrew Bridgton did a few weeks ago with Dr Malik, and he talked about the fact we're at war with Russia now.
And how he spoke to a Russian diplomat who said, you know, we know the missiles being fired from Ukraine to our territory are supplied by you and being run by British forces and so on.
And he talked about how Rishi Sunak had said he doesn't want to be a wartime Prime Minister.
And then I saw something this morning, which was about how Starmer will be a wartime Prime Minister in the same way Blair was when that Labour government in 97 were elected with, at that point, great hope from a lot of people to vote for him.
Do you think there could be any timing in that?
The fact that, you know, they want to accelerate that a little bit and he's not the man to do it.
Starmer is.
Well, here's an irony very, very appropriate to what you just said.
You know, we talked earlier about Tony Blair being talked about as a possible successor to Klaus Schwab.
But when Starmer gets in as Prime Minister officially, the real Prime Minister is going to be Tony Blair.
Yep.
Because Starmer is a glove puppet for Tony Blair.
Tony Blair's policies will be brought into our lives, if we stand for it, By Starmer.
Tony Blair's policies will be introduced by Starmer.
He'll be running the show.
Well, we spoke, didn't we, when Cynic put David Cameron in that position, that that was setting a precedent potentially for when Starmer gets in for Tony Blair to have a government position and be Mayor Lord without being elected.
We talked about that, didn't we, a few months ago.
Yeah, well, that's a possibility, but it doesn't even have to go that far.
He just has to pull the strings behind the scenes.
And, you know, Starmer is a disaster.
And I tell you, it was interesting.
First of all, there's Sunak.
Getting absolutely drenched making a speech.
And no one was listening to it.
They just wanted to know if there was going to be an election or not.
And once he said that, everybody switched off anyway.
So he's getting drenched, which is a real perceptual, implanted perception of him.
And then they went to Starman making his reply speech.
And he's inside.
And in front of him is this big word Change.
Now, think of Obama.
I mean, that's the obvious one.
But so many of these politicians, when they seek to replace a government, talk about change.
We need change.
And this is how it works.
It's such a perceptual scam.
For most people, because of this one-party state masquerading as democracy, And the way it's taking the country and the world.
Most people are having lives they would rather change.
You know, a lot of people are having shit lives, and especially now more and more challenges financially, etc.
And they want to change.
The way their lives are.
So they come in, I'm standing for change.
We need change.
And you can fall for it by going, yeah, this is shit.
So I mean, yeah, we need change, mate.
Yeah.
And this is Obama, of course.
And the idea is that the change means, they're talking about, that the change is better for you.
Yeah.
But the only change is the advancement of the agenda, the Great Reset, to deeper and deeper levels of extreme.
So your life's not going to get better, it's going to get worse through this change he's talking about.
It's such a scam.
I mean... I mean...
I wouldn't buy a new car of Keir Starmer, let alone use one.
I mean, the man is such a blatant gopher and so blatantly unintelligent, just like Sunak.
And then you ask yourself, why is it that so many stupid people end up in positions of apparent power, political power.
Because they're stupid, they are completely at the mercy of those around them, one step back in the shadows or deeper, who tell them what to do, because they haven't got a clue.
Another way to look at Stalmer and know that he's clearly the chosen one for them now is the systematic destruction of the Tory party in the last two, three years.
I remember when Stalmer got the leadership of the Labour Party, he was unelectable, he was hated, he was despised.
He had all the Jimmy Savile questions behind him and his record as CPS.
And then since then, you've just seen The Tories literally commit election suicide time and time again, and go so far away from what would be considered a traditional conservative value, if you like, that it's made him, all of a sudden, the great option.
It's interesting, if you look back at different elections and changes in government, Going way back.
You'll see her, not every time, but a lot of the time, you'll see that recurring theme.
The party they don't want to win suddenly is in disarray.
Yeah.
So if you look at the period where they wanted Margaret Thatcher in, from 1979 to I think it was 1990 when she was thrown out by her own party, by the way.
The Labour Party throughout that whole period was in absolute disarray, chaos, and was not considered by the electorate to be electable.
Therefore, she kept getting in, even though lots of people didn't like her, she kept getting back in.
And then when Blair became leader of the Labour Party, after the death of the previous leader, Suddenly the Tory party's in disarray.
And he got a landslide.
And while he's going through election after election, as Prime Minister, the Tory party's in disarray.
And then you see the reverse of that.
They have to keep changing the party.
Otherwise, you'd realize it's a one-party state, so they have to keep moving it around.
They just make sure that there's chaos in the other party, so you'll vote for the one they want.
Yeah, we've seen it time and time again.
Hell over and over.
There's a lot of things that I've said over the years which were perceived to be crazy
and then suddenly.
They start to move mainstream.
I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
What is real?
How do you define real?
If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
▲
Export Selection