All Episodes
Previous Next
April 19, 2024 - David Icke
01:24:17
No Matter The Consequences, Do What Is Right - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, I'm Sarah Jane Smith.
Find your path by doing my new Millionaire's Mindset Hypnosis.
I help you to break any subconscious thought patterns that are stopping you from obtaining all of your goals.
The truth will then come to the forefront of your mind that you are worthy and deserving of achieving everything.
You'll start to attract the right people into your life.
Opportunities will open up as a result.
Financial success is a natural outcome from being clear and focused.
Everything will literally fall into place when you do what you love.
People are already enjoying mind-blowing success with this incredible session.
So what are you waiting for?
Hello everybody and welcome to Dot Connector.
Joining me in the studio this week, we have Bono.
How you doing?
Um, well, I'm just looking at the shirt, mate.
What is it about you and the shirts?
Mate, iconic subscribers, that's what it's for.
On the comments, I was told last week to bring back the shirts.
Oh, right.
And it's gonna get expensive, because this is the last out there one I've got.
Right.
So I'm gonna have to start recycling, or buying new ones.
Okay.
So, yeah.
I'll keep the glasses on, then.
Nice.
We've got to have a laugh, mate.
I'll tell you why.
Because the world's freaking mad, as we're going to talk about.
You've got to laugh or you'll cry.
Yeah, absolutely.
And this week it feels more on a knife edge than probably ever before.
Ever since the Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria, you were kind of waiting, weren't you, for something.
They alluded to the fact they were going to do something, and then obviously this weekend that something happened.
Yeah, well, it's like...
It's like they're playing out a script.
And I think it's important to point out again that the global cult has no borders.
And just because someone stands up proclaiming what should happen in relation to Iran or as the leader, supreme leader of Iran, doesn't mean that they necessarily have their people's first interests at heart.
Same with Netanyahu.
And if people would just visualize a cult in the shadows and coming down from that same cult, you hit all the different leaders.
And that's why they kind of move as one unit.
And part of the scam is to control all sides.
So you've had obviously the appalling Bombing of Gaza by Israel after an attack that the Israeli government clearly allowed to happen.
Probably orchestrated.
To give them the opportunity and the excuse to do what they're doing.
And then, you know, It's like, what is this Israel?
It's this tiny country with, I don't know, 9, 10 million people, and yet it's constantly causing aggravation in the world and conflict in the world.
Not just within its own borders and bordering countries either, by the way.
And so you then have, during the bombing of Gaza, They bombed the Iranian consulate in Syria.
Now, there's only one reason you're doing that, and that's to, as we talked in the last Dot Connector, to poke Iran in the chest to get a reaction.
And of course they got a reaction.
Then you look at the defense system of Israel, paid for by the United States taxpayer, which made the Iranian attack very marginal in terms of impact.
And then Iran says, oh, well, that's it now.
We're not doing any more.
It's like, you know, this game going on.
And then Israel says, well, we've got to respond to the attack.
And you've had Cameron from Britain, and you've had the German coming into Israel this week to say, oh, can you just calm it down?
We support you, and you defend yourself, but just calm it down a little bit, a little bit, if you don't mind.
And Netanyahu has said, we'll decide what happens.
Because they answer to a master, and Netanyahu answers to a master, to which these other characters, like Cameron, also answer.
So, you know, they do what they like, because Israel, from its government point of view, is there as an antagonistic triggerer of other happenings and conflicts.
So now I read that Israel won't respond to the Iranian attack until after the Passover, which ends at the end of the month, April the 30th.
And that brings me to another level of what's going on, which is that You've got these different religions, well they claim they're different anyway, they call themselves different names, and they all claim that their God is on their side.
And they all have their own religious texts, like the Bible and the Koran, which they kind of follow and interpret it depending on how they want things to happen.
And it's amazing how God is always on their side, no matter what side they're on.
And this religious division is very much at the heart of this in so many ways.
First of all, this is Netanyahu quoting the Bible in support of bombing the innocent in Gaza.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Bible says that there is a time for peace and a time for war.
This is a time for war, a war for our common future.
Today we draw a line between the forces of civilization and the forces of barbarism.
It is a time for everyone to decide where they stand.
Israel will stand against the forces of barbarism until victory.
I hope and pray that civilized nations everywhere will back this fight.
Because Israel's fight is your fight.
Because if Hamas and Iran's axis of evil win, you will be their next target.
So Netanyahu's quoting his God, and then the supreme leader in Iran is quoting his God, and I'm hearing now, seeing reports, that Israel won't respond to the Iranian attack until after Passover.
And what is Passover?
Well, Passover is in the Jewish religious belief system, That says God, who wanted to protect his chosen people, passed over the houses of Jewish people in Egypt when he was killing all the first-born Egyptian babies.
Nice man!
Lovely.
Nice man!
And then, of course, Moses led the Here's people, the chosen people, into the wilderness via a red sea that opened up and let them through.
I think it would be a bit soggy, wouldn't it, when you go through there?
But anyway, and then the Egyptians went after him and the sea closed.
He's a nice man, this god.
He's a bloodthirsty tyrant, actually.
And then on the other side, you've got the Iranian Muslim god, Allah, who also seems very bloodthirsty to me.
It's certainly the way he's interpreted, interpreted by many people.
And then you've got, and this is another thing with religion, you tend to have the religion created And then the religion divides into warring factions.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
So, you know, you had the religion of Rome, Christian religion of Rome, and then you had the rebellion and the Protestant rebellion and all that stuff.
And with With Islam, you had Islam, the time of Mohammed, and then there was this very quick schism between Shia and Sunni.
And then, as I said a few minutes ago, how religion is so much at the heart of this conflict, or religion is being used to be at the heart of this conflict.
So you have the Sunni aspect of Islam that is centered in Saudi Arabia, and you have
the Shia aspect which is overwhelmingly centered in Iran, and so they don't bloody like each
other.
And so if we go on being led by a religious belief system that is unquestioned and unyielding,
So that I am a Muslim so I think this and I by definition don't like you and I am a Jewish so therefore this is what I believe and I don't like you because you you know believe something different to me and this is all this conflict that goes on between between Israel and well at least the The Islamic world, not necessarily the leaders of the Islamic world, like Saudi Arabia, because they're very close to Israel, much closer than people believe.
But you've got this schism, this built-in religious schism, which just goes on replicating itself.
And so Netanyahu is saying, my God is driving me to do this, because he says this, and the other God is driving them to do this, and so it goes on.
Whenever you look at religion, you're looking at a classic divide and rule.
Because if you can get a group of people to believe one thing, and a group of people to believe another, vehemently, then bringing them into conflict is easy.
And so we have now this situation in the last few days with Hezbollah out of Lebanon attacking Israel and Hezbollah claims to represent the Shia group belief system In Lebanon, which answers to basically Iran, because that's the Shia central kind of point.
Ambulances operate side by side with armoured vehicles.
Drones and missiles have just hit this military base in northern Israel.
An attack launched from Lebanon, just a few kilometres away, and claimed by Hezbollah.
The IDF says four civilians were among the wounded.
As a result of the attack, six soldiers were severely injured, two moderately injured, and six others were lightly injured.
In response, the Israeli Air Force says its jets struck Hezbollah infrastructure in eastern Lebanon just north of Baalbek on Wednesday morning, about 100 kilometres from the border.
That's on top of two other locations it targeted earlier that day in the south near Nakora and Yarin.
The IDF says it's where Hezbollah fired from, publishing these images of the Air Force's operations.
For its part, the militant group says it attacked northern Israel in response to the killing of three of its fighters, including a local commander on Lebanese soil on Tuesday.
The border is a stage for near-daily exchanges of fire between Israel and Hezbollah, allied with Iran and Hamas.
More than 300 people have been killed on the Lebanese side, including dozens of civilians.
On the Israeli side, the death toll stands at 18, including soldiers and civilians.
Then you ask the question, why Shia and why Sunni?
Yeah.
And what it comes down to, long, long ago, is a disagreement on the succession, the right of succession.
From Mohammed.
From Mohammed.
So you take a breath and you look at it, And it's an absolute mess, because it's a psychological mess.
You've got two vehement belief systems, with Israel and the Islamic world.
Not necessarily the leaders, like I say.
And then you've got this psychological division, belief system division within Islam, And, you know, if you were a manipulator who wanted to play countries and groups of people off against each other, you have the perfect, perfect scenario, and it's now being used.
And if it goes on tit for tat, building up, Then, you know, the world's going to be a very dangerous place soon.
Which is the idea, isn't it?
I saw you put a meme out which said, um, lunatic with a beard attacks a lunatic without a beard, and that just broke it down pretty simply.
That's exactly how it is.
Yeah, well, what it was, was, um, the Supreme Leader of, um, Iran was making a speech about, um, you know, with, with Allah on our side, we'll, we'll have victory.
And then it cut away to lots of people with beards in the crowd, you know, cheering.
And then you've got the clean-shaven Netanyahu, etc.
Actually, there's lots of beards in Israel as well.
And the point I was making is the beards and the clean-shaven are both controlled by the same force.
Yeah, absolutely.
You know, this is the thing.
It's a stage show.
It's vaudeville.
But the four guys...
Are the audience.
The four guys are the populations of Iran and the populations of Lebanon, the population of Israel, the population of Gaza.
They're all the four guys for these assets of the cult that are playing this stage show and presenting it as random events where people are just reacting and, oh, they did this, so we're going to do that.
No, no, no, no.
You're reading a script.
And there's many, many things that come from this.
First of all, as I've said many times, if you're born into a Muslim family, you're almost certainly going to be a Muslim.
You're born into a Hindu family, you're almost certainly going to be a Hindu.
You're born into a vehement Christian family, you're almost certainly going to be a Christian.
So these belief systems are not organic.
No, they're hereditary.
You know, I've looked at everything and I've come to my own conclusion.
No, no, these are inherited.
And often, more than bloody often, they are imposed by fear and by guilt.
This is what will happen if you don't, you know, follow the religion.
And so, you've got that level of belief system control, Which you play off against each other, and you identify your so-called opposition by your own belief system against their belief system.
But then you go to this other political level, where you've got Netanyahu.
I mean, how many times has this guy been Prime Minister of Israel?
It's insane!
And he gets himself into a situation where He's completely lost the public.
I mean, there's massive protests in Israel against him.
And yet, somehow, he kind of returns.
Yeah, he does.
Somehow he manages to retrieve the situation, even though great chunks of the Israeli population don't want him, he ends up as leader again.
Why is that?
Because there's some other force pulling the strings that makes that happen.
If he was left to his own devices, he'd have been gone long ago.
And then you go to Iran, they have this supreme leader, Because he's a religious bloody leader.
Don't, you know, I've been seeing postings on the internet where people are saying, oh, it's pathetic, you know.
Like if you support Israel, repost if you support Iran.
I mean, oh, what?
This is absolutely ridiculous.
And then you have other postings I've seen where, you know, I hope that Iran wins and then they can free Gaza.
And I posted something in response to one of those saying, well, when they're going to free Iran?
Yeah, absolutely.
You know what I mean?
You've got these leaders, these tyrants that impose their will through their religious beliefs on the population.
And the population submit to those few leaders, and then the leaders play it off against each other on behalf of the cult.
This is how it works.
So then you ask the question, so what do we do about it?
Well, number one, stop believing in a religion just because that's all you've ever bloody heard.
Start questioning the religion.
Start seeing if it stands up.
If it does, well, good for you.
Start looking at other ways of seeing the world other than what your religion has told you all your bloody life.
And stop cheering bloody tyrants.
As if somehow you don't have the ability to work out that actually the tyrants are all part of the same game and you are the four guys of it.
Whether you are Israeli or whether you are Iranian, whether you are Palestinian, you're all four guys of this vaudeville game which is playing your mind.
And the only way you're going to get out of this situation you're in is to take control of your mind back.
And that means questioning everything.
Questioning your religious belief, your religious leaders, the political leaders that I've given you to follow.
Take your bloody mind back, because if you don't, then whatever god you bloody worship, you are going to be in for a nightmare future if this mob is allowed to go on doing what it's doing, and it's allowed to go on by your decision to give your mind away to someone else.
That's why religions have always been acceptable, because they're limiting, and they put people into different strands, don't they?
You've written extensively since the mid-90s about World War III, and the three key countries being Russia, Iran, and China, and there's three fronts, then, across all of them.
There's Russia with Ukraine, there's Taiwan with China, and there's now this Israel and Iran.
And Russia, I believe, came out, Putin came out and said if the US attacked Iran in response to this, they'd support them.
So I saw that and obviously I was in America Saturday and I could see when the story was breaking and it was that France, US and UK had helped defend Israel and I thought well there's the fault lines drawn on that side and then you see them drawn on the other side as well and it's clear they're going to just use this as a manipulation to try and bring that conflict about and there's three trigger points now and it's which one first isn't it?
Yeah, I mean, I've been saying since long, long ago that the plan was, and you know, I've always emphasized, as the years have gone on, this is the plan.
It doesn't have to happen.
There are eight billion of us now, apparently.
There's a handful of them, and clearly it doesn't have to happen.
We're back to what I said a few minutes ago.
It's playing out because the minds of the population is being played out by this same cult, and it's done through divide and rule.
And divide and rule is real kind of easy, and creating wars is real easy.
If I come on now and I try to hit you, you're going to defend yourself, right?
Now we've got a fight.
And it's the same with a war.
You invade someone, the invaded nation responds, you have a war.
Other people who like that nation or like this nation start piling in.
And you've got, eventually, a world war.
This is how it all works.
And yet, the leaders of all these different countries are answerable to the same force.
They are making it happen.
And so, a third world war doesn't have to happen.
It happens if you give your mind away.
If you, for instance, choose to fight for Russia, or you choose to fight for Ukraine.
We used to have this saying in the 1960s when all the stuff was going on about Vietnam.
What would happen if there was a war and no one turned up?
Well, you know, it's a kind of, you know, cliche phrase, but let's think about that.
Yeah.
Wars are fought and waged because people fight and wage them.
If we didn't, they couldn't happen.
So in the end, the whole game is all a perceptual game.
These few leaders who are fronts for this cult manipulate the population to believe that a war is necessary or an invasion is necessary.
And once you've started that, once you've done that, the other side defend themselves and away we bloody go.
All the way through history this has happened.
And if, you know, if you got Russians sitting around a table with Ukrainians and just chill, okay, just have a chat, you'd realize that actually what unites you is far greater than what divides you.
That what you want out of life is basically the same You want, you know, enough to pay the bills and put food on the table.
You want the best for your kids.
All these things.
And what gets in the way is the belief system.
Once people say, I am a Ukrainian, or I am a Russian, the game has started.
No, you are an expression of infinite awareness, having a brief human experience, called a Russian and a Ukrainian.
If we can take the self-identification with the labels of a human life, we can take them away, I'm Ukrainian, I'm Russian, I'm Palestinian, I'm Jewish, and go...
We're all one consciousness having a brief human experience.
It changes everything.
Then suddenly, all the divisions and all the belief systems which are all happening here in the world of the five senses, they lose their power.
And you say, well, actually, why am I fighting you?
Well, I'm fighting you because he told me.
And why are you fighting me?
Well, I'm fighting you because he told me.
What?
Yeah.
And again, religion is such a powerful focus of belief and limitation and sense of identity that once you fall for that, Then the rest usually follows.
Well, you mentioned history there.
I was thinking, were we taught in history in school?
I'm sure it was inaccurate, but the leaders at the time, King Richard III and all that, they were in the front of the battle, going into the battle against whoever they were fighting.
I wonder how different things would be if Macron was at the front of the military, or Richie was at the front of the military.
Biden would get lost on the way, to be fair, probably.
But Biden would probably end up in mid-Africa somewhere, trying to find Israel.
Yeah, but this is the interesting thing that comes out of your question, Jay.
Okay, you start with people leading the troops.
Yeah.
Right.
Okay.
And then you go to people in the background telling the troops to do what they wouldn't do.
So, you know, as I said in a book ages ago, you know, Tony Blair, when he was Prime Minister, and boy, George Bush, we're going to do this, we're going to do that.
Well, you ain't going to do anything.
You're sipping coffee in Downing Street and the fricking White House, mate.
You're sending others to do what we are bloody doing.
So then you've got that stage of the people calling the shots never see the shots, right?
And then you go to the next stage is where they're going, which is AI runs it.
Yep.
So you don't even need your troops anymore because you've got artificial intelligence, you've got robots, you've got drones.
And the number of people needed to wage war, death and destruction on the population, is now becoming tiny compared with what it was before.
You've got no troops to move or anything like that.
And that's where AI is going.
The AI war.
The AI that decides who lives and who dies.
In other words, who controls AI.
And that's a whole new, a whole big area that we need to explore at some point.
Yeah.
What do you think about, you know, I saw three different aspects to this attack.
One is that it was, if you were looking at it from a genuine geopolitical, there isn't a conspiracy, you would say it was Iran trying to prove a point, but obviously that's ignored.
Second one is it's them putting the fault lines in place for the war.
And then the third one, which I saw was interesting, I saw three world leaders talk about it, Lord Cameron or David Cameron being one, which is this has given Israel an opportunity now to not do anything crazy and Bring its public image back up, which is currently on the floor.
People around the world that wouldn't have said anything about Israel a year ago are now calling it out because of what it's doing in Gaza.
So by them not reacting, does it kind of show that we're not all bad?
Do you think that could be something in it as well?
It's an opportunity for them to sort of rehash their image?
Well it might be, but you see you're dealing with fanatics and you're dealing with egos
that expand beyond the universe in terms of people like Netanyahu, where they can't lose
face.
So I can't lose face by doing nothing.
And the other problem that Netanyahu has is the continuing slaughter in Gaza, which has
continued and it shows no signs currently of going away.
So in terms of public image, he's not got a lot working for him at the moment because
of his own actions.
And the one good thing about this, and it is the one good thing because the rest of it is horrific, is that it has freed people to start saying in some cases what they weren't saying before because they bought the story that Israel must not be criticized.
Or because they were terrified of the consequences of criticizing Israel, which must not be criticized.
And what we have now are a lot more people speaking their mind.
I mean, you well know that, well, since 1995, I've been cancelled all over the world, different places, not least in my own country.
for saying about Israel what people are now saying.
And a lot of the people who cheered and demanded that I be cancelled are now saying some, some of what I was saying at the time that got me cancelled.
And that is that There is this trickery, and it's an old trick and it's constantly used, but it's losing its power.
And that is, you are targeting in your exposure a tiny group of people that have taken over the Jewish community worldwide, basically.
Not least out of Israel.
And you're targeting them, and you're identifying them, and you are exposing them.
Their response is, what you're saying is, all Jewish people are doing this.
No, no, no.
Not saying that.
What I've been saying is, Jewish people, more than anyone else, need to know what you're doing, and how they are being manipulated by you, while you claim to be leading them.
But that defense mechanism, This anti-Semitism defense mechanism, it is currently losing its power.
Yeah, it is.
And people are now much more willing to say what they wouldn't say before, which some of us were saying at the time.
With the consequences that followed.
But I don't care, because speaking your truth is all that matters to me.
The consequences will take care of themselves.
Yeah, it feels like there's been a split, hasn't there?
It's kind of like when you spoke about, like, say, the vaccine.
Some people went, actually, and made a mistake.
Some people doubled down.
Kind of feels the same here.
You've got people like, you know, I can't think of one to be fair, but people that are starting to question it when they weren't before and you've got your Shapiros and people like that that have gone, they're not even pretending anymore that they're remotely not just Israel Stooges and it's kind of this big split and it's quite incredible to see really a lot of people that are really showing themselves up for what they really are.
Well it's quite interesting, there's quite a lot of Jewish people in the MAM, the Mainstream Alternative Media, by ratio, and it's very difficult to find one that isn't coming out vehemently for Israel and condemning anyone who isn't.
The only one in that MAM who is remotely the other way has been Tate, but Tate's a Muslim, so he would have to be like that.
But yeah, you've got your Shapiros, you've got Lawrence Foxes, you've got Juilliard Brewers, Dave Rubins, you've got all those people that are massively Tim Pauls, all those people that are really pro-Israel.
But how can you justify genocide?
How can you justify it?
I don't get it.
Even if you were Israeli, even if you were Jewish, even if you were absolutely believed in the right to have a state, surely you can't justify what they're doing.
Yeah, well that's an interesting point.
You know, by their By their words, shall you know them, as well as their actions, if you look at the Western country reactions, leader reactions, to what Israel is doing in Gaza, it's all very, oh, well, we need a ceasefire, because, you know, let the aid in, you know, all that stuff.
It's no, hey, what are you bloody doing?
Bombing the innocent?
On the scale you are, and killing the numbers, what are you doing?
Right?
So, that's not there.
Well, we want a ceasefire, but Israel has the right to defend itself, right?
And then, after Israel has bombed the consulate in Syria, the Iranian consulate, Iran responds.
This is outrageous!
Right?
Oh!
You can't do that!
Oh dear.
What it's telling you is, what's that old saying?
You know who controls you by who you can't criticise.
That's absolutely right.
If any country bombed the consulate of Britain, France, America, there'd be war.
That would be war.
That would be an act of war.
It wouldn't be a, we'll think about it, we'll respond, that'd be gone.
There'd be planes in the sky an hour later.
You can fire missiles at Syria, no problem, which they did even during the Trump era.
You do what Israel is doing and has done so many times.
I mean, people will forget.
While all this has been going on over the years, recent years, every now and again, Israel's been bombing Syria.
Yeah, and Lebanon.
Well, where's the reaction to that?
Oh no, Israel has the right to defend itself.
Well, Syria hasn't attacked it!
No.
You know, you can see by the reactions how, you know, these Western leaders, it's reached a point of public opinion in relation to Gaza.
Well, they can't just say nothing anymore, which is their preferred state.
They've got to criticize, but as lightly as possible.
And then Iran, whoa!
It's terrible what they've done!
How many people in Israel died as a result of the Iranian attack?
How many have died in Gaza while you've been sitting on your hands with your bloody mouth zipped?
It's pathetic.
It is pathetic to watch them.
And, you know, I don't think for a second it's an accident that Lord Cameron, David Cameron, the Prime Minister, who with Obama orchestrated, or oversaw anyway, but they oversaw and agreed to the mass bombing of Libya, which has turned it into a basket case, He comes forward, is brought forward to be Foreign Secretary, unelected by the way, Lord Cameron, to oversee British foreign policy at this time.
Not an accident at all.
He was also the Prime Minister when they went into Syria as well.
Yeah, he absolutely was.
So fingerprints all over the Middle East.
Yeah, I mean, you know, Lord Cameron is barely one-dimensional, right?
He's got no substance, nothing.
But he's a very pliable character who will do whatever he's told.
He'll do whatever he thinks is right for him.
And in terms of standing up for morality and standing up for justice and fairness, well, What's that, he'll ask you.
So he's the perfect man to be in charge of, or at least official charge, of British foreign policy at this time, absolutely.
And he would have been brought in for that reason.
It wouldn't shock me, you mentioned it before as well, when Labour win the next election, which is going to be in the next, what, four or five months, if they bring Blair in and the precedent's been set, because this whole Middle Eastern catastrophe started with him in 2003.
So that wouldn't be unsurprising either, would it?
Well, you know, what you have very blatantly in country after country after country after country, but blatantly in Britain now, is a one party state.
So you have a Conservative Party led by this unelected, weak, weak man, Rishi Sunak, who, I mean, Liz Truss is not brain of bloody Britain, but when the Conservative Party voted her to be leader, and thus Prime Minister of Britain, To replace Johnson from a cult point of view, they made the wrong choice, right?
We don't want her.
We want Sunak, who stood against her for the leadership.
So what then happens is they create financial bloody chaos as a result of policies and or what they say was resulting from policies of trust and this chancellor she appointed.
And she lasted next to no time.
She's lasted less time than any other Prime Minister.
56 days.
Oh, it was a very, very short period.
And so, oh, we need another leader now.
Who can... Oh, Rishi Sunak!
We've got our man!
Took a bit of time.
It took a few days, but we got him.
Because he is another one, like Cameron, who has no compass whatsoever.
He just does what's right for him and what is right for his political expediency.
And so, On the other side, you have the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, ironically named after Keir Hardie, the creator of the Labour Party, which was created in the earliest time of the 20th century.
To represent the working classes against the bosses.
Yeah.
And, of course, what happens, what always happens, is it becomes infiltrated and taken over and becomes a vehicle for the, quote, bosses.
And any benefit for the, quote, working classes is long gone.
And this pivotal point Where the last vestige of the old Labour Party, what was left of it by then anyway, after Wilson in the 60s, Aaron Wilson, Prime Minister and absolutely not a Labour Prime Minister.
was the Tony Blair period, because that's when they literally went from the Labour Party to what Blair called New Labour, which was an obliteration of everything the old Labour Party, what was left of it, stood for.
And it became another Conservative Party.
And of course he was in for a long time as Prime Minister.
And we now have reached a point where we literally very visibly have a one-party state, except you have the Conservative Party.
Which has a natural constituency of support, which doesn't want a lot of this stuff.
So he has to be more circumspect and a little bit more, well, we better tell them what they want to hear, even though we intend to do the opposite.
We can't go that fast because there'll be a reaction.
But the Labour Party, they'll do what they want.
They don't have that pushback that the Conservative Party has from its natural constituency.
And so when Starmer comes in, it's going to be Joe Biden's regime on steroids.
We're going to see not only a foreign policy that is straight off the script of the cult.
I mean, Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral Commission.
One of these organizations going way back to 1973, started by Sabinu Brzezinski and David Rockefeller, which is a cult operation that manipulates cult policy into being.
He's a member of that.
He's the leader of the Labour Party, party of the working class.
And so when he comes in, You're going to have a cult foreign policy.
You're going to have a cult immigration policy.
Open the gates.
You're going to have a cult climate change policy, which is going to be More and more wind turbines and solar panels all over the countryside destroying landscapes.
It's going to be everything that we don't want massively extended and made more extreme when he comes in.
You know, it's like last one turn out the light if he gets in.
And again, because of this political structure, where you have party A or you have party B, and if you don't like party A, we'll go for party B. And if you don't like what they've done, well, you've only got to go back to party A. It's all you can do.
It means that The whoever's in power, the cult agenda is going to move on.
But it also means that if you don't like what the Conservative Party has done under Johnson, and then briefly Liz Truss, and then Ritchie Sunak, if you want to get rid of them, you've got to go here.
You've got to go to the Labour Party.
And the Labour Party is going to be worse than them.
But you can't get them out, you don't like, unless you have the Labour Party, which is worse than them.
This is how the political system stitches you up, and it's why politics is not the answer, it's the problem.
And then you have the Reform Party in Britain.
Oh, God.
You know, one of the major characters is Nigel Farage and what have you.
And they are just a repackaged version of the same system.
They're the Tories, really, aren't they?
Yeah, I saw an interview with Farage this week In which he was condemning the cover up of what's happened to people who took the COVID vaccine, which of course he did.
And this is the man who in, I think it was January of 2021, called for Tony Blair to be the vaccine czar to get as many people fake vaccinated as possible.
Now he's complaining about it.
And of course, if you want a supporter of Israel, then there's your man, you know.
All these parties like Obama, change, I stand for change, we want change, change you can believe in, they're just the old system repackaged under another identity to con you that they're different when they're not.
They're not.
The reform party is certainly in great need of reform, if it's going to be a reform party, in my view anyway.
In my opinion, it's only there to get Labour in, because it will take a lot of votes off the contenders.
Take a lot of votes from the Tories, yeah.
You've seen this in America, where they've had a third candidate that's got a lot of votes.
It's got the other guy in.
That's what First Past the Post does.
It's a manipulator's dream, First Past the Post politics.
Yeah, it is, and that might happen again.
You never know over there.
We're going to move on to another story, which was a conspiracy theory last week.
Cloud seeding and weather manipulation, but...
This is from Sky News, and they're actually talking about how, they're actually explaining to you what cloud seeding is, like it's something that has always been accepted and everyone's always known about.
They describe it as the practice of weather modification, where small planes fly through clouds, burning salt flares, and that can increase precipitation, help make it rain.
So that's obviously what's happened in Dubai, which is total carnage.
The videos that we're going to throw up are incredible, of the airport and of the streets.
But what's interesting is how this was a conspiracy theory, and they've not come out and said, oh, this is happening, by the way.
They've said it like everyone should have already known that.
It's incredible.
You know, I said some time ago now that I'm watching my books from way back being reported on the television news.
And it's happening all the time now.
I mean, I'm I'm shaking my head, you know.
God, that was in my books 20 years ago, mate.
25 years ago.
And now you're telling me it's breaking news, you know.
And this weather manipulation is a classic.
So we've had this, and it is funny, really, on one level, how they try to They have to admit something, because it's obvious.
Like, you put cloud technology in action, and rains followed immediately.
That created the unbelievable scenes in Dubai.
So, you know, we can't say they're not cloud-seeding because they're obviously cloud-seeding.
So what do we do?
And what I'm seeing, there's an article in New Scientist, of course we're scientists, we follow the science, but other reports as well.
No, it weren't cloud-seeding, it's climate change, you know.
So, you mean they've been cloud-seeding and then calling it climate change?
Oh no, no, no!
It is climate change, that's what's causing it.
Oh yeah, of course it is.
And what you find is this extraordinary, and we're going to see some examples of it, this extraordinary correlation between cloud seeding and immediately following levels of brain that are unprecedented, certainly in living memory.
So in Dubai, they had in one day, 18 months of rainfall after seeding the clouds.
And here's a report on the United Arab Emirates cloud seeding technology.
Just so I know, I have to drive back from Abu Dhabi to Dubai.
No.
It's not raining.
It's a sunny day.
The UAE government invested more than $20 million in research to start a process called cloud seeding.
The UAE performs around 1,000 hours of cloud seeding a year, and it's all controlled by this building in the National Center of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi, where they track the whole process.
We met with a cloud seeding expert to explain how the seeding process works.
We wait for the forecast when we have a good chance for a cloud.
We send the aircraft to that location.
It goes under the cloud.
In the first stage of the cloud, there is a good updraft at that time.
Start to release all the salt.
And with the good updraft, of course, it will go inside the cloud.
The droplets will become bigger and start to rain.
The center manufactures a salt substance that helps enhance rainfall.
They put them in what they call flares.
So, they seed the clouds to create rain, and you get the massive catastrophe that followed in Dubai, and we're told that the two don't, it's not a cause and effect.
So let's look at some others.
First of all, as I've said in the books over the years, they have been manipulating the weather at least, at least, Since the Second World War, and there's a document that I've US military document are featured in the books many times, which was an is predicting that the US military, never mind everyone else.
Well, they're obviously ahead of the game.
and it's very instructive in the light of current events to remember 1952, the
year that I was born and you know I'm getting on a bit now.
And it happened in a little town called Linmouth in England.
And there was this enormous flood.
I think they had 250 times the rainfall in, again, 24 hours.
Yeah, it's a gorge, isn't it?
Yeah.
So the water came rushing.
The water came down the gorge after this extraordinary level of rain.
And it basically washed the town away.
We're going to see an archive report of that in a second.
But the point is that Then in 2001, because it was like, oh, it's an active god.
Right, OK.
So in 2001, the BBC, of all people, did a radio documentary talking to some of the people who were involved.
And they revealed that the RAF, the Royal Air Force, was flying through clouds in that area at the time And, um...
Seeding them with rain-creating chemicals.
Wasn't it the smell of sulphur?
Oh yeah, sulphur was part of it, and, you know, people in Linmouth were saying afterwards that there was this smell of sulphur in the air before it happened.
And then the rain came, this phenomenal rain, and it washed the town away.
here's a report so people who weren't around at the time will see what happened.
yesterday Linmouth was a peaceful holiday resort yesterday Linmouth was a peaceful holiday resort
Today, it is a ruin.
Pathy cameraman Bill Jordan was on the spot soon after floods had swept down from the hills to smash the little town.
And this is his story.
I knew very little about Linmouth before I arrived.
When I looked around, I was almost glad I didn't.
Friends had sent me picture postcards of Watersmeet, a beauty spot only a few miles away.
It looked very pretty and quiet.
It was this stream, swollen with rain, that became a raging torrent, and it was these boulders that were swept down to Linmouth to destroy shops, hotels and homes.
In one single night, the main street had become a wild, churning river.
It was dark red from the Devon soil.
When I was there, nobody could tell for certain how many had been killed.
We knew it was at least 22.
I talked to some of the people who had lost their homes and their friends.
They were still bewildered, still unable to grasp that their little town, which some of the locals used to call Honeymoon Town, was now just rubble.
They told me of the awful speed with which the flood struck, and of the dreadful sound of the water roaring and smashing
its way through their homes.
Already work has begun to mend the battered town.
The army is there, and with them the men of the St.
John's Ambulance and the women of the WVS, just as they were during the blitzes.
Help has been generously given.
Nearby villagers have opened their homes to give shelter to the homeless.
Broken furniture littered the streets.
As I stepped over the rubble to leave Linmouth, a great dark cloud hung over the little town.
Slowly, rain began to fall again.
So, I mean, that report just shows this is nothing new.
you.
This is something that's 40 years, 50, 60, 70 years ago.
Yeah, and what they've been doing as they've developed their technology is getting more and more able to impact upon the weather.
And if you look at Bernard Eastland, who wrote many of the patents for the HAARP technology, the HAARP technology in Alaska, and they're called ionosphere heaters, and there's many of them around the world now.
And what they do is they fire radio waves at the ionosphere in the upper atmosphere.
It makes the ionosphere vibrate and the waves come back very much more powerful than they went up.
And this can be used to manipulate the weather and it can be used to manipulate even earthquakes.
And Bernard Eastland said that HAARP can manipulate can move the jet stream. And the jet stream is
the basic weather system coming into Europe from the United States. If you mess with that,
you're going to change the weather, right? And so this technology has been getting more and
more advanced, to the point now, if they get a hurricane building, they can increase its
power and they can direct it to where it wouldn't normally go.
All these things become possible.
And what they then do, of course, is say, it's climate change.
This is just evidence of climate change.
And if people would just look at what the climate changes were predicting, and the period That they were predicting it would happen.
It was vastly, vastly longer into the future than they're now claiming is happening now.
Yeah.
So suddenly, what they were saying, well, by this year, this will be happening, now they're saying it's happening now.
And they can make that appear to happen, appear to happen through weather manipulation.
I mean, what is weather?
It is energy.
On one level, it's an electromagnetic field.
And they're putting up all these satellites around the Earth, and these low-orbit satellites.
Thank you, Mr. Musk.
That are creating this electromagnetic cloud and they can't manipulate other electromagnetic fields within the same arena.
It's ridiculous.
And just to emphasize the point further of this cloud seeding and then immediately the rains come common theme through the decades now.
This is a report on television in Australia from Tasmania in 2016 and they had phenomenal rainfall following an admitted cloud seeding operation immediately before.
Here's just more confirmation of the thing.
Residents in southern Tasmania are demanding to know why cloud seeding was conducted over the Derwent River catchment the day before the worst floods in 40 years.
Cloud seeding is a technique used to increase rain.
Hydro Tasmania has confirmed it flew a cloud seeding flight despite the weather warnings.
Farmers believe the technique could have made the flooding worse.
The Premier says a formal inquiry will be held into the effects and handling of the floods if it's necessary.
So it looks like the conspiracy theorists were right again then.
Yeah, they've been doing this for a very long time, but if you'd have spoke about this a couple of weeks ago, you'd have been called a conspiracy theorist and said, damn it, they can't do that.
Yeah, but they're even still calling you a conspiracy theorist because they're saying it's climate change and not cloud seeding, even though it's bloody obviously cloud seeding.
But again, you know, from what we were talking about with this Criticism of Israel becoming much more acceptable and open now, because what they're doing is, the Israeli government is doing, is more and more blatantly really obvious.
It's the same with the climate change thing.
You know, people are starting to see, in much, much greater numbers, the scale of the scam that's going on.
And it is a most blatant one.
If you want to justify this cult agenda of human control and the end of movement and the end of the industrial era, which produces carbon dioxide, Then you make carbon dioxide the demon and say we must reduce the demon and to reduce the demon we must have you under this fierce control system.
Run by AI and 15-minute cities and stuff.
Then all you need to do is to get people in enough numbers to believe in the climate change hoax.
But they're losing ground on that.
They are losing ground on that, as they're losing ground in many areas in terms of public perception of what's going on.
And this situation with the cloud seeding in Dubai, which has kind of brought the thing to the surface, It's making a lot more people go, hold on a minute, what do you mean they can manipulate the weather?
You know, you talk to people and you say, you know they can manipulate the weather.
Oh, they can't manipulate the weather.
Well, of course they've been doing it since at least the Second World War.
But this has made it clear that they can.
Yeah, and the fact that it's even in the mainstream media as well.
Here's a positive sign.
Yeah, absolutely.
Because even people that think it's a conspiracy theory that see Sky covering it will be like, oh, maybe there's something in this then.
But I mean, does it feel almost like, you could tie it into the Third World War thing as well, that like, we've got the cornered rat and they're chucking everything they can.
So the fact that more people are waking up to the fact climate change is a scam, the fact that more people are waking up to what Israel are doing, do you think there are ways to try and get people to Yeah, and Disease X and all this stuff.
Yeah, they will.
So we might see more extreme weather, they're blaming on that.
We might see more conflict, they're blaming on that.
Yeah, and disease X and all this stuff.
Yeah, they will.
I've said over the years that they're going to throw the kitchen sink, the bath, the door,
the front door, the roof, they're going to throw everything at us to batter us into perceptual
and thus behavior submission.
And we mustn't fall for it.
We mustn't.
We absolutely mustn't.
And one of the major things that is unfolding, far more major than Even a lot of people realize, who think they're informed, is the scale of censorship that they are planning to bring in.
Because if you want to control perception, you have to control the information that people form their perceptions from.
And if there's these people that are telling you the government's lying to you and putting the evidence forward to prove it, and your life experience is telling you that anyway, then that's a real problem.
So the only thing you can do to respond to that is to censor any alternative information.
And what I found interesting, and it kind of is connected, You've had this situation with X and Elon Musk and Brazil.
And I've been saying over the years, since Musk acquired Twitter, that he has a getaway car, a getaway car that was perfectly predictable from the start.
Which would maintain his image as Mr. Freedom by the mainstream alternative media, but allow him to censor.
And that is government legislation.
So, when the Brazilian government told him to take down accounts, they took them down.
That was the immediate reaction.
But then they said, no, we're going to put them back.
Because what you're doing, what you're asking us to do is against Brazilian law.
And we can't break the law by doing what you do, what you're telling us to do, because it's not legal.
So I got a few musk posts to that.
to that end.
I just posed a question.
I didn't expect an answer, of course, but I just posed the question.
So yeah, I get that.
But if legislation was passed by tyrants, but was in that country legal, not lawful, legal, would you then Take down what they told you to take down.
And I found a story, a report of a study from 2023 And it's a, it was a study of data in a kind of a database where your Twitter exes and your Googles and your Facebooks, they volunteer the information of what they've taken down.
And it turns out that since Elon Musk acquired Twitter, they have taken down more accounts from diktats from government and authorities than before he acquired it.
So what we're looking at, and I saw some other stories this morning about that, what we're looking at is a scenario In which they say, well, look, we got no choice because they're going to find us and we can't even afford all the fines and all that stuff.
And so we're going to have to take I don't want to take it down.
I think it's terrible.
I think it's tyranny.
But we're going to have to take it down.
And so you have the ability.
To censor while at the same time the mainstream alternative media says, well, he don't want to censor, he don't want to, he's one of us, you know that.
And that's the getaway car that I could see coming a long way back, which now is kind of unfolding.
Now he'll keep pushing back because he's got an image to protect.
But I'm going to be very interested to see what is actually taken down against Well, he has claimed for freedom of speech.
Because if you really care about it, what you do is you take him on.
Yeah, and he's supposedly got the money to fight him in court.
Yeah.
You take him on because, you know, there's one recently where, in the last couple of days, he's taken it down and said we're going to appeal.
But they've taken it down.
That's the point.
Okay, don't take it down an appeal.
Yeah.
Because once you go down that road, it means that any laws that are passed in a country dictate whether you take something down off your platform or not.
And, you know, don't tell me that countries are not democracies, that they are run by networks, not by the people.
And then...
Respond to the network's changing the law to suit the agenda of the network, and tell me you stand up for freedom of speech.
It doesn't make sense.
No, it doesn't.
And the final two stories we're going to touch on are to do with censorship, to do with freedom of speech, and that's one from New Zealand with the lawyer Liz Gunn, and one from Holland, which is about what happens when the system decides you've said too much or you can't say that.
They've actually tried to put people in prison.
There's discussions about putting people in prison.
Yeah, this is happening around the world.
This is absolutely a red flag for exactly what I've just been talking about.
The situations are quite similar, because what's happened is that apparently in the Netherlands, which is a completely fascist government, a completely fascist government, plus the royal family, that always send attendees to the Bilderberg Group, going way back, someone has hacked into government databases.
And found that the public, I mean, you'll be staggered to hear this, ladies and gentlemen, have been lied to about the impact of death and health on the population of the COVID fake vaccine.
And the story in New Zealand is very, very similar.
There was a guy called Barry Young, Who is an IT guy, worked for the government and he, shall we say, accessed data in the Health New Zealand operation website and databases.
Which show that the New Zealand government, you'll be staggered again, has been lying to the New Zealand public about the scale of death and health destruction of the Covid fake vaccines.
And what they've done now, apparently, is to threaten jail time And a massive fine for those people who have posted the Barry Young material and will not take it down.
So one of them is an activist called Liz Gunn.
She's been on Iconic.
She has been.
And this is a video that she posted about a lawyer's letter that she's just received this week.
Today, I have had a letter from a lawyer who is threatening very clearly that By next Monday, but I believe it could be by tomorrow midday.
Today is Wednesday.
By tomorrow midday.
The police could invade this space and take all my equipment that I could be up for three months imprisonment and a $40,000 fine, according to this letter.
And I'm going to take you through it because I want you to understand what it's like.
I want you to be with me on this journey.
I am just the canary in the coal mine.
I'm the one telling you what's coming, New Zealand.
It's a form of communism.
It's the oppression that we laughed at or pitied over in China or Stalinist Russia.
It's the things that our forebears stood up for.
That's what I said in my first love letter.
Jacinda Ardern, you are my servant.
I am not yours.
And my father stood in World War II for me and my children and their children to be free.
And you will not get away with it.
Well, they are getting away with it, the globalist puppet politicians.
And that includes this government.
Luxin is very different from Ardern.
He just stays silent and stealthily implements what the globalists want.
The World Economic Forum, look up Agenda 2030.
The United Nations, which is corrupt beyond measure.
And the WHO, the World Health Organization, which is about sickness and oppression of the people and is about to implement a pandemic treaty that will give them the right to take over our sovereign rights in each country around the world and push us, herd us, force us, coerce us, make us take whatever injections they want.
And if New Zealanders continue to look away as you have, my voice won't be here.
Well, New Zealand was as fascist as anyone through COVID.
So it's not a surprise it started there.
And I mean, to be fair, I think she did quite a few things that were quite embarrassing to the Jacinda Ardern government in terms of exposing stuff.
So she put a big target on her back.
Yeah, but you know, this is the thing.
Jacinda Ardern was a blatant global cult front woman.
She was a former aide of Tony Blair.
She was a young leader, wasn't she?
Yeah, World Economic Forum to her DNA.
And she played the game through COVID impeccably from a World Economic Forum perspective, from a World Health Organization perspective as well.
Same thing.
And then, of course, when it started to hit the fan, she was out.
She suddenly resigned and disappeared, right?
But this is the point that the network that produced her and brought her to power is the network that's still there when she's gone.
Therefore, the policy doesn't change.
The, you know, the network that was there under Obama was the network that was there in America under Trump, and it's the network that's there under Biden, and it's the network that will be there under whoever is the next president, because the network is the common theme.
They are just come and go people.
And so you have the Netherlands, which you know, I know a lot about because of being banned from that.
And God knows what 29 other 28 other European countries as a result.
And that network Even though it's classic, obvious frontman, all these recent years, been a guy called Mark Rutter, the Prime Minister.
Again, like Netanyahu, he's been Prime Minister of the Netherlands over and over again.
And always seems to come back, because he's got the network with him.
That's why.
He does what the network tells him, so he keeps being Prime Minister.
It's cause and effect.
So, he's now talking about he's going to step down, and they're talking about him being Secretary General of NATO, right?
Well, he's the obvious choice, because like Stellenberg, he'll do whatever you tell him, right?
And then you've got the Dutch Royal Family, which, like I said earlier, is big-time coal-owned.
And the network still runs the Netherlands, and it will run the Netherlands after Rutte's gone.
And it's the network that is behind all this, and it's quite happy, you know, to hang a few of its front people out to dry every now and again.
Yep.
As long as people don't look behind them and instead of saying, it's our turn.
Yes, it is.
But who is the power behind Ardern?
That's where the real power lies.
And so, even though she's gone, New Zealand goes on doing the same thing.
Well, she's gone and they've replaced her with their number two, who was next to her the whole time she was doing what she was doing, which they didn't like.
It's just, it's laughable.
Absolutely.
Every time I see him, I think, does your mother know you're out this way?
Yeah, I know.
Yeah.
Like a little boy.
Yeah, he is.
Hello, Mr. Culp, what should I do now?
Well, you jail them, right?
If you don't take this stuff down.
Yes, sir.
That's the dynamic.
That's what happens.
It's how it goes on.
This is why, you know, you've got weak people like Sunak.
Yeah.
They're trying to say that, you know, if this happened in North Korea or happened in Iran, they were trying to jail somebody that was exposing government secrets.
They would be up in outcry in the Western media about democracy and about freedom of speech and about freedom of the press.
But do it in New Zealand.
I've not heard this story in the British press.
I've not heard the story about Holland in the British press.
I've only heard it because we look at alternative sources.
So it's just... What's the word?
The double standards are incredible.
Yeah, but again... We live in a me-me-me society.
Not everybody, of course not everybody.
But overwhelmingly, the system is based on me-me-me.
So politicians make decisions based on what's best for me, me, me.
Is it best for me, me, me to take on this force I know has the power to destroy me if I don't do what it says?
Like, you know, you're Netanyahu's and all these people, not that he needs much bloody encouragement.
And then you've got people like in journalism saying, well, if I push back on the system, What would that do to my career?
Me, me, me.
And, you know, if we're going to sort this out, me, me, me has to become we, we, we.
Where we say, what's the right thing to do?
Not what's good for me in the moment.
What's the right just thing to do and do it.
And eventually, you'll see that that actually benefits you.
Not least, you can sleep at night.
Mind you, you probably can anyway.
But it's this me, me, me.
What's the consequences for me of doing the right thing?
Oh, I'd like to do the right thing, but not that badly, thank you.
And say, look, no matter what the consequences, they'll take care of themselves.
I'm going to do what I know to be right.
That's what will bring it down.
Because the opposite is what's allowed it to prevail.
Yeah, absolutely.
Unity is the only way forward.
Mimimi is just going to keep ending up in this mess and keep allowing divide and rule.
All it's going to do.
Mimimi says, I know that's unjust, but If I do anything about it, it's bad for me.
So what happens?
The injustice continues or gets worse.
And me, me, me is how the cult operates.
That's the whole foundation.
Even its intimidation of politicians and intimidation of people in positions of power is me, me, me at work.
Because the people in those positions of power are saying, If I take this colt on, what are the consequences for me, me, me?
Oh, I'm not going to then.
This is how it works.
Yeah, I agree.
On another scale, you could look at it like when you watch the videos of like the Sydney attack the other day and some videos from trains in London the last few weeks when people have been running around with knives.
No one's sat there.
No one does anything.
Whereas the idea for me of walking away or even running away while someone's attacking somebody else, it doesn't even compute.
But it's that me-me-me self-preservation, as long as I'm alright.
I can't compute that.
Especially when, like the ones in the train, when someone's got a knife and you're like, you can't hurt 20 people at once.
Just 10 of you run at him, or something.
You know?
And you defuse the situation.
This is an interesting point.
I've written about this a lot over the years.
The reptilian brain, this part of the brain here.
Yeah, it's fight or flight, isn't it?
Yeah, it's fight or flight, and it's about self-preservation.
It's about not just self-preservation physically, but self-preservation of your job, your relationship, your career, right?
And that brings us round to Me, Me, Me.
The survival mechanism, which is in this reptilian brain, it's that mechanism that road rage comes from.
Because it doesn't think, it just reacts.
And you know when people just react and do something really over the top?
And then, as they calm down, their brain kicks in and it goes, What was I doing?
Well, oh, that's the classic.
What was I thinking?
You weren't.
You were reacting.
And that's the reptilian brain.
I don't think that's in there by accident either, by the way.
And so if you are dominated by that reptilian brain survival response, Which fight or flight is very much part of.
And there are situations where it works.
But if you're dominated by it, then me, me, me is going to be the first reaction.
What's the consequences for me?
Okay, this person's being attacked.
Well, if I get involved, what happens to me?
Whereas people who are not dominated by the reptilian brain, Not dominated by the me me me that comes from it.
They will say it's what's happening is not right.
I'm going to get involved and it's a completely different way of responding and.
Yeah, the reptilian brain is a massive manipulator of human reaction and human behaviour.
Yeah, you do the opposite of what it tells you to do, and you're usually far wrong.
Right, thanks, Dad.
This is going to be the format from now on, isn't it?
Studio.
Yeah, we're going to do a lot more in Derby, that's for sure.
Yeah, sorry you've had to move here, but... Well, I've not moved here, but I'm going to spend a lot more time here, that's for sure.
Well, thank you.
Nice one for watching, everybody.
Thank you for joining us.
We'll be back with you again next Friday.
Until then, take care.
Bye.
Bye.
There's a lot of things that I've said over the years, which were perceived to be crazy.
Bye.
and then suddenly they start to move mainstream.
I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
What is real?
How do you define real?
If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
▲
Export Selection