| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Defending Against Simulated Realities
00:11:39
|
|
| There's a lot of things that I've said over the years, which were perceived to be crazy. | |
| and then suddenly they start to move mainstream. | |
| I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation. | |
| What is real? | |
| How do you define real? | |
| If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. | |
| What if all you ever knew was a lie? | |
| What if all you ever knew was a lie? | |
| David Icke. | |
| I have... | |
| I have, uh, episode 521, I almost completely forgot about David Icke. | |
| That's an episode called Iconic Stupidity. | |
| And that went, uh, that was a broadcast on the occasion of the fact that he was going to speak at the Dam. | |
| On Museumplein, I don't know, but it was a freedom demonstration. | |
| He was invited, he would talk for 20 minutes. | |
| And then suddenly everyone was in panic. | |
| Suddenly there was a bombardment in the media that it is an anti-Semitic and it is a dangerous wind and I don't know what else. | |
| And he had to be banished, he had to be denied access. | |
| To the Netherlands. | |
| And they actually succeeded. | |
| They have the triangle. | |
| Like Femke Halsema always says, the mayor of Amsterdam. | |
| The triangle has decided that we do it this way. | |
| There can be no discussion about that. | |
| So that was such an incredible excuse for the KUG back then. | |
| But it was so incredible. | |
| I was so angry about it. | |
| For several reasons. | |
| First of all, I hate censorship. | |
| By being a bung for. | |
| Well, probably because he speaks the truth. | |
| And they don't want people to hear that. | |
| They want to keep people stupid. | |
| But I HATE censorship. | |
| I HATE censorship. | |
| The second is that this man has no criminal record. | |
| He has never been convicted of anything. | |
| And the biggest allegation that comes up is that it could cause unrest. | |
| Yes, but there is no evidence that this man ever created it and that this man ever He's been to blame that riots broke out or something. | |
| It never happened. | |
| This is a man who has been doing research for 30, 40 years on how the world really works. | |
| Where the real power is, where the real power is. | |
| This man has written books, they are so thick. | |
| It is substantiated, it is research, it is not just made up. | |
| Look, the man is intelligent and the man also has a spiritual consciousness. | |
| I see that clearly and that's a nice combination. | |
| But it's all based on facts and research. | |
| Conversations with so many people. | |
| So he can defend himself against the attack. | |
| But the biggest attack that comes is that he made anti-Semitic statements. | |
| Well, I did research on him. | |
| I wasn't the only one. | |
| We didn't find anything. | |
| And the worst part is, it's just stuck in an accusation. | |
| It's an accusation of, yes, he's an anti-Semite. | |
| But there has never been evidence. | |
| So first of all, this is an innocent man who comes to Twiddlewood to speak at a freedom demonstration. | |
| Freedom of expression, all important. | |
| You can agree with someone or disagree, but everyone has the right to express their opinion in the Netherlands. | |
| The so-called democratic Netherlands. | |
| But if you come with an accusation, then you have to be able to substantiate it. | |
| But what happens? | |
| This man is banished from the Netherlands and from all other Schengen countries. | |
| At the same time, because we are in a cozy EU, they can do that with one push of a button. | |
| That was also interesting to see. | |
| But it is so unfair because there is no evidence of what he has done wrong. | |
| Then it goes to the courtroom in the Netherlands. | |
| And in the first instance it is said, yes, the triangle was allowed to do this. | |
| But what it's all about, of course, is proof of what he actually said and where that danger is. | |
| And not just a claim from a group or whatever, that doesn't matter at all. | |
| Because everyone can do that. | |
| Then you can blame everyone for something, without evidence, and especially in terms of content. | |
| There must be a point, somewhere there must be a point where you can defend yourself in terms of content against such a huge threat. | |
| Especially if there are consequences, that you can no longer travel in 26 Schengen countries. | |
| So the man is almost locked up there in England at the moment, in Great Britain. | |
| But that's so intense what you do to a human being. | |
| He also seems to have a family of his own in the Netherlands. | |
| But it's so intense. | |
| Then there must be a point. | |
| And this is just honest. | |
| This is just the way it should be. | |
| And this is the democracy and the free Netherlands that everyone is talking about. | |
| There must be a point where it is actually tested where you are accused of and that you can defend yourself. | |
| And there must also be evidence of what is so bad about what he said and someone must be able to defend themselves. | |
| Well, in the first instance that didn't work. | |
| And then there was a higher appeal and there was still hope that it would now be justified. | |
| But no, yesterday was just the statement, it just stays that way. | |
| Without this man being able to defend himself and without them coming with evidence. | |
| It's a huge accusation. | |
| Anti-Semitism, especially in the West. | |
| It's been like that for so long, if you're accused of it. | |
| Then there must be a point where you can defend yourself. | |
| And they just take it away from him. | |
| So what's scary about this and what's dangerous about it, it's beyond danger now. | |
| You can just accuse people and then you can take their whole life. | |
| And then there are judges and they don't ask for evidence. | |
| They're probably afraid of a bailiff. | |
| I don't know. | |
| But that's the feeling you get, of course. | |
| And of course I'm not the only one in the Netherlands. | |
| But even though I wouldn't agree with David Icke at all, I still think he has the right to speak. | |
| And certainly. | |
| I can't accuse him if I... I mean, let's bring in Femke Halsema. | |
| Yes, I don't have to talk to that witch anymore, with that locked up bit. | |
| But I'm not going to file a complaint, like, you know what she says? | |
| I think it's offensive. | |
| Yes, and that the Triangle has decided that I can't, Femke Halsema, I'm not allowed to say anything in public, because there has been a complaint. | |
| I'm going to try to defend myself. | |
| And then Femke Halsema is not allowed to defend herself. | |
| And then I'm not asked to come up with evidence. | |
| This is exactly what's going on here, and you have to imagine how far it goes. | |
| There's a pressure on the button, somewhere, and you're just confused. | |
| We have 26 countries. | |
| And David Icke is someone... The advantage of this is that many more people in the Netherlands are going to investigate what this man has investigated in his life. | |
| He has done research, he has spoken to so many people, he has made his life out of it. | |
| And he knows exactly where the bad places are. | |
| And he knows exactly what the truth is. | |
| And they don't want him to tell the truth. | |
| That's the only conclusion. | |
| Because otherwise he could have defended himself. | |
| And if they hadn't been afraid, he could have spoken. | |
| And David Icke, you don't hear much about him. | |
| But listen, there was no Russell Brand without David Icke. | |
| There was no... I'm sure Joe Rogan follows Icke. | |
| And they talk very little about that because he's too controversial. | |
| But he's just investigating this. | |
| And it's not someone who's just making things up. | |
| Again, he writes such books. | |
| He can substantiate it. | |
| He can explain exactly what he means. | |
| But you can't just throw someone away because there's a claim. | |
| And you can't ban someone from 26 countries! | |
| And the people... I know the Jensen Show is widely watched by a lot of people. | |
| And I'm sure there are a number of people watching who have had to deal with this. | |
| Shame on you! | |
| I mean, I don't have children. | |
| But what kind of future is this? | |
| You can throw everything at everyone, but when you press the button, you're just gone. | |
| And you can't get anywhere. | |
| And you don't have to substantiate it. | |
| Because it gives a small group of people a good feeling that the man has his mouth shut. | |
| But there has to be a point. | |
| There has to be a point in the legal language. | |
| There has to be a point where it's fair. | |
| And this is not fair! | |
| In fact, this is... | |
| Again, we're beyond danger, we're beyond danger. | |
| And the people who just walk by and think, I still have a job to do, or I still have this to do. | |
| Think about this! | |
| I still have this. Do this! What is this? It's really terrible. | |
| And hopefully there will be a point where the whole story can be heard. | |
| And that's getting more and more difficult. | |
| And that's something we should all be against, of course. | |
| But of course the mainstream media doesn't talk about it. | |
| You don't hear much about it. | |
| And everyone thinks, well, he must have said something. | |
| And it's sad and it's very annoying for David, I think, and his family and everything. | |
| But we don't give up. | |
| We always just go on. | |
| But I do have to be seen clearly that if there is no longer a point where you can defend yourself against a threat, but that a big decision is made about it, then it starts there. | |
| But soon it will be with us all. | |
| Look, even Borsato, he has to be able to defend himself. | |
| Of course today it's all in the news, Borsato becomes OM. | |
| Okay, but at least there will be a point when he can defend himself with his lawyer. | |
| It should always be like this and you should be able to defend it in-depth. | |
| And an honest statement should be made about it, whether there is indeed enough evidence and whether it is | |
| all justified and it should be honest. | |
| And it can't just be that you have a very vague area with vague numbers. | |
| It is so... | |
| It is so... | |
| ...disgusting what is going on. | |
| There's a lot of things that I've said over the years, which were perceived to be crazy. | |
| And then suddenly, they start to move mainstream. | |
| Scream, scream, scream! | |
| I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation. | |
|
Real Is Signal
00:00:24
|
|
| What is real? | |
| How do you define real? | |
| If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. | |