Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 21, 2023 - David Icke

22:18

Who Is The Online Safety Bill Really Protecting? - David Icke Talks To Gareth Icke Tonight

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, 2023 continues to keep us all on our toes.
	What's coming next?
	We've already out-tribbled up Mexican aliens and literally no one cared.
	2023, innit?
	The masses shrugged.
	Every day is one big family-sized game of George W. Bonker's bingo.
	Dirty Knee, 33.
	See?
	Told you he was a mason.
	The online safety bill has passed in the UK and will soon become law.
	The bill will partner the UK with Syria, Qatar, China, North Korea and 1960s East Germany in the same Ministry of Truth, Fascism, World Cup group.
	No longer can messages be encrypted.
	Heaven forbid a private citizen has a private conversation, or even a private thought.
	If you've got something to say, you say it to the Stasi.
	And not only can the state read your private messages, but they can prosecute you for them as well.
	This is what our forefathers ran up the Normandy beaches under the barrage of machine gun fire for.
	There will be some that will take the bore-lakingly naive view that if you aren't saying anything illegal, then, well, you've got nothing to worry about.
	Saying anything illegal.
	Can you hear yourself?
	You'd love Stalin.
	Of course, it's sold as a much-needed weapon in the arsenal to fight child grooming and to keep people safe online, because the government's always cared about protecting children and keeping them safe, haven't they?
	30% of kids in the UK live in poverty.
	And what happened to the hundreds of documents detailing the elite paedophile networks within the corridors of Westminster during the 80s and 90s?
	Oh yeah, they lost them.
	They lost him in the shredder.
	It's careless.
	The real reason for the online safety bill is to silence dissenting voices, destroy the genuine alternative media, and protect the official narrative on everything.
	Say something the state doesn't like, and you get your collar felt.
	The only people being kept from harm with this safety bill are the elite WEF fluffers and compromised sellouts pushing the cult's twisted will on an often unsuspecting population.
	Now, I mean, I like the film, The Lives of Others, Hopefully enough people will stand up and fight back against this draconian invasion of privacy and free speech deletion to knock it back into the demented mind in which it was spawned.
	But I won't hold my breath.
	This week, in yet another example of insanity, it seems that those with Neanderthal genes, extra baggy, are more likely to develop a severe illness from Covid.
	That's according to Italian scientists.
	Presumably that's because the Neanderthals Are the only ones still testing for this nonsense?
	And speaking of nonsense, we've now reached a point as a society that the answer to whether an individual is guilty of a crime as severe as sexual assault or not is dependent on whether or not that person's political views align with your own.
	The court of public opinion is a crazy, crazy place.
	Hey, did you hear?
	Phil, down the road, he's been accused of attacking a woman in the park.
	Was he vaccinated?
	I don't know, actually.
	I don't think so.
	Well, he's guilty, then.
	Doesn't care about other people, does he?
	Well, yeah, that's true.
	He does donate to climate action charities, though.
	Well, he might be innocent, then.
	I need a tiebreaker.
	Was he wearing a mask?
	Well, yeah, he was wearing a mask, but there you go, then.
	He's innocent, isn't he?
	Yeah, what I was going to say, though, is that he was only wearing a mask to kind of, you know, try and hide his identity from the victim.
	Oh, man.
	Well, I don't know what to think now.
	How do I make a snap judgment on whether he's guilty or not?
	I don't know.
	Maybe don't?
	That's just a thought. In other bingo related news, you can now rob a shop owner, then repeatedly
	batter him with a metal shopping basket until he retaliates and still be the victim. It's a result,
	isn't it? The incident in Peckham, South London has created a situation that borders on a localised
	race war. And of course, the virtue signalling white saviour complex influence social media types
	were all happy to stoke the flames by sharing a single clip of an Asian shop owner finally
	retaliating against a black lady while obviously omitting any of the lead up. This is a man with
	his hands around the throat of an innocent woman of colour.
	Oh, so you know what woman is now then, Anyone seeing that image without the background story would have been understandably incensed.
	And that's what these accounts are all about.
	Stir up division for clicks, likes and followers.
	It's also a clever way of deflecting from themselves.
	Are you a privately educated wealthy?
	Are you in a position of power, in a position of strength in this world, but you still want to be able to whinge and moan about equality without people calling out your own hypocrisy?
	Well, you call yourself an ally then, don't you?
	It works every single time.
	The reality, away from the hashtags, is the shop owner has had to abandon his business, leave the area, take his kids out of school, and has received multiple death threats.
	The online safety bill won't be interested in creating protections in situations like this, though, because, you know, Division's good for business.
	Keep the plebs scrapping over skin colour, religion, sexuality, political leanings, while you rule over all of them.
	It's one ring to rule them all.
	And finally, the apparently skint and underfunded Golden Calf, get your Thursday night pots and pans at the ready.
	NHS are spending millions on woke equality and inclusion staff, which is great news.
	Because next time the hospital's short of beds and I get told to sit in the corridor, I can simply take a walk to the staff room, yoink myself, an equality and inclusion officer, to lay on.
	I would say we've become a banana republic, but at least you can peel a banana and it contains something of value.
	Staying with the theme of the online safety bill, what better person to talk to about censorship and freedom of speech than someone who's been booted off multiple media platforms and is banned from Europe, Australia, and if we're honest, multiple other nations should he attempt to travel to them.
	My dad David Ark joins us now from the Isle of Wight.
	Dad, you've been warning about the online safety bill, or the online harms bill as it was previously called, for some time.
	What does this bill mean for the people of the UK?
	Well, not just the UK gas.
	Of course, it has implications for the wider world in terms of its impact on the so-called big tech companies in Silicon Valley.
	But I think what we've got to do is realize that this global cult web that I talk about, it taps into all these apparently unconnected organizations.
	So, you have Silicon Valley Corporations, which are cult corporations, your Facebooks, your Googles, your YouTubes, etc.
	And then you have the British Government and the British Parliament, which is a cult-owned operation in terms of what it does.
	And you've got Ofcom that's going to impose the laws of this online safety bill, which was created by Tony Blair, so that's how bad it is, and it's now coming into what it was always created to do, to be a complete dictator to the broadcast and now internet media.
	But if you get to the level of the web, well that which is imposing the bill attaches to the web.
	Silicon Valley, which is affected by the bill, attaches to the web.
	So at that web level they're on the same side and they're pushing in the same direction towards this global dystopia.
	So when we see this bill Pushed and justified by, we've got to bring the tech companies to heel, we've got to get them to take down this content, take down that content, take down hate content, what's that?
	Anything we say it is.
	And over the other side of the world, in Silicon Valley, you've got, it's a bit much, this thing, and we push it back on in.
	Please.
	This part of the web, the cult, the British government, is providing the excuse – nothing to do with us, it's British government law – for Silicon Valley to do what its masters want to do anyway, which is increasingly hysterically censor anything they don't want the public to hear.
	And so, those that are the biggest danger to this cult agenda, they went early.
	I was banned in the spring, April 2020, when I started saying COVID was not what they were telling it is.
	I went from YouTube, I went from Facebook, on and on and on.
	Spotify, they got rid of all my stuff as well.
	But other people still stay on Spotify, which is quite strange.
	And now they're squeezing and squeezing and squeezing what is deemed misinformation and disinformation to the point where they're picking off people that they weren't picking off before.
	And the idea is, I've been saying this since the Well, for decades now.
	The idea is that they create a situation where people will not hear or see anything that
	the authorities, the cult ultimately, don't want them to hear and see.
	And we're going step by step by step towards that.
	And this online safety bill is a really big step.
	It's not the scale of step that they wanted because there's been pushback, but it's massively
	significant to privacy, internet privacy, and to the freedom to give your opinion and
	the ability to circulate information.
	Now, you know, I have a phrase I've been using for a long, long time, the totalitarian tiptoe.
	And that's what we've been seeing, the totalitarian tiptoe, step by step by step.
	And with each step, more censorship, more silencing, more suppression of what people can say, thus what people can Here.
	And although, you know, people are saying, well, phew, the online safety bill's not as bad as it was going to be, because of course they wanted to force tech companies to take down what was lawful and legal, but was, in their minds, harmful.
	Who decides that?
	We do.
	And that's been pushed back on.
	But sitting in the wings is the Labour Party, the British Labour Party, which apparently, I'm staggered to hear it, was created by a guy called Keir Hardie at the turn of the 20th century to represent the interests of working people.
	And now it's headed by another Keir, Keir Starmer, Sir Keir Starmer, who's so Committed to the rights of the people that he got down on one knee and had the sword on from a monarch or Charlie Boy, whoever it was, to become a sir.
	Anyone who's a Sir should not be leading the Labour Party, surely, if its true mission is still there, which of course it isn't.
	And this Labour Party is now fully woke in all these areas, whether it's climate change, whether it's the whole transgender thing, and big time relating to this subject, they are sitting there Waiting to impose a level of censorship that this country has not seen before.
	And part of that, and indeed they're even talking about it, is to make the online safety bill even more draconian than it is in its form that's just passed.
	Well, a lot of the so-called anti-hate groups that have really been pushing for it are all kind of Labour Party-affiliated, so that makes sense.
	I have noticed, Dad, that they are saying the quiet bit out loud a lot more, and that's not just in the UK.
	You know, Ardern, the big...
	She came out with a line this week where she was saying that freedom of speech is a weapon of war and that basically you need censorship to preserve freedom.
	I mean, this is the party talking, isn't it?
	But it feels like it's an act of desperation though, Dad, rather than an act of power.
	It feels like these actions are coming from a group of people that are frightened that actually people are starting to see through stuff now.
	Yeah, well, I've been saying that for a long time, as you know, that censorship is not an expression of power, it's an expression of weakness.
	And to be honest, if all you can put on public display is a complete moron like Ardern, who is, to anyone with a brain cell on active duty, absolutely transparent as a cult gopher.
	That's why she did what she did in New Zealand during COVID.
	It's a sign of weakness because, you know, you and me, ICONiC, we don't want to censor anyone.
	We want to see the free flow of information, which is very important, because if you talk about freedom of speech, then that's the freedom to speak.
	It's not the freedom to say and speak what is acceptable within parameters set by someone else.
	That's not freedom of speech.
	That's freedom to speak within the parameters set by someone else.
	It's tyranny.
	And, you know, we learn from each other.
	There is no one, there's some a lot less than others, but there's no one that has nothing whatsoever to say that's valid.
	No one.
	No one who has the inability to say anything that someone else might go, Oh, that's interesting.
	I've never thought of that.
	And that's all gone once you start censoring speech.
	So what is this really all about?
	If you're going to control 8 billion people, and there's only at the core a handful of you, Then you can't do that physically.
	You can do it physically in a small area, you can't do it globally.
	What you can do, this is where they're taking it, is to connect the human brain to artificial intelligence and then you can give people their perception direct, no human thought involved.
	That's where they want to go, but at the moment they can't do that quite yet.
	And so how do you control billions of people when there's only a few of you?
	Well, you control their perception.
	You get them to think the way you want them to think, to perceive the way you want them to perceive, whether it's a situation or life in general.
	And then from perception will come behavior.
	We behave as we do because we perceive as we do.
	So just finally then, Dad, what can we do to stand up to this online safety bill?
	Because I've seen, you know, people are already sharing petitions.
	But petitions, for me, they simply ask permission from the very people pushing the bell.
	So that kind of seems somewhat foolish.
	But what do you think we can do to say, no, we're not doing it?
	Well, first of all, people should be looking at other alternative platforms because, you know, the mainstream of the Internet, and I include Elon Musk's operation in that.
	I mean, blimey, what a psy-op-com that is, as will become very clear as we move along.
	To look for alternative ways of communicating with platforms that do have a greater amount of freedom and to keep saying, you know, what we can do is just Censor ourselves.
	Oh, I better not say that because this might happen a minute.
	For me, you know, just say it.
	We need to keep saying it.
	We need to keep speaking our truth and finding different ways of doing it.
	I mean, people are becoming obviously, first of all, very much more cynical and distrustful of the mainstream media.
	And now they're increasingly becoming, well, those with a brain anyway, cynical and distrustful of Of the social media platforms and, you know, it's an opportunity.
	The mother of invention is necessity for other platforms to emerge and of course there'll be every effort to shut them down and suppress them but we just, you know, it's like, you know, in an amusement arcade where you've got those machines where heads keep coming up and you've got a hammer and they're trying to keep their head down.
	A whack-a-mole!
	Yeah, is that what they call whack-a-moles?
	Yeah, well, we've just got to keep doing that.
	When they knock us down here, we come up here.
	We've got to keep it going.
	Because if the authorities get total control, and this is what it's all about, like I've been saying, they get total control of what people hear.
	They'll get total control virtually of what people believe, and they'll get control of how people behave.
	And this is very, very important for young people, because this is the real target, the young.
	I mean, you know, young people, children, They don't give a damn about you.
	They've sold this online safety bill.
	Oh, it's protecting the children.
	You don't give a damn about children.
	You are quite happy for them to be mutilated on the altar of transgender before they have any idea.
	of making a decision that's valid and is based on evidence and letting it go until you're at an age
	where you can make some kind of decision.
	You don't give a damn about kids, it's just the excuse.
	And what they're after is this, they know that people like me, I was what, 71 now,
	born in 1952, I've got a radar that's seen how the world has changed.
	So I see it in a certain light, because this world now is vastly different to what it was when I was growing up.
	But to young people, this is normal.
	This is this is how the world is.
	It's all they've ever known.
	And the idea is that you indoctrinate young people, you control what they see and hear, thus you control their perception.
	And then, more and more, the people who have a radar, because of what it was like before, they start leaving the world.
	Until eventually, you only have left Those who've been completely indoctrinated into this crap from birth.
	And that's another reason for the online safety bill.
	It's not about protecting children.
	They don't give a damn.
	It's about protecting the narrative so it's all the children ever hear.
	Exactly.
	Worst case scenario, Dad, we'll just get a bullhorn each and just take to the streets, mate, if that's what it comes to.
	As always, cheers for joining us, Dad.
	Pleasure, Gaz.
	Take care.
	Bye.
	Bye.
	Now, going back to the subject of the online safety bill, and I guess censorship in general, I do feel like a broken record, but it's freedom of speech for everyone, or there's no such thing as freedom of speech.
	The bill that's being championed, of course, by the narrative-managing so-called anti-hate groups, but I've also seen people on the left side of the political divide cheering it on as well.
	Liberals who aren't liberal are winning the culture war now, so they're more than happy for a law to come in and silence their opponents while they can speak freely.
	But what they don't seem to understand is they can only speak freely because they're saying exactly what the state wants them to say.
	Push Covid jabs, mandates, restrictions.
	Fill your boots.
	Cheer on weapons and taxpayer money to Ukraine.
	Yes, please.
	Climate change, doomsday cult narratives.
	Go for it, mate.
	Promoting gender confusion, chicks with dicks and child mutilation.
	You get tweet and some.
	But the cult can be contradictory.
	Narratives switch and allegiances change to fit the goals of the time.
	It wasn't long ago that the left were being silenced for speaking out against the invasion of Iraq.
	And that flip will come again, where those cheering on the bill now will be the victims of it in the future.
	In the end, they're coming for all of us.
	Energy companies don't check your voting history before switching off your power or sending you an inflated bill.
	Supermarkets don't check your social media timeline before charging you through the roof for food that you could comfortably afford a year ago.
	And the banks won't take your Che Guevara t-shirt into consideration when they're foreclosing on your business.
	We stand together or we fall together.

▲