All Episodes
April 20, 2023 - David Icke
11:28
What does net zero really ,mean for you - Gareth Icke TonightWhat does net zero really ,mean for you - Gareth Icke Tonight
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The entitled narcissistic bath dodgers are back at it.
Yet another just-stop oil man-child clambered for attention this week by disrupting the World Snooker Championship in Sheffield.
The wailing buffoon threw orange powder up in the air to, you know, save the planet.
Notice that none of these people actually do anything to improve the environment.
Climbing on a table on national television and chucking paint at priceless pieces of artwork is far more proactive than, I don't know, Planting trees.
And I know what you're thinking.
If they're after attention, why are you giving it to them?
And you'd be right.
Fair point.
But my issue is the blatant double standards by those that are meant to uphold the law.
While people were protesting peacefully for their freedoms during lockdowns, they were physically attacked by the police on a regular basis.
Now contrast that with the way the law allows these climate mobs to cause havoc, commit acts of criminal damage.
Block roads to major London hospitals without a single truncheon in sight.
These bankrolled scruff bags are doing the cult's bidding.
That's why they're allowed to do it.
Net zero is part of the 1% script, and so this gaggle of crusty pound shop suffragettes are unwittingly playing their part.
The clueless mob are now targeting SUVs for criminal damage.
Well, my SUV identifies as a push bike, so jog on.
No one needs a vehicle that big, they claim, unless of course you've got a disabled child and you need the room to accommodate wheelchairs and other medical equipment.
Do you ever think that?
People might need their vehicle in a moment of emergency to get to casualty, to get to work, to put food in the bellies of their kids.
Course not.
Because those with narcissistic personality disorder only care about their own sense of self-importance.
It's why they're so easy to manipulate.
They're too far up their own backsides, too arrogant to accept the reality that they're being played.
The government's target, the net zero target, which was set as part of the 2019 Climate Change Act, commits us to this net zero by 2050, which means that the total greenhouse gas emissions I've got to be less than the removals by things like planting trees and capturing and removing carbon and stuff like that.
And the point is that what actually has created a lot of interest recently, just just last week, when I raised the point that that realistically, if they do want to achieve that net zero, then there's There's quite a lot of people arguing for the so-called absolute zero, because the problem is that to achieve net zero by 2050, we don't actually have, we'd need to have massive revolutionary new technologies for both removal and capture of the stuff like the greenhouse gases, but also revolutionary new technology for things like electric
Aircraft, stuff like that, if we're going to continue flying.
And there's a UK funded project called the UK Fires Project.
The government funded it for five million pounds.
And what they said was that in order to achieve net zero, you really got to go for absolute zero, which means, for example, that all airports in the UK, other than the three largest Heathrow, Belfast and Glasgow, would need to close by 2030 as a sort of an interim target.
And all flying has to stop completely by 2050.
And then you've got things like no new petrol or diesel cars by 2030.
They say, well, that's actually already being implemented by the government.
They might put it back by two or three years, but already we know that they're not going to allow the development of any new, buying any new petrol or diesel cars.
Then you've got restriction of road traffic.
By 2050, you'd need to have restricted to 60% of today's travel.
Food, energy and heating all reduced to 60% of today's level by 2050.
And beef and lamb to be phased out by 2050.
Now these things sound kind of like ridiculous.
And this is the absolute zero target.
And the government no doubt would argue, well, we might, you know, we're going to have the technology so that we don't have to go to those extremes.
But when you think about it, these are all the messages.
These are the pushes and the nudges that they're going for right now.
Actually, through doing the interviews, through talking about this film, that more than one, you know, at least two, possibly more people who interviewed have told me that before the whole COVID thing, they were taking these, you know, whatever medicines were given to them for whatever reason.
And since then they've stopped.
So we know that there's a division, there's a polarisation, there's people who have woken up very recently to what's happened and people who have not.
What I'm hoping that the film can do, because I think most of us, at least I do, have friends, family, Even loved ones who don't really want to see what the problem is.
And what I'm hoping the film can do, because it doesn't directly deal with Big Pharma, it doesn't directly deal with vaccines or lockdowns or viruses.
What I'm hoping that it can do is that people can watch it together.
So, you know, that person that's not going to listen to you if you mention, you know, that lockdowns didn't work, that vaccines have adverse events, that there's another agenda behind all of it.
Those people who don't listen to you, I still think you could watch this film with them.
And I still think that something will happen.
Not maybe instantly, and that's the power of art.
It sort of works with your subconscious.
But over time, Some questions will be raised in their subconscious and then filtered through their conscious mind.
So I'm hoping that people can use this in the UK and Ireland, where now it's on video on demand, that people can use this film as a tool, really, to sort of plant a seed in the people that they were never able to get through for this awakening that you mentioned.
Okay, so the book is about how Jack Abramoff, first of all, he was set up for criminal prosecution by rival lobbyists within the casino industry.
And then I revealed how he hid the fact that he was set up for criminal prosecution in order to cover up for the Rothschilds and other global players, because he was actually working directly for Jacob Rothschild.
So I reveal how he covered up for them.
He took the fall for them.
And then if you follow his career through the Trump administration, you will see how he then was part of this agenda of moving ahead with the cryptocurrencies, with The attempted maybe Russian takeover or Russian influence upon the Trump administration.
Even the promotion of pot and drugs throughout the United States.
And some of these healthcare issues, including the vaccine and the central bank digital currency.
He was kind of, he and the people around him were driving this agenda into the US.
The kids are sicker.
So whenever I take a case, for example, any of the siblings, they usually have allergies, they have, you know, something else going on, ADHD, but of course, they're much less severe than the child who has the autism diagnosis.
But I just keep seeing over and over and over again, the same thing, or they'll say, oh, I knew that other jab was bad, but I didn't know that this was bad too, because they're different children.
They're to help the children.
They separate the two things.
Yeah.
No, I must admit, I've seen that where people have refused the Covid jab and gone, I'm not having any of that.
And then you see them queuing up for the flu jab the next year and you think, oh, OK, maybe, maybe not then.
But for me, I think with yourself, obviously, like you said, there's thousands of kids now that have been helped and have either fully recovered or have improved standards of living now.
Yes, OK, they're censoring you and they're censoring all of us.
But, you know, that word of mouth gets out there, I think.
You know, where other mothers and fathers will talk and say, you know, your child seems so much better now.
Oh, you know, well, this is what they did.
And, you know, maybe it can snowball a little bit like that, that, you know, that kind of almost an underground thing.
Well, it's always been.
It's always been grassroots.
Everything I've been doing has always been grassroots.
That's why it's been beautiful to see that it's really taken up land in 77 different countries.
I work with families in 77 different countries, or have, at least.
And of course, every time I have somebody who speaks Arabic or Russian or some other language that I don't really have any influence on, I'm like, will you please translate this and then share it into every group that you're in?
And that's really what has happened.
But at the same time, I'd like to be a little bit more optimistic.
So I'll tell you that I'm optimistic, but I'm not really optimistic.
One thing positive I can tell you is that when people do wake up, that they really do go, okay, I'm in.
And they're like, let's go gluten-free casings.
Let's go carnivore.
Let's increase that fat.
Let's, let's, you know, take our, our, our CD.
Let's take our things.
And they do get on board.
And that's exciting.
That's all for this week.
Thank you for tuning in.
And as always, thank you to all of my guests.
Now, what makes a voice iconic?
And I don't mean in a Barry White or a Joe Pasquale way.
I mean, in the sense that that person's voice makes a difference.
It stands out from the crowd and makes at least the immediate world a different place after they've opened their mouth.
Now, I'm sure you have different opinions on this, different definitions of what makes something iconic.
For me, It's someone that speaks the truth without fear of reprisal, without consideration for what impact speaking the truth may have upon themselves.
Next Thursday, I'll be away filming a brand new documentary about the normalisation of obesity and unhealthy living, so instead of Garethite tonight, we'll be airing our first instalment of Iconic Voices.
I took a drive down to Milton Keynes to meet with Whistleblower Funeral Director John O'Looney.
It really was a truly eye-opening conversation.
Good night.
I knew then what they wanted.
What they wanted was the death of a prominent anti-vaxxer from COVID.
We had a young guy in.
He was under 30.
He died suddenly.
And he was literally full of some white gross.
I've never seen it before.
You know, I've got an Obama who's BIE certified, who's done 20 years.
He's never seen it before.
This is why we raised the alarm about it.
We have just seen it, and exclusively in vaccine recipients, and exclusively since they rolled these drugs out, and these people are dying in record numbers.
Export Selection