Feb. 3, 2023 - David Icke
17:49
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Shazam actor Zachary Levi, he's the latest to receive the backlash of the Rona cult. | |
| Levi tweeted his agreement that Pfizer, a multi-billion dollar big pharma behemoth with a long list of fraud and corruption charges, was in fact evil. | |
| The left-wing fake liberal anti-capitalist types quickly took to their Apple iPhones to demand Hollywood dump the actor. | |
| They're daring to call out an enormous corporation that's previously been forced to pay billions in fines for drug frauds. | |
| The anti-capitalists, they hate billionaires, apart from Bill Gates and George Soros and all the other big pharma types. | |
| They're making their billions, but they're doing it to save us. | |
| For all of those that are ignoring their own fears and buyers' remorse to attack people like Levi, there are others that, whilst admitting they were duped, refuse to take any responsibility for it. | |
| Why didn't you try and warn us? | |
| Well, we did. | |
| You called me a grifter, sent me a tinfoil hat meme. | |
| The BBC ran a story last week stating that lockdowns have been linked to a tenfold rise in child porn imagery. | |
| Yet another win for the lockdown lovers. | |
| If it saves just one life, well, it didn't save a single life, but it destroyed countless. | |
| So take a bow. | |
| Now go on, own it. | |
| Well played. | |
| These are almost always, with the odd exception, the same people that are currently cheering on the escalation in Ukraine. | |
| They'll claim, as they did with lockdowns, masks and mandates, that they're being virtuous. | |
| It comes from a place of love and compassion. | |
| Go on, poke Russia a nuclear powerhouse with a stick, it'll be fine. | |
| The same people that have been tweeting Boris the liar for the last 20 years are now sharing his claims that Putin threatened him as if it's the gospel truth. | |
| I've seen the Downing Street readout of that conversation from February last year and it doesn't once mention a single threat. | |
| What are you lying for? | |
| Just as a test, let's pass a law that states anyone publicly calling for escalation or acts that will blatantly lead to a powder keg, whether that be in politics or the media, should be the first sent to the front line when the inevitable kickoff occurs. | |
| Let's make Boris Johnson lead the troops into battle atop a white horse, atop a horse with a strong back, and see how committed he is to defeating those pesky Russians. | |
| Because it's easy to throw a hand grenade when you're nowhere near the blast and surrounded by round-the-clock security. | |
| It's easy to send other people's children to die. | |
| And it's easy to say, we all need to tighten our belts and dig in when you've got millions in the bank. | |
| Now, of course, if this law was passed, the salads would all be calling for de-escalation and peace talks immediately. | |
| This is Right Now. | |
| We've all heard of Agenda 2030. | |
| Now, some think it's a far-out conspiracy theory, and others may believe it's a much-needed plan to avert a climate catastrophe. | |
| But most people don't actually know that much about it. | |
| They certainly wouldn't have read the documentation in any great detail. | |
| But our first guest this evening certainly has. | |
| Sandy Adams is an expert on the subject, and we're very happy to welcome her onto the show. | |
| Sandy, just briefly, because I'm sure you've answered this a million times probably, just what is Agenda 2030 and how is it going to affect our lives? | |
| Well, Agenda 2030 was this plan implemented at the Earth Summit in 1992. | |
| And it was really a way of bringing us under top-down government global control. | |
| And that happened in 1992. | |
| And we're really seeing it rolling out now. | |
| And one of their biggest things was to bring in digital ID. | |
| Which is why I'm here today is to speak about the plan to bring digital digital ID into the UK by December. | |
| And that's quite worrying because there's been no obviously no impact, digital impact on privacy on this particular It's called the Draft Legislation to Support Identity Verification. | |
| It's online. | |
| You have to put that into the search engine because nobody has told you it's there. | |
| And you have to fill it in by March 1st. | |
| And then it goes into secondary legislation. | |
| And if it's not opposed, if we don't make enough noise about it, it will be implemented by December of this year, which is really concerning. | |
| Because, you know, this is really when Big Brother becomes big data. | |
| And it is within the 17 goals of Agenda 21 to have us all under digital identity by 2025. | |
| So they're implementing this now, but they want us first for some reason. | |
| I think Britain is really under the cosh. | |
| It's about permissions and compliance. | |
| This will actually unlock, your digital ID will unlock your ID and to actually gain, get access to normal goods and services that you would in a normal free world. | |
| So, to try and explain this and why it's so important that people go online and fill this in, it's a very, very loaded document. | |
| I've made YouTube videos on how to pick it apart. | |
| Look at me on Rumble, you'll find me. | |
| And how to answer these questions because they are quite loaded. | |
| And really, it's about addressing, you know, the elephant in the room is the acceleration of this sort of pernicious artificial intelligence using facial recognition. | |
| Because what will happen is that we are about to enter the zero trust world, which is normally we have VPN, where we just literally open our computers and we have access to Search engines, all that kind of stuff. | |
| That is about to end. | |
| We are entering the zero trust world where you will need authentication to actually access every single area of your life. | |
| Be it doing a transaction in a supermarket, your financial transactions, your health data, Whatever it is, you will have to authenticate, and within that authentication process, you will be data harvesting every part of your data. | |
| So this is really big and, you know, I'm really making a noise about this because they snuck it in the back door. | |
| This consultation went up just after New Year, when nobody was looking and everybody was getting on to the 15-minute cities, quite rightly, because that's all part of Agenda 21. | |
| And really, this has been snuck through the back door, hoping that nobody will fill it in and it can go straight to secondary legislation and be operational by December. | |
| So it's a bit concerning. | |
| Yeah, I can tell by the way you're so animated about it, Sandy, that actually it's, you know, a massive, a massive thing. | |
| I mean, to play devil's advocate, because what I'll do is I'll ask you the questions that I would get asked if I started talking about this. | |
| Whenever I talk about this kind of stuff, digital ID, you get the same as it was with CCTV. | |
| Well, if you're not doing anything wrong, what's the problem? | |
| That's what you tend to get back. | |
| Yeah, they always say that. | |
| I mean, yes, the thing is that when you've got all your data in one place, it's easier to be to be hacked or to get into the wrong hands. | |
| This is why we're given multiple passwords whenever we use anything. | |
| And the banks have always advocated using different passwords for different things. | |
| But the thing is that this whole system is really, it's about selling your data. | |
| What people don't understand is that it's your data they want. | |
| They don't really care about your privacy. | |
| It's not about privacy. | |
| That's a red herring. | |
| What they're interested in is your data. | |
| And if you understand that data is the new gold, they're trying to create this new circular economy where the actual economy is based on social credit and carbon credits. | |
| So really, when you go into a shop in the future, and not too distant future, because all the human tools are going, you know, we're getting these self-service tools, and they've all got facial recognition, if anybody doesn't realize that. | |
| That's why I always try and find a human to because the facial recognition will unlock your digital ID. | |
| And in the future, they'll have supermarkets and not so distant future because Tesco's are working on all this biometrics. | |
| The biometrics are in place for all of this. | |
| The infrastructure is in place for all this to happen very, very quickly. | |
| So they're putting doors, instead of shelves, you're going to have doors, glass doors, where all the goods are. | |
| And what happens is that they're getting rid of the staff and it'll be quite a quiet place, supermarkets. | |
| So you'll go in and if you want to access certain goods, That maybe, you've maybe overstepped your carbon credits or whatever it is, your facial recognition will not unlock those doors, so you don't have access to those goods. | |
| So basically like, Sandy, so you say, you've had beef once this month, Sandy, so I'm afraid that door's not going to open for you this time. | |
| Basically that's what you're saying, isn't it? | |
| Yeah, and it will be the same with if you've done something to, or said something that they don't like. | |
| Now, this is quite important for people like me and you, you know, that your bank account can, you know, this is all considered to be a privilege. | |
| The data is a privilege, which they have control over. | |
| And that privilege can be taken away at any point. | |
| You know, the data, the digital ID is a privilege, and that can be taken away at any point. | |
| So you may not be able to access your bank account if you are a bad person in the social credit system that they're creating, because it's just like China. | |
| This is the thing, Sandy. | |
| People don't realise this. | |
| I've had conversations with lots of people where you would talk about subjects like this and they think it's so far-fetched. | |
| Oh, that's insane. | |
| That's something from a sci-fi film. | |
| And you say to them, you do realise they're already doing this in China. | |
| Bear in mind, our governments all over the West, no one ever calls out China. | |
| You know, we always admire China, you know, how they dealt with COVID and X, Y and Z. And so I say to these people, you know that there's people in China, I think it's like, you know, a million people in China that aren't allowed to use the train. | |
| They're not allowed to fly. | |
| Or whatever, because their social credit score isn't high enough. | |
| And they go, really? | |
| And it's like, this is exactly what they want. | |
| Do you think, Sandy, that, because I believe anyway, at least, that all these different things are connected, but this cost of living crisis, or rather cost of lockdown crisis, all these things that are happening, these energy prices that they're using Russia as an excuse for that, they're destroying people, they're destroying the economy. | |
| And that actually, that's completely intentional, because a desperate population will almost leap at a chance to, we'll save the economy if we just do this. | |
| Oh God, yeah, please do then, because I'm hungry. | |
| You know, do you think that maybe the two things are connected? | |
| I do, and you know, this is really a difficult thing to look at, because it is quite dystopian, and it upsets me. | |
| I've got grandchildren, I've got children, This is not a world I want them to grow up in, and I'm sure you feel the same way. | |
| Anybody would. | |
| But the thing is that this is actually happening, unfortunately. | |
| There is this control mechanism. | |
| It's been actually worked on for a long, long time. | |
| And we've got this window of opportunity to try and oppose this consultation. | |
| And in our present legal system, the only way we can actually oppose it, we can say on that consultation, Oh, we think that this is, you know, this is some kind of terrible control mechanism and you're trying to, you know, data harvesters or whatever. | |
| They will just say, no, no, no, we've got all the right guys on our side, making sure that you're safe. | |
| You know, would you trust our government? | |
| This is being brought out by the Cabinet Office. | |
| Would you trust the Cabinet Office? | |
| Because I certainly don't. | |
| They ran out the whole, you know, the whole COVID lockdown restrictions. | |
| So we know that they're not to be trusted. | |
| And what we've got to do is argue this, and just as guidance when you fill that form in, and please fill it in, because we have to make a noise about this, bombard them with emails, there's an email on the form, everything. | |
| But the thing is that we have to do it with provable. | |
| Provable harms, because they do ask in the consultation, could this adversely affect certain members of society? | |
| And yes, it could. | |
| One of them is that, you know, we could be cyber attacks approvable. | |
| They happened all the time and they can't actually, you know, guard against that. | |
| And there's other things like Certain sections of society could be adversely affected because they can't access the technology in order to fill it in because it's online. | |
| The elderly and the very poor, yeah. | |
| Exactly. | |
| And also there's a worry of children. | |
| Children are kind of hyper-vulnerable and so They use these digital devices more than any other group. | |
| Who is taking their data and where is it going? | |
| And that is a big, big problem for me and I'm sure for many, many people. | |
| Absolutely. | |
| What can we do about it? | |
| Because obviously you're saying to fill in the forms and talk about the consultation, but if the inevitable happens, which using Sadiq Khan as an example, extending the ULEZ emissions area in London and openly saying, well, because it's going to save lives, actually I don't need to have a referendum or a consultation on it. | |
| Do you think we can actually make a difference in a political way, or is it a case of, well, they're going to do it anyway, so actually maybe we just need to be a bit more grassroots, which is, you know, ditch your smartphones. | |
| Just don't go along with it. | |
| I think do both. | |
| I mean, this was batted off in 2017 and 2021 by Taiwan and using the arguments I've just said about identity theft, digital fraud, financial fraud, cyber attacks, all that kind of thing. | |
| They managed to get it thrown out. | |
| I know that's Taiwan and they currently don't have it because they threw it out in 2017 and I think 2021. | |
| So, you know, I think we should do both. | |
| We still have to have a grassroots campaign about no, absolutely no, we do not comply to this. | |
| We haven't asked for it. | |
| It hasn't been sufficiently risk assessed in a digital impact Absolutely. | |
| assessment. And they will come up with all sorts of ideas that yes, they have assessed | |
| it and it's safe. It's a bit like the science is settled, technology is never settled. Anybody | |
| will always hack something. We're better off just not having it, really. But they need | |
| it to gain the control that they need and to literally support this economy on our data | |
| that they've got planned. And they've got it already that our data is going to be sold | |
| on the human capital markets, on the blockchain, and all the impact investors get their rewards | |
| with non-fungible tokens on the blockchain. | |
| So all your data is just it's just a currency and is that is that right? | |
| No of course it's not it's terrible. | |
| No it feels like it feels like the UK is a test ground even long before COVID, you know, when people couldn't understand HS1 and HS2, how this money was being hemorrhaged. | |
| And it's like, well, just watch the Hunger Games, man. | |
| Just watch that film, you know, and breaking everything up into regions. | |
| No private car ownership or anything like it. | |
| Certainly, it certainly looks like that's what they're going for. | |
| And that's why your work is so important, Sandy. | |
| So thank you so much for coming on to the show. | |
| Thank you for all the work that you're doing. | |
| I can see you're passionate and you're like literally like almost wanting to shout from the rooftops at people. | |
| But where can people at home Find this consultation again. | |
| You showed it at the beginning, but... | |
| This consultation, you can find it online. | |
| Just type into Google, the Consultation on Draft Legislation to Support Identity Verification. | |
| They couldn't make it longer, could they? | |
| The Consultation on Draft Legislation to Support Identity Verification. | |
| And there's an email address as well. | |
| Bombard them with emails, you know, really voicing your disquiet at this. | |
| It's absolutely appalling what they're trying to do. | |
| And the fact that they've snuck it in the back door, nobody knows it's there. | |
| We need to make lots of noise about this. | |
| I mean, I'm just setting up right now an AVAZ sort of petition thing so that people can access that and I'll be putting that up. | |
| So yeah, I think we've just got to make loads of noise and say absolutely not. | |
| And, you know, these biometrics are just there to collect your data. | |
| It's got nothing to do with, you know, keeping you safe. | |
| That's what they're selling it as. | |
| Yeah. | |
| Absolutely. | |
| Absolutely. | |
| Thank you so much, Sandy. | |
| Thank you. | |
| Thank you very much for having me on. |
Export Selection