All Episodes
Feb. 11, 2022 - David Icke
45:03
A Next Stage Of The Cult Agenda: Tidal Wave Of Censorship And Economic Collapse - David Icke Dot-Con
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, so
so hello and welcome to the David Icke dot connector video
cast Well, there's been a lot of good news recently in terms of the restrictions being rolled back by many countries, although don't tell that to people in Italy and Austria and many other places where the fascism is still intense.
And We should not, however, let our guard down and think this is over, because it's not over.
This is a global agenda to transform human society.
And it's operating on multiple levels.
This COVID hoax is one very important, but only one expression of it.
And let's not forget that it takes one, oh, we're all going to die, deadly variant for this lot to kick back in.
And there are other areas that we should be very much focused on.
And two are the extraordinary levels of censorship that are about to be imposed.
And if people say, oh, well, what do you mean about to be imposed?
We've had all this censorship. It's terrible.
Yeah. But I'm talking even more extreme levels than we've seen so far.
And the other area is the economy.
This global cult wants to replace the present economic system with a totally different one under its great reset.
And to bring in the new, they have to destroy the old.
And that is what we are in the process of witnessing now.
But in the end, it all comes down To the ability to communicate information, evidence, background about what's happening to the population.
Because obviously they're not going to get that from the mainstream media or Silicon Valley.
So it has to come from the alternative media.
And so far, although we've had all this censorship, ingenuity and determination in the alternative media has managed to circulate the truth about what's going on to enormous numbers of people.
And that, have no doubt, has had an impact on this backpedaling for the moment.
of the COVID restrictions in many countries.
Now imagine, when the next crisis is played, because it's coming, if there was so much censorship That no information could circulate because they'd mopped up all avenues of communication outside the mainstream.
How would people have access to anything but government authority narratives then?
They wouldn't. And this is what we are seeing happening All around us and there's some big things coming including two changes in the law in the UK which is following a trend around the world that will target freedom and the ability of the alternative media to function in Britain in ways we've never seen before.
Now, I wrote a long, long time ago that the plan was eventually that no one would ever see or hear anything that authority didn't sanction.
And we are heading to that point now so fast.
The internet and the internet corporations have been an example of fishing line out, fishing line in.
The internet is founded on technology Overseen by DARPA, the technological development arm of the Pentagon that claims credit for the Internet.
And the idea was that the Internet would become the central pillar of human society and absolutely the central pillar of communication of information within human society.
But if the internet had been censored as it is now from the start, then they wouldn't have got to that point where it's the central pillar.
Because people would have said, well, I'm not using that.
They'd bloody censor you. And the same cult behind DARPA and the internet has been behind the creation of these internet near-monopoly giants like Google.
Google owned YouTube and Facebook, etc.
And so they created them.
And of course, for them to reach their current near monopoly status, they had to, they had to allow the free flow of information.
Google started out without YouTube and then bought it up.
And turned it into a near monopoly for video.
And what it means is you build your audience through not censoring until you reach the point, like the internet, the central pillar of human society, you reach the point where you have such market share of communication That you think you can go for what the plan was all along.
And the censorship started.
You had demonetization, first of all, of the alternative media and then outright censorship.
I've been censored from all the main platforms since April 2020 for telling the truth.
It's now increasingly being confirmed about the Covid hoax.
And the idea is to silence all opposition to the government narrative.
So the government narrative is all that people hear.
And if you look at the consequences of that in relation to COVID, what these platforms are doing systematically for the cult that owns them, Is denying informed consent.
Informed consent that should happen according to the Nuremberg Code.
So, here we have a situation where a CEO of a major insurance company in America has said that Excess deaths from all causes, and if you look at the period he's talking about, it's the period of the fake vaccines.
Excess deaths from all causes have increased by 40% in working age people between 18 and 64.
And he said that a 10% increase In excess deaths would be a 1 in 200 year catastrophe.
And here we have four times that in the period of these fake vaccines.
We're seeing sports people more and more keeling over, dying or having their careers destroyed by heart problems.
And while this is going on, These internet platforms and the mainstream media in general are censoring exposure of the dangers and denying the public informed consent.
And they are responsible People like Zuckerberg at Facebook, Brennan Page at Google, Alphabet, Wojcicki at YouTube, Agrawal, and before him, Dorsey at Twitter.
They are all responsible for everyone who has died or had their health destroyed by this fake vaccine.
Who, if they'd have had access to another story, another way of looking at it, more of the information that these platforms are censoring, they would not have had the fake vaccine and they wouldn't have died and had their health destroyed for life and their life shortened often.
So they are responsible for every one of those people.
And these psychopaths in charge of these platforms have to go before a Nuremberg trial.
And I include in that a man that everyone should know about called Imran Ahmed.
Imran Ahmed is a former Labour Party activist in Britain who is now a professional censor operating across the Atlantic in Britain and the United States who is targeting for censorship anyone who is putting a different view Of the COVID hoax and of these fake vaccines.
And it's interesting because Imran Ahmed started out in this organization called the Center for Countering Digital Hate, targeting people for censorship before COVID on the grounds that they were racist and anti-Semitic and all that stuff.
The moment the COVID card was played, he morphed seamlessly from attacking people on the grounds of silence them, they're racist, to silence them, they're putting out misinformation.
That's cult code for the truth.
Putting out misinformation about COVID and the fake vaccines.
And he is constantly in the media getting softball questions.
Yes, Mr.
Ahmed. No, Mr.
Ahmed. So that he can demonize those questioning authority narratives.
And here he is, Seeking to demonize the thoroughly decent Robert Kennedy Jr.
over challenging the fake vaccines.
One organization that aims to counter disinformation has been tracking him.
RFK Jr. is one of the top anti-vaxxers in the world.
He has a charity, the Children's Health Defense, which is a US tax-exempt charitable organization from which he earns a quarter of a million dollars a year as its chief exec, and which has been one of the super-spreaders of misinformation about vaccines.
How exactly do they target African-American people?
If you create the right content, it's like a homing missile.
Like you just released a meme and the algorithms guide it to the right place.
You know, RFK Jr., when he launched his documentary, he had memes ready, designed to spread them and target and drive people back to his video.
They know what they're doing.
How effective is it?
Does it actually work? It's incredibly effective because what you're doing is you're picking up on people's pre-existing fears, prejudices, the misinformation they've been fed over time and the Tuskegee thing is based on misinformation.
I've heard of the Tuskegee Institute program where they took African-American men and shot them up with syphilis.
Tuskegee is the story of how African Americans were starved of an effective cure to a disease.
But the way that they've been telling it is African American peoples were deliberately infected with the disease.
And, of course, that's not what happened.
But if you can pepper people with enough misinformation, it's giving them another reason not to get off their bums and go and take a vaccine.
So to a community that has disproportionately suffered the burden of coronavirus death and morbidity, he's then saying, oh, by the way, we know you're dying en masse.
Don't take the vaccine either.
That'll kill you. And what's that going to do?
It's going to compound the harm done to that community.
So here's the question.
Who benefits from what Imran Ahmed is doing?
Who benefits from people challenging and questioning and exposing the content and effect of these fake vaccines?
And challenging the fascism imposed in the name of COVID. Who benefits from that?
No one in the mainstream media are going to ask him that.
When is the question going to be posed, who the hell are you to decide and dictate what anyone can see or hear?
And in doing so, he again is seeking to deny informed consent of the public and And access to all possible ways of looking at this and the jabs.
And not just the government's version.
And I will not rest until this man is also in front of a Nuremberg jury answering the
question why did you do that?
There are two pieces of legislation.
Well, one's a piece of legislation.
The other one is proposals.
Proposals designed to become legislation in the UK that just capture this trend that I'm talking about.
One, going through Parliament now, is called the Online Safety Bill.
Now, this is Sold as targeting child sexual abuse, terrorism, racial hatred, incitement to violence.
That's the sales pitch.
But what it's really about is targeting the alternative media and The law would give the government broadcast regulator called Ofcom the ability to decide if any information posted online was harmful.
And they include in their definition of harmful misinformation.
The cult code for the truth.
And anyone that doesn't take down what Ofcom demands will face massive fines and even jail.
And they can decide, according to this legislation they're pushing through, that something is harmful Even though what he said is lawful and legal.
So something you could say in the street perfectly, legally, lawfully, can be taken down from the internet by Ofcom if they simply decide that in their opinion it is harmful.
And I'll tell you how bad Ofcom is.
It was created by Tony Blair in 2001.
It was Ofcom that put out a decree in terms of what can be discussed and what can't in the spring of 2020 that deleted me from the entire mainstream broadcast media.
Who, of course, gutlessly complied.
So that's the mentality you're dealing with.
And it's the same scam that Tony Blair played with stealing children from loving parents.
He brought in a new category to allow social services to steal children from loving parents called emotional harm.
So they don't have to find any physical harm or any of that kind of evidence.
They just have to say, well, there's emotional harm on the child, took the child away.
And as a result, enormous numbers of children have been taken from loving parents.
Can you imagine that? What that must feel like?
And the same harm Is being introduced in this online safety bill to take away the right of people to have access to an opinion and to put information online that the authorities don't want people to see.
So we have a story this week about this.
Which says Mark Zuckerberg could face jail time under new law, Minister warns.
What a joke. US or UK Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries said big tech bosses could absolutely be held responsible for failing to remove harmful online content.
Meta New word for Facebook.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other big tech executives risk ending up in jail if their social media platforms do not block content deemed harmful.
Under upcoming online safety laws, UK Culture Secretary Nadine Dorris has warned.
Absolute bloody baloney!
This law, this online safety bill, is about targeting the alternative media and stopping all challenge and exposure of authority and its narratives.
And like I say, how will that play out when the next crisis is manufactured?
And the ability to expose it is removed.
That's the idea, of course it is.
Ofcom is a fascist organization, facilitator of fascism.
That's its job.
That's why Blair created it.
This is Big Brother Watch and their view on this bill.
Government's online safety bill poses greatest threat to UK free speech in living memory.
Big Brother Watch has launched a new report warning against the censorious online safety bill and sounding the alarm on the rise of big tech speech police.
They say online platforms are misinformation...
Policies are shutting down online discussions about public health policy.
That's absolutely why it's happening.
Because the COVID narrative for the last two years has been so ludicrous, so easy to dismantle.
The only way you can defend it is to silence those dismantling it.
The government's little known counter disinformation unit Big Brother Watch says, pressures social media companies already to take down lawful speech.
Far from reining in social media companies, the campaigners say, the government is seeking a share of the extraordinary power to suppress and censor lawful speech on a scale never seen before.
And most of these bloody MPs in Westminster are all in favour of this.
And if anyone's in favour of the online safety bill, they are in favour of fascism.
The Big Brother Watch report dissects the government's bill, which the civil liberties group warns would increase online censorship and pose a serious threat to online free speech in the UK. On Twitter, scores of users have been suspended or banned in the course of debates about sex and gender, or for allegedly misgendering other users with terms such as cis or dude.
And Big Brother Watch's research also found a growth in arbitrary political censorship, with political party posts and civil society group posts shut down without justification.
And this is how it works.
It's sold to people as governments saying, we're going to take on the big tech giants and we're going to find them and all that stuff.
The UK government is owned by the global cult.
The big tech giants like Facebook and Google are owned by the global cult.
So what this bill is doing is giving the tech giants more excuse for even more extreme censorship because they'll say, well, we've got to do it because we'll get fined by the government if we don't.
Complete sleight of hand, all of it.
So this is Mark Johnson, legal and policy officer at Big Brother Watch, and he said this.
The bill does absolutely nothing to help police deal with real crime online, but rather focuses the lens on ordinary people's conversations.
Exactly. The bill will force social media companies, willingly, to suppress lawful content which is controversial, counter-cultural, or offensive.
These new rules will leave us with two tiers of speech, where speech that's permitted on the street is not allowed online.
So what they do, you see, You remember the mantra when the censorship really went into overdrive with COVID. People say, well, if you don't like getting censored by Facebook and Google and Twitter, well, start your own platforms.
So people did.
And successfully.
But the idea, going back to what I said a long time ago, is that The point is reached where no one ever hears or sees anything that is not sanctioned by authority.
And with that goal, know the outcome and you'll see the journey, then all of the alternative media has to go.
And that's what this online safety bill Is really all about targeting these platforms that have been created and websites that have been created to bypass the mainstream internet censorship.
And then there's another proposal of the UK government which is to replace the Human Rights Act With something they call a Bill of Rights.
And the Bill of Rights, they are proposing, will undermine human rights.
This is a part of this whole mass censorship and deletion of Freedom that's going on and why the rollback in a number of countries of the COVID restrictions for now should not divert us from the bigger picture of what's going on.
So this Bill of Rights will mean you will need to seek permission To bring a human rights case to court.
Human rights will no longer be universal, but judged by the courts.
Society should be given more rights than the individual.
Now this is extremely relevant, not least of the last two years.
Society should be given more rights, this reform says, than the individual.
Which means whatever the government decides for the greater good will be more important than individual rights.
Mandatory fake vaccinations, anybody?
Once you move freedom from the individual To the collective.
Or you move right from the individual to the collective.
You are going down the road to tyranny.
So, what's happening in Austria now, mandatory fake vaccinations for everybody, says the lying of course but that says the collective is more important than individual rights and that's what this proposal in the UK is saying.
Court checks and balances on government will be massively diluted and of course we've already had moves To dilute the right to protest.
So, you know, please don't fall for the idea that this, for however long it lasts, rollback of COVID restrictions means that it's kind of over and we're going back to normal.
That's not the idea.
The picture is much, much bigger than that.
And I'm talking here about the UK, but Let's go to the United States.
Department of Homeland Security suggests those who spread misleading narratives that undermine trust in the US government, does anyone have any, are terrorists.
This is where it's all going.
The Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin warning of a heightened terrorism alert in the United States.
One of the key factors of the heightened threat, it says, which is considered terrorism, is the proliferation of false or misleading narratives which sow discord and undermine public trust in US government institutions.
U.S. government and its institutions are genetic liars.
It's an essential career move if you want the job.
But to expose that is to undermine trust in a lying government and lying institutions.
As an excuse, To silence the exposure.
Everywhere you look, whatever country, you're seeing the same theme, the same direction.
So examples cited in this bulletin of terrorism include false or misleading narratives about unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.
Now when this lot goes through, if it's allowed to go through, when they bring that next crisis, how's it going to be exposed?
That's the idea.
So the bulletin is titled, Summary of Terrorism Threat to the US Homeland.
And reads as follows.
The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment.
Here we go. Filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories and other forms of mis and dis and mal information.
Introduced and or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors.
These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest which could potentially inspire acts of violence.
So, We can see the trend and where it's going.
And the ability to communicate is fundamental to everything.
The most basic freedoms, but also to expose what's happening.
Just think of the Covid era.
No alternative media.
Silence, nothing.
Just the mainstream media.
Just the government narrative.
Where would we be now?
they wouldn't be rolling back COVID restrictions anywhere.
And another massive area that's heading towards us is demolition of the global
economy in a process you might call creative destruction.
If you look at how this cult has taken the world in the direction it has over a long long period, It's by continually destroying the status quo of the moment.
They destroy the status quo, they put in another status quo, which is further along the road to their outcome of global Orwellian fascist dictatorship.
First World War changed the world.
New status quo.
Second World War changed even more.
New status quo.
And look at the world in 2019.
And it's not the world of today.
Another status quo is gone.
So, if you want to bring in an entire new economic system of total control with a one-world digital currency and all that goes with it, Then you've got to destroy the status quo.
And that is what they are doing.
While people were concentrating, quite rightly, on COVID restrictions and fascism and the jab, absolutely, we should be focused on that.
But other things were playing out in the COVID era as a result of COVID, the COVID hoax, that are now becoming more and more obvious.
And one of them is that the world economy was hold below the waterline, and it is now clearly starting to sink.
Not least through a tidal wave of inflation that's now becoming obvious, but we've seen nothing yet.
This global cult wants a global society centrally controlled.
It wants an end to countries. I've been pointing this out for decades.
It wants an end to countries. And if you look at what's happened in the period of Covid, is just fantastic amounts of money have just been conjured out of nothing by governments and money no object has been thrown at Covid.
To the point where countries are absolutely, well, bankrupt.
This is a story from this week.
It was announced a couple of weeks ago that the US debt had passed 30 trillion dollars.
Unimaginable. But according to this report, if you put all the debt on the table, The US debt is $123 trillion.
According to a recent report from the non-partisan American think tank Truth in Accounting, the true size of the US national debt is actually $123 trillion.
Amounting to a $796,000 burden on every taxpayer.
Levels of debt like that are unrepayable.
It's cuckoo land.
And the idea, I've been pointing this out through the decades, Is that a crash of the global economy that you would hear on bloody Mars is being planned to destroy the status quo of the global economy as it is, so that these agents of the cult can come forward and say, we can sort it out, but...
And part of the sorting it out is, we'll get rid of the debt...
But you must give us all your assets, all your possessions, as part of the deal.
And that is the origin of the World Economic Forums, many times quoted, you will own nothing, but you will be happy.
And so it's vital that we keep our eyes on the ball.
And don't think this is starting to go away.
It's not. And in terms of censorship, which is the bottom line, because I can't say enough, if you can't communicate and expose this stuff, how are people going to know what's really going on?
What we mustn't do Is apologize when we are attacked for what we say or what we give a platform for others to say.
Joe Rogan, of course, has been in the middle of this big controversy over his show on Spotify.
Spotify banned me in the spring of 2020.
Talk to me about censorship, Joe.
But he did show signs this week, Joe Rogan, of apologizing.
And, you know, people talk about the cancel culture, where people are just silenced.
But fundamental to the cancel culture is what I call the sackcloth culture.
And that is people falling to their knees and asking for forgiveness For expressing the basic human right of your own opinion.
And if we appease the mob, if we try to appease the mob, we'll realize an obvious fact from history.
The mob is never appeased.
And this woke mob is never appeased.
The more you appease it, the more appeasement it wants until it's destroyed you, which is its goal all along.
So we need some backbone.
And we certainly need to push back on these fascist destructions of freedom via the ability to communicate.
Information to expose the scam.
So, this period, this play for total global control is not over.
It's only just begun.
According to the paper, the system allows the fetus to grow more safely and efficiently than it does within the natural setting of a woman's womb.
You see the movement here?
Oh, the technology is better than a natural woman's womb, so...
The coronavirus pandemic started in China.
Oxygen, medical supply, and physical strength...
Stage one, you create a problem.
It could be a manufactured virus.
You want a reaction, and you want them to either say, do something, or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done.
So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population.
They want to reduce the numbers.
Export Selection