All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 20, 2022 - David Icke
53:26
By The Way.... There's Still No 'Virus' - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, so
so Hello and welcome to the David Icke dot connector video
cast.
Well, I've been saying since the spring of 2020 that there is no virus.
And in all this time since then, I'm still waiting for the evidence that the COVID virus actually exists.
That's the scale of the deceit that we're looking at.
But this week, a member of the alternative media, Joseph McCullough, came out with an article saying that the virus does scientifically exist.
And he was quoting overwhelmingly a journalist called Jeremy Hammond.
Now in another video, which I've got on davidite.com with this one, the American doctor, Andrew Kaufman, dismantles the article and a video as well, step by step by step from a science point of view and a medical point of view.
So I'll leave that side of it to him.
And I'm going to come from another angle to this.
But before I do, I just want to mention and highlight the last paragraph in McCullough's article.
He says this. Either way, I believe it's scientifically accurate to claim that SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, genetically sequenced, and that it exists as a pathogenic entity.
This is the key paragraph.
Getting too far into the weeds of theories that refute the existence of viruses altogether will only slow down and hamper the truth movement rather than aid it along.
And I would strongly discourage anyone from engaging in this highly unproductive narrative.
Now I find that absolutely extraordinary.
Because what it's saying is, That the truth movement should not pursue the truth of whether there is such a thing as a virus given what the claims about the COVID virus have done to the world, have done to freedom, have done to people's lives, have done to the global economy, have done to our children.
But we shouldn't pursue that because it's unproductive.
Are you having a laugh?
So the bottom line is that if you're going to show that a virus or anything else A exists or causes a disease then you have to isolate, purify What you claim is the infective agent, let's call it a virus, from other genetic material in the sample that you're dealing with.
Otherwise, how on earth do you know that what you claim is there, is there?
Or what you claim it causes, it causes.
You can't. So, this is not...
Pedantics. It's up to those that claim there is a virus that causes, quote, COVID, to show that that's true.
And from the very start, the Chinese were admitting that this COVID virus had not been isolated.
Here's the chief epidemiologist of the Chinese CDC confirming this very thing very early on in this COVID hoax.
Why has the data not been shared?
No, they didn't isolate the virus.
That's the issue.
No, they didn't isolate the virus.
That's the issue.
And there is no scientific paper, whatever they may claim, That has shown the proper purification and isolation of the alleged COVID virus ever since.
Now, here's a short clip of a guy called Luc Montagnier...
Who won the Nobel Prize for, it is said, discovering the HIV virus, which is supposed to cause AIDS. And again, the existence of the HIV virus has never been shown in the way that I'm describing.
And yet it's supposed to cause AIDS. Well, for instance, Freddie Mercury, the great Queen singer, didn't actually die of AIDS. He died from a drug called AZT. AZT was so toxic it was brought out as a chemotherapy drug to treat cancer, but it was so toxic.
Can you imagine a chemotherapy drug deemed too toxic that it was taken out of use?
And so when AIDS came along and Fauci was involved in all this as well, They brought AZT off the shelf, and what did AZT do?
It destroyed the immune system.
That's what it did with its toxicity.
Freddie Mercury was told that he had tested positive for HIV and took AZT, which destroyed his immune system, and they said he died of AIDS, which is the In the official narrative, the destruction of the immune system.
That technique is exactly the one that's been used with the COVID virus and all that's followed.
No coincidence that a very famous basketball player in America called Magic Johnson tested positive for HIV Went on AZT. Thank you, Fauci.
Got very sick and cut off it.
Magic Johnson is still alive today.
So the HIV story is to such an extent the COVID virus story.
But anyway, here's Luke Montagnier who got the Nobel Prize for finding HIV. Describing why it is so important to purify a virus to show that there is one.
Okay, I think I was taught wrong then.
I was taught that the purification part was to get all the proteins from the virus.
No. What's the purpose of the purification then?
Well, to make sure You have a real virus.
So, to show a virus exists, you need to purify it, which means removing it so it's only in and of itself removing it from all other genetic material.
OK, but that hasn't been done with the Covid virus.
So how do they know it exists and how do they know it causes what they claim it causes?
There have been Freedom of Information Act requests galore that have gone out all over the world to governments and medical authorities asking for any scientific paper, any scientific confirmation that they have isolated and purified this SARS-2 alleged virus to show it exists and therefore that it causes anything.
Not one of those requests has led to a single scientific paper showing that it has been purified and isolated.
Which brings us to the very foundation of the scam.
Which is a test called the PCR, and others too, but particularly this one, that is not testing for the virus.
It's not capable, as its creator Kerry Mullis said, of testing and diagnosing infectious disease.
But in January 2020, kind of out of nowhere, just at the right time, along came a German virologist called Christian Drosten with a protocol which was not peer-reviewed, but was immediately supported and recommended to the countries of the world by the World Health Organization.
A protocol for using the PCR test to test for The COVID quote virus.
But it has been admitted that they did not have any of the natural virus to Create their test and their protocol.
They were using a synthetic gene to simulate the genome of the virus and that is why we did it very quickly.
And that quote comes from a regular co-author with Drosten called Overt Land.
Who runs the company that then marketed the test and the protocol.
So, the test from the start was based on a computer program of the alleged virus and not the natural virus.
Well, we know why, because the Chinese CDC epidemiologists said the problem is the virus not being isolated.
And then we have documents with the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA in America, pointing out that their various versions of the PCR test that they sanctioned, given emergency sanction, also came from Things like synthetic versions of the, quote, virus.
So, that is what this COVID virus is and always has been.
It's a computer program.
They made it up.
And Andrew Kaufman in the accompanying video explains how it was done.
So, when you look at all these images everywhere of the COVID virus, they're computer generated images.
They have no connection to what's actually happening in the body.
It's a computer concoction.
So, How do they decide that there is such a thing as a virus and that it causes what they claim to cause?
Well, stick with me here, because I'm going to go through a description of what happens.
And it's a shocker.
If you've not come across this before, it's a shocker.
And the thing to remember is that This COVID virus was claimed to exist and claimed to cause COVID-19 on the basis of exactly the same process.
This is an American doctor called Tom Cowan that I quote in Perceptions of a Renegade Mind.
And he charts back this virus fantasy technique to a Nobel Prize winner called John Enders, who lived from 1897 to 1985.
He's an American biomedical scientist and has been dubbed the father of modern vaccines.
So Enders claimed to have discovered a process Of the viral culture, as it's called, to prove that a virus caused measles.
So Cowan explains how Enders did this by using the exact same procedure that has been followed by every virologist to characterize every new virus since 1954, including this one.
Enders took throat swabs from children with measles and immersed them in milk, and penicillin and streptomycin antibiotics were added, and the whole mix was centrifuged, rotated at high speed, to separate large cellular debris from small particles and molecules, as with milk and cream, for example.
Cowan says that if the aim is to find little particles of genetic material, viruses, in the snot, as he calls it, from children with measles, it would seem that the last thing you would do is mix the snot with other material, i.e. milk, that also has genetic material.
How are you ever going to know whether whatever you found came from the snot or the milk?
He asks.
He points out that streptomycin is a drug that's poisonous to kidneys.
And you'll see the relevance of that shortly, the shocking relevance of that.
Cowan says that it gets worse, much worse, when Endes describes the culture medium upon which the virus grows.
The culture medium consisted of bovine amniotic fluid Beef embryo extract, horse serum, antibiotics, and phenol red as an indicator of cell metabolism.
What they also do, and this is what they've done with this one, is they deny the tissue in the sample nutrients.
So how do you think that's going to affect the sample in terms of its degrading?
So Cowan asks, incredulously and understandably, did he just say that the culture medium also contain fluids and tissues that are themselves rich sources of genetic material?
The genetic cocktail or medium is inoculated onto tissue and cells from rhesus monkey kidney tissue.
This is where the importance of streptomycin comes in and currently other antimicrobials and drugs that are poisonous to kidneys and used in all modern viral cultures.
So, they deny the sample where they claim there's a virus in there.
Of nutrition.
They put antibiotics and other guns in there and all that mix.
And they put in antibiotics that are damaging to kidney cells.
And what do they use as the medium?
Monkey kidney cells.
So how does anyone think that's going to work out?
So Cowan asks, how are you ever going to know from this witch's brew where any genetic material comes from as we now have five different sources of rich genetic material in our mix?
Remember, he says, that all genetic material, whether from monkey kidney tissues, bovine serum, milk, etc., is made from the exact same components.
The same central question returns.
How are you possibly going to know that it was the virus that killed the kidney tissue?
Not the toxic antibiotic and starvation rations on which you are growing the tissue and John Enders who started all this answered that question himself you can't Quote from Enders A second agent was obtained from an un-inoculated culture of monkey kidney cells.
The psychopathic changes, death of the cells, it induced in the unstained preparations could not be distinguished with confidence from the viruses isolated from measles.
Alleged isolated from measles, not really.
The death of the cells, these psychopathic, cytopathic changes, happened in exactly the same manner whether the kidney tissue was inoculated with, as Cowan calls it, snot from someone with measles, And he says this is evidence that the destruction of the tissue, the very proof, they claim, of viral causation of illness,
was not caused by anything in the snot because they saw the same destructive effect when the snot was not even used.
The cytopathic cell-killing changes come from the process of the culture itself and not from any virus in any snot, period, he says.
And then you have the German former virologist, he stopped being a virologist when he saw what a scam this was, called Stefan Lanker.
And what he's done is Do this process with what is claimed to be disease material with a virus and then watch the degradation and the dying off of the cells in the sample.
What he then did with an independent laboratory Was go through exactly the same process that I've just described.
But with healthy material, not even claimed to have any virus or anything else.
And what do you think happened?
The cells died and degraded in exactly the same way as they did with what was claimed to have.
Have a virus in it.
In other words, the cells that are claimed in this process to have degraded because it's the virus causing it, Are actually degraded by the very process they are using, nothing to do with a virus or anything else.
And this is the way they have claimed that every one of these viruses actually exists and causes anything, including this one, this COVID nonsense.
But apparently we shouldn't be pursuing this What utter claptrap!
And then, the only place or only way that you can see what they call a viral particle, actually a particle, is through an electron microscope.
It's the only thing powerful enough because they're so tiny.
That's why the masks are useless even if there was a virus.
And let's have a look at this.
Same theme. There's another video on davidite.com with this one and the Kaufman one, which is looking at the process to prepare something to be looked at under an electron microscope.
What they do is they add to the sample uranium and lead, formaldehyde they embalm dead bodies with, Which damages genetic material.
Paraffin or kerosene.
And then they look through the electron microscope and somehow expect to get some idea of what's going on inside a living body that contains none of those things.
How can you take something like that so contaminated, so dogmatically this is how it is, seriously?
The whole thing's a farce!
And I find it really interesting that the so-called father of modern virology, where all this stuff came out of, basically, was called Thomas Milton Rivers, the director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research from the 1930s.
It's now called the Rockefeller University.
So he was working for the Rockefeller family for a very long time.
The same Rockefeller family that was behind the creation of Big Pharma and the drug corporations and founded and created the World Health Organization, which has driven the Covid narrative, a World Health Organization now run By Bill Gates, who is a very long time, the whole family is, associate of the Rockefeller family.
And we're supposed to just believe this and not pursue it.
So, let's go through a series of whys.
Why, if there is a real infectious agent...
They call a virus.
Why do they need to test for it with a test that's not testing for it, the PCR test?
Why would they have to scam the test to produce alleged cases that aren't cases if there was a real infectious agent?
The infectious agent would just do its bidding.
We were told it was a deadly virus.
You have to test for a deadly virus?
Isn't it obvious? So, this is what it says on the PCR tests sent out by the Roche pharmaceutical company.
Quote, Not intended for use as an aid in the diagnostic coronavirus infection, for research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.
This is the test, ladies and gentlemen, that has produced virtually all the alleged COVID cases worldwide.
that has turned vast tracts of this world fascist.
This is what he said.
The PCR test material sent out by a company called Creative Diagnostics.
For research purposes only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.
Which is exactly what the creator of the PCR test, Kerry Mullis, said.
It cannot detect infectious disease.
Now, if you have a real pathogen, why do you have to scam the cases with a fake test that you know is fake?
And on the basis of this, So many people have died of undiagnosed disease during lockdown.
People are dying and being destroyed in terms of their health by having a fake vaccine.
It's not even a vaccine.
In response to a virus never shown to exist.
And cases confirmed by a test that's not testing for it.
Why do people think that those who test positive with a PCR test are this other crap?
Have no symptoms.
Deadly virus, no symptoms there.
Why? Because there's nothing wrong with them.
This is why the PCR test has produced positives for COVID from samples of a pawpaw fruit, a goat.
a puddle, cola.
And then you have the lateral flow test.
They're bringing in more and more.
These antibody tests They're testing for antibodies.
Yeah, what antibodies? These antibodies that they are testing for are completely nonspecific.
So, it could be anything that's generating the antibodies.
At least 60 other conditions produced antibodies that were alleged to be HIVs.
At least 60 other conditions.
This is why the lateral flow test is absolutely useless.
Now, if you have no virus, how can you have variants of it?
How is that possible?
Again, Kaufman in his video explains what these alleged variants really are.
Another why.
If you have a real pathogen, a real deadly virus, why do you have to introduce this insane policy That if you test positive with a test not testing for the virus and die of any other cause, gunshot wounds, falling down the stairs, hit by a bus, motorcycle accident, within 28 days, then COVID-19 goes on your death certificate.
If you had a real pathogen, a real virus, You would not have to do that.
The infectious agent would just do its job, just do its thing.
A deadly virus would kill people.
So why do you have to scan the death certificates to make it seem as if people are dying of COVID-19 when they're not?
I quote a doctor in one of my books, an NHS doctor.
Who said from around March 2020, all the other doctors he knew were putting COVID-19 on death certificates, no matter what they died of.
So you have, you know, the media come out.
Oh, we've reached this figure now of deaths.
No, you haven't.
It's all a scam.
It's been a scam from the start.
But we mustn't pursue it.
So you have this differential, which they had to make eventually.
Between dying from Covid and dying with Covid, but it doesn't matter because whether it's from or within their ludicrous bloody narrative They all go together on the death numbers and the death numbers and the number of cases have justified the fascism Why, if you have a real pathogen and deadly virus, do you have to give, like American hospitals, big financial incentives from the start of this to diagnose the same symptoms as COVID-19 and not something else like pneumonia?
$4,600 for diagnosing regular pneumonia, $13,000 for diagnosing the same symptoms with COVID-19 pneumonia, and $39,000 for putting a COVID-diagnosed patient on a ventilator.
That would almost certainly kill them.
If you have a real virus, why do you have to do that?
Another why. Why, in the spring of 2020, did the British government, with its health secretary, Matt Hancock, order fantastic amounts of an end-of-life drug called midazolam, and then, provable by the documentation, use it in unprecedented amounts To kill thousands of old people in care homes.
And they called this the first wave of COVID. Watch the iconic documentary, A Good Death?, which exposes all this.
So what they were doing was putting do not resuscitate orders on old people and the disabled, and then putting them on an end-of-life protocol, including midazolam and morphine, in amounts that would kill them and did.
And what is one of the accepted consequences of Midazolam.
Respiratory distress is what it causes.
So, they were giving the midazolam.
Do not resuscitate.
So, when they went, they went.
They got respiratory distress from the midazolam.
And they died.
And COVID-19 died.
Went on the death certificate.
Oh, look!
The first wave of COVID! Why would you have to do that to manufacture a first wave if you had a real pathogen?
In America and elsewhere, The first wave was caused by a drug called remdesivir.
Foisted upon the medical profession for the treatment of, quote, COVID. They test positive with a test, not testing for it.
By Fauci.
This psychopathic mass, mass, mass murderer.
Over decades.
What does remdesivir do?
We've got COVID-19 and Fauci says we've got to give them remdesivir.
Okay, so what does remdesivir do?
As Fauci well knew, because the studies had been done.
It causes organ failure, particularly kidney failure, which leads to the abdominal cavity filling up with water and the lungs filling up with water.
And guess what happened next?
The people died.
And what went on the death certificate?
COVID-19. Oh, look!
the first wave in America. Then why have the overwhelming majority of people who
died of COVID had one, two, three, four, five or more what they call comorbidities?
reasons to die?
Why? Because COVID-19 is the redesignation of people dying from other conditions and called COVID-19.
This is the Italian authorities.
Do you remember that? Just after the Chinese start of this, the first Western country that had a COVID crisis was Italy, particularly Northern Italy.
And You saw all those pictures.
Oh, catastrophic scenes in hospitals.
People dying. We're overwhelmed.
Okay. What did that do?
It terrified the rest of the West into compliance with lockdowns that followed soon afterwards.
That's how the Italians dealt with them.
And now look what's happening in Italy.
It's fascist, full-blown.
But this is what they said once that happened.
That propaganda card had been played in Italy.
Professor Walter Ricciardi, scientific advisor to the Italian Minister of Health, said after the Lombardi hysteria had done its job, that COVID death rates were due to Italy having the second oldest population in the world and to how hospitals record deaths.
Quote... The way in which we code deaths in our country is very dangerous, dangerous as well, but it's very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.
On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12% of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88% of patients who have died have at least one pre- or co-morbidity, many had two or three.
But how do they know that that 12% was COVID-19 when it's diagnosed by a test not testing for it?
And now even the authorities are confirming and admitting themselves that when they say there's all these COVID patients in hospital, actually the majority of them went into hospital with other things like broken legs and heart problems, cancer, whatever. And then they give them a test when they're in there with a test not testing for the virus and they test positive.
Now they go on The data as someone in hospital with COVID. Why do you have to do all these things, all these scams, all this data manipulation and test manipulation and death certificate manipulation if you have a pathogen?
A real pathogen.
It would do its job.
You just leave it to it.
Why so many old people died of COVID-19?
And until the fake vaccine was rolled out, virtually no young people.
Because old people die.
They have lots of disease.
You can redesignate COVID-19.
Whereas young people don't die in anything like those numbers, a tiny fraction of those numbers.
So your redesignation potential with younger people is a fraction of what it is with old people.
Old people, it's a doddle.
And so they're all dying of COVID-19 when they're dying from other things.
Many of them, midazolam, remdesivir.
And now they're playing out this fake Lethal to so many people, fake vaccine.
And now they're having more young people die, which they can redesignate COVID-19.
To hide what's really causing it.
Why did flu disappear worldwide after COVID arrived?
What did they say COVID symptoms were, flu-like?
What are flu symptoms, flu-like?
And flu disappeared?
We have idiot journalists saying, oh yeah, it's because people were wearing masks and social distancing.
So why didn't that stop the COVID then?
Gee, man.
Why? If we had a real pathogen, did excess deaths in 2020 not reflect that?
Why did funeral directors say that during the height of the so-called pandemic, the number of people passing through their funeral parlours never increased?
But that when they started rolling out the fake vaccine, the end of 2020 into 2021, as one said, I've never seen anything like it in terms of numbers.
Who were dying. We now had an insurance company come out and say deaths in America have increased by 40% in this very period of the vaccine rollout.
fake vaccine rollout.
Why? Is any of this manipulation done and
why are these figures not reflected what we're told to believe
if there is a real pathogen?
pathogen.
Then there's the Wuhan lab story, which a lot of the alternative media have bought, as well as the parts of the mainstream, that this virus was released either by accident or on purpose.
From the Wuhan Biolab, the highest level biolab in China for this sort of thing.
And we're told that Fauci's organization in America helped to fund the so-called gain of function of this virus so it could be passed from animals to humans and stuff.
Well, First of all, if you were the Chinese authorities and you wanted to create a virus to foist upon the world for your own reasons, why would you involve financial input from Voucher's department?
You'd fund it yourself for a start.
And then you've got complete control of it and complete anonymity.
You've got no paper trail back to Fauci's department.
And if you look at these two alternatives, it was released from the Wuhan lab by accident and it was released from the Wuhan lab on purpose.
Well, a couple of things.
First of all, the evidence that this COVID hoax was prepared for and planned for from way back to be played out now is overwhelming.
So if you take the it was done by accident scenario, These people organized and orchestrated this entire scam, but they forgot one thing.
They forgot the freaking virus.
So they're sitting around a table saying, oh my God, we forgot the virus.
So we better just sit here and hope that someone's going to release it by accident.
Oh, look, they just have.
Oh, what a piece of luck.
What a nonsense. And then you have the, it was released on purpose.
Okay, so you're creating a pathogen to impact the world.
Yeah, okay. So, where are you going to release it?
Well, we thought we'd release it down the street from the lab.
In Wuhan! Though you don't think that other people are going to actually make that connection.
And you don't think they're going to make that connection to Fauci because of this paper trail.
It's insane!
And, you know, I've used a phrase over the years, design and manipulation, which, you know, I think people in the alternative media might be careful about sometimes.
I'm not saying it's the case here.
It's up to them. But designer manipulation, what do I mean?
It means that you put out a fake narrative that you know most people are actually going to buy.
But you know that a certain number are not going to buy it.
They're going to question it.
They're going to investigate it.
They're looking for a conspiracy.
So how do you deal with them?
Well, you give them a conspiracy, but just the wrong bloody conspiracy, and you throw them a bone in effect, and you let them get on with it.
Well, all the time, the real conspiracy is missed.
What is that? There is no virus.
There never has been.
And, you know, you can look at all the detail, and all Fauci this, Fauci that, and this gain of function.
It comes back to this. Let's keep it simple.
Where's the bloody virus?
Where is it? Why is all this stuff this I've just been describing had to go on to give the illusion that there's a virus if there is one?
See the common theme Between whether you believe it was natural, whether you believe it was released by accident, or whether you believe it was released on purpose, the common theme of all three is there is a virus.
And if there's a virus, there is something to deal with.
Discuss how, but there's something to deal with.
Once you realize there is no virus, there never has been a bloody virus, the whole house of cards comes down.
All of it. Because nothing at all in response to a virus that doesn't exist is justified.
Masks, social distancing, lockdown, this, that, what, the other.
Once you realize there is no virus, the house of cards comes down.
and for the cult behind this, the game is bloody over.
Which brings me back to this this final comment in the McCulloch article.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Either way, I believe it's scientifically accurate to claim that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, genetically sequenced, and that it exists as a pathogenic entity.
Nope. But this one.
Getting too far into the weeds of theories that refute the existence of viruses altogether will only slow down and hamper the truth movement rather than aid it along.
I would strongly discourage anyone from engaging in this highly unproductive narrative.
Unproductive? What?
Have you been listening for the last goodness knows how long?
The cult has to make you believe in a virus because everything else comes from that.
Bye.
Sorry, you psychopaths.
No can do.
If you want to see what's happening in...
Or what's planned to happen in the West tomorrow, then look at China today, including this story.
Chinese scientists create first AI prosecutor that will decide people's fate.
The coronavirus pandemic started in China.
...Oxygen, medical supplies and physical threats have been hampered...
...One of the five vaccines envisioned...
Stage one, you create a problem.
It could be a manufactured virus.
You want a reaction and you want them to either say, do something, or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done.
So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population.
They want to reduce the numbers.
▲
Export Selection