All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 12, 2021 - David Icke
44:06
Right Now - Gareth Icke Talks To Cornell University Professor David Collum & Pete Stone Of The Sover
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
On the show this week, Stuart Wilkie gives us an update on the drug midazolam and why he feels it should be banned.
Iconic filmmakers Gabriel McCartney and Jackie Devoy join us in the Right Now studio to talk about the documentary they're making about midazolam.
Venla, a nurse from Australia, tells us about the severe reaction she's seen to the...
And our Australian correspondent Naomi Cook gives us an update on Life Down Under.
David Collum, an American professor of chemistry, tells us what his life has been like as a scientist who disagrees with the virus narrative.
And Pete Stone talks to us about the Sovereign Project, an organisation that's been set up to empower people through
common law.
MUSIC MUSIC
Hello and welcome to Right Now.
The Covid narrative, and particularly the case for vaccine passports in the UK, is continuing to fall apart.
And what happens when a narrative begins to slip is the managers of that narrative all jump to its defence, like a loyal wife to a cheating politician.
The bigger the lies, the bigger the desperation, and this week we've had some whoppers.
The NHS now have multiple entries in the Didn't Happen of the Year awards.
We've had a professor from Independent Sage tweeting about children dying of COVID, and when corrected by several doctors and other professors using ONS data, she just ignored it and kept the original tweet live to fool others.
She blocked me when I asked her why she was lying.
We had a doctor on talk radio telling us that there are 2,000 COVID patients in intensive care and 20% of them have been unvaccinated pregnant women.
He was lying. But the winner this week was the CEO of the NHS, Amanda Pritchard.
She said that there's 14 times more people in hospital with COVID now than the same time last year.
She was lying. I assume then that her monumental lie being revealed, she was held to account.
No, according to the NHS, she just misspoke.
It's annoying when that happens.
Hey mate, what was the derby score?
Oh we won 8-0. Oh really?
Because Sky Sports News said you lost 1-0.
Yeah sorry, I misspoke.
Misspoke, misspoke, pants up in smoke.
I think the narrative also is about to take another blow soon.
Matt Hancock in a swimming hat, Sajid Javid, is going to be given 60,000 NHS workers until April to get jabbed, or they're fired, from hero to zero wages.
I wonder if they'll get clapped as they walk into the job centre.
What incentive then remains for the 60,000 NHS workers to remain silent?
With what they've witnessed over the last two years, whether it be midazolam, first wave, empty hospitals, vaccine injuries, their reason for protecting the golden calf has now been withdrawn.
We're about to find ourselves tens of thousands of whistleblowers and here at right now, we'll welcome every single one of them because enough is enough.
One of the mantras of the whole pandemic has been trust the science.
Just like with climate change, those three words have become the default setting for those that are either too lazy or too frightened to think outside the rona box.
It's easier that way, right?
Why bother looking at alternative information when the science will do all the thinking for you?
Well, the science and scientists, of course, that the government allows you to hear.
Well, for many that don't trust the science, and there's scientists among them, the next guest is one of them.
David Collum is a professor of organic chemistry at Cornell University, one of the most prestigious universities in America.
He's openly challenged the official virus narrative on social media and has been heavily criticised for his views.
He joins us now. David, thank you very much for coming on.
You're a professor of organic chemistry and have had a long and successful career as a scientist.
Why didn't you trust the official science surrounding the virus?
Well, it's pretty straightforward.
Once you start detecting the lies, then all of a sudden you stop trusting the science.
So at first I trusted it.
And I have a natural instinct to doubt.
So I'm in a complex area of chemistry that turned out everything was not quite right.
And I've repaired a lot of damage over the 40 years I've been doing chemistry.
But So it starts out, the disease shows up, they want to flatten the curve, and next thing you know, they're changing their story, and the first couple of changes looked like noble lies, where they were saying, well, you know, don't mask up, which was code for, we need the masks for the medical people.
I was okay with that, and then it just got worse and worse and worse, and pretty soon it became clear that Fauci couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it.
That everything became a narrative, which is We're in the age of narratives now, so that all of a sudden made sense.
And as you've noticed, I doubt everything.
So I'm a climate change denier.
I did my homework on it and concluded it was a mess.
And again, so any scientific topic that becomes politicized ceases to be science.
I agree completely.
What was it that made you go public with it?
Was it because you could see basically just where this was heading and it's like, I can't be silent on this?
Well, I never did keep silence.
As my opinion emerged, I spewed it out there.
I don't stay in the shadows and then leap out.
I just walk around and say what I'm thinking.
I just started formulating opinions and started expressing them.
If you want to get an answer to something, just put out something on Twitter and watch and see what people say about it.
And if it's a bad idea, you'll quickly be told why.
And a lot of the narratives just didn't hold up.
No. Do you find it funny?
Because this is something that I kind of am confused by.
So most people, I think, were like yourself.
In the first couple of weeks, it was a kind of like, okay, I don't really understand what's happening.
So I'm going to kind of just sort of look around.
Okay, they're going to flatten the curve and X, Y, and Z. And then, you know, we're looking, we're nearly two years.
We're pushing two years now.
And there's still people that...
Completely by the narrative, even though it's got so many holes in it, you know, it's like mouse cheese.
Is there a reason why you think people can't see it?
Yeah, I also have a degree in biology, and I think that, although I absolutely know biology at this point, it's 45 years old.
I think the instincts that I developed studying genetics are still with me.
I love anthropology and evolutionary biology.
I think people are tribal, and so I think people have a terrible time once they accept a narrative to undo it.
They have trouble retracting their thinking.
I think if you've been vaccinated, The natural instinct is to say, well, I could have been duped, right?
That requires you facing a tough reality.
The other thing is that, and I've written about this, too.
I've written about all these subjects.
Well, something bugs me. I write about it.
We used to have as our guiding light in society and religion, and I'm kind of a card-carrying atheist, you know, pro-choice guy, But over the years, I've evolved this awareness of the structural importance of religion and how it guided societies that otherwise would have been in chaos.
So I think as we pushed religion sort of off to the perimeters, we replaced it with political causes.
So instead of going to church and saying, you know, don't hurt your neighbor, don't covet his wife, blah, blah, blah.
Now it's, you know, my team supports climate change.
My team hates Trump.
My team hates Biden.
And so we are a bunch of holy rollers.
We just roll to a different tune.
Yeah, I can't disagree with that at all.
In fact, I know someone who's such a despiser of Trump, but is anti-mask, but they wore a mask throughout because they didn't want to be perceived to be pro-Trump.
So they actually covered their face in shops so people didn't think they were a Trump supporter.
And you're just like, how tribal can you get that you would do something like that to yourself?
It seems strange to me.
What did Cornell University make of it when you spoke out about this?
Well, Cornell's pretty good.
Cornell has openly stated support for free speech.
I have a generally good relationship with the administration, having served in a number of reasonably In leadership roles.
I've done all sorts of things.
I've been department chair.
I've coached two sports, two collegiate sports.
I've advised various clubs.
I've done all sorts of things that Cornell knows about.
My program's been successful for 40 years and so they have nothing to complain about.
I think the administration is generally good and the one problem I had with them was the time I defended the police and got my butt canceled.
It was a pretty savage attack, in my opinion.
I'm not a wimp, but it was pretty overwhelming still.
There are people who have been canceled who have committed suicide.
It really is overwhelming.
Cornell came out and denounced my support of the police without actually stating it.
And you could say, well, why would they do that?
Well, kind of put out the fire.
And the people got their scalp and they moved on.
And so in some sense, the denouncing was done by people who were actually friends of mine, right?
I mean, I've known the provost since the day he got here.
So besides that one problem that was a big problem for Cornell, I've had no trouble with it.
Do your colleagues or any of your colleagues share the same views about the kind of Covid narrative of the fact that something's not right?
I don't know for sure.
I do know that some are not thinking about it.
I do have biochem colleagues out there who are doubting it.
I think they're a little less prone to go down rabbit holes than I am.
I've reached the point now where anything that's not impossible is ponderable.
It's that simple.
And I've got colleagues who I think Oh, I think they wish I'd shut up.
That's possible. And I'm not saying that to be critical of them.
I think their life would be simpler if I just stayed within the confined space of chemistry.
Yeah. I mean, I know the answer to this question, but I'm going to ask it anyway.
Is there any point where you've thought, I should just keep my mouth shut?
Absolutely. I can't.
It's only a theoretical idea, but I talk to my brother a lot about this.
I write about human folly, and the narratives of later, beyond human folly, they're getting pretty dark.
And I look at the COVID narrative, and it's a very dark narrative, and I look at how Australia's handling it like a bunch of Nazis.
And I go, there's something going on here that's way darker than just stupid people doing stupid things.
And then at some point I say, okay, are you having an effect?
Is it worth the emotional commitment to do this?
And I don't have a mechanism to turn it off, probably.
But there are days that are tough.
I've done podcasts where the podcaster caught me on a tough day.
Right. And I go right into that darkness sometimes.
And the podcaster's going, whoa, get this guy some Prozac.
And I do a lot of podcasts.
This week is an unbelievable week for podcasts for me.
I'm just juggling my calendar this week.
So I think it's because I speak out.
I think the podcasters like the fact that there might be a crash on Curve 5, right?
Boom. There he goes.
Well, we appreciate you taking the time to talk to us, obviously, because you're that busy.
I think the other thing as well, because you, you know, it's fine someone on social media, you know, some guy that works down the shop, coming out and saying, this is what I think.
But I think when people, you know, like yourself coming out of somewhere like Cornell speak out, that kind of, it almost excites people because it's like, yes, you know, there's someone within that establishment that's on our side.
As a scientist, what is your take on the virus narrative?
Because you've mentioned there that you think it's going down a dark path, and I 100% agree with that.
What is your feeling now after nearly two years of what this is all about?
Well, if I had to write a bulleted list, I would say that the virus is worse than a flu.
I would say that it's killing people who are pretty easily killed for the most part.
I would say that the lockdown made sense at the time, but became a very bad decision as it became protracted.
We haven't begun to pay the price for it.
We're seeing the price for it.
I think it's now become a vehicle by which the state is enforcing its power over the populace.
That's the dark part.
The vaccine story is cluttered with Awful, awful subplots, where statistically, we don't have good data on anything.
And my opinion is founded on anecdotal data by definition because the stuff that I would really like to know about, they're being very careful about not studying.
And so, for example, Ivermectin is a subplot.
I am confident, I might not be correct, but I'm confident, That ivermectin would have saved many lives if we'd gotten it out there fast.
And the U.S. authorities say, well, there's no data.
And I go, you've spent trillions of dollars.
You forgot to collect that data.
How is that possible? The answer is because it's a vaccine story.
And if ivermectin worked, the vaccine couldn't have been released.
It's that simple.
And so the vaccine story meant that ivermectin HCQ had to be squashed.
But now they're letting Merck and Pfizer bring drugs to market.
That I don't think are probably any better than Ivermectin, but they're going to make Merck and Pfizer a lot of money.
I've consulted for all these companies in the game.
I've consulted for all the big players.
I've collaborated with Merck and Pfizer.
I think the scientists there are great, but whoever's running those companies, I just saw the CEO of Pfizer the other day say that they were going to sick the CIA and the FBI on people who are spreading misinformation about the vaccine.
That's a Nazi. He's a Nazi.
Take me to court. You don't like being called a Nazi.
Take me to court. I'll see you in discovery.
Do you think, because there's something like with the reporting of the adverse reactions, so here in the UK we've got the yellow card system, there it's VAERS, and it's kind of a bit of a mishmash, isn't it, where anyone can report anything, you can go on there yourself and say, this happened to my son or whatever.
Do you think that's done intentionally?
Because I look at lots of other reporting systems.
There's a very strong reporting system on if anything goes wrong, say, with a car or if anything goes wrong with a particular, you know, food or all these things and other drugs where there's a reporting system that's bang to rights, that data is there, categorical, take it off the market.
Whereas with the vaccine set up, with VAERS, because it is kind of so wishy-washy and anyone can add things, it can get picked apart.
It's also apparently quite hard.
So apparently it's a very frustrating site.
It can take you quite a lot of time.
So for credible individuals like doctors who are treating COVID patients, if you're in some major ER and you're treating COVID patients and they're keeling over on you for various reasons, you don't have the time to fill out the various paperwork.
I also think that they're intentionally obfuscating the vaccine problems.
I don't have a doubt at all.
I think vaccine-related deaths are being called unvaccinated COVID deaths.
There's a complete other absence of autopsies, which they should be calling out the pathologists in vast numbers.
And say, okay, okay, okay, let's get some of these vaccine-related deaths under the knife.
Let's find out why they died.
I worked for a pathologist when I was an undergrad.
And I asked him, why do you do autopsies?
He says, to find out what we got wrong.
And they're explicitly avoiding autopsies, best I can tell.
There's a German pathologist who took 40 sketchy deaths after the vaccine and did autopsies and said 40% of them showed clear pathology indicating the vaccine got them.
So try to find that in the US. Yeah, same in the UK. It's just all we hear here is safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective.
I feel like some of these people should just get it tattooed on their arm.
So what do you think that narrative is about?
I'm dark enough now that I don't think it's just money.
No, I agree.
Because Pfizer makes a ton of money on a ton of things.
I just don't know what it is.
And at this point, is it worth it?
I've got a rash on my arm right here.
I showed my wife and I said, is that poison ivy?
She said, no. She said, the fact it's in the joint of the arm makes it a little more sort of looks like some sort of internal thing.
I'm sort of going, okay, am I starting to see some rash that's emerging from the Pfizer vaccine from six months ago?
I don't know, right? It's turning me into a hypochondriac.
But what I do know is there's no authority who's going to tell me, oh, by the way, this is what you should look for because this can happen.
No, and that will cost lives going forward.
Well, I'm hoping not mine.
No, hopefully not yours.
No, no, no. But I'm pretty fatalistic about it.
I say, look, if they've somehow destroyed us all, right?
I was at a Zoom call with one of the big anti-vaxxers two days ago.
One of the guys who, you know, if you were to say, show me 10 prominent anti-vaxxers, this is one of them.
This guy named Geert van den Bosch.
And I was listening to his case, and I find him to be...
Probably the least credible of the anti-vaxxers, actually.
But I was trying to get my brain around.
He certainly thinks that the vaccine campaign is going to lead to wholesale death.
And I said, well, could you tell me how I'm going to die here?
If it does, I don't want to be walking around this place.
Take me with you, because I don't look good in a purple mohawk.
I don't want to have to do a road warrior existence.
It's just going to stink.
And so it's like if we have a thermonuclear war, I want to be right under the first bomber.
Maybe the second. Maybe the second.
Maybe I want to see something.
But it's a bad world if this vaccine goes bad.
Yeah. No, I agree completely.
And by the way, the line, my transition to full-blown Crazy guy was when the vaccine got released in the middle of December in the U.S. and within a week they were telling pregnant women to get it.
Yeah. And I said, there's a pathology there that just doesn't make sense at all.
We haven't told pregnant women to take anything experimental since thalidomide when we gave birth to a generation of flippers, kids with flippers.
So we know pregnant women are shown to be okay by mistake.
When you have a drug that someone took and you get pregnant, you go, oh my God, I took this.
And then the kid comes out okay and you go, okay, we dodged that bullet, right?
And then you find out over time, Pregnant women are not being hurt.
But they don't do clinical trials on pregnant soccer moms.
And all of a sudden, FDA comes out and says, or the CDC, one of the two, I can't remember.
And I checked it. It was not fake.
Came out and says, there's no data yet, but there's no reason why pregnant women shouldn't take it.
And I go, you're out of your mind. You're completely and utterly out of your mind.
And then they said the most pathological part of the whole tweet Was you could ask your doctor, but there's no reason to.
The reason they said that is because no doctor would ever sign off on that.
Unless they've already joined the hive, and they're in that tribal moment.
They're just idiots. If you're a doctor, you're an obstetrician, and in January of 2021, You told your patients to get vaccinated.
I think you're nuts.
I think you're certifiably nuts.
If you laid it out and said, look, COVID can hurt the fetus.
The vaccine can hurt the fetus.
You got to make a call on this.
Here's my opinion. That's not nuts.
But if you just wholesale...
October was the first month in which deliveries from women who got the vaccine And got pregnant contemporaneously delivered.
So we don't yet know.
We presumably might have some hint that we're getting kids born with four eyes or something like that, which seems unlikely.
I think we'd be hearing about it.
But we don't know if they're developmentally whacked out.
We don't know anything. And there's rumors of stillbirths and miscarriages that are out of whack.
A study came out of the UK that said everything's fine and then social media tore it apart and said, by the way, here's how they jiggered the numbers.
So, that's psychotic.
That's psychopathy.
That means there's That means the model that we're working with is not the right model.
We're thinking in terms of rational individuals, and that's not what we should be thinking of it as.
No. Yes, I'm now anti-vax.
I'm anti-vax because I don't trust them, period.
I think they're not worthy of any trust.
No, they're not at all.
I think the world is run by some very nefarious people at the moment.
Thank you very much for taking the time to talk to us, because I know, as you mentioned, obviously you're busy, and you're probably jumping on another podcast now, so thank you very much.
I'd love to speak to you again in the future, if you'd be willing.
Yeah, sure. Magic.
Thank you. Here at Right Now, we think standing in your own power and not consenting to the madness around us is a definite solution for the situation we're currently in.
And we're not the only ones. Peter Stone has set up the organisation The Sovereign Project.
Its aim is to help people reclaim their personal power and live freely in a world obsessed with control.
It provides information, resources and workshops based around common law and the aim is to build a global community of people working towards personal and collective freedom.
Pete, welcome to the show. Why did you set up The Sovereign Project?
Oh, wow. Well, I've been working on it for some time.
I've been researching government propaganda for, well, getting on for 30 years now, and I really got into it in the last 10.
I knew what was coming in the year 2020.
I was saying in 2017, look, the government's setting up for a lockdown.
Everyone thought I was a crazy person.
I was also warning people about the financial reset that was coming in around 2025 and the collapse of the fiat system.
So I was trying to put the sovereign project together to teach people how they could protect themselves.
But then 2020 happened, the lockdowns happened, which I predicted, and then I thought I've got to get things done because I was seeing millions of people suffering and panicking and living in fear.
And I know how the system works.
And I'm going, why are you living in fear?
If you know how the system works, you will not be living in fear and you'll be able to protect yourself.
And it's relatively easy.
That's the main mission, if you like, behind the Sovereign Project.
And I've got a good team behind me now.
They're all woken up.
There's two levels of waking up, by the way.
One level of waking up is understanding what the government is trying to do.
The next level of waking up is realizing the government doesn't even exist.
Now, when you get into that zone, that's when you'll start to wake up and you will not live in fear anymore because you'll realize that the government is a legal fiction.
When you get rid of that legal fiction, all you have is people And now you know who is behind all of this.
You pull back the curtain. It's like the last scene of The Wizard of Oz, right?
I don't care about the booming voice and the hologram and the flames.
Not interested. That's the government.
That's the legal fiction. Offer declined.
I pull back the curtain and go, who's pulling the levers?
What is the Sovereign Project?
How does it work as an organisation?
Well, it's reaching out to people who are already sovereign, okay?
These are people who have the ability to govern themselves, live their own lives, control their own lives, and they are responsible for themselves.
These are the people who have already woken up and stepped out of the system in their mindset.
So I'm reaching out to those people.
I'm also reaching out to people who want to be free.
If you no longer want to be a slave, and by the way, it's all about the mindset.
Most people out there are being brainwashed to be a slave.
They live in the plebtorial system.
So I explain how the plebtorial system works.
I explain where your brainwashing, how the brainwashing controls you.
We get rid of the brainwashing.
You become free. Then we teach you how to protect yourself using what I like to call equity law.
I know common law is like a general term.
There's a lot of it going about at the moment.
There's people out there going, I want to get some of this common law.
Well, common law is a general term.
It depends who you're talking to, and it depends on what that term means.
There's many different layers of law.
So we explain how these all work.
We explain how the different jurisdictions work.
And we also explain that virtually all of them don't even apply to you unless you give consent.
And this is one of the weaknesses of government.
It's a legal fiction. It's a corporation.
By the way, the UK is a corporation.
Great Britain is a corporation, okay?
That's all it is. Corporation is a dead entity.
That's where the word comes from. Corpse-eration.
Corporation, okay? It doesn't exist.
Everything that the government offers, just like a corporation, is an offer.
All you've got to do, offer declined.
Thank you very much, offer declined.
And then when a person, a real living, breathing person comes after you, someone's knocking on your door, someone's pulled you over, and you're driving your car, someone's in the shop, they come after you and they try and apply legislation onto you.
I'll show you how you can go after them.
You use the notice, affidavit, lien process, and you'll end up taking their house, taking their car, and they'll leave you alone.
So basically, the Sovereign Project is that, waking people up.
You learn the different layers of law.
And then also, what we're trying to do is get people...
We try and avoid the word community, okay?
We don't use the word community.
Community comes from commune, which is the foundation of communism.
Alright, so we try and step out of that.
We like using the word tribe if you wish, but we're looking for individuals out there that are doing their own thing.
I'm talking with people already.
I'm talking with paramedics and nurses who are stepping away from the national health, realizing just how insidious that organization is, okay?
They don't want any part of it.
So they want to practice law, sorry, health.
And we're going to try and help them so they can step out and there's a different health service, if you like, for sovereigns to use.
And we're going to do this with all businesses.
If you want to become a sovereign business, you want to step out of the system, you want to go full private, you want to be left alone, no more regulations and all this nonsense that's being applied to you, no more licensing, okay?
If you want to do that, we'll help you and we'll connect you with other people who are doing the same thing globally.
We have people all over the world now.
We have members all over the world.
I'll use the term common law because, like you said, it's a generalisation.
It's a general term. Can that actually be used successfully within the current system?
Do the courts, police and public take that seriously?
Right. That is a very difficult question to ask.
Here's the thing. People have been brainwashed into thinking that something written down on a piece of paper that some politician gives is law.
It is not, okay?
It is only a policy.
And it does not apply to you unless you actually sign it.
So if a politician says, here we go, Coronavirus Act 2020, I've written it down, it's a policy.
If you take it and go, yeah, I like the idea of that.
I'm going to shut down my business.
I'll get my pen. I'll sign it.
The politician signs it.
It then becomes a contract.
That politician can then issue that contract onto you.
If your signature's not on it, it does not legally or lawfully apply to you in any way.
So, there's a lot of people out there trying to find this common law.
You know, they get into this trap that it's like, oh, I'm being forced to have a vaccine at work.
By the way, you're not being forced.
You're being tricked.
It's only an offer. We can touch on that in a bit if you wish.
We've got people out there that go, I've got to get me some of this common law.
Where can I get the book on common law?
You've been programmed to think that bits of paper given to you somehow apply to you, and then you've got to go off and get a different bit of paperwork.
I've got a different piece of paper, and then that fights this piece of paperwork.
That is not how common law works.
You won't find it.
If it's written down, it's someone else's policy.
If it's someone else's policy, it's someone else's law.
If your signature's not on it, it doesn't apply to you.
Acts, statutes, legislation, all this does not apply to you unless your signature's on it.
So, trying to answer your question in layman terms, all courts are corporate, they are private, they are administrative.
If you end up in their courts, you're in their jurisdiction.
This is the brainwashing again.
Every single person has their own court, okay?
You have your own responsibility, you have your own authority, your own courts, your own law, your own jurisdiction and your own freedom.
You've been tricked in giving all that away and believing if you step into a court, that's something to do with law.
It is not. You don't go to court.
Your court is with you all the time.
So that's what sovereign means.
Common law is within. It's in your mind and in your heart.
It's your authority.
You use your paperwork, not someone else's.
This is like constitutional law.
This is where people go wrong.
In America, they say, you ask the Americans, do you have the right to bear arms?
They say, yes. And I say, okay, where do you get this right?
And I say, it's in the Constitution.
The Constitution gives me that right.
No, it doesn't.
You already had that right.
It's inherent to you.
You already have the right to bear arms.
The Constitution is supposed to protect you from the government infringing on your rights.
Your rights are yours.
You've got to get your brain set right, your mind set right.
They're your rights. So I show you how to protect them using your paperwork, in your jurisdiction, using your courts.
You don't want to be stepping into that court.
This is where so many people go wrong.
They go into the courts thinking, okay, we're going to sue the politicians.
Well, good luck with that.
Because if you go into their courts, you've lost your status.
You're not suffering. You've lost all your rights.
You've only got privileges. You have the lowest stating.
If you are plaintiff, you're lower than low.
Because the way it works in this hierarchy, right, they put titles on themselves.
So you've got judge, magistrate, sir, lawyer, all these titles.
If you say, yes, I'm the plaintiff, you're on the bottom rung.
Right. You've already admitted defeat, basically.
Yes, you've lost.
You've lost. And also, if they ask you what your name is, like Mr.
Smith. So if you end up in their court, if you're pulled in and they say, can we have Mr.
Smith, please? They go, yes, I'm Mr.
Smith. You've lost. You've accepted the title Mister.
That's a military term.
That's in the military account.
Lowest of the low. It's like civilian.
If you accept the term civilian, you've lost.
You've got no rights, no status.
Member of the public. This is another one people don't understand.
If you accept that, member of the public.
Anything with member means membership.
Put the word ship on the end, maritime law.
It's an absolute minefield, isn't it?
You said at the beginning of that that people that are obviously being mandated to have these vaccines, that they're not, they're being tricked.
Could you elaborate on that? Because that's a big thing for a lot of our viewers.
Yes. I want everyone to understand how a mandate works, okay?
A mandate can only apply to you if you have previously agreed to the mandate in contract.
Contract comes first.
There is two documents.
So let's say the year is 2019 and your boss sits you down by name.
Not by title, his boss.
Let's give him a name. Joe Bloggs.
It's Joe Bloggs. You sit in his office and in 2019 he says, look, there might be a medical emergency.
We know it's fake. There might be a medical emergency and then we might need to mandate you to have a medical procedure.
Would you accept this contract?
So you would go, yes, okay.
He would offer the policy to you.
You sign it.
He signs it. Contract done.
He now has the contract.
2020 comes along.
He can then turn around and say, right, I am now mandating you to have this medical procedure and I can do so because I have this contract that you signed and I signed.
No one has signed a contract agreeing to any of these mandates.
That means if any living person, a man or a woman, your boss, by name, forget their title, if they try and mandate you, To have a medical procedure in any way.
They have carried out a torch which can lead to a criminal act.
You can now sue that person for everything he's got.
Okay? You step out the work contract.
Let's say you work for a company called Acme Widgets, right?
And your job is to make widgets.
As soon as your boss says, right, we're mandating you to have a medical procedure that might end your life, That original contract making widgets no longer applies, not interested, goes in the bin.
You're now stepping in my jurisdiction, right?
This is breeder contract.
You're in my jurisdiction. I make the law.
That's how it works. You're in my court.
You cannot force me to do this because I never agreed to it.
And I'm coming after you by name, so I'll go after the name of that person, the manager.
Now, he's got to take liability.
Yeah. Because I'll say, are you the one making me do this?
Are you mandating me to do this?
If he goes, no, no, no, no, I'm not.
I'm not. It's come from HR. Oh, HR? HR's a legal fiction.
HR doesn't have arms and legs.
I can't talk to HR. Who in HR is saying, I've got to have this medical procedure?
Give me a name. If that boss can't give you a name, then it's the boss's fault.
If you can't give me the name of the principal who's issued this mandate, then you're responsible.
I'm not going to go through the grievance procedure of that business.
I'm not making complaints.
I'm suing that manager personally.
I'll serve him notice. A process server will knock on his front door in the morning while he's having his cornflakes and goes, right, you've been served.
You owe 250,000.
See, that's where a lot of this is, people need to be held accountable, don't they?
Lots of people, I hear all the time they're just following orders, it's coming from above.
I mean, common law is a big thing, as you mentioned earlier, especially over the last couple of years, because people, they feel desperate and they want something that's going to be able to get them out of a situation that they're in.
We had quite a lot of people on the iconic social media asking questions, so can I put a couple to you, if that's okay?
No personal questions, though.
No, no, of course not. You know, it's two and a half thousand years history of law.
I can't remember all of it. Of course, of course.
Yeah. So the first one, would you like to go out for a drink?
No. So at Kitty Baroque asks, what is the process of reclaiming our birth name and swapping into full sovereignty, stepping into full sovereignty?
Right, okay. That's going to take a little bit of explaining.
There's different remedies. We've got to understand how it works.
There's two birth certificates.
So when you're born, your parents are tricked into signing you over into a trust.
So a live certificate of birth then goes to the Vatican.
This live certificate of birth is used to create credit, which supports the entire financial system.
If you understand how the financial system works, you'll understand why they're giving everybody this injection.
We could touch on that another time.
But anyway, What they then do, the Vatican, is they create a corporation, which is a legal fiction, which sounds like your name, but it's not your name.
You are tricked into believing that's you.
And then that is the debtor of the credit that you make.
Now, you are then tricked into paying back your own credit using this corporation.
Technically, these two certificates, the live birth certificate, or certificate of birth, is not yours, and also the other one, the corporate one, is not yours either.
It actually belongs to the Vatican.
They created it. There are people who have managed to get hold of it.
It's not easy. It's not like, oh, I'll just fill out this form, and now I'm a secure party creditor, and now I've got control of that birth certificate.
No, it doesn't work like that. It takes several years, and there's probably a handful of people on the planet that could even do it.
This is the Holy Grail. They're not going to make it easy.
So instead of trying to claim it back, the best thing to do is turn your back on it and say, it's not even mine, okay?
It's offer declined.
So the best way to do this is that there's too many people out there trying to prove things and trying to make statements.
Don't do that. The burden of proof is on the one making the claims, so don't make claims.
So the best way to do this is if you do an affidavit of status.
So you'll claim your own living, breathing status.
You'll say who you are and what your name is, whatever your status is.
That's a personal thing to you.
There's no real templates for this.
It's your choice. If you have children under the age of 16, put them on that affidavit and call them your property, okay?
There's another thing as well.
People have been tricked into thinking, don't use the word property when regarding children.
Well, if you don't use the word property, the state will claim property of your children, which is what they've done.
So put your children on your affidavit of status as property.
Anyway, you've got affidavit of status.
That is your living, breathing status.
It's an affidavit. It's the most powerful document on the planet.
There is no other more powerful document on the planet than your affidavit, okay?
Only another affidavit can rebut an affidavit.
We're at the top of the tree. You put your affidavit of status on file.
You file it with a court. You sit on it.
It's done. After 30 days, it's law.
If someone comes after you, try and apply the legal fiction onto you, which is all caps name, Billy Bob Smith, like a speeding ticket, by the way.
That's not even written in English.
It's dog Latin. So if you look at that, you go, I don't even recognise the name.
You send it back. Sorry, don't even recognise that name.
I can't even give a response.
If you get someone from the police then trying to say that's you, you go, whoa, hang on a minute.
I've got my affidavit status filed with the court.
Do you want to go up against this?
No policeman's going to do that.
They're going to go, whoa, no, no, no, no.
And they're going to drop everything. I'm simplifying.
I'm giving layman terms just because of the time.
It's a bit more complicated than that.
That's basically how you should do it.
Walk away, offer to client, create your own new status.
Of course. And people can go to your website as well to get more in-depth stuff.
So Gillian Clark says, I run a small family hair salon.
I own the business and the property.
Who has a legal right to enter my premises?
Okay, now there's a few other pieces of information I'll probably need to know.
If you've registered that business with the government, which is legal fiction, it's a corporation, you don't own it anymore.
Okay? You've given up property rights.
You only have usage rights.
So, if you have a registered business, you don't own it, and you are now liable to all legislation, everything, all the pieces of legislation, all the acts, all of it, now apply to you.
So let's say that you say, I'm now cutting that off.
I'm deregistering from the government.
I am now going private.
OK, that's a step in the right direction.
Now, none of that legislation, none of those licensing, none of that, all of it, none of it.
There's that 32 million bits of legislation or something in England.
Yeah, none of it now applies because you've gone private.
You're not linked to the government corporation.
However, if you have an open door policy, you are subject to the rights of anyone walking in.
So if I walk in, I bring all my rights with me.
So if I walk into a shop and they turn around and say, you've got to wear a mask or whatever, something like that.
I'll say, okay, you might be private, but I've walked in with all my rights.
I've accepted your contract.
And because I've got all my rights, I have the right not to wear a mask.
So there's another level to this.
If you want to go full private, that's closed door policy.
This requires a membership.
So your business will be 100% not connected to government, 100% not open door policy, membership only.
That means if anyone wants to do business with you, they have to accept membership.
So if you're a hairdresser, the best way to do it is to go full private, closed door policy.
You have on the door something like, this is private property, by appointment only.
And then you'll have private members going there.
And then you are 100% private at that point.
No one can shut you down.
No one can do anything.
You can say what you want. You can say, look, if you want to do business here, you've got to wear a pink tutu.
And you've got to accept it in the policy and go, well, yeah, okay, I'll accept.
I sign. I'm now a member.
I'll put my pink tutu on and now I'm going to have my hair cut.
So they're the three basic levels, okay?
And hopefully that's explained it.
Yeah, yeah. I mean that could work with something like a hair salon because generally there's probably not that much walk-in trade anyway.
People are making an appointment so you could have a private member's hair salon.
Yeah, well, you can also do it as you can apply for a membership there and there.
So you could be walking by.
It could be members only. You could knock on the door and say, look, I'd like to be a member.
And it could be as simple as, yeah, here's a ticket.
You are now a member. Okay, thanks for the ticket.
You walk in. So it's not like a long-winded process.
You've got to fill out paperwork.
You've got to post it in. It could be that simple.
Exactly, yeah. I mean, that works with a gym or something.
You walk into a gym, you have to sign a parkour before you train and stuff.
So yeah, it wouldn't be that difficult.
No, not at all. That's a very kind of doable thing.
Thank you very much for joining us.
What's the website so people viewing this can go and...
Sure, it's thesovereignproject.live.
Now, if you want to get in contact, there's a couple of emails on there.
So if you want to do some collaboration, if you want to join us, then if you'd like to contact thesovereignteam at protonmail.com.
We are looking for graphic designers and leaflet designers.
So anybody who is willing to give up a bit of their time and volunteer a little bit of help, we much appreciate it.
So if you could do that, that'd be great.
But yeah, the website, thesovereignproject.live.
▲
Export Selection