All Episodes
Previous Next
July 30, 2021 - David Icke
50:20
Hellooooo.... There IS No 'Virus' - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ you
Hello and welcome to this week's David Ike.Connect video cast.
Well, I've been rather controversial over the years and one of the most controversial things that I've said, certainly in recent times, is there is no virus.
No, there is no SARS-CoV-2 and therefore there can't be any COVID-19.
And The swathes of the alternative media, and I understand why, have not been able to encompass that fact and the scale of the deceit involved.
But, you know, what did the Nazis say?
The bigger the lie, the more we'll believe it.
Because people, they accept.
Well, they used to.
Some still do. Their governments lie to them and authorities lie to them.
But they go, they wouldn't like that much.
What are you saying? That the last year and a half has been a total fraud, fake, and that we were told to be frightened of something that doesn't exist?
Are you saying that? Yeah, exactly what I'm saying.
Well, what about all the cases?
All the cases, yeah.
But where do the cases come from?
Well, test positive with a test, yes.
A test that's not testing for a virus, not testing for an infectious disease.
Its inventor, Kerry Mullis, made that very clear, that it can't tell you if you're sick.
All he said it does is make lots of somethings out of something.
In other words, it takes a minute piece of genetic material and makes lots of copies of it.
Makes lots of somethings out of something.
That's it. And this test, which is not testing for a virus or an infectious disease, has been used to produce all the alleged cases.
Well, these people dying.
There are people dying.
There's always people dying. And I'm not saying people aren't dying.
My question is, what's off?
So you have a situation where if you test positive with a test not testing for the virus and they die of any other cause within 28 days, more, sometimes, then COVID-19 goes under a death certificate.
You are hit by a bus.
So, what do you think the cause of death is?
Well, I suppose it's zipped by a bus.
Oh, no, but they tested positive with the test not testing for the virus less than 28 days ago.
So, when the bus hit him, he died of COVID-19.
Then you've got the coroner in America who pointed out that COVID-19 has gone on the death certificates of people who died from gunshot wounds in the chest.
So I'm not saying people aren't dying.
I'm saying, what of? And clearly, it's not of COVID-19 if you are going to fake the death certificates on such a bizarre...
What has this ever happened before?
An outrageous scale.
But what happens?
It always happens. You notice an example of this.
When, I don't know, something happens in the world, an event...
And the news media will say, the government says, this is what happened.
But very soon after those opening stories, it becomes, this is what happened.
No, the government says, the government claims, and maybe, you know, governments lie.
No, this is what happened.
So, official story of 9-11.
The government say, this is what happened.
And then very quickly, this is what happened.
And it's been, this is what happened ever since.
And so this has happened with the fake tests and the fake death certificates.
Okay, yeah, okay, the test is not tested with the virus, although most people don't even know that.
Of course they don't. Most doctors don't know that.
Extraordinary, but true. Politicians, most of them don't know that.
Some of the least informed people in the world, politicians.
But Then you have the fake death certificates.
Now doctors know that the death has been faked but they keep their mouths shut most of them because it's it's bad for the career if they don't and so a test not testing for the virus then becomes they tested positive therefore they had this SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 and they died within 28 days of a positive test with a test not testing with the virus so therefore This is the number of deaths from COVID-19.
And this then becomes accepted wisdom.
This is how it is. And even though flu disappears, flu with flu-like symptoms, disappears in the COVID era.
I'm not going to bring it back soon, though.
But in this whole period, flu's disappeared.
Why? Because it's been redesignated COVID-19, which has flu-like symptoms.
And this is what has produced the cases.
Fake cases, no cases.
All these people have got, have had COVID. No, they haven't.
No, they haven't. And all these people have died.
No, they haven't. No.
It's a scam. Look at it.
And then you get the fact that this SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated in and of itself to show A, it exists and B, it causes anything.
If people realised how they decide that a virus, lots to know about that in general, But if people knew how a virus was claimed to be causing a disease, if they've got a brain cell on active duty, they'd hold their head in despair.
I'm going to explain how SARS-CoV-2 was claimed to exist.
And it goes back to the method of a guy called John Enders back in the 1950s.
Who came up with this method of showing that a virus causes disease.
And I kid you not, this is how it works.
You take a piece of genetic material, you claim that there's a virus in there, and it's causing a disease.
You then add other genetic material, including bovine material.
You add antibiotics.
You're using material overwhelmingly from kidney cells, monkey kidney cells, and you put into the mix antibiotics that are known to be toxic to kidney cells.
You also withdraw all nutrition from the genetic sample.
So obviously it's going to start to degrade.
So what happens then is the cellular material starts to decay.
And I kid you not, what they then say is that's decaying because of the virus.
So it's not decaying because you've taken away all nutrients from the material.
And that you've added antibiotics, which are toxic to the material.
And you've added all this other genetic material to it.
So it's a kind of a dog's breakfast of genetic material, which you're claiming some in there is the virus, and that's causing what you claim to be this disease.
Well, yeah, that's how we do it.
Yes, that's how you do it. And it's a load of old crap!
And when, they don't do them, but when proper independent people have done the same experiment, the same process, with material that's not claimed to be diseased, that's not claimed to have a virus, guess what?
The material degrades in exactly the same way.
So, it's not The virus, they claim, that's causing the problem.
It's the process they're using to decide that a virus is causing the problem.
That's how they claim SARS-CoV-2 exists.
It has never been isolated.
Not a single paper on planet Earth showing this has been isolated.
There have been Freedom of Information Act requests galore all over the world to health authorities and to governments.
Can you produce the paper, the scientific proof, that this SARS-CoV-2 virus, alleged to cause COVID-19, has been isolated and shown to exist?
Not one of those requests has come back with what was asked for, because they don't have it.
You have the head of the Chinese CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the equivalent of the American version, saying publicly, the problem is the virus has never been isolated.
And more information has come to light about that, which I'm going to come to in a second.
So the so-called virus has never been isolated and shown to exist.
And the alleged cases and the alleged deaths are being scammed by the most blatant manipulation of material in terms of data.
And this is what's come out this week.
This is an article by John Rapoport.
He's a Californian proper journalist who's been on this case from the start, that there is no virus.
I mean, I've been saying it since the spring of 2020.
In fact, the moment I said it in a very high-profile interview, that's when I was banned from all these media platforms like YouTube and Facebook and stuff.
Because that's the Rubicon.
That's the line that they don't want crossed more than any other.
That there actually is no virus.
That's the scale of the deceit.
So this is John's article this week.
CDC, FDA confess they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus.
CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in America, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, these leading bodies in responding to the pandemic that isn't.
And John says the following.
The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.
The release is titled Lab Alert Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 testing.
And it begins, John says, explosively like this.
After December 31st, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, for emergency use authorization of the CDC 2019 novel coronavirus real-time RT-PCR diagnostic panel.
The assay first introduced in February 2020 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 only.
So they're talking here about withdrawing the request for authorization to use the RT-PCR test in its current form, which has produced all the cases worldwide since this farce began, this hoax began.
And through the 28-day period I talked about, has produced all the death figures for COVID-19 and this is why almost the entirety of people who have said to have died from COVID-19 have had one, two, three, four or more what they call co-morbidities reasons to die because they've died of those reasons And COVID-19 has gone on the death certificate because of a test, not testing for a virus.
So the release goes on.
CDC is providing this advanced notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
And John Rappaport rightly says, many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test.
Well, it's not going to do that, is it?
Because the PCR test is the whole foundation of the scam by producing the cases and then the deaths.
And he says...
Many people believe that this means that the CDC is giving up the PCR test as a means of detecting the virus.
But he says, I don't think the CDC is saying that at all.
And he's absolutely right.
They're saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they're replacing what the test is looking for With a better quote reference sample, a better marker, a better target, a better piece of RNA supposedly, supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
So the CDC, FDA are confessing, John says, there has been a problem with With the PCR test, which has been used to detect the virus starting in February of 2020, right up to this minute.
A problem with the test that has produced all the alleged cases that has justified the lockdown and all the fascism that's gone with it.
All the masks, all of it.
In other words, he says, the millions and millions of COVID cases based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.
And here, he says, is the killer quote.
During the early months of the coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, pandemic, clinical specimens of the virus were not readily available to developers of the IVDs in vitro diagnostics to detect SARS-CoV-2.
They were working with a test without having the virus.
And they couldn't have the virus.
Of course, the virus doesn't freaking exist.
Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from...
This is a quote from the Food and Drug Administration.
Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources, for example, gene-specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA, for analytical and clinical performance evaluation.
This is the material they used, as I'll come to you.
To make up the code of the virus using a computer.
While validation of these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that use contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different different Gene-specific synthetic or genomic nucleic acid sources.
Different computer programs.
SARS-CoV-2 was created on a computer and the variants are subtle variations, other computer programs, of the original computer program.
How can you have a variant of a virus that doesn't exist?
You can't. That's why they have to desperately kid us that it does.
So, John Rappaport comes up with a translation of what you've just heard.
We at the CDC did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.
Yes, it's unbelievable, right?
Says John. Well, actually, just a little bit.
The bigger the lie, the more we believe it.
And that's the test, John says, that we've been using all along.
So we contrived samples of the virus.
We fabricated, we lied, we made up, invented synthetic gene sequences, and we said these sequences had to be close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 without having the faintest idea what we are doing because, again, we did not have an actual specimen of the virus.
And no one's ever had one.
Why? It doesn't exist.
We have proof, he says in continuing the translation, there was something called SARS-CoV-2 when there's no proof of that whatsoever.
And he says this amazing FDA document goes to say the agency has granted emergency approval.
Wait for this one. Oh, take me on, mother.
It's mad down here. The amazing FDA document goes on to say that the agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the fake pandemic.
59 and quote from the FDA. It is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different genetic specific synthetic or genomic nucleic acid sources.
And as John says in his translation, each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus, the virus we didn't have.
Obviously, then these tests would give unreliable results.
So not only has there been one PCR test not testing for the virus and actually based on a computer program mock-up of what they claim is the virus there's been 59 of them and each of them based on a different code And this is what has produced the cases worldwide.
That is the foundation of this whole hoax.
But don't worry, John says.
Be happy because now the CDC and the FDA say they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients.
They have better targets for the PCR test and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying then, but they're not lying now.
They were contriving, but now they're telling the truth.
If you believe that, he says, I have a fountain of youth water for sale and extracted from lead-contaminated systems in Flint, Michigan.
Here once again, he says, and this is confirming, you know, what I said a few minutes ago.
Here once again, I report virology's version of we isolated the virus.
They have a soup they can make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material.
Because the cells start to die, the researchers assume a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and the virus must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted.
The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell killing and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup or that it is doing the cell killing or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell death, in this circumstance, isolation of the virus.
And I did an interview once, relatively recently, with someone from the alternative media.
The virus does exist because people in the city of New York were dying.
Well, I have no problem with that.
My question is, again, what of?
And he said that, you know, it was basically splitting hairs to say that the virus was in with other genetic material and that there were hundreds of papers that showed the virus had been isolated.
No. They claim the virus had been isolated on the basis of that procedure I've just described.
And the idea that having a virus in with other genetic material and antibiotics and all this stuff Is not relevant to proving the virus is causing the disease.
It's quite breathtaking, frankly.
But that's what you're dealing with.
And as John says about this claim to isolate the virus, to say this is a non-secretar is a vast understatement.
In their universe, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab equals we separated the virus from all surrounding material.
Virology equals how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.
Other than that, he says, it's perfect.
And that interviewer, by the way, said to me, but you're not a virologist.
No, no. I'm someone with basic intelligence that knows that that way that virologists claim to isolate a virus is complete and utter baloney.
So let's go further with this.
The test also, the PCR test, also gives the authorities complete control over how many cases they have and how many cases they don't have.
Because the PCR works on a process they call amplification.
So amplification, they make more and more and more copies of this genetic material, make lots more somethings out of something, and the material in the sample becomes more and more sensitive to the test as they amplify it.
So the more you amplify cycles of amplification, they call it, the PCR test, the more positives you're going to get.
So even this professional criminal Fauci, who's talking about 30 cycles, 35 cycles of amplification, means that anything above that, you're going to get false positives.
It's almost meaningless.
Well, the National Health Service in Britain has been using 45 cycles of amplification of the PCR test.
This is why you've got so many examples of a pawpaw fruit and a goat and a glass of cola testing positive for COVID-19.
Because at that level of amplification, a stone would test positive.
I saw at least one laboratory was using 50 cycles of amplification.
So if you want the more and more cases, because you want to justify more and more lockdown and fascism, you increase the amplification.
And if you want to give the impression at the start of 2021 that these fake jabs have nothing to do with protecting you from infectious disease, If you want to give the impression that they're working, oh look, the case has gone down, they're working.
Well, what you do is you lower the amplification and you'll get fewer fake positives and therefore fewer cases and you can say, well, look, the vaccine is working.
Well... It just so happens that on Biden's inauguration day in January of 2021, the World Health Organization, one of the most corrupt organizations on earth and controlled by this global, indeed created through the Rockefeller family, by this global cult I've been exposing for 30 years, The World Health Organization announced on that inauguration day that actually, although they said nothing throughout the whole so-called pandemic, that the PCR amplification is probably a bit high,
you know, so maybe the laboratory should lower the amplification.
So they lowered the amplification, the cases fell, and they said, oh, look, the vaccine's working.
And if you now want to...
Increase the number of cases.
Anytime you like, you increase the amplification and bingo, you get more cases.
And people think, okay, we've made a better lockdown and accept fascism because of the danger of the call of the cases.
And some other questions in terms of the virus existing.
If there's a real infectious agent, Why do you need a test testing for it, which isn't testing for it?
And the authorities know it's not testing for it.
Why do you need that? If you've got a real deadly infectious agent, a, quote, virus, why do you have to fix the death certificates to give the impression that it's killing people when it isn't?
Why would you have to do that?
Why... Why would you have to give extra financial incentives to hospitals like in America to diagnose the virus and COVID-19 as opposed to other conditions with the same alleged symptoms?
When this started out in 2020, the American government, through the Medicare system, introduced payments of Thousands of dollars, tens of thousands, to hospitals if they diagnosed COVID-19.
So they were paying hospitals $4,600 if they diagnosed regular pneumonia, $13,000 if they diagnosed COVID-19 pneumonia with the same symptoms, And $39,000, if they put a COVID-19 diagnosed patient on a ventilator, which is the figure show, will almost certainly kill them.
And why would you have to do that?
You have to do that when you don't have a virus, when you don't have an infectious agent, to give the illusion that you do.
And this is what's been going on.
And then you have this lateral flow test, which all these kids are being tested with every day.
And what the hell is on that thing that keeps going into their bodies several times a week?
Lateral flow test is so freaking useless that if you test positive, you have to have a PCR test to check if it's actually a proper positive.
And through the lateral flow test, you're getting all these pings going on, which people are being told to self-isolate when they have no symptoms or anything.
Why? Because there's nothing wrong with them.
And the whole madness is based on this testing.
Why, if you have a deadly virus, are funeral directors reporting en masse That their throughput of dead people did not increase during the period of the pandemic.
Where's the pandemic if the number of people dying wasn't increasing?
Why is it that Freedom of Information Act requests going out to councils all across Britain asking for the figures from I think it's 2015 up to 2020, 2021 of The number of burials and cremations that took place in their area.
Why was 2020, in this so-called pandemic, not a year of extra burials and cremations?
Where are all the dead people that this pandemic was supposed to have killed?
The figures didn't increase because it was done by redesignation to COVID-19
of people dying of what they always die from.
So why would they have no virus?
Why wouldn't they just release a virus or an infectious agent?
Well, first of all, when you release an infectious agent, a deadbeat one, you lost control of it.
You have no control about where it's going or anything.
And the one thing that this global cult wants all the time, because it's desperately insecure, is control of everything.
It has no ability to feel comfortable in states of flux.
It has to control anything. So releasing a deadly infectious agent, which they immediately lose control of, Not something they're going to want to do.
And the other benefit, what's the benefit of having no virus?
It means you can make it do whatever you like.
You can increase the symptoms all the time, and they have.
I mean, the symptoms goes on increasing.
Is there anything that happens to people in terms of health that's not COVID-19?
Oh, that's a sign of COVID-19.
Oh, shut up! And if you have no virus, you can invent variants of the no virus, which also don't exist, but you can invent them, claim them, and then you can manipulate the PCR amplification, the PCR test, the death certificates, so that it appears, oh, this variant's more deadly, or this variant's more transmissible.
And this is what's going on.
It is a massive, colossal contract.
And now, of course, the real punchline of all this is the fake vaccination.
That does not fit the criteria or the definition of a vaccine, which is supposed to stimulate the immune system to protect you from some condition or other disease or other.
It's not claimed that these fake vaccines do that.
And clearly, with people having these fake vaccines now, I've had me two jabs!
And there's a third one coming up now, a booster in Britain, and the same is being discussed in America, and you'll see it around the world, the booster.
And what will follow is more jabs for the variants.
And one of the ways they're going to go for that is what's happening now.
People have had these jabs.
And they are, quote, getting COVID. Well, they're not getting COVID. There is no bloody COVID. What they're doing is suffering the effects of having the fake jab, and they're calling it bloody COVID. And they're ending up in hospital.
And so...
You had the jab to protect you from this COVID, yeah.
Well, it hasn't, has it? Well, no.
So, what do you recommend?
Well, I still recommend that people should have it.
You hear this all the time. And...
So now we're having these boosters of the latest fake version of the fake vaccine.
And they're going to kill large, large, big numbers of people, particularly the elderly, because they're giving it to the vulnerable.
Why are they giving it to the vulnerable? Because they want rid of them!
The former health secretary A monumental prat called Matt Hancock, psychopath and prat.
He ordered enormous amounts, years' supply of an end-of-life drug called midazolam in the spring of 2020.
And then it was used in the care homes and other places to kill Vast numbers of old people.
These were, among them, old people who had been in hospital and had been moved into care homes because the psychopaths said, oh, we've got to clear the beds because of the COVID pandemic.
Based on a test not testing for the virus that has never been shown to exist.
So tens of thousands, this happened in New York, it happened in Michigan, it happened in lots of places.
They moved these old people out of the hospitals into the care homes and then they were given this end of life, do not resuscitate order, mass murder.
And that was called the COVID-19 first wave.
Why did they have to do that?
Because there is no freaking virus.
So they would not have had a first wave unless they manufactured it.
And they said, all these old people, they died in the care homes of COVID-19.
No, they bloody didn't.
They died from midazolam, morphine, and other things like removing their life-saving drugs and removing nutrition.
And by the way, why do you think those old people were in hospital to start with?
In New York, in Britain?
Because they were ill!
And if they were in hospital, and they were very elderly, they were probably very, very dangerously ill.
A lot of them. So they move them to the care arms.
And then they kill them. And they call it COVID-19.
This is what we're dealing with.
The level of evil is stunning.
And What we're now seeing, or we've seen in the last few weeks, is another effort to persuade us the virus exists.
Because, like I say, the Rubicon is that they absolutely don't want crossing.
Anything but that is that there is no virus.
Because the whole house of cards come down there.
Because there's no justification for lockdown.
There's no justification for social distancing.
No justification for masks.
No justification for fake vaccines.
None of it. So it's all gone.
All gone. Once you realize there is no freaking virus.
It never has been. So to continue this illusion...
They've started putting out that this virus came out of a lab in Wuhan, the highest level biosafety level lab in China.
And the line is that, generally, that it was released by accident.
And the alternative media, or a great chunk of it, has gone with, no, it was released on purpose.
So, what is the common theme of those two beliefs?
That there is a virus.
And if there is a virus, then they can start justifying lockdowns and masks and fake vaccines to meet the challenge of the virus, which everyone agrees exists.
You know, it was either released on purpose or released by accident, but it does exist.
Like I say, that's the line.
That's the Rubicon. They don't want you to cross.
So let's have a look at this.
The evidence and the alternative media, ironically, has produced enormous amounts of it, that this fake pandemic was planned for a very, very long time is overwhelming.
I mean, you're drowning in the evidence.
So now we're being asked to believe, by those who say it was released by accident, that this cabal was sitting around a table.
Everything was in place, because you see how fast it played out once they entered 2020.
But they'd made an error.
They had done.
They'd forgot to produce an infectious agent on which the whole fake pandemic was based.
So now they're sitting around a table strumming their fingers.
Waiting for a virus to be released from the Wuhan lab or some other lab by accident.
Oh God, what a bit of luck.
It's just happened. I mean, what a load of nonsense.
And then you take the released on purpose.
So you're going to release a virus, infectious agent, you claim.
Okay. And you don't want anyone to know you've done it, do you?
Oh, I'll stick with one.
So where are you going to release the...
Where are you going to release it?
Well, we thought down the street from the lab.
Do you think anyone will put the two together?
Oh.
Yeah.
Thank you.
And it's all to hide the fact, the sparkling truth throughout all of this, that there is no virus, and that is the scale of the deceit.
And you know, everything has been based on this.
No virus and a fake test.
That's the foundation of the whole scam.
Very simple. And when you've got the media not questioning anything and Silicon Valley censoring everything that is questioning the narrative, well, you can isolate the sparkling truth.
There is no virus from most of the population who then go along and get their fake jab and it will end the lives of enormous numbers of people and it will change the genetics of those that survive.
And look what's happened.
The whole global cult agenda of creating a centralized fascist dictatorship, global fascist dictatorship, has moved forward so fast because of what's happened.
And dependency on government has absolutely exploded as businesses and employment have disappeared because lockdowns have destroyed them.
And you know, The whole sequence, if you follow it, has been to lie to the public to secure the next sequence or the next stage of the sequence.
So what did they say to start with?
Get tested and we'll go back to normal.
Everybody must get tested.
Because then you can go back to normal and we'll show you pictures of full football stadiums and people in theatres and stuff.
This is what you do when you get more tests.
Oh, test, test, test.
So what does that mean? The more you test with a test not testing for the virus, the more fake positives you're going to get, which you're going to call cases.
So far from taking you back to normal the tests become fake cases and as the fake cases increase you go further and further away from normal because all we must protect people from the virus because the case is going up.
Of course the deaths go up because 28 days after a positive test if you die of anything else COVID-19 goes on the on the death certificate.
So then they go to the next stage.
Well If you want to go back to normal, all you've got to do is get the jab.
Get the jab. And so vast numbers of people have got the jab because that will allow them to go back to normal.
And if you have the jab, you won't have to wear a mask.
If you have the jab, you'll be able to do this and do that and do the other.
What's happening now in America with the Biden administration?
They're saying, oh, actually, if you've had the jabs, you've still got to wear a mask in these situations.
And you've still got to do this. You've still got to do that.
But the lie secured the mass jabbing.
And what they're trying to do now, of course, is to make it impossible to live a normal life or any kind of normal life.
Unless you have the fake jab.
Why? Because the jab is not about your health, it's about mass depopulation and transforming those that are left into a totally different form of genetics based on synthetic biology, which is what's in these fake jabs.
And they're self-replicating synthetic and nanotechnology, and thus they are impacting upon the body more and more with every passing day, every passing week, and thus the impact upon human health and human life is going to go on compounding as we go through this winter and into 2022 and 2023.
And so that leaves those that are awakening to this Who can see with an enormous responsibility.
Because without those people, without us, no one is going to push back on this.
No one is going to stop this reaching its conclusion.
And so those with the gift of being able to see what is going on when the vast majority are completely asleep, like automatons, robots.
Yeah, yeah, there's this and y'all want me to do this.
Okay, I'll do that. Thank you, sir.
That mentality is hardly going to resist what's going on, stop what's going on.
So it's down to us. And I would say it is very, very important That people, no matter what the immediate consequences, do not concede a freaking inch to this tyranny.
When they start, and they've started, and we've seen nothing yet, demonizing those that won't have the life-ending, life-changing jab.
And put all the sanctions in place against us.
We must not concede.
We mustn't say, well, we did our best, but I'm going to have to have it because I don't care what the consequences are of standing up to this.
The consequences of not standing up to it and refusing to submit and submitting, rather, are far, far worse than standing up and saying I'm not having it.
Okay, there'll be consequences for that, yeah, but, you know, there's other ways to live your life.
But the consequences of not saying no to this fake jab and all these other impositions It's enormously greater than the consequences of saying, here are no further.
And, you know, the alternative media, that part of it, which is kind of the majority, that still believes there is a virus, they're going to have to face reality eventually that there isn't.
Because this No virus.
And the test that makes it appear as if there is one is the whole foundation of this hoax, the whole pillar of this hoax.
And when we realize there is no virus, and that's the scale of deceit that we've been subjected to, then the house of cards, the deceit, comes falling down.
And people realise, A, the scale of the lie, and B, the scale of the sheer undiluted evil that is telling the lie.
The coronavirus pandemic started in China.
Oxygen, medical supplies, and physical drugs have continued.
One of the five vaccines originally Stage one you create a problem.
It could be a manufactured virus.
You want a reaction and you want them to either say, do something, or you want them to accept what the authorities suggest must be done.
So one of the agendas is to massively cull the population.
They want to reduce the numbers.
▲
Export Selection