The War On Men And Women - Part Of A Massive Agenda To Change The Nature Of 'Human' - David Icke Dot
|
Time
Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the David Icke Dot
Connect video cast.
Joe Biden, President of the USA, he said in October that an executive order was basically a dictatorship, obviously referring to the fact that Trump had done a few in his four years.
He then then went on to sign, I think it was, was it 17 or 18 in his first day?
You've got to love it. Dad, how are you, mate?
Good! Battling on as usual.
Yeah, I've been writing about the extraordinary nature of executive orders for a lot of years, going back to the time of Bill Clinton, because they are really extraordinary.
One guy, the president, in a country of 330 million people, just signs a piece of paper And suddenly it's the law.
And these were described actually by a Clinton aide, who I quoted in one of my books, very accurately when he described executive orders as, stroke of the pen, law of the land.
There's no debate. There's no discussion on Capitol Hill.
Not that really matters anymore.
But there is not even that.
Just law of the land.
And they are a form of dictatorship, and Biden was right on that, but of course he's now using them because it's all a scam, it's all a vaudeville show, and what you criticize other people for, you then do yourself because it's expedient to you.
Now the one I want to talk about today, which, even though it has massive implications for women, is...
Is not considered in the greater context, the dot connector context, in which I'm going to put it today.
This was the one.
Biden's gender discrimination order offers hope for young trans athletes.
Orders delivered incremental win, the order delivers incremental win for athletes seeking to participate as their identified gender in high school and college sports.
Quote, children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room or school sports, the directive says.
Adding that the incoming administration is committed to prevent and combat discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation.
So what this is allowing and encouraging is people in male bodies with far greater testosterone, muscle mass and all the rest.
to compete in women's sport because the person in the male body says they identify as female.
And just to put this into context, Nearly 300 high school boys in America could beat the fastest female sprinter in the world.
So what this is going to do, what it is already doing where it is employed, is destroying women's sport.
Where is the inclusivity?
and equality in that so the executive order section one policy says every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear no matter who they are and whom they love so what about women not living in fear Of people in male bodies, saying they identify as female, walking into their toilets, walking into their sports locker room and dressing rooms, quite but illegally, what about the feelings of women and the rights and privacy of women?
There's a reason this is going on, and I'm going to come to it, and it's a very big reason too.
So the executive order says children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they'll be denied access to the restroom, locker room, or school sports.
But where does that relate to women worrying about things like I've just talked about?
Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing they will not be fined, demoted or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to male stereotypes.
Adults should not be fired, demoted or mistreated.
What about the Trump supporters and the wider pushbackers who are opposing the fascist agenda of Biden?
What about their right not to be fired, demoted, or mistreated, which is exactly what's going on now?
Of course it's all bullshit, and my God, you are going to hear some bullshit.
In the Biden years, because this is going to be, already is becoming, the most extreme regime in American history.
All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender or sexual orientation.
But, okay, so what about equal treatment under the law for men?
Because you get, of course, enormous adverse response and abuse if you challenge any of this transgender agenda.
You still get a lot of pushback and abuse if you question the whole area of women and the laws surrounding them.
But say what you like about men.
Anything bloody goes.
And I'm not saying that because I'm a man.
But because if you want fairness, which this hypocrite claims to want but doesn't, then you want fairness.
You want everyone treated equally, whether they're man, woman, transgender, or whatever.
So... What is this really all about?
Because if you do not have people with male bodies competing in sport with other male bodies with all the strength, speed, advantages that brings, then you are going to destroy women's sport.
Gone. Finished.
Kaput. And Why, when we are talking about more and more rights for women, I think you should have rights for human beings, whatever the expression they take.
But we've got the rhetoric here of rights for women, while women's rights are being deleted in favour of transgender rights.
Why is that? Well, before the abuse comes back from the transgender community, I don't care what you identify as.
No interest to me.
None of my business. But you make it my business and everyone else's business by seeking to impose it on others and take their rights away in favor of yours.
And here's the irony, and this is where I'm going with this.
The transgender community is not the focus of what's going on.
This is not being done for their benefit, this stuff with sport and locker rooms and toilets, not being done for their benefit.
They are the means to an end, not the end itself.
And to explain why, and why men were first targeted, quite blatantly, toxic masculinity, and now women, as I predicted they would, are starting to be targeted in terms of their rights.
It's because the agenda, the gender agenda of this global cult that I expose is for there to be a new human that has no gender.
Not a transgender human, a no gender human.
And as I'll come to this, quote, COVID fake vaccine and its DNA manipulation, Is part of that agenda to create a new type of human.
And so know the outcome and you'll see the journey.
And if you know that's the outcome, then the journey, the daily changes, incremental steps towards that outcome will be Crystally clear.
And so this executive order relating to women's sports and locker rooms and toilets, etc., is one of those stepping stones to the no gender human.
And it was described, this whole process and agenda was described by Aldous Huxley in Brave New World.
Where he described a humanity that no longer procreated.
That children, babies, were decanted in world state hatcheries and it was all done technologically.
And what we have already seen emerging is artificial wounds.
Already, it's happening.
And the idea in Brave New World, and Huxley wasn't coming totally from his imagination, just like Orwell wasn't.
They had connections into this This other world of secret societies and semi-secret groups and the rest that I call the global cult.
And that's why they've been so accurate with the passage of time in what they said and what is happening now.
So the idea in Brave New World is that you have the end of parents.
No more parents. Not necessary.
Because there's no more procreation.
That's why men are being targeted and increasingly now, and you're going to see a lot more of it, women's rights are being targeted because neither are needed in a no-gender world for producing or reproducing the species.
So the end of parents and the bringing up of children, not by mum and dad, but by the state directly, And another dot to connect into this is the gathering an ever more fascistic imposition by the state upon the bringing up of children.
You have enormous numbers of children now taken from their parents for the most spurious reasons by the state and social services, the SS. In the way it expresses itself that way.
You've got more and more control, as my books again predicted a long time ago, of the bringing up of children by schools, which are agents and assets of the state.
So this process is going on step by step by step.
And so you see the...
The absolute plummeting sperm counts among men around the world.
You see the explosion in fertility clinics.
You see the questioning by many doctors and scientists of the effect of this COVID vaccine on the placenta.
In a way that would make women infertile.
Because what's going on is they want this new synthetic biological human and they want the end of the biological human.
So they don't want that continuing to procreate.
They want it replaced with a synthetic biological human.
And so you have this constant theme Of sperm counts falling and fertility clinics, etc.
As people find it more and more difficult to give birth to children.
And what we are seeing with this transgender agenda is the targeting of the children and the targeting of the young quite blatantly and systematically To confuse their perception of gender.
This is now everywhere.
And they want to confuse the young and the kids about gender.
Their gender, gender in general.
Because they want to confuse on the road to fusing gender into the no gender gender.
And this is why you're seeing this gathering discipline of science called synthetic biology.
And this is why this COVID fake vaccine, it's not a vaccine at all, by any means, Definition of what a vaccine is supposed to do and be.
It is a medical procedure to use synthetic means to change human DNA. And what we are now hearing, again, it was so predictable.
I talked about it months ago.
They're now saying, oh, well, no, it's not just one vaccine.
COVID fake vaccine in 2021.
We're going to have to have them every year.
And the every year is about manipulating cumulatively human genetics and changing it in to the non-procreating synthetic biological human 2.0.
And this connects into this whole smart grid that's unfolding, where every device, every piece of technology is connected to the internet.
Through the internet, all the things around us are now controlled, not least by AI. And we have the stated plan.
In the next 10 years, to start to connect the human mind to AI, so AI becomes the human mind.
Now, to cope, this is part of it, to cope with the enormous amounts of radiation that is necessary to drive this smart grid Which controls everything connected to it, from your fridge to your car to your mind.
The human, the biological human, is going to seriously struggle to cope with that.
So they're moving to another type of human.
This is only one reason, but it's a big one.
So that it's able to be a computer terminal in the smart grid global control system.
And so they're not just talking and rolling out massively across the world now about 5G. They're already talking about 6G and 7G. And if you look at the The almost indescribable Explosion of technologically generated radiation in our atmosphere and what we're interacting with all the time.
Compared with I was a kid in the 1950s, it is absolutely staggering.
It's been described as the biggest experiment with human life in human history, but at the core of the core, it's not an experiment.
They know exactly what they're doing.
And so this is the whole transgender situation.
You know, one of my phrases is, if it comes out of nowhere and suddenly it's everywhere, it's the agenda.
And of course, that's what's happened with the whole transgender subject.
It came out of nowhere and was suddenly everywhere.
And, you know, the laws being changed so fast.
And if someone pressed a button on the next stage of the plan.
But It's not transgender people.
It's not about you.
They're just telling you it is because it's a stepping stone to a much bigger outcome.
Like I say, you are not the end in what is happening.
You are simply being used as the means.
And we need to come together, whether you're transgender, male, female, whatever.
It doesn't matter to me what you choose to identify as.
But instead of being divided and ruled and at war with each other, we need to realize that we're all in the gun sights of this.
And what's been happening, Gaz, with the attacks, the incessant attacks on men and maleness, And dividing them from women, the whole Me Too movement, which was another elite-generated theme, they want to divide us.
They want to divide men from women.
You've got these strident extreme feminists who, you know, anything male is horrible.
And all these divisions and fault lines are being put in Between the different expressions of humanity, so we're fighting each other while their agenda goes boom, boom, boom, boom onwards.
So this executive order by Biden this week is not for the benefit of transgender people.
That's just the excuse. It's another step.
Towards the goal of the synthetic, biological, no-gender human.
I'm always suspicious of any community.
You know where they say, oh, the LGBTQ community, or the Jewish community, or the Black community?
As if there's a group of people that all think the same.
There's a consensus, which there absolutely isn't.
And the Jewish community, I mean, that was ridiculous.
You had people speaking for the Jewish community who were absolutely Israel-firsters, who were attacking Jewish people who didn't toe the line.
So the community bit annoys me anyway, because there isn't a community.
Everyone's individual and everyone has different opinions and different views.
And my experience of the trans community is that actually it's not made up of trans people.
The activists in the overwhelming numbers are not transgender.
They put their pronouns in the bio and all that sort of nonsense.
But it's all very much virtue signalling.
Look at me, aren't I? Brilliant.
My heart's on my sleeve. It's amazing.
And when you actually have conversations with transgender people, they don't agree with a lot of it anyway.
They're just being spoken for, which I'm always suspicious of because I go, right, who are these leaders of these communities then and what's their agenda?
Because it's certainly not the community itself.
Another thing you tend to come across when you talk about stuff like this, Dad, is that it seems too fantastic to people.
He's just signed an executive order.
It's a nice thing. You'd have to find horrible in everything.
And you look at it and you go, okay, well, so with the, you know, with the radiation stuff you spoke about, you were talking about when you were a kid back in the 50s, but we're 18 to the power of 10 times more radiation now in the atmosphere than there was 150 years ago.
That's insane. And that's obviously going to affect people.
That's a very real thing.
And when it comes to the transgender side of it, they're already destroying women's sport, especially in the colleges.
There's a transgender cyclist called Rachel McKinnon.
I've had the great pleasure of having conversations with her in the past.
She's quite a nasty piece of work, to be fair.
She's female world champion, right?
But she's not had any changes apart from taking some hormone treatment.
And all the hormone treatment does, it brings down the testosterone levels.
And so when they get to a testosterone level that's the same as a woman, they go, see, it's exactly the same as the woman.
Or not the fact that she's about two foot bigger and wider and stronger and the VO2 max is bigger and the muscle density mass, the bone density mass, the structure of the bones, particularly around the hips, are completely different.
That goes out, you want me to have a conversation about that?
And when you look at Rachel McKinnon's times when she competed as a male, wouldn't even get near anything.
Wouldn't get in the top 500.
But she's world champion now.
Yeah, what you're looking at is the tyranny of the group.
So there's an agenda.
This is where we want to take the world.
So what you do, you covertly...
engineer these groups and the people that are the self-appointed spokesmen and women for the group, they then operate as if everyone Within that group agrees with what they say.
So you've got the transgender activists, and I've read books by transgender people who've been through the full transition, regretted it, and then wanted to warn others about Of the consequences you can face if you're not very, very careful in analyzing the reasons why you are motivated to do this.
And when they try to warn other kids, youngsters, of the dangers and pitfalls of going through the transition, it's the transgender activists that abuse them and call for them to be censored.
Now, when that happens, you know That the transgender activist movement is not there for the benefit of transgender people or people thinking of going in that direction.
Because if you were, you would want everyone, not least children and young people, to know all the information, all the possibilities and all the possible consequences of going through with it.
You want that and you would be encouraging people who've been through the transition and regretted it to tell their story.
But that's not what happens.
What happens is those that are within the transgender arena who speak out against the activist agenda in whatever form The activists turn on them and treat them, as Jewish people are treated by the ultra-Zionists, even more vehemently and with hostility than people who are not Jewish or people who are not transgender.
So let's just drop the idea that these self-appointed activist groups, BLM's another one, Black Lives Matter.
Yeah, okay, I'm not going to argue with that.
Why would I? But Black Lives Matter, capital BLM, I am certainly going to challenge that.
Because it's funded by the same billionaires and billionaire corporations to a fantastic amount of money.
The same corporations and family networks, which if you go back Those that control these corporations today, if you go back, you find that they were the same families and networks that were behind slavery.
And now they're funding Black Lives Matter because Black Lives Matter.
As if they bloody care.
And then you have the same situation.
Black people who talk against or challenge The impositions and the narratives of the Black Lives Matter organization, elite-funded few, they get targeted, even though they're black, they get targeted more vehemently than anyone else.
And you've seen this video footage of white people, white young girls, Absolutely abusing black police officers as being an agent of the enemy because they are not doing what the white young kid says that they should because that's the party line.
And behind all these groups All these activist groups pushing this agenda within the great all-encompassing term woke are funded by billionaires, billionaire corporations and assets of this global cult.
You have in George Soros a global financier Who's funded all this to the tune of in excess of $30 billion and more, who actually said, I don't look at the social consequences of what I do as a financier.
I'm just there to make money.
Why would someone like that finance all these groups?
of so-called social justice warriors in their different forms because they're being used, played like their string section to advance an agenda of the elite few and the transgender Community, as they call it. And again, I absolutely go along with this whole idea of here's a community, so everyone thinks the same.
No, no, no, no. Just what they want you to believe.
But the whole transgender arena, shall we say, is again being played together.
By the string section to advance the agenda I'm talking about, which is to transform the nature of the human being into a non-procreating, basically, clone.
I saw a podcast on trigonometry a little while ago, shared it on the site, with a whistleblower who was within the Tavistock Institute, who was just basically saying, you know, that kids, they're not just in you come, there you go.
They're almost pressured and coerced into going through with transitions and stuff when they're blatantly not ready.
I mean, when I was young, I mean, I had long hair, I wore eyeliner, I had nail varnish.
You know, someone would look at me then and go, ooh, hang on.
Is he got a...
Do you know what I mean? And then they can coerce you and have conversations with you when you're impressionable because you're young.
Do you know what I mean? Everything is new and you don't know yourself and you don't know what's happening.
But when I look at it, I remember watching that podcast and it's huge.
Hang on, this is a whistleblower from within the Tavistock Institute.
This is what... Oh yeah, mainstream silence.
And you go, okay, so you can't talk about transgender.
You can't talk about climate change.
You can't talk about Israel. These are the things you can't talk about.
You can't talk about Soros. And obviously we saw what happened to that fellow on Fox News when he mentioned Soros.
He got shot down immediately because you're not allowed to talk about it because of various reasons.
And another one of those, which I've looked at through all of this, is two things.
One is the PCR test.
How is the mainstream media not jumping on the PCR test?
When the World Health Organization is openly admitting now, because they've got no choice, that they have a problem with it.
And then you go, okay, and it's there on the TV. We've had 100,000 deaths, bollocks, but we've had 100,000 deaths, asterisks, of any cause within 28 days, which is actually 60 days since August, of positive COVID diagnosis.
So it's not even a test. Sometimes it can just be a doctor's diagnosis, put it on your chart.
Those two things, if you're a journalist, which within the mainstream you're not, because it's an oxymoron, you would look at those two things and go, that's huge.
Let's report on that. And if you looked into the PCR test, you'd go back to this fellow Drosten, where it all comes back from Germany.
And people don't even seem to know who this guy is, Dad.
Yeah, well, I've got some information on Drosten, and this is pivotal.
Because the whole foundation of the COVID hoax is three things.
Well, two things, but expressed in three ways.
The PCR test that's not testing for the virus.
but is picking up genetic material of many and various kinds in the samples and pinging positive not for a virus but for genetic material which is naturally in the body and that's what gives them their cases which they then justify imposing fascism To meet the runaway cases of the alleged COVID-19.
Then you have the death certificates, which are, again, founded on the test.
Because if you test positive, then 28 days, et cetera, et cetera, you die of any other cause, you become a COVID death.
And the third point in this scam, the third pillar, if you like, Is the claim that asymptomatic people, I have nothing wrong with them, can pass on what's not wrong with them to other people, which is the absolute foundation of justifying lockdown.
If they hadn't claimed, with no evidence by the way, that people with no symptoms could pass on the quote virus, they would have no foundation for locking everybody down.
And so you come back To where did this PCR protocol for deciding that someone's got the virus, where did it come from?
Well, first of all, the PCR test course itself was created in the 1980s by Kerry Mullis, who said publicly it cannot test for infectious disease.
So why are they using it?
Because it's a scam.
And so that brings us to Drosten.
He has a real history, which I'm going to go through some highlights of it.
He's a German virologist, and he became a, quote, star of the COVID pandemic and came out with a protocol using the PCR test to test for SARS-CoV-2.
And so it goes back to him and a few people around him that developed the means by which fantastic numbers of people worldwide could test positive for a virus they don't even have.
And he came out in January 2020, right at the time, perfect time, with this protocol.
It was not peer-reviewed.
They say it was peer-reviewed in 24 hours.
In other words, it wasn't.
But immediately, the Gates voice box, head of the World Health Organization, Tedros, recommended this Drosten protocol to everyone around the world to test for who had the virus and who didn't.
And on davidhack.com this week, We posted a transcript of a German TV, well, documentary, if you like.
And the headline was this, Secret File on Christian Drosten.
The German virologist who is responsible for the PCR test COVID protocol that has been producing fake positives, fake cases across the world since January 2020 used to justify global fascism.
It's no surprise that a prominent German lawyer is pursuing a class action lawsuit against Drosten for crimes against humanity along with Tedros.
The cohort that sold it to the world.
So I'm going to pick out some highlights from this documentary.
It was Christian Drosten who in January 2020 developed the PCR test for corona, which became the standard method for detecting the COVID-19 coronavirus worldwide.
He's a very influential advisor to the German federal government and has participated as an expert at numerous government press conferences.
He must be telling the truth then.
His evaluation has thus had a decisive influence on important political decisions, such as compulsory wearing of masks, the interruption of regular education, and the closure of all cafes, bars, and restaurants.
And what it does first of all and this will recall in people's minds a bloke in Britain called Professor Neil Ferguson who produced the ludicrous intelligence insulting computer models that justified the first lockdown with hysterical claims about the number of deaths that would happen in America, Britain and other countries if lockdown didn't happen.
So The reason it will remind you of Ferguson is this, Christian Drosten and his false predictions, brackets C, Ferguson.
2003, SARS. He said, if the epidemic cannot be postponed in the near future, it is possible that there will always be new cases of SARS. If lung diseases of this kind were to break out regularly in some countries, this could have serious effects on their economies and effective vaccine can be expected in one or two years at the earliest.
And what turned out, since the beginning of the so-called SARS epidemic, 2003, there have only been 8,096 cases worldwide and 774 deaths, and that's if you believe what they're telling you.
Had a total of nine cases of SARS and not a single death.
And one of the things about Drosten is, again, see Bill Gates, is that his answer to everything, all these different things that come up, is vaccine, vaccine, vaccine.
So his next forecast came in 2009.
And it was swine flu.
It is a widespread viral infection with side effects far more severe than anyone could imagine from the most dangerous vaccine.
In other words, it doesn't matter about vaccine safety because it won't be as bad as the virus.
Although there are no reliable indications of the number of people who are ill, Drosten urged people to get vaccinated against swine flu.
You see the recurring theme.
And what actually happened?
The prophesied epidemic never happened.
In spite of this, Western governments brought vaccines for several hundred million euros, which the vast majority of the population refused despite Drosten's insistent recommendations.
What's more, the vaccines caused far more serious damage than swine flu itself.
And the documentary says Drosten's frightening predictions Which always aims to impose the standard vaccine solution, turned out to be fatal errors of assessment resulting in enormous economic damage.
Hello, present situation not accepted.
How is it possible that Drosten, with his multiple horror predictions, continues to appear credible as the government advisor?
Well, it is quite simple to answer that question.
If you give the authorities what they don't want to hear, by telling them about a situation of health or whatever, that doesn't justify what the authorities want to do, then your career won't last very long as a government advisor.
But you keep telling the authorities what they do want to hear so that they can justify what they want to do.
And no matter how appalling your record of accuracy, you'll keep getting employed by the government.
See Neil Ferguson.
So then the documentary goes into major questioning of Christian Drosten and his alleged doctorate, and then comes to the PCR test itself.
Christian Drosten and his PCR test for coronavirus.
The PCR test for coronavirus developed in haste by Drosten in January 2020 for the detection of coronavirus as the quote test of the year.
The results of this test are used by governments around the world to legitimize the most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against their citizens.
As early as 2014, Drosten said about this PCR test method, the method is so sensitive that it can detect even a single molecule of the virus genome.
If such a pathogen has, for example, spent one day on the nasal mucosa of a nurse without her getting sick or noticing anything, she suddenly becomes a case of, in this situation, MERS. And that, of course, is going against everything that the creator of the test, Kerry Mullis, said, which is it cannot detect infectious disease.
So the question is asked, did Drosten choose this PCR method in a calculated way to trigger a test pandemic, which is what we had?
Not a pandemic of a...
A virus. Pandemic of a test.
Not testing for a virus, but claim to.
Ongoing scientific research by 22 top scientists reinforces this suspicion, it says, as it denies the scientific basis for Drosten's study, which served as the basis for the WHO's implementation of the test.
Not connected at all.
With his non-scientific study and his unsuitable PCR test based on it, one man played a decisive role in the whole coronavirus scenario, Christian Drosten.
Not only him, but also the test he developed turns out to be not very credible under closer examination.
You're not kidding.
Now... Christian Drosten and his many links.
It describes how he's linked to a guy called Olfert Lant, and this chap is one of the regular co-authors of Drosten's studies, and also this study involving the alleged coronavirus.
In addition, this bloke, Land, is the owner of a Berlin-based biotech company which manufactures tests for the coronavirus.
So he's coming out and doing the protocol and his mate is manufacturing the tests.
Drosten and Lant seem to have discovered a successful business model.
In the event of a pandemic and the emergence of the most diverse viruses, they jointly developed the corresponding PCR test.
This was already the case in 2002-2003 for SARS, in 2011 for EHEC, in 2012 for MERS, in 2016 for Zika virus, in 2017 for yellow fever.
The same pattern is still in place, which they have now also used for coronavirus.
Land admitted to a newspaper, a Berlin newspaper, the testing design and development came from the centre where Drosten works.
We simply implemented it immediately in the form of a kit.
And if we don't...
Now, here's another major area.
And if we don't have the virus...
Which originally only existed in Wuhan.
Even then, not in its natural form.
Computer generated.
We can make a synthetic gene to simulate the genome of the virus.
They don't have a bloody virus!
They've simulated one!
Another foundation of the whole scam.
That's what we did very quickly, said Drosten's mate.
From the start of the coronavirus crisis, the Lant Biotech company was making test kits for 1,500,000 tests a week, and by February of 2020, it tripled its turnover.
In the meantime, these tests have obviously brought in huge profits.
It then goes on to talk about the big pharma cartel connections to Drosten, and then concludes this.
Fatal erroneous predictions, numerous unqualified contradictions about his doctoral thesis, a hastily developed PCR corona test with fundamental scientific flaws and an unsuspected swamp of financial entanglements take away all credibility from Christian Drosten.
If the key person at the center of the entire coronavirus crisis proves to be uncredible after closer examination, this raises serious questions.
One, should we not finally, because of these non-scientific foundations, Analyze all the events linked to the coronavirus with the inescapable economic and financial collapse that threatens entire peoples to find those who are pulling the strings and profiting from this situation in the shadows.
Two, could the aim not be a staging for a power grab and even under the pretext of fighting the pandemic lead to the setting up of digital surveillance of entire peoples?
Well, big time yes to that.
And three, why don't the mass media, which has the task of providing critical media coverage, reveal the Drosten dossier, but keep it under wraps?
Because the mainstream media is owned by the same cult that is driving the virus hoax.
And so here you have this central figure That's pivotal in everything that's happened since January 2020.
No wonder he's being taken to court for crimes against humanity.
And his credibility and background is extraordinary.
And if people don't get it now, after what's revealed about him, Then I don't suspect they'll ever get it.
That's half the thing for me now, is how are people not getting it?
And you're just seeing stuff where, like coming out of America, where, oh, try and wear three masks or even four masks if you want to be safe.
And you're just thinking, I'm looking at that like you're mental.
You know you're mental.
But there's other people going, four, I've only got three.
I'll get another one. And it makes me wonder now, Dad, at the moment, if you go into a shot, have you got a mask, sir?
I wonder if you've only got two masks on, can you put a third mask on, sir?
Is that what's coming now?
I do wonder, Dad.
Well, it is coming. What we're seeing, and again, you know, look for the patterns.
When something comes out of nowhere and is suddenly everywhere, once somebody starts and people start talking, there's a theme emerging.
You know it's the next stage of the agenda that people are being prepared for.
So, single masks.
That's how it started.
Then mandatory masks.
And now they're talking about two masks, three masks.
And one doctor who's so moronic, I wouldn't let him diagnose acne.
He's talking about four masks.
Now, it's funny because I'm not a doctor, but I have noticed, this may shock people, but I have noticed that people have to breathe or they die.
I've noticed that. I've noticed it myself.
And when you look at the consequences for oxygen intake and breathing in your own carbon dioxide of one mask, what the hell is two, three and four going to do?
The doctor who came out and said, take your mask off because it's killing you.
One mask. Was absolutely right.
And it's incremental.
I keep saying, I've said from the start, there's a script.
And they introduce something, they get you used to that.
Because if they went, imagine when they introduced the mandatory mask, they said you have to wear four or three.
People go, what?
So you go one first.
And then you go too, and so on.
And what you're doing is not just damaging health through oxygen deficit and carbon dioxide and all the toxins that build up in masks.
Imagine the toxins build up in poor masks.
You're not only doing that, you're changing people psychologically.
This week, I got an email from Kathy O'Brien, who spent her entire young life from the age of five, six, into her thirties, in the infamous MKUltra mind control horror.
In America, which came out in the 1970s, only part of it, a small part of it.
It involved the Pentagon, it involved the CIA, and it involved major, major figures like the Bush family.
The Clintons were involved as well.
And it involved a stream of universities in America and Canada.
And Kathy told me months ago that her daughter Kelly, who was born into captivity in MKUltra, was forced to wear a mask from the age of two because in mind control manipulation it dehumanized her it took away a sense of individuality and crucially it reduced the amount of oxygen going to the brain that was obviously needs a lot of oxygen to develop when you're two and a child or even a young person and because of that deprivation of oxygen to the brain the mind control manipulation And rewiring of the brain became much easier.
So masks are about mind control.
And they're about dismantling the psyche.
Dismantling self-respect.
And she sent me this week this article which we put on DavidOak.com.
And I'm just going to read you one or two bits from it.
Because, you know, I've been saying since all this began that The study I did of mind control, NK Ultra, etc., from 1996 in America, right across the millennium, showed me how the techniques of individual mind control work.
And suddenly, when this started playing out in 2020, I'm watching the same NK Ultra mind control techniques being used on the population.
There's mass mind control going on.
So she says this.
It is common sense that our physical senses of sight, hearing, smell, taste, and feel are sacred.
Yet we have allowed our sacred senses, common sense included, to be eroded by mind control masked as a virus.
People's innate fear of the unknown, such as death, has been deliberately triggered by the media's bombardment of inflated virus death statistics.
Our brains autogenically freeze in fear, rendering us highly suggestible and easily led by so-called experts, fact-checkers, and self-appointed leaders as intended.
That's a really important point.
One of the things that happens in mind control Is that they put people through trauma, often horrific trauma, because when someone's in a traumatized state, it's well known in the mind control industry, they become more suggestible.
So I'll give you an example in Britain of how this works.
You get the chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, and the chief scientific advisor, Patrick Vallance, to come out at a press conference on one day, and they then tell you a horror story About the consequences that look like happening with the virus in terms of cases and deaths.
Figures, by the way, that were taken apart within 24 hours, but they come out and they say that.
What happens 24 hours later?
The political level of Johnson and the Health Secretary Pratt-Ancock.
They have a press conference and say that they're introducing more severe lockdown restrictions.
So what you've got is the first press conference is there to traumatize and the second press conference the following day is there to suggest.
And this is going on all the time.
You know, when you've got people like Professor Susan Mikey, who's not a medical person, but a psychologist, a behavioral psychologist and member of the British Communist Party, who is one of the major drivers and arguers for mandatory masks and even more severe lockdown restrictions than we currently have.
What the hell is going on?
What's going on?
We're in the middle of a mind control operation.
So, Cathy continues.
To compound the felony imposed upon us, people complied by wearing masks and, quote, sheltering at home, while their cities and livelihoods were destroyed.
This trauma heightened suggestibility even further, to the point where we froze in fear while our nation and its freedom were stolen from us.
Conditioned for generations to wait on big government to live our lives for us, we lost sight of the fact that Big Gov is comprised of the same deep state perpetrators hell-bent on ushering in their new world order, the Great Reset, through mass mind control.
The snare was set.
Knowledge, Cathy says, is our defense against mind control, hence all the censorship going on.
Knowledge is our defense against mind control, and our knowledge base has been deliberately altered by a handful of big guys operating on the philosophy that secret knowledge equals power.
This is the cult, hoarding the knowledge through the secret societies and keeping it from the public.
And she says here, take your mask off and breathe free.
Did you hesitate?
Did you choose sheltering in your mask like you choose sheltering at home while our country is stolen?
Since, quote, we're all in this together, would you take off your mask if everyone else did?
Media is not going to tell us to simultaneously take off our masks, so the choice is yours.
Do masks really filter out viruses?
No, they don't.
The holes are too big.
Or do they limit precious oxygen that our brains need to think clear and critically?
Why are the vast number of physicians who report prevention, cure and adverse effects of masks being silenced while self-appointed experts generate fear with lies?
Masks suppress speech, making muffled voices difficult to hear from six feet away.
Look around you and see who is conversing.
Remember when we would go into town and people would share smiles and information through talking and listening to each other.
When is the last time you have seen people shaking hands, hugging, laughing together in groups?
Since I recognize masks as mind control devices, from my experience in the Washington DC swamp under MK Ultra, I simply choose not to wear one.
Knowledge is our defense against mind control.
Reactions from others have always been positive, often inspiring them to remove their own mask to smile and converse.
Recently, I noticed my favorite scented flower hyacinth in the local grocery store and dashed over to bury my face in the fragrance.
As others removed their masks to smell the flowers too, their faces softened into smiles of cherished pleasure, as though they had forgotten how to breathe in and process scents.
And this is all part of the desensitization on multiple levels.
Of the human psyche and the human experience.
And she says, open your eyes to the reality that masks have compromised all of our sacred senses, especially common sense that comes from free thought.
You can say no to mind control, remove your sleep mask and begin freely living your life again.
Freedom is contagious.
And on this same theme...
Hundreds of Americans poisoned by hand sanitizer this month.
Wear your mask, sanitize your hands.
Oh, come on, little Johnny and little Mary, put your mask on and sanitize your hands, the government says.
More than half of hand sanitizers In this case, imported from Mexico, contain dangerous levels of toxic ingredients and should not be used by consumers, according to the US Food and Drug Administration.
In January alone, more than 900 accidental poisonings involving hand sanitizer were reported in the US, the overwhelming majority involving children.
The increased use of hand sanitizers has led to a surge in accidental poisonings, most involving children.
According to data from the National Poison Data System, there were 938 hand sanitizer exposure cases reported to the 55 US poison control centers during a 10-day period.
From January 1st to January 10th, a 57% increase on a year ago.
Of those cases, nearly 600 involved children aged five and younger.
The FDA for months...
We've covered this on davidike.com, has warned consumers that using a long list of hand sanitizer products containing methanol, calling them a serious safety concern that has led to blindness, hospitalizations, and death.
Methanol exposure can result in nausea, vomiting, headaches, blurred vision, seizures, coma, and permanent damage to the nervous system, the agency said.
And you go to a shop, you go to the doctor, you go to the dentist, and there is the sanitizer in the plastic bottle, which you are told, urged, or even ordered to use.
Come on, people!
What are we doing?
What they're doing is systematically deleting your self-respect and they sit around a table thinking, what can we make them do next?
What would they be stupid enough to allow us to do and tell them to do?
And that brings me to this.
China now using anal swab to test COVID. And when I saw that headline, I thought it was something to do with Klaus Schwab.
The co-founder of the World Economic Forum when I saw anal and swab in the same sentence, but apparently not.
China now using anal swab to test COVID. I can understand some confusion because the Chinese government is constantly talking out its arse, but There's a bigger reason for this, and it's on the theme that I'm talking about here.
China is not giving up on nasal or throat testing, but the country has adopted a new method for detecting the coronavirus, anal schwabs.
Anal testing is being used so far only on selected groups, maybe high-risk cases and people in quarantine.
Some people who have been subjected to anal testing include passengers arriving in Beijing and a group of more than 1,000 school children and teachers who were thought to have been exposed to the virus.
And what is this all about?
It's about deleting your self-respect.
Anal fricking swabs.
Deleting your self-respect.
Because once self-respect has gone, only submission remains.
That's where a lot of the ridiculous rules come in.
So we went to hospital yesterday because Gemma had a 12-week scan.
And so we turn up together.
Because obviously we're having a baby, so we've sort of been near each other at some point.
There's a separate waiting room.
So the mothers get carted off to a waiting room.
The men have to sit in another waiting room.
And they give you this device.
I'm sat there like, what is going on?
Looking at all the other dads that are, to be fair, just as confused as I am.
And then it buzzes.
So you then walk up.
You meet your wife again.
So that separation was worth it.
You walk in together.
And then as you walk in, she goes on the bed.
Obviously, there's the staff and there's a socially distanced chair so I don't have to sit next to Gemma.
Obviously, I've just sat down and moved my chair right forward because I want to see the screen.
But the idea that we have to be separated.
We live together. We're having a kid.
You know, by definition, we've been...
You know, obviously, closer than two metres apart at some point.
And it's just the ludicrousness of it.
So I was kind of laughing a bit, like, this is just freaking clown land.
But what got me is when we left, there was a couple who were slightly older than us, were just arriving.
And so she seemed quite nervous.
Hospitals aren't nice places anyway, especially when you're being prodded and poked, and they're certainly not nice at the moment.
So she always had a husband with her and she wanted a husband.
Oh, and the nurse said, well, this is like the 30-something week scan, isn't it?
So the lady said, yeah, it is, yeah. Well, he's not allowed in that one.
Right? So dads are allowed at the 12-week scan and they're allowed at the 20-week scan.
But then after that, they're not allowed in with their wives.
So he then just turned around and walked off back to his car.
So she went in nervously on her own.
And I'm just stood there like this.
And I just like, oh, I say this for lots of things.
But why? But why?
Explain that to me. So I can go to the 12-week scan.
I can go to the 20-week scan.
Bobby, you can't go to the 32-week scan or whatever it is.
But why? This is all part of the perception and psychological manipulation.
It's not meant to make sense.
It's made or meant not to make sense.
I've said this before.
If you...
If you can put out obvious contradictions, obvious stupid rules that make no sense, but people still follow them, then you are breaking down their self-respect and their resistance On a much more powerful and fundamental level than if you make at least your rules and regulations non-contradictory and making some kind of sense.
You make them make no sense and people still do it.
That's why when I go around and I go to places or shops or wherever and I see a situation that's ludicrous I have to point it out.
Because I'm not letting ludicrous merge into normal in my life.
When it's ludicrous, I'm calling it out.
I don't care where it is and I don't care who it is.
Because that way, you're holding on.
To a rationality that can easily be deleted when madness and insanity become normality, which is what they're trying to achieve and achieving with many people, absolutely, by putting out ridiculous, contradictory, nonsensical rules that people still follow.
It's so ridiculous.
Even in the summer when the pubs reopened, you know where people had to wear a mask into the pub or the restaurant and then they could sit down, take the mask off.
Talk in the room full of people all chatting for two hours, drinking beer.
And then, oh God, you better put that back on though if you stand up.
And I would sit there very rarely, to be fair.
I only went to the pub a couple of times over the summer because it wasn't a very nice experience, if I'm honest.
And you just sat there just looking at people and I just find like Jor on the floor a lot of the time.
And it's like, he's actually doing it.
He's actually doing it. Yeah, I've sat in cafes and restaurants and I've watched people outside the door Put their masks on, walk in, walk two strides to a table, sit down, take the mask off.
And then I've seen them put the mask on at the table when they're finished, walk two strides to the door, go through the door, and take the masks off.
Now, that is not human thinking.
That is a software program.
And that's what they're trying to make as a software program where they press enter, and we respond according to program.
And that's one reason why I call out the nonsense wherever I go when I see it, because I'm acknowledging it's nonsense, and it's not going to become part of my normal.
One of the people within Parliament, one of very few people that's actually called out the nonsense, is obviously Desmond Swain, and he's been getting both barrels from everyone over the last few days, because you can't possibly have people questioning the lockdown.
That's ridiculous. We can't allow that.
I saw that the Hate Not Hope lot had gone for him, and they've gone for Richie Allen, and I think it was Jewish Voice for Labour.
They've gone for him, using all the old anti-Semitism tricks, as usual.
And I was looking at it, and I was thinking, this is desperation now.
Because I was thinking, obviously, before Verona, you know, if you questioned Israel as if you spoke out on this, if you spoke on that, you've got these narrative manager groups, like Centre for Countering Digital Hate and that lot, that's basically Their job is to manage the narrative, but obviously they just sell themselves as an anti-hate group because that's their cover.
And I was thinking, this is interesting, actually, that they're just going for Swain.
In the same way the Centre for Accounting and Digital Hate are going for people that don't want the vaccine.
What's that got to do with hate?
What has me not wanting a vaccine got to do with hate?
What's Desmond Swain talking about lockdowns got to do with hate?
So it confused me at first.
These hate groups, anti-hate groups, are getting involved in it.
And then it made me think, Dad, like conspiracy theorists, the term does my head in, but it's, you know, people know it.
Have grown in popularity over the last year because they've been proved correct left, right and centre.
They said stuff in March, April, May, got laughed at, got, oh God, actually, that's real now.
And so actually...
They know that the government's lying to them.
They know that people like Ferguson are making shit up.
And these conspiracy theorists, nutbars, that spoke about the Great Reset and were laughed at by mainstream media, even when it was being advertised on the side of a bus shelter, are being proved correct.
And then I thought, actually, yes.
So if the public mind, all of a sudden, conspiracy theorists, stops being, oh, idiot, Tim Fullhat, And starts becoming, well, actually, that's a bit of a smear, really, because to be fair, he was right about X, Y, and Z, X, Y, and Z. People were then starting, well, what else was he right about?
What else was he right about?
And then it comes back to all that narrative managing they've done, whether it be Israel, whether it be Syria, weapons of mass destruction, whatever.
And it opens up a can of worms.
Well, they've gone for Desmond Swain because he's telling the truth.
I mean, I'm sure there are a lot of things as a Conservative Member of Parliament that I wouldn't agree with, that Swain maybe believes.
I don't know.
But what he's saying about lockdowns and what he's also saying about the fact that the case and death figures are being manipulated Is absolutely provable fact.
And because it's provable fact, he has to be silenced and demonized.
And you'll notice that he's being attacked from both main political parties.
He's being attacked by Johnson's, Jack Boot Johnson's Conservative Party in government.
But he's also being attacked by the...
The Labour Party, led by this totally inept Israel-firster Keir Starmer.
And you then got the network of so-called anti-hate groups That are also attacking him and they're using the anti-Semitism because that's the anti-Semitism industry.
It's not there to protect Jewish people.
It attacks Jewish people more vehemently than anyone else when they step out of line.
It's there to silence the exposure of the agenda.
And this answers your question.
About why an anti-hate group or an anti-Semitism group would suddenly be targeting people like Swain and people who are questioning the vaccine and the lockdowns.
It's because those groups are not there specifically to promote anti-hate.
Notice they don't promote love.
They promote anti-hate, which is, as anyone could see, another form of hate.
Anyway, what they're there for is like the heads coming up in the...
Amusement arcade game and you've got the hammer and you're trying to keep their heads down.
They're doing that for anyone that is exposing any element of this cult agenda.
So if you're exposing Israel, actually not Israel, but those that control Israel, which is a different thing, then you are an anti-Semite.
If you are challenging BLM, the organization, and the impositions of transgender activists on the rights of women, you are a hate merchant.
So they'll attack you on that basis.
But then, this virus pandemic hoax was played, and lockdown is crucial.
To destroying the global economy and independent livelihoods to make people dependent on the state.
And so if you then challenge lockdown, these groups that up to this point have been challenging people on the basis of hate and racism and all this, they suddenly start attacking them and trying to demonize them for challenging lockdown or challenging and questioning the COVID fake vaccine.
It's not even a vaccine. And the reason is they're not there and never were to stop hate.
I mean, they're purveyors of hate.
They want to get people to hate their targets.
They're there to stop any element of the agenda.
And now they're moving around from hate to anti-vaxxers, as they call them, and so on.
It's all part of a gigantic web because, you know, as...
We've shown in postings on davidike.com and video interviews that you've done with researchers like Dino, the web connections across the Atlantic between North America and Britain and Europe of these so-called anti-hate groups, which are now attacking people like Swain for exposing the lies of COVID. They're all connected, and they're working as one unit.
Many of the people within them won't realise that, but those at the core will.
And that's what makes me laugh about that, because obviously you've got Centre Accounting Digital Hate, you've got Hope Not Hate, all these laughs.
They're all Labour-affiliated, basically, so they're sat on that side of politics.
So if they were genuine, so they're genuine, hate the Tories, bloody Tories, nasty, you've got Swain calling out the Tories.
He's calling out the Johnson government for lying.
He's calling out Hancock for lying and manipulating things and doing this and that.
Yet those so-called leftist groups are going for him.
So it's a one-party state.
It just shows it.
Yeah, because this is a point I've been making for so long.
They're not there for party political reasons.
The party political system is just a sleight of hand to give the impression to people, not that many hold on to that anymore, that they've got choice in who is in government.
They haven't. It's a one-party state.
They're there to silence people who are exposing the agenda, which is operating through both major parties, as it is through the Republicans and the Democrats in America.
And so Swain's crime is calling the agenda out of lockdown and manipulated statistics.
The fact that he's a conservative calling out the Conservative Party, which the Labour Party would, you would think, support, is irrelevant because calling out the Conservative Party is not anything like The most important thing to these people and these groups and this network.
It's stopping anyone calling out the agenda.
And I would just say, you know, as we finish, that one of the things that people, not least in the media, the few who've started to question lockdown, question what's going on, what they need to do is break out of the straightjacket Within which they live of perception.
And stop asking, why would they want lockdowns?
Why are they going to these extremes?
Why would they do this?
Why would they do that?
And seeing everything in isolation.
And break out of the mind prism.
And see how the dots connect.
This is a global agenda being orchestrated through all the different countries, not really.
And that's why everywhere around the world, virtually with a few exceptions, is responding and has responded since the turn of 2020 in the same way, with the same consequences.
Of destroyed livelihoods, destroyed lives.
Mandatory masks.
Rolling out the vaccine.
Fake vaccine.
They're all doing the same thing at the same time because it's globally coordinated to a specific outcome.
And until even those in the media, the few who are questioning what's going on at some level, until they break out of that mind prison, seeing everything as like Johnson and this country and In America, seeing it as America, it's a global agenda for a global transformation of human society.