Jan. 29, 2021 - David Icke
18:56
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| ♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ | |
| ♪♪♪ When the World Health Organization is openly admitting now, | |
| because they've got no choice, that they have a problem with it, | |
| what... | |
| And then you go, okay, and it's there on the TV. We've had 100,000 deaths, bollocks, but we've had 100,000 deaths, asterisks, of any cause within 28 days, which is actually 60 days since August, of positive COVID diagnosis. | |
| So it's not even a test. Sometimes it can just be a doctor's diagnosis, put it on your chart. | |
| Those two things, if you're a journalist, which within the mainstream you're not, because it's an oxymoron, you would look at those two things and go, that's huge. | |
| Let's report on that. And if you looked into the PCR test, you'd go back to this fellow Drosten, where it all comes back from Germany. | |
| And people don't even seem to know who this guy is, Dad. | |
| Yeah, well, I've got some information on Drosten, and this is pivotal. | |
| Because the whole foundation of the COVID hoax is three things. | |
| Well, two things, but expressed in three ways. | |
| The PCR test that's not testing for the virus. | |
| but is picking up genetic material of many and various kinds in the samples and pinging positive not for a virus but for genetic material which is naturally in the body and that's what gives them their cases which they then justify imposing fascism To meet the runaway cases of the alleged COVID-19. | |
| Then you have the death certificates, which are, again, founded on the test. | |
| Because if you test positive, then 28 days, et cetera, et cetera, you die of any other cause, you become a COVID death. | |
| And the third point in this scam, the third pillar, if you like, Is the claim that asymptomatic people, I have nothing wrong with them, can pass on what's not wrong with them to other people, which is the absolute foundation of justifying lockdown. | |
| If they hadn't claimed, with no evidence by the way, that people with no symptoms could pass on the quote virus, they would have no foundation for locking everybody down. | |
| And so you come back To where did this PCR protocol for deciding that someone's got the virus, where did it come from? | |
| Well, first of all, the PCR test course itself was created in the 1980s by Kerry Mullis, who said publicly it cannot test for infectious disease. | |
| So why are they using it? | |
| Because it's a scam. | |
| And so that brings us to Drosten. | |
| He has a real history, which I'm going to go through some highlights of it. | |
| He's a German virologist and he became a, quote, star of the COVID pandemic and came out with a protocol using the PCR test to test for SARS-CoV-2. | |
| And so it goes back to him and a few people around him that developed the means by which fantastic numbers of people worldwide could test positive for a virus they don't even have. | |
| And he came out in January 2020, right at the time, perfect time, with this protocol. | |
| It was not peer-reviewed. | |
| They say it was peer-reviewed in 24 hours. | |
| In other words, it wasn't. | |
| But immediately, the Gates voice box, head of the World Health Organization, Ted Ross, recommended this Drosten protocol to everyone around the world to test for who had the virus and who didn't. | |
| And on davidhack.com this week, We posted a transcript of a German TV documentary, if you like, and the headline was this, Secret File on Christian Drosten. | |
| The German virologist who is responsible for the PCR test COVID protocol that has been producing fake positives, fake cases across the world since January 2020 used to justify global fascism. | |
| It's no surprise that a prominent German lawyer is pursuing a class action lawsuit against Drosten for crimes against humanity along with Tedros. | |
| The cohort that sold it to the world. | |
| So I'm going to pick out some highlights from this documentary. | |
| It was Christian Drosten who in January 2020 developed the PCR test for corona, which became the standard method for detecting the COVID-19 coronavirus worldwide. | |
| He's a very influential advisor to the German federal government and has participated as an expert at numerous government press conferences. | |
| He must be telling the truth then. | |
| His evaluation has thus had a decisive influence on important political decisions, such as compulsory wearing of masks, the interruption of regular education, and the closure of all cafes, bars, and restaurants. | |
| And what it does, first of all, and this will recall, in people's minds, a bloke in Britain called Professor Neil Ferguson, who produced the ludicrous, intelligence-insulting computer models that justified the first lockdown with hysterical claims about the number of deaths that would happen in America, Britain and other countries if lockdown didn't happen. | |
| So, The reason it will remind you of Ferguson is this, Christian Drosten and his false predictions, brackets C, Ferguson. | |
| 2003, SARS. He said, if the epidemic cannot be postponed in the near future, it is possible that there will always be new cases of SARS. If lung diseases of this kind were to break out regularly in some countries, this could have serious effects on their economies. | |
| An effective vaccine can be expected in one or two years at the earliest. | |
| And what turned out, since the beginning of the so-called SARS epidemic, 2003, there have only been 8,096 cases worldwide and 774 deaths, and that's if you believe what they're telling you. | |
| Had a total of nine cases of SARS and not a single death. | |
| And one of the things about Drosten is, again, see Bill Gates, is that his answer to everything, all these different things that come up, is vaccine, vaccine, vaccine. | |
| So his next forecast came in 2009. | |
| And it was swine flu. | |
| It is a widespread viral infection with side effects far more severe than anyone could imagine from the most dangerous vaccine. | |
| In other words, it doesn't matter about vaccine safety because it won't be as bad as the virus. | |
| Although there are no reliable indications of the number of people who are ill, Drosten urged people to get vaccinated against swine flu. | |
| You see the recurring theme. | |
| And what actually happened? | |
| The prophesied epidemic never happened. | |
| In spite of this, Western governments brought vaccines for several hundred million euros, which the vast majority of the population refused despite Drosten's insistent recommendations. | |
| What's more, the vaccines cause far more serious damage than swine flu itself. | |
| And the documentary says Drosten's frightening predictions Which always aims to impose the standard vaccine solution, turned out to be fatal errors of assessment resulting in enormous economic damage. | |
| Hello, present situation not accepted. | |
| How is it possible that Drosten, with his multiple horror predictions, continues to appear credible as the government advisor? | |
| Well, it is quite simple to answer that question. | |
| If you give the authorities what they don't want to hear, by telling them about a situation of health or whatever, that doesn't justify what the authorities want to do, then your career won't last very long as a government advisor. | |
| But you keep telling the authorities what they do want to hear so that they can justify what they want to do. | |
| And no matter how appalling your record of accuracy, you'll keep getting employed by the government. | |
| See Neil Ferguson. | |
| So then the documentary goes into major questioning of Christian Drosten and his alleged doctorate, and then comes to the PCR test itself. | |
| Christian Drosten and his PCR test for coronavirus. | |
| The PCR test for coronavirus developed in haste by Drosten in January 2020 for the detection of coronavirus as the quote test of the year. | |
| The results of this test are used by governments around the world to legitimize the most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against their citizens. | |
| As early as 2014, Drosten said about this PCR test method, the method is so sensitive that it can detect even a single molecule of the virus genome. | |
| If such a pathogen has, for example, spent one day on the nasal mucosa of a nurse without her getting sick or noticing anything, she suddenly becomes a case of, in this situation, MERS. And that, of course, is going against everything that the creator of the test, Kerry Mullis, said, which is it cannot detect infectious disease. | |
| So the question is asked, did Drosten choose this PCR method in a calculated way to trigger a test pandemic, which is what we had? | |
| Not a pandemic of a... | |
| A virus. Pandemic of a test. | |
| Not testing for a virus, but claim to. | |
| Ongoing scientific research by 22 top scientists reinforces this suspicion, it says, as it denies the scientific basis for Drosten's study, which served as the basis for the WHO's implementation of the test. | |
| Not connected at all. | |
| With his non-scientific study and his unsuitable PCR test based on it, one man played a decisive role in the whole coronavirus scenario, Christian Drosten. | |
| Not only him, but also the test he developed turns out to be not very credible under closer examination. | |
| You're not kidding. | |
| Now, Christian Drosten and his many links. | |
| It describes how he's linked to a guy called Olfert Lant and this chap is one of the regular co-authors of Drosten's studies and also this study involving the alleged coronavirus. | |
| In addition, this bloke, Land, is the owner of a Berlin-based biotech company which manufactures tests for the coronavirus. | |
| So he's coming out and doing the protocol and his mate is manufacturing the tests. | |
| Drosten and Lant seem to have discovered a successful business model. | |
| In the event of a pandemic and the emergence of the most diverse viruses, they jointly developed the corresponding PCR test. | |
| This was already the case in 2002-2003 for SARS, in 2011 for EHEC, in 2012 for MERS, in 2016 for Zika virus, in 2017 for yellow fever. | |
| The same pattern is still in place, which they have now also used for coronavirus. | |
| Lant admitted to a newspaper, a Berlin newspaper, the testing design and development came from the centre where Drosten works. | |
| We simply implemented it immediately in the form of a kit. | |
| And if we don't... | |
| Now, here's another major area. | |
| And if we don't have the virus... | |
| Which originally only existed in Wuhan. | |
| Even then, not in its natural form. | |
| Computer generated. | |
| We can make a synthetic gene to simulate the genome of the virus. | |
| They don't have a bloody virus! | |
| They've simulated one! | |
| Another foundation of the whole scam. | |
| That's what we did very quickly, said Drosten's mate. | |
| From the start of the coronavirus crisis, the Lant Biotech company was making test kits for 1,500,000 tests a week, and by February of 2020, it tripled its turnover. | |
| In the meantime, these tests have obviously brought in huge profits. | |
| It then goes on to talk about the big pharma cartel connections to Drosten, and then concludes this. | |
| Fatal erroneous predictions, numerous unqualified contradictions about his doctoral thesis, a hastily developed PCR corona test with fundamental scientific flaws and an unsuspected swamp of financial entanglements take away all credibility from Christian Drosten. | |
| If the key person at the center of the entire coronavirus crisis proves to be uncredible after closer examination, this raises serious questions. | |
| One, should we not finally, because of these non-scientific foundations, Analyze all the events linked to the coronavirus with the inescapable economic and financial collapse that threatens entire peoples to find those who are pulling the strings and profiting from this situation in the shadows. | |
| Two, could the aim not be a staging for a power grab and even under the pretext of fighting the pandemic lead to the setting up of digital surveillance of entire peoples? | |
| Well, big time yes to that. | |
| And three, why don't the mass media, which has the task of providing critical media coverage, reveal the Drosten dossier, but keep it under wraps? | |
| Because the mainstream media is owned by the same cult that is driving the virus hoax. | |
| And so here you have this central figure That's pivotal in everything that's happened since January 2020. | |
| No wonder he's being taken to court for crimes against humanity. | |
| And his credibility and background is extraordinary. |
Export Selection