All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 11, 2020 - David Icke
01:07:18
Lab Rats - That's All You Are If You Have The Vaccine - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the David Icke Dot
Connector video cast.
As a kid, I was never a massive fan of guinea pigs and as an adult, I don't really fancy being one.
How about you dad? No, and like you, I don't intend to be one.
But lab rats is what people are if they have this COVID vaccine.
And, of course, it's a time of great celebration in Britain because they're now rolling out this Pfizer vaccine and people are being injected with...
whatever they don't know to respond to a virus that's never been shown to exist and even if people believe it does the Infection, alleged infection to fatality ratio is absolutely tiny.
So obviously we desperately need this vaccine or rather the global cult needs it for other reasons, certainly not reasons of human health and reacting to a virus.
When I say lab rats, I mean exactly that.
Because we are told that the so-called Bloody so-called independent drug and vaccine regulator in Britain.
Actually an agency fundamentally connected to government that has taken money from the Gates Foundation and has people connected to Big Pharma on its board.
It's called the MHRA and it has given not approval for this vaccine but emergency approval because of course we're all in this A desperate situation where people are falling over in the street from this virus and therefore we have to ignore all safety checks and balances with this vaccine so that we can respond to this emergency.
And people, the lab rats, who are choosing to have this vaccine should know that actually the trial for its safety is supposed to last two years and only after two years can it possibly get official proper approval to be used and yet emergency approval has been given in literally a few months of completely inadequate and pathetic quote trials in which the data On which the emergency approval was given by the MHRA came from the vaccine company itself.
And we saw the lab rat nature of this vaccine within 24 hours.
Because what happened is that it was started in a ridiculous staged PR stunt, which we'll come to later.
And within 24 hours, two National Health Service workers had had a serious reaction, allergic reaction.
Because they suffer from an allergy.
And the MHRA, which 24 hours before said, oh, this vaccine's safe.
Been through all the chicks.
Issues are warning that people with significant allergies shouldn't have the vaccination.
So what What were they doing 24 hours before when they weren't making that warning and saying it was safe?
Because they're making it up as they go along because the idea is to get the vaccination inside everybody and damn the bloody consequences for health.
And I've got this article from the scientific journal Nature.
I was going through it and it's a very good guide, I suppose it's meant to be, but if you take the right bits it's a good guide to the fact that we are looking at human lab rats.
Not just in Britain, but all around the world as it is played out globally.
So this is what the article says.
It's about this, obviously, COVID vaccine.
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has passed safety and efficacy tests.
No, it bloody hasn't.
But researchers still have many questions about how this and other vaccines will perform as they're rolled out to millions of people.
Now, there's a sentence, Gaza, of total contradiction.
The vaccine has passed safety and efficacy tests, but researchers still have many questions about how this and other vaccines will perform as they're rolled out to millions of people.
Well, if you've still got those questions, you've not done the trial, have you?
With striking speed, the United Kingdom has become the first country to approve a COVID-19 vaccine that has been tested in a large clinical trial.
Nothing like large enough when you break it down.
Nothing like. On 2nd December, UK regulators granted emergency use authorisation to a vaccine from the drug firms Pfizer and BioNTech just seven months into clinical trials that have to run for two years to get anything like full permission, proper permission. So the article asked this question, do the vaccines prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2?
Surely that's going to be a major reason to have a vaccine if it could do that, according to the fact that it doesn't exist and has never been shown to exist.
But anyway, by their criteria, stopping the transmission must be why you have a vaccine.
But all three...
Have tested in all these trials, different vaccines, in large clinical trials, have shown promise in preventing disease symptoms, but not the transmission of the so-called disease.
Now, how do they know in these trials that it's shown promise in preventing disease symptoms?
Because they've been using the PCR test that's not testing for the bloody virus.
It goes on, but none have demonstrated that it prevents infection altogether or reduces the spread of the virus in a population.
So, what's the point?
Well, the point, of course, is nothing to do with human health.
Quite the opposite. So the article says, this leaves open the chance that those who are vaccinated could remain susceptible to a symptomatic infection, another scam, and could transmit that infection to others who remain vulnerable.
Point of the bloody vaccine, anybody?
So in the worst case scenario, said virologist Stephen Griffin at the University of Leeds, you have people walking around feeling fine, but shedding the virus everywhere.
And of course from that, oh, you've had the vaccine, but you still could spread it even though you've had the vaccine.
from that comes, oh, so we've got to keep wearing masks and social distancing, etc.
So, Pfizer has said that its scientists are looking into ways to assess virus transmission
in future studies, while the vaccine is being used on gathering numbers of people in Britain
every day.
you For now AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford might be able to provide first hints as to whether a vaccine can prevent such transmission.
Although they have yet to publish complete results their trial did routinely test participants for SARS-CoV-2 allowing investigators to track whether people became infected without developing symptoms.
And how did they assess whether they were infected or not?
The PCR test that's not testing for the virus.
How long, the question is asked, will vaccine induced immunity last?
There is no quick way to determine how long immunity to SARS-CoV-2 virus will last and researchers will need to monitor this closely in the coming months and years.
Yes, on the lab rats, Human lab rats that they are giving this vaccine to and ludicrously line up to have it given to them.
The major vaccine trials conclusions about effectiveness are drawn from fewer than 200 people who have developed the disease.
How do they know?
That fewer than those 200 people have developed the disease.
The PCR test that's not testing for the virus.
There are early indications that the three leading vaccines protect people over 65.
How do you know that? Well, the vaccine companies told us.
But researchers will probably need real-world data from large numbers of vaccinated people, lab rats, before they can get the demographic granularity necessary to ensure that parts of the population aren't left unprotected.
There are no data yet on how the vaccines fare in children and pregnant women.
The vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna rely on RNA encased in lipid nanoparticles that ferry it or them into cells.
And so lab rats again, they are using a form of vaccine which manipulates RNA, thus DNA, that have never been used on humans before.
Oh, I must get that vaccine.
It'll protect me from the virus.
Charlie Weller, head of vaccines at the biomedical research charity Welcome in London.
Every time I see Welcome or Welcome Trust, red lights flash all around me.
I don't know where they come from. He said, quote, robust surveillance with ongoing sampling and sequencing will be key to assessing any potential impact on public health and picking up any mutations, as will the continued research in developing the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines.
So Charlie, it says she here, so Charlie must be a woman.
First of all, continued research in developing the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines.
This first one is already two.
Two jabs. And as I've been saying since March, the plan will be that they'll say, oh, it's mutating and you've got to keep having this.
COVID vaccine year on year on year.
And cumulatively, that is going to transform the human body, as I've talked about elsewhere.
But this is the other thing, Gaz, when we're talking about lab rats, human lab rats.
Robust surveillance with ongoing sampling and sequencing will be a key to assessing any potential impact on public health So what have you approved it for if you've not done that in the trials?
How will scientists monitor for long-term safety concerns?
And this is a lady called June Rain.
She's chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the MHRA. See above.
Who says the public safety has always been at the forefront of our minds, she said, crossing her fingers behind her back.
And she said this in a statement that accompanied the UK announcement that it had approved the Pfizer vaccine.
It says here in this article, the vaccine has completed only a few months of a two-year clinical trial that it will need to complete before it is approved to be sold freely on the market.
But I'll just roll it out to British people and everyone else around the world.
Not a problem. As a result, health officials, clinicians and people receiving the vaccine will be watching closely for as yet unobserved signs of danger.
Bloody lab rats, people!
Clinical trials vet vaccines rigorously.
Comedy club.
For potential side effects with a combination of self-reporting from participants and data collection by clinicians.
But now we have a trial continuing with the population in general.
Lab rats, like I say.
And they also say, Gazza, that they need to track vaccine recipients to see what the effects are.
They're saying that.
Lab rats. And having said all of that, these companies have been given immunity from prosecution.
So no matter what these vaccines do to you people, it's going to cost the manufacturers not a single cent in compensation.
And two other things on this subject, Gazza, before I come back to you.
UK to use AI for COVID-19 vaccine side effects.
So, the MHRA that has given emergency approval after a pathetically short trial Not even a trial.
Who say the vaccine is safe or it's safe.
They have employed the same organization.
They have employed a software company called Genback UK and paid them £1.5 million for an AI tool that will be used to process the adverse reactions of the COVID-19 vaccines.
The Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority, MHRA, has paid Genpac UK a tender of £1.5 million to develop an AI tool to sift through the high volume of reports of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
The government contract states that the AI tool will process the expected high volume.
The government contract states That the AI tool will, quote, process the expected high volume of COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions, ADRs. This is the vaccine that the MHRA independent regulator has said is safe.
While paying this company one and a half million pounds to track adverse reactions which it says are expected to be of high volume.
What was one of these videocasts called a couple of weeks ago?
New definition of insanity having the Gates vaccine.
So the types of vaccine being developed, such as mRNA and Chimpanzee Edenovirus, are relatively new, making it hard to predict how they will interact with millions of people's immune systems.
Lab rats!
The contract from MHRA also concedes that the timelines of the coronavirus vaccine has been accelerated so fast that an accurate analysis of their safety may not be available when they start to be trialed in national immunization campaigns.
Anyone considering having this vaccine, for them, I'll just read that again.
The contract from MHRA also concedes that the timelines of the coronavirus vaccine have been accelerated so fast that an accurate analysis of their safety may not be available when they start to be trialed in national immunization campaigns.
Well, they don't need to tell the two NHS workers who had that allergic reaction.
That that's the case because they experienced it.
A COVID-19 vaccine will only be deployed once it has been proven safe and effective.
Bollocks! Through robust clinical trials and approved for use by the appropriate licensing authority.
Bloody lie. And just to complete this sequence, Gazup, I mentioned earlier this MHRA, which is the so-called independent body, government body, that takes money from Gates, etc.
Here's three of its board members.
Stephen Lightfoot, he's the chair, became so on 1 September 2020.
Having been a non-executive director of the agency since September 2015.
His most recent executive roles were general manager of the global pharmaceutical diagnostics business of GE Healthcare.
He's also been managing director of a UK pharmaceutical business and a UK pharmaceutical and medical device business.
There's another one, Amanda Calvert.
Calvert spent 28 years in the life sciences sector working for ICI, Zeneca and AstraZeneca, where she held senior operational roles across a wide range of business functions.
She led major change programs, including setting up a global IT function and investment program to support pharmaceutical operations and manufacturing.
And then there is Anthony Rogers, who also worked for AstraZeneca.
Amanda Calvert and Anthony Rogers are shareholders still, according to official documents, of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
And Lightfoot, the chair, was at least at one point a shareholder in the giant vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline.
So, can anyone explain to me, they won't be able to, How you can have shareholders in pharmaceutical companies on independent pharmaceutical regulators making decisions about those companies.
Like I say new definition of insanity.
Having the Gates vaccine.
It is mad, the whole vaccine stuff.
I've watched it play out over the last couple of days and it is insanity.
And this is the thing, I have very little sympathy now really.
Because we're in the information age and this information is everywhere.
You've just read it out. I've seen it.
It's everywhere. So if you can read this information and still go ahead and go, yeah, yeah, that'd be fine, stick it in my arm, then I don't really care, to be honest, fill your boots.
If you're that idiotic, then that's, you know, do you know what I mean?
That's like stepping out in front of a car and that's your problem.
The one good news of the fact that they're openly admitting that they don't know if it will stop transmission Is that that whole kind of, well, you're not getting the vaccine for you, you're getting it to protect others, is out the window.
So I don't have to get it then.
So that's fine. So that's good.
So I'm happy with that. Because I'm very much, you do you, hun.
If you want to get it, go fill your boots, mate.
But at least now I know that I don't have to.
So that's great news. So I'll have a drink tonight to celebrate that.
When you were talking about, obviously, those two NHS workers...
It was interesting, actually, because I messaged you this in the week.
So I had a friend come round, and he said to me, he goes, oh, sorry I'm late.
He was coming round to look at the kitchen.
He said, oh, I'm sorry I'm late, mate.
He said, it's been an absolute nightmare at home.
So his wife works in a pharmacy department of a hospital in the Midlands.
And they're supposed to have, and I didn't know this, a resuscitation area set up next to where they deliver the vaccines.
So it must be safe then. Do you know what I mean?
If you've got to have a resus area set up.
And they didn't have one set up.
And two members of the public keeled over and went down after taking the vaccine.
Had to be rushed up and treated up in the A&E and stuff.
So I was saying to him, I'll keep refreshing the news.
I'll wait to see that. You're obviously not going to see it.
So I messaged him the next day and I was like, nothing in the news.
He said, no. He said, but someone was outside with a megaphone from 8pm last night screaming about it.
So I don't know if they're related to To the two people that keeled over or whatever, but screaming to the rooftops with a megaphone about the fact that this is happening.
So fingers crossed, Dad, that this is actually going to come out because this will be happening all over the country.
Yes, it will.
And of course it will.
And the other aspect of this, Gaz, is the question of sterilization.
By the vaccine. We kind of went into it relatively briefly last week, but let's have a closer look.
COVID vaccine is female sterilization, says the former head of Pfizer Research.
The vaccine contains a spike protein.
Now, I've heard this Pronounced in different ways, syncytin and syncytin, or syncytin and syncytin.
I'll go with syncytin.
So the vaccine contains a spike protein called syncytin-1, which is vital for the formation of human placenta in women.
If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response against that spike protein, we are also training the female body to a tax inciting one, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration, potentially permanently.
And this is the opinion of Dr.
Michael Yeadon and Dr.
Wolfgang Wodarg.
So on December the 1st of this year, the former FISA head of respiratory research, Dr.
Michael Yeadon, And the lung specialist and German politician, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, filed an application with the European Medicine Agency responsible for the EU-wide drug approval and the vaccine and vaccine studies, etc., for the immediate suspension of Of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNTech or BioNTech Pfizer study, that's the vaccine that's being pumped into British people as I speak.
The petitioners demand that due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, that the results are obviously going to be flawed of these trials, because they're testing with a test that's not testing for the virus.
On the basis of many different PCR tests, these two experts say, of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with a necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.
That is some of the things they say.
The formation of so-called non-neutralizing antibodies can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with a real infection.
Vaccine is supposed to be protecting them against.
And this is the difference between neutralizing antibodies, which stop the infectious agent doing its worst, and non-neutralizing antibodies, which don't do that.
And what they're saying is any vaccine that produces these non-neutralizing antibodies, oh look, they've got antibodies, it works, is very potentially, and in tests has shown to be the case, going to make the effect of the real infectious agent far, far worse on the person Who has produced, thanks to the vaccine, these non-neutralizing antibodies.
They say it must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against inciting one, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
comment?
The much too short duration of the study, they say, does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects.
Well, of course it doesn't by definition.
As in narcolepsy, which is a brain malfunction that makes people just fall asleep, In narcolepsy cases, after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow, which is exactly what is happening in Britain that have given approval already.
And then we come to this.
We mentioned this last week, but it's very relevant in the context of what we're talking about here.
The UK government on its website put out a document, basically a guide to health workers about this vaccine.
And it's kind of strange because this document doesn't have any heading on it, like this is from so-and-so.
But it uses American spellings, like immunization with a Z instead of the British spelling of an S. And it uses American phrases, which you don't see in British documents.
But anyway, this is the kicker, this.
It says it is unknown This is the vaccine that people are getting now.
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA vaccine has an impact on fertility.
Word for word in the document.
Fertility. It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.
Lab rats. And when you look at what I've been saying in my books over the years about the plan to sterilize the human population in terms of the body type we have now as part of a depopulation agenda, the fact that we're now looking at doctors and Saying, well, hold on a minute.
This could affect development of the placenta and make women infertile.
And the fact that an official document on the British government website says, well, we don't know the impact on fertility of this vaccine.
Should have big red flags and bright flashing red lights everywhere.
And what are you doing, people, having this bloody vaccine?
I mean, how much evidence do you want?
I have to call you up on a hate crime there, Dad.
You said placenta in women.
So I'm pretty sure it's placenta in people.
So I just want to get that out of the way early doors.
Yeah, apology accepted.
Yeah. It does stagger me.
Like you're saying there, like, what are you doing, people?
And, like, you have these conversations with people where you're saying, you know, that there's an absolute scammer for, you know, we're living in a fascist society.
What on earth is going on? And people are just like, oh, for goodness sake, you know, tinfoil hat and all that, you know, nonsense.
But if you break it down, so you go, okay, so I'm in my 30s.
Late 30s. I'll break it down.
So I have, by their own statistics, say the virus is real, it exists, blah, blah, blah.
I have a 0.004% chance of dying if I get it.
Right. Okay. So I have to get a vaccine that you don't know if it will work and admit that.
You don't know if it will make me infertile.
And you admit that. It hasn't been fully tested, and you admit that because you're saying it's a few months into a two-year trial.
You have to have a resuscitation area next to me when you're giving it to me, right?
And I can't have my life back unless I have it.
If you break that down, can you explain?
Am I, I don't know, is it a tinfoil hat?
Because it seems mental to me, and I can't understand how people can't see that.
It's staggering. Well, no, it's not crazy, and it's not a tinfoil hat.
We live in a world of complete inversion.
Everything's upside down.
So when you research something, question something, and come up with an obvious situation that you're looking at, which is not what you're being told by government you're looking at, That is crazy and insane and it's paranoia.
But if you just take what governments and authorities and their various forms tell you to believe and you just believe it, then that is crazy.
Living in the real world.
That's being normal.
That's being intelligent.
So we live in this topsy-turvy, upside-down world, wherever you look.
And this global cult that I've been exposing all these decades actually is, from its foundation, an inversion.
Everything it does is an inversion.
And what are lies?
They are inversions of the truth.
And so anybody connected to this cult is going to be a genetic liar because they are an inversion of everything that's true.
It's not an accident that satanic groups...
Satanic covens that ultimately connect, certainly the major ones, into this global cult, which is actually a death cult.
It's no accident that they have in their symbolism language inversion.
Look at the pentagram.
And it's a five-pointed star.
But how does Satanists depict it?
Inverted. This is where you get the inversion in Satanism of the cross.
It's not to do, actually, with Christianity.
It's to do with an inversion of everything.
So their symbols are upside down.
The Nazi symbol of the swastika was also twisted around, compared with how it's used in other forms and other places.
Everything's an inversion.
And this means that all the time, wherever we look in terms of authority, cult-controlled authority, you're looking at lies in versions of the truth.
Now, how do you defend lies?
Which are able to be exposed as lies.
Well, first of all, you have massive numbers of the population programmed to believe whatever authority says.
So if anyone is challenging what authority says, it must, by definition, not be true.
Thus, you defend your lies to unthinking people in that way.
But the other thing that you're faced with is thinking people.
People who are, never more so than in 2020, who are questioning what they're being told.
So how do you defend lies from them?
Well, what you do is you censor the truth.
The only way you can protect lies is to censor the truth.
Enter Facebook this very week.
Covid vaccine.
Facebook to ban anti-vax conspiracy theories.
Conspiracy theory, definition, anything the government doesn't want you to believe.
Facebook is updating its policies around the coronavirus by removing false claims about upcoming vaccines.
Who says they're false claims?
Well, Facebook does.
That which controls Facebook does, and it's not Zuckerberg.
Little boy in a t-shirt.
Although he's a facilitator of fascism, and like all the others, like Wojcicki at YouTube, they need to go to jail eventually for a very long time, i.e.
the rest of their bloody life.
The social media giant will be monitoring for misinformation, see above, that has been debunked by public health experts on both its main app and Instagram.
Now let's just analyze that.
The social media will be monitoring misinformation, anything the government doesn't want you to believe, that has been debunked by public health experts.
The public health experts who have lied to you throughout 2020 are also the arbiters of what is true and not true in relation to people questioning the lies of public health experts.
It's called dystopia.
We have a Facebook official, a faceless Facebook official.
This misinformation could include false claims about the safety, efficacy, ingredients or side effects of the vaccines.
Well, how about what I've been saying since this video began?
Oh no, that's misinformation.
Why? Of course the government says so.
For example, we will remove false claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain microchips, nano microchips actually.
So how do you know they don't?
Government says so.
Or anything else that isn't on the official vaccine ingredient list.
And so it goes on.
And this is why the censorship has become so insane and extreme.
Because they're defending a narrative that a child could take apart.
And the only way they're going to do that is by censoring those that are taking it apart.
I was expecting you to say Imran Ahmed was quoted then, because they're wheeling him out everywhere at the minute, aren't they?
Anything vaccine related, because, you know, an ex-banker is obviously, you know, pretty knowledgeable on vaccines.
The other thing in terms of censorship...
Say that again?
Bad pronunciation. What was?
Oh, what, me saying banker?
Good one. Yeah, I was a bit slow on the uptake there, Dad.
Sorry, mate. The other thing that's happened this week, another way, obviously, that you can silence the truth is by killing those that are saying it.
And Brandy Vaughan was found dead this week.
I don't know anything other than her young son found her, but she had put out things on her social media saying that
she feared something like this would happen and that she wasn't
having any suicidal thoughts, she wasn't ill and there were no
problems on her end.
So it'd be interesting to see what more comes out about that. But Brandy's obviously a very prominent
anti-vaxxer as they say, who worked within the industry and then turned whistleblower. We've shared quite a lot of her
stuff over the years on DavidIke.com That's another way that they do it, isn't it dad?
Well, as I've said many times,
to grasp what's going on, people need to grasp the
level of pure evil that we're dealing with.
You know, this cult is, I don't call it a death cult for effect, because that's what it is.
You see, I mentioned earlier about everything the cult does being an inversion.
And part, fundamental part, of that inversion is Is that it's an inversion of life.
And so it's obsessed with death.
That's why it does all these death rituals.
To this cult, a war, especially a world war, is a death ritual to them.
Because they're obsessed with death.
You know, you see Satanists doing rituals in churches and churchyards.
It's because they're obsessed with death.
It's an inversion. And so they're anti-life.
By the way, people, they're anti-life and they are behind the vaccines that so many people are planning to have.
Worth a thought.
And Brandy Vaughan is a phenomenal example of the guts of The determination and the sheer humanity that is necessary to challenge this.
Because, as you say, she was working in the big pharma arena.
And she realized from her direct experience that big pharma is freaking evil.
And is not in the least interested in human health and well-being, quite the opposite.
Even on one level, it's only interested in money, but you go deeper into the web and it's more than money.
It's about human control and human destruction.
And people say, well, why would they be so anti-human?
Why would they want to destroy humans?
Well, see my books over the last 30 years, and you'll see that at the core of this cult, they are not human.
And that's why they are so anti-human and want to destroy humanity as we know it.
So Brandy saw what went on.
Now, at best, at best, most people would just walk away.
And they'd keep their head down and they'd say, well, at least I'm not going to play a part in it anymore.
But not Brandy Vaughan.
She not only walked away, she started being incredibly vocal and articulate.
About the truth of the motivations, techniques of Big Pharma.
And not least in the area of vaccines.
And I never spoke to her and never met her, but she seemed to be an incredibly nice human being.
And suddenly, as this vaccine, which of course she was vehemently against, was being rolled out in Britain and plans around the world, of course, let's say that Brandy Vaughan was suddenly no longer with us.
And I watched her videos about how she was being intimidated, how people were breaking into her house and doing things that just made her know that they'd been there.
All intimidation.
And we're talking, you know, I mean, serious...
intelligence people because the intelligence networks fuse into big pharma.
It's all one web. That's why at the core they're all the same web.
And It stinks to high heaven.
Of course it does. And I'll be very interested to see how they explain the death of Brandy away.
Because she was a young woman.
She was not elderly in the last years of life.
And I'll be very interested to see how they explain it away.
And I'm sure, however they explain it away, will be another expression of inversion.
Better known as lying through your bloody teeth.
The thing is, you have this evil web at its core, and then obviously as it comes out, they have their actors that stand for elections and whatever.
Talking of acting, Dad, Matt Hancock is not an actor, is he?
It's some of the worst acting I've ever seen.
Honestly, I couldn't believe what I was watching.
Well, Matt Hancock, for people around the world, if they haven't seen it, is the health secretary in Britain.
He's not really.
He's a script reader.
The whole thing's being orchestrated by people who've never seen a ballot box in their life from the background.
They orchestrate the script through Johnson, the Prime Minister, and through Hancock, the health secretary.
You know, we have this...
I don't know how far it goes around the world, but we have this word in Britain called a prat.
And if ever that word, prat, kind of means idiot.
We've not come across it around the world.
If ever the word prat was coined for a single human being, it's Matt Hancock.
And... What he did this week, just as the first vaccinations were being done, is he went on a ludicrous program called Good Morning Britain, which is fronted up by this, well, again, the word Pratt is very relevant, again, called Piers Morgan.
People in America will remember him replacing Larry King on CNN and Basically demolishing the audience.
Well, he's still doing television programs now like Good Morning Britain and he was interviewing Matt Hancock and they played a clip of someone being vaccinated and he came back and Hancock's, as you say, pathetic attempt at appropriately named Crocodile Tears Because, oh, he was so overcome.
And Morgan comes in and says, oh, you seem to be very emotional.
Well, any practice, he wasn't emotional at all.
He started laughing then.
In my youth, when I was a great...
A great lover of Motown and that kind of music.
There was a song by Smokey Robinson called Tracks of My Tears.
Well, Tracks of My Tears, brackets, there aren't any.
Would be very appropriate to what we saw with Matt Hancock.
And see, these people are psychopaths.
Psychopaths find it very difficult to fake emotion.
Some of them do.
Some of them try. But...
They're not very good at it.
And you can see through it because they don't have this empathy.
They don't have this compassion, which allows true emotion to be expressed.
I mean, look at Tony Blair.
He was infamous for his fake emotion.
And with Tony Blair, it has to be fake because of the nature of who he is.
And, you know, this whole...
The launch of the vaccine.
I mean, you just see the PR people sitting around the table.
First of all, the first person to get it was a supposedly 90-year-old, very nearly 91-year-old lady who looked amazingly young for a 91-year-old, but she got it.
And you had this picture.
What they did is, as they were wheeling her in a wheelchair to have this first vaccine, great fanfare, all these NHS workers and nurses were lining the corridor, clapping, right?
This woman going to have the first vaccine.
So let's just break this down.
They were clapping.
Because a 1991 year old, they say, of age, was about to get the first untested, emergency approved, no idea what it's going to do, vaccine.
And I have to say, I really don't want that kind of people being involved in my healthcare.
Thank you very much. And then you had the second one, who was a bloke in his 80s, called William Shakespeare, who lived about 20 miles, or lives about 20 miles from Stratford-upon-Avon.
And, you know, you can see the PR people going, we need someone to stand out, you know.
William Shakespeare, we'll have him.
They're just using these people as PR props.
To sell an untested vaccine, it's so pathetic to behold.
My suspicious mind, like Elvis, says they probably didn't even get the vaccine because it would be too much of a PR risk if they whack it in the lady and then she keels over.
And I don't think they'd take that risk.
I mean, I have no evidence for that.
That's just my opinion, but I just don't think they would.
It's interesting you said how young she looked because I couldn't stop looking at her arm.
And I was thinking, right, so she's 91.
Her arm has more skin elasticity than mine.
And I was looking at her going, that's not a 91-year-old woman's arm.
But there you go. Just very quickly, I agree with you on that possibility.
Because they don't want to take chances.
I mean, you see the bad publicity that got when the National Health Workers went down with those allergies.
So they are very, very careful that they don't want a PR disaster.
And if anything happened to these two people, William Shakespeare and the lady, As a result of having the vaccine, well, obviously, the PR disaster doesn't even cut it.
So, yeah, I think there's a very good chance that some shenanigans were going on there to make sure that that didn't happen.
It is interesting because, like...
I've said, well, we've had these conversations, obviously, for a year, but I've said, like, they're trolling us.
They are. Like, they just leave little things that you can see.
And it's like, William Shakespeare, really?
The man who wrote All the World to Stage, and we're merely players.
Yeah, him. Okay.
It's almost like it's a little wink.
And also, when they wheeled out the 25-year-old, 91-year-old...
As you see it, the thing.
She's there like that, giving it the Merkle.
Like that. She sat there.
I'm thinking, who sits in a wheelchair giving it the Merkle symbol?
Do you know what I mean? And I looked at that and I thought, oh, it's just trolling.
It's trolling. Yeah, but that's a good point because I've written in the books over the years about how they put their symbolism.
Some of it's, like you say, even joke symbolism.
They have their own language of symbols, but I mean, to give the second vaccine ever to a bloke called William Shakespeare, that's symbolism.
It's not just a symbol you see.
Things that they do are symbolic.
And people within the cult, within the know, would see the symbolism of things like that, whereas, of course, the general population wouldn't.
No. I saw it straight away.
But I must admit, this then comes back to the fact that Facebook is censoring everything.
A lot of people noticed it.
And I understand I probably am in a bit of an echo chamber in the sense of people that I follow and people that follow me are quite like-minded.
So I'm more likely to see these things on my timeline.
But there was a lot of people saying, this is nonsense.
And even people, to be fair, that aren't really into this sort of stuff and aren't going, William Shakespeare, really?
Really? And so that's quite encouraging, Dad.
I've seen quite a lot of encouraging things lately, I have to say.
Namely, the second lockdown.
And certainly where I am up here in Derbyshire, no one went along with it.
Absolutely no one went along with it.
And people are seeing these things and going, yeah, I don't know, I don't know.
There are some really good things going on, Gaz.
And in entering the room, And putting themselves on public display to anyone with brain cell activity on public display.
They have woken up a lot of people.
They didn't really want to wake up.
So there are some very, very good things going on.
And while we are and we should expose what the cult is doing and how it works, And where it's planning to head.
We should not forget that while 2020 has been a nightmare year in so many ways with the unfolding fascism around the world, it's also woken a lot of people up.
And we just need to get that awakening perception of the world to stage two, which is not cooperating.
With that world any longer.
And when we get enough people doing that, then the house of cards will fall.
I think we're getting there, Dad.
I honestly do.
I really do. And I know they're going to...
Give us some crumbs at Christmas and then, I imagine, shut the whole country down again and blame it on, you know, you went round Granny's house.
But I don't think people are going to comply.
I really don't because, I mean, you're going to get a few idiots, you know, the 20 mask brigade.
You're going to get them, but they're lost.
They're done. Anyway, but I think people are going to be at a point, and a lot of people are already at a point where Well, what's the point?
Because I'm done anyway.
Like, my business is done. If I don't open, I'm done.
So, what's the point?
I may as well risk it.
I may as well risk it for a fine, because I'm done anyway.
And the more people that do that, the more people that open, because that's the thing, like we've said, there's three, well, there were three pubs in my village.
There's now two left, probably not after Christmas anyway.
One went under in the first lockdown.
And you think, right, if they all open, then, you know, you're going to get $30.
30 cops turn up in a meat wagon and kicking off.
But if the next village open and then Belper open, like, you know, 60 pubs in Belper, 150 in Derby, whatever.
Good luck policing that, mate.
You can't. And that's what people need to do.
And I think more and more will.
I think people will just go, do you know what?
I'm opening. Yeah, well, that's what needs to happen.
And... I've mentioned this before.
It's a song from the 60s, which goes, freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.
And we are heading towards the point where people have nothing left to lose, because they've lost their business, they've lost their employment.
And, you know, the governments are buying time up to this point, and the British government is buying time with the furlough payments.
But where this is heading is the edge of the economic bloody cliff.
Of course it is. And then people have nothing to lose.
Okay, so I comply.
Well, I've lost everything anyway.
So I don't comply.
Well, I've lost everything anyway.
There's nothing left to lose.
And that's going to be a time when I think we're going to see the waters start to break.
And the authorities, the cults in other words, are very aware of this, why they're recruiting more police, and this is why they want the military on the streets, because they know this is coming.
But as with Randy Vaughan, we need to do it anyway, because not doing it is going to have much more dire consequences than doing it.
And I just want to mention before we finish, Gaz, this is about the mind games that are being played, but it's also about the naivety Of people who claim to be anti-system.
So I'll give you an example of what I'm just going to mention.
This cult doesn't mind if you have a different view of where the virus came from, so long as you accept there is a virus.
It's when you say there is no virus, that's where you cross the line.
That's when I said that back in March, April, and all the censorship started.
So they don't mind. If you have a different view of the virus that came out of a Wuhan lab, they're not really bothered as long as you accept there is a virus.
And of course, people talk about a bioweapon coming out of a Wuhan lab.
This is what I would say. The bioweapon is not the virus.
The bioweapon is the vaccine justified by the virus.
And on that basic principle, we have this story.
Pfizer seen as putting profits ahead of dead Mexicans.
But taxpayer-funded Covid jabs should belong to everyone, Oxfam tells RT. Oxfam Claims to challenge the system of injustice around the world that creates poverty, creates hunger and such things.
But the cult that has created those injustices and that hunger purposely, systematically Is the same cult behind the COVID vaccine?
So, instead of challenging the source of it all, Oxfam goes along with it, think the vaccine exists, no matter how we think it exists, as opposed to it doesn't exist.
Oxfam goes along with The vaccine is good, but it's just injustice that not everyone's getting it in the poor world.
What Oxfam, in its cluelessness about the world, doesn't realise, well some at the core may, but I mean in general, is that this cult behind the vaccine wants everybody in the world to have the vaccine and thus by demanding through challenging injustice perceived that everyone in the developing world must have the vaccine because it's not fair otherwise Oxfam is promoting exactly what the cult wants.
The cult that's behind all the injustice and the hunger, poverty that it was set up to challenge.
This is what happens if you are uninformed and not streetwise about how the world works.
And on the same subject, why don't we give you a quote from Oxfam before I finish this?
The vaccines themselves are owned by the public.
They are a public good.
They are a public good.
Research into the vaccine, Oxfam, on which that statement is based, zero.
It seems crazy to us to invest all this private money only to privatize the outcome and privatize the profits for huge companies like Pfizer.
So everybody must have the vaccine.
It's only fair. This is what happens when you don't understand the world that you're pontificating about.
And here's another classic case.
This is the Director of Africa's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Just a straight swap or mirror image of the CDC in America.
And it's called on rich nations, this director, it's called on rich nations to share COVID-19 vaccine supplies after a number of Western countries ordered quantities far in excess of their need.
And he called on the United Nations to hold a meeting on the fair and ethical distribution of vaccines, adding that it is necessary to avoid this North-South distrust in respect to vaccines, which is a common good.
Safety of the vaccines?
Oxfam? No mention.
Safety of the vaccines?
African man?
Not a mention.
And this is why they want to silence those who are streetwise enough to see through all these different levels of crap to what's actually going on.
And in 2020...
A lot more people have entered that arena of awareness.
And on that basis, 2020 has not been all bad.
It can be the change in the perceptions of so many people that can lead us into 2021.
▲
Export Selection