All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 20, 2020 - David Icke
51:16
New Definition Of Insanity: Having The Gates Vaccine - David Icke Dot-Connector
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the David Wright Dot
Connector video cast.
This week we're going to be talking about vaccines.
They're everywhere, obviously.
Didn't see that coming.
Dad, how are you mate? I'm good, Gaz.
But what was always coming is nearly here.
And that's the Gates vaccine.
And I've called this...
This video, a new definition for insanity, having the Gates vaccine, because that's what it is.
When you put all the pieces together, you have a virus that's never been shown to exist, that the tests are not testing for, and Even if you believe there is a virus, then the numbers, even by the manipulated figures, I say 100% manipulated, does not justify What is being done in response and certainly doesn't justify what Gates and the rest of his cultists want,
which is for every man, woman and child on the planet to be vaccinated with a vaccine that has been put together In a ridiculously short time, well into record territory compared with other vaccines and all the years they take to develop, and even then cause tremendous harm to people.
And you're dealing with vaccine manufacturers with a long history of damaging people with their products and their drugs.
Paying out billions for the consequences of drugs and lying about their drugs.
And we have the same companies given immunity from prosecution by the American Congress in the 1980s.
And the taxpayer in America, then becoming responsible for paying for the consequences, life-ending consequences of vaccines, and it's so far paid out well in excess of $4 billion, with a bar extremely high to prove your case.
We now have this COVID-19 vaccine, as is claimed, and they've been given immunity from prosecution for the effects of that, and they're now announcing a series of side effects That are likely to be experienced by many people as a result of having it.
They want to vaccinate children for this quote coronavirus when they've never produced a vaccine yet for any coronavirus.
And children are, up to this point, virtually untouched.
Even by the lies, mendacity and figure fixing that we're being subjected to.
And then, with all that background and more, not only are they saying you must have the vaccine for a virus they've never shown to exist, And with the health effects, even if you believe their figures, being minimal, they want to have mandatory vaccinations where you are forced to have it and your children are forced to have it.
Now, clearly, that is not happening Because of any health concern.
So why do they want every man, woman and child on the planet to have the vaccine?
Because there's stuff in it which is going to have a highly detrimental effect and indeed transformative effect.
On the human body, which has been in my books for so long that that was the plan and here we are now looking it in the eye.
And so when I look at that and at the same time see people in large numbers saying, yeah, let's have the vaccine.
Yeah, let's have it mandatory.
That has to be a new definition of insanity and if people want to be that insane that clueless then they should be and they should take the consequences of their decision but then as parents to stand by and allow that to happen to your children Is disgusting, sickening, contemptible beyond my capacity to comprehend it.
It is madness that we are looking at.
And I saw this story about...
It was people who were being asked about mandatory vaccinations.
And they said, or one of them said, inject me now.
On the basis of, if you say I can only go and see a band at a concert, if I'm injected with this Gates vaccine, then inject me now, because I want to see me band.
Well, what is that except insanity?
That seeing a band is more important.
Than looking at why this vaccine is being imposed on the world.
And of course this week we've had the health secretary in Britain, Matt Hancock, a man who is a psychopath masquerading as an idiot, who has refused to rule out mandatory vaccinations in Britain.
And he's refused to rule them out because that's the plan, as I've been saying all along.
We're having the similar situation emerging in other countries like Denmark.
And because it's a global agenda to vaccinate every man, woman and child on the planet, all these different countries, centrally coordinated, are all moving towards mandatory vaccinations.
And of course, the plan B Is that if you don't have the Gates vaccine, with its life-transforming contents, then you won't be able to go to a concert.
Inject me now! Or do all the other things that have been taken for granted, like working, traveling, and so on.
And We are looking extremes of fascism in the face.
And if we don't acknowledge and see what we're dealing with, then inject me now will take us down the road to complete human control.
And a human society completely unimaginable.
Only last February.
And we really are at a fork in the road.
And this vaccine and how many take it will decide to a very large extent where we go from here.
And people say, I want to see me banned.
I want to do this.
I want to do that. Or think short term.
But if you're thinking about the kids and you're thinking indeed about yourself in the future, there is nothing, nothing that should take priority Over refusing to have this vaccine.
And I talked this week in a video to Celeste Solem, a former worker with the Federal Emergency Management Agency in America, FEMA, that came onto my radar and into my books in the 1990s, 1993-4, because it is a deeply sinister part of Of this global web of cultists and psychopaths.
And she discusses in that video, which is already, even with the bans from YouTube, in the alternative platforms, got an enormous number of hits in a very short time.
She talks about what she says is going to be in this vaccine, which fits my own research over the years.
And if you're thinking of having it, then please watch that video first.
They're making a real effort.
Obviously, there's a censorship side of it, so they don't want to have the alternative opinions on vaccines anyway.
But the other thing I noticed today...
See, we've spoken about this before, where government polls aren't there to tell you the truth about what people think.
They're about... Manipulating you to think in that way.
So there was a government poll today on YouGov and it was saying that I think 57% might have been higher to be fair.
I think it was about 57% of people in Britain think that the vaccine should be mandatory.
Nonsense. Nonsense.
57% of people aren't scum.
So they don't think that.
But what they do with that is that influences your opinion of, oh, because everyone wants to be part of the herd, don't they?
For some freaking reason. No idea why.
But, oh, 57. Oh, yeah, yeah, no, I think that as well then.
Yeah, I don't want to be in the minority because that's, yeah, that's not good.
Yeah, yeah, no, I think that, you know.
And you can see how they do it to try and just manipulate people's view and how people think.
Interestingly, like you said about Hancock, when he said that about mandatory vaccinations, I tweeted at him and I said, that's fine, but I want you to administer mine.
I want you to come around my house and administer mine yourself.
And if anyone at home goes to Google and types into Google Images, Matt Hancock football, and see the picture of him absolutely terrified of a football football, I think I'll be alright if he comes around my house to do it, Dad.
Well, the thing is that Hancock is a front man.
He's just a puppet, just like Johnson.
But they have been on this road for long enough to know exactly what they're doing now.
They're not that stupid.
They're doing this knowing what the plan is.
And so they have to go to jail for the rest of their lives, along with Valence and Witte and Fauci and all of them.
Because they absolutely, those dark suits, unelected medical dark suits, absolutely know that What's happening.
That's why they lie to us about the figures and the projected figures to justify more and more lockdown to destroy people's livelihoods, which is all part of making the global population Dependent on the state and thus be under the control of the state.
And what you say about polls is exactly how it works.
We've seen this in the American election, where the polls were wildly, wildly inaccurate.
And it wasn't because they didn't know what they were doing.
It was to give the impression that Trump had no chance and thus affect the result.
So polls are just irrelevant.
And if you want to stop being manipulated by them, then just take no notice of polls, just as you take no notice of the media.
Because the media and the pollster organizations are all controlled by the same force.
And by the way, this week...
When being questioned in a virtual committee on Capitol Hill, Mark Zuckerberg, the Facebook CEO, actually the Facebook front man, that's all he is, admitted that Facebook, Twitter and Google, etc.
were We're having discussions.
We're communicating over censorship, mutually censoring people.
Because like I've said, for decades, this web that connects all these organizations exists.
And since many years passed, Facebook, Google, YouTube, and Twitter are all owned by the same force.
So they move as one unit.
And what we're seeing more and more and more is what was considered conspiracy theory.
Coming to the surface as conspiracy fact, because as they move more and more into their transformation of human society, even well beyond even where it is now, they have to break the surface where we can see them and we can see how the web connects and drives the same agenda.
It's the same with the fact checkers.
I did that interview with Dino Weyand where he was linking obviously the CCDH that are trying to silence you and many many others to the fact checking organizations and then they link all into the Center for American Progress which is the Democrats basically all the way into Podesta and all this sort of stuff so they're in control of everything and actually today when I got up in the morning I had a look on Twitter just to see if the world had exploded and The first story was there were no dead people voted in the American election.
None. There was none.
New York Times, right?
Okay, so Democrat.
CNN, okay, Democrat.
And factcheck.org.
Those were the three that reported it.
So there was no dead people voted.
So I looked at factcheck.org because I don't know a lot about them.
So who's the first name on the list of directorship?
Bang, bang, bang. Here's the... Used to write for CNN. Oh, right.
Okay. Democrats then.
So, there were no dead people voted, the Democrats said.
And that's like kind of the equivalent of going up to a serial killer and saying, did you do it?
No. No, he didn't do it.
And accepting that.
It's madness. They run these fact checkers and they sell them as independent and they're not independent at all.
Yeah, the thing is about Democrat, though.
Democrat's just another word for 1%.
The Democratic Party has been taken over by the cult long ago.
It's not the Democrat Party that people in the 60s or even then, you know, there was a lot of questions about it, but it's not the same party even that it was then.
So, when you're talking about fact-checkers and Silicon Valley and these pollsters, etc., and the political parties, and these censor organizations like the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which just tries to get people to hate their targets, they are all part of the same vast web pushing the world in the same direction.
I just want to mention one thing that Dr.
Andrew Kaufman sent me this morning, actually.
It's on davidike.com, so you can see the full document.
But the headline just tells the story.
The scam has been confirmed.
PCR does not detect SARS-CoV-2.
Now, Of course I've been putting this information out since the spring that PCR does not detect infectious viruses or This SARS-CoV-2 because SARS-CoV-2 not least has never been isolated and shown to exist and even if it did exist the PCR test couldn't pick up infectious viruses as its creator Kerry Mullis has stated Now, how this relates to the vaccine and having the vaccine being a new definition of insanity is that the people who are pushing the vaccine and wanting to make it mandatory know that the PCR test is not testing for the virus.
What they're doing is producing fake cases with a fake test, not testing for the virus.
And this is a document which is well worth reading on davidite.com.
I'll just read you one paragraph from it, give you a feel.
The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to COVID-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes.
Now this is confirming what I've been putting out all these months.
Which is that the PCR is not testing for a virus, it's testing for genetic material.
And so it's picking up genetic material that's in the bodies of people, giving them no problem.
This is why the overwhelming vast majority that test positive have no symptoms, because there's nothing wrong with them, because it's not a positive test for an infectious agent.
And the report goes on.
And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed genome, and even the so-called target genes allegedly specific to the new coronavirus.
So what they're calling this SARS-CoV-2 is simply genetic material that's found in the body anyway, and you can manipulate the test to To make, in the end, if you do it to an extreme extent, everybody tests positive.
And I'm going to come to that, the relevance of that in relation to this vaccine in a second.
So, the report, the study says, Stephen Bustin, one of the world's leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions, anyone can test positive, as I've just mentioned.
Now, how is this relevant to the vaccine?
Because, one...
The people who are saying you must have the vaccine and they want to make it mandatory are the same people that know the test is not testing for the virus.
So all the cases and all the deaths attributed to it are fantasy and fiction.
But what they do with this PCR test and all the other versions of the test are exactly the same.
Useless and irrelevant.
They take a tiny piece, minuscule piece of genetic material, and they amplify it.
And if you amplify it enough times that, in other words, you blow it up and you bring out, better way of putting it, you bring out more and more genetic material in the sample that the test will ping positive for.
So the more cycles of amplification, the more people are going to test positive, not for a fricking virus, but for genetic material in their body.
And it's reckoned, even among those that buy into the PCR test, That any amplification over 30-35 cycles is useless.
Actually, it's all useless in identifying a virus.
The National Health Service in Britain and many other countries have been using 45 cycles of amplification.
So they've produced enormous numbers of cases that are not cases, but have been generated by the level of amplification.
Now, how does this affect the vaccine?
Well, this is a key reason Why there had to be no virus, no infectious agent, certainly at this stage.
Because if you have, let's just take it from the vaccine point of view.
They are going to vaccinate enormous numbers of people.
And they're going to have to show, to give it credibility, that the vaccine works.
Now, they've never produced a vaccine for a coronavirus, and they can't isolate and show to exist a virus anyway for various reasons.
But if there was a real infectious agent, then they would have to produce a vaccine that worked against that infectious agent.
Otherwise, people say, look, you know, these people, they've been vaccinated and they're still getting it.
So having a real infectious agent is the last thing you want, because you know you can't produce a vaccine, stop it.
But if you have no And you're just manipulating the illusion of its existence in the ways that I'm talking about with the test and fixing the figures and fixing death certificates and massively amplifying the sample so you get vast numbers of positives in the test, not testing for the virus.
Then as you can use amplifications To give you more and more cases, you can reverse that amplification, certainly when you're testing people who've been vaccinated, and you're going to get a vast increase in negatives.
And so, by not having a virus, a real virus, you can manipulate the testing To make it appear that the vaccine has worked.
When all you've done is scan the test and scan the figures.
And when you manipulate people to believe the vaccine has worked in this way, Then you're putting more and more pressure on people that won't have the vaccine as being a danger to society because the vaccine works.
And anyone, ladies and gentlemen, who would manipulate the figures as they have to justify the economic, personal, and health mayhem that they created worldwide Is pure, undiluted evil.
And a psychopath on a scale that is almost unimaginable.
These are the people who are telling you you must have their vaccine.
And so having it is a new definition of insanity.
I said when the vaccine rolled out a couple of weeks ago and they started talking about, oh, it'd be ready by this point, be ready by this point, before the end of the year.
Now, we've spoken about this before.
Now, they always tell us, they always tell us, whether it's, you know, a karmic thing, whether it's, you know, almost like a vampire has to be invited in, like the beast has to be invited over the threshold.
You know, on an occult level, they always tell you what they're doing, which is why with the PCR test...
You know, Fauci says, he admits, 35 cycles and above, waste of time.
The NHS tell you they're using 45 cycles.
Now, they know that most people aren't going to look into that because most people don't look away from the telly long enough to look into that.
But they tell you. They're always telling you what they're doing.
It says on the death figures underneath it, died of any cause after 28 days of a positive test.
So they're not lying to us. They're telling us the scam.
We're just either not looking or not concentrating.
So I said at the time, they were talking about this vaccine coming out, because they will tell us, we need to look for subtle changes in how they record deaths, how they record hospitalizations, and how they record positive cases.
At the same time, the vaccine is rolled out.
Because they will change the definition of all of those things.
And they'll tell us they're doing it.
It will be somewhere locked away in a little bit on the ONS website or on Public Health England or on the CDC or whatever.
But it will be there. So as soon as this vaccine comes out, you know, we need to put on our x-ray specs and go and actually have a look and see.
Because they will 100%, like you said, they will change how the cases are recorded, deaths are recorded, to make it appear like the vaccine works.
Yeah, and another aspect of this, a big red flashing lights, is this theme coming from every direction of censoring and silencing anyone who is questioning this vaccine.
Coming from all directions.
And this week, We've had this clown, Neil Basu, Metropolitan Police Counter Terror Chief, God help us, calling for action on coronavirus anti-vaxxers.
They are so desperate.
And this clown will probably be in the hierarchy and have no clue what he's doing.
He's just doing what he's told to do.
But they are so desperate.
To get every man, woman and child vaccinated.
That they are targeting anyone who is putting out information exposing why people shouldn't do that.
So Britain's top counter-terrorism officer today is not the top counter-terrorism officer.
He's just been put into that position.
It doesn't mean he's top anything.
He might be a freaking idiot.
I imagine he is an idiot.
He looks like a bowling ball in a fancy suit.
He's this county terrorism officer, and he called for a nationwide debate on the introduction of new laws to punish people who spread anti-vaccination conspiracy theories.
Now, look at the language.
Called for a nationwide debate.
Mr. Basu, you know that what you are calling for is what is planned to be imposed.
It's unbelievable.
And I do understand it in some cases, how stupid they think the public are.
Well, lots of us aren't, mate.
Metropolitan Police or Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu said there should be a discussion, note the language, he knows it's due to be imposed, about whether it is the correct thing for society to allow people to spread misinformation that could cost lives as he responded to concern that false claims online could undermine the take-up of COVID-19 vaccines.
So now you have the reason he's saying this.
Because information challenging the official story is going to make people go, hold on a minute.
I'm not sure I'm having me and my kids vaccinated with this thing.
I mean, now I know more about it.
They don't want you to know more about it.
That's the whole point.
And the desperation to demonize people questioning what is obviously in need of questioning is Shows how important to this overall plan for humanity is this vaccine.
And we've also had the Labour Party, the so-called opposition party, what a joke, in Britain, demanding emergency legislation to target and silence People questioning the vaccine.
The Labour Party, supposedly set up as the party of the working class.
And their people want to have social media and other sources silence those that are questioning this vaccine with all the reasons That it needs to be questioned.
And who do they quote in support of that in this article about this Labour fascism?
That's what it is. But the Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
Quail Surprise. Yeah, this is an organisation created by insider members of the Labour Party.
Like Imran Ahmed, a Labour activist and advisor.
Kirsty McNeil, senior advisor to the disastrous Gordon Brown when he was a Labour Party Prime Minister.
Morgan McSweeney, who is now Chief of Staff To the Tel Aviv worshipping Keir Starmer, the alleged leader of the Labour Party.
And because they are a web representation of the one-party state, all those people that would project themselves as wokers are also joined in the Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
by Damien Collins, a right-wing neocon conservative member of parliament who suggested that it should be made a criminal offense for me to put out information questioning the narrative.
And just to show you how this web works Where they cover every base.
This is an article in The Independent, which of course is a joke.
You have to reverse Independent to find out what that media operation is really about.
They talk about this Labour effort to impose censorship on people questioning the vaccine, which is just fascism.
That's all it is. And they quote at the end, someone called Ruth Smeeth, And Ruth Smith is the Chief Executive of Index on Censorship.
And she is arguing very, very weakly and mildly against this censorship.
And says that although she agrees that science facts shouldn't be challenged, She thinks that, well, people should have the freedom to do it.
She says, in the midst of a public health emergency, ensuring that there is accurate information about treatments and vaccines is key.
So she's coming from their angle while appearing to come from, oh yeah, but I'm against censorship.
We can't ignore that people may challenge and push back against the scientific facts.
See, the vaccine is fact.
And anyone pushing back against it is pushing against scientific fact.
This is someone, a former Labour Party MP, by the way, Ruth Smith, and a big ultra-Zionist.
She is apparently saying she's against censorship, but supporting all the pillars of what the other side is saying.
And the punchline of this, of course, is that Ruth Smith...
Has been big time connected to an organization called Hope Not Hate, which I think more accurately should be called Hate Not Hope, which is a censorship, silencing, cancel culture organization.
This is the same woman who's supposed to be supporting freedom of speech.
And this Hope Not Hate connects into the same web As the Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
An organisation that morphed seamlessly from targeting people because of hate speech to targeting people for questioning any aspect of the narrative of the virus pandemic hoax.
Because these organisations are not about targeting hate.
They're full of it. They're about silencing anyone who is challenging any aspect of the agenda of the web of which they are part.
The interesting thing you made, like just going back slightly to the Matt terror chief, so he wants to have a debate on whether we should basically silence and disappear people questioning the vaccine.
Notice they don't want to have a debate on the vaccine though.
No, of course not. They don't want to have that debate.
They want to have a debate whether or not to shut people up, which the answer will obviously be yes, because that's what they do.
It does make me laugh, though.
Like, if I'm sure of my convictions and the science is sound, why not have a debate on it?
Why not look at both sides and go, here you go?
Because then, in theory, if you're right, you're going to knock all the anti-vaxxers out of the park and it's game over.
But you won't do that.
And so... Why?
I mean, I know why, but the masses should be asking the question, why?
Why do you not want to talk about it?
Well, obviously they don't want to talk about it because they'd lose the debate.
That's why they, you know, when you're pushing a lie and a narrative that doesn't stand up to scrutiny, which is virtually everything they ever say, Then you don't want to debate.
This is why this Imran Ahmed of this digital hate organization and all the other crowd connected to him will not debate with me.
I've offered, debate me live.
I'll take you all on. Just me.
Bring who you bloody like.
But they won't.
Because they know they'll lose the debate at stage one.
So the only alternative to protect your lie...
Is to silence anyone who is exposing your lies.
This is what the censorship is about, of course.
And now we have the government's broadcast censor in Britain called Ofcom, Office of Communications, that's now targeting independent video sharing platforms like BitChute.
To stop people having a non-censored alternative to the criminal, fascist censorship of YouTube.
I said in the book so long ago, what they want is for no one to ever hear anything Or see anything that isn't approved by the state, which means approved by the cult that controls the state in country after country after country.
And that is where we are going.
They are running around like one of those fairground games where heads keep coming up and they keep hitting them down with a hammer.
Whack-a-mole. First of all, they create or support censorship by the mainstream cult-owned corporations like Google and YouTube and Facebook.
And so what people who care about freedom do is they create alternatives, non-censored alternatives, to, for instance, YouTube.
So what Ofcom does is Is then target those platforms to destroy them because they're running around trying to delete any opportunity that people have to have their opinions and their evidence and their research circulated publicly.
So on that basis, Ofcom is a fascist organization.
Imposing fascism on behalf of a fascist UK government.
That's what we're looking at.
And it's headed by someone called Melanie Dawes, who was appointed in February 2020, a career bureaucrat, gone up the greasy pole by doing whatever the system tells her to do.
She was appointed, just by coincidence, nothing to worry about, In February 2020, just as this was about to kick off.
And what her organization has done ever since is try to silence anyone putting an alternative view to current events.
And this is why in any journalistic organization or any proper journalistic organization or arena, I would have been all over the mainstream media in the last few months putting an alternative view to what's going on.
But I haven't been because Ofcom have stopped it.
Ofcom, this fascist organization created by Tony Blair, that's how fascist it is, has told the broadcast mainstream media in Britain that they must not have debate, for instance, on 5G's connection to the, quote, virus.
Or a debate that includes challenging and exposing the official story of the pandemic coming out of the World Health Organization and government agencies.
People like Hancock, Valence, Fauci in America.
And Witte, of course, under Ofcom remit, they operate in Britain.
And so...
What are you doing, mainstream media?
Why are you on your knees praying for forgiveness at the image of Melanie Dawes and the chairman of Ofcom, another system server, economist, and chairman of Channel 4.
How could you be chairman of Channel 4?
And chairman of Ofcom that regulates Channel 4.
What? But it's all a scam.
And now they want to delete the ability of independent video platforms to put out information challenging the system.
And how these people sleep at night is beyond me.
Like a baby, I suspect.
When the censorship kicked off big time, even before this, and people were getting kicked off Facebook and kicked off Twitter and YouTube and channels were being deleted left, right and centre, Vimeo, all of them, PayPal.
You saw so many people, morons, going, well, it's not censorship.
It's not denying your free speech because these are private companies and they don't have to host you.
That's their freedom.
Which obviously isn't true in the fact that they get away with everything because they're supposed to be non-partisan and they are partisan.
So they should actually come under the same regulations as everyone else.
But they get away with it because they have this role of, no, we're not partisan.
People put up what they want.
Well, no, they don't because you censor people.
So actually, you do have a horse in the race.
But anyway, they then say, it's not really censorship because you're free to start your own platform.
Okay, so a lot of people, like Alex Jones, for instance, like the guys at BitChute, like the guys at Library, they went, all right, All right, then we will.
And so now you're attacking that.
So it was never about them being private companies and not against free speech.
It was always about destroying free speech.
Exactly. And that's Ofcom's role.
That's what it was created by Tony Blair to do.
And I think it was 2001 that he announced its creation.
And the plans for it.
And it's just been given more and more power over more and more freedom of speech in a broadcast form, because that's what it was planned to be all along.
And Melanie Dawes, the CEO of Ofcom, will know that.
It's something that's just blatantly obvious.
And so they're trying to shut down everything.
They're even wanting to target subscription platforms where people actually decide, make the choice, To pay a subscription so that they can see content that they want to see.
Ofcom wants to target them now.
Because they're a fascist organisation dispensing fascism for a fascist UK government, which is controlled ultimately by a fascist global cult.
Did I mention fascism? I might have done somewhere.
It's interesting, actually. I didn't know Tony Blair set that up around 2001.
But that's interesting.
So he sets it up around the time of 9-11, just before the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq, where people are going to be asking questions and putting out content.
Yeah, it then followed a little while and then it was created and started.
Yeah, absolutely right. Well, that's interesting because another story that's come out, I think, yesterday...
See, I'm thinking from an outside point of view.
Now, if we're in a global pandemic where people are dying and it's really bad and the hospitals are overrun and people are losing their livelihoods and the ability to feed their families and there's food shortages because factories are being closed down, I imagine that's probably the best time to chuck billions and billions and billions of pounds into the military, Dad.
What do you think? Well, this is the story that Boris Johnson, well, Boris Johnson officially promised the military an extra 16.5 billion pounds.
And it's being described as the biggest program of investment in Britain's armed forces since the end of the Cold War.
And this has to be put in the context of thousands more police officers being recruited Because once you know where the plan is meant to go, things like this become an open book.
These tens of billions of pounds for the military, suddenly announced out of nowhere, are to be used in truth for military impositions on the domestic population of Britain.
How long have I been saying the plan is to fuse the police with the military, to create a military police state?
And we're seeing now the military more and more involved in this virus hoax, and more and more seen on the streets get people used to it.
Thousands of people being recruited as police officers into private companies, because that's what police forces are, private companies operating on contract corporate law.
That's what they're administering.
See my video on common law, which you can see at davidike.com.
And these things are all happening because they're preparing for full-blown fascism to impose the will of what has long been a government of occupation in Britain.
It's not a democratic... I mean, Parliament's irrelevant.
Johnson's irrelevant. There's a cabal in the background that's running this, and it's happening in every country.
And answering to the global cabal, which is coordinating, which is why everything's happening in the same way, in country after country after country at the same time.
And so, more and more, people are starting to get it.
They're starting to realize what's going on, and where this is heading.
And so what you do is you massively increase the funding of the military and the recruitment of thousands of new police officers because you know you're going to have to use them to impose the will of this fascist cabal on the people.
And, you know, I say it until I turn bloody blue.
That where we are is not where it's meant to end.
▲
Export Selection