All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 5, 2020 - David Icke
01:24:14
David Icke Talks To In View TV Australia
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Hello, welcome to my show on InView TV on this Monday
evening, if you're here in Australia or perhaps it's on some other
day, depending where you are around the world.
Tonight I'm very excited to have a guest on that's being referred to and I've just got a bit of a note here.
He's being referred to many things including the Godfather of the Truth Movement, a messenger, a guru, but he's also referred to as a leonie, a madman, even a danger to society.
Is any of these things?
I'm not sure. Or is he just an observer and a connector of dots?
Let's get straight into it as I welcome you my guest.
Many people find it hard to accept a few people could orchestrate a whole global pandemic hoax.
But in fact, when we understand the structure of how the world's controlled, it becomes relatively straightforward.
I've talked for decades about a global cult, what some call the 1%, a global web of interconnected strands of secret societies, semi-secret groups, and then in the public arena, government agencies. And all of these groups appear on the surface to be unconnected.
They aren't. Now, if you're going to prove that a virus exists, and you're going to prove that that virus causes an alleged infectious disease, then purification and isolation of that viral material is an absolute solid gold foundation must do.
It's never been done.
What you then had in those early days was COVID-19 being diagnosed on symptoms.
And what were the symptoms? Flu-like symptoms.
They then start developing this test called the PCR test and the creator of the test called Kerry Mullis in the 1980s actually said this test should not be used to diagnose infectious disease.
But that's exactly what's happened ever since.
An area called Lombardy, which is notorious for its toxic air and its respiratory disease, just like Wuhan.
And the country was locked down.
The official government figures in Italy revealed that 99% of people said to have died from COVID-19 Had one or more other morbidities, reasons to die.
But everyone was now designated COVID-19, and there seemed to be a crisis when old people were dying of things that old people have always died from in that area.
And a health spokesman for the Italian government would later come out and say, actually, we were, quote, generous on designating deaths as COVID-19.
In his view, in truth, only about 12% of the people said to have died died from COVID-19.
And yet, the media were full of the hysteria to frighten the hell out of Western people.
Hello, everybody. You probably know by now that I've been deleted from YouTube and deleted from Facebook and efforts are going on to delete me from other places.
And we can sit here and play the victim.
Oh, poor me. Or we can say, okay.
What do we do about it?
Let's give some respect to a man of truth, Mr.
David Arnick! Yes!
David! David!
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Whoa!
What a sight!
I have dreamed of moments like this so many times and despaired here and there.
That they would ever come and here it is!
Humanity awakens!
No, it's not the majority yet, nor even nearly so.
But the momentum has begun, and the spirit of this place must sweep across the world if we are to stop Orwell's boot stamping on the human face forever.
I welcome to everyone Gary Vike. Thank you very much. I just want to say it's an honour
and a privilege to stand shoulder to shoulder with every single one of you.
It takes courage to stand up at the best of times and it really takes courage to stand up now, so thank you for doing that.
It takes courage here because we know exactly how we're going to be portrayed by the mainstream media as far-right lunatics and conspiracy theorists, nutcases, grandma killers, whatever they think of, fascists.
Is there a flag out there somewhere or something?
The mainstream media is never, ever, ever going to be on our side because they are owned and controlled by the very people we are fighting against.
We're never going to get their acceptance and we should stop seeking it because we're well beyond that now.
We're in a psychological war and we are the front line.
All those people that are home getting their entire narrative from the BBC are never going to come and fight for us, but that doesn't mean that we don't fight for them.
Exactly! Exactly!
I've got nothing but love for every single one of you, for every single police officer, for every single counter-protester, for every single person sat at home watching us and shaking their head.
Because hate and division is what's got us in this mess and love and unity is what's going to get us out of it.
David Icke, welcome to my show on InView TV. How are you?
I'm good, mate. um i saw another busy weekend for you some protests happening in london i believe there are many many thousands there i've read some news stories about it and we'll get into that a little bit later on but before we do i want you to tell sorry david 40 000 people plus for that Yeah, okay. Amazing. Before we get into that, and we definitely will get into that, I want you to tell the viewers a bit about David Icke, the person.
Background, I know you were a professional soccer player at one point, an author of many books, sports presenter.
So give the viewers a bit of a background on David Icke.
Well, I was born in the English Midlands in 1952 and I wanted to be a footballer.
My whole childhood was Seeking that end, that goal.
Well, appropriately goal.
Except that I was goalkeeper, so goals were not something I liked very much.
And I played schools football and eventually joined a club called Coventry City.
And my career went on and then ended with I had rheumatoid arthritis at the age of 21, just 21.
And I'd always been fascinated as a kid with journalism, so I moved into journalism, newspapers, radio, and then television with the BBC, became a national television presenter.
I did news and then overwhelmingly sport.
And then I got very interested in protecting the environment and became a national spokesman for the British Green Party, which didn't last too long because I realized that politics is part of the problem, not the solution to anything.
And then I had some extraordinarily amazing paranormal experiences, which led me on a journey of Discovery, asking the question, who really controls the world and to what end?
And over the last 30 years since that started out, I've been to 60-odd countries, researching and speaking.
And in my books, way back in the 90s, current events were predicted, not because I'm a prophet pulling it out of the ether, But because there is an agenda for the world and if you can access that agenda then predicting the future in detail as well as theme becomes Relatively simple, because what you're doing is you are uncovering the agenda for the world, where this network wants to take the world, and if nothing intervenes to stop it, which is the whole point of what I do, then it's going to become the future.
And this is the same...
World, secret world, if you like, that people like Aldous Huxley tapped into with Brave New World and George Orwell with 1984.
This is why they, all those decades ago, have been so accurate in what they described in their books as we look at current events.
So were they accurate because they knew what was going on?
They were part of the agenda or was it just research they did or it was just pure fiction that happened to come true?
Well, it wasn't pure fiction that hadn't come true.
I mean, if you look at the interviews with Aldous Huxley, he died in 1963.
He is describing current events.
And he was a kind of insider.
He came from an insider family.
George Orwell, real name Eric Blair, he went to Eton College, where the royals go to.
So I'm not saying George Orwell was in on it.
Of course he wasn't. He was trying to expose it.
But what they had access to, both of them, was this projected agenda for the world.
And although, of course, there will be some poetic license in there, in their fundamentals, they were absolutely right.
In fact, Huxley's becoming more right all the time.
As we move into this genetic manipulation of the human body, which has become known as Human 2.0, and the connection to artificial intelligence and technology, and the use of drugs, etc.
All that is in Brave New World, whereas Orwell was looking at the The bricks and mortar, if you like, police state, actually police military state is what it's designed to be.
And, you know, another thing that I've exposed over the years is how technology...
That appears in the public arena as, oh, we've just discovered this.
The real foundation technology for human control has actually been known about for a long time.
And the plan to bring it in has been known about for a long time.
And so when Orwell talked about his telescreens where you were filmed in your own home and it was recorded and The audio, etc.
was recorded. That's now called smart TVs.
And what we're seeing currently are only the first versions of smart TVs.
They're not in terms of surveillance where it's meant to go.
And I've quoted...
I've seen people in my books over the years, particularly one guy called Dr.
Richard Day. He was a massive Rockefeller family insider.
He was an executive of Planned Parenthood, which is a Rockefeller organization.
And he addressed a meeting Of pediatricians in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 1969.
And he asked them not to take notes and to turn off recording equipment.
Why he did it? No, I'm glad he did, though.
Because he was going to tell them how the world was going to change.
And one doctor, a guy called Lawrence Dunagan, he did take notes.
And before he died, around 2004, he started...
I'm doing interviews about what Day said that night, because he had realized that what Day said was going to happen was happening.
And one of the things that Day described in 1969 was the Internet.
We're supposed to have been developed in the 1980s.
He also said that night, we are going to make boys and girls the same.
In a book called Phantom Self, I detail at length what Day said that night.
It's extraordinary. And he was tapping in, because he was an insider, to the same agenda, projected agenda, that Huxley was, Orwell was, and I have been doing for the last 30 years.
You were saying about the technology and how it's been around for years.
I watched a Netflix show on the weekend, The Social Dilemma, and in that it mentioned how technology, the ability to process a computer process, has gone along like that and in the last couple of years it's just gone like that.
And so the computer's becoming more powerful, but we're not evolving at the same time or nowhere near the same rate.
And so that's a problem within itself.
We might come back to that.
So I want to get onto more of the COVID situation and the response to it.
So we've seen around the world a massive thing that's obviously happening.
The virus in some parts seem to be worse than others and I've got here in some people are saying the virus is no worse than the flu.
It's no deadly than the flu.
Other people saying, and I'm surprised actually who's saying this, some people are saying that the virus is around, yes, but it's not a pandemic.
And we've got some people on the mainstream media here in Australia saying that, which is a bit of a surprise.
You go one step further and you're saying that perhaps the virus itself doesn't even exist.
Well, yeah, what I've done, and I started this in March, was to go to medical professionals who were questioning this.
And get their take on this alleged virus.
And when they break it down, the usual means through which you show that A, an infectious agent exists, and B, that it's causing what you say it's causing, they have not been followed.
They have not been done.
Not from China right through to today.
And this is the point, especially currently.
Because what we're being used or what's being used to terrify us now is the number of, quote, cases.
Well... Where are the cases coming from?
How do you know that someone has this, quote, virus?
Because overwhelmingly of a test called the RT-PCR test, which is being used to diagnose an infectious disease, when its inventor, a man called Kerry Mullis, an American who won the Nobel Prize for developing it, said that his test must not be used.
To diagnose infectious disease because it can't.
As he said, the PCR test cannot detect free infectious viruses.
And what it tests for is genetic material.
And what they do is they take a tiny, tiny, minuscule amount of genetic material, which they say is diseased.
And this PCR test amplifies it, blows it up in effect.
And the more you amplify it, the more the content of the genetic material, not to virus, this genetic material, becomes sensitive to the test.
So if you amplify the genetic material, say, 30 times, you'll get a certain amount of positives from the test.
Not positives for the virus, positives for elements of this genetic material.
But you amplify it 45 times, which is what the National Health Service in Britain and other places are doing, And you are going to get massive, massive numbers of false positives, which you're going to call cases.
So as I said in my speech at Trafalgar Square on Saturday, you use a fake test to secure fake cases To secure fake excuses for real fascism, lockdowns and other impositions because we are faced with these cases.
Now what I've described is why the overwhelming vast majority of people who test positive have no symptoms because there's nothing wrong with them.
This genetic material can be found in the bodies of, I mean, someone, one doctor said, if you amplify the PCR test enough, you'll reach a point where every single person that's tested will test positive.
So there is control of how many apparent cases you have.
It's ridiculous. Whether the virus exists or whether it doesn't is now entering the realms of irrelevance because even by the official figures the number of people who go from so-called infection with a test not testing for the virus to fatality Is according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in America, if you're under 70, now 0.004%.
Even with over 70s, it's 0.26%.
And for that, we have shut down the world economy and created enormous, this is the point, enormous dependency by formerly independent people and businesses on the state.
Well the response to thing just doesn't seem illogical.
I did read today that I think it's in the UK the average age of the person that dies from COVID is 81.
So we've shut down everything else for the elderly.
Getting back to the the PCR test you mentioned Can I just make one point?
Because people will be saying, well, people are dying.
Well, yes, I'm not saying people aren't dying.
But I'm saying, are they dying of COVID-19?
Now, we know for sure that of the vast, vast majority...
Of people who are said to have died on the death certificate of COVID-19 did not die of it at all.
They died of other things.
We've had people dying in motorcycle accidents, being hit by a bus, dying of cancer, dying of heart disease.
Because once you test positive with a test not testing for the virus, or a doctor says your symptoms are COVID-19, Whatever you die from, from that point on, COVID-19 is going on your death certificate.
I mean, we have a situation.
I mean, I would ask people watching this question.
If there is a real virus and it's really deadly...
First of all, we want to test people for a deadly virus.
It should be very obvious. But why would you in America, for instance, introduce, as soon as this started, a change in the payment system for American hospitals where they get paid $4,600 if they diagnose regular pneumonia?
$13,000 for every patient they diagnose COVID-19 pneumonia with the same symptoms, and $39,000 for every COVID-19 diagnosed patient they put on a ventilator, which has got a great chance of killing them anyway.
It's an absolute last resort, the ventilator.
And why would you have doctors, brave doctors, not enough, coming out around the world and saying how they're pressured to put COVID-19 on the death certificate when they know that's not the cause.
And now we're seeing mainstream medical operations like the CDC in America coming out and the Italian medical authorities and saying, well, actually, The number of people who we claim have died of COVID-19 is a tiny fraction of those that we've said have died of COVID-19 because they didn't die of it they died with it or rather with a positive test with a test not testing for the virus so the whole thing is a scam and you have to ask yourself why and years and years ago back in the 90s I came up with a phrase which I called problem-reaction-solution.
And there's another version of it which I call no-problem-reaction-solution.
And this is when you covertly create a problem or the illusion of one.
You then use the unquestioning mainstream media.
My God, have we seen that this year?
To tell the public the version of the problem or problem that you want them to believe.
And at stage two, after the problem, you want the public in fear.
You want them in outrage, whatever the problem is.
And you want them to say something must be done.
This can't go on. What are you going to do about it?
Or at least become open to the solutions you suggest.
And then... The punchline.
Those who've created the problem or the illusion of it got the reaction, do something, then openly offer the solutions to the problems they have created to transform society in a way they never could have got away with without the problem they have created.
Covertly created or the illusion of it they've created.
And that's summed up in a very short time what this fake pandemic is all about.
It's creating a massive illusion of a problem which they can then offer the solutions to and that has been to destroy the independent livelihoods of people.
It introduced a fascistic And police military state is what they want.
And to say that we've destroyed your lives, we've overturned them, and you can only go back to any kind of normality.
If you have a vaccine produced by a professional psychopath called Bill Gates...
Who says every man, woman and child on the planet has to be vaccinated with his vaccine for something that even if you believe it exists, the official figure under 70 is 0.004% from infection to fatality and 0.260%.
It's incredible.
Have a look at the flu figures For Australia, for 2019, then have a look at them for 2020.
2019 there, 2020 down here, because what's been happening, what do they say?
What are the symptoms of COVID-19?
Oh, they're flu-like symptoms, flu-like symptoms, which can have an endless list of possible causes, including the flu, by the way.
So what's happened is symptoms of flu-like have been redesignated COVID-19.
And that's why the flu numbers in 2020 have gone down as the COVID numbers have gone up.
You know, in South Africa, they're obviously in the Southern Hemisphere summer.
Or coming through the summer now.
Flu in 2020 in South Africa virtually disappeared.
In the province, which includes the biggest city, Johannesburg, and the capital, Pretoria, the last time I looked about two weeks ago, there was one case, one case of flu.
And yet, COVID-19, up there.
To support some of the things you're saying, I had a guest on recently, Senator Scott Jensen from the US, also a doctor of 40 odd years.
And he's become highlighted, I guess, recently because he came out and claimed that he was encouraged, for want of a better word, to put COVID on death certificates.
And he was quite outraged by that.
And now he's under investigation for things he said, but basically that's why it's come out because of that.
He also, and you mentioned about the PCR testing.
There was a doctor in England, very quickly, who went public in the media, and he said he knows that other doctors have been putting COVID-19 on death certificates for every cause of death since early March.
This is where the figures are coming from.
Yeah, and then there was the other thing about the PCR testing and you mentioned it.
So the amplification is typically, he was saying, 33 times.
And we're now doing it 40 plus times.
And the difference of that is amplification by billions as opposed to amplification by trillions.
And he was saying that the medical fraternity is like, why are we doing this?
And I asked him, why are we doing that?
Why do we suddenly go from 33 to 40?
And his answer was really, that's a million dollar question.
But obviously, one thing it does do is it does make the numbers increase.
We know that. That's one thing it's going to do.
And by the way, as I mentioned earlier, mate, in Britain, they're going to 45.
And so it's to get the cases, the illusion of cases, that's why almost everybody has no symptoms when they test positive, the illusion of cases to justify more and more fascistic lockdown and control, to justify masks, which are incredibly cumulatively dangerous to health, while claiming that they're there to protect health.
Everything's an inversion when you're dealing with the network that I've been exposing to.
For 30 years. And so there was a lab, a state lab in New York and another lab in Massachusetts that came out with some figures that were reported in the New York Times, actually, that if you amplify the PCR test, say, 40 times and then amplify it 30 times, Then almost all your, in terms of the Massachusetts lab, it was 85 to 90% of your positives at that high amplification are negatives at the normal amplification.
It's an amazing scam that's going on and it's being globally coordinated because it's a global web that's behind the manipulation of world events.
And I believe when the family doctor gets notified that their patient has tested for COVID, they don't get advised at what point of amplification did they test positive.
They don't know whether it was 23, 33 or 43, which makes a big difference, certainly in treating the patient.
So what surprised me when all this happens with COVID is how two things.
One is that the chief medical officers around the world suddenly had total control.
Governments and elected representatives were saying, no, we're going on the advice of the chief medical officer.
The second thing that I saw happen was there didn't appear to be any global coordination of the response, not in the early days, but every government went down a similar sort of path.
It's like lock them down, do this, do that, even though it wasn't a coordinated, well, appeared to be not a coordinated effort initially.
Those two things strike me.
And the third thing, of course, rather than protect the vulnerable and quarantine for another word, better than another word, the vulnerable, the elderly, We quarantined and locked up the healthy.
Those three things just didn't make any sense to me and still doesn't.
No, it doesn't at all. But what you say there is very relevant.
It was globally coordinated.
It is globally coordinated.
But not between governments.
You know, this is what I've been exposing all these decades.
There is a global web and there's a spider at the center of the web.
I call it the spider for symbolism.
And the spider is driving the global agenda.
And it works like a transnational corporation where you have a headquarters somewhere in the world of the corporation.
And then in each country, there are subsidiary networks of the corporation, which answer to their headquarters.
So if you go into a McDonald's anywhere in the world, you're pretty much going into the same McDonald's.
This is the principle. And this global web works like that.
So in each country, Australia will absolutely be a case in point.
You have this network of secret societies, semi-secret groups that are working to impose in their sphere of influence, their country, the agenda dictated By the spider at the center, which is operating from the shadows.
Now, when you bring up the point of chief medical officers, that's absolutely spot on, because this is how it works.
The World Health Organization was created by the Rockefeller family.
And if the Rockefeller family created, it's bad for humanity.
And the idea was that they focus control of the world health system under one roof.
And the guy who owns the World Health Organization now, through funding, its biggest funder, is Bill Gates.
And Ted Ross, the Director General of the World Health Organization, who declared the pandemic, has been on the board of massively Gates-funded organizations before he became Director General.
When Ted Ross speaks...
Gates is speaking.
When Gates is speaking, this spider web is speaking.
So what happens?
You can see it all the time.
It's so obvious. The World Health Organization announces new recommendations from a central point.
And then the governments of the world, through the chief medical officers, then announce that they are changing what's being imposed upon the people because of recommendations from the World Health Organization.
You control the World Health Organization, you control the whole system, in effect.
And we've had a very telling example of this in times in Britain.
The World Health Organization came out and said that it reckoned masks be worn by children over 12.
Within two days, 48 hours or less, Nick Virgin, the tinpot dictator of Scotland, said we are now bringing in a law that children over 12 have to wear masks.
Why? Because of new recommendations from the World Health Organization.
This was followed by Johnson in Britain very, very soon afterwards, justified by the same thing, new recommendations from the World Health Organization.
So you control that, and Gates does.
And you control what happens in country after country after country.
This is where the coordination has come from.
Not between governments, but actually directed at governments from a central point.
And so the whole thing in China, if you notice, we were shown pictures in China of people just in the street.
That's not happened in the West with apparently the same virus.
And we were shown these incredibly draconian lockdowns.
We were shown hospitals being built in a matter of 10 days or so because of this pandemic.
And then, bang, soon as it started moving into the West, or the illusion of it, I would say, did, through the same process of symptoms that have endless other causes and this PCR test, suddenly, China was okay.
You know, have you seen pictures from Wuhan recently?
It's party time!
They're not social distancing.
They're having massive concerts in Wuhan.
It's all like it's never happened.
All the hospitals were built, all been shut down.
But the point I've made since March, the key to it was to make the Chinese lockdown, China being a master of this cult, they were behind the Mao revolution.
And what they've done in China since then, behind the wall of control, Is make China the incubator of the system to play out globally of total control, not least through technology.
And so what you've seen since this kicked off, this fake pandemic, is the West has become more and more and more like China.
Because it's nothing to do with the Chinese people.
They're victims of all this stuff.
I'm talking about the Chinese government, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of this global cult.
And it has incubated this model of societal control to be played out globally, which is what it's done.
It's very appropriate that this thing kicked off in China.
But it had to be that these fierce draconian lockdowns were the way to deal with it.
Another way they said you must deal with it is test, test, test.
Come from Tedros. All the medical officers test, test, test.
Why? They know the more you test the more fake cases you're going to get to justify more draconian measures on the population.
So as soon as China...
Introduce the draconian impositions.
Tedros was coming out, Gates was coming out and saying, oh, the way to deal with this crisis in the West is the way that China's dealt with it.
And so it became the blueprint.
And it was all planned.
It's all planned a very, very long time ago.
Six weeks before...
This pandemic, quote, appeared in China.
Bill Gates and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, which is an absolute epicenter of the 1%, and the Johns Hopkins University medical operation, they ran a simulation of of a coronavirus pandemic just weeks before it came for real.
And what that simulation envisaged is exactly what has unfolded.
And by the way, the global counting of the cases from the PCR test, not testing for the virus, and the death numbers I've been compiled ever since this started by the same John Hopkins University medical operation that took part in that pandemic simulation.
I did see that simulation and it was very interesting the timing of it and how close it is to what's happening today.
The numbers, I always thought the more you test the more the numbers are going to go up, that's obvious.
But then in some countries we've seen where what they base a lot of things in is hospital beds.
Can the hospital cope with the capacity?
So hospital beds was a number one measure.
The second measure was ICU. And can the ICU department cope with it?
I saw in Minnesota recently harsh restrictions was all based on that.
I don't know whether the hospitals weren't inundated with patients and ICU, but I saw they started not showing those statistics.
Those stats were no longer available.
I think they might have overturned that recently, but it just highlights that the statistics So different the the modeling we keep hearing about changes day by day The modeling is different country by country state by state We I don't know what's happening in the UK there David, but in Australia Australia seems to be fractioning.
We've got States that are going alone with their own Recovery path others are locking down borders Victoria is becoming a military state And above everything else that's happening, what this is doing, it's breeding more distrust.
Distrust in governments, distrust in large organizations, but also, sadly, distrust with one another.
We are now...
Yeah, that's the idea. Driving people apart.
That's what social distancing is about.
Not to do with health. It's to do with driving people apart.
That's what the masks are about.
Masks are deleting individuality.
They're dehumanizing people, passing people in the street they know but not recognize them because they've both got masks on.
The masks are also...
There was a study in Germany recently of a mask worn by a child for eight hours.
And what they found was 82 what they call bacterial colonies and mold colonies in that mask.
The mask is also stopping the body, expelling carbon dioxide, and we're breathing it back in.
And it's not getting enough oxygen in.
Now, cumulatively, that is going to cause respiratory problems.
Illness and disease.
And what they're going to do is call that COVID-19.
They ought to call it mask 19.
But going back to what you said, first of all, if you want to get rid of the COVID crisis, you do two things.
One, you stop testing people.
With a test not testing for the virus.
And two, you stop faking the death certificates by putting COVID-19 on when they've died of something else.
That will end the whole thing overnight.
In terms of the hospitals...
I was writing a book called The Answer from last October and I was coming towards the end of it by the time this kicked off and in the first 80% or so of the book I described the world that this network wants to impose on humanity and then after the pandemic hoax kicked in they have actually rolled out all that I've said in the first 80% of the book was the plan and I've I've got two very substantial chapters, which absolutely demolished the official narrative.
And two weeks ago, I did a seven-hour live stream, which you can see on Iconic.com or DavidIke.com, where I put all these dots together and how it all fits.
Now, one of the things that you raise is Is the hospitals.
The hospitals were empty.
They were empty.
And they had security on them, so visitors couldn't go.
Kids were dying, have been dying without their parents, not of COVID, of other things, because they weren't allowed in.
So there was fierce security on the hospitals.
But some...
What I call citizen journalists did get into hospitals around the world with cameras to film.
I talked to medical staff, a lot of them over the months, who say, look, The hospital's never been so empty.
Whole floors have been shut down.
Nurses that aren't on full-time contracts, which have to be fulfilled, they've been laid off.
Doctors have been laid off.
And so people have been dying, and will go on dying, of things like cancer, undiagnosed and untreated, heart disease, undiagnosed and untreated, and many other things.
Because they... I mean, we've reached a point...
Where you see news articles where it says that children have died because their parents were too frightened to take them to hospital because of fear of COVID-19.
The number of people that have died because of the lockdown is fantastic.
If you look and they're there to see, you look at the graphs.
In country after country, there is either on a par death rates with other years or lower.
And then lockdown, and suddenly they spike with lockdown.
It's lockdown that's killed large numbers of people, not least very, very large numbers of old people around the world.
Because we have been approached at davidike.com by people working in elderly care homes who've described literally what they describe as murder.
Where soon as someone in the home is designated COVID-19 with a test not testing for the virus, and even, they say, they don't even bother with the test, they just say all symptoms.
So then the whole care home is designated a COVID-19 danger zone, and they describe how doctors stop coming.
So one of them, an English worker in a care home, said, We're just begging for antibiotics for other conditions, but we can't get them.
Doctors won't come. And this is where all the deaths have come from.
This is why if you look at the World Health Organization figures, you should also question them as well.
But if you look at it from an official point of view, the vast, vast, vast number of people who've died from COVID-19 have been old people because of this.
And this is another question.
Why does this virus, they want to change this, they want to start giving the illusion that it's affecting young people now.
You watch this, not least because of the masks.
But up to this point, it's virtually not touched young people.
It's killed old people, they say.
And the older you are, I mean, the average age of dying from COVID-19 is very, very elderly.
And so why is it killing old people and not young people?
Well, I'll tell you the key reason.
Because young people generally don't die.
So you can't redesignate what they've died of, COVID-19, because they ain't dying.
Old people are dying all the time of many and various things.
In fact, often, no matter what the problem is, it usually ends up what kills them is some form of respiratory problem.
And so you have endless potential to redesignate the deaths of old people, COVID-19.
But if we then come round to the point you've just made, because very relevant point, I've been writing about this for years.
The plan, and I'm going back decades when I first started writing about this, the plan is to create a world structure of top-down control, which involves a world government, which in the end would not be elected.
There will be technocrats, bureaucrats, medical technocrats, Engineers, scientists, etc., called a technocracy.
That's what they want. I mean, the technocrats of Silicon Valley have got more control than politicians already.
And under that, they want a world army to impose the will of the world government, a world central bank controlling all finance, which would, as I've been saying since the early 90s, would be purely electronic, no cash.
Look what's happened.
We're certainly heading that way.
Yep. Yeah, but what happened?
Just very quickly, what happened?
Very early on, when the thing was still coming out of China, in theory, Tedros at the World Health Organization said, you can catch this virus from money.
Best to use cards.
And in that one statement, bang!
Money disappeared on a vast scale.
The use of it disappeared.
But the newspapers were very quick to point out that although you can catch it from money, because the World Health Organization says so, you can't catch it from newspapers.
Why? Because we sell newspapers and not money.
So this structure...
As a world government, a world army, a world central bank, a world currency, and is designed to be controlled through AI technology and AI connection to the human mind, which they're already well talking about.
Under that, in this global structure, is meant to be a series of superstates, the European Union being the most advanced, and also trading groups with centralized control.
Now, here's the point, coming to the point that you raised.
Under that...
It's not designed to be countries.
I've been writing this since the 1990s.
The plan is to break countries up into regions so that you are de-unifying any unified response on a national scale to the edifice of power above.
And so what they are doing in Britain through the European Union, which we're supposed to have left, hello, Is bringing in, step by step, the regionalisation of Britain.
The regionalisation of England in particular.
And what they're now doing with Australia, exactly what you've described, it's the same thing.
They are moving Australia to a system of regionalisation, state control.
You've got Morrison, who's absolutely answering to this webinar.
I mean, because he was involved, his government, in banning me from Australia when I was due to come and speak in six cities in early 2019 to expose that this was the plan.
No wonder they banned me.
But he's basically a spectator, isn't he, to the states and people like Daniel Andrews, who absolutely must go before a Nuremberg-type trial eventually for crimes against humanity, but then so must a lot of other people, including Gates and these chief medical officers.
So this is why...
I say that what I've been writing about for 30 years was the plan.
I've been sitting here during this pandemic hope just ticking off the wish list which is all being used to justify including the imposition of the police military state and Victoria.
I rest my case.
So I guess the big question is Why and who?
So before you answer that, I have noticed that obviously the economies around the globe have come to a standstill.
But the mega rich appear to be still getting richer.
The ones getting poorer are now a larger amount because the ones that were quite wealthy, now not so.
So the money's getting into less hands, fewer and fewer hands.
But is this 1% as we call them?
Is this the ones behind this?
When we say this is what they are doing, who are they?
And secondly, why?
I mean, is it all about control?
Is that what this is all about?
In my books, I explained a big background, because this goes back a long time.
This goes back literally thousands of years.
It's a massive story.
We're only seeing the endgame, if you like, appearing before our eyes now.
It's that global web and that spider.
And that spider wants complete control of the world.
People say, oh, it's all about money.
Well, it's an offshoot.
I mean, these people are psychopaths.
They are obviously desiring of being extremely wealthy.
But, you know, The wealth is really the control.
For instance, if you look at freedom, what is freedom?
Freedom is the ability to make choices.
The more choices you can make, the free you are.
The fewer choices you can make, the less free you are.
And in the system and the structure that we've...
We've had imposed upon us.
Who has the money and who doesn't dictates to a vast extent who has choice, who has freedom and who doesn't.
So it's control of money is a major part of this control.
Now this brings me to this.
The... The structure that I've described for decades that this world is being taken towards, less weak.
Wake the hell up, is what I call the Hunger Games Society.
And if people just visualize a pyramid, at the top of the pyramid are a tiny few people.
We call them the 1%, but actually at the core of the core of the core, it's less than 1%, quite a bit less, that's actually really calling the shots.
And then at the bottom of the pyramid is basically the rest of humanity In servitude and control to the 1%, we'll call it, on the basis of dependency, dependency to survive.
And in between the 1% and the servile population, Is a police military state to impose the will of the 1% on the population and to stop the population rebelling against the 1%.
Now, look at the world now as a result of the last few months and then think that I was writing about that decades ago, that this was the structure.
Which brings me, because you bring up economics and the economic plight of people all around the world.
And why?
Because it's a result of lockdown, decisions taken to protect us from a virus which I say doesn't exist, but even if it does, its danger is negligible.
And so you asked the question, if you are going to put the population In servile dependency, thus control to the 1%, what do you have to do?
You have to destroy the independent livelihoods of the population.
You have to destroy independent businesses that the cult does not own.
And you have to destroy those employed in those businesses.
And so what's happened?
You rightly...
Make the point is that the businesses, the independent businesses and employment of the population have been absolutely destroyed.
And when we go into further lockdowns, because that's the idea, Those that have hung on by their fingertips are going to go under as well.
Suddenly, the population does not have independent livelihood anymore.
How's it going to pay the rent?
How's it going to put food on the table?
Well, because it has to look to the state.
And what the state is planning, again, this goes way back, and now they're talking about it as a result of all this.
They want to bring in a guaranteed income.
which will be tiny and survival level but there will be strings attached you will get your survival guaranteed income so long as you do is what we tell you as long as you do what you're told and we've had a wonderful example of that You know, in the run-up to this.
In Australia, with the no jab, no pay system.
In other words, you are dependent upon us, the state, who is owned by the cult, the global cult.
And so...
You are going to do what we tell you, or we're not going to give you any money.
And by the way, we've destroyed other ways of you earning money, so what are you going to do if you don't do what we tell you?
This is where it's going.
People like Daniel Andrews, he may not have two brain cells to rub together, from what I can see.
But these people are just puppets, willing puppets, but puppets of this cult, which is orchestrating all of it.
So if you look at Australia, the power to dictate all this in Australia has gone into the hands of the premiers.
You look in America, the power to impose all this has gone into the hands of the governors.
So you've got 50 governors in the United States who And the premiers of Australia.
And that's the number of people who, by law, legislation, are imposing their will on the population in terms of America of 330 million people.
You mentioned about the economics.
I want to take you back to that.
So I think it's been titled the universal minimum wage, something along the lines of that.
I know it was spoken about in the UK. I think Germany is actually trialing it somewhere.
What has also surprised me, and no one's really talking about it, maybe a bit now, but it's taken a long while.
Governments that had no money at all.
They couldn't buy an ambulance for the local medical and hospital, that sort of stuff.
Schools couldn't afford another school, couldn't afford another gym, whatever.
And now, throwing billions and billions of dollars out there.
And all of a sudden they've got billions to put on this project and billions to put on that project.
And no one's saying, well, where's this money coming from?
And who's going to pay it back?
And over what period of time?
But more importantly, where's this money coming from all of a sudden?
So is this a role that global banks are playing around the world behind the scenes here and loaning all this money out to all these governments and we've seen in the past sometime austerity measures are bought in so the governments can pay it back and all that.
Is this what's happening behind the scenes?
Well, exactly.
I mean, once you realize what's happening and the techniques used to make it happen, things that seem bewildering become perfectly explainable.
The global financial system and the global banking system is owned by this cult.
They created it.
Like I say, this is not something new.
It's just the stage it's now reached.
And I've been saying over the years, if it's the agenda, money no object.
If it's for the benefit of people, oh no, we can't afford that.
The agenda, how much do you want?
And so we're now seeing this so blatantly.
As you rightly express, where's the money coming from?
Well, it's coming from the banking system.
And it doesn't have to.
I mean, why are governments borrowing money from private banks and paying interest when they can create their own currency interest-free and circulated among the population interest-free?
Because the people that control the banks also control the governments, so they don't do that.
And so what's happening is that as the countries are paying out more and more money, I mean, in Britain, they're talking about a hundred billion pound process, program relating to coronavirus.
It's insane.
But with every new big spend, they are falling into more and more control, bankruptcy, To the banking system, which is owned by the cult.
So what happens?
And it's already happened, actually, in the past, not least through the money spent in the two world wars.
But we're now reaching this point of absolutely colossal debt.
I mean, what I saw the other day, Britain's now passed into two trillion pounds.
of debt and that means that the banks own the countries and the cult own banks.
This is where it's going.
The countries are being manipulated to spend themselves into bankruptcy and if you If you borrow money, actually you're not borrowing money, you're borrowing fresh air called credit, but if you're borrowing alleged money from a bank to buy a house and you can't pay it back, well the bank gets the house.
And if you're a country and you are in this phenomenal amounts of debt and you can't pay it back, Then whoever you owe it to owns the country.
This is where it's going.
We are mortgaging the world to a point where we can never pay it back.
And that means who we're mortgaged to become owners of the world, in effect.
All right, David. So we've talked about what's happening.
Let's talk about going forward.
I want to finish on a positive note.
So what do you believe we should be doing?
Those that believe in what you're saying and can see it for what it is and they want to make a positive step towards Preventing all these things happening and going to more of a society that we all want to be in, not a dictatorship type society, as you're suggesting. What do they need to do?
What do we need to do?
Well, first of all, if you look at what has broken every tyranny in human history, it's been self-respect.
Because self-respect says, I'm not doing it If it is designed to impose on my freedom and the freedom of my family.
And what is triggered by self-respect in those situations is what I call the power of no.
Non-cooperation with our own enslavement.
And what has happened all over the world?
I mean, it's a simple question.
At the core of the core of this global web, That's really driving this from the center.
You could get those people into a single room.
And there's getting on for 8 billion people in the world.
They cannot impose their will upon us unless the population acquiesce to their will.
And this is how it works.
If you imagine a pyramid, you've got the inner core of the cult at the top of the pyramid.
And it imposes its will on the next level of the hierarchy, which acquiesces to that will and imposes on the next level.
Now, very soon as you come down the pyramid, you're meeting levels of that hierarchy, national and global, that has no idea there is a cult or an agenda.
What they're doing is just doing what the level above them tells them to do, acquiescing to it and imposing it on the level below.
So you come down the pyramid, the human pyramid, with imposition, acquiescence, imposition, acquiescence, and then you meet the general population.
And if we acquiesce, To what the level of the hierarchy, i.e.
in this example, governments, law enforcement, if we acquiesce to their imposition on us, what we've done is We've completed a circuit of imposition and acquiescence which has allowed the tiny few at the top of the pyramid to impose their will on the entire human population.
And that's what we've seen over the last few months.
Three billion people cannot be put under house arrest unless they acquiesce.
There's simply not enough people to enforce it.
If people came out of their homes in vast numbers, vast numbers in Victoria today and refused to acquiesce, it would be over.
There's not enough police to enforce it.
But what happens is most of the enforcement is not necessary because the vast majority of the population just do whatever they're told.
This is how fascism is possible.
The Nazis couldn't have imposed their will on Germany without the vast acquiescence to that will by the population.
And so the answer is not to find a solution that usually leads to more problems.
It's to remove the cause of the problem.
And the cause of the problem that allows the few to control the many is the few acquiescing to the will of the many.
Sorry, the many acquiescing to the will of the few.
And the few authority has no power.
It has no power. The only power it has is our power which we give to it.
And so all around the world, not least in this country, they are orchestrating the population to police The rest of the population, Stasi-like in East Germany, because they don't have the numbers.
They have to recruit law enforcement from the target population to impose their will on the target population, and now they're recruiting more and more people from the population to impose upon the population.
We're calling them in this country COVID marshals, going around imposing the COVID rules and stuff.
And so just look at it in terms of numbers.
If humanity wants to be free, it can be free today.
It just stops acquiescing with its own enslavement.
Doesn't mean it doesn't follow rules and regulations that make sense, that protect people.
But when it is clearly there to impose the will of the few on people for means of control only, Then what are we acquiescing to that for?
What are we putting masks on for?
Well, if you did, you know, 10 minutes of research, you'd see, A, it's a big danger cumulatively to your health, and the holes in masks are much bigger than minute, minuscule viral particles anyway.
So then they're bloody useless.
But most people don't do that.
They just get their information from the usual sources, and they believe it, and they'll say, oh, you don't believe what politicians tell you, as if they're bloody streetwise, and then they go and do it!
It's funny you should say that.
Well, it's not funny, but you said, oh, I don't believe what politicians say.
I remember, and don't believe what you're reading things, my father, he used to read the newspaper back to front.
There was no internet back in those days, of course, and TV was only quite new.
And he'd read it back to front, and that formed his worldview and his basis for any discussion or debate he'd have.
But you always say at the end of it, well, don't believe everything you read.
And I thought, you know, so you're based on everything that you believe on, on that, at the same time when it suits you saying, don't believe what you read.
You are so right.
That is how it all comes about.
Because that's the general rule.
It's not the exception you've just described.
And so...
People think they're streetwise, or like to think they are, when actually they're just repeating the official narrative.
And if you start from this basis, and I rest my case on the entirety of human history, authority lies to you.
That's what it does.
It's its job. So anything authority tells you, you need to question and see if it checks out.
And I'll tell you, after 30 years of doing it, it usually doesn't.
But instead, they just believe it.
And then, even worse, is they want to impose their belief, their unquestioned belief, upon people that don't want to accept it.
Oh, is that the police?
There's someone gone out their garden for the second time today.
That's against the rules.
You know, and a few people can't control the world.
That's how they do it. So, in answer to the question, you know...
What can we do? We can end this today.
We can end this tomorrow. And what's stopping it is two things.
The perception...and then there's the other group of people...
Not as large, but very significant.
Sorry, David. You just dropped out then.
You said there was two things.
You said the perception, and then your internet dropped out.
So maybe if you can just repeat yourself.
So there's two things, or two groups of people, that allow all this to happen.
One is a very large group who just believe whatever the government tells them about this virus and never question anything, just accept what they're told, which I find hilarious, personally, having researched it, because what we're told is so not true.
It's breathtaking. And there's another group, not as large, but very significant in number, Who can see that there's something not right here, that there's some kind of scam going on and they're being lied to and what's being said about this virus actually doesn't stand out.
But they still acquiesce because they're frightened of the consequences of not doing so.
And then there's another group of people, the smallest of the group at the moment, which we're trying to get larger and larger, Who can see it's a scam and are willing to stand up and say so and stop obeying its rules and regulations because they know that all those therefore is to control us and until the first two groups start reassessing a am I being told the truth?
No and the other What's going to happen if I go on acquiescing, even though I know it's the problem?
What's going to happen? We're going to go into global fascism.
That would make even the Nazis wince because of its technological element, its fundamental technological element.
And I said in this speech in Trafalgar Square on Saturday...
We are facing a massive challenge and it's going to take enormous courage and determination and fortitude to turn this around.
And that means the refusal To cooperate with our own enslavement.
And for some, there'll be consequences.
You know, I mean, I'll put the authorities in the eye very soon.
It has to happen because as they're closing the walls and I'm refusing to cooperate, we are going to look each other in the eye.
But fine, not a problem because I'm not acquiescing with fascism.
I will not do it. But the point is, if enough people did it, there would be no consequences.
You cannot enforce something on hundreds and hundreds of thousands and millions of people who won't cooperate with you.
It's just not going to happen.
And so, you know, the choice is ours.
The answer is there.
And the longer we wait to do that, the more extreme And the more difficult it's going to be to turn it back.
Alright David, I've got one final question for you.
And you probably touched on it a little bit there.
You said that at some point you and the authorities are going to have to look one another in the eye.
So my last question to you, you've been around for 30 plus years, travelled the world, speaking about this, written many books.
You're certainly a survivor.
And some have questioned, how has David Icke managed to survive all through this?
Why hasn't he been shut down?
I know your Facebook's gone and YouTube.
But David Icke is still out there.
He's still getting his message across.
How have you managed to continue fighting and to be that survivor?
Because there are other forces at work.
There are other forces at work that are working to unravel This global edifice of deceit and control.
The point is, those forces operate on particular frequencies of consciousness because every time we think, every time we emotionally feel, we are generating frequencies.
Every different kind of thought, every different kind of emotion is different frequency.
Joy, love is a high frequency.
Depression and anxiety is a low frequency.
So our state of being, our state of mind, consciousness, emotions, Are generating and operating on particular frequencies depending on what they are.
And this force that's behind this web of deceit, this spider, operates within a certain band of frequency.
And it's a very low band of frequency because of what it is.
That's why it does what it does.
And it seeks to pull humanity, in terms of the frequency it's operating on, into that band of frequency, into its stadium, if you like, which it controls.
And so they want you in fear, low frequency.
They want you anxious, low frequency.
In all these low vibrational frequencies of emotions, And they want you in a mental state of low-frequency perception.
And then they've basically got you.
They want you to believe, and that is part of the same thing, they want you to believe that you're just little me and have no power.
Because the more people think they're little me, because of cause and effect, what we believe we perceive and what we perceive we experience.
The dream is the dreamer and the dreamer is the dream.
If you think you are little me and have no power, that will transfer to a little me, no power life experience.
Not because it has to, but because your perception becomes your reality.
And going the other way, if we expand our consciousness out of these low frequency states, and if we perceive ourselves not as little me, some label, In a brief human life, but as the consciousness, ultimately the all-expansive consciousness, infinite consciousness, that is having the brief experience as a human, and that consciousness which will leave when the experience is concluded, then we're operating on a completely different frequency.
And more than that, we're tapping in to...
Massively expanded states of consciousness and other forces that operate in that frequency.
And so you can get insight, you can get inspiration, you can be guided through the maze when you do that.
Not David Icke sitting cross-legged on a mountain.
Anybody can do that.
But we've got to break out of these bubbles of manipulated limitation.
It's like the Buddha is quoted as saying, the mind that perceives limitation is the limitation.
The perception of limitation is the limitation.
I don't have that. I let that go a long time ago.
I'm all that is, has been and ever can be.
All possibility. Having a brief human experience.
And so are you and so is everybody that most people have just forgotten because they've been manipulated to forget.
Try controlling billions of people who know the magnitude of who they are.
So I said in an interview, right at the start of this in March, which got a lot of views around the world, I said, I'm more powerful than the cult.
And I am. And anyone can be.
That's the point.
Because the very fact that they are the cult and they're doing what they're doing, that they're psychopaths, means they too are in a low-frequency state.
That's why they have to pull humanity into that state to control them.
I will not go there.
And I said...
Then that I have more power than they do and they'll show it and they have.
You see, when you're a cult and you own the banking system, you own the political system, you own the corporations, not only do you own the Silicon Valley internet giants, you created them.
And yet, one fella sitting in a little flat on the Isle of Wight off the south coast of England is deemed so dangerous to these all-powerful people.
Yeah, right. Little boys in short trousers, really.
It's odd to me. That they have to delete me from YouTube and delete me from Facebook.
They've got all that power, but they have to delete...
And look at all the other...
People they're deleting. Why?
Because perception is the stadium in which all this has played out.
Their narrative to create the perception collectively that they want is so ludicrous, not least on this virus, so insane and unsupportable that the only way they can protect it is by deleting other information, which is challenging that narrative and makes more sense to people.
I know that from experience when they hear it explained.
So, once you expand your awareness and you realize the nature of who you are, consciousness, potentially all consciousness having a brief human experience, not Ethel on the checkout or Bill driving the bus, they're just experiences.
Then everything changes.
It does. I'd love to go there and talk more about consciousness.
We've run out of time, unfortunately.
But something I picked up on what you said then is that this cult, if they're really out there and all that, they must be vibrating on low frequencies, as you said.
And so that's the key.
If they're on low frequencies and everyone just moves to higher frequency, how do we do that?
It's quite easy, really.
We just put love at the forefront of everything.
Exactly. If you put love at the forefront, if that's our thinking, then a lot of it will take care of itself after that.
Look, David, I have to go on.
People say when the cavalry are coming, we are the cavalry, and we need to realize that.
David, we certainly are.
We can change it if we want to.
If we just put love at the forefront, as I said, I think that would be a good start.
Thanks so much for being on my show on InView TV. It's been a pleasure.
Didn't even get a chance to talk about the protest on the weekend.
I know you were there, and so your son Gareth was as well.
Didn't have time for that. Maybe we'll get back another time on the show.
Definitely want to touch the consciousness side of things as well.
So thanks much, David.
Really enjoyed having you on the show.
Thank you. Thanks, mate.
▲
Export Selection