All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 6, 2020 - David Icke
01:06:51
Fake Tests = Fake Cases = Fake Reasons For Lockdowns - Mass Murder Of The Elderly - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
so so
Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the David Icke Dot Connector video cast.
It feels like weeks and weeks and weeks since I've spoke to my dad, but I'm pretty sure it's only a week.
We're going to cover two massive, massive topics today.
The first one is the new lockdown being introduced all over Britain and indeed all over the world based on fake tests, not deaths.
And another thing which is huge, which we're going to focus on, is a lot of the stories coming out from care homes and basically the mass murder that's going on in care homes, something that we were speaking about months ago, but it's now coming to light.
Dad, how are you, mate? I'm good.
You've... You're a bit closer to me now, aren't you, this week?
I'm in Mum's spare room, which, believe it or not, was once my room, and I'm looking at it, and you couldn't swing a mouse in here, so I don't know how on earth I lived in it, but there you go.
But yeah, so I'm on the road, basically, so yeah, Mum's spare room.
I shared a bedroom with my brother Paul when I was a kid, and the room weren't much bigger than the one you're in, so I know what you mean.
Yeah, it is like a shoebox, but still, it didn't feel like that at the time, so that's alright, isn't it?
But yeah, I'll start this walking series tomorrow, so it's why I'm down south.
It's why I've grown a bigger beard as well, because apparently you can't cover any long distance unless you've got a funny hat, a stick and a beard.
So I'm hoping that'll help me on all the miles I'm going to be walking.
Well, you've got all of them, mate, haven't you?
That's it, isn't it? That's it.
Yeah, ticking the boxes. So let's start with these tests because it's getting absolutely insane.
Yesterday, Aberdeen was shut down based on five tests, positive tests, I believe it was, no deaths, something insane like that.
Australia doesn't even bear thinking about.
They've gone full on Nazi Germany.
It's madness. I've got friends that emigrated out there that have had this wonderful life that are now messaging me going, this is hell.
Well, there are so many confirmations of the utter madness that's going on.
But of course there's method in the madness.
It's being done for a specific reason, the total global fascism.
That's where it's heading and we're getting there very fast.
But there can be few greater confirmations of the madness than they are testing people for a virus with a test that's not testing for the virus.
And when they get positive From the tests not testing for the virus, they say we've got to lock down cities and areas because there are a spike or there is a spike in the number of cases of the virus.
That's where we are.
I've been pointing out for months that the RT-PCR test is not testing for a virus, a virus they've never isolated and purified to show it even exists.
And more and more people are coming in this direction now.
Yeah, yeah.
Where is the evidence that it exists?
And here we are now.
Having whole cities locked down and areas locked down, like I say, on the basis of positive tests for a test not testing for the virus.
Now, the people ultimately behind this know that.
But we can no longer Give the benefit of the doubt to people like Boris Johnson and the health secretary Matt Hancock or this tin pot dictator in Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon. We can no longer give them the benefit of the doubt that they're making these ludicrous, crazy, insane decisions.
Because they're being bounced into them by dark suits in the background.
The medical and psychological technocrats.
Because it's gone on too far.
Enough information is circulating to show what's really going on.
And it's no longer an excuse.
And must never be allowed to be an excuse from these people.
Oh, we were just following the science we didn't know.
And the next stage of this insanity has been introduced this week with the UK government announcing, and this will be global, new 90-minute coronavirus test, which will be the same bollocks Producing the same fake cases, only more of them now, dramatically more.
Because this RT-PCR test is testing for a genetic material that ultimately, if you amplify it enough, everybody has.
So ultimately, if you amplify it enough, everyone's going to test positive.
How many do and how many don't depends on the amplification of the test.
What we have now is an on-steroids version of what we've had so far.
Because we're going to have more and more people testing with this 90-minute test.
And a lot of them are going to test positive.
And they're going to go on the number of cases.
And they're going to say, oh, look at the cases have gone up.
We've got to lock down this area now.
And the...
Infection, even if you believe the virus exists, it doesn't.
But even if you do believe it, the infection to fatality rate, even according to the mainstream estimates, if you're under 70, it's 0.004%.
And if you take everyone into account, it's 0.26%.
And every time they have a new case, which they go, oh!
Every time they have a new case with no symptoms, which pretty much all of them now, that ratio of infection, official infection, not real, to fatality gets smaller and smaller and smaller.
But instead of seeing that as a positive thing, even according to their ludicrous way that they are telling us the virus exists and how they're testing for it, instead of celebrating, which should be good news, they're using this to lock down cities and to impose even more draconian impositions on the population.
So this first test, oh, I've got a quote from Matt Hancock here.
I won't read it. It's bound to be bollocks because he's saying it, so I'll pass by that.
Test number one is the Rapid Lampor test.
It's being released next week and will involve taking a swab for a saliva sample.
Wait for it.
Can't believe it.
Similar to the widely used PCR test kit, which is not testing for the virus.
And neither is this.
But they go, oh, I'm positive.
Oh, lockdown. Using technology developed by Oxford Nanopore...
The test specifically identifies and amplifies the virus in the swab.
And how much they amplify it dictates how many positives that they have.
And it's a computer program.
These will be processed by a desktop machine called a gridiron.
Now, test two. The second test will be rolled out next month and involves testing DNA for the virus.
Well, how can you test DNA for a virus that you've not isolated and identified its entire code, genetic code?
You can't. Anyone with alpha brain cell who's looked at this knows you can't.
And these people are telling us you can.
Developed by DNA nudge.
Now nudge is a code word for all this stuff.
Because nudge is about nudging, on one level anyway, people's behavior down the channel of behavior you want.
So you have the cabinet office in Britain.
That has a private company, or part owns it anyway, called the Behavioural Insights Team, which is generating all this psychological behaviour modification through social distancing and masks.
It's not to do with health, it's to do with psychology.
And it's known as the Nudge Unit, because they're nudging behaviour.
To transform the behavior of the population.
And this all comes from a book by a couple of people.
One was called Cass Sunstein, who was a, quote, czar to Obama and a guy called Thaler.
They wrote a book called Nudge, which was all about this.
So it's kind of interesting that this test is being produced by a company called DNA Nudge.
And one of the things they're trying to do, as I've said so many times, if you want to use this term, Is Nudge DNA. Change it.
This vaccine, the Gates vaccine, is going to be a DNA manipulating vaccine.
So developed by Nudge or DNA Nudge, thousands of machines called Nudge Boxes We'll be deployed to analyze nose swabs for COVID-19 within 90 minutes.
And Professor Chris Tumazu, CEO and founder of DNA Nudge, praised his company's test for being able to bypass the use of a laboratory and hasten the process.
He said, with the ability to test not only for COVID-19, but also for flu A, And Fleubian RSV on the same single COVID-19 nudge cartridge.
Our multiplex test offers a vital solution to protect the National Health Service as we head into the flu season.
Have you noticed, guys, how they're focusing more and more on flu, more than they do normally, because they want this, what they say, 30 million people to have a flu vaccine in Britain, and the flu vaccine is being pushed around the world.
So what's in the flu vaccine and what will be the knock-on effects of that?
In terms of where this goes with health and testing.
Anyway, interestingly, the co-founder and CEO, I've just mentioned him, of DNA Nudge is Professor Chris Tumazu.
So who is he, pray?
He's Professor of Engineering, Chair in Biomedical Circuit Design, Director of the Centre of Bio-Inspired Technology, and Founder and Chief Scientist for the Institute of Biomedical Engineering at...
Imperial College.
Imperial College, which produced the computer models through people like Professor Neil Ferguson that were ludicrous in their death projections, proved to be so, and as a result of them, the lockdown was justified.
So it's a very, very small world, as well as a mad world, that we clearly live in.
That's the one point that people, I keep asking people, because I've said to you before, I'll often in conversations just go with, alright, okay, well let's go with your opinion that there's a virus then.
Let's go with your official statistics then.
And talk to them on that level and say, why aren't people dying then?
Like, why aren't they dying anymore?
Why are weekly deaths in England and Wales below the weekly average for coming up to the seventh week in a row?
Can you explain that?
Well, no one's got an answer.
And you say, okay, well, they're shutting down Greater Manchester.
They're planning on shutting down London again outside the M25. They've shut down Aberdeen, shut down Blackburn.
How many people have died?
No one's died in Scotland, even on their official nonsense, for days and days and days and days.
Why aren't they dying anymore?
Well, yeah, but...
And there's no answer to it.
I find it infuriating, Dad, because it's such a simple question.
Why was COVID-19...
Why was it a deadly virus during flu season and how it's not anymore?
What happened to it?
Did it mutate into just being all right?
Well, what happened, or a major part of what happened, is the potential to diagnose other causes of death, particularly respiratory, COVID-19, which is what they've been doing all along, falls in the summer in the Northern Hemisphere.
That's what we're in now. Because fewer people die of respiratory disease, about 80% less respiratory disease in the summer months.
So they've just moved to cases.
And the fact that they are locking down cities and areas on the basis of cases, no symptom cases, means that it is blatantly obvious to anyone who's not in complete denial And many still are, of course, that this is a scam and they're lying to us.
And there's no way that Sturgeon and Johnson and Hancock at the political level of this don't know they're lying to us.
And of course, the dark suits have been lying to us in the background all along.
The technocrats have never seen a ballot box in their life.
And so the reason that people In the way you describe, are defending.
I see it all the time. You challenge with serious factual evidence what's going on.
And it doesn't stand up to any level of scrutiny.
And people start defending the authorities.
It has to be a mass version of Stockholm Syndrome.
The mentality where when people are, you know, taken into captivity by terrorists or violent groups, they end up being apologists for those groups.
And that's what we're looking at.
We're looking at mass Stockholm Syndrome.
And one of the reasons for that Is people in large numbers, a lot of people are going the other way, which is great, but large numbers of people simply do not want to face the fact that we are being lied to on such a scale because they don't want to face the fact that we are watching, minute by minute now, The unfolding and imposition of national and global fascism, which I've been warning was coming for 30 bloody years.
And so the more people go into this denial, they don't want to face this, the more they will basically firewall their mind off from Looking at the facts that we're being lied to on a staggering scale, they'll firewall that away by finding some excuse for why it's happening that doesn't include the fact that what we're looking at is the unfolding of global fascism.
I had an example outside a farm shop the other day.
There were two women out the front who, I said in another interview, looked like they were a pair of bandits about to raid the place.
It was hilarious, really.
And I started talking to them because I wasn't going in the shop, obviously.
Although I have been since without a mask.
And so anyway, I'm talking to them.
And I'm talking about the masks.
I'm talking to them about the contradictions.
And every time they were defending it and defending it, and I hit them with some evidence that demolished what they were saying.
And they were running out of explanations for why it was going on, because they were repeating the official explanation.
And it all ended with one of the ladies saying, well, I like my mask.
In other words, any excuse will do to not look at the truth that's before us, which is we are looking at a global version of Nazi Germany, and if we go on acquiescing, they will complete the job.
We've spoke before about it, and 9-11's another one.
That was a prime example of people just not wanting to face reality.
And I remember saying, it's kind of like if you tell a mate that you've seen his wife having an affair, that he will attack you for telling him.
And it's very much like that.
We're going to obviously focus a little bit later on the fact of what's happening in nursing homes and stuff like that, which is disgusting.
But for me, when I look at the fact that we're coming on seven weeks now in England and Wales with...
Deaths underneath the weekly average over the last five years.
So less people are dying in the last seven weeks.
We're in the middle of a pandemic, apparently.
They're shutting down cities and towns.
And there's a simple explanation for it in my mind.
And that is, you can't die twice.
So if you're in a nursing home, or you need treatment and stuff like that, you've got three months to live, four months to live, probably.
Maybe a little bit longer if you've got the treatment or whatever.
And then they pull out the treatment, which is what they've done.
And they shut down nursing homes.
They stop visitors. So you're not allowed to see your family anymore.
So basically, you kind of give up, really.
You can't get the drugs that you need.
You can't get the care that you need.
Some of them are nil by mouth, which is going to focus on later.
You're starving them to death.
I mean, what the fuck? You die in April.
Well, if you were probably going to die in July, because you kind of had four months left or whatever, you can't die twice.
So over the year, there won't be these massive excess deaths that they say, oh my God, look at that spike.
Well, that spike happened because you just let a load of people die.
And you took, I'm trying to remember the number now, I remember it being high 50,000s, I think, of people out of hospital that were there and put them back in nursing homes.
So like I say, they're going to die.
So you get this spike in April.
Oh my God, it's dreadful, isn't it?
So then surely, now we're in August, you've got to be looking and just saying, well, hang on.
And to me, that seems like a simple explanation of why these deaths are beneath the weekly average.
Yeah, plus the fact that, of course, there are going to be ongoing people dying who possibly, quite possibly, would not have died.
They had diagnosis and treatment earlier, which was denied them by closing down the hospitals and the A&E in effect.
And on the other side, so terrifying the population that they wouldn't go to hospital.
And when we come to the over 50s or the elderly situation, There's a very good reason now, very good reason, to stay out of hospital as much as you can for reasons that are going to become very clear and are very, very sinister.
But I just want to mention, while we're on the test and the fake test for so-called COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2, Which is producing the cases.
They produce the cases with a fake test that's not testing for the virus, which they've never shown to exist.
And they produce the deaths by diagnosis redesignation for people dying of other things.
That's the scam.
That's the whole foundation of it.
And I was looking at this again this week.
It's from the Bulgarian Pathology Association.
And what it's doing is pointing out Very clearly at the top, COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless.
It goes on to point out, as I have many, many times, that Tedros, this totally corrupt Gates frontman, who's the Director General of the World Health Organization, who said on March the 16th, We have a simple message for all countries.
Test, test, test.
Why? Why does Hancock in Britain say we need testing, testing, testing, and Fauci and people like that in America, etc., and others around the world?
Because they know this test is not testing for the virus.
It's testing for a genetic material that vast numbers of people have, ultimately with enough amplification everyone has.
And thus, the more you test, the more you're going to test positive, and the more you can claim the number of cases that there are, and we have to, oh, we're all infected, oh my God, close down cities, and so on.
But they go on, this...
Report by the Bulgarian Pathology Association to point out that the PCR test, something I've been saying for months, is a joke.
It's not testing.
It's not a joke in what it does because it's meant to do what Carey Mullis, the creator, created it to do.
But it's a joke in what they're claiming it does, which even Carey Mullis, the creator, said it must not be used for, and that's diagnosing infectious disease, which is what they're doing with it, because they know it will produce cases, fake cases, which they can then use to terrify the population.
But it goes on to this point.
There is no proof for the RNA Of what is being tested for.
Of being viral in origin.
And it points out, again, what I've been pointing out for months.
And people like...
Dr. Andrew Kaufman in America have been pointing out for a very long time, one of the people that really nailed this whole area.
In fact, probably the person that nailed it to start with.
And that is that this virus has never been purified and isolated and shown to exist.
And what this report does, it goes to Scientific studies, the scientists that made them, saying all this virus exists and we've shown it to exist and all that stuff.
And they've asked them a simple question, which is, have you ever purified and isolated the virus?
So that only the virus exists, no other contamination, nothing else.
Have you ever done that?
Which is absolutely what you have to do to show that an infectious agent exists and causes what you say it causes.
Study number one, reply.
The image is the virus budding from an infected cell.
It is not purified virus.
Study two, answer, we could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.
Exactly what I've been explaining for weeks.
Study three, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.
And study four, we show an image of sedimented virus particles not purified ones.
It hasn't been done.
And this, we are told, justifies all that's happened to transform global society because of a virus they've never shown to exist.
The madness couldn't get any madder.
But if only, A, people did their own research, they'd find this out.
And B, of course, the mainstream media won't talk about this.
And if you talk about it on the It's interesting you say that actually about the media and stuff because last week when I was on holiday we were staying in like a caravan park thing and so the internet was shocking.
So I had not really a hell of a lot of access.
I could go out onto the balcony, I could get a little bit here and there, a little bit of signal here and there, but generally it was pretty rubbish.
And every now and then I'd just pop the telly on, just see what was happening, just while people were getting showered and ready to go out and stuff.
And so the mainstream news was on.
And in the end, it was just, oh, piss off.
So I ended up turning it off.
And if you don't go and do your own research and you don't Have access to anything or choose not to have access to anything other than the mainstream media.
You would think that we were in the middle of an absolute, you know, crisis that, oh my God, we're all going to, you know, are you sure you want to go out to that restaurant?
Because we're all going to die. And you're just thinking how many people are sat in their homes watching that?
And that's the only access they've got.
And they've not even thought about going elsewhere and looking at other information and even going, you know, oh, no one's dying because they don't say that on the news.
Like, that's something I noticed as well.
They don't talk about the fact that deaths are down below this weekly average.
The fact that people aren't dying of COVID-19 anymore, even by their bollocks.
The fact that in Scotland, people haven't died for days and days and days.
They don't mention that on the news.
They just talk about this spike, this spike.
And people, if they don't have any sort of due diligence, will just go, oh my God, it's a spike in deaths.
They won't look, well, no one's died.
All right, we'll just carry on then.
Which is an obvious scam.
And another thing In terms of the propaganda, you were saying about this test, test, test, test, test, and that's obviously what they want.
I saw a couple of things on Twitter that were obviously aimed at slightly younger people, and they were aimed at people that want to go to gigs and want to go and watch live comedy and musicians and comedians, people that want their lives back, you know.
Just saying, you know, and it was all this imagery of all these people having great fun at gigs and dancing and, you know, guys dancing with girls like, hey, how you doing?
And all this sort of nonsense saying, go get tested and you can get this life back.
And you're just like, oh, mate, you're not even subtle.
Well, you're not even subtle and you're not even sane.
But of course, like I say, those in the background pushing this know exactly what they're doing because it's all about behavior manipulation and perception manipulation.
So here's the deal.
And the NHS, the government in effect, has been putting out videos saying that with all these images of football matches with crowds and concerts, like you say, saying, oh, you know, let's get back to normal.
We've destroyed your normal.
We who are telling you, let's get back to normal.
And all you've got to do to go back to normal is get tested.
And what happens when you get tested?
Lots of people are going to test positive for this genetic material, not the virus.
And as a result of the numbers increasing of positive tests, new normal is going to be imposed even more in a draconian way.
And we're not going to go back, the very opposite to what they're claiming, to go back to the old normal they're trying to sell you.
You know, when the history of this is written, if we, you know, stop acquiescing and bring an end to this nonsense and have a chance of writing a true version of history.
And I've written a whole section about this in my new book, The Answer.
When the history is written, the mainstream media Well, let's put it as mildly as I can.
Will not come out smelling of roses, but something with a rather more pungent stink.
Because without the mainstream media's acquiescence, this could not have been pulled off.
Because the official narrative is so nonsensical It can only be protected by lying mainstream excuses for journalists and by censorship of those outside mainstream journalism who seek to unravel and expose the nonsense.
And there was an article this week I saw by what was called a veteran television producer Who described the mainstream media as a cancer and basically with no cure.
And that's what the mainstream media is.
It's a cancer. And it's eating away at human discourse.
It's eating away daily at human freedom.
And how those people shave in the morning, or the men shave in the morning, And how the women put the makeup on looking in the mirror, I have no idea.
I mean, how do you shave while averting your eyes because you can't stand looking yourself in the eye?
Because surely you wouldn't if you do what they've been doing.
And my God, man, how do they look at their children and grandchildren in the eyes whose lives they are systematically destroying Whose freedom they're systematically destroying by lying through their teeth and every other orifice, minute by minute, day after day, week after week, to sell a lie that is turning the planet fascist.
My God, how they live with themselves, I don't know, but I suspect that large numbers of them sleep like a baby.
The mainstream media is a political organisation.
That's all it is. I think the same, to be fair, I think the same with the NHS. I think that's a political organisation.
Now, I saw a post the other day from the government talking about protecting the NHS. There's not been an NHS since March, mate.
It's not existed. It's literally not existed.
It's been a coronavirus health service which has just pushed and peddled propaganda and gagged nurses and doctors and made them sign non-disclosure agreements so they can't tell the people what's actually happening.
It's madness. And I said on a post yesterday, like, when it comes out, all of this, and I firmly believe it will, all of it, and when it does, because it will be like a snowball effect, I think.
I think it will get to a point, and I'll tell you what, I don't think it's that far away.
It's getting to such a point where actually they can't stop it anymore.
You're going to end up with something, you know, that can only be described as the Nuremberg trials, you know, for the people responsible for it.
People like Johnson and Sturgeon and Hancock in Britain and others of their like around the world, they must go to jail.
They have destroyed whole nations.
They have destroyed stunning numbers of lives and large numbers of people have died as a result of their decisions and impositions.
So that cannot, cannot, must not go and be let We were just politicians making decisions.
No, no, no.
You could claim that at the start.
Not anymore. And of course, talking of vast numbers of people dying as a result of their decisions and the decisions of people like them all around the world, in the United States and Europe and Australia and everywhere, we come to the The subject of literally, you know, no drama, truth, the mass murder of old people, which I've been predicting in my books for years and years and years was part of this plan to cull the population and particularly to cull the elderly.
And we are there big time, as the evidence shows.
We even did a whole podcast on it, early doors in this, in terms of what's happening in the care homes.
And we were saying then, from people that sent us messages, people I know personally as well that work in care homes, telling us what was happening.
And now that's coming out more and more and more.
As I think more and more people have just got to a point of like, nah, I can't sit around.
I can't do this anymore.
I've got to tell someone.
Just before we talk about the care home thing, another thing that's interesting is the spike in suicide.
That's gone up. That was over 200% spike in that.
I know people personally that have attempted it during lockdown.
I know people through one friend and other friends, so, you know, one away from me, that have died.
A friend of mine works in health and safety.
He went to do an evaluation yesterday and he messaged into our group saying he turned up to find that the landlord had slit his throat and burnt his pub down.
Why has he done that, I wonder?
Yeah, well, I talked there about politicians and journalists and how they must face responsibility for what they've done.
And that also applies to these psychologists in the behavioral insight team of the cabinet office that are driving the psychological manipulation, the nudge unit.
They must also face the consequences of what they've done because they're systematically manipulating the behavior of the population.
And there are very awful consequences, some of which you've described, for doing that.
They must take their responsibility for that and they must face the consequences.
But so must people working in the National Health Service and working in the medical services of all countries that have, A, played a part in...
Putting, for instance, COVID-19 on death certificates when they know the person hasn't died from that.
And for not coming out and speaking out and telling people, the public, what is going on behind all the propaganda.
Okay, I know it's difficult.
I know you've been told to sign non-disclosure agreements and all that.
But my God, we're talking about the imposition of global fascism.
You know, you're just going to sit there and privately say, oh, it's not really going on.
This is really going on. But you're not going to tell people.
And of course, this is the whole point.
If people in the medical profession came out en masse and told the truth, there would be no consequences for them because they can't fire everybody.
It's when a one or two come out, brave, courageous, decent people, and tell the truth, then they can pick them off.
But instead, all these people that know that we're being told a pack of lies are keeping their mouth shut for personal reasons.
What are the consequences for me?
Well, I tell you, all of you, journalists, politicians, medical professionals, the consequences of you not doing it, not least for your children and grandchildren, but everyone else now because we're in it, it's not coming, are absolutely catastrophic.
And you in the medical profession who have refused to speak out and tell us what's really going on so it can be exposed, you also will have to take responsibility for your silence.
And if we come to this whole story of mass murder of the elderly, you cannot divorce that from this that's just come out in the last few days.
Millions of over-50s could be told to stay at home under, quote, nuclear plans drawn up by Boris Johnson, drawn up by someone for Boris Johnson, after bubble bursts on easing lockdown.
Or we've had a spike in cases from tests, not testing for the virus.
A large number of over-50s could be given orders to stay at home as part of a nuclear plan to avoid another national lockdown.
Well, of course, that's what they want to avoid, yeah.
In a more segmented approach to dealing with future lockdowns, people aged between 50 and 70 would be given personalized risk ratings, taking into account factors like their age and conditions.
And asked to shield in the event of an outbreak.
The plans could prove controversial, blah, blah, blah.
Well, this is another stage.
And what they do, again, it's psychological.
What these governments do, not just with this, but lots of other things, is they feed out to the media on a non-attributable basis what they plan to do, especially if it's extreme.
Because they want the media to say, oh, governments are planning to do this, sources say.
And then they're listening and watching for the public reaction.
And if there's not pushback, and there has been pushback on this, then they introduce it.
And if there is pushback, they say, oh no, no, all things are being considered, but this is not among those things we plan to introduce.
And then they go back to the behavioral insight team network and say, we need more work to break down resistance to locking down 50 to 70-year-olds, etc. 70-year-olds and older.
And like I say, that cannot be divorced because it's all connected from this.
You mentioned the whistleblowers who've come out.
There was one, she's on the website now, in fact, putting it underneath this video.
Where she works at the care home and she's quoting someone else who wrote to her who works at the care home.
And what they say, not only is confirming, like you say, Gaz, we've been putting out for months, but it is grotesque beyond words how old people who have not even been tested for COVID-19 with a test not testing for it, but have other health problems.
They are denied treatment, they're denied doctor visits, and they're put on what used to be known as care pathways, where they basically reduce or even delete the drugs, food, and they let them die.
In fact, they make them die.
It's unbelievable.
We are watching globally the culling Of a whole, actually multiple generations of people who are called old or elderly.
And they're pulling it down with this thing now, even down to the age of 50.
Because they want to cull, it's been in my books for years, the population, especially the elderly.
And I do urge people just to watch that video that's with this one, to see the scale of what's going on.
No hospital treatment, no doctor visits, and they end up with nil by mouth.
They let them starve and dehydrate to death.
This is happening in so-called care homes all over the world.
And there are some brave, brave nurses in those care homes who are prepared to speak out.
Those who don't are complicit in what is nothing less than the calculated murder of old people.
And today, as we speak, I was sent an article by a freelance mainstream journalist, Jackie Devoy, who we both know.
And she sent me this article because a mainstream newspaper, in this case, The Telegraph, rejected publishing it.
And the headline I put with it sums it all up.
It's a cull of society's most vulnerable people.
In a single word, it's eugenics.
All patients over 60 automatically get a do not resuscitate order without them or any family members being consulted.
I have seen the forms in their files with my own eyes.
And they're the words of a doctor, which I'm going to quote in a second.
So Jackie Deboy describes our own experience of a loved one being put on a DNR order, which means that if you need...
Well, it speaks for itself, but let's just break this down so we see the magnitude of it.
It means that if you need resuscitation, they won't resuscitate you.
They'll let you die, even though you don't have to die.
And these do not resuscitate orders are being put on all old people without their knowledge.
And what it is, it is a means to eugenics.
That's what it is.
I've exposed in my books over the decades of how this elite, this cult I exposed, they're all into eugenics.
And what it means is they can let anyone die they like because all they have to say is, well, there was a do not resuscitate order and he required resuscitation.
So let's look at this part of the article.
You can see it on babydike.com.
Jackie says, I decided to speak about do not resuscitate orders to a consultant at a London NHS hospital.
What he revealed was shocking.
Quote, I am horrified by what is happening at NHS hospitals across the UK right now.
And this is happening across the world where I'm talking about the UK. It's just the UK example.
This is global. All patients over 60 automatically get a DNR without them or their family members being consulted.
I've seen the forms in their files with my own eyes.
Wait for this when I'm talking about fascism and Nazi Germany going global.
And this cult that's behind this was behind the Nazis.
It's the way they do things.
It's not just the over 60s that get them.
I've seen them being put in place for young people with mental health issues, for physically disabled people of all ages, and for autistic people.
We have had a schizophrenic woman in her early 30s admitted recently, and I found a signed DNR form in her file.
She hadn't been asked whether she wanted one or not.
This is the eugenics of Nazi Germany.
And you and the medical professional are not speaking out about it, are complicit with it.
But surely, Jackie DeVoy asks, but surely it's illegal to do this.
Wait for this. The consultant says not.
Quote, Since the coronavirus bill was passed in March, we have had all pretty much all our human rights taken away.
That includes medical rights.
There is no longer any body autonomy.
Your body and your life is not your own.
Once a person is admitted to hospital, they are the property of the hospital.
A doctor can now override the wants and wishes of a patient and their family.
I've seen notes stating that the patient and family does not want a DNR, and the notes are scored out with the words overridden by doctor across them.
And you doctors who are doing this are killing old people and you must go to jail for it.
The article goes on the consultant who has worked as a cardiologist for over three decades.
Says he is so upset by what's happening that he's decided to take early retirement.
I'm not here to allow patients to die unnecessarily.
Every person should have a chance of life, a second chance even.
I've seen many people resuscitated after heart attacks who've gone on to live another 10, 20 or 30 years.
The only reason for these DNRs, and I hate to admit this, he said, is to get rid of what Henry Kissinger once referred to as useless eaters.
People who are seen to be a drain on the world's resources.
In simple terms, it's a cull of society's most vulnerable people.
In a single word, it is eugenics.
People used to laugh and think the whole idea of depopulation was the stuff of conspiracy theories, he said.
But it's happening right now behind the closed doors of our near-empty hospitals.
That's from an NHS consultant, not a conspiracy theorist.
People are living in a dream world who don't realise that we're facing fascism, unfolding in more extreme terms every day.
And this is the eugenics of fascism and everyone involved in it must be brought to account.
It's so...
Eugenics is such a word that kind of evokes, like, what from people?
Because they think of Nazi Germany and they think of, you know, Dr Mengler and all this sort of stuff.
Like, that was something that just went on then in worse times.
And they don't understand that that's exactly what's happening.
And that the man who's driving all this bullshit all over the world, his dad was a eugenicist.
Absolutely. Absolutely.
Family's been into this stuff all along.
I shared a tweet on my Twitter, obviously, yesterday, where Bill Gates is being interviewed and he's saying that we need to have a look at the fact that what it costs to keep someone alive for another three months could mean a teacher not getting a job because of the financial situation.
So we kind of need to look at what's the point.
And you're like, fuck!
But you've got money for bombs everywhere.
Well, how much money has Gates got?
I mean, you know, hand a bit of that over, pay for a bloody teacher that's not there to program the population, the young population, which is what Gates is doing in America by funding this Common Core education system.
And by the way, talking of connections and dots connected, I've been pointing out since the 1990s, That the Rockefeller family, the same Rockefeller family that created the World Health Organization, now owned by Gates, a big Rockefeller family insider, the Rockefeller family funded a whole floor of a university in Germany for Ernst Rudin, Adolf Hitler's race purity expert.
And the Rockefellers sent their eugenics experts to Nazi Germany, To help to develop the Nazi eugenics program.
This is the people we're dealing with.
And they're now, well, now running.
They created the World Health Organization that's now driving global health policy.
And all they've done is they've looked at the way the Nazi Germany did it and gone, that's a little bit too obvious, that.
So let's just go, you know, under the radar, behind the scenes, re-badge it as something positive, like the World Health Organization.
Oh, you know, what's wrong with that?
They want World Health, you know, that's great.
But they just re-badge it and the whole thing's going on exactly the same as it was there.
It's so obvious when you see it.
And it staggers me that people can't.
Well, I have talked about mind blindness and the way that people's minds are convinced that they're coming to their own conclusions about things, this being an example.
When you hear them, all they're doing is repeating the official story of everything and calling it their opinion.
And on this subject of what we were talking about, The way that deaths are designated.
And the care homes come into this, as we know from people in care homes, nurses who've contacted us, that they are diagnosing whole care homes with COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2. And when they do that, Doctors' visits stop.
And antibiotics for other diseases stop.
Everything stops. Hospital visits stop.
And they die.
And this is massively where so many of the so-called COVID deaths in the figures have come from.
And this is a study, research from Loughborough and Sheffield Universities, which is...
Looking at another way of recording COVID deaths, and it says this, a new study by academics at the School of Business and Economics and the University of Sheffield and economic consultants from Economic Insights seeks to provide a statistically more robust approach to the question, how many deaths in England and Wales are due to COVID-19?
Well, I can answer that.
Frickin' zero.
This is what they say in their report.
Actual deaths due to COVID are some 54 or 63% lower than implied by the standard excess deaths measure.
And reported excess deaths likely include a significant number of non-COVID deaths.
Yeah, all of them.
And, you know, they say actual deaths are some 54 or 63% lower.
But those they're saying are COVID deaths are COVID deaths because they've been tested positive for COVID-19 in a test not testing for COVID-19 and then died.
So the number is zero.
How can you die of something that doesn't exist?
They also say, while it is well known that COVID deaths are concentrated in the elderly, the study finds them to be particularly acute in the very elderly, 75 to 84 and 85 years plus.
Why? Because the older you get, the more things you have to die from, and therefore the more potential there is to designate what you died from, COVID-19.
And it says, over the lockdown period as a whole, government policy has increased mortality, exactly what we're talking about, rather than reduced it, because of the impact of lockdown and the, in effect, closure of the hospitals to anything but COVID-19.
And it says here, this final finding may be alarming to some.
Oh, just a little bit.
But the authors point out that the lockdown initiative was always intended to, quote, flatten the curve.
Anyone remember that? You must have a good memory.
In other words, delaying the spread to avoid overburdening the NHS. And it was not necessarily done to lower mortality rates.
They also assert that the overall increase in mortality is a result of significant unintended consequences.
Unintended? Are you having a laugh?
Of the lockdown. For example, reduced A&E attendances and reduced cancer and cardiac treatments.
And one other point, or two other points, Gaz, that I'll make today is, let's not forget that, well AstraZeneca is one of them, but they're all going to get it, is to be exempt From the side effects of this Gates COVID vaccine.
And AstraZeneca, but like I say, they'll all get it, has been granted protection from future product liability claims related to its COVID-19 vaccine.
By most of the countries with which it has struck supply agreements, a senior executive told Reuters, with 25 companies testing their vaccine, candidates on humans, and getting ready to immunize hundreds of millions of people once their products are shown to work, well, that'll be a long bloody wait.
The question of who pays for any claims for damages in case of side effects has been a tricky point in supply negotiations.
Yeah, it's so tricky.
It goes like this. You give us immunity or you ain't getting the vaccine because we know the potential implications of the vaccine.
And the rude dobber A member of Astra's senior executive team told Reuters, this is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in four years the vaccine is showing side effects.
And so they want the taxpayer to pay against a very high bar of proving cause and effect.
For any health effects of this COVID vaccine, which they're telling is perfectly safe.
And anti-vaxxers who say, well, vaccines are not safe when billions are paid out for the consequences of vaccines.
Well, they're all mad and must be shut up, which is something that Johnson has indicated very, very recently.
And one other point before I come back to you, Gaz.
What you're going to see is this being moved across more and more towards the young and the consequences for them because they're going to try to sell this danger across the entirety of the population that run up to this vaccine you watch.
So here's a story this week.
COVID-19 symptoms may last beyond two weeks in young patients.
Survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the CDC, which is a cult-owned subsidiary, in effect, in America of the World Health Organization, found that even mild symptoms may lead to long-term complications.
They're talking about the young, and they say that they recommend that young people continue practicing social distancing, mask wearing, and other health measures, etc., etc.
But you're going to see them Trying to emphasize and sell the dangers of this fake virus to young people as the weeks and months follow from here.
I saw an article today actually adding a symptom that your hair falling out.
That's a symptom of COVID now, apparently.
So, right said Fred have fucked, obviously.
Another thing as well about this whole thing about going back to normal.
We'll get back to normal. You just wear a mask.
Mate, just wear a mask.
Was an article we shared today on davidart.com where the lady, I think she's the health minister, or their version of the health minister in Canada, gave a speech in their parliament in Ottawa.
She's connected to Bill Gates and World Health Organization, OBS. The Canadians should accept that basically you're going to have to wear a mask and social distance for two or three years.
Cheers. What she means, and those that control her mean, is...
Forever, indefinitely.
That's what they want. And a totally subjugated population.
And we've said many times the health consequences of long-term mask wearing are obviously respiratory and that will be called COVID-19.
And they'll put them on the figures as another case.
What's happening is that people are being...
I mean, flatten the curve was a classic.
Oh, only two or three weeks to flatten the curve.
That was to get the lockdown in.
But once the lockdown was in, it was never going to come out, as I said in the first London Real interviews.
They'll start...
Rolling it back a little, as little as they can get away with, and then they'll roll it forward again once we get into the winter.
And so when they introduce these next stages, say social distancing and then masks, they're not introduced to be rolled back.
And as well as.
So what they're trying to sell you, or we go back to normal and we can have football crowds and we can have events and concerts, etc.
That's to get you tested.
They don't mean that.
And they say, oh no, how many times have they said this?
If you want to go back to normal, you've got to have the vaccine.
But that's only for that stage of the script and the behavior manipulation.
And now we're seeing the next stage, which is what this lady is talking about, which is, yes, you need the vaccine.
But even if you have the vaccine now, you've got to still wear masks and social distance.
So what they're doing is building the layers of this fascistic Nazi global state.
And when they've got one in place, They may add another, like the vaccine, but that doesn't go away because this has come in.
It's an as well as. And they're building and layering it, and all the time it's becoming more and more Nazi.
And, well, I say more Nazi.
How Nazi can you get than what we've just described in the care homes and the culling of old people?
I said that to someone on social media yesterday.
Basically, this isn't meant to go away.
You know, I shared that story on my own social media with a lady in Canada.
And someone said, you know, no, people won't have it.
They won't have it. It's like, mate, I said that in March.
If they extend the lockdown, people would stand up and they wouldn't have it.
People don't have bollocks, metaphorically.
They don't have the bollocks at the moment and it's infuriating.
And like you keep mentioning, they need to grow a pair quick because this isn't going anywhere.
And, you know, I see a lot of people say, well, yeah, you know, I'll just wear a mask and then, you know, and then we'll go back to normal.
No, that's never planned.
It's never planned. What we are, Gaz, with the point you've raised, is where we were earlier in this chat, which is people are looking for ways to avoid looking this in the eye and growing a pair.
They want to find an excuse not to do so.
So they will react the way you're describing, not because deep down they don't know we're in real fricking trouble here in terms of human freedom, but because they don't want to do anything about it.
And I've said from the start of this, and I've said endless times, and we'll go on saying it, every time you accept the next imposition and acquiesce to it, are worse ones coming around the fricking corner.
▲
Export Selection