The video clips of liberal attacks on democracy, after the Supreme Court’s Roe ruling, are a must-see. In this episode, I address the dangerous path we’re on, and how to correct it.
News Picks:
Merrick Garland's DOJ Is A Threat To The Republic.
Troubling calls for Clarence Thomas’ assassination spread across social media after Roe reversed.
Adam Schiff says he has “evidence” again.
Gina Carano speaks out about attempts to cancel her.
Are You Telling People To Break The Law?’: MSNBC Host Presses CA Lt. Gov. On Calls To ‘Defy’ SCOTUS.
New York Times complains that Big Tech may censor less "election misinformation" during the 2022 midterms.
Copyright Bongino Inc All Rights Reserved
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
First, let me say my sincere apologies about Friday.
News breaks on Friday about Roe being overturned by the Supreme Court and the Dobbs decision.
We had already pre-scheduled a day off for a very important event.
We had to go to a friend's wedding.
I could not bail.
It would have been very bad for me to do that.
It would have been very Very rude.
So we posted on the podcast channel my opening for the radio show where we came in and Joe and Guy and Jim and them were super flexible and I appreciate all the hard work they did.
So my apologies for the kind of almost unpolished nature.
Of the double Friday podcast thing.
But, uh, I felt an obligation personally to you to be there on the biggest court decision for conservatives and the support of life in, in, in decades.
Um, so again, my apologies for kind of the unpolished nature of it, but he and Joe and them did their best.
I just had to put something out there for you.
I felt like you were entitled to my, uh, my opinion on that day, uh, or me being in there entitled to my opinion.
I'm probably wording that point, but you get the point.
Welcome to the Dan Bongino Show on this Monday.
I've got that.
I've got it.
Obviously, we're going to talk more about that now that I have time and a regular podcast.
We're back.
But be careful.
Keep your head on a swivel.
Keep your eyes open, ladies and gentlemen.
They want to now burn it all down.
I'm going to give you the bad news and then the good news, because there is some good news coming out of this.
They are about to go through an extinction burst.
If you're in the market for a rifle, shotgun, or revolver, you want to go with the best in the business.
And as far as I'm concerned, that's Henry Repeating Arms.
You'll be amazed by their quality craftsmanship and buttery smooth action that makes them a pleasure to shoot.
Mine were accurate right out of the box, and they've been reliable ever since.
The best way to learn about Henry Repeating Arms 200 models is to go to HenryUSA.com and order their free catalog.
The catalog is a great guide to showcasing their Made in America firearms, plus you'll get free decals, a list of dealers in your area, and a great newsletter.
Henry's are backed with a lifetime warranty for 100% satisfaction.
They're made in America or they won't be made at all.
And if you have questions, you can call the award-winning customer service department to speak with an expert who can help you.
Make sure you go to henryusa.com to order their free catalog and decals.
The best way to learn about Henry Repeating Arms 200 models is to go to henryusa.com and order their free catalog.
That's henryusa.com to order a free catalog and decals and to learn more about this great American company.
Let's go.
Damn coke machine!
What?
You okay?
Damn coke machine!
Yeah, I'm having an extinction outburst.
Oh, I knew it.
You're a coke machine.
Listen, I'm losing my hearing, man.
Things ain't working right.
Me too.
That right ear is like a cave.
It's like the freaking bad cave.
Stuff goes in, it never comes out.
So the extinction burst, yes, that's what's going to happen right now.
Joe is citing an example because he pays attention that I've used many times on the show of what an extinction burst is in psychology.
An extinction burst is you put a dollar in a Coke machine, wait for the can of Coke to come out, nothing comes out.
What do people do?
You've seen it, you know it.
You've seen it in movies, you've seen it in real life.
Joe's right.
You kick the machine.
Why do you kick and shake the machine, right?
The chances are it's probably not going to lead to an actual coke for your dollar, but it's an extinction burst.
You've put a dollar in a thousand times every day you've gotten a coke.
You've engaged in a behavior, dollar in machine, reward.
Coke comes out.
When you don't get the reward, it is human and animal behavior to go through this extinction burst of behavior where you start shaking and you start shaking and you're like losing your mind over it.
That is what's happening right now.
The left is, I didn't even think of that.
Let me write that down so I don't miss this on the radio show later.
I had a reputation for that at WCBM.
Yeah, well good.
You're good for it.
Joe probably hit a button at WCBM and something didn't record or play, and Joe'd shake violently the machine.
It's not you, Joe.
It's not like you're a bad guy.
Everybody does it.
The left is doing that now.
The left's extinction burst, however, is something different.
The left is engaged in activism, judicial activism, culture wars, cancelling people, in an effort to infiltrate the courts, to use the courts as a political branch for decades.
And damn it, the gavel swallowed.
It worked.
It worked.
They've used the courts to push through, through black robes, what they couldn't push through an election boost behind the ballot box.
And now all of a sudden it's turned, dipsy-doo-flipperoo, 180 in a different direction, and the left has no idea what to do.
So what's their response?
An extinction burst.
Now we're going to burn it all down.
We win.
And hat tip my longtime listener, Brian, who always sends me great emails.
Badger Brian.
He's like, listen, Dan, this is kind of, this is the end of this, the Obama doctrine.
The Obama doctrine he describes as this, and he's right, Joe.
The Democrats under the Obama doctrine.
We win, you can serve it as a lead in.
We lose, don't worry, we'll just burn it all down.
He's right, that's the Obama doctrine.
You're seeing the end of that now.
So that's kind of the good news to the bad news.
Let's get to some of the bad news in detail first.
We're degenerating into madness and chaos here because of the Obama doctrine.
Again, we win, eat it, conservatives.
We lose, burn that bird down.
I'm afraid short term, we're in for some dark times.
Long term, the sun is about to come up.
I am sure of it, sure of it.
Why?
Because the left doesn't have the guts, the will, or the knowledge to fight this long-term.
I saw it this weekend, and not to get off on it, Guy, if I go on too much, just shut me down.
I know he thinks I rant too much, so it's important.
You are the producer here.
But I was up in New York this weekend doing my Fox show live, and I just spoke to Guy this weekend.
He just came in this morning, seen him for the first time.
He usually does my show, but I was up in the Fox studio this weekend.
And Guy's like, man, I'm surprised it wasn't crazier this weekend.
You know what?
I was up in New York.
The liberal capital of the world.
I gotta tell you, I was surprised too.
Friday night was a little bit ugly.
They came to the Fox News studio, spray-painted on it, because they're maniacs.
But Saturday night, Joe?
Nothing.
Not a peep.
Couple screamers in the street, that was it.
Yeah.
I'm stunned.
And I think it's because they don't have the guts or the will to fight this thing long-term.
Let's get to the bad news first, how they want to burn it all down.
Here's Elizabeth Warren, who has just gone insane.
I mean, decades ago, she portrayed herself as kind of a moderate voice, you know, even pretending to back some Republican causes.
She's now gone nuts.
Now, this is not a genuine transformation.
I want you to understand Elizabeth Warren, Pocahontas here, who pretended to be an Indian for a long time, is doing this because she thinks there's an electoral path to power by becoming a lunatic.
Here's Elizabeth Warren speaking.
Again, they're not hiding it.
I bring the receipts on this show every time.
Here's Elizabeth Warren coming out and just saying the quiet part out loud.
Yeah, Supreme Court didn't go our way.
It didn't invent the right to abortion in the Constitution, which isn't there.
So let's just burn it all down.
It's kind of illegitimate.
Check this out.
This court has lost legitimacy.
They have burned whatever legitimacy they may still have had after their gun decision, after their voting decision, after their union decision.
They just took the last of it and set a torch to it with the Roe vs. Wade opinion.
He said it right, Joe.
Sounds like she wants an insurrection there.
It sure does.
I mean, really?
Is that right?
It sounds like this will be their umpteenth insurrection.
We had the Chop Zone, the Oregon courthouse.
We had the Antifa BLM riots all over the country.
We had Arizona this past week where they attacked the statehouse in Arizona after the abortion ruling.
Sounds like they're, yeah, they're umpteenth.
I'm losing track of time here.
Umpteenth insurrection.
They're just saying it right now out loud.
They're not hiding it.
They're not being, you know, cryptic about it.
They're just coming out with it now.
Court didn't go our way?
Didn't fabricate a right to abortion in a constitution that ironically doesn't even mention the word abortion or imply it?
Let's just burn it all down, baby!
Here, it gets worse.
Here is the Lieutenant Governor of California, Elena Koulanakis.
She's asked directly, are you suggesting people defy the law?
She's like, no, but maybe they should.
And she goes out to apply, they should, right afterwards.
Here, this is an MSNBC interview.
Check this out.
Be prepared to live in defiance of these six people who think that they have the right to tell you what you can do.
Are you telling people to break the law?
No.
I am telling people that they can access, under California law, their rights that were protected by the Constitution.
That is going to be held in defiance in some states.
And I would say, yes, prepare to defy.
Prepare to defy, folks.
She claims again, falsely.
falsely that this right is in the Constitution.
It is not.
Guys, ladies, listen, you can read the Constitution yourself.
There's an app for it.
You can get a printed copy of the Constitution.
It's not hard.
You can go online and put US Constitution.
You can read this.
It's not there.
The Supreme Court has just ruled it's not there.
It's never been there.
That row was poorly decided based on a small R right that never existed ever.
And you have the Lieutenant Governor of California still insisting that you have this right you don't have
and that, yeah, you know what, go ahead and defy it.
[BLANK_AUDIO]
You don't win, you burn it all down.
Folks, keep in mind, conservatives don't do this same thing.
Real conservatives.
We were stuck with the unquestionably unconstitutional Obamacare disaster, and we did our best to try and get rid of it.
We're still not there.
But nobody suggested we should burn the government down in the process and disband or pack the Supreme Court.
Because we're not leftists, and I'm proud of that, and you should be too.
Now the media, which we obviously know is not objective.
Journalism is dead.
The biggest insult on planet earth is don't ever, ever, ever call me a journalist.
Call me whatever you want.
Start with a B, a C, a D. That's okay.
It can have four letters.
Don't call me a journalist, please.
That's the one thing.
Don't even go there.
Here's a headline from USA Today.
Courts legitimacy in question after ruling.
Now, if this was a properly worded headline, John Fritz, by the way, who I knew in the Baltimore Sun when I read in Maryland, used to be a pretty decent journalist.
John, listen, I'm not, you know, he's a nice enough guy.
I don't want to make it personal about him.
But John, this isn't a real headline.
The court's legitimate.
Joe, tell me, you don't remember Fritz, right, from the Baltimore Sun?
He was like a big shot at the Baltimore Sun before he went to USA today.
Barely.
Yeah, barely remember him.
He was honest a little bit about Joe.
You know what a normal guy would say?
Yeah, yeah, I remember him.
Joe's like, nah, nah, I don't remember him that much.
But Fritz, here's the real headline here, and you know, Joe, the headline should have read, Democrats question court legitimacy.
The court's legitimacy is not in question.
It is a political attack on the courts.
Right.
That is not true.
He's already making an assertion about what is an open question by Democrats, not Republicans.
The court's legitimacy is not in question.
Putting it on the front cover, which this was on the front cover, right?
I sent you that picture, right?
On the front cover of USA Today, it implies that this is a legitimate question in and of itself.
It is not.
Now, the Washington Post too.
It's just come out and saying the obvious right now.
We lose, we're going to burn this whole to the ground.
Greg Sargent and Paul Waldman, two total goons, right?
In the Washington Post.
The Supreme Court is the new forever war.
This is hilarious.
Again, this is not journalism.
This is activism.
The Supreme Court is the forever war because of the left, not because of the right.
I have said repeatedly, I don't want conservatives and I don't want liberals on the court.
I want judges who are going to read and interpret the Constitution and the law as it abides by the Constitution.
It's the left that wants activists.
They started this with the Bork hearings, the confirmation hearings for Robert Bork.
They're the ones who destroyed the Supreme Court.
Now, the Washington Post wants you to believe it's a dipsy-do-flipper-oo and the other way around.
The one thing I appreciate about this article in the Washington Post, I'll put the screenshot up here in a second.
Is that the left, they have to, pardon my language, but they have to show their ass all the time.
When the left gets angry, they always drop their pants like, hey, look at this blue moon from Greece, right?
I've seen in Greece show, they come walking across the floor.
The younger kids are like, what's that?
What are you talking about?
What are the funniest scenes I've ever seen, right?
This is the left.
They have to show their rumps all the time.
They can't control themselves.
So leave it to Greg Sergeant Waldman at The Post to show you what their next steps are.
First, court backing.
Second, it's going to be Puerto Rico and D.C.
statehood.
And then it's going to be wars in the states and in these different positions.
So on the different pro-life legislation that's going to come out.
But they say this, Washington Post, quote, and it means Democrats must stand for serious structural reform of the court.
Notice I said structural reform, Bella, structural reform as a corrective to the irredeemable Republican tainting of it.
That's a good one.
This might entail term limits for justices, or expanding the court, or constraining its power with legislative reforms like limiting its jurisdiction, requiring supermajorities to overturn legislation, and enabling legislative overrides of rulings.
But whatever the specifics, the core principle has to be that the court simply cannot continue to exist in its current form if we're to call ourselves a liberal democracy.
No, it can!
No, it can, Greg.
Greg Paul, it can and it will.
Now, as Joe said opening up the show, you can continue to kick the Coke machine all you want, screaming and yelling, clawing at your face, wetting your diapers, foaming at the mouth.
You can do whatever you want.
But you packed the court.
Let me tell you something, ladies and gentlemen, it's game on.
Because if you decide you want to pack the court because you don't like the rulings, I can promise you, I am going to push and use every single microphone and video camera I have to suggest to Republicans that for every justice the liberals add, we should add three.
I don't care if the court is 7,000 members.
You want to burn this thing down?
Then we're going to feed you your medicine.
You don't like syrup of epicac?
Suck on this one.
Drink the whole bottle.
I promise you.
Listen to me now.
Me and a number of other conservative radio hosts I know, not all, but a number of conservative radio hosts I know, will use every single channel and it's substantial.
The combined effort of all of us reach tens of millions of people.
If you want to pack the court, I'm telling you, I will demand, I will not support anyone who doesn't support adding two or three justices for every liberal justice you add to the court.
You want to pack it to 12?
I want to see 21.
You want to pack it to 25?
I want to see 40.
You like apples?
How do you like them apples?
You want to F around and find out?
You'll find out.
Believe me.
Do not underestimate.
Trust me on this one.
Do not underestimate the power of conservative media.
It's not just me.
By myself, it's limited.
Myself with our partners in the business.
You learned that lesson the hard way in 2016.
You'll learn it again.
Now of course they have more crazy ahead.
It's not just court packing.
They want to make D.C.
a state.
D.C.
is not a state.
It's the capital.
They want to make Puerto Rico a state.
Puerto Rico is not a state.
They've shown no interest in being a state.
In polling.
Gets even worse.
We're talking about assassinating Clarence Thomas as well.
Some people on the left.
Now, to be clear, this isn't a mainstream Democrat position.
I don't do what journalists do and lie about conservatives.
But folks, this is not a limited thing on social media either.
There are a number of lunatics on social media calling for the assassination of Clarence Thomas and other judges as well to get liberals appointed.
You're seeing them calling right now for the dumping and scrapping of the filibuster.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to tell you again.
You want that syrup of Ipecac?
New rules, Joe.
You want to dump the filibuster?
Fine.
Is it a dumb idea?
It is.
If you do it again, I will not support candidates then, after that, that don't use the dumped filibuster to then push things we've wanted for years, Joe.
Entitlement reform.
Yeah.
Balanced budget rules.
Tax cuts.
National pro-life legislation protecting life because life and the protection of life is in our founding documents.
Guarantees of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Can't guarantee life if you're killing people, can you?
So just to be clear to our leftist friends, and I use that term friends loosely, you want to do the extinction burst?
You want to lose your grapefruits?
You want to crap your diapers?
You go right ahead.
You push for court packing and the filibuster.
I'm going to use every single channel and every friend I have to make sure that we make you pay.
And we take your suggestions, your suggestions, and we use them against you to advance liberty and freedom.
You learned that lesson the hard way.
It was Harry Reid pushing to dump the filibuster for court appointments that led to this path we're on now with the transformation of the court back to the Constitutional Republic and an allegiance to constitutionalism.
You want to do it again?
You can thank Harry Reid.
You can thank Harry Reid for this.
And all these nuts like Elizabeth Warren and others pushing for court packing and the filibuster, you go right ahead.
You nominate one, we'll nominate three.
You want to use the filibuster?
We'll use the filibuster and we're in charge too, the lack of it.
And you'll see a conservative republic you haven't seen in decades.
Careful what you ask for.
You just might get it.
So that's step one of their plan.
Go crazy, push for core packing.
So I want to get to step two and three in a minute, too.
If you're looking for a firearm, I wholeheartedly recommend Henry Repeating Arms.
They make 200 models of rifles, shotguns, and revolvers in a wide variety of calibers and finishes.
Plus, they have new releases throughout the year.
And trust me, folks, you just can't beat their quality.
The best way to learn about Henry Firearms is to order their free catalog to check out their line at home.
Plus, you'll get two free decals, a list of dealers in your area, and a great newsletter.
Just go to HenryUSA.com and click on the free catalog button in the top right corner.
Henry Repeating Arms uses old-world craftsmanship combined with cutting-edge technology to deliver reliability and accuracy you can trust.
They're easy to use and maintain, making them an excellent choice for personal and property defense, hunting and the shooting sports, and beginners.
And they're made in America, or they won't be made at all.
Remember to order their free catalog and decals at HenryUSA.com.
Just go to henryusa.com and click on the free catalog button in the top right corner.
That's henryusa.com and click on the free catalog button in the top right corner.
You're going to love this company.
Okay.
So I talked about step one of the liberals new burn it all down plan, burn it all down, burn it to the ground.
I said, new rules.
They want to burn it to the ground.
Okay.
We'll build it back after you burn it, but it ain't going to be pretty.
Ain't going to be what you want.
Burn it all down, step one.
Court packing, filibuster.
Step two!
Use the most corrupt individual to ever serve as the Attorney General of the United States, a gyno, Attorney General and name only, Merrick Garland, a disgustocrat, a disgusting corruptocrat, that's a combination of the two, to weaponize the DOJ and use them as shock troops in your new war, to burn it to the ground!
What better person than Merrick Garland?
Garland candidly feels like he was snubbed for his Supreme Court shot.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, the left can whine and moan all they want that when Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for Scalia's spot, they could moan all they want that he was illicitly kept off the court or whatever.
That is just factually inaccurate.
That's factually inaccurate.
The president of the United States, if you read the constitution, again, folks, there's an app for that on the left is an app.
You can read it.
There's hard copies.
You can go online.
If you actually read the constitution where you won't find the word abortion, ironically anywhere, right?
Although you keep claiming it's there, you won't find it anywhere.
Also in there, you will find out that the president nominates.
A candidate for the Supreme Court, an open seat.
It is the Senate that confirms.
Is any of this hard?
Is this complicated?
It's like Ethics 101, Constitution 101, right?
Basic, yeah.
Well, yeah, basic, right?
Pretty basic.
Mitch McConnell led a Republican-led Senate.
That Republican-led Senate said, no, we will not confirm.
You may not like that.
That's happened to Republicans, too.
Bork was nominated by Reagan.
He did not get confirmed.
It was really disgusting what the left did to him, but it wasn't extra-constitutional, unconstitutional, super-constitutional.
It was constitutional!
You don't have to like it, but it is!
My point is, Garland's bitter.
Garland's been corrupted.
Garland is morally corrupted now.
There's no doubt about it.
And the left is still whining because they hate the Constitution.
He's not on the courts.
So they're going to use him to weaponize.
This is a great piece.
John Daniel Davidson.
It's in my newsletter today.
Bongino.com slash newsletter.
Sorry, a lot of energy today.
I feel like even though Friday we did that impromptu show on the radio, I'm like, got a lot to talk about.
This article in the Federalist is worth your time.
Bongino.com slash newsletter.
Subscribe today.
It's free.
I want you to read this, please.
It talks about how Merrick Garland's Department of Justice is a threat to the Republic.
Amen, Brother John Daniel Davidson.
Three names there.
John Daniel Davidson.
I don't know this guy, but I like him already.
This is a great piece.
He goes through, step by step, the most destructive force in the history of the Attorney General's office.
Merrick Garland.
Disgustocrat.
And all of the stuff he has done to destroy, step two, burn it all down and destroy the rule of law.
He goes through all of it.
Not enforcing the law with the illegal protests at the justices' homes.
The Second Amendment decision by the Supreme Court.
Garland's DOJ, Joe, releases a press release saying they disagree with the decision.
Ladies and gentlemen, that's not a small thing.
No.
You have the Department of Justice being told by a separate but equal branch of government An equal, co-equal branch of government.
This is how the Constitution should be interpreted.
And then you have the enforcement arm, which is supposed to enforce that, from the DOJ, telling people they disagree.
This is a huge thing.
We're now giving opinions from the Department of Justice.
It goes on, the piece.
Jeffrey Clark, a lawyer in the Department of Justice.
During the 2020 election dispute stuff, who was involved with the Trump administration.
They raided his house.
They raided a GOP official, Mike McDonald, out of Nevada, simply for signing on to an elector's slate.
He perfectly has a right to his opinion.
You had the raid on James O'Keefe, Project Veritas.
We'll get to him later, too.
The spying on O'Keefe.
The school board targeting of parents as domestic terrorists.
The failure of Garland to secure our border, it's disgusting.
So step one, destroy it.
Court packing.
D.C.
statehood, assassinate Thomas, dump the filibuster.
Step two, use Garland to make sure you have DOJ shock troops on the ground.
Shock troops that will then force the political mandates of the Biden administration by arresting Trump lieutenants, or people they perceive as Trump lieutenants, and Republicans, and then ignore actual law-breaking for people who are trying to intimidate, in some cases assassinate, Supreme Court justices.
Bold plan.
Disgusting.
But they're not hiding it anymore.
Finally, most importantly, step three.
Oh, I should say most importantly.
These are co-equal levels of importance.
Use the media and the culture to isolate conservatives.
Here's what I mean.
The media meltdown overrode.
Keep in mind, some of these people are opinion folks.
Some of them are attempting to be journalists or said they're journalists, which is kind of a joke.
We get that.
I said that before.
No need to relitigate that.
Here's the media meltdown, and Chuck Todd's in there too.
I know with the medals, it's a lot of work to redo the whole thing.
The pictures, we've got to frame them and everything.
Chuck Todd's working his way back in, man.
Scarborough trained hard, so I don't just want to casually and flippantly take away his bronze, but Chuck Todd's right.
He's in this hit too.
He pretends to be a journalist.
Here are them losing their minds over a right to abortion in the Constitution that never, I repeat, never ever existed.
They made it up.
Check this out.
Stand by, Jeffrey.
We do have breaking news just in to CNN.
Give me just a moment of personal care.
Sorry, I'm getting, you know, watching the women there.
It's emotional.
This is as devastating a ruling as can be imagined.
It's a very dark day in America.
You cannot overstate this.
I'm not sure we all fully appreciated how devastating it would feel to see the words on the paper condemning women to second-class citizenship.
I think there's a lot of folks who feel as if Gorsuch and Barrett, two of the five on this opinion, We're sort of there unfairly, or sort of out of bounds.
This is a court not of judges, but of politicians in judges' robes.
That is the danger that Justice Stephen Breyer is alerting the country to.
There are no more black robes.
I think the robes are red and blue.
I don't think the country benefits from a future that involves a highly politicized Supreme Court.
There really is a lot of people who believe this is a rigged court.
I mean, folks, this is not journalism, okay?
I hope you understand that.
This is activism.
Rigged court.
Chuck Todd saying they're not black robes, they're red and blue.
I mean, this is not journalism.
This is full-blown activism.
And the purpose of it, step three of the liberal plan to burn it all down, is to use the media to isolate conservatives and make you feel, now that you've been vindicated, there is no right to abortion in the Constitution.
Fact.
Period.
It's not there.
You will never, ever produce it.
You can spin your wheels, you can lie, scream, wet your diapy, foam at the mouth, cry, scream, yell, yell at the sky, attack people, do whatever you want.
It is not going to appear.
It is the fetch of the Constitution.
You can't make fetch happen.
You are not going to make abortion appear in the Constitution.
It isn't even implied.
Chuck Todd can melt down all he wants.
It's not there.
And it's never been there.
So they have to use the media of the left while they're trying to court-pack and use Garland to attack their political enemies, to burn this place to the ground, to isolate conservatives and make you feel morally better about this effort.
Oh, look at those outliers.
You're horrible Christians.
I'll get to that later too.
The war on Christianity.
They use the media to make you feel isolated.
Listen to me.
You are not alone.
You are not alone.
There are hundreds of millions of people who feel the same way you do.
That life should be protected at all stages.
You are not alone.
You are not a fringe.
You are not the enemy.
You are not the bad guy.
Don't let these media hacks, who are nothing more than activists, try to convince you otherwise.
I got more video coming up here in a second, Chuck Scarborough, with the, you know, just this so ridiculous take by the left.
Words are violence, Joe.
Words are violence, according to Scarborough.
But violence isn't violence, which is kind of strange.
Seems like an inversion, doesn't it?
Coming up in a minute, I'll get to that.
And a Wall Street Journal article you should be really, really concerned about.
Remember, I said step three is use the media and the culture to isolate conservatives.
I haven't even gotten to the culture part yet.
Something very, very bad happened with regards to your firearm rights to protect yourself this weekend, this past week.
Stay close.
It's not a hyperbolic tease, by the way.
Getting back to it, step three.
Use media and the culture to isolate conservatives.
Here is Joe Scarborough.
It's a good point, Guy.
I think we got a little bit out of our league.
Todd's bad, but Scarborough trained really hard, so he deserves it.
And he's still training right now.
He's still competing at a high level.
Here's Joe Scarborough claiming that...
I don't think he's actually, by the way, read the Dobbs decision on the Roe v. Wade case and the Dobbs case.
I'm convinced he hasn't read it, because if he's read it, he would realize how ridiculous it sounds.
But he says, Joe, it's worded so aggressively, it's almost like violence.
Forget the fact that the lefties were the violent ones.
There was an insurrection in Arizona, you may have missed, where they tried to take over the statehouse like the Roe v. Wade.
It's the words that did it here.
Check this out.
More than any Supreme Court decision I've ever read.
It was, even the language, there was a violence to the reasoning.
We win, you lose, we're taking away these rights, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Please, if somebody disagrees with me, please let me know where a court has overruled a right that's been in place for 50 years and done so in such an aggressive manner.
Okay.
It's never been a right.
If you actually read Alito's words in the decision, he cheated and Scarborough, can I let you in on a dirty little secret?
I did a lot of work at MSNBC and CNN.
I didn't work for them.
I did a lot of contributed work, spent a lot of time around their studios, Capitol Hill and elsewhere.
CNN has one not too far away, New York.
They have studios in New York.
I've been around there a lot.
It's not just one or two times.
You see it.
Producers run out with a bunch of papers.
Joe, come on, you know, you've been in this business forever.
They highlight a few lines that people read.
You really believe Joe Scarborough read any of this, folks?
At no point in Alito's writing about the Roe case does it say, fellas, we win, you lose, kiss my ass.
He's a crazy person.
He goes through the entire thing, Alito, saying the exact opposite, how this was never based in the Constitution.
It won't ban abortion.
It'll turn it back to the states where it belongs.
It says nothing of the sort.
But notice how Scarborough, again, by implicitly kind of playing down the actual violence, pretending the words in Alito's opinion are violence.
It's so stupid.
He didn't read it.
It's so dumb.
Now, this is probably the most important story you did not hear.
Get ready for this one, please.
Everybody stop what you're doing.
I'm not being overly dramatic about this.
Please stop what you're doing and pay close attention to this story.
It is the most important story that happened last week that you did not hear about in many cases.
Some of you may have, if you read it in the journal.
The left step three, using the media and the culture to isolate conservatives.
The culture part, through cancel culture and constant pressure on companies to not do business with conservatives, is going to cause just as much damage as using the courts to enact their liberal fake rights in the constitution.
Here's what I mean.
This piece in the Wall Street Journal, it's not in the show notes because it's behind a paywall and I don't want to get a lot of complaints, but please go and read it.
It's called, You Won Your Gun Case, You're Fired.
It is a terrific piece by their editorial board.
It talks about this law firm, Kirkland and Ellis.
You know, there was a big second amendment decision.
We covered it extensively last week, which again, destroyed these may issue states that decided it's their right to may or may not issue a carry permit for people.
It was, that's, that's no longer going to be allowed now.
It was a huge win for your second amendment, right?
The lawyer who won this case, Paul Clement, Now, Joe, I mean, you and I have been in this business a while in the past, regardless of your, the political, I don't know, what do you want to call it?
Political tinge to the case?
No.
If you want a huge case in front of the Supreme Court, whether it was a liberal tinge or conservative tinge, this was a huge deal for the firm.
Oh, yeah.
Because they practice law and their lawyer won.
Nope.
Nope.
Oh yeah, no.
It's oh no now.
They're leaving!
The guy who won the case, Paul Clement, has been told basically beat it!
Here, quote from the journal piece.
Kirkland & Ellis, that's a law firm.
Kirkland & Ellis announced today its decision to no longer represent clients with respect to matters involving the interpretation of the Second Amendment.
We don't do that Constitution stuff.
Wait, you're lawyers.
No, no, no.
We're not lawyers for that.
We're only lawyers for liberal lawyer stuff.
The firm said in a press release without explanation, it added that Mr. Clement and Ms.
Murphy, who won the case, will be leaving the firm in order to continue their full range of existing representations.
Folks, on a very serious note, gravely serious note, I told you I'd give you the bad news first.
This is extremely dangerous.
It is unforgivable in this country that an Antifa fire bomber Who allegedly tried to kill cops with their firebombs.
Can have no problem whatsoever getting legal representation.
But people who simply want to defend their own lives with a firearm and get out of may issue status to shall issue status.
Arguing a legitimate second amendment legal constitutional right.
Cannot get a lawyer without the lawyer having to worry about being fired.
Folks, I've hesitated to put this story on the air in the past, because I've known about this for a long time, because I don't want to incentivize liberals to do more of it, but clearly it's gotten out of control.
Here's what I mean.
A point of personal privilege, if I may, fellas.
I'm involved in a number of different legal disputes.
The minute you get involved in business, it just happens.
I wish it didn't, but it does.
There's no way to avoid it.
People just, you know, get dollar signs in their eyes and they, You know, all want to sue and all that other stuff.
So I've been involved in a lot of that.
We've already had two lawyers say to us, two of them, uh, one kind of hinted and one just came out and told me that, yeah, we're, you know, we don't, we don't do business with like conservative types.
Trust me when I tell you this is not new.
This is really sad.
And let me just say and go on the record, because you're again, you're entitled to my opinion.
You owe me nothing.
I owe you everything.
You're going to spend time with me.
You deserve an opinion from me.
The worst serial murderers.
I'm think of the worst person possible.
I really the worst person.
I'm trying to a pedophile, racist, Uh, serial murderer, okay?
Like open racist, like Nazi stuff, pedophile, serial murderer, racist, domestic abuser, the worst person, no redeeming characteristics at all.
I'm gonna go on the record and tell you, which shouldn't be controversial, but sadly it is.
The person deserves legal representation.
Why?
Because I would rather let a thousand guilty people go than convict one innocent person.
Because that's not justice.
That worst person possible deserves the chance in court to say, hey, that person's not me.
You got the wrong guy.
I will always, always be a free speech, judicial, excuse me, legal representation, constitutional legal representation.
Always.
Absolutist.
Always.
No matter the political costs.
Those Antifa alleged firebombers?
They deserve representation too.
It is disgusting what the left will do, and I want you to say today, just chest out and chin up.
We are on the right side of this.
They are not.
There is a moral arc of history, make no mistake, and there is zero doubt in my mind that the left has chosen the wrong side.
That is the most disturbing story I saw last week.
I have been a victim of it, I have seen it, and a number of other conservatives, I'm sure, have experienced the same thing.
Now it's not just that pressuring and boycotting people to not serve conservative clients to make sure they don't have constitutionally protected legal representation in the constitution.
They also, of course, as we've spoken extensively about want to use censorship.
If you dare speak out about this, I've been a victim of that too.
It's fine.
Big boy, thick skin.
When it comes to that, I'm ready to deal with it.
We've got a lot of great companies that don't buy into that nonsense.
So it doesn't really matter.
Reclaim the Net.
The New York Times.
Hilarious.
The New York Times.
A media entity, again, that actually has constitutional protections, freedom of the press, in the Constitution, there's an app for that, is now pushing big tech to censor.
Reclaim the Net.
Tom Parker.
Another great piece in the newsletter.
Please read.
This one's in the newsletter.
New York Times complains that Big Tech may censor less election misinformation during the 2022 midterms.
This is freaking hilarious.
So the New York Times, who are full-blown leftist activists, who benefited extensively from the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop information before the 2020 election, suppression of information and censorship that flipped the results of the election according to polling, people would have voted differently otherwise, 16% of them wouldn't have voted for Biden if they would have known it, right?
They want that again!
In its article, the New York Times claims that this potential reduction in censorship and meta, that's Facebook, could have far-reaching consequences as faith in the U.S.
electoral system reaches a brittle point.
These are the same people who accused Donald Trump of being at a pee-pee tape and giving a hand-eat of Vladimir Putin before they won the election.
And they lament that dozens of political candidates running for election in 2022 believe that Trump was robbed of the 2020 election and are reaching American voters through social media platforms.
Why do I say and say often, please call me whatever you want.
I don't like it.
Four letter words.
I hate it.
Got into a beef with Portnoy from Barstool this past week about the abortion thing.
Call me whatever you want.
You know, I certainly paid back the favor to him and we won't be smoking a peace pipe over that anytime soon.
But don't call me a journalist.
Don't call me a journalist.
It's the most embarrassing, humiliating thing you can call someone these days.
The fact that I can come out on this show and tell you the most disgusting, filthy, criminally oriented leftist is entitled to vigorous legal protections in our court system.
And yet a constitutionally protected entity like the New York Times, literally in the constitution, freedom of the press, cannot come out for free speech and is actively pushing for more censorship and liberal disinformation.
It's just, it's certainly a new low.
For a paper that is used to new lows.
I mean, they defended the communists in the Soviet Union for a long time.
How do we fight back?
The good news coming up next.
Well, the Washington Post actually told us.
Let me get to my last sponsor and we can get to that.
When you're over the target, believe me, the Washington Post will let you know by their meltdowns.
Because just like the New York Times, they're not a real journalism entity.
It's a full-blown activism pact for the left.
How do we fight back?
Well, you can always leave it to the Washington Post to give you clues.
I've learned this, you know, Alan West told me this a while ago.
He had endorsed me during my congressional run and he did a fundraising event for us in Maryland.
It was a good event.
It was a packed house down there.
We were in Montgomery County, Joe.
Place was packed.
I mean, it was like not a, it was standing room only.
And, you know, he had this line, I forget what it was exactly, you know, he had, he was, he had a long legacy of military service.
He was saying, you know, when you're over the target, that's when the, you know, when the firing gets the hottest, you know, when you'll feel the rounds zipping by your head, that's how you know.
The Washington Post wrote a piece by Michael Scherer, which tells you how do we fight back and how are we winning?
I want to address three things.
Creating conservative constitutional enclaves, states and localities.
Second, continuing to transform the courts back to their original purpose, which is interpreting the law and getting out of politics.
That's step two.
Step three, we've got to flush the bureaucracy.
Anybody running for president in 2024 that doesn't pledge to get the partisanship out of our federal bureaucracies, don't even bother running.
You will never have my support.
I want it in a pledge.
I want it in writing.
How do I know this will work?
Because the left's whining about it now!
Here, this piece in the Washington Post.
Conservatives on the march.
GOP gains ground despite Democratic control.
What do they talk about?
The two things I've mentioned often and just mentioned now.
Creating state and local constitutional enclaves.
That abide by the law and don't get outside of the fence, right?
Outside of the constitutional fence of government power.
And the courts!
Here, the Washington Post fretting.
States and the courts.
Man, these conservatives are really kicking ass there.
Yes, chest out, chin up.
They note, quote, Washington Post, even if Democrats overperform expectation this fall, there's little expectation they can do much to expand their elected power.
Arizona and Georgia are the only states with Republican controlled legislature where the GOP is at serious risk of losing gubernatorial elections in November.
I dispute that, by the way, but we'll go on.
At the same time, Republicans have a path to winning control of governors' mansions and legislatures in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
They're fretting about the states.
I've been mentioning this, Joe, since Obama.
Remember when Obama was in and me and you were doing shows?
We were like, guys, we are kicking ass at the state level.
This is going to have long-term ramifications.
None of this is new.
You can go listen to my old episodes.
Second part, the courts.
They're fretting about the states, worried about the courts.
They note, quote, this will set up another presidential election in 2024, where the country's once again narrowly divided.
Even if Democrats win, they're likely to find themselves in a similar predicament with a conservative majority on the Supreme Court and Republican domination in many states.
Over the target.
Heavy artillery, folks, coming upwards.
Washington Post is basically telling you, here's the battle plan.
The battle plan for us is to double down.
Now it's to double down.
Now that we've been doing well at the state level, it's time to double down and not... I almost said a Kamala Harris there and said double down like three times in the same sentence.
It's time now to exert even more effort.
We've been winning at the state level.
Now it's time to take it to the city level and the local level too.
What do I mean?
That strategy has worked.
It's time to hit the school boards.
Get the school boards back to their mission of educating.
That's it.
Don't forget the state.
Don't forget the city level, the mayors and the governors, state legislators, state senate.
But it's time now for councilmen.
It's time now for school boards.
This is the way.
Folks, we're not losing everything.
Don't be apocalyptic.
Chest out, chin up.
The courts and the states, we are doing very well.
Now's the time to hit the gas, not the brake.
Now, speaking of the Kamala Harris repeating double down many times, the left will double down too on crazy.
I want to just say something quick before I get to my next segment here, where I show you some video of the left losing their minds this weekend and how it's my show your ass theory, how the new era of conservatives who figured out through the Tea Party, how to organize and push for change in the courts in the States and have won.
It's driving the left because they don't know how to respond to losing, to not respond tactically, but to respond by showing you their rump out of rage.
Like, look, I'm going to boot you.
This is going to get really ugly.
They've lost control.
I'll get to that in a second.
I just want to say this first.
To the Christians out there and people of faith in general, I don't want to eliminate other groups or limit it to Christians only.
Christians and people of faith, you will always be the enemy here.
The attacks on Christians and Jews and people of faith are going to continue.
And I want to make sure you're prepared for this fight ahead.
Nobody should lie to you about this.
The left's obsession with terminating human life in the womb, even with partial birth and late-term abortion, which the level of brutality is indescribable on this show, is not going to stop.
And there's a reason why they hate Christianity and people of faith.
I'm a Christian, I can speak to our faith.
I'm a sinner.
Let me say that again, I'm a sinner.
I try every day, I pray to the Father, Jesus Christ, every night, please make me a better person tomorrow than I was today.
But the difference between people of faith, specifically I speak for Christianity, being that I am a Christian, sinners are striving to be better.
We pray for absolution and forgiveness for our sins and try to be a better person the next day.
The people looking to exterminate human life in the womb.
They're sinners just like we are.
There's no difference in the sin.
The difference is we look for redemption and to be better people.
Those people on the left, they're sinners looking for permission for their sins.
They hate Christianity because it's a foil.
Here are people who are fallible like I am.
This is what the, the, the let's kill babies in the womb.
People say they're fallible like I am, but they're trying to be better.
I know what I'm doing is, is murder.
I know what I'm doing.
And I don't want to have a foil showing me how awful this really is.
It's the whole, you know, Oh, everybody's doing it approach.
You get what I'm saying?
They don't want that reflection on them.
Get used to it.
We're gonna be the bad guys.
But we're not the bad guys.
We're the good guys.
Here's what I mean by they're gonna double down on crazy.
So get used to these attacks.
They're coming hot and heavy, right?
Here's Stacey Abrams, and I noted this weekend on my social media account on Truth and Elsewhere, that outside of Pete Buttigieg, would you guys agree, tell me if you think I'm wrong, there isn't a bigger BS-er in politics than Stacey Abrams.
Buttigieg takes the cake, okay?
I would do a BS with Buttigieg, honorary mention Stacey Abrams segment, but we do too many stickers, right?
Buttigieg is the king of BS-ers, okay?
No doubt about that.
Stacey Abrams is a skill.
BSing people is a skill.
Buttigieg is good at it.
He's a liar, but he's good.
Abrams, I gotta tell you, is creeping on them.
I watched her on Fox News Sunday with Martha McCallum.
Here's a clip from it coming up just now.
She is unbelievable.
The skill at never answering a single question is incredible.
She's asked here a very simple question by Martha McCallum.
Do you support any limits on abortion?
Meaning, baby seconds from birth, fully, completely formed, ready for birth.
You kill it?
Now, of course, because Stacey Abrams knows what she's saying is disgusting and morally repugnant, she doesn't want to see herself.
So she just filibusters around it.
Here, check this out.
Do you support any limitation on abortion?
Or do you think that women should have the right to have an abortion all the way up to nine months?
I believe an abortion is a medical decision, and I believe that that should be a choice made between a doctor and a woman, and in consultation with her family.
It's a very, very, very simple answer.
It's a simple answer.
The answer is, yes, I support limits on abortion, and here they are.
Notice how she says she tries to pull it out of the political realm, which is really interesting because the same Democrats, Joe, are calling for a national abortion referendum and federal laws to put abortion into the political realm.
So it's not a political question, except it's a political question when we want it to be.
I told you they were going to double down.
I said to Lila Rose will be a guest on my radio show later, by the way, she was on my Fox show this weekend.
She's been an advocate for life for most of her adult life.
This is just the end of the beginning.
This is no time to pop the champagne.
They are going to double down on crazy and you are going to see partial birth abortion, nine month abortion.
That's not abortion.
This is called infanticide.
I want to get to this though before we go.
Project Veritas, uh, they just had a bombshell this weekend, a South Carolina lawmaker, apparently running for office, caught on a live phone line talking about One of the most racist things I've ever heard.
Talking about black people and dope money.
And taking dope money to stir up in the election.
Here, check this out.
We need some secret sleepers.
Like, we need them to run as the other side, even though they're for our side.
And we need them to win.
We need people to run as Republicans in these local elections.
This is the only way you're going to change the dynamics in South Carolina.
We can battle them in public all day, as long as we know we're working for the same goal.
For me, I feel like, y'all, we need sleepers.
Will we get enough of us in there?
We can have it for real from the inside out.
Then we can push some **** from the inside out.
We gotta take back some of these seats, especially in these local elections.
We need a group of sleepers.
I still gotta struggle to raise money for my campaign?
Where the **** is my black people with money?
I don't care about no dope money.
Give me that dope boy money.
We're the duffel bag boys.
Get your body with somebody in your family that don't even know you donating to my campaign and put that shit under their name.
Honestly, these ain't the same type of black people that I grew up around.
I don't recognize these black guys.
So, I don't understand black because I don't understand the type of black that they are.
Now, can I talk intelligently?
Can I?
I could be, listen, I can move in all kind of circles, but I'm a n***a. I love black people.
I feel safest around my people.
I'm very much a n***a in a lot of ways, but I know how to turn it off and turn it on.
I know how to be in certain spaces.
You gotta be able to turn it off and turn it on.
We need some folks that can wear all black at night and take their f***ing yard signs down when they sleeping.
Wow, that's right.
That has to be one of the most racist minute and 30 segments I've ever heard in my life.
Yep.
These aren't the black people.
I know what the black people, you know, I've don't money.
Um, do I even have to say testimonials are really weak and stupid, but you've never met a black person that don't money.
You want to visit my neighborhood?
We can, I can go knock on a few doors for you.
We can introduce you to, I mean, told you that we're going to double down on crazy.
This is the left.
This is who you're talking about here.
This is crazy.
Hey, one last thing I want to get to.
What did I always tell you about the danger of the stupid smart people, right?
Smart people who are degreed, use eloquent language, write these beautifully worded pieces, and yet they're the dumbest people on planet Earth.
Well, the king of the stupid smart people, at least in the pretend conservative movement, is without a doubt Kevin Williamson.
Kevin Williamson has a piece up in National Review that's so embarrassingly dumb, he refutes his own premise in the piece in an effort to kind of wreck the cons or whatever.
It's so embarrassingly dumb that I really like the other clip I just took out.
I consider cutting this out, even as I'm talking about it right now, because you'll probably be dumber after reading this.
So Donald Trump appointed these three Supreme Court justices, which Led to the most profound victory in the Supreme Court for the preservation of life, the most important issue in the conservative movement you had in 50 years.
So Kevin Williamson, who is a virulent anti-Trumper who pretends to be a conservative says, this is not Donald Trump's victory.
That's literally the headline.
He then goes to talk about rage monkeys of Twitter and talk radio, how we deride conservative Inc, Con Inc, which is a real thing.
And he talks about how Trump is really just a product of Paul Ryan's tax cuts, Club for Gross Deregulatory Agenda, how some National Review editors had given some economic policy advice, and he says, critically, Trump delegated his judicial selections to the Federalist Society because he really didn't have any choice as a matter of political reality.
You can't be a Republican presidential candidate without backing or saying you back an originalist approach to the federal judiciary.
This has got to be I kid you not, the single dumbest paragraph I have ever seen in an... I used to have a subscription to National Review, the hard copy.
I loved it.
It was such a great magazine.
Fantastic.
I don't know what's happened.
There are still some decent people over there.
I don't know what has happened, but this guy is a raging lunatic.
He is a smart guy.
Matter of fact, Joe, how many times have we mentioned this book?
The Socialist Guide to the Idiot's Guide to Socialism, whatever.
I forget the hell.
It's a great book.
He's very smart.
Trump.
But this is the show your ass theory.
The guy melted down after that.
He has lost his mind.
Conservatives and Twitter rage monkeys or whatever he's talking about.
The con-inc, the conservative inc people like Williamson we're mad at, it's not the con part that bothers us, conservative part, it's the inc part!
The fact that you write stupid pieces for clickbait, refuting your own premise!
So your premise is what?
Donald Trump was so shallow because he took advice from the people you respect and then enacted conservative policy?
Guys, can you please read that?
Does that not say that?
So, Kevin Williams' premise is, the smart people are Club for Growth, Paul Ryan, and the Federalist Society, and dopey Donald Trump took their advice to advance conservative causes that hadn't been advanced in decades.
Holy crikeys!
He actually wrote this in a piece!
This is the stupidest, smart person.
I've ironically sold more books for this guy than he's sold for himself.
Smart guy.
As dumb as the day is long, ever since Trump got elected.
These are the smart people.
Trump should've listened to him.
Trump listening to him makes him really dumb.
Okay?
King of the stupid smart people.
Right?
He's like, this is stage 22 TDS.
He didn't even say, he said stage eight.
Times that by three, baby.
24, stage 24 Trump TDS right here.
Kevin D. Williamson.
All right, good show today.
I really appreciate you tuning in.
We got Lila Rose on the radio show later.
Please subscribe to my podcast.
We had a little bit of a slow couple of weeks.
I always give you the good side and the bad side.
I need these subscriptions to stay on the top charts.
We're doing a big marketing campaign over the summer, but it keeps our costs down.
