Don’t Let the Democrats Get Away With This (Ep 1232)
In this episode, I address the disturbing reasons that the radical left wants to continue the destructive economic shutdowns. I also address Nancy Pelosi's troubling appearance on Fox News this weekend. Finally, I address explosive new information on the Spygate case.
News Picks:
The latest polls explain a lot about the politics of economic shutdowns.
Devin Nunes says GOP investigators are focused on information the CIA gave to the FBI in 2016.
The FBI withheld critical information about Christopher Steele.
Shocking numbers of people may have already contracted the Wuhan Virus.
Coronavirus is much more widespread than people thought.
Watchdog subpoenas Google for Hillary’s emails.
My appearance on Fox and Friends this morning.
Beware of the left’s dangerous “degrowth” movement.
The Australians finally come clean on Downer and Spygate.
Copyright Bongino Inc All Rights Reserved.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
Ladies and gentlemen, I, you know, I get it.
It's my show.
I have an interest in telling you to keep watching.
It's going to be a big show.
Whatever.
Trust me.
Today is going to be trust.
Place your trust in me on this one, please.
It's going to be an enormous show.
I'm going to lay out why the Democrats are so terrified Of the economy opening again and what they're really doing, important, but I also have some just killer connections on this Spygate thing.
It's all coming out now during this viral pandemic, weird, that are going to bake your bagels.
Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
Don't let others track what you do online.
Don't let it happen.
Keep yourself safe at expressvpn.com slash Bongino.
Welcome to the Dan Bongino Show.
Producer Joe, how are you today?
Fine sir.
Ah, Monday, Monday.
Glad to be back.
But, uh, Wait for the big show to happen here, you know?
I know, I tell Joe that and I don't let him know what's going on.
I don't know what the hell's going on.
Because I want to make sure he gets it too.
So let's get right to it.
Today's show brought to you by Buddy's Hat.
Policy genius.
There are things we look back on and think, how did I get it so wrong?
It might be wearing multiple polo shirts and popping all the collars, donating to Kony 2012, or dating that one person that one time.
You know the one.
We're always going to get things wrong.
That's just life.
But there are always things we can get right on the first try, like shopping for life insurance.
That's where Policy Genius comes in.
Policy Genius makes finding the right life insurance a breeze.
In just minutes, you can compare quotes from the top insurers to find your best price.
You could save $1,500 or more a year by using Policy Genius to compare life insurance policies.
Why waste money?
Why do the work yourself if you don't have to?
Once you apply, the PolicyGenius team will handle all the paperwork and red tape for free.
And PolicyGenius doesn't make life insurance easy.
We can help you find the right home and auto insurance or disability insurance too.
So even if you look back on the triple denim dirt days and distress, you'll never be distressed about life insurance with Policy Genius.
In just a few minutes, you can find your best price and apply at policygenius.com.
Super easy to use, folks.
That's policygenius.com.
We get all, we get things wrong from time to time.
At least we can get life insurance right with policygenius.com.
That's policygenius.com.
Go check them out today.
All right, Joe, let's go.
And there it is.
All right, before I get to the dirty dozen, there's maybe a dozen or so talking points on the Spygate thing, which is just amazing.
I want to get to this first.
You know, the Democrats, the radical far-left Democrats, you may be asking yourself, by the way, do you like the haircut?
It's a Paula Bongino special.
I like it.
She likes it.
Had a good weekend.
Didn't use a Flobie, did you?
So it's all... What's that?
No, no Flobie.
Yeah, this was just a standard old rate.
So she did a good job.
Joe, you may want to go with this look.
It's super easy to make name.
But getting back Back to the important stuff today.
Why are the Democrats terrified of the economy opening?
Why do they want a national shutdown?
Let's put the bottom line up front, folks.
Ladies and gentlemen, they have three goals right now that are becoming readily apparent.
I'm going to produce the evidence here to show you I'm right.
The three goals for continuing to bankrupt you, your family, your children, your grandchildren, and cause the Great Suppression, as it's become known on Twitter.
Goal number one.
They have clear ideological goals.
They are leveraging the Rahm Emanuel theory of never, and that's a capital N, never let a crisis go to waste.
Their ideological goals are clear.
Don't worry.
I'll produce the proof for you shortly.
Second, they want to destroy the president.
Obviously.
I have some evidence there too, that this is starting to take its toll.
And I think the president is well aware of that fact.
Remember, none of this has to do with saving lives.
I haven't mentioned that yet, Joe, because we're not even there yet.
No, we're not.
Because none of the Democrats' goals, the radical ones, I'm not talking about voting Democrats, or have anything to do with any of the science or any of that stuff.
Goal number three, they want to destroy conservative media and pin this crisis on them.
Got the evidence of that, too.
All right, let's get right to it.
First, let's get to some video.
Here is Nancy Pelosi, the dreadful, atrocious, really one of the worst politicians in the history of the United States based on the damage she's incurring on this country or in putting into this country by her activities every day.
Here's Pelosi on Fox News Sunday, living in a total bubble, pretending to not understand why these economic shutdowns are so destructive.
And she goes right back to identity politics when questioned on this matter.
In other words, Chris Wallace from Fox News says to her, if your narrative going forward is going to be that President Trump basically and the Republicans didn't effectively warn people about this virus, then why were you in San Francisco's Chinatown telling people, come on out, no big deal?
Watch how she goes because she knows she's nailed to the wall on this.
She goes right back to identity politics.
Check this out.
As you are right now, have been very critical of President Trump, especially for what you say is the time that he lost initially in January and February in responding to the virus.
But I want to point out that on February 24th, you went on a walking tour of Chinatown to try to promote tourism there.
And here's some of what you had to say.
That's what we're trying to do today, is to say everything is fine here.
Come, because precautions have been taken.
We think it's very safe to be in Chinatown and hope that others will come.
If the president underplayed the threat in the early days, Speaker Pelosi, didn't you as well?
No, what we're trying to do is to end the discrimination, the stigma that was going out against the Asian American community.
And in fact, if you will look, the record will show that our Chinatown has been a model of containing and preventing the virus.
So I'm confident in our folks there and thought it was necessary to offset some of the things that the president and others were saying about Asian Americans and making them a target, a target, of violence across the country and in fact some hate crimes
have been committed.
Now, I'm here to decipher this for you, what's actually going on. Again, the question you should
have in your mind now, we've been referring to for two weeks now, is why did the Democrats,
like Nancy Pelosi, who's on tape, telling everyone, "Don't panic, folks,
We'll get through this.
Don't panic.
Come on down to Chinatown, shop, do your thing.
Why did the very same Democrats who suggested you shouldn't panic and you should handle this all calmly, Come on down and shop, do your thing.
Why did they then, as I've said before, flip the panic switch?
Almost on a dime to say, now panic!
Panic all over.
Panic everywhere.
Shut it down everywhere.
Keep it shut down.
Because the panic switch enables them to advance a story, not the story.
And a story they find useful right now is if we blame these deaths on President Trump, we can damage him at the polls.
That was goal number two I just mentioned.
Goal number one, we can use aforementioned panic to advance ideological goals of our... I'll get to that in a second.
Third, the panic button is useful because then we can blame conservatives for underselling this panic.
Don't worry, folks.
We could say Fox News said don't worry about this, and we know the media, because they're helpless losers, will ignore the fact that we said the same thing.
Hat tip for Chris Wallace for finally nailing Pelosi to the wall on that one.
But no one in the other media will actually call out Pelosi for doing the same thing.
Please tell me this is making sense.
Question, why did they flip the panic switch?
Answer, because panic is useful politically now, and it wasn't back then.
Mm-hmm.
Now, in order to memory hole and pretend none of the Democrats in their media's prior, don't worry, don't panic comments.
Remember, before Joe, they decided to flip the panic switch when panic wasn't useful to them yet.
Right.
And why did it become useful?
Because they sensed a growing concern amongst Americans about the lethality and contagiousness of this virus.
Well, we can use this panic now.
This is real panic.
Yeah.
How do we use this politically?
Because that's what these slimy sleazebags do.
Now, to memory hole everything they said about don't panic, pre-panic switch flipping, they have to find a reason here that they said that.
And the reason, according to Pelosi, is identity politics.
Preventing discrimination is important.
That has nothing to do with any of this.
She's making this whole thing up.
Now, identity politics is one thing.
But I want you to watch this clip.
One of the most disturbing, pathetic, from a really pathetic person, Joy Reid, a failed human being at life.
Remember her with her homophobic, nonsensical stuff that she said she alleges someone else wrote on a blog and all this other weirdo stuff she wrote on there?
We'll leave her explanations for another day, but this is the hapless, collusion, hoaxing, lying Joy Reid on with another, Keith Ellison, who's been accused of some very serious stuff, by the way, by some of the people in his own life.
Here's Joy Reid from MSNBC on with Keith Ellison, another hapless Democrat.
They manage in one clip, Joe.
To pull out, I had to write this down because I don't want to forget.
Identity politics, the incitement of violence, which Pelosi mentioned too.
This is another fake media now.
Trump's inciting violence.
And then they also managed to throw in a class warfare thing to explain why Trump is responsible for all this.
Check this out.
When the first black family moves in and black people being left in a situation where they're more vulnerable by default, less health care, jobs that are hourly, jobs where you're closer to people stuck working near to each other.
When you hear Donald Trump talking in this sort of faux-Confederate language about these lockdown orders, which are meant to save lives, and you see people with these insta-protests paid for by activists for the super-rich egging on this kind of activity that could get violent, what does that say to you?
It says to me that the president is willing to risk the lives of people who believe in him so that he can have advantages like re-election and things like that.
He's literally willing to sacrifice the lives of Americans for personal gain.
And that's deeply disturbing to me.
So again, let me walk you through this.
Pelosi has to, she needs a retcon.
She needs to rewrite history as to why she told people not to panic.
Because now the Democrats find panic useful.
They find panic useful because a panic will continue, this is where I'm going with this, will continue these economic shutdowns if they can panic people enough.
We have to stay off the streets.
No one can open their business ever.
They need the panic.
So my first clip, that's Nancy Pelosi rewriting why she told people not to panic.
I was protecting against discrimination.
This is the hapless, alleged writer of homophobic posts, Joy Reid, on MSNBC with another disturbing individual, Keith Ellison.
Again, They need these shutdowns to continue, so she manages to marshal in three reasons why these economic shutdowns could continue.
Well, clearly this is racist against black people, she brings out first, which is unbelievably absurd.
Then she says, Joe, and these protesters are inciting violence.
The Democrat go-to, as I said to my wife this weekend, that talking point should be ignored completely because it's a lie and it's just made up by Democrats because stupid media types like the knucklehead in the media briefing this weekend with Donald Trump on Sunday asked Donald Trump, are you inciting violence?
They should never answer that question.
It's a lie.
It's made up.
No one's inciting violence.
Unless you are telling people to be violent, you are not inciting violence.
That's a stupid Democrat talking point.
It's an unserious one.
But Joy Reid manages to fit that in too, Joe, as a reason for these shutdowns.
These protesters are inciting violence.
She has no evidence at all because she's a liar.
She's a disgrace to any serious media person out there.
But then she manages to fit in, too, Joe, remarkably another talking point.
Identity politics, inciting violence.
Did you hear it, Joe?
The third one?
The third one is, and this is paid for by rich people, class warfare, too!
In the same talking point!
In one minute, Joe, we have remarkably three classic Democrat lying, disgusting go-tos.
Everything's identity politics.
Yep.
Conservatives and protesters are inciting violence, and this is all class warfare because rich people did this.
I can guarantee you the protesters in Maryland, in Michigan, in Illinois, and in states around the country, in Virginia and elsewhere, are not being paid by millionaire donors, you morons.
But leftist morons don't do facts.
Facts aren't really their thing.
So you may ask yourself, like, where's Joy Reid getting these talking points?
Probably from her Democrat focus group tested ally hacks, because she's not smart enough to think of these talking points herself.
The only talking points she thinks of were alleged homophobic posts she wrote, which are pretty gross, but you need an FBI investigation on that, remember?
But Joy and the Democrats realize right now, That there's an anger brewing, and that people are starting to question everything.
Yeah.
Wait, why is my business closed and that business isn't?
So you can go to a supermarket and touch the produce, but you can't go to another place to buy seeds to plant your own?
Huh?
So you can get in a canoe, but not a speedboat, or a speedboat, not a canoe?
You can travel to your cabin in the woods if you live out of state, but not if you live in state, Michigan?
People are smart.
You are.
That's not virtue signaling.
The American people are smart and entrepreneurial.
There's a reason that we're the most successful country in the history of sentient beings.
It's not because we're all idiots.
It's because we figure stuff out.
Because we work hard, we figure it out, and we connect the neurons and we make stuff happen.
We build stuff, we make stuff, and we think of stuff that has to be built in order to make stuff we thought about.
Stuff matters, we make stuff.
We feed people.
We feed the world.
We have been a beacon of prosperity and hope for eons, since the inception of this great republic.
Why do the Democrats want to continue to shut this down?
The answer is because these radical Democrats don't give a damn about you, ladies and gentlemen, your kids, or anything else.
They have three goals which I opened up with.
Now let's produce some evidence that what I'm telling you is true.
Why does Joy Reid, why does Nancy Pelosi want this economy and you buried and done for?
Don't forget this because it's a fact and you know it.
This is what they're afraid of.
Let's look at Real Clear Politics, this article.
It's in the show notes by Stephen Moore.
It is well done.
The show notes are available if you go to bongino.com slash newsletter.
I will email you these articles every day.
It is worth your time.
Beware of the left's degrowth movement.
Folks, big leftist groups, fake environmentalists, they're not real environmentalists.
They're really former communists who become environmentalists, who hate capitalism.
They think this is great.
They think this degrowth movement Degrowth, which is code word, Joe, for bankrupting you, your kids, your business, your grandkids, and everyone around you while you suffer with no job, no money, lose your house, and potentially lose your car.
The left, some of them think this is wonderful.
From the real clear piece, read this whole thing in the show notes.
It is worth your time.
A former high-ranking climate advisor to the Obama administration, Jason Bordoff, writes in Foreign Policy Magazine that COVID-19 may deliver some short-term climate benefits, Joe, by curbing energy use or even longer-term benefits if economic stimulus is linked to climate goals.
Wow.
That's wonderful, Dan.
But he adds, almost regretfully, that the quote, benefits from the pandemic in terms of less carbon emissions are likely to be fleeting and negligible.
Degrowth is defended by its proponents as a political, economic, and social movement based on ecological economics, anti-consumerism, and anti-capitalism.
Oh, Dan, those are just a few radicals.
Are they?
Really?
They're just a few radicals, former Obama folks here and there?
A couple of fringe groups out there.
Then if you asked yourself, if there's just a few of them, why are so many of them on the Democratic side, despite evidence that their shutdowns have not been particularly effective in doing what they stated?
Or that these shutdowns have been so effective, but they don't have a particular exit plan.
Why are the Democrats so eager to keep them going without any exit plan for you?
You may say, Dan, they have an exit plan.
Their exit plan, they said was, we need more testing and we need more contact tracing.
Ladies and gentlemen, as was brought up in a couple of newspaper articles, that's your exit plan?
Testing and contact tracing.
How are you going to do that in DC or New York?
How are you going to do that?
You're going to, every person that gets on the Metro in DC, who later comes down with COVID, you're going to contact trace every single person that got on the Metro that morning, basically all of Washington, DC that lives in that area.
How are you going to do that?
The reason, ladies and gentlemen, they're not giving you an exit plan is because they don't want an exit.
Because these de-growthers are more powerful than you think they are.
These are not radical far-left groups.
They're radical, but they're not fringe.
These are groups that have seeped into the mainstream of Democrat thinking.
Second.
So first, they want to meet their ideological goals.
Second.
This is destroying the president's approval ratings, ladies and gentlemen.
Not that your public safety should ever, ever be subordinated to polls.
Don't dare misconstrue what I'm saying and put out disinformation.
I'm suggesting to you that they want to continue this shutdown despite a no-exit plan, and despite the fact that it's going to bankrupt this country.
And ladies and gentlemen, as I tweeted out of Wall Street Journal, you say, ironically, Joe?
Is bankrupting hospitals and ripping apart our healthcare infrastructure.
Tell me again how that's a good beacon for public safety in the future?
You're gonna have no hospital to go to soon because they're being bankrupted.
No, has anyone not thought that through?
This is for public safety.
There's gonna be no public safety infrastructure if you continue this.
Look at this article by Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner.
This has a political benefit for the Democrats.
Clearly!
More coronavirus fallout.
Trump approval shows the sharpest drop Gallup has recorded.
Look at this screen capture from the piece.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is doing real damage.
America's ratings of Trump performance improved in mid-March when the novel coronavirus threat demanded federal efforts to contain the spread.
Trump addressed the nation, it goes on, and basically says that now they're reflective of their assessment of his performance and an overall souring mood as the employment rate and death toll continue to climb, said the polling company, trying to discuss why his poll numbers are dropping dramatically.
Again, what I'm suggesting to you is they don't care about what's going on in your house.
You're evaporating paycheck, you're disappearing refrigerator content, The emptying food closets in your kitchen.
I don't call them pantries.
I hate it.
The misery and stress being caused by you not being able to go to work.
None of that matters.
Their ideological goals are being met and they are effectively destroying President Trump's approval ratings.
Finally, point number three.
This shutdown serves their interests in blaming conservative media, Fox News, anyone they can blame it on.
Despite the fact that there were people at Fox in the beginning that were saying the same thing a lot of people in the media were.
Don't panic.
Panic's not going to help.
Panic kills.
They want to blame it off.
Look at this disgusting article from a New York Times columnist this weekend, who I'm going to show you how this is totally phony, too.
This is all made up, but it serves their interests.
Look, you don't believe me?
I'll show you a tweet from the woman who wrote this in a minute to show you what a huge fraud she is.
So they write this article about this guy, tragic, this guy Joe Joyce, who was 74, a non-smoker.
Four years after he opened this bar, he stopped drinking completely and he didn't see a problem.
They decided to take a cruise, right?
And listen to why they try to blame why he took this cruise.
Because he watched Fox and believed it was under control, this lady told the author.
Early in March, Sean Hannity went on air proclaiming that he didn't like the way American people were getting scared unnecessarily.
He saw it all, he said, as like a bludgeon.
Let's bludgeon Trump with a new hoax.
You see what's going on there?
Don't be confused.
It is a New York Times columnist suggesting that it was Fox that downplayed the virus while they were out ahead of it, Joe.
And because of that, this guy contracted the coronavirus.
Oh my gosh, it's Fox's fault.
What does that have to do with the shutdown?
They need the panic.
The panic, they have to keep writing stories.
The panic will continue the shutdown because people will panic and the panic will also lead people to believe this is the worst health crisis in the history of humankind and that Fox and other people did this by playing it down.
You know what's odd?
The author of this piece, hat tip comfortably smug on Twitter, by the way, The author of this piece, Joe, who's blaming Fox, tweeted this on February 27th.
The hapless, disturbing, Jania Belafonte, who wrote this piece.
Tweeted, I fundamentally don't understand the panic.
Incidence of the disease is declining in China.
Virus is not deadly in vast majority of cases.
Production and so on will slow down and will obviously rebound.
CC, at Opinion Joe.
Hmm.
Oh.
Yeah.
Oh.
No, Joe.
No, no.
She didn't play it down.
Those are her words and her truth.
The author of that pathetic, disgusting, filthy New York Times column?
It's not her who played it down.
It's Fox News that did this.
They got people killed.
Those are her exact words on Twitter.
Who really played this down?
Maybe the more likely story, ladies and gentlemen, the truth?
Is that in January and February, nobody knew how serious this was going to be, it was going to become?
As I said on Fox News this morning?
The R0, the contagiousness of the virus, the lethality of it?
Nobody knew.
Because the Chinese were misinforming and disinforming people.
Blaming Fox?
They need panic to do that, because they know the media will cover for them, like Miss Jania Belafonte, who did the exact same thing.
Which, by the way, was the right thing.
Don't panic.
Keep in mind, it's not me suggesting Jania Belafonte, whatever name is there, is wrong.
I'm simply suggesting I believe that was the right approach.
Then from everyone who said it, don't panic, don't panic, don't panic.
But now they flipped the panic switch because panic has become useful in destroying Trump, advancing their agenda, and destroying conservative media.
And the dopey slobs in the media just play along, despite the fact knowing we have the evidence that they did the same thing.
All right, let me get to my second sponsor.
I got some really just explosive stuff.
I hate stuff that's gonna blow your mind.
All right, today's show also brought to you by buddies at Stamps.com.
For all our sakes, we need to avoid crowds any way we can right now.
But what if you need to go to the post office?
Well, if you need postage to send out letters and packages, if you need that, you're gonna go to the post office?
Well, don't worry, stamps.com, stamps.com is here to help.
How?
Anything you can do at the post office, you can do at stamps.com.
We do it right here in the Bongino household, thanks to stamps.com.
You can print postage on demand.
You can skip those lines and crowds at the post office.
Plus, you can actually save some money, in our case, a lot of money, with discounts you can't even get at the post office.
This is a win, win, win, win, win, win.
Stamps.com brings all the services of the US Postal Service right to your computer
in the safety and comfort of your own home office or anywhere else you're hunkering down right now.
You a small business sending invoices and online sellers shipping out products,
working from home, you need to mail stuff, Stamps.com can handle it all with ease.
Simply use your computer to print official US.
postage 24-7 for any letter, any package, any class of mail, anywhere you want to send it.
When your mail's ready, you just leave it for your mail carrier, schedule a free package pickup, or drop it in the mailbox.
No human contact is even required.
It's really that simple.
And like I said, with Stamps.com, you get great discounts, too.
Five cents off every first-class stamp and up to 40% off USPS shipping rates.
And now, in addition to offering discounted postal service rates, Stamps.com also offers UPS services with discount rates up to 62%!
Plus with Stamps.com, you won't even have to pay UPS residential surcharges.
Stamps.com is a no-brainer.
Saves time, saves money.
Keeps you safe in these crazy times.
Right now, our listeners get a special offer.
It includes a four-week trial plus free postage and a digital scale without any long-term commitment.
Just go to stamps.com, click on the microphone at the top of the homepage, and type in Dan.
That's stamps.com.
Enter Dan, D-A-N, by clicking on the microphone at the top of the homepage.
Stamps.com.
Stay safe, my friends.
Okay.
Folks, there has just been, and I don't believe this is a coincidence, a deluge.
I mean, drinking from a firehose of information that has come out on the Spygate thing, I say I don't think it's a coincidence, because I think they are, some of the people here understand the news cycle, obviously, has been heavily populated with Uh, Wuhan virus stories.
And I think they think a lot of this will go away, but not on this show.
It's not going anywhere because we're staying on top of all of it.
I have major hat tips here at Climate Audit, Steven McIntyre, Hans Mackey.
I'm, forgive me if I'm saying your name wrong.
Another great account on Twitter, 279, undercover Huber, the great at John W. Huber on Twitter, Technofog, everyone.
I want to make sure I appropriately hat tip everybody involved in this.
I have put together, A puzzle here for you based on all of those sources and some more that I think is going to blow your mind.
The end of it is going to be, did the FBI claim Trump was colluding with the Russians based on information they got from a guy they thought was colluding with the Russians?
Hold that thought for a moment because I want to get to, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
All righty then.
Hold that thought!
Because this is going to get really sweet.
Let me get to some other things first on that.
I want to dispel some myths.
Number one, I want to get rid of once and for all this, why golly, we were tricked by Russian disinformation.
It's a new narrative out there.
The narrative goes like this.
Well, now that we know, based on the IG report, that the FBI suspected there may have been Russian disinformation in Steele's reporting, which they used to get a FISA to spy on the Trump team.
You copy?
Yeah.
Their new narrative is going to be in the media, and I believe with many at the upper levels of the bureau trying to cover this up, they're going to say, Well, we were tricked by the Russians with Russian disinformation.
No, you were not.
This was a Hillary disinformation campaign from the start.
You guys bought it hook, line, and sinker because a lot of you hated Trump.
And it was just a bunch of lies.
Stop the nonsense, okay?
I'm getting tired of this.
Russian disinformation line.
The information was fake and it was attributed to real Russians.
They knew that.
But how do we know Hillary's team was involved in this from the start?
Well, obviously they paid for the dossier.
But hat tip to Hans Monke again and Stephen McIntyre for this.
There's some really good clips out there, ladies and gentlemen, in the past that pretty much show from the start the Hillary team was involved in a disinformation campaign in turn with their FBI buddies.
Let's go to first this photo of dossier number 95, memo number 95 in late July.
I want to read this to you and then I want to play something for you from Robbie Mook, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager.
Check this out.
Read the language here.
This is dossier number 95 from Christopher Steele, importantly in late July.
We don't know the exact date, but it's right around late July of 2016.
Look at the language in there.
The reason for using WikiLeaks was plausible deniability, and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team.
So just to be clear, Christopher Steele, paid for by Hillary through her intermediaries, puts out dossier memo number 95, Joe, and in late July, we don't know the exact date, but this is important, and says, yes, WikiLeaks leaked this stuff, and they did it with full knowledge of the Trump team.
Well, what else happens in late July?
Joe, total coincidence, I'm sure.
Robbie Mook, Hillary Clinton's deputy, the guy running the campaign at this time, appears in late July in this exact same time frame on one of the leftist news networks.
And he almost mimics exactly the language in the dossier.
How would he know that if this was a Russian disinformation campaign and not a political operation by Hillary and Robby Mook?
Listen to Robby Mook echo this exact same language that just happens to come out at the same time as this media appearance.
Here's some evidence for you.
What's disturbing to us is that experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails, and other experts are now saying that the Russians are releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump.
I don't think it's coincidental that these emails were released on the eve of our convention here.
Wow.
Isn't that crazy?
Wow.
Echoing the whole WikiLeaks-Russian link in conjunction with Donald Trump.
And amazingly, Joey says, I don't think it's a coincidence.
I don't think, Robbie, it's a coincidence either that in late July, as you're feeding this information to the FBI and others through your campaign's political oppo research operation, you happen to go on CNN and echo the words of the dossier or the sentiments of it almost exactly.
But Joe, it was a Russian disinformation campaign, not a Hillary op.
Crazy how Hillary's people seem to be getting the same Russian disinformation at the same time.
Isn't that weird?
I thought Trump was colluding with the Russians.
So let's just throw that baby and bury that sucker right now.
Let's throw the baby and the bathwater out at the same time.
There are no Russian disinformation.
It's fake.
It was always fake.
They were not duped by the Russians.
This was a political operation.
My gosh, stop the nonsense.
Let's move on.
The great Devin Nunes made an appearance on Fox this weekend.
Did you catch it?
If you didn't, you missed it.
An absolute gem.
Joe, do you have the Noon Yes Translator?
Initiating Noon Yes Translator, Dan.
There you go.
I am going to translate for you what I think Devin Nunes is saying in this cut, because this gem from Fox and Friends this weekend, he just blows the doors off something I've thought for a very long time, and we'll see.
He has two talking about him.
Why don't you pay attention to he mentions three Russians in the beginning of this clip, and then he mentions a period in 2016 when the CIA gave stuff to the FBI.
Listen to this cut, and I will do my Nunes translation on the other side of it.
Check this out.
You have the three dossiers that have to be investigated.
I'm also interested in three Russians, actually Russian-Americans, that we're looking into.
And then I would say finally, In 2016, we know from great work that Trey Gowdy did at the time in questioning that the CIA gave information over to the FBI in 2016.
We now are laser focused on that.
We need to know exactly what did the CIA give to the FBI in 2016.
That's what our investigation is now focusing on.
Oh, man.
The gems in that one.
Remember that cartoon, Jem?
She's truly outrageous.
Remember that?
Every single cartoon ever I had on in my house.
We had like three generations of kids in there all the time.
Well, maybe not generations.
That's probably a gross exaggeration, but what the Jems in there.
So Jem number one, and I'm guessing what he's saying here, but when I say guessing, guessing based on a lot of homework I've done on this case in the past year, In conjunction with info from 279 and others.
So he's very concerned about three Russians.
I'm gonna throw this out there.
Is it possible, again, That, as I've said to you from the start, that everyone knew the Steele information was fake, including Robby Mook and others who were promoting it in July of 2016.
Steele information's fake.
It's a lie.
The dossier's a lie.
It's a hoax, folks.
It's a total hoax.
It's not Russian disinformation.
It's slivers of it, maybe.
But the allegations in there, the PP tape, it's all made up.
It's garbage.
It was always made up.
Is it possible, just possible, I'm gonna leave this here.
That it's fake intelligence.
Yes, that's not possible, that's true.
But is it possible it's fake intelligence attributed to real Russians?
Who are these three Russians?
And if it is fake intel made to look real by being attributed to Russians, then where did they get the names of the Russians?
How would you know?
Audience referee Armacost, you kind of pick up what I'm putting down here.
I got to be careful here, folks.
Yes, I do, Dan.
Yeah.
Because I don't want to make too many leaps.
No, you're good.
But if you wanted to make information that was a lie look real.
That's right.
By attributing it to real Russians who didn't say it.
Not their info.
Then how would you know what real Russians to attribute the information to, to make it look real?
Who would know that?
Real Russian sources?
I'm just gonna leave that one right there.
Who would have a library of legitimate Russian intel sources that they could pin fake information on?
Oh, yeah, chew on that one for a few minutes.
[BLANK_AUDIO]
Nunes is not an idiot, okay?
Despite all of the Democrats.
The Democrats are terrified of Nunes because I think Nunes has a pretty decent grasp of the scope of this scandal.
But he said something else, moving on.
I'm not going to make too many leaps here.
He said something else in that, too.
He said, you know, in 2016, the CIA gave some information to the FBI that me and Gowdy were looking into.
I'm talking for Nunes, not me and Gowdy, but Nunes and Gowdy.
And we find it really interesting.
We want to find out exactly what they were saying.
It kind of sounds like something you've been hearing on this show for the last year and a half, doesn't it?
Ladies and gentlemen, I have said to you from the start, the FBI is complicit in this.
They have no quarter for them whatsoever.
They know the case is fake at the absolute latest by January of 2017.
They know the case is fake probably by the summer of 2016.
But January of 2017, excuse me, they absolutely know it's fake because they're talking to steel sources who are saying, I don't know what you're talking about.
But I do believe that John Brennan's the puppet master here.
That John Brennan is working a series of intelligence back channels.
That's important.
I'm going to get to that in a second.
That's next.
He's working a series of intelligence back channels, not a formal channels.
Why?
Because if John Brennan goes through formal established intelligence channels, Everybody reading the pee-pee tape stuff through these former channels is going to laugh, Joe, and say, this is the dumbest garbage I've ever heard.
This guy steals an idiot.
So Brennan has to wash this information through back channels to make sure it doesn't go through formal channels so the stupid information from fake sources pinned to real Russians will sound real.
And back channels, and political back channels, and the media are the only way to do that.
Because formal channels will make this look as dumb as it really is.
So I believe in the summer of 2016, what Nunes is referring to, the CIA is feeding information to the FBI.
Maybe pinning it to people that it's not really from, pretending it's really real.
But they're feeding information to the FBI through politicians.
In other words, Brennan giving it to Harry Reid and others who are then giving it to the FBI to make them believe they have a serious case.
The problem is, Joe, as I've said to you from the start, there is no serious case.
Everybody's getting the information from one place.
That is the steel reporting and it is all a lie.
Let's go back.
For time number 65,222, Lisa Page's testimony to Mark Meadows, where Lisa Page, the FBI lawyer, is confused when Meadows asks her precisely if she thinks the FBI is getting the information from the CIA, and it's the same info!
She says, Lisa Page to Meadows, I do know that.
I know the information found its way to a lot of different places in October of 2016.
But if the CIA as early as August had those same reports, she's talking about Steele's reports, folks.
She says, I'm not aware of that, nor do I believe they provided them to us.
That would be unusual.
This is the one rare moment of honesty you are getting from Lisa Page here, ladies and gentlemen.
I do not think she is lying.
She is confused because she believes the information coming to them from politicians, from John Brennan, is from a different source, when in fact it is all from the same source.
That is Christopher Steele.
It's a lie.
It is a lie.
If you're watching it, you get the joke.
Like, you can come back to me now.
Watching on YouTube.
Go to youtube.com slash Bongino.
You'll pick it up.
Don't cut that out.
That's my cues.
That means back to me.
It's a lie.
It's a lie.
The, the Steele dossier is a lie.
It's making its way to all of these places and back to the FBI.
They think it's multiple people telling the same story.
Joe robbed the bank.
Joe robbed the, Joe must've robbed the bank.
20 people saying it.
No, but only one person saying it, the guy who doesn't like Joe and it's all made up.
Now, showing you again how this whole story is falling apart now for them.
I want to get to next.
This is all a myth.
This whole thing is a farce.
It's a nonsense story started by Steele and their little cabal of idiots, their hacklet people and others over in the UK.
They started this whole thing.
The whole thing is nonsense.
I want to get to that in a second.
I want to get to my final read because I want to roll through this because it's important.
We have great sponsors and I appreciate their time.
Ladies and gentlemen, today's show also brought to you by our buddies at Ducan.
I have a bunch of their stuff here, which I use every day.
Working Man's Face Wash.
You can't beat that.
We got the cologne that came in handy this weekend for date night.
We have their Oak Bower cologne.
Ducan, look at that.
Got a big chunk out of it.
This is their solid cologne, which I love.
And you have their new body wash.
Thick, thick body wash.
Hi, this guy.
Look at that stuff.
Smells like productivity.
Sure does.
Try it.
Listen, you got to wash yourself anyway.
You might as well smell like manhood and success, right?
Thin is In.
But what about a thin steak or a thin wallet or thinning hair?
No good.
No dice.
The answer to these rhetorical questions is nothing.
So why then is every brand of men's body wash so weak and watered down and pathetic, frankly?
Well, any argument for using this crap is thin.
Enter thick.
Here it is.
I love this stuff.
I have two of these.
I have another one in the shower.
I took this one out.
This is great.
It's a new product from Duke Canada Supply Company.
Thick earns its name for being three times thicker than common body washes.
You put it on, you gotta like really squeeze it cause the stuff comes out pretty thick.
It's the high viscosity alternative to watching your money run down the drain.
Thick comes in a big ass container like this, check this out, that will crack open like a brewski and it comes in four distinctly masculine scents that won't leave you smelling like a teenage boy band.
Thin is out.
Thick is in.
We hope you enjoy opening up our American-made products.
We find that they're as functional as they are fun.
Gotta wash yourself anyway.
Smell like manhood now.
I love this stuff.
Handy.
Came in handy this weekend.
We had a... I'll leave that for now.
Ducanon Thick High Viscosity Body Wash.
$9 each or all four for $30, lasts a long time too.
Because it's thick, you don't need that much of it.
A modern and clean citrus profile, balanced, that's their accomplishment smell, balanced with sandalwood and oakmoss.
They have naval supremacy, a refreshing ocean scent with notes of fresh water, musk, and bergamot.
Old glory, a rich, sophisticated, and classically masculine scent that blends notes of tobacco, cedarwood, and amber.
I probably said one of those wrong.
Productivity and invigorating and uplifting combination of peppermint, pine, and eucalyptus scents.
You've had enough of the thin gruel that your current crappy body wash, Thick, is made with plant-based thickeners for superior lather.
You're not going to need that gross loofah anymore.
And as an added bonus, when you have the 17 and a half ounce bottle of Thick, you're going to get a light arm workout.
Visit dukecanon.com, use promo code BONGINO for 15% off your entire order.
Free shipping with orders over $35.
A range of Duke Canon men's premium products are also available at your local Target.
Go to dukecanon.com, dukecanon.com, use promo code BONGINO for 15% off.
Looks like a beverage.
It's not.
Don't drink it.
Okay.
So getting back to this.
How this thing has been a fake the whole time.
They ran this fake through multiple channels and are trying to pull a head fake on you about the origin story.
We see another bombshell that came out this week, and we think coincidentally.
So we had Nunes' information.
Big shocker.
We have all these dossier declassifications and IG report declassifications coming out.
Big shocker.
But we also have this, I'll get to it in a second, a gem by the Sydney Morning Herald.
But before we get to that, I want to debunk one other myth.
Now we're starting to figure this out too.
I want you to look at this IG report, page 367, because one of the things, when all of this is starting to come out now, one of the leftist narratives along with, oh shucks, it was Russian disinformation, we got fooled, we'll do better in the future.
One of the other silly medium narratives, not backed up by any evidence or fact, Joe, is that they weren't spying on the Trump campaign, they were spying on Carter Page!
And Carter Page had already left the Trump campaign when we got the FISA.
Part?
That part is accurate.
When they get the FISA in October on Carter Page to spy on him, who was a member of the Trump campaign, he had already left the Trump campaign.
But see, the media doesn't do any homework for you, but we do here.
Hat tip undercover Huber, the great undercover Huber on Twitter.
That's his highlight there.
Oh, look at this in the IG report, Joe!
We also believe that as the case, we're talking about the Carter Page case, proceeded, and the FBI gathered substantial evidence of Page's past electronic communications.
How's that, Joseph?
How is that?
Past communications?
Yes.
You mean when he was on the team?
I thought we were told they weren't spying on the Trump campaign!
Of course the media are idiots and aren't going to tell you the truth.
But there it is, smack dab in the IG report, that the FBI was looking at Carter Page's past.
Past.
You know, like the opposite of future?
Past.
P-A-S-T.
Can you spell, not past, past.
P-A-S-T.
Communications when he was on the Trumps.
I thought you said that didn't happen.
Because you're numbskulls and you don't read.
Well, you do read and you just ignore it.
So we can throw that talking point out there too.
But here's another fascinating little bombshell that came out this week and perfect timing for this one.
The Sydney Morning Herald.
Gosh, what was the story we were always told, Joe?
This case started because this Australian diplomat spoke with Papadopoulos, a foreign policy advisor on the Trump team, and Papadopoulos told this Australian downer, hey, the Russians have stuff that could be damaging to Hillary.
The FBI says, that's why we started this whole thing.
Really?
And they said, Joe, what was downers?
Here's the article, by the way, just came out this weekend.
Sydney Morning Herald.
Downer raised Russian concerns at U.S.
Embassy without government approval.
Shocking.
There's two takeaways from this.
What did I tell you about before?
Brennan used a backchannel, unofficial intelligence channels, to shuttle this information to politicians, to get it to the FBI, to spy on Trump.
Because if he put it through official channels, Brennan and his team would have been laughed at about the pee-pee tape and the other stupid allegations in the dossier on Trump, which are all lies and made up.
So they had to use a backchannel.
Now we find out Downer had to use a backchannel so he didn't even have government approval to pass this information on?
To U.S.
counterparts, but hey, I had this meeting with this guy, Papadopoulos.
He said this thing, which Papadopoulos disputes, about the Russians having this information.
My gosh, golly.
But that's not the story they told originally, Joe.
Let's go to the Sydney Morning Herald first.
Here's the new, new, new, new, new story.
So, this is Malcolm Turnbull, the obviously political leader in Australia before this.
Trump was endorsed as a Republican candidate on July 19th.
There's that July period, Joe!
July 2016, the same time Robby Mook is on TV, CNN.
Trump was endorsed on July 19th, and that prompted Alexander to call on the U.S.
Charge d'Affaires, standing in for the ambassador, and tell him about the Papadopoulos discussion.
Wait, wait, there's another gem in this.
He had no authority from Canberra to do this.
And the first we heard of it in Australia was when the FBI turned up in London and wanted to interview Downer.
What?
What?
This reminds me of the amazing Spider-Man movie with Peter Parker with the charcoal all over his face and his aunt asked him, what were you doing?
He says, I was cleaning the chimney.
She says, we don't have a chimney.
He goes, what?
Wait, what?
So just to be clear on this, the FBI story, man, we had to open up a criminal investigation into Trump, a CI investigation into Trump and his team, because we got this official tip in July from Downer.
It wasn't even official.
He had to go through the back channel.
And Downer's original story was, And the original story around Downer Joe was he didn't...
Because Wikileaks released those emails, and Downer was so disturbed by the DNC leak, or the Wikileaks leak of the DNC emails, he felt that this could have had something to do with Papadopoulos.
But that, can you put that up again?
That's not what the news story is, Joe.
Where is Wikileaks in that again?
Can you put that up again?
Let's go to that first sentence, why Downer?
So Trump was endorsed as the Republican candidate, and that's what prompted Downer to call the U.S.
charge in a back channel?
That's not the story, Joe, they told us.
No, it's not.
That's not the story.
The story was Downer saw the WikiLeaks leak and that's why he did it.
Now we find out Downer did it because Trump was the nominee?
Sounds like a political motivation to me.
Sure does.
You may say, was that really the original story?
The WikiLeaks thing?
Don't take it from me.
Let's go to Canberra.
Let's go to Australia's own newspapers.
Here's the Canberra Times.
This is from December of 2019.
Pete Mitchell.
Pete Mitchell.
What is he, Top Gun?
Get the joke?
Is that Maverick?
Downer Russian tips sparked FBI Trump probe.
The Canberra Times.
Let's look at the reason back then.
Don't let this confuse you.
I'm going to explain all this for you.
All right.
Don't let all this stuff confuse you.
Here's the Canberra Times for 2018.
Remember, Downer was so concerned about the WikiLeaks leak, Joe.
That's why they went to the FBI through the charge.
Now they're saying, no, the only reason they do it is because Trump was the nominee.
But this is what they said back then.
They say the Harwoods report details how Mr. Downer sat on the information until July 26, four days after WikiLeaks publicly released hacked emails from the DNC!
Oh, that was your own story!
Jeez, that's awfully convenient.
WikiLeaks, yeah, yeah, we can say that.
We'll say the WikiLeaks, that's why we did it.
That's not what they're saying now.
This just came out, that Sydney Morning Herald piece.
So again, let's just thoroughly annihilate now, all coming out, declassifications, the Sydney Morning Herald piece, a couple of myths.
Number one, this was not a Russian disinformation campaign with Trump.
This was a Hillary political operation to hijack the FBI, in conjunction with the Obama administration, planned as early as the summer of 2016.
We already have the evidence.
And put out there by Robby Mook and others to spy on the Trump campaign for political reasons.
Number two, why was no official intelligence used to start this campaign?
Spying campaign of the Trump team?
Because it was all garbage and if they didn't run it through back channels, the Australians and others who didn't even use their own official channels we now know!
It would have been debunked immediately as garbage and they would have never gotten the Pfizer warrant.
Number three, why is Devin Nunes and others concerned about three Russians and information in 2016 the CIA gave to the FBI?
Because it was always a lie pinned on Russia.
I'm not done.
Today was a two-pager on the show.
real and when the information was passed from the CIA to Harry Reid and
politicians and others to give to the FBI was the CIA lying about where they
got this information from the whole time which is clearly the downer, Steele,
Halper, Simpson, Cabal and it is all a lie.
I'm not done. Today was a two-pager on the show. I'm not done.
You're going to need a shower with this.
You're going to need to shower yourself with this stuff when you're done with the show because you're going to feel dirty.
You don't want to smell like Spygate.
Smell like manhood.
So now that we've shredded the myth that this was a serious case, it wasn't, it was based on a lie.
Shredded the myth that Hillary's team, oh, they didn't know what was going on.
They were on tape.
Shredded the myth that any of this was real.
I want to get to the coup de grace here.
I want to hat tip 279 here, sincerely, for some great work.
And undercover Huber.
I had to put a couple of information streams together.
But I need you to pay very close attention to this, and I'm going to put the headline up front.
The FBI knows this is fake.
The CIA knows this is all a lie.
It's a spying operation, political in nature only.
But was the FBI knowingly using what they thought at the time was Russian disinformation to collude with the Hillary team?
To claim Trump was using Russian information?
I tried to explain this to Paula this morning and I hope I'm getting it.
The whole story from the start has been Trump colluded with the Russians.
Was the FBI knowingly colluding with what they thought?
A Russian colluder?
To spy on Trump?
Oh boy, is this gonna get interesting.
Let me lay this out for you, what I mean by that.
The mysterious case of Sergei Millian continues.
Sergei Millian is an alleged source of steals.
Whether he was source-eed, it's always confusing.
Did they talk to Millian or not?
I'm going to put out some of the information on both sides.
Millian, of course, denies a lot of this, to be fair to him.
I'm just telling you, there's no question that the dossier, some of the information, is attributed to Millian.
Whether anyone ever spoke to Millian is an open question.
But what did the FBI know about Millian when they're claiming to use Millian's information to spy on Trump?
That's where this gets really hairy.
Let's lay it out.
Let's make the case for you.
Here's section 2, page 10 of the FISA warning, where they use this to spy on Donald Trump, of course.
Check this out.
And I want you to ask yourself, well, where did they get this from?
This is the FBI's application to spy on the Trump team.
You can see it right there.
Again, undercover Huber, these are his highlights.
As discussed below, Carter Page has established relationships with Russian government officials, including Russian intelligence officers, and has been identified by source reporting, Joe, as an intermediary with Russian leadership in a quote, well-developed conspiracy of cooperation to influence the 2016 US presidential election.
Where did they get that?
So the FBI is alleging in their warrant, which they're basing the warrant to spy on the Trump team, on the dossier, on, quote, a well-developed conspiracy.
Where did they get that language?
Ladies and gentlemen, it was literally cut and pasted from the dossier.
Here's the evidence right in front of you.
Look at this.
This is literally Steele's dossier.
Source E, believed to be Sergey Millian by many, An ethnic Russian close associate of Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump admitted there was, quote, a well-developed conspiracy of cooperation between them and the Russian leadership using Carter Page as an intermediary.
Ladies and gentlemen.
The FBI literally, you know I hate that word, it's the most overused word in the English language, cut and pasted the language of the dossier into a warrant to spy on Donald Trump.
A dossier that is fake.
It is totally fake, BS, false, made up, fabricated information.
Why does this matter?
Because they've got a huge issue right now, ladies and gentlemen.
They submitted that FISA On October 21st of 2016.
But now, what came out in these past couple weeks, past couple days?
Ladies and gentlemen, they had an active counterintelligence investigation.
They opened on October, between October 3rd and October 12th.
On Sergei Millian, too.
the alleged source of that information of Dossier.
[LAUGH]
What the?
So let's just be clear here what I'm telling you.
Yeah.
[BLANK_AUDIO]
They cut and paste information Steele says he got from Millian or his sources got from Millian in the dossier that Conspiracy talk.
They cut and paste it into a warrant to spy on a presidential candidate.
The same language they attribute to Millian.
While just a few weeks before, it's alleged that Millian's the subject of an active counterintelligence
investigation by the FBI for his contact with Russians.
Wait, what?
Come.
Did they?
inform the judge of that?
By the way, judge, the guy we're investigating for being a possible Russian colluder.
Some Russian spy in the country, Millian.
Their allegations, not mine.
The guy we're investigating.
and yet we're using his information to spy on a presidential candidate?
Sheesh.
Now you may say, well, this can't possibly get worse.
You're using information from a guy you believe is a Russian intermediary to spy on a presidential candidate.
This can't get worse.
It's right there.
You cut and pasted it.
You cut and pasted it.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's going to get worse, ladies and gentlemen, because as Stephen McIntyre says, there's a question of steel sources, who remember, Joe, the information they cut and pasted, they said they're getting familiar.
Right, right, right.
Source C, who people believe are familiar.
There's a question here.
Did these sources ever talk to Millian at all?
Who?
Let's go back to the IG report.
Hat tip, Stephen McIntyre.
The primary subsource, in other words, the guy who says, hey, I got this information from Millian, says he received a call, Joe, this is directly from the IG report from an individual He believed was the subsource, but was not certain of the person's identity, and the person never identified himself during the call.
Oh my gosh, what?
Folks, I'm sorry.
I know this is a bit complicated.
Please don't lose...
FBI spies on a presidential candidate using information from a guy they have an open investigation on for colluding with Russians.
An open investigation.
They cut and paste this information from a dossier into a FISA warrant while simultaneously they're unsure the information ever came from him at all.
What am I?
Oh.
Now, for the coup de gras on top of the coup de gras, which makes the coup de gras term meaningless.
A coup coup de gras.
You can't have a coup de gras on top of a coup de gras.
There's no penultimate coup de gras.
No.
Or else it's not a coup de gras.
But this is the real coup de gras.
Did the FBI have a Pfizer warrant?
On Sergei Millian the whole time.
Whoa!
Oh!
No!
So we know they had a counterintelligence investigation open on Millian as they're using Millian's information to spy on Trump while claiming to the IG they don't even know it came from Millian!
But why then would they use Millian's information if they're not sure Millian is even the guy on the call giving them the information?
Were they spying on Millian the whole time?
Was there a FISA on Millian too?
Oh!
Let's produce a little evidence for you here, kids!
So here's a text from Andrew McCabe on November 17th and 18th.
There's a text exchange here.
I've shown this text exchange before.
The Deputy Director of the FBI.
This is one of his, excuse me, emails and text exchanges here.
He says, I tried sending an email to Redacted, but it bounced back.
Are you getting the emails?
The deputy attorney general inquired about our plan regarding that Pfizer target, if he mobilizes, given the physical access he has.
Let me know if you get the email I forwarded from Tosh.
(laughing)
Now, we've used this text before in the show about who is Charlie, 'cause we don't know who Charlie is.
That was a whole other show.
Charlie is this mysterious person that's referenced in this, we need to get Charlie in the meeting with Trump.
We've attributed that possibly to Charlie, but is that target McCabe is talking about, that they're going to mobilize, that FISA target?
Is that Pfizer target?
Million?
Processes just for a moment.
[BLANK_AUDIO]
Does the FBI have an active warrant to spy on Millian?
They're getting information about Millian through their warrant, not from Millian himself.
In order to disguise the information, they're telling people to attribute information in the dossier to Millian, even though no one can, no one, no one's spoken to.
They can't even attribute it to Millian.
I showed you the screen cap.
I had a call with a guy, we think it's Millian, how'd you know?
I don't know, I guessed!
Is the real reason they're spying on Trump is because they're listening in on Millian in the first place?
And that's where they're getting a lot of this from?
Can you imagine if they have an open FISA on a guy they believe to be working with the Russians, Millian?
On this Pfizer, they're spying on Millian, Joe.
They find out that there is no collusion.
This is all a hoax.
How would they know?
They're listening to Millian.
They get nothing.
He's not talking about collusion.
He's talking about whatever, bonfire parties.
But because Millian has had some contact with Russians and they need to use him, someone gets wind and plants a little birdie and steals ear that, hey, just attribute this stuff to Millian.
Don't worry about it.
We know he has contact to Russians.
Never figuring out it would get out there.
The dossier that is?
Let me just throw one more out there.
I know I went a little long today.
We'll be putting in some extra content, folks.
Doesn't this Natasha Bertrand, you know, fake media person who always gets leaks from the insiders to promote propaganda and Pravda-like conspiracy theories.
Remember that, Natasha Bertrand?
Yeah.
Does this article make sense now?
In 2017, she put out, conveniently, Joe, a year after that text I just showed you for Andy McCabe, that communication from McCabe where he's talking about a Pfizer target he wants to mobilize.
Is that target Millian?
Millian, who has access to Trump, they believe?
Kushner received emails from Sergei Millian, an alleged dossier source who was in touch with George Papadopoulos.
Wow.
Wouldn't that be convenient if a year later the FBI started to get worried?
That the person they were investigating for Russian disinformation with an open CI case, Millian, they used as a source to spy on a political candidate, and they may have had a FISA warn him, knowing it was all BS from the start, and still attributed information to him anyway?
Maybe they got a little worried, one of these insiders, and had to leak to a friendly Natasha Bertrand, an activist at heart, that, well, let's dirty up Kushner because he was in contact with Millian.
That way, when this comes out later, it'll look like we were really doing something.
Devastating.
Absolutely devastating developments.
There is now no question the FBI was investigating a source, Millian.
They may have had a FISA on for Russian connections that they were then using to spy on a presidential candidate, despite the information attributed to him being all complete, utter garbage and being attributed to him with very little evidence he ever said it at all.
Amazing.
All right, folks, thanks again for tuning in.
A complicated show today, but worth your time.
YouTube.com slash Bongino.
Please subscribe to our YouTube channel.
We're like what, Paula?
15 subscribers away from 400,000?
YouTube.com slash Bongino.
We really appreciate your support of our YouTube channel.
