In this episode I address the astonishing series of media lies directed at President Trump yesterday. I also address a series of important breaks in the scheme to take down the Trump team. News Picks:Hysterical MSNBC producer claims Trump was not at Ground Zero. He must have missed the video.
Democrats have destroyed our inner cities.
This key Spygate figure is about to pull off a bold move.
We must get a hold of our national debt.
President Trump wins big at the Supreme Court.
Copyright Dan Bongino All Rights Reserved.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
All right, welcome to the Dan Bongino Show.
Producer Joe, how are you today?
That was actually countdown number two.
Let me just walk through what just happened on the air.
Joe gives me a countdown, and so does my wife.
Like, the three, two, one, go.
Hey, so Joe, can we just redo this a second?
So Joe, give me a countdown like we're doing.
Just say three, two, I'll show you what just happened.
10.33, content in three.
Two.
2...1...
Oh, are we live?
That's what just happened before.
I was totally not paying attention at all.
And I think even Paula was like, what just happened?
Did you just miss the count?
Three, two, one is typically, it's not hard to figure out.
It's pretty much a standard measure of how someone initiates whether a road race, a TV show, three, two, one.
And I was like, oh, totally blew that.
Well, Joe, producer Joe, how are you today?
You doing all right?
Yeah, I guess I'm, yes, I'm doing fine, Dan.
Everything's good.
How's little Joe doing in boot camp?
I know he gave you, sent you a letter.
Is he doing okay?
Yeah, he did.
I was like a little girl with her first note when I saw it.
Oh, my son wrote to me!
Oh boy!
He's doing good.
Producer Joe's son is in boot camp with the Marine Corps.
And I know I've been getting a lot of emails from the audience, very supportive of little Joe.
So you got to keep us updated, all right?
Thank you all.
Yeah, I will.
He really wants to be a Marine, man.
He really wants to be a Marine.
Well, he's a good kid, and Marines want guys like him too.
Hey, another special note of sincere gratitude to the audience.
I asked you to tune in to The Five on Friday on Fox.
You guys and ladies are the absolute best.
We were number one in the demo, which is huge, and the audience was enormous for a Friday on The Five.
You guys and ladies are the best.
Thank you so much.
All right, let's get right to it today.
Let me lay out where we're going to go because I've got a pretty stacked show.
I got a killer update on the Papadopoulos case that I'm going to explain.
You're not going to want to go anywhere on this.
Yeah, George Papadopoulos, key figure in the Spygate case.
I've got some unbelievably Stupid fake news.
You know, I don't just like to do stuff, but this is so easy to debunk.
It's so bad when the fake news actually publishes a story that their own video contradicts.
I'll get to that.
I got a lot more, too, including some updates on a big Trump win in the Supreme Court.
All right.
Today's show brought to you by our buddies at Quip.
Look at that.
Is that the most elegant looking toothbrush you've ever seen?
Check that out.
Elegant, yes.
Yeah, it is.
This is great.
It's like a power washing for your mouth.
We love Quip.
Listen, it has sensitive sonic vibrations for an effective clean that's gentle on your sensitive gums.
It has a two minute timer, so you know exactly how long to brush your teeth.
And it pulses every 30 seconds to even remind you when to switch sides.
Listen, up to 90% of us don't brush for a full two minutes or don't clean evenly.
It has a multi-use cover, this Quip toothbrush, which I love, which is fantastic.
Everyone in my house uses it.
It is a cover you can take with you.
Declutters your sink or cabinet.
You put it in this travel case.
You throw it right in your bag.
Look how small it is too.
This isn't like a pinto.
Some of these electric toothbrushes are like seven, eight times the size.
You're like this.
You're like bicep curling.
The chance to show off the guns.
Check it out.
That's what they do.
Remember that?
Remember that old line?
Yes, the guy in New York who lifts weights like, how do you get to the bridge?
You go that way.
This is it.
The Quip toothbrush.
We love the Quip toothbrush.
It's one of the first electric toothbrushes accepted by the American Dental Association, backed by over 25,000 dental professionals, thousands of five-star reviews.
They have a kid's brush too, which is the same as the original version, just tweaked down for kid's size mouth.
That's why I love Quip.
I'm taking it on all my trips up to New York for Fox.
Quip starts at just $25.
And if you go to getquip, that's G-E-T-Q-U-I-P, getquip.com slash Dan, getquip.com slash Dan, getquip.com slash Dan, right now, you get your first refill pack for free.
That's your first refill pack free at getquip.com slash Dan.
Best toothbrush out there.
All right, let's go.
Okay, here we go!
Fake news report!
Why is this important?
Why do I cover it on the show?
Because, ladies and gentlemen, I am a strong advocate, always will be, for a free and fair press.
We need it.
It's just a fact.
But the press is not fair.
I'm glad they're free.
I hope they remain free.
In a constitutional republic, it's the only way to rock and roll.
The press has not been fair.
They haven't been fair since the New York Times was reporting on the successes, air quotes, of the Soviet Union decades ago.
They're a joke.
So here is a commentator on Twitter who does some commentary on the media and Trump and elsewhere.
This guy's name is Aaron Rupar.
I want you to pay attention to this tweet because it's hilarious and this guy's ability to get a story completely wrong nearly every single time.
Check this tweet out.
So this is at A-T-R-U-P-A-R, at Aaron Rupar, or at A-T-Rupar, whatever.
He says that yesterday, while Trump was signing a bill in support of 9-11 first responders in the Rose Garden at the White House, he tweets, and I quote, Trump suggests he was a 9-11 first responder.
Okay, and he actually tweets a video in his tweet.
Again, this is to show you what we're dealing with, ladies and gentlemen, how liberals will lie, never retract their statements, make things up completely, and do it knowing, and I took a note on this, The essence of fake news, Joe, is that people will never read past the headlines.
Right.
I shouldn't say never, but a lot of folks will just read that tweet and say, oh my gosh, Trump at a Rose Garden ceremony for the signing of this 9-11 responder support bill.
Trump had the temerity, Joe, to suggest he was a 9-11 first responder.
Holy Moses!
Joe, that's awful, right?
Oh, that's terrible, Daniel.
That's terrible.
Terrible!
Yes.
But he, this is, this is how stupid these people are.
In the tweet, Rupar tweets this video with the headline, now keep in mind, this brief 13 second video is supposed to suggest that Trump suggested he was a 9-11 first responder.
Let's play him saying that.
Here we go.
Many of those affected were firefighters, police officers, and other first responders.
And I was down there also.
But I'm not considering myself a first responder.
But I was down there.
I spent a lot of time down there with you.
Did I?
Oh, jeez!
Joe, now, there's three of us here on the show.
It's a small crew.
Yeah.
Paul, is Amelia out there?
Amelia, come on in a second.
I have a seven-year-old daughter, and I'm wondering if she could figure that out.
Mimi, come on over.
You want to be on the show a second?
Okay.
If I were to say to you... Here, say hello.
Okay, there's my daughter, right?
There she is!
Now you're hiding behind me.
Come on in here.
If I were to say to you, Mimi, that you can't have a toy, like you can't take it, what do you think that would mean?
It's a negative, right?
If you can't have a toy, right?
Yeah, it would be.
Yes!
My daughter has figured it out.
Thank you, Amelia.
Daddy loves you.
She's figured out a negative.
If I say, you can't bring a toy, that means you can't bring the toys.
You can't have them.
Okay.
My, my seven year old daughter has figured out that there's this element of negation.
When you use a word like you cannot do this, right?
So president Trump will use it where it says, I'm not saying, I am not saying I was a nine 11 responder.
And this loser on Twitter tweets the exact opposite with no shame at all.
Folks, the point of this whole thing is the media has never ever treated this president fairly.
They make this stuff up.
My seven-year-old daughter, if you want to check her out by the youtube.com slash budgie, she's a cool cat.
We love my daughter.
I don't put her on the show often, but she's home from camps and school obviously in the summer this week, so she likes coming on.
Plus she was a little upset at me because I didn't show her picture on the five on Friday, but she wasn't born yet.
There's nothing I could do.
She wasn't actually there.
The media does this all the time.
Now, I want to show you again how this narrative now.
Again, the media strategy, Joe.
So you're aware of this before 2020.
Tweet a fake headline.
There's a refractory period afterwards, if you know what I mean, where the headline will spread before conservatives who are smarter than liberals pick up on the fact that it's a lie.
There's always a brief refractory period, right?
Right.
Sorry, I want to move this a little bit.
I just want to make sure because I don't want the sound to be bad.
Okay, there we go.
Now, in the hours that followed Ruppar's sensational lie that the president said he was the first responder, when he said the exact opposite in the video, here's what happened.
Here's a tweet by Chris Saliza and Ben White.
Saliza, who's just a known liar at CNN, and Ben White at Politico, who's another clown.
Saliza writes a piece suggesting that this is true.
He says, reminder, this happened today.
And again, he quotes Trump, and in his piece suggests that Trump is lying about being down at ground zero.
Okay.
And then Ben White from Bull Ittico, he tweets, he tweets trying to be a smart guy, throw that back up, narrator.
He wasn't, and he didn't.
So Politico and CNN are suggesting that President Trump, after the 9-11 attacks, was not in fact down at ground zero and was lying.
Hat tip, Eddie Zipper on Twitter, who did what every conservative does, research and journalism-ing, which journalists don't ever do.
Again, it's Politico and CNN and Saliza, so we don't actually expect facts from any of these people.
Matter of fact, here's another one.
Here's a tweet from a producer at MSDNC, again, tripling down on the fact that Trump said he was a first responder, but he wasn't even at ground zero.
None of which happened.
Here's Kyle Griffin at MSNBC, known clown on Twitter, who is another collusion hoaxer, by the way.
Here's him tweeting, Trump claims, without evidence, to an audience that includes 9-11 first responders.
I was down there at Ground Zero also, but I'm not considering myself a first responder.
But I was down there.
I spent a lot of time down there with you.
This is hysterical, Joe.
Yeah.
This guy works for MSDNC.
In other words, he works for NBC.
He's a producer there.
Here is video from, I believe, NBC of Trump at Ground Zero.
Now, just a few moments ago, Donald Trump passed through here.
So we had a minute to talk with him.
Let's roll that tape.
You can see what he had to say.
Well, I've never seen anything like it.
I've seen two huge 110-story buildings that are reduced to rubble.
Thousands and thousands of lives.
I just got to see something that I've never seen before.
I have hundreds of men inside working right now, and we're bringing down another 125 in a little while, and they've never done work like this before.
And they're hard-working people, but they've never seen anything like it, and they've never done work like this before.
It's terrible.
Alrighty then.
I mean, do you understand, ladies and gentlemen, not all.
I don't want to stereotype a broad swath of an industry, including media folks, because I know some good people out there who are genuinely interested in the truth.
My experience, however, with the media, and I would be lying to you if I said otherwise, I'm not going to do that.
That includes my time in my prior line of work as well, when you're the press agent and you deal with these people.
I'm not kidding, is that they are generally below average intelligence.
The ones, many of them that I've met, are below average intelligence, don't understand 99% of the topics they talk about, And will lie at will only to negatively impact Republicans, Libertarians, and Conservatives.
How does a producer at NBC tweet out that without evidence Trump said he was at ground zero when there's an interview with NBC in his own archive that a conservative, Eddie Zipporah, who doesn't even work at NBC, found in a jiffy?
How do you explain that?
The answer is it's not explainable.
It's only explainable by the overwhelming negative emotions these people have towards Republicans and Trump in general, which clouds their basic journalistic judgment.
They're not serious people!
So let's walk through what happens.
Tweet out a fake headline despite all contradictory evidence.
When the evidence comes back and kicks you right in the cojones, right?
Double down on it, have Chris Saliza write an op-ed, have Kyle Griffin from NBC tweet it, and then when it's thoroughly, completely debunked and refuted in overwhelming fashion, right?
Then days later, tweets some kind of like, which they won't even do, oh yeah, maybe he was down there, but like this guy Ben White did from Politico, who was tweeting back then, oh, well, he was down there, but it was just a PR thing.
This is what they do.
Joe, goalposts, goalposts, goalposts.
Oh, goalposts off the screen.
So Ben White, Politico clown, joker, fake pseudo journalist, right?
Trump wasn't down there.
He wasn't.
Video, Trump down there.
Okay, he was down there, but it was just PR.
And then he says he's bringing down some workers to help out.
Okay, it was just PR and he was just helping because he had a project he wanted them to work on and he thought it'd be good for his business.
What are you talking about?
Jeez.
He's... It's... Joe, it's pathetic.
It's so pathetic.
Nothing... I get nothing... I get so much joy out of having been on the right side of all of this.
On Spygate, on media malfeasance, on the constant anti-Trump heresy from these people.
They just make stuff up.
They make up these anti-Trump stories.
Listen, not everyone.
Some of the stuff that they tweet out about Trump.
Listen, nobody's a saint.
Nobody's a sinner on this planet, especially in politics.
But the overwhelming majority of stories are fake.
They are hoping for the refractory period there, where they get a little downtime, where the fake narrative will spread.
It's really pathetic.
Alright, let's move on.
Speaking of fake narratives, here is Democratic Representative, forgive me if I'm saying her name wrong, it's not intentional, Pramila Jayapal.
Again, I'm not, if I'm saying that wrong, my apologies.
Democratic Rep Pramila Jayapal.
Here is her on MSNBC, Representative Jayapal.
Talking again.
Again, we're speaking about debunked nonsense talking points that spread through the media despite any evidence that were true.
First, Trump said he was a first responder.
He wasn't.
Secondly, Trump said he wasn't at ground zero.
He was.
This one.
They're going back, shockingly, shockingly, to an old narrative, Joe, that the immigration crisis at the border is exploding.
And I got an update on that, too, so stay tuned.
Don't go anywhere.
Trump had a big win in the Supreme Court.
We missed it yesterday because we were so busy with Baltimore stories.
Here's Rep Jayapal doubling down on the manufactured crisis line.
Another fake media narrative that is not a crisis.
But secondly, I want you to pay special attention in this shortcut here.
What she says about how to mitigate illegal drugs crossing our southern border.
You may catch it, but it's so dumb that it... Yeah, just play it.
I'll cover it afterwards.
It's funny.
We have to stop the ability of the president to transfer authority between these departments which has long existed in order to help presidents if they do have to respond to urgent crises that are legitimate.
But in this case that is not what it is.
So we're going to have to go back and use the appropriations process to stop this transfer authority and then to start cutting if The president and the administration continues to go outside of their bounds and deny the authority of Congress.
At the end of the day, what disappoints me about this is the president manufactured this crisis along the border.
But if you listen to his rhetoric, it is supposedly about the surge of immigrants coming across the border.
It is not about, you know, drug smuggling and all these other violent crimes that are happening.
They try to make it about that, but that's not the reality.
If that was really what they were worried about, They should be investing in more dogs to sniff out drugs, more technology that actually identifies where drugs are hidden.
Most of the drugs that come over the border, they're hidden in different places.
Some of the border patrol stations have that technology, others do not.
There's lots of effective things to do to fight drug smuggling on the southern border.
[laughter]
I don't even know where to start.
I know this is one of those...
Okay, where do we start on that one?
Number one, it's almost comical that they're going back to the manufactured crisis line.
So again, let's go back to the fake narrative, wait for refractory period, maybe apologize a bit, and then double down later when everybody forgets again you made up the original narrative.
I mean, this is outstanding.
This is outstanding and the gall it takes to go back to a narrative so repeatedly debunked by sane people everywhere.
There is obviously a crisis at the border.
Immigration, illegal immigration is up dramatically.
Asylum claims are up dramatically.
Children showing up at the border with people claiming to be their parents.
Up to a third of them are not their parents.
They're being trafficked.
We have detention facilities overflowing.
They are now back again to us crazy conservatives are making this all up.
Now, why?
What happened?
I want to get to the dogs thing in a minute too because it shows you the absolute cluelessness of the broken political class in DC that seriously need to go out and do ride-alongs with law enforcement because what they say is so dumb it strains credulity that they would even say it on a national television show.
But going back, why is this all happening, right?
The Wall Street Journal published a piece yesterday about Trump's big victory in the Supreme Court.
The bottom line is this.
Trump had reallocated some Pentagon money, defense money, to the southern border.
It was about $2.5 billion.
Title of the piece is, The Judicial Injunction Dysfunction.
There are two takeaways from this piece.
Of course, there was a lawsuit filed.
On behalf of a group, the group filed a lawsuit, said, listen, you can't spend this money.
It wasn't allocated for this.
The Supreme Court stopped the stay, meaning the construction can go forward.
Simple as that.
Trump wins, portions of the wall, 100 miles plus will be built.
More will be refurbished with that $2.5 billion.
Ladies and gentlemen, the victory is as simple as that.
What's important and an important takeaway with the Democrats and Rep.
Jayapal, what they're freaking out about is Clarence Thomas, in the opinion, has been just very effective in attacking these national injunctions.
What does that mean and why are the Democrats worried?
So first, they're worried, obviously, because more walls are going to be built with Trump's money, and he's going to be able to fulfill a campaign promise.
They're terrified about that.
Right.
But secondly, Joe, liberals have loved national injunctions for eons.
What are national injunctions?
Why do liberals love them?
A national injunction is when a local district court federal judge who's responsible for one district, one area of the country, Maryland, Eastern District of New York, whatever it may be, Southern District of New York, he is responsible for a local case, issues an injunction nationally.
Meaning nothing can happen anywhere, even outside his district.
They have used national injunctions.
I took a note on this, forgive me folks, because it's in yesterday's notes in the famous Dan Bongino, or infamous, book here.
Where is the national injunction part?
Oh, here we go.
Always weird to me, yeah.
Yeah, so this is actually from the Wall Street Journal piece.
They have issued 39 national injunctions, these judges posing as judges who are really politicians, federal judges, 39 national injunctions against the Trump administration.
Now you may say, well that number I need it in context, right?
Okay, fair enough.
How many national injunctions were issued against the Obama administration in their first two years?
Two!
Two.
The deuce.
Now, from the Wall Street Journal piece, here's Clarence Thomas.
Clarence Thomas has spoken out strongly against this.
He said, the Supreme Court said Friday the Trump administration could proceed to reallocate some $2.5 billion.
This is from the piece.
Had earmarked for the Pentagon to build a wall.
We disagree with the policy, but the good news is that the high court is finally sending a message about the proliferation of national injunctions by lower court judges.
Thomas filleted them.
Basically saying this has to stop.
You have a decision, Joe, in the Eastern District of New York and you're a district judge, that's where it applies.
It is not a national decision to stop the President of the United States.
Joe, that effectively gives district court judges power to rule over the entire country.
Right.
Remember the travel ban?
All of this, these were all national injunctions.
Yeah.
It has to stop.
The Democrats are panicking now because if national injunctions are stopped, they won't be able to stop national policy.
It'll only apply in that federal district, and they're terrified.
That's why they're freaking out.
That's why you see Representative Jayapal going back to the debunked, discredited talking point that there's not a crisis on the southern border.
But the second point she makes is equally ridiculous.
Well, we just need to invest in more dogs.
Okay, great.
At checkpoints, that's fine.
That's a great idea.
But does she realize that illegal drugs are not only being trafficked at ports of entry, Joe?
Does she understand that people who traffic in children and illegal immigrants across the border also traffic in drugs and counterfeit money between ports of entry?
What are you gonna do?
Have the dogs patrolling the southern border between ports of entry sniffing people you don't know about?
If they're in the country illegally, that means they entered illegally.
Port of entry A, port of entry B, illegal entry right down the middle.
Illegal entry, holding 10 yards.
Folks, they're entering between ports of entry.
How are you going to have dogs sniffing people who you don't know are here and enter the country illegally?
I mean, do they think this stuff through?
Trump administration trying to make this about illegal drugs.
It is about illegal drugs.
That's the exact point the Trump administration has been making.
We can fortify ports of entry.
Fine.
We all agree.
But suggesting that the Trump administration is lying and trying to make this about illegal drugs, and if we just had more dogs, we'd find them all.
You're missing the point completely.
We don't find them all, the drugs, because we can't find the people.
And either can the dogs.
These dogs are not Karnak from the Johnny Carson show.
Putting a piece of paper to the... There's a reason we can't find these people because they're between ports of entry.
Oh my gosh, is this hard to figure out?
These are juvenile conversations I regret even having to have on the show.
In other words, they're unknown unknowns.
We don't know about the drugs because we don't know about the people.
That's how they got here illegally.
Go sniff those people.
What people?
The people that aren't there anymore and snuck in the country.
Okay!
Well, we just need dogs we don't know about, you know?
Phantom dogs!
We need phantom dogs, right?
To coach the real dogs to catching the people we didn't know about either.
Good point.
Well said.
Excellent.
This is so crazy.
That's going to solve it.
More dogs.
Roving packs of Belgian Malinois and shepherds across the southern border.
Sniffing people we don't know about.
Well done, Representative Jayapal.
Excellent point there.
You really nailed it.
Oh my gosh.
All right, moving on.
Our second sponsor today, our friends at Policy Genius.
Ladies and gentlemen, part of adulthood is having to do things you really don't want to do.
Red-eye flights, working late, visiting the in-laws, getting life insurance.
But another part of adulthood is learning to delegate what you can't stand.
And while you can't delegate a visit to the in-laws, you can definitely delegate life insurance shopping.
You want to make it easy?
Use what we use.
Policygenius.com.
Compare quotes in just two minutes.
The dose.
Two minutes.
PolicyGenius is the easy way to shop for life insurance online.
In just two minutes, you can compare quotes from top insurers and find your best price.
You want to shop around all day or you want to spend two minutes?
Go to PolicyGenius.com.
Once you apply, the PolicyGenius team will handle all the paperwork and red tape.
There's no sales pressure.
It's not going to be any hidden fees, just financial protection and peace of mind.
How much would you pay for that?
And PolicyGenius doesn't make life insurance easy only.
It makes home insurance easy, auto insurance, and disability insurance too.
It's not just about life insurance.
They can help you with the home, auto, and disability insurance as well.
So if you need life insurance, but you just don't want to deal with all the legwork, red tape, and nonsense, head to PolicyGenius.com, the easy way to compare all the top insurers and find the best value for you.
PolicyGenius.com.
Delegate what you hate, especially if you hate getting life insurance.
Go check them out.
Okay, uh, moving on.
Yeah, it's, it's, you know, I mean, really, we didn't, Joe and I have fun with the show, but it's a serious show.
We've always tried to present facts and data and things like that.
But it's, it's, it's just sad that this is this constantly, it's just so easy to discredit these people and the nonsense they spew all the time.
Um, you know, sometimes you got to laugh while doing it and, you know, forgive me for some of you don't like me, but it's doing that the funniest, but I just can't help it.
What are you going to do?
Let's have the dog sniff him.
Sniff who?
The people we didn't catch?
Yes, those people.
Yeah, but we didn't catch them.
Oh yeah, well, we have roving packs of shepherds.
We used to call them cattle.
When I was the precinct in the 7-5.
Because these dogs in the 7-5 precinct in Eastern New York, do you ever see this show?
You've probably seen it while driving through Baltimore too.
There were a lot of stray dogs on the street.
Oh yeah.
And they wind up roaming in packs.
Yeah.
So we used to call them the cattle.
Be like, there's a pack of cattle right there!
There'd be like 20 dogs and there's always like a guy, a dog in the front with a little swagger, like the whole bunch of them.
Yeah, let those dogs just patrol everywhere for people we can't find.
So stupid.
Okay, all right, let me move on.
So, uh, Geraldo, who I debate a lot on Fox, a co-worker of mine, you know, we have a good time in our debates, get a little heated back.
We tweeted something this morning I really have a hard time with, I want to put out there.
Maybe we'll, hopefully, maybe tonight on Hannity, I do my appearance on Tuesday night, maybe we get to debate Geraldo and I over this tweet, but I strongly object to this tweet.
So Geraldo tweeted out this morning, and I tweeted back to him, because I'm very offended by this, He said, and he's at Geraldo Rivera's blue checkmark account if you want to check it out, we would all be better off if in discussing race relations, Donald Trump emphasized the positives like his support for economic opportunity zones and criminal justice reform to battle mass incarceration.
Okay, fine.
But then he goes on to say, this is strange.
It's just weird to squabble with so many of people of color at the same time.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm sorry, I don't get this.
I've seen this repeatedly surface, whether it's Geraldo or others, suggesting somehow that the melanin content of your skin, when you're a political leader responsible for sensible solutions and a path forward to people's problems, that's what they elect you to do.
And those solutions don't have to be government bills.
They can be getting rid of bad government bills.
Yeah.
But you're elected to solve problems.
That's what you're elected to do!
So I don't get what Geraldo's point is, if you're Hispanic or Black or Asian or whatever it is, that somehow I took the show that you're immune from criticism?
I mean, listen, I'm not accusing Geraldo of being racist, obviously, but isn't that kind of condescending?
What are you suggesting?
I don't understand, and I hope I get the opportunity tonight to address this.
Are you suggesting somehow that if a lawmaker is black or hispanic, that what, they're incapable of handling criticism?
Despite disastrous results?
Look at this Washington Times piece.
This is up in the show notes today.
Please check out the show notes.
Bongino.com.
You subscribe to my email list.
I'll send these articles right to you.
It's very good.
The Washington Times, Trump's quotes here, racist tweets are a reminder, and that's in quotes, they don't really mean that.
A reminder, most troubled U.S.
cities are run by the Democrats, by Valerie Richardson, Washington Times, July 29th, 2019.
This is in the show notes, I encourage you to check it out.
Ladies and gentlemen, most of America's failing inner cities that happen to have large minority black and Hispanic populations are run by Democrats and have been for decades.
That's a fact!
A fact!
F-A-C-T!
A fact!
Spell it out for the liberals!
Whether that bothers you or not is of no concern to me.
Whether the leaders of those cities are black or white, you add Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, who was black, You had Martin O'Malley in Baltimore who was white is entirely irrelevant.
The fact that they have failed the citizens of these inner cities by imposing an increasingly liberal agenda there is what concerns me.
These politicians and the political class are not immune from criticism.
Elijah Cummings, you know, I heard somebody say yesterday he's a nice guy.
Great!
You know, my dad's a nice guy too.
You know, I love my dad.
He's a great guy.
It doesn't mean, you know, I'd vote for him.
I may, I may not.
I don't know.
He hasn't, you know, he hasn't discussed running.
He's a nice guy.
It doesn't really matter.
Ladies and gentlemen, it is entirely unfair to not focus on these problems.
Now, yesterday, by the way, thank you for your support.
Yesterday's show, Joe and I were discussing before we went on the air, we just did bonkers numbers.
You guys are sending us into the stratosphere and it's up to you.
But yesterday's show, I went on for about 15, 20 minutes about the failures in Baltimore and how intimately familiar I am with it, because I ran there.
I remember, you know, I lived right outside of Baltimore.
It's not that I'm unfamiliar with here.
Joe's worked there literally for decades.
In the county, but right outside.
Joe, nobody knows Baltimore like Joe, trust me.
He's been listening to calls on talk radio there for 20 plus years.
Yeah, man.
About the problems in Baltimore.
Joe, has any of it changed, by the way?
It's probably gotten worse, Dan.
Folks, he lives there.
He's in Arnold now.
He's like 10 miles out of Baltimore.
I'm telling you, Joe worked there forever.
He's not joking.
It has probably gotten worse.
He's right.
Just drive down any street, Biddle, make any turn off Pratt out of the Inner Harbor.
Make any left turn off Pratt Street and go north.
Any!
It doesn't matter.
You get two blocks away and you're like, what happened here?
And what, because Elijah Cummings happens to be black?
We're not supposed to criticize him?
No, no, I'm sorry.
I don't accept that and I never will.
And you call me whatever you want.
I'm interested in fixing it.
You can get involved in all the racial identity stuff all you want.
I'm not interested.
No dice, no thanks.
Showing you how bad it is, by the way, and forgive me, but I'm going to need Joe to narrate this a little bit because our audio audience always comes first.
This is an actual cut, by the way, of Fox 45 in Baltimore, the local news station.
They're running a piece on Trump's comments about Baltimore, and there's some B-roll or whatever, live video, whatever it is now.
It wasn't B-roll.
It's live video running in the background.
Now, I'm going to play the cut.
The audio's you can hear, but the audio listeners, you'll be able to hear what the news person is saying, the anchor's saying.
But you're not going to be able to see the visual, but it's okay because Joe is going to narrate it.
So let's play the video.
And Joe, help us out when you can a little bit about what's going on.
Paula, play that cut.
Waiting for the next ratter to come up to the plate.
Ah, there he is.
Radder's behind the plate.
He's taking off for first, Dan.
He's stalled.
There he goes!
There he goes, Dan!
He's making a turn to second.
Oh!
Second base!
Third and he's home, Dan!
Look at that rodent run, baby!
Okay.
You ever see, you ever hear that song by Meat Loafers?
Ah, yeah.
Paradise by the Dashboard Lights?
That was a great poem.
Folks, it doesn't matter what the lady was saying.
It's a piece about Trump's tweets.
The anchor's talking and there's a rat in the background!
YouTube.com slash Bongino if you want to see it.
There's Joe narrating it like, it ain't round first base.
Heading towards second half.
He's speeding up towards third.
He's going for the play.
He is headed off.
And a slide and he's in.
And the rat like turns the corner at the end.
Did you see the rat do the U-turn?
The rat comes out.
This is on a report about Trump's tweets.
There is literally Not figuratively.
Paula said to me before the show, did you see how big that thing was?
It looks like a mutant cat from the X-Men series.
Like a cyclops cat that can beam lasers out of its eyes.
That's how big this rat is.
Folks, look at that sucker.
It's the size of a whole brick.
Look at it in context of the brick.
It looks like Baby and Linda, the two dogs we've adopted from my mother-in-law.
And Baby and Linda are morkies.
They're like this big.
It's a Ruthian rat.
The rat's teeth are, oh my god, they're like upside down tombstones, this rat's teeth.
Oh, dude!
This is in a live report about Trump tweeting about Baltimore's rat problem and elsewhere.
A rat runs across the scene and he's around the second.
And then the rat, like, I think the rat realizes he's going to become part of a political story.
He ducks behind a corner real quick like, hey, listen, I don't want to get involved in this Trump stuff.
I'm out of here too.
Folks, this is really happening.
This is really happening in the real world.
All right.
Now, it's only fair for me, and I'm going to cover this quickly, but I did break down the problems in Baltimore yesterday, but I always like to present to you solutions.
And I had said to you that I have been a beneficiary of some of these very solutions myself and it's the only reason I'm here.
Kind of a de facto school choice.
It wasn't a school choice program in New York at the time but I was able to get out and go to a Catholic school and get away from awful public schools in New York.
Ladies and gentlemen we could fix Baltimore and if I may humbly ask that the president and his staff, some who may listen and Please, consider this.
Consider a three-fold agenda where you go out and give a presser in Baltimore, let people yell and scream all they want, these politicians.
Go give a presser in Baltimore and make it, it'll make the local news, no question about it, it'll make national news, but it'll make the local news and force them to talk about things that make them uncomfortable.
Propose a three-part solution.
Number one, a citywide school choice initiative.
You want to be bold?
You want to be bold?
Go there with some cojones and propose a citywide school choice initiative.
Any Baltimore city parent will be able to pick any city in Baltimore which will be subsidized with the taxpayer dollars the taxpayers pay.
They're paying their money for the school.
They can go to any school they want.
You will get a freedom voucher to go wherever you'd like to go.
Be bold!
The teachers' unions, of course, will melt down.
Liberal politicians who have been bribed by these teachers' unions forever, they'll go crazy.
Go into Baltimore and give that speech.
Your kids in a failing school in Baltimore?
Entirely unacceptable.
I am here as the President of the United States.
Although I'm not a monarch, there's nothing I can do to change the city politics.
I'm a federal representative.
I am suggesting a plan right now for a citywide school choice initiative and in every city across the country.
Give that speech in Baltimore, right in the heart of the city.
Go right down there.
Second, Propose a massive set of deregulations, get rid of the Baltimore City red tape, and propose a series of tax cuts that benefit the city of Baltimore.
Frame it as letting the people spending their own money, because that's what it is.
You will now have more in-pocket, take-home money in your own pay because of what we're doing here in Baltimore.
We're gonna propose Baltimore City match these Opportunity Zone type tax cuts.
And listen, I'm not a huge fan, I gotta be honest with you, of Opportunity Zones for a number of reasons, but put them on the spot!
Say, we'll try to match in some federal tax initiative, cut for cut, whatever Baltimore City can do, and we will try to get our federal regulations out of the way if you'll match them as well.
They'll freak out, folks.
They'll freak out.
Yeah.
Finally, number three, Propose a public safety initiative.
Here's where the president can get involved.
There's a Secret Service office in Baltimore on Pratt Street.
How do I know that?
I work there.
There's an FBI office right there, too.
There's a federal courthouse in Baltimore on Pratt Street.
There's DEA.
Tell the president, the president should give that speech.
Number three, I'm proposing a public safety initiative.
We're going to flood the zone with some federal agents.
I'm going to ask Baltimore City to match that.
With a task force representative from Baltimore City Police.
I'm even going to ask Baltimore County to get involved too, surrounding areas.
We're going to do a gun task force, a drug task force.
We're going to bump up the numbers.
And I want to see an initiative right now to clean up this city.
Watch them all freak out.
Oh my gosh, the president's proposing actual solutions.
Mr. President, listen, you're going to go there.
You are going to get some hecklers.
You are going to get some screamers in the media.
You are going to get some screamer politicians trying to get their two minutes on TV.
Forget it for a second, the optics of it.
It is sound bites and snapshots.
But in the end, you will be able to walk away and say, I did what I could do.
On the other end, all they did was scream, those politicians.
And the residents of Baltimore, who deserve better by the way, will notice that you were there.
Give it a shot.
It's worth it.
Let me give you one last statistic before I move on.
I've got this Papadopoulos story, which is very, very, very important.
It's ironic that people like Ilhan Omar and other liberal Democrat congressmen and women have been complaining about the president's third-party asylum decision.
The president wants asylum seekers, Joe, to seek asylum in the first country they enter.
So if you're leaving Guatemala, you enter Mexico to get to the United States.
Third-party agreements mean you'll have to declare for asylum in Mexico, not the United States.
That's where you got first.
Asylum meaning you fear some kind of prosecution for your political beliefs, torture, or death.
Then you should be able to escape your country, but that doesn't mean you get to go to the United States.
It's the first country you land in.
Ilhan Omar tweeted out forcing people from Guatemala to declare for asylum in Guatemala, or people from Honduras or others to declare in Guatemala.
To be precise about it.
That's unfair.
Guatemala is a dangerous place.
Joe, what's the homicide rate in Guatemala?
22 per 100,000 people.
What's the homicide rate in Baltimore?
56 per 100,000 people.
Hmm.
Kind of lost that argument a long time ago.
But again, don't expect Ilhan Omar and him to deal with facts, because that's not exactly what they do.
They deal in narratives.
All right, moving on.
This is an important story about Papadopoulos.
Let me get to this first.
Our last sponsor of the day.
And the RINOs are coming out, folks, against Ratcliffe, who's going to be, hopefully, our next director of national intelligence.
The RINOs are already barking.
I want to get to that, too.
You did, right?
Today's show brought to you by Bravo Company.
Bravo for Bravo Company.
We love them.
BravoCompanyMFG.com.
That's where you want to go if you're looking for the finest rifles and pistols in the market.
Ladies and gentlemen, let me caution you though.
If you're looking for a sporting arms company, BravoCompanyMFG.com, they're not your place.
They make life-saving equipment here, designed to life-saving standards and treated with that type of attention when they produce the finest rifles and pistols on the market.
I have two of these.
When I pick them up, I tell this story all the time because it's true.
The FFL, the licensed firearm dealer I picked him up from, could not extol the wonderful virtues of this precision equipment more.
He loved them.
He said, you're very lucky to get these.
BravoCompanyMFG.com.
Listen, I love learning about our rights for America.
You know I'm a Second Amendment supporter.
Owning a rifle is an awesome responsibility, and building rifles is no different.
Bravo Company was started in a garage by a Marine veteran more than two decades ago.
Bravo Company Manufacturing, it's bravocompanymfg.com, builds a professional-grade product built to combat standards.
This is because BCM believes the same level of protection should be provided to every American, regardless if they are a private citizen or a professional.
Again, they manufacture life-saving equipment here.
This is not a sporting arms company.
BCM assumes that when a rifle leaves their shop, it will be used in a life-or-death situation by a responsible citizen, law enforcement officer, or a soldier overseas.
So quality.
Quality comes first then.
Every component of a BCM rifle, every component, is hand-assembled.
and tested by Americans in Heartland, Wisconsin, to a life-saving standard.
Bravo.
Thanks for the shirts, by the way.
To learn more about Bravo Company Manufacturing, head on over to BravoCompanyMFG.com.
BravoCompanyMFG.com.
BravoCompanyMFG.com.
You can discover more about their products, special offers, and upcoming news.
Need more convincing?
Check out their YouTube channel at YouTube.com slash Bravo Company USA.
All right, we love Bravo.
So, ladies and gentlemen, Papadopoulos, George Papadopoulos, has been tweeting a lot.
George is a friend.
He's been a central figure in both of my books, Spygate and my follow-up to it, Exonerated.
Papadopoulos, you can see this article at bungino.com.
George is now saying he's headed to Greece to receive, to retrieve, quote, the entrapment money.
Ladies and gentlemen, what's going on here?
Why is it important?
Why does it matter to you?
As you can tell from my George Papadopoulos interview, if you listen to it, which we did seven, eight months ago, a year ago.
I'm always terrible with time, of course.
But we interviewed George on the show.
It's one of the few interviews we've ever done.
It was illuminating, to say the least.
It was about an hour-long interview.
And George Papadopoulos, who was a Trump team member, for those of you who've forgotten, was a member of the Trump team.
As he admits, he was a low-level advisor.
He was not like the campaign manager, but that's okay.
George was a member of the Trump team, Maltese academic approached him by the name of Joseph Massoud, claimed to have Russian dirt on Hillary.
That story's been changed a few times.
And the FBI alleges Papadopoulos told this to another diplomat, therefore George is some kind of intermediary in an exchange of information between the Russians and the Trump team.
A nonsense story.
Ladies and gentlemen, I believe and have always believed George Papadopoulos was entrapped by Western intelligence assets working in conjunction with Democrats and the Obama administration to set up the Trump team to advance the collusion narrative.
But one of the mysteries of this case, and I'm going to give you multiple scenarios, one of the great mysteries of this case, which very few people have been able to pin down, ladies and gentlemen, is an incident that happens in Israel between George Papadopoulos and a guy named Charles Tawil, T-A-W-I-L, which I cover in the Bongino.com piece there.
What happened in Israel is telling.
According to Papadopoulos' story, and you can listen to our interview back then, he tells it in pretty good detail.
is a businessman who approaches Papadopoulos.
This is, again, Papadopoulos' version of events.
Tewheel disputes this, to be fair to Tewheel.
Tewheel says Papadopoulos approached him, but I'm giving you George's version because that's the interview I conducted.
All right.
Tewheel, Papadopoulos says Tewheel approached him with this $10,000 for a business deal, some kind of consulting contract.
That this $10,000 was given to him.
Papadopoulos suggests he was a little scared of this deal.
They were in a hotel room.
It was a pressure tactic.
Papadopoulos senses something's up with this $10,000, flies to Greece, leaves the money in Greece, the $10,000, and then flies back to the United States, flies back to the United States, and is promptly arrested by Bob Mueller's team and the FBI.
There are multiple theories, ladies and gentlemen, about what this Tawil interaction was.
Let me give you mine first.
What I believe may have happened.
Tawil passes this $10,000 to Papadopoulos.
Ladies and gentlemen, $10,000, conveniently, is the guideline for the amount of money you'd have to declare on a CTR in a bank.
You'd also have to declare that amount, obviously, upon re-entering the United States.
CTR is a Currency Transaction Report.
Joe, if you go to the bank and deposit $9,000, the bank doesn't have to fill that out.
Right.
If you deposit $10,001, the bank has to fill out a CTR.
In the Secret Service, we used to get these CTRs because it can, especially if people keep depositing $9,999, that can indicate what?
Structuring can indicate somebody's selling drugs, they don't want reports filed, so they're conveniently, Joe, depositing in the bank just under the amount where the bank has to report it.
You get it?
Does that make sense?
Sure does.
Then you get another report called the SAR, a suspicious activity report, which the bank can fill out regardless of a CTR saying, hey, there's something going on.
This guy's depositing $9,000 repeatedly instead of just, say, $81,000 once.
repeatedly instead of just say $81,000 once he's depositing $9,000 nine times.
We would get a SAR and they would say it would be a box check and say structuring and we
would go and check it out in the Secret Service.
That's what I did when I was on a financial crimes task force.
Conveniently, Papadopoulos is given just the amount to trigger a reporting guideline on his trip back into the United States.
Papadopoulos thinks the FBI, when they arrest him at Dulles, when he enters the United States back from this Israel-Greece trip, he thinks they were looking for the money.
Ladies and gentlemen, I do too.
Awfully convenient, they arrest them at the airport on a probable cause arrest, which rarely happens.
A probable cause arrest is an arrest without a warrant.
Now, that happens in the federal government with border patrol, uniformed services, but very rarely with 1811 federal agents.
They're called GS-1811s, the guys who wear the suits.
Very rarely.
That PC arrest at the airport probably happened because they probably had pre-prepared a warrant Thinking Papadopoulos was going to come back into the country with the $10,000.
Papadopoulos doesn't have it and then they're like, oh, now they got to arrest them on something else because they can't arrest them on this $10,000 charge failing to declare whatever it may be.
Because why, Joe?
He didn't have it!
Right.
So they arrest him at the airport on a PC warrant for lying to the FBI, which has always, always been strange to me.
I think the federal agents that listen to the show, you can agree, that is very, very unusual to make a warrantless arrest as a GS-1811 federal agent.
Very rare.
I believe they panicked.
The ongoing question, again, I'll give you my theory, forgive me, but I want to explain that because this is important.
Is, was Papadopoulos set up?
I believe Tawil, giving him this $10,000 may have been an unwitting.
Meaning, Tawil may have been involved in this, but may not have known his own involvement.
In other words, I believe this was part of an entrapment scheme.
You track him, that this $10,000 was given to catch Papadopoulos at the airport as either a way to charge him with some lobbying, FARA-related charges.
Was it 951?
And some of these lobbying for foreign governments charges.
You know, he's given this money in a foreign country by someone else, and I believe it was a way to nail him.
But just to be clear on this...
I think Tawil may have been unwitting, meaning someone, Joe, may have pushed Tawil into this business deal, but Tawil didn't know it was an intel op.
Do you get what I'm saying?
Yeah.
If I say to you, Joe, Joe, give this guy $10,000.
Well, what's it for, Dan?
Oh, Joe, it's for a business deal.
And I don't give him the wink and a nod.
Tawil may have been part of the operation and may not have known himself.
It's a possibility.
But to be fair to Tawil, there are alternate explanations here that a lot of people involved in this case have put forth.
And I want to give them to you.
So the first is that this was a Western intel setup that Tawil was a part of.
In other words, some friendly intel agency, when I say friendly, I mean friendly to the Obama administration, approaches Tawil and says, hey, wink it or not, give Papadopoulos his $10,000, tell him it's for a business deal, and if he doesn't declare it back in the United States, we're going to arrest him.
You get what I'm saying?
Yeah.
Western intel up Tawil's a part of it.
That's one theory.
I'm not sure about that.
Again, Tawil disputes that.
To be fair to Tawil, he says Papadopoulos approached him about the money.
The second, was this some form of foreign government blackmailing Papadopoulos?
This is... Let me get this one right.
And Joe, again, ombudsman, put on your ombudsman cap.
This is important.
Yeah, go ahead.
Theory number two out there, which has been floated, Is that someone was looking to blackmail Papadopoulos, not as a setup for the Obama team, Hillary or anyone else, but was looking to blackmail him potentially later on because he was a member of the Trump team to be able to use that later.
To flip him into an intel source.
You got it?
Yeah.
In other words, hey, Joe, give Papadopoulos his $10,000.
I'm a representative of foreign government.
You do it.
All of a sudden, the foreign government approaches George.
George, we got you on tape taking this money.
You're going to work for us now and report on the Trump team.
You dig?
Yeah, man.
I don't buy that one.
There have been various theories floated out there that this is how, I don't buy it at all.
But again, some people have done a lot of homework on this case, believe it.
So first, it was a Western intel setup.
Second, a foreign government was looking to blackmail Papadopoulos to develop him as a source.
The third possible scenario, which Tawil supports, again, he disputes all this, is that Tawil is completely innocent.
And this was a legitimate, or Tawil thought it was, a legitimate business deal?
Mm-hmm.
Could be.
Could be, fair.
I mean, listen, I'm not going to conclusively... Everybody's innocent until proven guilty.
I'm not going to nail anybody to the wall until there's conclusive evidence.
I find it unlikely, given the circumstances, but it's certainly a possibility.
Tawil is entirely innocent, and he thought this was a legitimate business deal, and so did Papadopoulos.
Fair enough.
The next one I already explained, which is a theory I've been clinging to for a while, that Tawil may have been an unwitting participant in a Western Intel-friendly op to set up Papadopoulos, seems likely to me.
And of course, the next theory is this is all about Farah and the reporting guidelines.
That they thought he wouldn't report the money, they were going to have some kind of money laundering charge, and some charge against him for lobbying for a government.
Ladies and gentlemen, why is this story important?
What's the update?
Well, Papadopoulos is going back now, as he says, to Greece to get the money.
He believes the bills are marked.
I explained this in another show, but I'm going to explain it again because this is important because this is making the rounds around Twitter and it's been an important story.
We don't really mark bills anymore, mark them with like specific marks or anything like that.
What they'll do with a bill if you want to trace the transaction, so if I'm running say an undercover counterfeit op and I'm giving you, Joe, the counterfeit, a real US currency for fake counterfeit, before I go and exchange that 10 $100 bills.
I will put on an inventory list the serial numbers of those bills which are unique.
Why?
Why would I do that?
So when we arrest Joe later for selling us counterfeit, we can conclusively prove that Joe sold us the counterfeit because Joe has in his possession those 10 unique $100 bills.
That serial number is not repeated anywhere.
It's like a fingerprint.
There's not really specific markings, and forgive me, I'm not trying to talk down to you or anything, I mean that.
It's just, liberals will pick out any little thing to discredit someone, marked.
What, Papadopoulos, what an idiot, they don't actually mark the bills.
That's not what he's saying, you dopes.
What he's saying is the bills, the serial numbers, have been taken down.
That he believes that.
In other words, Joe, if this was a Western intel op, and our government, or a foreign government, had some role in it, they probably, if they gave the money to Tawil to set him up, probably marked down the serial numbers on the bills, and it would probably be a good idea, hat tip to George, to go get the bills to find out what those serial numbers are.
Right, right.
It may turn out to be nothing, But it's a good move for Papadopoulos.
It's got a lot of liberals freaking out right now.
Because if those bills were marked and are down on some inventory sheet somewhere, God forbid those serial numbers, Joe, show up at the Central Intelligence Agency or elsewhere.
That would be kind of a big deal.
Or a BFD, as Joe Biden said.
Very convenient.
Gosh, look at that, on an inventory list, the same bills!
Aw, shucks!
Speaking of which, last story of the day, and we can rock and roll here.
John Ratcliffe, Congressman John Ratcliffe, great guy, appears to be going to be nominated by Trump to be the Director of National Intelligence.
This guy's been all over Spygate.
He's done a great job.
He's a solid conservative.
Ladies and gentlemen, the RINOs are freaking out.
Here's a story from Time Magazine, time.com.
Top GOP senator warned the White House about Trump's choice for DNI by John Walcott at Time.
Who is the senator?
Of course, the worst RINO now in the Senate ever since we lost Corker and these other ones.
Richard Burr on the Senate Intel Committee.
Ladies and gentlemen, what's going on here?
Burr apparently warned Trump.
Burr is allegedly a Republican.
He's not.
He's a senator from North Carolina.
Ladies and gentlemen, of course, we always do these things.
The right way, unlike liberals.
We're not Antifa.
But I respectfully request, if you're in North Carolina, you email, call the office, and let him know that you strongly object to his objections over Ratcliffe.
You know, what's going on with Burr?
What's the behind the scenes?
Burr is on the Senate Intel Committee.
Burr is a rhino.
Burr has done everything he can to destroy any progress in this investigation for a long time now.
Richard Burr is on the committee, Joe, that has been leaking information, the Senate Intel Committee, for eons.
There was even an arrest of a staffer over there for leaking stuff.
I'm not so sure what Burr's role in those leaks are.
Others aren't either.
But it's Burr's committee that he's the chairman of that has been leaking like a sieve.
I think he's panicking because maybe Johnny Ratcliffe knows a little something about that.
Maybe, coulda, shoulda, woulda, kinda.
Rhinos.
The rhinos are coming out, folks.
Ratcliffe needs to be confirmed.
Do not accept no for an answer.
You're in charge.
These senators work for you.
Make sure Ratcliffe gets that nod at DNI or we will never get to the bottom of this.
I covered this on yesterday's show, too.
You can always measure the danger to the left of a nominee by the ferocity of their response.
They are losing their minds over Ratcliffe.
Stay on it, folks.
All right, thanks again for tuning in today.
I really appreciate it.
Please subscribe to my YouTube channel, youtube.com slash Bongino.
You can also subscribe to our audio show, please, on Apple Podcasts, iHeartRadio, SoundCloud, Google Podcasts, and elsewhere.
It helps us move up the charts, lets other people find the show.
We try to keep the marketing budget low here, so we really appreciate your help.
