Ep. 799 The Liberal Culture War Hits Critical Mass
Summary:
In this episode I address the outrageous decision by Nike to make Colin Kaepernick the face of its new ad campaign. I also address the profound impact of the Trump presidency on the courts.
News Picks:
Who is Stefan Halper? And why was he spying on the Trump team?
Margot Cleveland’s new piece addresses a key flaw in the FBI’s investigative tactics in the Papadopoulos case.
This Miami Herald piece shows who the real Colin Kaepernick is.
What is Nike doing? This may be one of the worst business decisions in U.S. history.
John Brennan loves Colin Kaepernick.
Illegal immigrants are opting out of government welfare programs due to Trump’s immigration policies.
Copyright CRTV. All rights reserved.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get ready to hear the truth about America with your host, Dan Bongino.
What is it?
What is it?
Are you entertained?
Oh my gosh, folks.
Welcome to the Dan Bongino Show.
Are you watching this Senate hearing for Kavanaugh?
Oh my gosh.
The Democrats, you want chaos?
Yeah, no, I'm telling you, you want chaos?
You sure?
We can give it to you.
You want chaos?
We'll give that to you.
You sure that's what you want?
You thought you wanted to scrap the filibuster too?
Look at how well that worked out for you.
You want chaos?
We can give you chaos.
This actually wasn't even going to be part of the show today, but now since the Democrats have lost their minds in the hearing and have made complete fools, clowns, jokes, frauds, Street show performers.
Total chaos out of the hearings for Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court Justice, which started today, in case you missed it.
If you didn't, if you're not, it is absolute chaos right now in the, it is the WWE right now.
All right, Joe, Producer Joe, how are you today?
I'm doing okay, man.
If I don't ask you that, people get very upset.
You don't understand.
So I gotta be sure to get that in every day.
I made the mistake of missing that once, and man, did I get emails like you wouldn't believe.
All right.
I've got a lot to get to.
I got a stacked show.
As we said, the Kavanaugh hearings, Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee, the Senate confirmation hearings begin today.
The Democrats have made embarrassments and fools out of themselves, but they've always been fools.
I'm talking about up on the Hill.
I'm not talking about out there in America, because I think a lot of moderate Democrats are watching this embarrassed that these people represent their party.
Bunch of clowns in there screaming.
That was that old song.
The fool who's on the hill.
Yeah, there you go.
I never heard it.
Sorry.
The fool on the hill was the song.
You know me.
We just made it plural.
People, protesters, screaming in the crowd, getting thrown out.
Just a litany of embarrassing episodes.
Just a total disgrace.
But that's the Democrats.
That's who they are.
They're a broken, pathetic, sorry bunch of losers up on the hill.
It's true.
So I want to get to that.
I want to get to Nike.
Dude.
Nike and probably the worst or definitely one of the worst business decisions in the history of American business and a couple more stories as well.
All right, today's show brought to you by our buddies at WaxRx.
Love WaxRx.
You know, I had a big problem in my former line of work sticking that earpiece in my ear with wax buildup.
It's tough.
You can't hear anything.
It's a real pain and sometimes you don't even know it.
You just stop hearing stuff, right?
So, you know I love my sponsors and I only work with companies I believe in.
When I heard about WaxRx, I said, yeah, definitely bring them on board.
I would use that.
I tried it out myself.
My family tried it to clean earwax out of our ears without having a, you know, you're not supposed to stick those Q-tips and those cotton swabs in your ear.
It's bad.
That's not what they're for.
They're for the outside of your ear.
And if I believe it's a value to you because it's a value to me, I'll read for him, and WaxRX was a perfect fit.
Listen, it's not the sexiest product to talk about, but as I told you, I had to deal with the earwax buildup because the earpiece I wore all day in my prior line of work and now on radio.
This is a customer review from WaxRX I saw from them and I wanted to share with you because it shows what the product can do to help everyday people and help you avoid expensive trips to the doctors for earwax removal.
I used to have to go to the doctor twice a year to get rid of my stubborn, hardened earwax.
With the rising cost of healthcare and thus double deductible, I'd spend $60 a visit.
That's $120 a year to treat my ears.
Now I can do it myself with WaxRx.
You get a significant savings and it doesn't require me to miss half a day of work.
Thanks, WaxRx.
That's a real email.
Right now, you can try the WaxRX system by typing in gowaxrx.com.
That's gowaxrx.com.
Use offer code DAN at checkout for free shipping.
gowaxrx.com.
Don't wait.
You have no idea what you might be missing because of inner earwax.
Who knows?
It might just change your life.
gowaxrx.com.
Offer code DAN.
Great product.
We love it.
Used it just the other days, man.
Okay, first, yeah, the Kavanaugh hearing.
Folks, listen, you want chaos, we're gonna give them chaos, okay?
I don't know any nice diplomatic way to say this, but we live in a constitutional republic.
In the constitutional republic, this is not a direct democracy.
It's not a plebiscite here.
This is a constitutional republic, the way we operate.
We don't vote on issues.
We vote on people to vote on issues.
If we're going to vote on people who are going to act like complete imbeciles and losers like they are right now up in this hearing up on the Hill, they have this Senate confirmation hearing going on for Kavanaugh.
In case you missed it, I'll just give you a quick synopsis.
It's total, complete chaos.
The Democrat loons apparently have trucked in a bunch of protesters to scream and yell.
It took about five to ten minutes to get the protesters out.
It wouldn't even let the hearing start.
As the chairman, Chuck Grassley, started to talk, the Democrats started to interrupt him with a bunch of nonsensical motions, not for the purpose of getting the motion passed, but for the purpose of stopping the hearing.
The Democrats want chaos.
The Democrats want the collapse of the Constitutional Republic.
The Democrats don't care anymore, folks.
They don't care.
The any semblance or of law and order or fidelity to rules in a system is gone and is out the window.
Now the analogy I've used in the past and the problem we're having here is if we as constitutional conservatives, Republicans and Libertarians adhere to a set of rules that the other side doesn't respect, I don't know, there's no practical path forward to To getting back to what would be a normal sense of order and the only analogy I can use for you is if this is a boxing match and one side decides that they're going to put lead weights in their gloves and they're going to bite you and knee you below the belt during the boxing match and the other side, us, says no we're going to stick by the rules.
The problem is it's not survivable.
It's not just that you're going to lose the match, it's that it's not even survivable.
Right.
What I'm getting at here, Joe, is the Constitutional Republic is not survivable if the fidelity to the rules is only applied to by one side.
Now, I don't know any other way to say this, but if these guys in this hearing will not let this hearing go on, then there has to be procedural votes in the Senate to take a vote whether they're there or not.
I don't care.
Shut off their microphones, do whatever you want.
Oh man, we're gonna look like tyrants.
What?
Are you serious?
You have a side right now, the Democrats, who because they lost an election, because they lost the Senate, and they lost the House of Representatives, in a fair election despite all their nonsensical, ridiculous, hyperbolic assertions otherwise, is absolutely refusing to abide by the Senate consent rule.
Oh, but Merrick Garland.
They didn't have the votes for Merrick Garland!
End of story!
You didn't have the Senate!
It's not our fault you suck and can't win an election in the Senate!
How about that?
That's not our fault!
It is not our fault that when Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, you didn't have the votes to get him through in the last year of a presidency, and we just obeyed the Biden rule.
Joe Biden himself, when he was a U.S.
Senator, said that we shouldn't be taking on a vote for a Supreme Court nominee in the end year of a presidency.
You don't like it?
Go win a darn election.
But you can't because you suck.
That's why.
Your party sucks, your ideas suck.
I'm sorry folks, I'm not being diplomatic today.
I am tired of these police state tyrants getting people spied on, locked up, presidential opposition people, government being weaponized, weaponizing the IRS, and conservatives, well, we gotta play by the rules.
There's no rules!
Do you understand the rules are gone?
Grasley.
He's a nice guy.
I like him.
But I'm sorry.
It's time to shut the microphones off.
You know what?
I'll tell you what.
These guys don't want to shut up, Joe.
Take the confirmation vote right now.
Do whatever you can.
The rules.
Alright, everybody's got two minutes.
You got a question?
I don't care what the... The media's going to be upset.
He's going to be deemed an illegitimate... I don't care!
Do you understand that the rules are gone?
The Democrats have brought about a state of complete, utter, total chaos.
This is an embarrassment.
This is not a hearing.
This is a complete sideshow.
This is a joke.
It's a street performance.
It's a farce.
It's a shell game in Times Square.
By the way, don't ever play.
You know you can't win those, right?
Right.
When I was a cop and a cadet in New York City, you can't win that.
There's no bean under the shell, OK?
You can't win those games, I promise you.
Once in a blue moon, they let someone win just so other people come in.
This is a shell game.
It's a total farce.
We have to go now it's time if you're going to put lead weights in your gloves we're putting lead weights in ours too.
Shut it down.
Use every parliamentary senate procedure you can.
These guys don't want to shut up and they don't want to let the hearing go and they don't want to abide by the rules of the republic then we don't have to abide by them or better off use the rules and make them look silly.
I didn't want to waste a lot of time on this, but I'm just so beyond frustrated with Republicans up on the Hill who continue to try and maintain some sense of unearned decorum.
What do you mean decorum?
The place has devolved into a total mess!
This is a disgrace!
Folks, if you haven't seen it, don't worry, you're not missing it.
I'm giving you the update you need now.
If you're headed home from work tonight, you're listening to this at five o'clock.
If you're listening to this in your lunch hour.
The Senate hearings to nominate uh excuse me to um Confirmed Kavanaugh are happening now to the Supreme Court, according to the Constitution, how it works.
The Democrats get to answer questions.
The Republicans get to get to ask questions.
Excuse me.
The Republicans get to ask questions.
Kavanaugh answers the questions and they take a vote.
The Democrats aren't interested in that.
They trucked in a bunch of protesters to scream and yell.
The senators are screaming and yelling like maniacs.
They're embarrassing themselves.
They're all trying to get money from donors.
It's devolved into complete chaos.
So again, just get up there, Graslie, and say, Mike's are getting shut off.
Listen, if you're not going to let this go forward, mics are shut off.
And let the media?
Who cares what the media says?
Why do you care?
The other side is pounding you into oblivion with brass knuckles and lead weights.
And we're concerned about the media?
Who cares?
This is an embarrassment.
A farce.
A total disgrace.
You want chaos?
We'll give you chaos.
That's the attitude we need to take now.
It's ridiculous.
Fidelity to the rules.
There are no rules anymore.
Rules.
The Trump era rules.
You weaponized the government to spy on a presidential candidate.
You weaponized the IRS to take out PACs you didn't like on the conservative side.
You let four patriots die in Benghazi and still haven't come up with an adequate explanation why you didn't save them and all of a sudden the rule... give me a break with the rules.
Shut up.
You know, I think what bothers a lot of us on this side is that nobody's got the pinecones to enforce the law.
Dude, the pinecones.
I've heard a lot of analogies.
I've never heard the behind the scenes.
They don't!
They don't!
Listen, I like Graslie, but this is absurd.
You got a bunch of Democrat senators losing their marbles, humiliating themselves on a national stage, embarrassing themselves, and Graslie's like, hey, you know, we got all week to do.
No, we don't.
I would shut that down right now.
Yep.
Oh, man.
All right, so I'll keep you updated.
I've got this thing on, but it's just chaos.
Totally embarrassing.
Okay, Nike.
Oh, my gosh.
This has got to be the worst business decision I've seen in modern American history.
Dude!
I mean, seriously.
When I saw this yesterday, I am not kidding.
For those of you that missed it, by the way, forgive me.
Sometimes I get right into the story, assuming you've seen it.
My mistake.
Colin Kaepernick, you know, anti-American kneeler who started the whole, let's embarrass the country and disgrace the national anthem by kneeling during the singing of our national anthem at NFL football games.
Most of you know who he is.
Kaepernick doesn't have a contract in the NFL right now, but who comes to the rescue?
Nike.
Nike.
Yes.
N-I-K-E.
That Nike.
I read this story about Nike pulling Kaepernick in.
Apparently he's been on the Nike payroll for a long time as an ad man.
As a pitch man.
They rolled out their new Just Do It campaign, which is an old campaign.
You know Nike, Just Do It, that's one of their sayings, Just Do It.
And they've had an elite group of athletes who have done this.
So the face of their new Just Do It campaign is Colin Kaepernick.
Folks, I swear to you when I read this, I'm not making this up.
If you're wondering why I didn't tweet about it yesterday, despite my interest in this issue having been a cop myself and this disgrace of a human being, Kaepernick, who wore socks during practice with cops depicted as pigs.
If you're wondering why I didn't tweet anything about it yesterday, I didn't tweet anything about it yesterday because I thought this can't be real.
That there is no way a major corporate brand like Nike That appeals to a bipartisan heartland bubble, coastal elite bubble, a broad swath of people, geographically, regionally, and politically, that there is absolutely no way that the Nike board would okay a decision like this to take on such a disgraced figure such as Colin Kaepernick.
I thought there's simply no way.
I saw articles in actual credible places and I thought, Joe, somebody's getting work.
This is not real.
There's no way Nike is this stupid.
Ladies and gentlemen, unfortunately, Nike is this stupid.
I cannot believe, this is going to be, I believe, one of the biggest conservative boycotts and American boycotts of a brand you've seen in American history.
Now, In case you think this was a good decision, I'm a free marketeer.
I let the market decide, just like the market decided that the absurd liberal boycott of In-N-Out Burger was a bad call because In-N-Out Burger was packed.
There were lines around the corner.
I covered that for the last two days, so no need to readdress that.
You can listen to the shows for details.
So In-N-Out Burger, liberals announce a boycott, Lay-In-N-Out Burger is packed.
Now that's not a publicly traded company, but we can assume their business went through the roof because liberal boycotts are always a joke because liberals don't believe in anything.
They only believe in state power, but just not for them because they're hypocrites, right?
I told you though, when conservatives boycott, It is big trouble for businesses.
Dick's Sporting Goods, Target, the NFL.
It will do lasting damage because as I always say, conservatives never, ever forget.
Ever, ever, ever.
You violate our trust, it's over.
Sweep the leg, Johnny.
It's over.
So the market opens this morning, Joe.
Nike stock is down 2-3% this morning.
Of course it is.
Wiping out millions of dollars in value in the company.
Shazam!
I love Coburn.
I actually know that one, shockingly.
I barely know these things.
Wiping out all of this value because conservatives, now I have Nike shoes, I have Nike shorts, I'm telling you right now, I will not be buying Nike ever again.
I told my wife and my daughter last night, my daughter was disappointed.
She actually likes Nike.
She likes Nike products.
There's a Nike store in the Gardens Mall in Palm Beach.
I am now done with Nike forever.
I used to be a big fan of Nike Freeze.
That is the last pair I've ever bought.
So, goodbye Nike.
Listen, I'm not a rich man, but I'm definitely not a poor man.
I've worked hard my whole life, I've made some good investments, but I'm going to guess, Joe, with me alone, my family, and our consumption of Nike products through the years, that that decision alone in my family is probably going to cost Nike upwards of five to ten thousand dollars over the course of our lifetime, maybe more.
Yeah, you guys use a lot of athletic gear and stuff.
Oh my gosh, my daughter swims, she rows, my youngest daughters are athletic, my oldest daughter's into just about everything.
She wants to play basketball, I run, I do crossfit type exercises, everything from mixed martial arts down.
I am done with Nike.
D-O-N-E.
Stick a fork in Nike for me.
Goodbye now.
They have a 2% stock drop.
Now, let me just give you some red meat for your liberal friends, because I'm sure your liberal friends are going to have some kind of a ridiculous comeback.
Here is the problem I have with this in contrast to In-N-Out.
Because your liberal friends, understandably so, on Twitter, because they're always looking for an argument and a way, sadly, to embarrass and make America look silly.
And Kaepernick is their guy.
Liberals love Kaepernick because they love to disrespect the National Anthem.
A lot of them, not all of them.
But it's sad, but true.
Here is the difference.
In-N-Out Burger did not choose to make the Republican Party platform a central tenet of their brand and advertising campaign.
Joe, if I'm unclear on this, please stop me because I want the audience to understand the distinction.
There's no hypocrisy here.
Matter of fact, In-N-Out Burger was very clear, and they are right by the way, all you have to do is look at their donation history through the FEC, the Federal Election Commission, In-N-Out Burger has made donations to Democrats and Republicans.
And In-N-Out Burger was crystal clear in their public statement on why they made this donation to the Republican Party.
They're interested in the business climate of California.
They donate to pro-business Democrats and pro-business Republicans.
Ladies and gentlemen, there's nothing controversial about that at all.
No.
I support through my money and buy, I don't mean donations, but I buy products from companies that I'm sure have donated to the Democrat Party.
I'm sure of it.
As long as it's not a part of your public branding, and it's not an effort to, you know, indoctrinate my kids, you know, it happens.
People donate to causes, that's fine.
The difference show, and make sure I'm clear on this, you are the audience on Buzzman, is In-N-Out did not make this some public campaign.
In-N-Out did not go out and put on their, uh, put on the bags that they sell their hamburgers in, you know, tax cuts for all!
They, you know, vote GOP!
That's not what they did.
No, election laws, they couldn't do that, but you get my point.
Yeah.
Nike has chosen, voluntarily, in one of the worst business decisions, and this business decision will be taught in business schools for eons, as an example of what not to do.
I believe this is going to be the straw that breaks the camel's back, I'm sure of it.
Ladies and gentlemen, I believe we've reached a moment.
Conservatives now understand the market power of boycotts.
Nike chose to make Kaepernick the face of their company in the Just Do It campaign.
The face!
In other words, this is us.
This is us.
And that us, the kneelers I'm talking about, the kneelers, the disrespecting the National Anthem folks, the pigs on the socks depicted as, cops depicted as pigs, the statements about Cuba and Castro that Kaepernick made.
Oh, I got that.
I'll get to that in a second.
Americans out there who love this country of all races, colors, and creeds, Joe, are saying, no, no, no.
That may be you Nike, but that ain't us.
I love my country.
For its flaws, for its sins, for its people.
I love my country.
There is no more aspirational country that tries to stay on the righteous path as often as we do.
There is no country on earth as benevolent, as generous, or as forfeited more of its lives to defend the freedom and liberty of others.
You want to kneel before that national anthem in front of a national audience?
You do it on your own.
You want to make this guy the face of your brand?
That brand ain't me.
You can take those sneakers and throw them in a barbecue pit outside because I'm done with them.
Now, having said that, I'm not going to burn my sneakers because I think it emits toxins.
I'm a conservative environmentalist.
I mean that.
I believe in the free markets.
But I love clean water and clean air.
I can't burn my sneakers.
I'm sorry.
I just don't want to do it, to burn them.
It's over.
My business relationship with Nike is absolutely done.
And I am exactly what you want.
What is that, what's your, what's that key advertising demo?
18 to 54, something like that?
Yeah.
Something like, yeah, you know, you're in radio, you know what I am in that key demo now.
So is my, uh, so is my wife and we would spend for our family.
You just lost us for good, but it is because, and I want to be precise here, you actually, it's not that you made a donation to a cause.
It's that you made this guy, the face of your company saying, this is what we represent.
Well, I've got news for you.
American patriots who've died for this country, who have family who've died for this country, and who would die for this country and love what it stands for despite all its flaws.
That's not us.
That's not us.
This is one of the worst business decisions in American history.
You've disgraced yourself, you've disgraced your company, disgraced the country, the NFL, and Nike, I assure you, I say this with no air of pretension at all.
This show has become a force in conservative politics.
Thanks exclusively to you.
I work hard on it, but it's you, the audience, and you spreading the word that have made this show the force it is.
And Joe and I, believe me, are honored and I thank God every night for all the opportunities he's put in front of me.
I mean that.
Yes, sir.
But if you think for a moment that I am the only one talking about this today on the air, you are out of your mind.
This is going to be a hot topic because it touches a nerve for so many American patriots who just want one thing we can collectively agree on.
And you know what that one thing is, Joe?
We're a country that's flawed.
We're a country of sinners.
But we are a great country that has aspirational ideas of freedom and liberty that have sacrificed so much.
We are the most benevolent, most charitable.
We have left our dead on foreign shores defending the liberty of others multiple times.
You read the stories of the storming of Normandy Beach, of the boys of Ponduho.
You read these stories over and over and over again.
The Chosen River.
Men and women dying for not only our freedoms but the freedom of others and you choose to disgrace the national anthem, to kneel before it as a way to disrespect others, as a way to advance your cause for systemic oppression while you're collecting a check for millions of dollars claiming you sacrificed?
What exactly did you sacrifice?
And Nike backs this up?
No, no, no, no, no.
So Nike, let me read something to you.
Not only did your new ad sponsor, by the way, wear a pair of socks with cops depicted as pigs.
Disgusting.
Nike should be... If you're a police officer or law enforcement out there buying this product, I'm sorry, I don't know what you're thinking.
It's a free country, do what you want, you're more than welcome here to listen to the show, but that is a very, very bad decision.
But let me read something to you in this article, please.
Go to the show notes.
Sign up for my email list.
I hate to keep playing, but it's important.
Sign up to my email list or go to Bongino.com.
I pick out the show notes.
There's a 2016 piece from the Miami Herald about Colin Kaepernick.
It's an older piece.
Pull it up on your phone.
Keep it there.
It is absolutely critical you keep this piece up.
Because at the end, a Miami Herald reporter starts asking Colin Kaepernick about Fidel Castro.
Killer.
Communist killer, Castro.
La Perrette.
The wall.
Lined up people against the wall.
Shot them.
Political tyrant.
Oppressor.
Killer.
Murderer.
Murderer of hundreds of thousands.
Keeper of political prisoners.
The disgrace Fidel Castro.
He's asked a question about Castro back in 2016.
Why, Joe?
Because Kaepernick had a shirt on depicting Malcolm X's meeting with Fidel Castro.
Here's a quote from Colin Kaepernick about killer, murderer, killer of men, women, suppressor and snuffer-outer of human life.
You yearn for liberty in Cuba, there's a good chance you were in a political prison or you're dead.
Wiped out.
Stealer of life, liberty, money, happiness, food.
Starving his people to death.
Human mutt.
Pig Fidel Castro.
You want to know who the real pig is?
A stain on human society, on human civilization, the likes of which few can surpass.
Here's a statement about Pig Fidel Castro.
From Kaepernick.
One thing Fidel Castro did do is that they have the highest literacy rate because they invest more in their education system than they do in their prison system.
Which we do not do here, even though we're fully capable of doing that.
Kaepernick said.
The reporter writes in this piece.
Is this real life?
This response is, please read this piece in the Herald.
It's from 2016.
The reporter's response, Joe.
He's Cuban, by the way.
The reporter.
Is this real life?
First, Cuba does not have the highest literacy rate, and he cites a link.
Second, don't be surprised if the same people who report Cuba's admittedly high literacy rate are related to those who report its election results.
You know, Joe, the elections where Castro gets 100% of the vote.
What?
The polls are really reliable there.
Murderer.
Pig.
Castro gets 100% of the vote.
Or God.
Of course, he can't get any votes anymore.
Not around to do that.
But gets 100% of the vote.
So we're supposed to trust- Number one, they don't have the highest literacy rate in the world.
You can check the links in the report for that.
But secondly, he makes a great point.
We're supposed to trust Cuba's public sentiment, a society where if you vote for the opposition, you're probably killed or in political prison?
Third, could it be Cuba- This is the author again, I'm quoting him.
Third, could it be Cuba doesn't have to invest a lot?
In its prison system because, you know, Joe, dungeons and firing squads are not expensive to maintain.
They don't spend a lot on their prisons.
That's because when they throw people in political prison, they don't feed them.
They starve them to death.
Or, Joe, they just line them up against the wall and shoot them and kill them like pig communists do.
Pigs.
Oh, you don't like it?
This may not be the right show for you then.
I'm sorry.
You will get no quarter here if you are a socialist pig.
None.
If you pride yourself on the taking of others' lives, liberty, their happiness, their kids' happiness, their prosperity, their chance at a future, their opportunity, their freedom, their vote, everything, and you imprison them, you're a subhuman animal.
You deserve everything you get.
He goes on, the author.
Finally, it's bizarre that Kaepernick is extolling the education system of a country where people believe launching out into shark-infested seas to flee is a better idea than staying there.
This is Colin Kaepernick, Nike.
This is your new guy.
Disgrace, Nike.
What the hell were you thinking?
Now, if you're a hard-working man or woman out there that works for Nike, because I know I always get a lot of emails, I understand.
Not you.
You got to make a living.
I totally get it.
I'm not trying to blame you for this.
Obviously not your call.
But if you were one of the board members or ad people who had any say in the acceptance of this anti-American, anti-cop, disgraced former athlete as your ad man, you are a horrifyingly stupid individual.
And your company is going to pay.
And your company is going to pay big time.
I assure you.
Nike.
is going to be the new target and the new dick sporting goods.
Just that on steroids.
Nobody will ever, ever forgive you for this.
So here's the solution, Joe.
I can suggest to you what to do.
Obviously, I can't implement it.
It's a free market.
You do what you want.
You will lose.
This is going to bury your company long term.
You're not going to go out of business.
You're too big of a company and a global brand.
I'm sure.
But I promise you, the company you could have been is now dead.
Now the company you will be is not the company you could have been.
But what you should have done, and what you should do going forward, is immediately fire this guy tomorrow.
And do a public mea culpa to every cop, every military veteran, and every family who ever lost someone overseas for bringing on a guy who has disgraced the memory of your loved one and the working habits of your law enforcement family member or you yourself who go out there every day and put your butts on the line to keep these board members of Nike and their families safe while their new ad man wears socks with pigs on them.
In his practice sessions to disgrace every single law enforcement guy out there while he collects millions of dollars in checks.
This guy is a disgrace to humankind and an embarrassment.
All right.
I've got a couple other stories I want to get to, including another great piece by Margo Cleveland at The Federalist, who does really terrific work.
She brings up just an interesting, it's a quick one, but a fascinating question about Papadopoulos.
And I also want to talk about California and what's going on with them.
You know, you can always count on California to leave you with some business craziness, including the absolutely failed In-N-Out Burger boycott.
You can't even get it in an Alperg.
I guess I wish it was a publicly traded company.
I would have bought stock.
So, oh, this hearing is such a farce.
What an embarrassment.
Still going on.
All right.
Today's show also brought to you by buddies at Policy Genius.
September is National Life Insurance Awareness Month.
Most people aren't aware of that.
In fact, most people aren't aware they need life insurance at all.
You do.
That's why 40% of people don't have it.
I have it.
Big, big deal.
I need it.
I always tell my wife, if you're going to keep anything on auto, pay and make sure that bill is paid, pay the life insurance.
But getting life insurance doesn't need to be difficult or expensive.
Right now, prices are the lowest they've been in 20 years, and policy genius has made it easier than ever to get covered.
Listen, I got life insurance early.
I've always been afraid given some sadly early departures too soon of family members in my life.
I did not want that to happen and leave my family in a financial rut.
It matters to me.
It matters to you too.
Policy genius is the easiest way to get life insurance online.
In just two minutes, you can compare quotes from the top insurers to find the best policy for you.
And when you compare quotes, you save money.
It's really that simple.
PolicyGenius has helped over 4 million people shop for insurance and has placed over 20 billion dollars in coverage.
They don't just make life insurance easy, they also compare disability insurance, renters insurance, and health insurance.
If you care about it, they can cover it.
So if you're looking for a good reason to buy life insurance, here's three.
It's National Life Insurance Awareness Month, prices are at a 20-year low, and PolicyGenius makes it easy to get the right policy for you.
Go to, here it is, policygenius.com.
That's policygenius.com and get quotes and apply in minutes.
You can do the whole thing on your phone right now.
That's policygenius.com, policygenius.com.
The easy way to compare and buy life insurance.
Check them out.
They're great.
Super easy to use too.
Okay.
Just quickly on California, because I want to move on to a couple other things.
I got some news stuff that I've been missing because we've been so loaded down with heavy stuff that I've missed some of the newsy stuff, and it's important because I want you to beat the liberals to the punch.
So hysterically, Obamacare is on its last legs, folks, whether you know it or not.
I haven't covered an Obamacare story in a long time.
The reason is Obamacare has bedrocked itself in two things.
Community rating and guaranteed issue.
I used to talk about this all the time.
I haven't brought it up in a while.
But the core tenet of Obamacare is community rating, meaning you're going to roughly, you're going to price insurance not according to the market price or what it actually costs, but you're going to price it according to a government formula.
Meaning, Joe, if you were an older American, and as you know, I'm only 43, but as I get older, I'm requiring more medical attention than I did when I was younger due to the beatings I've taken.
Older Americans generally are more expensive to insure.
Not surprisingly, because they have problems associated with age.
Just chronological time wears the body down.
That's not surprising, right?
Right.
All the Americans are expensive to insure.
The government apparently doesn't recognize that and has instituted a formula to say, well, we're not going to price their insurance according to a market, we're going to price it according to a government formula.
That's called community rating.
The ratio Is roughly three to one.
So you can't price an older person's insurance more than three times the price of a younger person's insurance, which absurdly leads to what?
Severely underpricing the insurance for older folks, which means they have to bump up the price of insurance for younger folks who don't have any money or aren't in a financial position of strength in their lives, typically.
As a general rule, Joe, can we agree in your 20s you're not nearly as wealthy as you are in your 50s and 60s?
Okay, thanks.
Were you?
Okay, me either.
In my 20s I had nothing.
I drove a Honda Civic Del Sol that turned orange because I parked it in a federal law enforcement training center when I went through secret service training and the Georgia sun, it was red, cooked it and made it orange, okay?
So there's a three to one ratio.
I did not have the money in my 20s, I did in my older age, right?
Community rating means you will charge old people this amount of money, young people this amount of money.
It doesn't work.
It's an absolute failure because the bills don't go anywhere.
If you're an older American consuming a lot of health care related services, someone has to pay.
So ironically, the younger people voting for Obamacare, you're the ones getting screwed and you're voting for this because you're paying more for your insurance to compensate older people.
Now, there's a better way to do that.
And to reduce insurance for everyone.
It's called the free market and getting government out of the system.
But the Democrats don't want that.
So they insist on community rating and basically, Joe, artificial price caps.
Yeah.
You can't charge older people more than this.
Yeah, but they cost more.
Well, just make the money go away.
Well, it's not.
The doctor needs to get paid.
Well, who's going to pay it?
What was the answer?
The younger people.
Your grandkids.
That's who's paying it.
That's who's paying.
So community rating was number one.
Second was guaranteed issue, where not only do you have to subscribe to this price control plan for your insurance, but you have to give people insurance almost any time.
It's called guaranteed issue.
Don't forget these two principles.
Because everywhere they've been tried, they've failed miserably, including places like New York and other liberal states where some component of this was implemented and insurance costs are through the roof, right?
Guaranteed Issue makes it even worse, because now not only do you not have to maintain insurance for your lifespan, In some form.
You can get it at any time.
Any insurance company has to give it to you.
Well, what's the problem with that?
Well, the problem with that is obvious, folks.
If you're not paying insurance premiums from whatever 16 on or whatever it may be or 18 on in your life and then all of a sudden you get into a car accident.
We're America.
This is the United States.
You're going to be taken care of in an emergency room.
Well, thankfully.
We don't want to let you die, you know.
But somebody's still got to pay the bill.
Who pays?
You, because you didn't have insurance.
Guaranteed Issues said, oh, even if you don't have insurance, Joe, they have to guarantee you a certain price through community rating, and you can get it almost any time.
So what do you do?
You're a guy who rides a motorcycle, which is great.
Do your own thing.
But say you smoke, you live a higher risk lifestyle.
Motorcycles can be more risky than cars.
Smoking is obviously going to lead to a higher risk of lung cancer and other things.
You say, I'm not going to get insurance.
I'm going to get it the day before I go in the hospital for a lung cancer treatment.
Well, that's not insurance.
That's a welfare program.
So Community Rating and Guaranteed Issue have bankrupted Obamacare.
Obamacare will not work because of those two things.
Honest to God, folks, if you don't have a lot of time to research the details of it, like IPAB and other things, the Payments Advisory Board and other things like that, that's fine.
I'm telling you as your trusted commentator here, if you understand Community Rating and Guaranteed Issue, price controls, and the fact that they have to issue insurance at any time, which is not insurance, it's welfare, You understand why Obamacare will never, ever, ever work no matter what.
It is an economic catastrophe and an impossibility.
Now, having said that, the fact that Trump, thankfully, and the Republican Congress eliminated the individual mandate to buy Obamacare, People are pulling out of Obamacare in droves.
Why?
Because community rating is up to price for younger healthy people who can't afford to offset the cost for older people who are paying less due to community rating.
So they're bailing out in droves the younger healthy people who joke.
Because they're younger and healthy, don't consume as much medical services, and Obamacare had relied on them through the mandate to buy insurance, known as the individual mandate, to be legally forced by the IRS to buy insurance.
The mandate is gone.
Bye bye!
See ya!
Wouldn't want to be ya.
The individual mandate went away.
Therefore, young healthy people are like, hey listen, I'm not paying that premium.
I'm out.
What happened then?
It only left behind sicker people, and those sicker people are paying higher and higher premiums, and it pulled out all the other people who are paying the premiums, therefore the pool of Obamacare premiums to offset the artificial price controls for older people has gone away.
In other words, folks, older people who are consuming more healthcare, who are in Obamacare, who are not on Medicare yet, They needed those younger people's premiums to pay the bills.
That's just the economic reality of it.
You see where I'm going with this?
The younger people, now that they're not forced because Trump got rid of the individual mandate to buy crappy Obamacare, pulled out.
Now some of the older folks who have this crappy Obamacare, their prices are going up because there's not enough younger people to be legally forced by the IRS to buy this crappy Obamacare.
It's important you understand that.
So what happened next?
Trump has been dismantling this garbage Obamacare forever and it is a beautiful thing to watch.
First he gets rid of the individual mandate giving people a choice but now Obama, he was very slick, Obama and the Democrats.
What they did, Joe, is they allowed these short-term plans, if you left your job or something like that, that were not Obamacare plans, they allowed you to have them, but you were only allowed to have them for three months or so.
So they weren't a long-term solution.
So what did Trump do?
Trump... I love when Trump does this.
He comes in, he goes, ah, let's look at that.
He allowed American consumers who don't want to be in Obamacare plans to buy short-term plans, Joe, that last a year.
Ew.
But were renewable for up to 36 months.
Ladies and gentlemen, this was not a small change.
Why?
Because people are now bailing out in droves of Obamacare buying these short-term plans Which are not as comprehensive, but this is their choice.
They don't want it.
They don't want to pay the premiums.
They want maybe catastrophic coverage, cancer coverage, HIV, hepatitis, things that are serious that could really do damage.
But they don't want eyeglass coverage.
They don't want coverage for a general physical exam.
They don't want to pay in cash.
It's their choice.
People are piling out.
So two takeaways.
The pull out of the individual mandate by the Trump team, legislatively.
People now aren't forced.
They don't want it anymore.
They're pulling out of Obamacare.
Secondly, the availability of these short-term plans.
Now they can be extended for up to 12 months and renewable for up to 36 months.
People are like, you know what?
I'm out of Obamacare.
I'm going to get one of those short-term plans.
The Democrats are in a panic.
So what's happening?
What's the news story?
And why does this relate to you today?
Because Joe, what do liberals hate more than anything?
Choice!
Freedom!
They can't stand freedom!
Freedom!
William Wallace!
They should make a brave heart for liberals!
No freedom!
That should be their line!
Wallace gets out and goes, we don't want freedom!
They hate freedom!
So California has decided, the anti-freedom state, right?
That they're going to pass a law, Joe, They're trying to get it through now, banning these short-term plans.
So let's just be clear.
If you're in California, your government wants to stop you from freely going out and choosing an insurance plan that meets your needs only because it's a political advantage to them.
It has nothing to do with you.
It is, just to be crystal clear on this, this law only stops your freedom of choice.
It does nothing else.
It doesn't force people to leave Obamacare.
It doesn't mandate that people leave Obamacare.
It mandates one thing.
That the short-term option for you in California will be banned so you can't buy it.
That is it.
Because it's the anti-freedom state.
They want, again, the liberal Braveheart movie.
Tyranny!
That'd be William Wallace in the liberal version of the movie.
This is what they want in love.
I read this story today in the Wall Street Journal.
I absolutely can't believe it.
You know, California and how they frame it is hysterical.
We can't allow these crap plans in our state.
If they're crap plans, what are you worried about?
Joe, is my logic faulty?
If these are really garbage plans, you understand the Democrats in California, they're lying, right?
They're lying nonsense argument.
These are state representatives in California going, we can't allow these garbage plans.
If they're garbage, then don't worry about it.
What are you worried about?
People didn't buy the Lada, the Russian-produced crap box car, right?
Maybe you know the Lada?
If you've ever traveled to Russia, you've seen a Lada.
I know, they're so bad.
You drive it off the parking lot, it'll fall apart.
The Lada.
People didn't buy the Lada in the United States because it was crap.
Why are you so worried about people expressing their own humanity and choice?
If these are really crap insurance plans that consumers don't want, then why are you so worried about banning them?
Because they're not, and you're lying.
Again, I wake up every morning determined to debunk the latest liberal nonsense, and it is so comprehensive, the nonsense, that it's everywhere.
Everywhere.
All right.
By the way, we only have Joe.
Okay.
So, just so, Joe and I have code here.
Joe and I talk in code.
Semaphore.
We have like a show lingo and signs and stuff.
It's great.
But you know what?
If we go to video, Which we may be doing, so stay tuned.
We'll let you know if we have any announcements.
We and you are gonna have a tougher time there, you know?
We're not gonna be able to do our little code stuff.
All right, this is a great story by Margo Cleveland.
I have it in the show notes today, again, at Pongino.com.
Please subscribe to the email list.
It's just right there on the website.
Really appreciate it.
It's been growing by leaps and bounds.
But she has a really great story.
She does really terrific work over at the Federalist.
She has a story about Papadopoulos.
You know, my theory on Papadopoulos, of course, is that he was set up.
George Papadopoulos was the Trump team advisor, who I believe was set up as the fall guy.
He is now getting ready to be sentenced by the Mueller team for alleged lies to the FBI.
About his meetings with this professor, Joseph Mifsud.
But one of the problems I've had with this case from the beginning is what I call the push-pull hypothesis here, if we give it a fancy term here.
The push-pull hypothesis is this.
They clearly spied on the Trump team.
The Obama administration.
We know that.
They employed actual central intelligence agency, intelligence community assets to spy on the Trump team.
One of the suspects here is a guy named Stefan Halper, which also, not to keep hammering this, but I have a great story in the show notes today at Bongino.com.
Who is Stefan Halper?
So you understand the depth of the spying operation against Trump.
But that's only half the scandal, folks.
The effort by Stefan Halper and the United States government under the Obama administration to spy on the Trump team and pull negative information out about the Russians, I'm using air quotes, what they thought were the Russians, to spy on them was only half the story.
The real scandal, I have argued relentlessly from the beginning, is the push.
Forget about pulling the information out of Papadopoulos.
Hey, did somebody say something to you about the Russians?
The real scandal is who pushed the information in, and I've been very suspicious of Joseph Mifsud, who was this Maltese professor.
This Maltese professor is, according to allegations, is the one who told Papadopoulos about the dirt on Hillary.
Although, to be crystal clear, Mifsud denies this conclusively.
Dispositively.
He denies this.
He says he did not talk about cybersecurity.
He did not mention anything about emails.
Mifsud says he did not say this.
And now Papadopoulos seems to be having some new recollection about what this conversation, how this conversation happened.
Here's the Cleveland angle on this.
I'm sorry for the setup, but it's critical.
And it is an absolutely terrific point.
So if Joseph Mifsud, this Maltese professor, according to the FBI's Russian collusion story, started this whole thing by telling a Trump advisor, Papadopoulos, about this Russian dirt on Hillary back in April of 2016, how come when he was in the country on February Of 2017, speaking at a Global Ties conference sponsored by the United States State Department, who had an integral role in passing this information along to the FBI, the dirt, so-called dirt on Trump, right?
Cleveland asked a great question.
How come the FBI didn't get Papadopoulos to work for them?
Now, ladies and gentlemen, let me give you a little background.
This will make sense.
When you're a federal agent, which I did for 12 years of my life, and I loved it, The way you typically work a federal case is you rarely get the big fish immediately.
Rarely.
If you're working a... I'll give you just a quick example of a case I worked.
I worked a case in Long Island, New York.
It was a credit card fraud case.
And the way we found the credit card fraud case is we picked off a local guy in Long Island who had gone into a home repair store and had used a fake, a spurious credit card.
A fake credit card.
A stolen number to buy products.
When we arrested him, we arrested his daughter, too.
His daughter had used the stolen credit cards as well.
And what did we do, Joe?
We interviewed him and said, listen, we're looking for your cooperation.
Long story short is he gave up another guy who gave up another guy, which eventually led to an international... I'm not kidding, folks.
I'm not exaggerating.
We got some big Department of Justice award for this.
I'm gonna pat myself on the back.
I'm just trying to tell you the gravity of the crime.
Right.
It wound up turning into a 300 plus million dollar credit card fraud that was running everything from terrorist financing overseas.
It was a monstrosity.
I had to get the FBI involved.
It took me probably two years, soup to nuts, and a lot of stew phone calls to secure telephone calls to get this thing done.
You flipped the lower guy to get to the upper guy.
Why am I telling you that?
Because if you had the guy, Papadopoulos, which they did, keep in mind the timeline.
April of 2016, he has this conversation with Mifsud.
Mifsud's alleged to have told him about this Russian email thing.
The big story, right?
Russian connected people passed information to the Trump team.
The FBI grabs him at the airport in November of that year.
Again, why they waited so long, you've heard prior shows, I think I know why that is.
It's because they grab him on the same day that Peter Stroketech's come out.
Oh my gosh, look, what are we going to do to distract?
Let's go arrest Papadopoulos!
They get him on a PC charge at the airport.
They arrest him in November.
Joe, Mifsud is in the country in February.
So keep in mind, just get the timeline straight, Joe.
April, the alleged crime happens where Ms.
Sood tells him about the Russian email.
The FBI pinches him at the airport that November.
They get him in November, Papadopoulos.
They know Ms.
Sood is coming into the country a few months later in February to speak at a conference with a State Department-sponsored conference.
Joe, you are not a federal investigator, correct?
No, I'm not, Dan.
Let me ask you a simple question.
I'm not messing with you here.
I always gotta say that.
You're a federal agent investigating a guy.
You've got him in your hands now.
It's November, right?
You're investigating Papadopoulos for what you believe to be colluding with Russians to help the Trump team.
He's a member of the Trump team, or was, okay?
You've got him in your office.
Affirmative.
You know the guy.
He's alleged to have gotten the information from Mifsud is coming into the country in February.
Joe, serious question.
Yeah.
Do you think it may be a good idea to wire Papadopoulos up and get him to go meet with the guy and talk about the Russian emails again?
That way you got the whole collusion scandal on tape.
What do you think, Joe?
Boy, that's a great idea, Dan.
That's great!
You are not a federal agent, right?
No, I'm not, but I should be!
You should be!
Yes, you should be!
You'd be better off than the guys who worked this case and the women who worked this case.
What an embarrassment!
Wow.
Cleveland asked a great question.
What the hell?
Didn't you just grab Papadopoulos in November?
Lock him up on a PC warrant.
There's no PC.
Probable cause or a complaint.
Get him on an arrest warrant.
Say, George, here's the thing.
We're really concerned about Russian collusion with the Trump team.
We think you may be involved, but we think the real ringleader of this whole thing is this guy, Mifsud, who told you this whole thing.
Now, we know he's coming into the country in February.
How do we know?
Because the FBI interviewed him in February.
They obviously got a heads up, right?
I got an idea, George.
I want you to email him.
And I want you to get it on record that this guy knows about Russian dirt on Hillary and he's trying to pass it to you on the Trump team.
I want you to meet with him in February when he comes in the country.
We're going to wire you up.
We're going to put a listening device in your cell phone.
Why didn't they do that?
The answer is because they didn't want the darn answer.
That's why.
Oh!
Because if they would have wired up Papadopoulos and put him in a room with Ms.
Sood, they may not have gotten what they wanted to hear.
Which is Mifsud didn't have anything on the Russians or or there's a distinct possibility given his connections to Western intelligence that what they hear in that meeting about Mifsud's connections may not be about Russia but may have been about friendlies.
Friendly intelligence community people which would have been like The FBI didn't want the answer folks.
They didn't want the answer.
Because Mueller's job, ladies and gentlemen, is not to discover Russian collusion.
They would have flipped Papadopoulos and had him interview or go to sit down with Mifsud and worked him as a CI, a confidential informant.
The reason they didn't do that is because they didn't want the answers from Mifsud.
They interviewed Mifsud, they probably handed him a few stock questions, let him get out of the country, and Mifsud has never been seen again.
Or... Or...
Or, Mifsud may have been working for the intelligence community to pass information to the Trump team.
May!
And maybe that's not what the FBI wanted out there.
Maybe the interview of Mifsud in February where they could have used Papadopoulos if they really believed it was a Russian collusion scandal wasn't an interview at all.
Maybe it was more of a, hey, uh, Joe?
You need to really shut up about this thing.
We're going to let you get out of the country after this conference, but we don't want to see you again.
Don't you find it awfully convenient that Mifsud hasn't been seen since then?
Listen, I'm not, I'm not, again, I'm not alleging any conspiracy theory.
I'm not, I'm not saying he's in some kind of Adam Warlock cocoon somewhere, right?
But don't you find it odd?
The FBI interviews him in February.
This guy is supposed to be the founder of this whole scandal, the founder of the feast.
He started this whole thing.
The Bureau interviews him.
He's never seen again.
Never.
He's not making any public statements.
He's only speaking through surrogates.
And according to the FBI's own release documents about this, he alleges anything.
I never mentioned anything about a cyber security stuff.
This was strictly international relations.
Ladies and gentlemen, there's only two possible solutions to this.
That Mifsud was a Western intelligence asset and was told to shut his mouth to the FBI about it and his work pushing the information to the Trump team?
Or Mifsud is completely, entirely innocent.
That's a distinct possibility.
His connections to Russians had absolutely nothing to do with his meeting with Papadopoulos.
The FBI knows that, but needs Papadopoulos to be the fall guy to maintain the patina of authenticity behind this Russian collusion fairy tale.
Understand there's no alternate solution.
I know the FBI.
These guys aren't stupid.
If you believe you've got a guy willing to roll on another guy, a bigger guy in the scandal, you roll Papadopoulos into Mifsud.
Why didn't they do that?
Because they don't have anything or they don't want the answers.
That's it.
There's no option C, folks.
And let me add one final note.
With Cleveland, uh, hat tip to Margo.
Puts it in her piece again.
For those of you out there saying, well, maybe in a case of this magnitude, you know, we don't want to flip Papadopoulos.
We don't know what's going to happen.
You know, we don't want to make this case bigger than it is.
Uh, you know, maybe they wanted to maintain some order over the case.
Oh, you.
So now you don't want to pull information out.
So you don't want to flip Papadopoulos to pull information out of Massoud, but you want to flip a CIA asset.
Well, you don't need to flip them.
In Stéphane Halper, you want to use Stéphane Halper to pull information.
So let me get this straight.
You don't want to use assets to do... I'm just trying to say how ridiculous, because I know liberals.
Well, you know, we don't want to flip assets.
You know, these assets may talk... You did!
You used an asset!
You used the Central Intelligence Agency asset in Halper to email and communicate with the Trump team trying to pull information out.
Why not just flip the guy you think is the criminal in Papadopoulos, like happens every single day in the federal justice system?
Because you don't want the answer, cut the crap.
Cut the crap.
You're lying.
Lying!
They don't want the answer, folks.
This clearly was an FBI interview to either shut this guy up or when they heard the answer and they didn't like it, to shut down the investigative process to prevent the public from knowing the depths of the spying scandal on Trump and who actually pushed the information in.
Okay.
Listen, one final thing I wanted to get to in light of the Kavanaugh hearings, which are still going on right now.
It seems they've got some order back in the room.
Democrats, again, you want chaos, babe?
We'll give it to you.
Be sure that's what you want before you roll down that path.
You thought you wanted the filibuster gone too?
That hasn't quite worked out like we thought, did it?
On Trump in the courts, there's an article in the New York Times, I'm not going to put it in the show notes because I don't like giving them links, but it doesn't matter because there's really one quick takeaway, but it's a good takeaway.
Listen, the Kavanaugh hearings are happening today and this is, you know, it's great that we're going to get another Supreme Court nominee.
It looks like he'll be approved by the end of the week, despite all the Democrat chaos and nonsense.
But one important takeaway, Joe, is let's not just focus on Kavanaugh.
Right.
The Supreme Court is critical, obviously.
But ladies and gentlemen, very few cases make it to the Supreme Court.
I think that's obvious.
The real decision-makers in the United States is the Court of Appeals.
You have District Courts, Circuit Courts, and the Supreme Courts.
The Court of Appeals are that second layer.
The circuits.
The Court of Appeals has 179 judges.
Trump's already gotten through 26.
There are 13 more vacancies we can get through.
I'm talking about now.
If we can re-elect this guy and keep a Senate majority for six more years, we have the opportunity to turn the courts back to one thing, Joe.
Courts.
Actual courts.
Not black-robed legislators like they are now.
We have the opportunity to change the United States back to a constitutional republic for a long time.
This is a critical moment.
Remember, the Democrats love to take over the court system because they don't have popular opinion on their side.
The Democrats can't legislate, you know, bathroom policies and things like that because they don't have popular opinion on their side across the country, tax hikes and other things.
So what they like to do is they like to legislate using the courts.
Which are supposed to judge, not legislate.
If we can change the tide of that back to getting strict constructionists on the bench at the federal level, and it's happening.
26 confirmed, 13 more vacancies, only 179 spots.
We could change the courts for a long time, folks.
And we could do severe damage to the liberals' destruction of America and their abuse of the bureaucratic state trying to make us a discretionary state.
We are a state of laws.
This is a constitutional republic.
It's time to get back to that.
All right, folks, thanks again for tuning in.
Please subscribe to the podcast.
It's free.
You can go to iTunes, you can go to Spotify, SoundCloud.
There's an Amazon Alexa skill you can enable, Google Play.
The subscriptions matter.
They're free.
It's not, you know, there's no charge at all, obviously.
It's also, what else?
We have iHeartRadio, but the subscriptions help us get up the charts and really drive more people to the show.
We deeply appreciate it.
It means a lot to us.
Thanks so much for tuning in, and I will see you all tomorrow.
Thanks a lot.
You just heard the Dan Bongino Show.
Get more of Dan online anytime at conservativereview.com.
You can also get Dan's podcasts on iTunes or SoundCloud.
