Ep. 737 The Media Continues to Ignore this Exploding Scandal
Summary:
In this episode I address Paul Ryan’s troubling comments about Spygate along with his trepidation on the explosive Awan scandal. I also address the media’s losing efforts to derail the Trump presidency.
News Picks:
This is an older piece, but it provides a timeline that proves the discussion about Hillary’s emails started long before George Papadopoulos.
The anti-Trump FBI agent had a larger role in the investigation than previously reported.
What ever happened to the Samantha Power unmasking scandal?
Explosive information about the House IT scandal involving the Awan brothers.
Tax cuts are wonderful, but we need to do more.
Mick Mulvaney fires the entire CFPB advisory board.
Copyright CRTV. All rights reserved.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
All right, welcome to the Dan Bongino Show.
Producer Joe, how are you today?
Dan-O!
Let's go, baby.
Yes, let's do it.
I'll be in for Mark Levin tonight on the radio, by the way, if you want to call in critics, comments, whatever you got, I'll take them.
So tonight's show should be interesting.
I'll be covering a lot of this stuff, too.
Hey, Joe and I were talking before the show.
We were talking about a specific guy.
He's like, what a jerk.
And I'm like, remember the jerky boys?
Those guys used to prank call everybody.
You jerk!
Yeah!
You jerk!
Those guys, they grew up not very far from me, by the way.
I believe it was Middle Village or Maspeth in Queens.
Sounds about right.
Yeah, you remember them with the prank calls?
Saul.
Saul, I'm going to bring my glasses and my shoes.
Oh, God!
Remember that?
You jerk!
Those guys were awesome, man.
They were funny.
I got a lot to talk about today, including a piece from Tucker Carlson's show last night.
Joe was kind enough to cut up with the absolutely hapless, pathetic, sorry excuse for a human being, no less a congressman, Eric Swalwell, the purveyor of massive conspiracy theories.
X-Files fairy tales.
Just a complete clown.
An embarrassment to Congress.
An embarrassment to the country.
This guy's the absolute worst.
So we cut that up.
I got that.
And I want to address Paul Ryan as well, who seems to have taken a deep inhale of the swamp gas in D.C.
All right, today's show brought to you by our buddies at Man Crates.
Just a fantastic gift experience all around.
I love Man Crates.
Again, the salami bouquet is my personal favorite at Man Crates.
I ate the hell out of that thing, if it's even possible.
Hey, here's the problem with Father's Day.
Dad isn't going to know and isn't going to tell you what to get him.
He doesn't even know himself.
Guys are notoriously difficult to buy gifts for.
Well, I have the solution for you right now.
This Father's Day, give him a gift he's guaranteed to love with man crates!
Man crates!
Hand-picked and packaged gifts for every type of dad.
Like the knife-making kit for the hands-on dad or the whiskey appreciation crate for fathers who like the finer things.
Most gifts ship in a sealed wooden crate with a crowbar, so he gets to pry his man-crate open in front of everyone.
They're not kidding, by the way.
And the package that comes in the wooden crate is super cool.
My father-in-law uses it as a birdhouse.
I'm serious, I have a picture of it.
When is the last time you gave your dad a gift he needed a crowbar to open?
Probably never.
With Man Crates, you're giving Dad more than a gift.
You're giving him a gift experience unlike any other.
They're not kidding.
Plus, every Man Crate comes with a 100% satisfaction guarantee.
But you're not going to need it.
You're going to be satisfied.
I'm telling you, this stuff is great.
I love Man Crates.
Their selection of items is incredible.
Get your special Father's Day discount today at mancrates.com slash dan.
That's mancrates.com slash Dan.
This is a limited time offer, only for Father's Day, so go today.
That's mancrates.com slash Dan.
You will not be disappointed.
This is a great company.
I really like having them on board.
Okay, before we get to police state tyrant Derek Swalwell, big advocate of police state tactics, big government spying, tyrannical policies, really, I mean, you name it, statism.
Eric Swalwell, everything I'm embarrassed about with our federal government is represented by Eric Swalwell.
I can't say enough about how dangerous this guy is.
Still apologizing for big government police state tyranny.
Before I get to that, you can sense I'm probably a little upset about Swalwell because he continues to do this.
Him and Schiff Day!
Schiff Day!
Schiff Day!
Adam Schiff.
Another disaster up there on the hill.
I mean, these two.
These two are largely responsible for the destruction of the Constitutional Republic by continuing to advocate for this stuff.
I can't get this knucklehead out of my head because he's just... This is the guy, Swalwell, by the way, who wants to send the police to your house to confiscate your weapons if you don't follow his gun control stuff.
I'm not kidding!
Listen to his own words.
Alright, before we get to that, so Paul Ryan comes out yesterday and adds fuel to the fire of the disastrous Trey Gowdy comments, grotesquely misguided comments about the FBI investigation.
Basically saying, Paul Ryan, that he's seen nothing to challenge Gowdy's assessment that the FBI handled the Spygate controversy as we would want them to, and that they were not in fact spying on Trump or the Trump campaign.
Folks, that is simply not true.
You responding back that, well, you know, Gowdy has seen some documents.
Number one, they haven't seen all the documents.
Ryan acknowledged that yesterday.
So if you're going to come back with a response and you're going to say, well, Gowdy has seen classified documents and clearly indicating that two things, because Gowdy said two things, folks.
That your liberal friends are out there on Twitter going crazy about it.
Look out, he was right.
He said that the FBI was not in fact investigating Trump or the Trump team.
I thought that's what we've been told, that Trump was dirty and they were investigating Trump.
Now, the liberals realize they've been caught spying on Trump using their big government jackbooted thug tactics.
Now they're dialing back the story, no, no, we weren't spying on Trump.
We were spying on the Russians and Gowdy, I don't know what happened, a whiff of swamp gas in DC, I'm not sure, said, well, from everything I've seen, it appears they weren't spying on Trump and weren't investigating Trump or the Trump team.
Again, that is simply factually incorrect.
Jim Comey already acknowledged in a March 20th, 2017 appearance in front of Congress that I've already read to you verbatim.
You can watch the clip on YouTube.
It is not hard to find.
Trey Gowdy, I suggest you do this.
He has already acknowledged that the FBI was investigating ties from the Russian government to the Trump campaign.
That's on the record.
That doesn't give me any joy in saying that, that the FBI decided to target the Trump team, but insisting now, Trey Gowdy, that now that the government has been uncovered in this devious spying operation, now trying to dial it back and insisting that, oh no, no, this wasn't a spying operation on Trump, it was a spying operation on the Russians, is just utter nonsense.
Please, you all listening out there, you know I love you to death.
This show is very important to me.
I'm not attacking Trey Gowdy because I dislike the guy.
I don't know him.
I've seen him in green rooms.
He's always been nice.
He's been pleasant.
But Trey Gowdy, I don't have any personal animus towards him.
The man is in a position of significant power with a significant voice.
He has the responsibility to tell the truth.
Or if he doesn't tell the truth, to correct it.
I've done it.
When we said something that turned out later to be wrong, not because we were lying, we just, the facts changed on the ground.
The facts we had initially were just incorrect.
They were not facts.
And we've corrected stuff.
It happens all the time.
The best in the business have to correct things all the time.
Why won't Gowdy just come out and say he was wrong?
He made two assertions that the FBI handled this thing by the book, how we would want them to.
And that the FBI was not spying on Donald Trump or investigating Trump, they were investigating the Russians.
That is not true!
Comey has already said otherwise, on the record.
It is a simple, common sense fact.
So what does Ryan do?
Anybody can look it up, by the way.
Paul Ryan comes out yesterday and says, well, basically, you know, I haven't seen anything that would make me disagree with Gowdy jumping on the swamp bandwagon.
As he also admits, again, because your liberal friends are going to come out and say, because they do it to me on Twitter all the time, and they're going to say, well, Gowdy's seen all the documents and seen what you've seen, so he would know more.
Wrong.
Ryan just said yesterday, well, we still have a lot more documents to see.
So how can you make that kind of a bold conclusion in direct conflict with what Jim Comey himself said?
The FBI wasn't investigating the Trump team.
Quote, Jim Comey, we were investigating the Trump team and ties between the Russians.
That's just not accurate.
Folks, I don't have a good answer for you.
Why Gowdy and, Gowdy is leaving, Ryan is leaving, I'm not sure if they're, I don't want to get in their heads and I don't want to impugn their characters, but I, it's, if you're gonna say things like that and mislead the American people and give the propaganda police state left now ammunition to come after us again, even though you are factually incorrect on simple facts, like the FBI wasn't investigating the Trump team, It's fair enough for me to speculate as to why.
The answer is I don't have an easy answer.
They're both leaving Congress.
Are they looking for jobs in the private sector where their resumes are more palatable to people if they're not seen as Trump folks?
I don't know.
I just know what they're doing to the Republic right now is grotesquely irresponsible because they're just not telling the truth.
Now, as for the FBI handling the case by the book, that's nonsense too.
We know the FBI hid the case from Congress for eight months when they were supposed to brief them quarterly on the existence of it.
We know that they relied on a fake dossier.
I had Andy McCarthy on my NRA TV show yesterday, the former Assistant United States Attorney, and we discussed in detail the idea of vicarious credibility.
In other words, how not only the FBI not handle it by the book, by hiding the book dictates, Joe, that you brief Congress quarterly on sensitive investigations.
Quarterly, every three months.
The FBI hid the investigation from Congress for eight months.
Nobody has explained why other than Comey saying, oh, because the investigation was sensitive.
While claiming in the same back and forth with the Congresswoman that, oh yeah, the reason we brief Congress quarterly on these investigations is because they're sensitive.
Does that make any sense?
No.
But secondly, Joe, because I'm going to get into the Iwan brothers here in a minute.
I'm going to show you the hypocrisy of Paul Ryan on this.
I'm sorry.
He was a very nice guy when I ran for office.
This is not personal.
Take it that way at your own peril because you're wrong.
I actually like him very much.
Like I said, Gowdy's never been hostile to me, but they are wrong and they are doing real damage here.
Real damage to the cause of justice.
The FBI not only didn't follow by the book what they were supposed to do, the FBI relied on, and we know this from the House Intelligence Committee report on this, Select Permanent Committee on Intelligence, the FBI relied on a debunked nonsensical dossier to get a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump team.
Carter Page was a member of the Trump team at one point.
Who Carter Page and by those two hops they can hop into the Trump team, they can get who Carter Page emailed, and then they get the person they emailed too.
Those two hops probably encompass the majority of the Trump team.
All you need is one hop to someone inside the Trump campaign and then that Trump person to Trump or someone else.
Folks, to get that warrant to spy on the Trump team, they relied on a debunked dossier.
Now when Andy McCarthy was on my show yesterday on NRA TV, he gave a great interview and he
was talking about this idea of vicarious credibility.
This is super important.
Yeah, he was a good getch.
He's a great interviewer.
If you missed yesterday's show, go check it out in the library there at NRATV.com.
Be on tonight again, 5.30 p.m.
5 30 p.m. Eastern Live. The dossier was information compiled by a former British
spy Christopher Steele and the FBI has been saying the entire time, "Hey, Steele was credible!"
Steele was credible, this former spy.
We worked with him before.
We worked with him before.
Not to mention the inherent controversy of working with a foreign spy entity, Joe, to overturn the results of a United States election and spy on a campaign.
Gowdy and Ryan think that's by the book?
I mean, are they serious?
So forgetting that point for a minute, although it's a big one, That we were relying on a foreign intelligence asset to provide information to spy on a domestic political campaign.
The FBI's excuse for using the dossier, Joe, has been the entire time, well, Christopher Steele was credible, we used him before.
Folks, it was not his information.
Steele did not get the information.
He got it from Ed Baumgartner, another employee of Fusion GPS, where Christopher Steele was working, who got it from his sources.
He got it third hand!
Russian intel connected sources, Kremlin connected folks, allegedly passed this information to Baumgartner, working for Fusion GPS, who then passed it to Christopher Steele.
In other words, ladies and gentlemen, this is what McCarthy's point was, and this is critical that you understand this.
The dossier relied on the credibility of Christopher Steele, even though it wasn't his information.
You would be laughed out of court for doing this in any other case if it wasn't Donald Trump.
If I'm running for office against Joe Armacost for Congress, and I walk into the local police station, and I have a history of working with the police and providing reliable intelligence, right?
And I walk in and say, hey guys, I've got a rumor that Joe Armacost is dealing in TOW missiles.
He's a weapons smuggler out of his house in Arnold.
The first thing they're going to say is, where did you hear the information?
If the information is, hey, I got it myself.
I was working in a Starbucks one day or, you know, working out of a Starbucks.
I mean, you don't have to pay for anything.
So I was sitting there working all day in Starbucks, right?
I was stealing their Wi-Fi and he sat down next to me, Joe, and I overheard him talking and you're credible in the past.
Maybe that leads to a search warrant.
That's not what happened.
Steele didn't hear it.
What happened is I went into Starbucks, heard another guy who heard another guy, and then I walked in and said, yeah, I heard a guy in a Starbucks talking about what he heard from another guy about a guy named Joe Armacost.
And by the way, I'm running for office against him.
You'd be laughed out of court!
That's exactly, thank you, Chucky.
That's exactly what you would hear from the judge.
Play that again.
That would be the judge!
Judge Chucky!
Chucky!
Shifty!
Shifty!
Shifty'd be the judge.
Shifty would let it go, because Shifty's like that.
So would Swalwell, because they're police state tyrants.
They would love that.
A normal judge, non-judge, well, Judge Chucky would laugh, just like that.
He'd say, wait, wait, you heard it from a guy.
Who heard it from a guy that the guy you're running against for office is an international arms dealer.
Sir, do you have any other evidence?
No, nothing.
You better get out of my courtroom right now before we arrest you.
Right?
Darn right, Judge Chucky.
Shifty!
Are you kidding me?
And the FBI did this by the book?
Hide from Congress, spy on Trump team, use a source you've used in the past, while acknowledging that the source is not even providing information he heard himself.
He got it from someone, Baumgartner, who got it from someone else.
Oh my gosh!
And Paul Ryan's like, yeah buddy!
Sounds good to me!
He's winning his shift!
Hey!
They're out in the bar getting beers!
I mean beers!
Get beers!
Remember the Bronx Tale?
When the bikers walk in?
And finally, like they're acting like jerks.
And then the mob guy comes in and he's like, hey, we're just looking for a few beers, a few beers.
And the mob, I forget the guy's name.
He's played by Chaz, Chaz Palminteri, right?
And he's like, all right, you gentlemen, give him a couple beers.
So the biker guy goes, let's get some beers.
Let's get some beers here.
Let's get some beers.
In that distinct accent, let's get some beers.
This is Ryan and Shifty at the bar now.
Shifty, let's get some beers.
Let's get some beers here.
Are these guys in cahoots?
It is just so obvious an abomination of justice, so obviously wrong, that I cannot explain to you with a straight face because I like Paul Ryan.
I don't know Gowdy, but I did have a conversation with Ryan.
He was a gentleman.
I don't know what's in his head.
I don't know what they're thinking.
The facts are open in the public sphere.
This is not hard to figure out.
Before I move on to the Awan brothers and how this can, I'm going to make a connection here that's going to drive you crazy.
Maybe the difference between me and a lot of these guys who happen to be lawyers and politicians is that I've actually worked these cases and I'm not trying to be, you know, like some, some arbiter of absolute truth here.
I get it.
There's a matter, there's a subjectivity interpretation.
I understand that.
Facts are facts, but the way you can interpret facts are different.
I mean, that's the whole essence of foreign policy, right?
I mean, the facts on the ground that the North Koreans destroyed a nuclear facility, which they did, are interpreted two different ways.
Doesn't mean the facts are wrong.
Some say, oh, it's evidence of their commitment to destroy the nuclear program.
Other people say, ah, that's BS.
They're just destroying it, you know, because it was already collapsing anyway.
Facts like 2 plus 2 equals 4 are not interpretable, right?
Facts like this, there is some kind of subjective angle to take that fact and run with it.
I get that.
I understand that.
But what I'm suggesting to you is there are basic things in this case that maybe you should rely on the experience of some people who've actually been in the space and say, guys, listen, I've actually investigated criminal cases.
Others have as well.
You know, Joe DiGenova being one of them as well.
They have a real problem with what happened here.
For you to come out and make these bold statements, the FBI didn't do anything wrong, and by the way, they weren't investigating the Trump team, is just illogical.
Now making this even worse, Joe, and I'm calling for action here for Paul Ryan, because Paul Ryan seems now to be fine with spying and police state tactics, which I just don't get, I don't understand.
If you're okay now with the insertion of FBI informants, spies, Into political campaigns, which, make no mistake, that's what, according to the New York Times themselves, Halper tried to do.
Nobody's disputing there was an FBI spy.
You can dispute the language all you want.
Listen to me.
Don't care one bit.
I give exactly zero mm about what you think about the euphemisms, okay?
Zero.
The guy was a spy.
He was trying to obtain information.
I don't care.
You call him whatever you want.
An informant, human resource personnel, an undocumented FBI asset.
I don't care.
The guy was a spy and you're an idiot.
Okay?
Period.
Thank you.
If Paul Ryan is seemingly okay with spies being inserted into political spaces now to target the political opposition, Joe, aren't you a little curious why he's not okay with inserting a spy, a human resource, FBI asset, an undocumented FBI informant into the Debbie Wasserman Schultz campaign?
Oh, yeah.
Why not, right?
I mean, hey, it's okay for Trump.
It's cool.
You had no evidence whatsoever that Trump, the credible probable cause that Trump's team was colluding with the Russians.
You don't even have evidence the DNC was hacked!
The whole DNC hack story that the Russians stole the emails from the DNC.
You don't even have evidence of that!
The FBI never analyzed the computer!
But you're A-OK with spying on the Trump team.
Yet, everybody's seemingly quiet about this absolutely exploding scandal.
Luke Rosiak at The Daily Caller, big-time hat tip to him.
Him and Chuck Ross at The Daily Caller.
And I know they're doing real, real good quality journalism here.
You know why?
Because that goofball Seth Abramson, that joke of a Twitter guy I follow for a good laugh, is now attacking The Daily Caller.
That's how you know when you're over the target show.
You get leftist goons like Abramson, who is clueless, attacking them.
Rosiak has been exposing this Awan Brothers scandal in the House, the Democrats in the House, forever now, and the media, Joe, nowhere to be found.
Where's the spy?
All right, I'm going to get to this in a second, because this is important.
Let me just knock this out.
But this is a critical story, and I want to read to you an op-ed by a guy named Minotaur from Fox News Opinion.
It'll be up at my website, Bongino.com, and subscribe to my email list.
I'll email it to you.
The op-ed on the Swan Brothers case is staggering.
All right, today's show also brought to you by...
Our buddies, one of our faves, we the people holsters, they sent me one of their holsters.
It is awesome.
Democrats are up in arms over the NRA's rating of gubernatorial candidates.
But I couldn't be in more agreement with the grading system.
The Republican candidates in Nevada have a proven track record.
They have our track record of supporting the Second Amendment, which is no doubt why they received an A+.
Don't just choose a candidate who supports your rights.
Buy a company who supports them as well.
I don't write this for them.
This is what I wanted to show.
This company, they mean it, man.
We the People holsters was founded in the state of Nevada, and let me tell you, they nailed down their holster designs.
We the People holsters are custom-made holsters made in the USA.
Made in the USA!
They design their own holsters in-house.
What does that mean?
They don't use third-party molds for their holsters.
They design them right here in Las Vegas.
They cut every mold to fit each gun perfectly.
I know I have one.
You get that click sound when you put it in there.
It's great.
They update their designs.
They update their designs.
They add new designs every month.
That keeps them up to date on new designs and models that comes out.
So when they say they design their holsters, they mean it.
They build them in-house using their own molds with a 3D design team that measures every micro millery of the gun for the perfect fit.
Click.
You hear that click?
I like that.
Adjustable cant.
Has an adjustable ride on it.
They designed their own clip on the holster, right?
They have four holes on the clip that match up with the four on the holster.
So you can not only adjust the cant, but the ride as well, for maximum comfort.
It's a really, really wonderful holster.
I love it.
Adjustable tension as well.
Each holster will have that click sound, lets you know it's clicked in place.
If you ever want more tension, just tighten the screw.
It's that simple and you're done.
The custom designs are printed in-house.
They have thin blue lines, thin red lines, constitution, camo, an American flag, and more coming out each month.
Their holsters start at just $34.
Every holster comes with a lifetime guarantee.
Every holster ships free!
Free!
Gratis!
If it's not a perfect fit, send it back for a refund.
WeThePeopleHolsters.com.
Go to WeThePeopleHolsters.com slash Dan, if you want to give us credit.
WeThePeopleHolsters.com slash Dan.
WeThePeopleHolsters.com slash Dan.
Listeners of my show, The Dan Bongino Show, use code Dan and you'll get $10 off.
It's just $24 for this holster with free shipping.
You'll love it.
WeThePeopleHolsters.com slash Dan.
Promo code Dan.
Okay.
So again, if he's comfortable, Ryan, with spying and doesn't think the FBI did anything wrong, as he agreed with Trey Gowdy, who was grotesquely misguided, then why not insert a spy into... By the way, let me just be clear on this.
I'm not suggesting this.
Unlike Gowdy and Ryan and these other guys, I have been entirely consistent in my battle forever against big government tactics used against Democrats or Republicans.
I'm simply asking the question that Paul Ryan, who is the Speaker of the House, Who presently controls the speaker that speaks for the House of Representatives.
If he is A-OK with the use of government informants and spies to infiltrate political campaigns to get information, then why has he not employed a spy or asked the FBI or done something to get a spy into the Debbie Wasserman Schultz campaign?
I don't recommend that!
I don't believe in police statism.
Apparently they do!
Now, what's going on with the Sir Juan Brothers case?
Let me read to you.
By the way, there's a plea scheduled July 3rd in this case.
After that plea, we are gonna know a whole lot more because it's clear they're letting him plea in exchange for information.
What happened?
I'm gonna read for you from this op-ed in Fox, a paragraph or two.
This is the biggest... You know what?
After Spygate, it's the second biggest scandal going on right now.
But the fact that the media is covering this up is abhorrent.
From the piece.
The House Office of Inspector General, Joe, tracked the Iwans' network usage.
You know what?
Let me just set this up.
I'm sorry.
Let me just back up a second.
The Iwans were hired, the Iwan brothers, Pakistani brothers, were hired by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democrat, who was in charge of the DNC.
She is a congresswoman from down here in Florida.
She's horrible.
She's almost as bad as Swalwell.
They were also hired by 40 other Democrat members of Congress, these two Pakistani brothers, without going through a background check.
They had access to all of their emails, their schedules, and their sensitive data.
Now, let me read to you this paragraph, and your jaw's gonna drop.
The Office of Inspector General in the House tracked the Awans network usage, Joe, and found that a massive amount of data was flowing from the congressional networks.
From!
From!
Meaning they were taking it out, said Rep.
Scott Perry from Pennsylvania.
This is incredible.
Over 5,700 logins by the five Awan Associates were discovered on a single server within the House.
The server of Democratic Caucus Chairman, then Rep.
Xavier Becerra of California.
Up to 40 or more members of Congress.
This is incredible.
Had all of their data moved out of the office servers and onto the Becerra server without their knowledge of consent.
By the way, he's the Attorney General of California right now.
He left his congressional seat, Becerra.
Before Becerra left Congress in 2017, January, the Capitol Police wanted a copy of the caucus server's contents because all the data was moved onto it.
Becerra presumably told Awan that Capitol Police wanted a copy of the server.
What is known, Joe, is that Awan did produce a copy of the server's data for the Capitol Police.
All right, okay, okay, right?
No, it goes on.
However, after taking a look at the data they were provided, Capitol Police determined they were given a copy of data from some other server instead.
Oh my gosh.
Pauly!
Pauly Boombatz, where are you, buddy?
Where's the speaker?
This is your, this is your, you're the speaker of the house, right?
You can order all kinds of stuff.
Where's the spy?
Well, you can't order a spy in this case, but where is, FBI, where are you guys?
Are you running a spy against this?
Do you have a spy with these 40 members of Congress to try to determine if this information's in the hands of Pakistani government officials?
How do we know where the Iwan brothers are, what they did with the data?
Folks, these people were arrested.
There's a federal case, there's a plea coming up July 3rd.
Oh boy, get ready for that one.
You think they're playing out this case for nothing?
Supposedly, according to the Fox News piece, some of the charges in the case are just charges to keep them in the system.
Now, let me explain to you what that means.
When you work as a federal agent, you may have Joe Armacost on felonious mopery, jaywalking, bank fraud, credit card fraud, tow missile sales, whatever it may be.
You know, ITAR violations.
Yeah, I may have Joe on ten different things.
This is how the federal system works.
Pay close attention to this.
If I want Joe to cooperate, and the prosecution of Joe is not my immediate goal.
Why?
Because I want Joe to give up who he sold the TOW missiles to.
That's important.
We have TOW missiles, we have nuclear codes given to someone else.
I need Joe to cooperate.
Why would it be in my best interest not to charge Joe with everything right out of the chute?
Well, because one, it gives you more ammunition later.
Okay, Joe, you don't want to plead to this money laundering charge and cooperate?
Now we're going to throw on arms trafficking and drug dealing and all of a sudden your lawyer's like, Joe, man, you went from 10 years to 20 years to life in prison like that.
Oh no, Saul, you jerk.
You're tearing my a** up here.
You remember that?
You better bleep that part.
I will bleep that.
No!
But it was funny.
That is the jerky voice.
They do that all the time.
Bring your glasses and your shoes.
Another reason, not just because you need additional, that was funny, need additional ammo to throw at Joe to get him to cooperate, is you may in turn dismiss the charges later.
Folks, I'm not getting too wonky.
I want you to understand what's going on here, why this July 3rd deal is going to be a big deal.
If I charge you via a complaint, I bring a complaint to court.
What they didn't do with Papadopoulos, they made a PC arrest, which is very unusual.
Most federal arrests happen via complaint.
I bring a complaint to court that says what Joe did.
I'm complaining, essentially.
Hey, judge, here's what Joe did.
I'm federal agent so-and-so.
Judge reads it, goes, yeah, there's probable cause there, meaning a probable cause that Joe committed the crime.
And as it's described, I get an arrest warrant.
That complaint is relatively easy to dismiss later.
Meaning if they want to let Joe off completely and dismiss the complaint, fine.
If they want to dismiss that charge and charge him with lesser crime, fine.
So typically you'll only charge one or two things.
You won't throw the kitchen sink at them.
That's important.
If I indict them, it is very difficult, and most of the federal agents out there listening will know what I mean.
If we indict them at a grand jury, a true bill's issued, an arrest warrant's issued afterwards, it's very difficult to scrap indictments.
It's not easy.
So the complaint process is generally preferable.
There's timelines for each.
The fact that there was, in this case, a low-level charge issued, right?
That low-level charge was designed to keep them in the system.
And they're getting ready to plea, these brothers, on July 3rd.
Says to me that they have a whole mmm-load of information.
Get it?
Who were they giving this information?
They stole from 40 members of the United States House of Representatives.
Who?
40 or more members?
One of them's the current California Attorney General who had the stolen information stored on his server?
Oh, and by the way, they gave a fake server to the Capitol Police?
Sounds like trouble!
Oh, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz was what?
Oh, she was running the DNC around the same time that Pakistani brothers were offloading, Joe, quote, massive amounts of data from the congressional networks.
Oh, and they had logins to Debbie Wasserman Schultz iPad of the DNC issued iPad.
Oh.
Oh.
Maybe, just maybe this whole the Russians hacked the DNC story and worked with Trump, you think maybe this story could quite possibly be cover for something else?
Now I, right?
I know.
Yeah.
Joe's giving me the look, like this is ridiculous.
Whoa.
He's giving me the looksie.
Folks, where's Paul Ryan on this one?
He's A-OK with spies infiltrating the Trump team.
And by the way, I will stick to this story because I'm absolutely confident who I got it from.
We are not done with the assets used to penetrate the Trump team.
Don't think for a second there was just one.
Where are the spies in the Blasham and Schultz team?
I Again, for the Media Matters goons listening to the show, I am not calling for that.
I'm not a police state tyrant.
You are.
You have no problem now whatsoever with the use of spies.
You think it's no big deal?
It was a low-level, low-impact way.
It was the implementation of a human asset?
A spy into a political campaign?
You think that's no big deal?
An American citizen being spied on by a FISA court?
Interacting with an FBI spy while working for a political campaign?
Why are you not calling for a spy to get to the bottom of this, you police state jackbooted thug tyrants?
Because you're frauds, that's why.
Because you're liars.
And the media bootlicking tyrants in the media who are covering for this, you disgust me too.
Because you have the opportunity here to blow the doors off two scandals that make Watergate look like Romper Room and you're sitting on your collective asses doing absolutely nothing while the biggest police state scandal in American history unfolds before of your blind Oedipus Rex eyes.
Give me the spikes!
You fools.
You complete fools.
You jokes.
Now, I want to get to Swalwell, because this is important, too.
This guy, who is single-handedly committed to the destruction of the Republic.
Let me get to my final read here.
It's important.
They pay for the show.
We love our sponsors, and we appreciate their time and their efforts to keep this show free for you.
Filterbuy!
You got air filters, right?
I hope you're buying them for a company that supports the cause.
Not only that, a company makes their products here in the USA, and a company that makes high-quality, the best air filters around.
I don't want to assume too much, but I suspect you have enough bills to pay already and you don't need more.
But that might be what you're headed for if you don't trust me on this.
According to the Department of Energy, the most expensive utility for most Americans is their electricity bill, making up roughly 9% of their annual housing expenditure.
That's a lot.
This number is aggravated depending on where you live.
Take Florida, for example, where I live, where your electric bill in the summer is pretty ridiculous.
You know, FPL does a good job, but Florida is a lot of money, especially if your system's not running right.
It's even more.
Adding insult to injury, this allergy season has been one of the worst further straining your system and your lungs.
You can help lower this electricity bill by making sure your system is running smoothly and efficiently with a new set of filters from my friends at FilterBuy, America's leading provider of HVAC filters for both homes and small businesses.
They carry over 600 different filter sizes.
And if you're one of those difficult people, they can make custom filters just for you.
They ship free within 24 hours.
And if that isn't enough, they're manufactured right here in America.
So there's no excuse.
Set up auto delivery.
Just makes life easier.
You don't have to worry about it.
Plus you save an additional 5%.
You'll extend the life of your system, keep the air clean in your house, keep your lungs clean.
It's getting hotter outside.
The last thing you need is a busted HVAC system on top of the allergies.
Save time, save money, breathe better with filterbuy.com.
Tell them that Dan Bongino's show sent you, and we'll be very happy to take credit for sending them your way, because it's a great company.
We love them, and we know you have air filters, and we know you have lungs.
So there you go.
We love FilterPi.com.
Okay.
Let's get to Swalwell.
Police state timer, Derek Swalwell.
So he was on Tucker last night in another infuriating appearance.
And listen, if Eric Swalwell takes pride in getting underneath my skin and people who support the Constitution and the lover of liberty and freedoms and limited government, you win.
You do get under my skin.
Because I can't stand tyranny and you in fact are a police state tyrant that supports police state thuggery.
This is a cut from Democrat congressman, a police state tyrant, in case I haven't said that enough.
Democrat congressman from California, Eric Swalwell, armed with Tucker Carlson last night, making a fool out of himself again.
Why is it okay for an administration to hire an informant to spy on a rival political campaign without telling them?
Why is that okay?
Are you comfortable with that?
Well, that's not what happened.
And actually, we learned today that every person who's been briefed on this, except Chairman Nunes, now says that the president's account of this, that a spy was put in his campaign, It's just not true.
No, no, I know that there's a lot of lying about it, but I'm not those people.
I'm not the president.
Here's what I read in the New York Times and what I think has never been contested, that the Obama administration paid an informant to spy on the Trump campaign and then pass that information back to the Obama administration and never told the Trump campaign.
Is that incorrect?
What am I missing?
Yeah, well, Tucker, I'm not going to go into classified information.
I'll tell you that.
No, that's not classified.
That's New York Times.
Nobody has said that's untrue.
Are you saying that's untrue?
I'm saying that informants are commonly used in a lot of cases to help us catch bad guys.
If it was used here, from the evidence I have seen, that would have been appropriate.
No, but you just said... From the evidence I have seen, from the FISA applications I've reviewed, and the witnesses we've interviewed, we would want to know everything about how close the Trumps are getting to the Russians.
And yes, through informants.
Yes.
Is this guy unbelievable?
Police state tyrant Eric Swalwell, Democrat congressman from California.
He says, well, that's not what happened about the spy.
And then Tucker says, what do you mean it's not what happened?
The New York Times reported it, ladies and gentlemen.
It's open so you can read it yourself.
The New York Times has yet to retract the story.
So what does he say?
I'm not going to go into classified information.
It's not classified, you chucklehead!
It's in the New York Times!
Do you read the paper?
The Slimes, a left-leaning outlet, has already reported on the use of a government asset to spy on the Trump team.
Did you miss that?
I'm not going to report on classified information.
Are you crazy?
Then he says at the end, well I support that you get to the bottom of all this.
Not with the Iwan brothers!
You're not even remotely interested in... Why not?
Again, Swalwell, let's get you on the record.
Why not employ government informants, spies, undocumented FBI assets, whatever the hell you want to call them.
To go infiltrate that.
Why not support that?
Infiltrate the house right now and get to the bottom of how much the Pakistanis know about the business of the 40 members of Congress who had their data exported en masse from the Congress by two Pakistani brothers who were never background checked.
Why not?
I don't support it.
I assume you do.
You just said you want to get to the bottom of stuff.
Because you're a fraud.
You're a fake.
Play cut number two, Joe.
This gets worse.
This guy is just an abomination to Congress.
I just stated what I think are facts.
You conceded they're facts.
And yet, that's not spying.
How is that not spying?
Spying is what you do against an enemy, right?
Well, first of all, that's what spying is.
Spying is what you do.
You can spy on people you love.
You can spy on your own children.
It doesn't need to be an enemy.
You're expanding the definition into some made-up land.
Why is that not spying?
If I am watching you without your knowledge, gathering information on you without your knowledge, don't tell you about it, I'm spying on you.
But if a candidate for the highest office in the land is drawing himself, his family, his businesses to a foreign adversary, wouldn't we want our government to do everything we can to know what they're doing and then hopefully try and stop that adversary?
Okay, but just one thing at a time.
Well, you can see that's spying.
No.
It's not spying.
You're generally gathering information on someone, but it's not spying.
Folks, you know what?
Let me give Swalwell credit for a second.
He finally said something that's true.
Remember, he's a police state tyrant, so Swalwell, Democrat congressman from California, police stater, he says, no, no, spying is something we do on the enemy.
He's right!
How's he right, Joe?
Trump was his enemy!
You're absolutely right!
Spying is something we do on the enemy.
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and everybody else involved in this operation perceived Trump as the enemy.
How do we know that?
We can read the text!
You are right, Swalwell.
He was the enemy.
The enemy of you.
You're the enemy of the American people.
By using police state tactics to infiltrate the networks of your political opponents.
And then supporting it.
But Trump was the enemy.
To you.
Then he says, by the way, if there's a foreign adversary trying to get information on us, wait, what?
We have two Pakistani brothers who just offloaded tons of information off 40 members of your caucus in the House of Representatives and I hear not a peep, not a scintilla of information outside of the Daily Caller and on Fox News about this case.
You big fraud!
You suck!
Yes!
You do!
On the record today, get Swalwell on the record today about how he feels about using the FBI to infiltrate via spies the members of the House of Representatives teams to get the information about how much they knew and when they knew it about the Pakistanis trying to obtain the information.
Just be consistent!
If you're going to advocate for police state thuggery, Advocate for showing up at people's houses to confiscate their guns under threat of arrest?
Advocate for spying on the Trump team like he does all the time?
Then just be consistent about it!
This guy is a total fraud.
And one other thing, I don't have the cut on this, but he said in a prior appearance, I want to debunk another one of Swalwell's absolutely stupid statements.
And he's good at this.
His success rate of stupidity is 100%.
It's true.
He keeps saying about the FISA warrant, well, one in front of a judge would probably cause, oh my gosh, this guy can't be this dumb.
Joe, if you're a judge in a court, You are, just to be clear, Joe, you are not a federal investigator, right?
You never have been, and you've never been a judge, and you're not a lawyer.
No.
So this is just, I say this because this doesn't require any of that.
It only requires common sense.
If you're a judge in a FISA court, Joe, you are not an investigator.
No.
You are not on the ground doing, you're not Judge Dredd, you're not out there in the field, you're a judge jury executioner.
You're just a judge.
Yeah.
You're presented with a series of facts from who?
An investigator in the Federal Bureau of Investigation or someone else in the government, Secret Service, DEA, ATF, whatever.
Yes.
Joe, I'm not setting you up here.
Just ask me.
It's not any common sense.
Why do you think the court, the judge, and they demand the federal agent raise his right hand and swear to the facts.
Why do you think they do that?
They'd like him to tell the truth.
They'd like him to tell the truth!
Why?
Why does it matter?
Why does the truth in front of the judge matter?
You gotta make decisions based on the truth.
But Joe, why doesn't the judge just go out and investigate it himself?
He's not an investigator, Dan!
He's not an investigator!
He's not an investigator!
Oh my gosh, is Swalwell this stupid?
The judge is relying on a series of facts the FBI and the FISA court swore to.
If the facts are wrong because they were based on a crap dossier, a crap dossier put together by a British agent who didn't even get the information himself, then the judge was misled!
Swalwell going in front of the cameras and humiliating himself, the country, the Congress, and the cause every single time they say, well a judge signed off on the warrant clearly shows he's either incredibly stupid as to how this goes or he's a manipulative police state tyrant.
There's no third option.
Is he this stupid?
The facts they present to the judge, you swear to them being true.
Yeah!
When they're not true, it's not the judge's fault.
He's not Judge Dredd.
He's assuming what you're telling him as Joe, with zero experience in this space at all, just figured out in two seconds.
He's basing his opinion on a set of what he thinks are facts.
When they turn out to be non-facts, in other words, bull...
Then there's a problem.
Swalwell doesn't care about the problem.
Because he supports the police state.
Same guy, by the way.
Same guy.
Same guy.
Quote Bill Clinton on the golf course.
Same guy.
Same guy who wants the cops to come to your house and lock you up if you don't surrender your guns.
Same guy.
This is, by the way, for all you young kids out there, this is your Democrat party.
For all you 18 to 24 year olds who've been somehow misled by hack college professors, journalism folks, and humanities people telling you that the Democrats, they're the party of freedom, and the little guy, and opportunity.
Bull...
They are not the part, they are the, these are police state tyrants, nothing more.
They want your money, they want your healthcare, they spy on people, they want to kick in your door if you don't surrender your guns.
This is the party of the little guy?
Are you serious?
Are you on drugs?
Listen, dude, put down the carnation instant breakfast mixed with the psychedelic mushrooms in your dorm room and I'm sorry, man.
Wake up and as we said last week, go get a mop and go to work because college is doing you a disservice, brother and sister.
You are being misled.
If you believe for a second that these liberals, oh man, they're the party of liberty, we're fighting the man.
Dude, you're the man now.
You're the man.
We're fighting the man, brother!
The man!
Pass the bong, brother!
You are the man!
You're the man!
You want people's money?
You want their health care?
You want their kids?
You want to spy on them?
You're the man!
You, dude!
You're the man!
Cut the crap.
Cut the BS.
Cut the nonsense that you're so cool and you're woke.
Everything's woke now.
You're not woke.
You're asleep.
You're asleep, man.
You are out.
You are in REM sleep right now.
While your government is steamrollin' your ass.
Fightin' in bed, brother.
Pass the bong.
Oh, stupid.
I'm sorry.
You're an idiot.
Dope.
Fight the man.
Morons.
And listen, don't think for a second if you're listening to this, I'm some bi- This whole show has been dedicated to attacking two silly Republicans who don't know their asses from their elbows.
So don't tell me, oh, you're just a big Republican.
I'm not- I don't even like the Republican Party anymore.
I'm dead serious.
If it wasn't for the ability to vote in a primary, I would deregister from either platform.
Because 90% of the Republican Party is full of hack sellouts too.
But you telling me that these Democrats are, we're fighting a man to cause a, give me a break man.
Tell your story walking because you are just an idiot.
On mental steroids.
That, I mean, you are being fed so much garbage that you just wolf down like the cookie monster.
It's pathetic to watch.
I'm sorry for the rant, folks, but this is really, really, we are at, we're in such a dangerous time in American history where so many stupid people are influenced by even dumber people in the media, and even dumber people in the Congress, and in the Democrat Party, and the Republicans as well, Gowdy and Ryan included right now, that I can't believe how many seemingly intelligent folks suck this stuff up.
Oh, it's so good!
Big government tyranny, isn't it delicious?
Imbeciles.
I'm telling you, I had a sticker on my car growing up, question authority.
I never forgot that.
They don't question it.
You surgically attacked your lips to the ass of it now.
This is what's cool.
Can you sew my lips to the ass of big government, please?
Republicans, Democrats, they're all swamp goons.
Every one of them.
The FBI did everything by the book.
Everything by the book.
Yeah, really?
Really?
They went up in court, lied in front of a judge?
To spy on a guy, member of a political campaign?
To jump into the campaign and steal the remails?
Yeah, sounds like the... What book is that?
You dopes?
The X-Men?
183?
What the hell planet are you from?
Oh my gosh.
Dude.
All right, I do got a couple news stories.
Sorry, I gotta move on.
I spent more time on that, as always, than I intended.
I have another great story, by the way.
Read that Fox News piece, Bongino.com.
Also subscribe to my email list.
I'll send it to you.
I have another great piece, The American Thinker.
I can't get this.
Maybe I'll get to it on Levin tonight, or on the show tomorrow.
Another story that's been left by the wayside, Samantha Power.
Samantha Power, Obama's UN ambassador.
Ambassador of the UN.
Remember, she unmasked Gave authority to spy on the conversations of Americans 260 times in the election year.
Samantha Power's story is still yet untold.
She told Congress, oh it wasn't me, someone did it in my name.
Is anybody curious about this?
Anybody?
That's gotten lost in the whole Spygate story.
So the UN, not an intelligence asset, a diplomat, Barack Obama, his ambassador to the UN, is now essentially spying on people too.
And nobody's curious about that story.
It's completely left, but no one's even curious in the media.
Someone's lying, by the way, Joe.
She said, oh, it wasn't me.
Someone did it my name.
Well, who was it then?
No one in the media is curious.
Nobody.
Read that story from American Thinker.
It's very good.
A couple more stories.
One quick on the economy.
I hate to give you bad news, but again, on this show, we do the facts.
We don't, you know, this isn't a propaganda outlet, okay?
The economy's doing well.
Unemployment's great.
Labor force participation's doing a little better, although we still have a lot of people on the sidelines.
But overall, a story in Drudge today, Warren Buffett, who is, you know, by no means a conservative, has said, listen, we're in the sixth inning of this thing, and our sluggers are coming up.
In other words, this economy's still got a lot of wind ahead of it, okay?
To push this sales.
A little bit of bad news.
They revised the productivity numbers down for last year to 1.3%.
Now, folks, productivity matters.
I'm not going to get into a long economic treatise here, but remember, the entire essence of our wealth is productivity.
What we produce.
It's as simple as that.
The reason the United States is wealthier than, you know, Accra, Ghana, is we have flat screens and cable boxes and computers and contact lenses and medicine because we do what?
We produce them, or we produce other things to buy them in an exchange, in effectively barter or international trade.
Productivity is everything.
Listen to me, folks.
This is important.
In economics, it is not something.
Productivity is everything.
You're not wealthy if you don't produce stuff.
We're not liberals.
We measure wealth by our emotional well-being.
No, that's liberal idiocy.
We measure wealth by stuff you have and other people don't.
Thank you.
Period.
Again, full stop.
The productivity numbers were revised down to 1.3.
Now putting that in context, post-World War II, the average Has been 2%.
So we're still significantly below the average.
The average in the Obama years, about 1.2, 1.1.
So we're a little better.
That's a little bit of bad news.
The good news on that, this is in the Wall Street Journal today by the way, the revisions to the productivity numbers.
The good news is investment is moving up dramatically, capital investment, investment in factories.
Why does that matter to you?
Because the ability to produce stuff is measured typically by how much investment we put into factories and services that do what?
Produce stuff.
So if you have a machine that's producing 80 t-shirts an hour, and it's older, and you spend 100k on a new machine that produces 120, that's 40 more t-shirts.
That's more stuff, which makes it cheaper, which makes the wages of the employees go up because, Joe, they're producing more stuff, which the t-shirt factory can sell Can sell more stuff and pay their employees better.
Productivity matters.
So the bad news is it was revised down a little bit.
Still not a great number.
The good news is with investment picking up, I expect that number.
And, you know, here's what's today's date.
Today's date is Thursday, January 7th.
It is now 11 p.m.
a.m.
Eastern.
I expect by the end of next year we can timestamp this that you will see productivity close to 2%.
So, bad news, good news.
But I do like to put out the economic facts.
One more story here.
There's a really good story in the Wall Street Journal today by Dan Henninger and it's terrific and he talks about how The media's flippin' out.
The media's flippin' out because Trump, is what I addressed yesterday, Joe, can seemingly turn any negative story into a positive and has absolutely mastered the art of trolling the left and getting them to respond.
I've said repeatedly that the gift of Donald Trump is the media hates him so much that the left is willing to finally admit who they are.
The left has hid that fact for a long time.
The left has hid the fact that they're big, huge, they don't run on this.
Now, everybody knows they're big taxers, big staters, but when Democrats run for office, you rarely see that on a campaign sign.
Send me a picture of a campaign sign you've seen by a Democrat.
Democrat Joey Bagadonas, raising your taxes every day, then with a big thumbs up.
Yeah, baby!
You don't see it.
They hide their agenda.
Trump has infuriated the left and the media, it's the same thing, so much, that this is the first time they've shown their butts.
Defending Hamas, defending MS-13, because they just want to do something to get back at Trump because they can't control themselves.
You understand what I'm saying?
Yeah.
Their animosity towards Bush, their animosity towards Reagan was palpable, but they understood tactically the need to control their responses.
And they did it tactically with Bush using Iraq against them.
They can't control themselves with Trump.
They're children.
So what do they do?
Trump says MS-13 are animals.
An obvious point to any reasonable person, Joe.
The media, we gotta get this SOB.
MS-13!
Darnell, you can't talk about them like that!
This is the gift of Donald Trump.
He can turn any seemingly negative comment into a positive.
Henninger's piece references what I was talking about yesterday with the Eagles.
How this would, Joe, this would look like a negative to any other person.
Here's the headline for anyone else.
Well, you know what?
This is the headline for everyone, but how they deal with the headline be different.
The headline be Trump dissed at the White House by Eagles.
What does Trump do?
He turns it around again, makes the event about American patriotism, highlights the fact that the Eagles tried to do a flipperoo on him.
They sent 80 names and only five people were going to show up from the team and a mascot.
And he turns the event into making the Eagles look like complete, utter idiots.
It's just the guy has a gift, and when I grew up in Queens, I used to joke around called the Dipsy Do Flipperoo.
Now the Dipsy Do Flipperoo...
It's not a joke.
I used to use this term.
Well, it was a joke, but I really did use this term.
Remember when you were dating that girl, Joe, and you, you, you know, you liked her, but you weren't really totally into it.
Yeah.
So you break up and she starts dating someone else, you know, and all of a sudden you're in love.
Ah, yeah.
You know that feeling, right?
Everybody wants what they can't have.
Right.
I used to call that the dipsy do flipperoo, where they, they flip, they flip you.
They flip.
What was it?
The usual suspects.
Benicio del Toro.
They flip.
They flip you like this.
They flip you.
They flip you.
The Dipsy-Doo Flipperoo is real.
This is Trump.
He does the Dipsy-Doo Flipperoo all the time.
The media comes out.
Trump dissed at the White House.
Trump comes out with a tweet.
Kick them damn eagles out of here.
They don't want to show up for the national anthem.
Everybody should stand for that.
All of a sudden the story turns into Trump.
And the media is pulling their hair out every day like, why can't we beat this guy?
And in the Henninger piece, he makes the point, Joe, that Democrats are now openly whining that Trump's messaging apparatus and skills here are so powerful, whether you like them or not, that they can't get a message out.
They are constantly on the defensive with Trump.
They can't get anything out.
Here's our plan on the economy.
Nothing!
Because they're constantly responding to Trump.
And I say, Amen!
Amen to you media hacks who thought you would own the keys to the kingdom.
You thought you'd be the gatekeepers to acceptable public opinion forever.
Nyet!
Nyet!
In Russian.
I'm trolling you now too.
Nyet!
It's done.
It's over.
Trump has figured out the recipe.
Taking your stories, rolling them in a ball, and jamming them right up your caboose and using them against you.
How does that feel?
How do you like them melons?
I don't like it, Dan.
You don't like that at all, Saul, do you?
Of course you don't.
And now they're whining just like Saul.
We can't get our message out.
Maybe if you'd shut up for a minute and stop trying to make every single story out there about Donald Trump.
Donald Trump wears pajamas when he watches Fox News and they're green!
Maybe if you stopped doing that, he'd stop feeling the need to ram that story right up your butts and make you look like idiots the next day.
Just a hint, media goons.
I'm not saying, I'm just saying.
Oh, boy.
Hey, thanks again, folks.
I really appreciate it.
Make sure you check out tomorrow's show.
Check me out on Mark Levin tonight, too.
I'll be on at 6 o'clock Eastern, filling in for The Great One.
I'll see you all tomorrow.
You just heard The Dan Bongino Show.
Get more of Dan online anytime at conservativereview.com.
You can also get Dan's podcasts on iTunes or SoundCloud.
