Tim Pool exposes alleged Democrat strategist James Carville's plan for post-2026 one-party rule via Puerto Rico and D.C. statehood, a 13-justice Supreme Court, and mass amnesty. He contrasts this with GOP tactics, citing NYC Mayor Zorah Mamdani's defiance of federal deportations and California's "Stop Nick Shirley Act." Pool argues geographic hyperpolarization drives radical leftist policies, noting prediction markets favor Democrats in 2028 while questioning 2020 election integrity. Ultimately, the conflict represents an irreconcilable clash between a multicultural democracy worldview and a constitutional republic foundation regarding borders and values. [Automatically generated summary]
Liberal commentators keep claiming that Democrats are weak and won't actually do anything about the Republican Party.
Despite the fact that Donald Trump has been taken to court, his home was raided, his lawyers arrested, it is clear that Democrats intend to exert their power when they can.
And James Carville is quietly telling Democrats it is on.
You can't just say you'll do things, you must do it.
And he is calling for Democrats to pack the courts, give statehood to Puerto Rico and D.C., and shut down.
Output transcript Out the Republican Party forever creating the United States of one party rule.
Which would be a massive mistake.
But I understand Republicans are arguing similarly at the ground level.
It's not necessarily true that the Republican politicians are doing anything.
We don't actually know if Democrats would do anything, but we know that some of them will as they have.
Certainly there are culture warriors on both sides, but it would seem to me that at least at the state and local level, Democrats are much more willing to exert power over the right.
Than the right is willing to do in turn.
And thus, this could actually come to pass.
And unfortunately, I got to tell you guys, I don't think there's any real path out of this.
There is no off ramp.
And while, for the most part, the latest polling shows that Americans aren't too concerned about civil war, they are concerned about the end of democracy in the United States.
And I think it's fair to say that both Republicans and Democrats largely agree that it's not so much about the idea of democracy, but that there will not be an opportunity to have a regius of grievances.
or your voice to be heard, regardless of which side of this culture war you find yourselves on.
Now, I'd argue if the Republicans win, you're not going to get much.
Cultural victories, yes, but those were coming during the Biden administration.
Now that Trump is in, we're not really seeing those tremendous cultural victories.
In fact, it seems like woke and the left are starting to have a resurgence.
In which case, my friends, I'd argue the Democrats are about to have a major, major comeback.
And it's going to be bad no matter what.
The truth is, there's no off ramp.
Democrats are not going to accept the Republican worldview.
Republicans aren't going to accept the Democrat worldview.
And the truth is, it's not even about party.
It is the multicultural democracy versus the constitutional republic of the United States.
There are those that believe in the traditional moral foundations, despite some progress.
Traditional moral foundations, usually meaning constitutional ideas as held by the founders.
Not all of them, because we have progressed.
But the multicultural democracy side says open the borders, let everybody be legal.
Let's just change everything.
In fact, one video I saw showed them singing the star spangled banner to a pride flag instead of the American flag.
Yes, two distinct worldviews cannot coexist in the same space.
And if James Carville is right and Democrats do what he says, there will never be a Republican government in this country again.
I'll pause right now and say, I mean, there will be.
But the joke is that in 15 years, the Republican Party will be gay communists and the Democratic Party will just be AI.
And what we view as traditional conservatism won't exist because that's the trend we've seen for the past hundred years.
Republicans being completely unwilling to exert a power will ultimately just go by the wayside.
Now, to be fair, I'll throw into the mix that Republicans tend to have more kids than Democrats, so I don't see how they ultimately keep their ideas going.
But then again, Muslims have more kids than traditional conservatives, so maybe, as some argued, the world just becomes Islamic because at least they're having children.
Conservatives have a lot of kids, don't get me wrong, but even among conservatives, they are below replacement fertility.
So let's just say it's going to get weird, especially with the advent of AI.
We'll see how things play out.
But first, let's take a look at what James Carville is saying and the latest developments and what's going on in terms of democracy and what people think.
James Garville suggested on Thursday that Democrats should quietly prepare to launch a variety of structural changes to ensure a political advantage once they gain power.
No, this is called one party rule.
If you give statehood to Puerto Rico and D.C., they're going to add four Democrat senators.
There will never be a Republican controlled Senate again.
Well, again, to be fair, unless the Republican Party changes and, as the joke goes, becomes gay communists.
We got this post from Moore's Report.
Top Democratic political consultant and campaign strategist James Carville stated on the left wing Policon podcast.
Is it Politicon?
When the Democrats regain power, they're going to grant statehood to DC and Puerto Rico.
Now, I got to just push back on the DC statehood thing.
Washington, DC is not a state because the federal government can't have undue influence over it.
So, DC was created.
They said, we're going to carve out this area because we don't want any one state to exert legal authority over them.
That's why it's not a state.
Imagine if.
DC, as the federal government, was statehood too.
I mean, that would be one state lording all over all the rest.
You can't have it.
Look at this.
Go from nine to 13 justices, add four left wing justices to the court, reopen the U.S. Mexico border and grant mass amnesty to every single alien.
Don't run on it, don't talk about it, just do it.
Indeed, my friends.
And I'm going to tell you why I would argue that Republicans, of course, don't exercise the authority and I think Democrats are going to take this one.
From Mediaite, Fox News hosts battle House Republican who joined Democrats to extend protections for Haitian migrants.
Real quick, Congressman, I hope you see the irony that so many of the talking points you just used are used by Democrats every single day to attack the Trump immigration agenda.
And I say irony because I think you're very genuine in what you're saying.
But how do you start this with supporting the president in his immigration agenda and then tell me that because your district has a specific group of people from a specific country that you rely on?
That you want carve outs.
And let me ask, I mean, 315,000 Haitians here on this program, you say a third, so 100,000 of them are in the health care system.
That's not to say if they're committing crimes or not.
So are the other 200,000 worth keeping in the country so you keep the 100,000 in the health care system?
Or have you been to Juarez?
Have you seen the Mexican people that are strung up by the cartels there and the war that is Mexico?
You could use this exact same argument if the Biden administration had applied this to Mexican migrants.
For the millions of people from Mexico that are here because they're working in industries that are incredibly important.
We can't live if we don't eat, and they work on farms that produce food.
Indeed, the point is ultimately this Several Republicans, about 10, broke from the Republican Party to support temporary protected status for Haitian migrants.
These Republicans are saying, listen, you know, it's temporary protection for people.
They can't go back.
You could make that argument for literally any single group of illegal immigrants that are here, which is why we can't.
Which is why you could expect with Republicans breaking from Trump and defending the Democrats, this is the agenda they are going to push forward.
And then, of course, man, I should even jump the gun on this one.
California's Stop Nick Shirley Act draws concerns after fraud expose.
In California, they're trying to make journalism illegal.
You cannot reveal the location of fraudsters.
Really?
If people are taking public money, the public has a right to know exactly where they are and what they're doing.
And California wants to stop this because conservatives are going in and exposing the grift, the con.
But I jumped the gun on this one.
Let me show you this from Ipsos.
The biggest concerns right now World War III is our new top apocalyptic worry.
Well, okay.
I mean, I guess with the Iran war, everything going on, yeah, World War III is scary.
Total economic collapse in the U.S. is number one.
Followed by World War III, followed by a collapse of US democracy.
I just, I roll my head and I want to bash my face into the table over and over again because Democrats keep claiming democracy is under threat.
What they're really saying is their assault on our institutions is under threat by an opposition.
You know, part of me longs for the days when we had a unified culture.
And many people said, there's no democracy.
You have a machine state controlling everything.
And that's sort of true, but the American worldview is very pro America.
We agree.
I mean, Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton over 20 years were like, we can't just have mass illegal immigration.
We got to figure this out.
Now, that worldview is held just by Republicans, and the Democrats are like, we should have mass amnesty.
In fact, you've got protesters in California saying, make California Mexico again.
Yeah, this is a dissolution of the American mission, tradition, and dream.
You've got a mayor in New York, Zoran Mandani, who campaigned on defying the law and the will of the American voters.
Not an exaggeration.
Zoran Mandani explicitly stated this that there are people here illegally, these people cannot vote.
They are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, as it were.
They are foreign aliens in this country, and the American people voted to have them removed.
Zoran Mandani explicitly stated, We will protect those people from the American voter.
I want to stress this so you can really understand what this means.
The will of the American voter voted for Donald Trump.
They said, We want these people to be deported.
Zoran Mandani said, We will not allow that.
We will defy the federal government.
This is insurgency.
This is political collapse.
Now, I understand that people in New York voted for Zorhan Mamdani.
Indeed, if you have in your country people voting to violate the law, and the law is then violated for the protection of non citizens, and then other politicians say, We're going to grant those non citizens voting rights, amnesty, citizenship, we're going to count them towards the census so we get more members of Congress, your country is being burned to the ground.
So I highlight this because the people who say a collapse of U.S. democracy aren't talking about that.
To be fair, some of them might actually be.
Climate change comes in fourth with 10%, and I just scratched my head on that one, really?
But a collapse of U.S. democracy, I am genuinely concerned, my friends, that when you have jurisdictions expanding and getting congressional seats based off non citizens, which California might have up to 10 extra, what is it, 10?
I'm sorry, I'm sorry, the Democratic Party may have up to 10 extra seats, not entirely because of California, but California plays a large role, then holy crap, are we in trouble?
The question is, how many people here are here illegally?
And there's wide estimates.
In the last five years, largely the Biden administration has estimated between 10 and 20 million illegal immigrants flooded the country.
And when these people are counted towards the census, it's going to give Democrats extra congressional seats.
It's not that the illegal immigrants will vote, it's that they will get more members of Congress and more electoral votes for president based off the presence of non citizens.
Grant those people amnesty, and polls show new citizens tend to vote Democrat.
This is the gutting and burning down of the United States.
So, yeah, I fear all of that as well.
When Democrats get in, they will pack the Supreme Court.
They will give D.C. and Puerto Rico, they're going to try to do these things.
We'll see if they can actually pull it off because don't get me wrong, Democrats can be squishy too.
But they will try more than Republicans, in my opinion.
If they get a packed Supreme Court, that's it.
The culture war is over and Democrats take the prize.
It will be the end of the American tradition.
Now, they'll call it something, but it will be a rapid transformation the likes of which we have not seen.
And don't forget redistricting in Virginia.
You want to talk about the powers that Democrats are trying to take.
Now, let's be fair Republicans redistricted in Texas under the argument that, well, you don't normally redistrict mid-decade, you do it at the beginning, and then there's a census.
That they said, you know what, we had a rapid change from the previous election, so we're going to do this.
I think it's largely political, don't get me wrong.
Democrats followed suit, and Democrats hammered the Republicans much harder than Republicans hammered Democrats.
In Indiana, the Republicans got squishy and said, No, no, we've cut a deal with Maryland.
We're not going to redistrict.
And then Maryland went, Psych, we're redistricting.
We're eliminating all the Republicans.
And now Virginia seeks to do the same thing.
Thus, the structure of Congress will not be based upon the will of the American voter, but the will of the bureaucrat who has altered the structure of governance.
The commercials they are currently running in Virginia are insane.
They're saying things like, we must protect election integrity and fairness.
So vote yes.
And you've got these people in the Republican leaning areas being like, they're lying to us.
Do you know what?
Unfortunately, stupid people are going to vote yes.
And, well, it's not so much about stupid people.
Power hungry Democrats are going to say, now's our chance.
See, the problem is if Texas redistricted, you might argue it's a bad thing.
But Virginia is not Texas.
And the people of Virginia voting to steal power to spite Texas are screwing over their own residents.
The end result of all of this is geographic hyperpolarization.
I wonder if that could be less wordy.
US polarization, like geographic hyperpolarization, means geographically we're going to see people move from blue areas to red areas, red areas to blue areas.
This is going to create dramatic changes for the United States that will be rather scary.
You are going to have a state with fundamentally different rules and laws than its neighboring state.
Conservative leaning individuals in California are going to flee, and they are, and they're going to Texas, and people from Washington, the West Coast, they're basically fleeing, entrenching these places in socialist and leftist policies.
So, what happens is, in order for a politician to get the most votes, they have to adhere to the lowest common denominator, which means they're going to find what gets the most traction.
Typically, with a blend between moderates and leftists, you're going to find yourself in the middle of the left quadrant.
Probably, as of right now, many of these people are like Social Democrat.
But what happens when you eliminate the moderates and they flee to a red area?
Now you've got Social Democrat to full on communist, and the middle ground between them is going to be overt socialism.
This is what's happening in places like New York.
Conservatives are fleeing the state.
Thus, the voter base shifts blue, and the Democrats have to pander to the lowest common denominator among staunch liberals, which will be socialists.
And thus, incumbents are getting primaried, and Congress is being polarized.
This only ends in one place.
You cannot have two distinct moral worldviews arguing in Congress.
You can have Similar worldviews with minor disagreements, arguing and compromising, and then we shrug over the compromises.
But you cannot have overt communists who hate America arguing against overt constitutional republicanists fighting communists.
They're going to be like, I want to get rid of money.
And the other side's going to be like, no.
Eventually, someone gets caned, if you know the reference.
Now, there is some light at the end of the tunnel because Ken Paxton has filed a massive lawsuit over ActBlue for rampant donor fraud.
This could put some pressure on Democrats' capability to fundraise.
Now, I'm going to tell you this.
I think the whole system is rigged.
We've covered in great detail Act Blue and how they generate tons of money for Democrat causes.
The money gets shuffled around, presumably legally, don't get me wrong, but there is concern of fraud with fraud.
James O'Keefe, among many other reporters, found instances where elderly people were purported to have made thousands of donations per day through Act Blue.
Seemingly, someone's using their name and address to dump money to various NGOs, and the money may be fraudulent, illicit, or even foreign, for that matter.
Now, ActBlue is apparently freaking out because this expose came out and these people started screaming, fleeing, and hiring lawyers.
Now they're all pointing the finger at each other.
While Democrats express their desire to use maximum power to create one party rule, there is some pushback.
But alas, my friends, the balance of power, it hangs.
And currently, the midterm's balance of power, we are looking at a Democrat House, Democrat Senate in the Kalshi prediction market at 51%.
Now, some argue this is.
Crazy.
What's likely going to happen is Democrats take the House, Republicans keep the Senate.
I love this right here.
Republican House, Democrat Senate, yet not happening.
That makes literally no sense.
But a Democrat House and a Republican Senate does seem to make sense.
There is still a small percentage chance in the prediction market that Republicans keep both.
And I actually think that may be possible.
Some have asked me, Tim, why do you think it is that Trump is not at all concerned about the midterm elections?
Perhaps he has an executive order or some kind of plan in mind to reshape.
The structure of elections.
Maybe there will be federal agents watching polling places.
Illegal votes, fraudulent vote, ballot harvesting may not occur.
In the 2020 election, I was accused of spreading election malinformation, they called it.
Talk to Mike Benz.
He uncovered this.
A bunch of institutions attacked me personally.
No joke.
They attacked me.
You know what?
I said, guys, it's not voter fraud.
Trump did not lose the 2020 election because people made fake ballots.
They were just ballot harvesting universal mail in votes.
And I was right.
And so a bunch of institutions came out and accused me of being a principal.
Pusher of fake news.
And it was the weirdest thing to me.
I started seeing this narrative emerge all over the place.
So, on my Wikipedia, for instance, this institution says Tim Pool was spending mal.
What is malinformation?
It means it's true, but it's bad.
Here's the truth Democrat organizations had a bunch of initiatives like voter in the park, ballot harvesting, and ballot harvesting is not illegal in most places.
There's just limitations on it.
With universal mail in voting, activists were able to go knocking on doors, creating a structural advantage to Democrats to getting more votes.
That's all.
So people say, How did Biden get 80 million votes?
Well, because you hear a knock on the door, you open it up, and a guy goes, Did you vote?
And you go, I don't know.
And they'll be like, You should vote.
And they'll go, Okay, well, I'm not leaving.
He's like, No, no, no, it's right there on the floor.
It's about to update down, but we don't have that number for sure.
They are not only predicting they're going to win right now, the prediction markets say they're going to win in the long run.
To be fair, my friends, from now until November is a political eternity.
And while these prediction markets are often correct in the short term, in the long term, there is way too much happening to know for sure.
We don't even know who the nominee is going to be.
Like, I think Pete Buttigieg jumped like three percentage points in the probability, and Pritzker, Kelly, and a handful of these people have gone up and down.
Nobody really knows who's even going to run yet.
You know, we're two years away from the presidential election season, but.
Next year is primary season, and we have a dual primary.
We're going to have a Republican primary.
Who's going to replace Trump?
And a Democrat primary.
Who's going to be their nominee?
And we don't even know yet.
So stick around.
We will see.
We will see.
In the meantime, Chip Roy to introduce the Mamdani Act targeting communists, Marxists, socialists, Islamists in the immigration system.
It'll never get passed, so whatever.
But at least some people are pushing back.
Although, as much as people may want to look at this and say, let's go, I doubt it'll happen.
Guys, the Save Act isn't even getting passed.
Now, Trump did have some amazing executive order saying the Postal Service can't transport universal mail in votes to ineligible voters.
He has the authority to do it.
Some are speculating that Donald Trump, at the very last minute, the 11th hour, he's going to sign a series of executive orders curtailing Democrat voter initiatives that stop them.
They will then volley, they will send a volley.
There we go.
They will level a ton of lawsuits against the Trump administration over these EOs.
But good luck getting through the court in time.
They will seek emergency injunctions.
Trump will then push back.
They do this two weeks before the election.
They will not be able to stop Donald Trump.
Now, the executive orders only have limited scope.
When Trump signs executive order on the Postal Service, he is saying, as a department of the executive branch, I can give you instruction.
And he's saying, you are not to transport universal mail in votes, mail in ballots, that are going to people who are not citizens or eligible to vote.
What this will do, the reality is the Postal Service is going to be in a bind.
How do they actually check the names of every person to figure out if they're eligible?
Doesn't matter.
Trump says it's illegal to do so, and it is, so don't do it.
And if you do, you'll be arrested.
The idea a postal worker is going to say, I ain't touching those because I don't know whose name that is.
I am not going to transport these votes.
Will that be enough to stop the Democrats?
Probably not.
That's why it happened now.
I wonder what's going to happen moving forward.
Will Donald Trump enact some kind of executive orders that just put the stop to this mail in voting and ballot harvesting scheme?
Indeed, I think it will.
Trump, I believe, will probably order the FBI and other federal law enforcement to prevent individuals from soliciting illicit ballots.
Think about what he said to the Postal Service.
Trump could announce we are sending out federal law enforcement to monitor ballot boxes against illegal voting.
If an individual is caught depositing a ballot from someone who is ineligible to vote, they will be arrested and charged.
These ballot harvesters, I get worried.
If I'm caught carrying a stack of ballots, I can't track those names and I don't know who's allowed to and who's not allowed to.
And if one name out of the bunch is an ineligible voter, the ballot harvester is going to prison.
If Trump threatens that, it may be enough to make a dent.
Keep in mind, Trump doesn't need to stop 100% of ballot harvesters.
He needs to stop 4% to cause a massive swing in a midterm election.
There's a story in New Jersey, I think this was 2020, where they found a bundle of votes in a mailbox in the wrong place that seemingly were not signed properly, indicating someone did something wrong with their mail in ballot bundling.
I think Trump will target all of this, and it could prevent Democrats from actually winning.
Perhaps, my friends.
Under pressure, FBI Director Kash Patel claims agency has evidence that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.
Stay tuned this week.
Indeed, it may be happening before our very eyes.
Kash Patel is saying arrests are going to happen.
Now, I have got a bottle of Louis XIII.
If you don't know what that is, it is very, very expensive cognac.
And I will pour that into a nice little glass and sip it if this actually happens.
And I don't mean some random no name guy we've never heard of.
Truth be told, that's likely what's going to happen.
They're going to be like Bill Shorts, you know, put an illegal ballot in the box or whatever.
Cash is going to probably, the DOJ is going to arrest some people you never heard of in some small jurisdiction for some minor infraction.
I really doubt you are going to see high level arrests of individuals over what happened in 2020.
Interestingly, in Georgia, there was a report, I think like a year ago at this point, that said something like 300,000 votes were ineligible, which meant Trump would have won.
I don't know exactly how it's going to play out, but rest assured, they're not going to sit back and just let each other take the prize.
Carville is saying when you win, we are going to make sure Republicans never win again.
Republicans are saying they're going to arrest Democrats and other likely Democrat aligned individuals over 2020.