Tim Pool exposes Democratic internal fractures, revealing officials dejected over withholding a 2024 election autopsy report while fighting over Hassan Piker's campaign eligibility. He blames Kamala Harris and Joe Biden for losses exacerbated by insufficient opposition to Israel, noting polls show a minus 28 favorability spread versus Republicans' minus 15.4. Pool critiques candidates like Graham Plattner for praising Hamas and highlights lawsuits alleging vote suppression, arguing the party's split on transgender policies and foreign wars alienates moderates. Ultimately, this disarray suggests Democrats cannot rally support in 2028, leaving Republicans like JD Vance poised to exploit the lowest common denominator. [Automatically generated summary]
We don't know if they're going moderate, if they're going to go far left.
Right now, they're fighting over whether or not Hassan Piker should be allowed to campaign with candidates.
And the big story is that the 2024 election autopsy, where Democratic officials broke down exactly how it is they've lost, is being withheld.
That's right.
Democrats are saying release the information.
Let us know before the midterms what we did wrong.
And they won't release it.
But we are getting a glimpse of exactly what went down.
And there are a handful of issues that played a role in why Democrats lost.
Most of which is Kamala Harris is awful and so is Joe Biden.
And they probably should have had a real primary.
But unsurprising to probably anyone paying attention to politics, Israel is one of the principal issues.
The progressive left bailed from the Democratic Party because they would not come out strongly enough against Israel.
And in support of Palestine, despite the fact many Democrats actually did.
So I wonder is the reason why Democratic leadership won't release this info because it is staunchly anti Israel?
Well, aside from this, there are many in the Democratic Party that maintain Donald Trump stole the election.
The thing is, the corporate press isn't giving as much air to this theory as they did when Trump supporters claimed it was stolen from Trump.
Well, to be fair, Trump also took all the air out of the room, screaming the election was stolen and still does.
So, right now, you've got many prominent liberals, well, I shouldn't say prominent, but active online liberals, maintaining that something doesn't quite make sense with the 2024 election.
To be fair, the more prominent liberals, as I should say, are pushing back on this because it's not productive to actually winning.
Right now, we don't know exactly what's going to happen in the midterms, but it's looking like Democrats are going to win.
However, does that mean there will be a unified Democratic Party?
It doesn't.
And while Donald Trump's favorability in polls may be low, the Democratic Party is polling worse than the Republican Party.
So if everybody's basing the midterms off of what we think of Trump, which I think makes sense, then yeah, Democrats are probably going to sweep.
But there are some that are pushing back.
Some argue that, look, Donald Trump isn't going to represent the entirety of the party.
Republicans might actually win if they can get the turnout, considering Democrats are suffering a major, historic favorability low.
Probably has something to do with their wackaloon policies, which could be why they won't release the autopsy.
I'm going to tell you this, my friends.
I do not believe that the principal issue is just Israel.
I think it plays a role.
But many people have already just said, what do you mean the Democrats have been staunchly anti Israel?
They've not come out in support of them.
There must be something else.
Indeed, my friends, I'd posit weird woke policies have resulted in moderates breaking from the Democratic Party.
So the question is this Will Joe Rogan vote Democrat?
That's the question.
Joe specifically, because he kind of represents the everyman, the middle of the road.
I don't know, and I don't literally mean Joe Rogan, but the people who watch his videos.
Are they going to decide that Trump is so bad they should go vote Democrat right now?
I gotta be honest, I don't think so.
If ever there was a time for the Mises Caucus libertarians to actually win some congressional seats, this might be it.
Because what we're seeing in the polling, especially among millennials and younger, is that they're breaking from both parties.
The Republicans can't cut it, the Democrats can't cut it.
So, what happens in this midterm if middle of the road voters don't actually swing for Democrats?
All that's gonna matter is voter turnout.
Now, some have said, Tim, have you ever asked yourself why it is Trump's not worried about the midterms?
Could it be he has a plan that you should trust?
Sure, whatever.
Now, I got to be honest, I'm not entirely excited about Republicans winning either.
I mean, it's better than Democrats, but what are they going to do?
Have they been particularly effective in the past year or so?
So I guess it's fair to say it's better the Republicans win the Democrats, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
Let's read this news, my friends, and get into exactly what's going on.
And I want to show you all the social media posts from the Democrats who think the election was stolen.
It's hilarious.
Before we do, however, go to wallet.rumble.com, scan the QR code.
Wait, it's over there, not there.
And download the Rumble wallet.
What is it?
It is a non custodial crypto app for your phone.
What that means is if you want to pay your buddies, you want to trade some crypto or whatever, you use this app to do it.
It makes it really, really easy.
Here's the thing it's non custodial.
What does that mean?
It means you can't be banned from it.
So let's say Rumble just really doesn't like you and you've got Bitcoin, Tether, and Tether Gold on this app.
They can't ban you from it.
It's yours.
It's your money.
It's your account.
It's your address.
There's nothing they can do to stop it.
That's been the play with Rumble the whole time, allowing you to operate independently from these big tech systems, which I guarantee you are still censoring everybody, and they will come back with a vengeance if Democrats actually win.
Right now, it's widely believed that mass censorship is going on because they want to manipulate the election.
In fact, I actually got an email from the Google Ads team specifically about the elections and their policies.
DNC chair Ken Martin told party officials he planned to release some of the results, sources said, but more than a dozen Democrats said they wanted to see the full scope of the problem.
Let's start here.
What do I mean with the Democratic Party being dead?
Okay, it's a little hyperbolic.
They function, okay?
There is still leadership.
There's a mechanism behind them, but they are massively divided.
You've got the progressives, the Hassan Piker types, the corporate Dems.
They don't get along.
The only thing they can agree on is Orange Man bad.
Well, that's not going to rally people in a midterm.
Maybe, maybe people will say, we want some kind of policies to curtail the Trump administration.
Do you really think that if you vote Democrat, they'll stop foreign war?
That's what really gets me about the Iran war.
People are like, you know, Trump, he betrayed us.
He went to war.
I was like, oh, an American president started a war in the Middle East.
Surprise, surprise.
No, don't get me wrong.
I didn't want this.
I didn't vote for it.
It happened.
We'll see how it plays out.
Trump saying things are wrapping up again.
So I'm not a big fan of these interventions.
That being said, if you came to me and said any president you vote for is going to start a war in the Middle East, I'd be like, yeah, probably.
You know, Trump was a little bit better in a lot of things, particularly with domestic policy.
So I'll take it.
I think shutting USAID was a good thing.
Now, here's what matters.
Will this be enough to get people to come and vote in the midterms?
To be honest, right now, the sentiment is massive.
People are pissed about the war in Iran.
If Trump doesn't get a handle on this one, then yeah, people right now are motivated.
But will that motivation last until November?
Probably not.
Guys, we're talking about what, six and a half months?
It's a half year, and that is an eternity in politics.
For all we know, in three months, Donald Trump does a stimulus package, pays everybody a bunch of money with his name on it.
And then they all celebrate and say, let's vote for this guy.
For all we know, that Trump comes with some executive order blocking a bunch of Democrat strategies for the election, and then they win de facto.
For all we know, a month before the election, Donald Trump says, I'm going to give everybody $10,000, $10,000.
It's good money.
You'll be yours.
But only if the Republicans can pass the legislation come January 5th, which means you better vote Republican.
There was a period where Republicans were almost enjoying net positive favorability despite doing nothing.
That's incredible.
Well, here's what we got from Axios DNC chair tries to tamp down uproar over hiding election autopsy.
So the Democrats are apoplectic.
They want to know why they lost.
Well, we can tell you.
In February, it was reported the Democrats were working on a secret report.
It found that Gaza.
Cost Harris votes.
And this surprises a lot of people, but we do have this from democraticautopsy.org.
They say what we found losing a whopping 6.8 million voters supported Biden 2020 proved pivotal in this extremely close election.
Harris's inability to mobilize these pro Biden voters may have been the campaign's biggest failure.
Former President Joe Biden's disastrous decision to run for re election they call it his betrayal, by the way abandoning the working class base agreed.
And finally, the Gaza effect.
There is ample evidence that Harris lost many voters, especially young voters, Arab Americans, and critical support in Michigan and elsewhere due to the campaign's failure to shift or even signal a potential shift in policy on Israel and Palestine.
Extensive evidence shows a huge drop off in both turnout and Democratic support among young voters aged 18 to 29.
Now, the autopsy is apparently supposed to go into exactly what these things mean.
These are surface level assessments.
But the Israel thing's absolutely hilarious.
Like, that's how hyper focused people are on Israel, that they'd be willing to let Donald Trump win unless.
Truth be told, we had several comments on Tim Cast IRL throughout the election cycle where people said they would vote for Joe Biden if he came out against Israel.
I genuinely believe Biden could have won.
If Biden came out and just said he hated Israel, I bet he would have scored a ton of votes.
There are conservatives.
That would allow Joe Biden to sterilize children, this is not an exaggeration, if he cuts military ties with Israel.
That's how much people care about the issue of Israel.
They would vote for an administration that would explicitly discriminate against people based on race and amplify child sex changes because they hate Israel that much.
Jeez, man.
By all means, let's cut off foreign spending and aid packages to whatever country, including Israel.
This is the post on Reddit about Democrats wanting the full election autopsy revealed.
And we got some great comments and sentiment.
Lonely, top comment says Ken Martin pledged to do this autopsy.
Now that it's done, he suddenly thinks releasing it would be a distraction.
Funny how that works, and the findings might point fingers at leadership.
One person said, Sir, the people are feverishly demanding more transparency in government.
Quick, hide all our mistakes.
One person says, What could it have possibly said that was more distracting than choosing not to release it?
The response only the fairly politically engaged care that it isn't being released, but the headlines it could generate, depending on what it says, could reach a lot more people.
Indeed, my friends, absolutely.
Well, here's the thing about the Democrats they're not doing too well.
They may still beat the Republicans, but the Republicans I wouldn't describe the Republican Party as cooked or dead, but people are dead.
I think everybody's in trouble.
Now, here's the distinction I draw between the Democrats and the Republicans.
I would argue that everybody is burned out on both parties.
I think the polling shows that too.
But the Republicans are still kind of unified to a large degree.
The coalition, which included libertarians and disaffected liberals, is kind of broken.
Democrats, however, are just going to war with each other.
I mean, the Hassan Piker stuff is hilarious.
They can't figure out whether they love him or hate him.
Here we have this.
Let's dive in.
From Change My View one year ago.
I do not believe there was meaningful fraud in the 2024 U.S. election.
Change my view.
Now, I just got to ask this question.
Why is it that someone would need to make the argument there was no fraud in 2024, as if the implication was it was widespread belief that there was?
The person says, I voted for Harris.
There was a massive rightward shift.
Someone says, I suppose this hinges a bit on what you consider meaningful fraud.
Regular, normal adult is the account.
He says, fraud on the scale that tips the election.
We all know that there's negligible fraud every election in the hundreds or maybe low thousands of votes, but Harris didn't lose the battleground states by a few thousand votes.
This wasn't a Hillary Biden situation where 40,000 votes across a handful of states could have changed the election.
Here we go, ladies and gentlemen.
I hope you're ready for this.
In response, the fraud wasn't with voting machine manipulation, it was vote suppression.
Republican legislatures passed a number of last minute changes to voter eligibility rules in a bunch of states.
This led to massive amounts of voters being denied voting rights without recourse.
I don't know if this threw the election, but it was widely reported.
Here's a summary from the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan organization, granted, labeled variously as liberal or progressive by conservatives.
I Googled voter eligibility changes in 2024 and got a list of multiple other sources.
Here's a description from the MacArthur Foundation, another organization labeled liberal and progressive of the Brennan Center for Justice.
Apparently, if you focus on making things better for the average person, people who focus on making rich people and corporations richer will label these organizations liberal.
You know what the truth is?
I'm trying to explain to my liberal friends here on X what's wrong with this luxury property tax and why it would be bad for the economy.
And they just don't have the capability to think beyond layer one.
Like, you need to ask them, okay, if you make this tax, what will happen next?
There's a bunch of things.
They can't ask that question.
They say, what do you mean?
The people will have to pay the taxes.
And I say, okay, let's try a conditional hypothetical.
If this tax makes it harder to invest, what would happen?
And they say, huh?
But the tax is going to make money.
And you're like, if you didn't have breakfast yesterday, how would you have felt?
Have there been ongoing threads about the secret theft from the voting machines?
Did the voting machine company sue any prominent liberals?
Uh huh.
Find it interesting, don't you?
From Western Journal.
Here we go.
This is from June of last year.
A new lawsuit asserted that election discrepancies in Rockland County, New York occurred during the 24th cycle.
The lawsuit filed by smart legislation said that more voters indicated in sworn affidavits that cast their ballots for independent Senate candidate Diane Sayre than the Rockley County Board of Elections ultimately certified for her.
This means the results of the elections undercounted the actual numbers of votes for Sayre.
There were additional discrepancies that seemed to have affected the presidential election outcome as well.
In several districts, hundreds of voters cast their ballots for incumbent Kirsten Gillibrand while surprisingly withholding their votes for Harris.
Remember that?
Remember the narrative where they said, How come so many people voted for Biden but nobody else?
Well, they've also got a similar lawsuit where everybody voted for the Democrat but not for Biden or Harris.
Could it be that Harris is just unlikable?
Whatever, man.
Indeed, this is where we're currently at.
Here we go.
Lawsuit challenging 2024 election results advances as watchdog group requests full hand recount.
Okay, my friends.
Yeah, Been there, done that.
I'm bored, right?
From our slash political opinions.
People who think the 2024 election was rigged are as illogical as people who think the 2020 election was rigged.
And the top response outside of the moderator there should be legal consequences for anyone who tried to violently overturn an election, really.
The claim could both be incorrect, but they're different.
The idea that the 2020 election was stolen rests in the belief that ballots were faked.
The idea that the 2024 and 2016 election was stolen rests in the knowledge that foreign governments provided both money and manpower to flood things like Twitter and Facebook with false signs of support, and in the fact that major donors dumped resources in very unusual ways.
The belief that machines might have been tampered with is the closest parallel, and only a minority of people believe that.
I'm just so sick of this.
Right, guys?
Democrats have been doing the exact same thing Republicans did, whinging and whining about how the election was stolen.
You've got a whole Wikipedia entry Republican Party efforts to disrupt the 2024 United States presidential election.
They give it institutional authority.
Well, outside of all of that, the question is will we actually make it in the end?
Will the Republicans win?
The Daily Beast reports CNN data guru exposes absolute disaster for Trump.
And I think that's probably the case.
But I'm not entirely convinced.
The point is the Democratic Party is split, and young voters have broken away, and they're looking for a new political party.
The Democrats don't know whether they want to be staunchly anti Israel, pro Hamas, or pro Israel, or just Israel ambivalent.
This divide in the party is bad news for them.
Now, that's.
Equally true, apparently, for the Republicans.
I think we're seeing something new emerging.
What do you get when you take, I don't know, Anna Kasparian and Candace Owens and mix them together?
You get hatred for Israel.
That seems like a new spoiler political party that might start emerging the We Don't Like Israel party.
And I'm not even joking.
We take a look at Republicans, and they're doing fairly bad.
It's going to be a disaster for Trump, they say.
But Democrats are also doing particularly bad.
The one issue that's really unifying these disaffected Republicans and liberals is the issue of Israel.
That issue is not going to be strong enough, in my opinion, to overpower the Democrat or Republican Party, but it certainly can spoil or at least create a meaningful middle of the road.
With this autopsy, I wonder if they're withholding it, because the report would suggest if they come out anti Israel, they will gain a lot more votes.
It'll do weird things to the Democratic Party, turning them into this weird amalgam of, you know, Candace Owens and Anna Kasparian.
I don't know the Democrat leadership wants that.
And so they're probably thinking, guys, this is one issue we don't want to use.
Not to mention, I mean, a lot of these people get money from AIPAC, so they're probably just like, eh, my donors don't want me to do it.