Democrats Work To OUST Hasan Piker And Leftist Influence, WOKE IS COOKED
Democrats are reportedly moving to sideline Hasan Piker as internal tensions grow over the direction of left-wing messaging and influence. Critics argue that shifting priorities signal a broader retreat from more progressive or "woke" narratives. BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/ Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere) Guest: My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL For advertising inquiries please email sponsorships@rumble.com
You're listening to a podcast right now and it's great.
You love the host.
You seek it out and download it.
You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even going to the bathroom.
Podcasts are a pretty close companion.
And this is a podcast ad.
Did I get your attention?
You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn Ads.
Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements, or run a pre-produced ad like this one across thousands of shows to reach your target audience in their favorite podcasts with Libsyn Ads.
In Illinois recently, progressives got blown out, and the more corporate, moderate Democrats seem to be winning.
We saw something similar in Texas with Jasmine Crockett and her bid for the Senate.
Stephen Colbert and James Tellerico combined powers to stage a hoax to help eliminate Jasmine Crockett from the runnings.
And now many Democrats are saying they don't want to associate with Hassan Piker.
He's getting massive backlash across mainstream media and in democratic circles.
The interesting thing is that for a while, Hassan was the darling of the media, giving beautiful profiles, but now they're calling him left wing Nick Fuentes and left wing Candace Owens, which is all just so strange because they don't really know which direction they're going with it.
But of course, Hassan Piker is pushing back, but I'm not sure it'll matter.
Seems the big play right now in politics is to close ranks around a more moderate base.
Even Joe Rogan has been critical now of MAGA as many of them being dorks, moving away, and the moderates basically saying, We don't want the fringes at all anymore.
I'm actually seeing rumblings underground, beneath the surface in the rumor mill, that powerful investment is going to be moving into candidates that are kind of more middle of the road.
It's been too destabilizing to have the far left populace and the far right populace constantly fighting each other, both figuratively and literally.
And while certainly they've already gone to ban prominent people on the right, it has now come for the one and only Hassan Piker.
That's right, the most prominent leftist streamer now faces the excision from the mainstream.
The New York Times gave him a glowing profile, and many people were upset, but now many politicians don't want to associate with him.
Because, my friends, woke is broke, it's not coming back.
Now, we think, we think.
There are a few stories where many people are saying woke will come back with a vengeance, but I don't think it'll come back overtly.
I think they may try to implement certain woke things underground, but they know that it's deeply unpopular, so they've been trying to move away from these policies on the surface.
And Hassan Piker has a past that he cannot escape.
And I'm not saying anything untoward.
You don't have to like his politics.
I'm saying the dude has advocated for a set of policies publicly that he can't now just disavow.
Democrats know they're not going to win by trying to go the progressive route.
And to be honest, powerful investors behind media don't want either MAGA or the progressive left.
So it seems like a change is here.
And it starts not with Hassan, not ending with Hassan, but certainly here is the man caught in the crossfire.
Let's jump into the news and see exactly what the play is from the Democrats moving forward.
And of course, Hassan has responded.
Before we jump into the story of the New York Times, check out timcast.com, my friends, and click join now.
We got a community on Discord, tens of thousands of people.
It's not what you know, it's who you know.
So, if there's a project you want to get started on, a song, you want to write a comic, you want to make a business, you want to entrepreneurify, whatever the word might be, you can do it by knowing people.
Joining our Discord is a great way to start, or maybe there's something you can do to help them.
I know that was not a word, by the way, it's a joke.
Also, as a member, you are supporting the work we do, so it is greatly appreciated.
Don't forget to also subscribe to this channel and share this video anywhere you can.
It would be greatly appreciated as the shares really do have a massive impact.
Here's a story from the New York Times Hassan Piker rallies spark backlash in Michigan's Democratic Senate primary.
This is where it all begins.
They say tensions over Israel burst into the open in the Democratic Senate primary in Michigan this week after a candidate scheduled rallies with a provocative left wing streamer who was an outspoken critic of the Israeli government and its war in Gaza.
The candidate, Dr. Abdul El Sayed, Who was in a competitive three way Democratic primary faced forceful criticism from his opponents and others within his party after announcing that streamer Hassan Piker would join him at rallies at the University of Michigan and Michigan State on April 7th.
Mr. Piker's huge young following has made him an appealing ally for progressive Democrats.
He did an interview with Zorhan Mamdani last year during the New York mayoral race and later attended Mr. Mamdani's election night party.
In 2024, he filmed a stream for the Democratic National Convention.
Some have called Mr. Piker the Joe Rogan on the left.
I would argue that he's not, because that would imply there would be a Joe Rogan on the right, which there is not.
But I love how the media pretends there is.
Joe Rogan is a moderate, middle of the road, independent, somewhat apolitical guy.
Hassan Piker is a progressive leftist.
They say his statements about Israel have alarmed some Democrats.
He has said that the Hamas led attack on October 7th was the direct consequence of actions by the Israeli and U.S. governments, and it doesn't matter if rapes happen on October 7th, saying it doesn't change the dynamic for me.
How about notably when he was having a discussion?
With Ethan Klein, and he said, babies are settlers.
And everyone was like, bro, bro, too far.
Well, look, even after all that, they still tried courting this guy.
But now that it seems they're closing ranks, Hassan, you got to reel it in, buddy.
They say Mr. Piker stood by those comments in an interview Friday.
He said he did not deny there was sexual violence during the October 7th attack, but that doesn't make genocide acceptable.
He also said that the United States deserved the September 11th terror attacks, but later apologized for the comment.
Dr. Al Sayed's rival seized upon Mr. Piker's planned visit, which was announced 12 days after a man drove a truck into a synagogue in suburban Detroit, wounding a guard in what the authorities described as a targeted attack against the Jewish community.
In an interview, the Jewish insider, On Thursday, State Senator Mallory McMorrow, another candidate, described Mr. Piker as somebody who says extremely offensive things in order to generate clicks.
I'm going to, I'm going to, I got to defend Hassan on this one.
Are you kidding me, guys?
Quote That is not somebody that you should be campaigning with at a moment when there is clearly a lot of pain and trauma across our state.
You don't fan the flames in Stoke Division just to get attention.
I would not accuse Hassan Piker of saying extremely offensive things for content.
I would say that Hassan Piker says what is socially acceptable on the left.
To generate a following, Hassan does not step out of line from the progressive mainstream narrative.
I don't think he's pushing the boundaries all that much just to get clicks.
I actually think of all of the progressives and all of the libs, Hassan's actually a better of them.
I know a lot of people are going to be like, Tim, why are you defending Hassan?
Well, I got to tell you what I think is true.
I think he's got bad opinions.
I don't agree with them.
But when you look at his body of work, he talks about a variety of issues.
There are many progressives and liberals who just scream Trump 24 7.
And their whole channels are literally just pictures of Trump.
Hassan doesn't do that.
He may have opinions I don't like, and he should be criticized, and you don't have to associate with him if you're a Democrat.
That's fine.
But I gotta admit, there are many more liberals that would be viewed as safe for endorsements or for rallies who are literally just rage bait machines that don't even have any literal criticism of Trump.
They just post pictures of Trump and say, Trump's crazy, Trump's bad, Trump's stupid, Trump's dumb, over and over and over again.
That I don't respect.
At least Hassan purports to have opinions.
Well, here we go, my friends, from Politico.
Why some Democrats want to shut off Hassan Piker's megaphone.
The popular streamer's rise as a Democratic influencer coincides with the party's long search for a path out of the wilderness.
Interesting, nonetheless.
They say after Politico reported that Piker, the far left political streamer with millions of followers, will stump in Michigan for Abdul Al Sayed.
History of his divisive comments launched an avalanche of criticism from Republicans and Democrats.
Piker's rise as a Democratic influencer and surrogate coincides with the party's long search for a path out of the wilderness, particularly in recapturing young men.
And what did we learn just this week?
That they're looking for white Christian men.
So when you have a pro Islamic guy, you're not really going to be catering to your new strategy by bringing him into the fold.
Piker is scheduled to appear in a live streamed Choose Your Fighter rally organized by Progressive Vision. Victory at 6 30 p.m. Saturday.
Rep Rokhana is among the list of attendees.
Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Plantner.
I thought it was Planter.
I thought it was Platner.
And was originally built as a participant, but he pulled out of the event.
Could it be because he had a Totenkopf on his chest?
And they.
Guys, this guy had a Nazi tattoo.
Not an accident, not something that looked like a Nazi tattoo, a literal Totenkopf on his chest.
The question over Piker's prominence also comes as both Republicans and Democratic parties ask fundamental questions about how big their tents should be.
In an interview with Politico, Piker downplayed accusations that have been leveled against him, like.
Center left think tank Third Way, whose leaders wrote in a Wall Street Journal op ed that Pikered a history of anti American, anti women, anti Western, anti Semitic comments.
Piker said Third Way was losing their institutional relevance.
He also said he's merely channeling, not changing, the attitudes of the Democratic base.
That's exactly what I accuse him of.
When they say that he just says shocking, outrageous things for clicks, I say, no, He's more like a Candace Owens, saying whatever the base wants to hear instead of what is true or what needs to be said.
And he kind of admits it, although he's not literally saying he's a Candace Owens.
I love how the media has called him a left wing Nick Fuentes, though.
And I'm just like, no, Nick's his own dimension.
Nick represents his own little, I shouldn't call it little, but I mean like his own sector of politics.
He's told people not to vote Republican, you know?
So I guess maybe if Hassan's saying don't vote Democrat.
I'm a megaphone, right?
Piker told Politico.
There are a lot of Barbs and Debras out there in Minneapolis, for example.
They have never encountered me, and yet they share that frustration with the failures of establishment liberalism all the same.
Piker said, those types of voters view Democrats as ineffective, inept.
It's not because they tune into the Hassan Abiy broadcast every day, he said, referencing his channel.
They are, you know, excellent plug, by the way.
That's a great, that's how you do the quote, you know what I mean?
They arrive at that conclusion because the Democrats lost to Trump twice, yet they lost to him because you're trying to give children sex changes, bro.
Like, I supported Democrats in 2020.
I donated the maximum to two candidates and a progressive member of Congress.
I wanted the establishment, for many of these reasons, to be curtailed.
The Democratic establishment sucked.
I am exactly what Hassan is purporting to describe.
The only issue is, as a regular American, my concerns over what the Democrats were doing would not be answered by the progressives.
They're going to mention that it's not Hassan's first rodeo.
He live streamed an interview with Rep Ocasio Cortez and Sanders before one of the duo's fighting oligarchy rallies.
But Piker's increasing coziness with prominent Democrats also comes as some in the party argue he poses a problem.
Here we go.
Piker is close to, but not over the Nick Fuentes line.
Here it is.
Where going on his show itself is indefensible, said Matt Bennett.
Who's been sounding the alarm about Democrats' affiliation with Piker?
Bennett added that Democrats take on all of his baggage if they don't overtly reject him, which he said is dangerous because it empowers the right and gives them an incredibly powerful tool to hit Democrats with.
That's very bad.
But some Democrats, like Khanna, argue the party needs to assemble a broad coalition.
That must include engaging with Israel critics like Hassan Piker, as PodSafe hosts have done, and many progressive candidates have done.
Of course, I disagree strongly with some of his statements.
And point that out.
But canceling people or shaming people like Hassan Piker, Sean Ryan, or Theo Vaughn is not the answer.
I like Rokhana.
I stand with him in this capacity.
I don't think shutting Hassan down solves your issue, solves the problem.
I think trying to get these personalities to moderate makes the most sense.
We've had Nick Fuentes on the show, and I thought the show was great.
I think Nick believes things that are wrong, I disagree with.
I think we agree that there is a base reality.
Like I pull up a news article, we'll agree the news has reported this thing.
But we have very different opinions.
There is, however, an overlap.
I think these conversations are important.
I think Nick is right about a lot of things.
I think he's wrong about a lot of things.
And I think he does post offensive jokes and some offensive opinions.
I would say the exact same thing of Hassan Piker, but I do think it's silly to claim that they represent the other side of each other's coin.
I don't care where you stand.
If you hold a seat that speaks to many people, then your voice is important.
When we're having these conversations, you may not like Hassan Piker Democrats, but he and the people who follow him aren't going anywhere.
That being said, there's a reason why Nick Fuentes is banned across the board.
And I would not be surprised if soon the chopping block comes for Hassan Piker.
Mediaite reports Hassan Piker is the left's Candace Owens.
Might not be a household name, at least among adults, but ask your kids.
His new role as a midterm surrogate for some Democrats is proof that his political influence is expanding far beyond the streaming platform Twitch, where he has taken up residence.
He is, without question, an online influencer with nearly 3 million followers.
His rise as a prominent voice on the left is now driving a wedge between Democrats, and for good reason.
Hassan Piker's past and present is checkered with controversial, if not outrageous, if not Bigoted state comments like this one.
No, it's Hassan Piker calling Orthodox Jews inbred.
Piker has also posted comments such as these where he unequivocally sides with Hamas, calling them the lesser of two Israels compared to the government of Israel.
Lesser of two evils compared to the government of Israel.
Piker has since apologized for his comments on 9 11, but he stood by the rest.
He's accusing others of taking him out of context.
In a Wall Street Journal op ed, the leaders of the Democratic think tank Third Way write, quote, Mr. Piker is anti American, anti women, anti Western, and anti Semitic.
No Democrat should engage with him.
All should seek to push him to the fringe where he belongs, unquote.
Hassan Piker just recently became an issue in Michigan.
Guys, I'm going to extend the same grace that I would to him, to anybody else.
You apologize for what you said.
I say good because the reason is if we do not allow for the apology, then they'll only go the other direction.
I'd much prefer Hassan Piker uses influence, step away from the far left fringe stuff, and rally people towards the things that we all can agree on, like his uncle does.
Cenk Ueger, for all of my criticism of the guy, and for which there is many, at least tries to find some common ground and repeatedly made the statement that if the left and the right just paused in their culture war and the political feuding for a few seconds and said, let's just go through the list and find out what we agree on, we'd actually be a little bit happier.
We'd actually accomplish some things.
And I respect that because it's true.
The right and the left both have issues with the healthcare system.
I don't know if we share the same solution, so maybe that one's going to be difficult.
But there are certainly some areas where the left and the right could sit down and be like, oh, no, no, no, wait, wait.
We actually agree on this one.
Let's get that one out of the way.
In the meantime, so long as we're fighting over just having power, there are a lot of things that both the left and the right in this country want that will never happen.
That's why I say accept the apologies where they matter.
I will also add he didn't apologize for a bunch of other comments that he made that are pretty dang shocking, mind you.
Hassan Piker has been on my radar.
Who's writing this one?
This is Colby Hall.
The way a lot of things are on my political news radar, preferably occasionally, enough to know they exist and maybe even matters.
He says, now I edit and write for the political media criticism outlet and have spent close to three decades tracking political narratives.
Piker gets mediaite coverage when something he says breaks through into mainstream news, which it turns out happens fairly regularly, but almost always for the same reason.
He says ugly things on purpose for clicks.
I'm going to just stress again, I don't think so.
I do not believe that.
Hassan Piker does not need to get clicks.
He's a live streamer with a consistent audience.
He needs to say things to keep the audience watching.
That means he represents, he is what he says he is.
He says what they want to hear.
Now, one might argue what's the difference?
I'm saying you could say something offensive to everybody to get clicks.
Hassan is trying to say what he thinks the people agree with to get clicks, not to shock regular people into running stories on him.
He says Piker has told his audience some remarkably ugly things.
We did cover all of this stuff.
Now, let's talk about what they mean about Candace Owens.
Piker's career runs in the same shock jock architecture that built Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.
And I reject it on Tucker Carlson.
Tucker Carlson has not built a career on being a shock jock, that's just not the case.
Say something outrageous, generate outrage, collect the clicks.
The politics are different, of course.
He's working a progressive younger audience radicalized by Gaza rather than a MAGA base radicalized by immigration.
But the machinery is identical.
When legacy media covers Carlson or Owens, the machinery is the story.
The inflammatory statement leads, the record gets examined.
When they covered Piker, they wrote about his workout regimen and his pearl necklaces.
The reach is the story, the influence is the story, the record is not.
I'll give him that.
Here's the sad reality.
There was a period where they discussed how we shift from a manufacturing economy to a service economy.
That is, the principal element that drives economic growth and sustains it will be providing services instead of making stuff.
Well, then we got into an information economy.
Really interesting.
We had people writing blogs and things on the internet, and that information became valuable.
But, my friends, we are in the attention economy now.
That is, Everyone already knows.
You may notice this with the thumbnails on videos like this one.
Let me tell you what's happening.
So, we've had people reach out and say, Tim, I don't like your thumbnails and your titles.
You used to make informational titles with informational thumbnails.
That is, a picture of me making a face, usually not so shocked.
It'd just be smiling or something or putting a hand up.
And that's usually because it was a screen grab just from the frame.
And it would say, thing happened.
It would say, like for this video, for instance, it might say, Hassan Piker.
Ousted by Democrats amid ongoing scandal.
Something like that.
The title would reflect similarly, and the average person would then go online, read that, and say, I am interested to learn more.
But in the end, every single day, when the audience is given the choice, they always choose the vagary.
Whatever is the least informative.
Why?
Because it's more likely to capture your attention.
That is the state of being online right now.
You may not like it.
I'm certainly not a fan, but I can only say this.
There are many people that don't care.
In fact, our watch time increases if the thumbnail includes less information.
If the title includes less information, the person who clicks that will watch longer and with more attention, which is really fascinating.
And I think what it says is the people that are inclined to click on a video or watch a stream or otherwise, where the statement has already been given, will pop in to collect the tidbit of information they're interested in and then leave.
But the people who are intrigued by a thumbnail or a statement want to hear the full story.
And so you're two different kinds of people.
My point is when looking at Hassan Piker and the influence being the story, what this comes to, and the reason why I bring this up for many people, and I don't necessarily believe this is Hassan's MO, they will intentionally generate bad press because attention is everything.
A good example of this would be Gen Z's clavicular.
I believe this guy intentionally generates bad press because.
Attention is everything.
It does not matter how you get it.
Well, to be fair, it matters a little bit.
There are some people, I have this thing I'm not going to say on this channel, we save it for the uncensored portion, but they say there's no such thing as bad press.
There certainly is a such thing as bad press.
And considering there are many people who listen to this show with their children in the background, I'm not going to explain what those bad press things may be.
But let me just stress Christy Gnome's husband is certainly not experiencing a bout of good press right now that he would favor or that would be good for his career.
Let's leave it at that.
Where we are going, my friends, is an anti woke world.
Hassan Piker has a few choice words for his bad faith, centrist critics.
I'd actually argue a lot of it is bad faith.
I completely think so.
I'm going to say it again.
Hassan Piker is not someone that I believe shocks people for press attention.
I believe he is someone more so who has an audience, sees their opinion, and then repeats back what they want to hear.
Kind of like a Candace Owens, I think so.
Examples of this would include my favorite critique of him is when I made a video.
About Mr. Beast being, I'm sorry, it was about how Hassan was correct.
Mr. Beast said, We're gonna cure cataract blindness, $10,000 surgeries for a bunch of people.
Hassan made a commentary video saying, It is disgusting that we have turned this simple procedure that could restore vision to so many people into a game show.
And I said, He's completely correct.
Curing cataract blindness is a simple surgery, it's not cheap, but we just remove the cataracts and now you can see again.
And instead of having a system that can just do that, we're like, let's make it a game show.
I agree.
Hassan Piker reacted to my reaction when I said, I agree with Hassan's statements also on the military industrial complex and war in the Middle East.
And then Hassan criticized me when I added, that includes the $250 billion in funding for Ukraine.
Hassan then goes, oh, yo, bro, literally says, just like, leave him.
That's my point.
Hassan does not care about the principle of the issue.
Should we be funding all of these foreign wars?
He cared about what was acceptable.
And to the left, war in the Middle East is not acceptable, but war in Ukraine is.
So it wasn't an issue of the military industrial complex like he purported it to be.
It was, my audience says yes.
That's how I view this guy.
Well, where we are headed right now is to a brave new world.
People are changing their opinions and they are coming back to the center.
This includes Joe Rogan.
From Augusta Free Press, they say the right wing comedy grift, Joe Rogan's predictably pivots toward the center.
No, Joe Rogan was always in the center.
Joe Rogan shifted to the right because moderates shifted to the right in their choice for who should win the presidency.
But Joe Rogan's always been a moderate.
The Republicans just won the favor of the moderates.
I've always been a moderate.
The Republicans just won the favor of the moderates.
It's not a grift.
Joe Rogan is just exactly this guy.
The point is, it seems to be the direction they're going.
Now, I'll give a shout out to Jon Stewart for attacking MAGA voters who are breaking, which includes people like Joe Rogan, because you'll just keep pushing them rightward.
That's stupid.
But here we go, my friends.
Nike faces major U.S. probe after discriminating against white staff.
Very interesting.
We've got this from the Daily Mail.
Nike is on its last legs as stock price plummets after woke push blows up in its face.
It's interesting, isn't it?
Woke is broke.
It is not popular.
Democrats are doing everything to get away from this.
And this is where Joe Rogan comes in.
They say, Joe Rogan's grifting.
He's going back to the center.
No, I think Democrats had a wake up call.
They've been saying for some time, I love this article.
They were like, Where's the left wing Joe Rogan?
But there was one article that actually went further and said, How come we don't have a Joe Rogan or even a Tim Pool for that matter?
And I did say he was correct, but I don't do that.
I look at Dave Smith, who's called for Trump to be impeached.
And I don't do that.
Despite the fact that I largely agree on so much with Dave Smith and Joe Rogan, my response is this You don't win friends with salad, okay?
You've got Republicans who have a belief, and you have to listen to what they have to say and offer some options for compromise.
If you approach them and attack them or insult them, they're going to say, I'm not bothering with you.
So, when the libertarian anti war types say Trump is leading us into another war of aggression with lies, I say, I hear you, brother, but how do you convince a mega Trump supporter to hear you out?
I sat down for dinner in Berkeley, in the Bay Area, with a big, massive table of like 20 diehard mega dudes, and they're all wearing their mega hats and American flag shirts.
And they knew that I was a liberal guy.
And this is like 27, 2018, when I was literally supporting Democrat candidates.
And I told them that systemic racism was real.
And they didn't insult me or mock me.
They said, I don't believe that's true.
And I said, No, let me explain it to you.
And they said, Please do so.
And I explained the progressives will tell you that systemic racism means that, like, all cops are racist.
That is not what it means.
That's not what it was ever meant to mean.
It means that in a place like Chicago, the remnants of racial policies have created a systemic problem.
Redlining and blockbusting, for instance, have created black neighborhoods specifically and intentionally.
Which creates racial animosity.
This means that the law is not being enforced equally, but it's not because the officers are racist.
It's because you have dense pockets of crime and poverty in one area and not in the other.
Redlining intentionally made black people live in areas they did not want to live because the real estate agents and companies would not sell property outside of these areas.
They did not want black people living there.
That was literally race based policy.
Now, these areas dominated by a black population.
Have distrust for the white population and vice versa.
Don't get me wrong.
In Chicago, I can tell you most of the crime in the city is coming from black neighborhoods and young black men.
That's true.
But my point is simply not every person in these neighborhoods is a criminal.
There are hardworking Americans that are black or Latino or white or otherwise that now live in an area with heavier policing because at a time when there was heavy black crime, policies were enacted and laws were put into place that forced good, hardworking Americans who were black into those neighborhoods.
Imagine someone as amazing as Clarence Thomas being told by law.
He had to go live in a dangerous gang neighborhood just because of the color of his skin.
That was the case.
These days, it's not, but the remnants still exist.
And they went, Oh, well, that I understand and that we agree on.
And I said, Exactly.
So let's call it whatever we want.
You don't got to call it systemic racism, but let's agree.
The solution is not going to be race based, it's going to be class based.
You know, making programs based on income level that allow you to get access to better schools and things like this so that we don't leave anyone behind.
And guess what the Trump supporters said?
I actually agree with that.
See, the left never communicated.
So, this is what I say to most people right now try to be friends.
Now, don't get me wrong.
I think the woke left, many of these people are intentionally lying and can't even have a conversation with them.
When liberals tell me that a news story didn't even happen, I'm like, okay, this is nuts.
But in the middle and on the right, we don't see that.
Conservatives don't do that.
I might disagree with them on the Iran war, tax policy, but they don't tell me that the truth is not the truth.
We agree.
That's what I said about Nick Fuentes.
I sit down and say, hey, Nick, here's a news article.
He goes, yes.
And I say, now, based on this article, what do you think?
And he goes, I think this.
I go, well, I think that.
Well, okay.
Agree to disagree.
We certainly, there are certainly things I think we greatly disagree on.
That's true.
But on the left, there are many people who just outright deny the news is even actually happening.
So we'll leave it here.
The machine is a changing.
Powerful people, investors, have realized we can't have these fringes.
And it seems like they're working hard to stop the dissolution or balkanization of this country.
May or may not be good.
We'll see.
Smash the like button, share the show, stick around.
More to come throughout the day, my friends, and we will see you all in the next segment.