Texas Rep Calls For ARREST Of Democrats Who Fled, Possible BRIBERY CHARGES ft. Briscoe Cain
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/ Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere) Guest: Rep. Briscoe Cain @BriscoeCain (X) My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL Texas Rep Calls For ARREST Of Democrats Who Fled, Possible BRIBERY CHARGES
I'm the chairman of the Texas House Freedom Caucus and represent a lot of the Port of Houston, which some people may not be familiar with, but that's, we produce, I don't know, close to 90% of the jet fuel for the country.
And it needs, the Constitution needs to be amended, but to do so, we need 100.
And the odds of any Democrats ever voting with us to do that is pretty low.
But the purpose, the historical purpose of it, right, was our days of horseback and walking.
And so if some state legislature was going to convene on a certain day, obviously you had to kind of wait.
You couldn't plan your trip, you needed like seven, eight days to the Capitol or something like that, right?
Those days are gone.
Um, and I wish we would have listened to uh Madison, or at least it's it's said that Madison wrote, I believe it's Federalist 58, actually, where he points out, like, this is a bad idea.
It will cause this folly, it will allow the minority to take over.
And right, um, and it was a bit of an oversight because if you take it to its extreme, does that mean they could just literally not show up on day one of a session and kill two years?
Is the only thing for them to face voters?
Is that the only punishment?
Of course not.
That's ludicrous to think so.
Let me let me ask you: there were civil arrest warrants that were issued.
And so, so it's a confusing thing because how could you arrest someone on a civil violation?
Are there any long-term penalties beyond fines for these civil arrest warrants?
Yeah, certainly.
And there could be.
So there's civil because, right, the Speaker of the House is not like a criminal magistrate, but they're legitimate arrest warrants.
And it goes through the sergeant at arms.
And then thankfully, the governor is tasked TPS with assisting.
And that includes the Texas Rangers.
And sadly, though, the Speaker kind of gave them till Friday.
I know I got time, but it's section 3602 of the Texas Penal Code.
unidentified
Look at that.
It says a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly offers, confers, or agrees to confer on another, or solicits, accepts or agrees to accept from another person any benefit as consideration for the recipient's decision, opinion, recommendation, vote, or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official, or voter.
Some of this sounds like it might be on point, man.
So, so has there been fundraising efforts from these Democrats in this area?
Yeah, certainly so.
In fact, I think recently Jasmine Crockett kind of got caught mentioning doing exactly that, not just fundraising, but helping to fund their lifestyle to fund them there.
They funded the private jet to help them leave, right?
In exchange for their discretion not to be there.
They got on private jets.
And so that has to be reported.
I can't fly on a private jet without having to report that on my ethics expenditure, okay?
These are serious problems.
And the fines, the fines are cool.
I mean, we get paid, you know, a handsome $700 a month for it.
Enough for a private job.
It's $500 a day plus the cost of having to go get them.
Any job on the planet, if you are called in by your boss for what is part of your job, part of your contract, and you go, nah, I'm hopping a private jet and leaving and I won't be back.
I was the chairman of elections, and that was my bill when they walked off the floor that day.
We grew the Republican majority after that as well.
unidentified
And some of them lost their seats.
And we still did it anyways.
And I think this time it's going to be even worse.
Anybody who's paying attention to Texas politics may know that our speaker was elected with a majority of the minority party.
And so there's been a coalition speakership.
And what they're doing now, I believe, is actually uniting the moderates and the conservatives in the House against them.
And I think they've committed political suicide.
They don't realize it because no longer, for a while, it was theory, rumored, that in order for them to say, you know, the speakers may be offering things, right, taking certain things off the table.
Well, now they broke that.
I mean, there's literally no reason for leadership to give them absolutely anything.
Well, let me ask you now about the redistricting effort itself.
The argument that's being made by Democrats, you know, Governor J.B. Pritzker went on, Colbert, and said, Trump called Texas and said, I need five seats.
It is exceedingly rare to have a redistricting in the middle of a decade before the census comes in, and that this violates the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.
unidentified
So the first question is, why are you guys redistricting right now?
And, you know, what do you have to say about Pritzker's comments?
unidentified
Yeah.
Well, Pritzker is, of course, talking at his rear end, trying to claim this violates the Constitution.
Those things are left to the states, as you may know, and it's perfectly fine for us to do so.
In fact, there's a case out of Galveston, Galveston County, and that's the island down here on our coast, that allowed them to do a similar thing based on their redistricting.
I can just say that I've been talking about it for over a year with some other folks that we were allowed to, at least, because of this Galvinson County case.
Now, it doesn't mean they did it in response to me, but people were aware of the opportunity.
Absolutely.
So what do you mean opportunity?
That sounds like it's political.
Yeah.
Opportunity to fix wrongs.
It's an opportunity to fix wrongs, right?
It's to fix racial gerrymandering.
It's to fix the VRA and the requirements of it.
Really, when you get to the heart of it, it's racist.
So explain that.
What is that?
Yeah.
I remember redistricting in 2021 when I was first running for state rep, there's a Freedman's town, an old Freedman's town in my district, or actually it's not in my district.
It's carved out.
You're going up the line.
All of a sudden, this box comes over and it goes up.
And I remember being really excited that I could go and talk with these people.
And then I realized they're not in the district.
And we're going, well, that looks like racial gerrymandering.
They're carved out.
Why?
Federal law required them to be with their own people.
It would have been illegal to put them in my district.
unidentified
And that's offensive.
But that's what the VRA was requiring, right?
And so this is an opportunity to correct some of those wrongs to allow for fair representation and to allow people to have, they call them communities of interest.
Well, why not communities?
Why not entire cities as opposed to some special class?
And I know, thank God, at least our generation or at least people with moral clarity or intellectual honesty recognize that that's nonsense and it does nothing but harm and divide.
unidentified
Yeah, so I mean, what are people in these areas saying that what I've heard is that there are districts that are Hispanic that voted for Trump, voted for Republicans, but are being forced through this racial gerrymandering to be in districts where they'll never have their voices heard and it's going to go Democrat.
When he wiggled his cane screaming at Trump during the State of the Union, the House tried to censure him, and Democrats swelled up in the well singing songs, obstructing the censure of this guy.
unidentified
And it was only a censure.
It is remarkable to me that over the past decade plus, Democrats have repeatedly across this country, either at the state level, the federal level, even city level, violated the law, broken the rules, but then act like it's an affront to them when Republicans say, oh, hey, look, this is legal and we can do this.
So people assume that because the maps are drawn weird shapes, it means gerrymandering.
No, gerrymandering is Illinois.
East St. Louis stretches in this long strip up to Urbana for the express purpose of combining two liberal cities and then everything in between, which is rural, has no voice.
unidentified
And so these people in Texas, these Texas Dems, they fly there.
And Pritzker had the nerve to go on Colbert and say, one, as a joke, it was drawn up by kindergartners as if to downplay the fact that they've intentionally stolen seats from Republicans.
But then he has the nerve to say, we will gerrymander more.
I think we should go ahead and declare their seat vacant, order a special election, which, by the way, can be a great opportunity for Republicans to maybe flip some seats for a little bit.
unidentified
Where do you think the Supreme Court of Texas leans?
You think they're going to go Republican or what?
I don't know what they'll do.
I hope they'll follow the law.
Of course, I would like for them to side with me politically, but not at the expense of the integrity of the institution.
That's the thing that I think separates us from the left is that process matters, that law matters, that we still have that moral high ground.
unidentified
But I'm hopeful.
And I'm actually in talks with a few of my colleagues on whether we're going to do some amicus letters and things advocating for it or explaining kind of the reasons, especially some of the historical context of why that quorum requirement's there.
Because the Democrats are arguing like this is a legitimate procedure.
I'm sick of the politicking across the board, across the country.
The purpose of the quorum, you already mentioned it, but back in the day when you're walking, the idea was, hey, if people aren't here, we don't want the minority rushing in and then passing bills against the will of the voters in the state.
The quorum rule is basically to be fair, but it's being exploited by people who've lost the elections.
unidentified
That said, elections have consequences.
So the politic is, here's my concern is the judges are going to be not weighing the law or the practical reality, but they'll be weighing the implications politically.
And that's what we see over and over and over again way too often.
If you were judging this honestly, you'd say, the quorum rule is not to be exploited to shut down Congress.
unidentified
You have every opportunity to be at your session and do your job that you agreed to do.
And if you've chosen not to be there, there's some leeway, but after a few days, you have quit.
You are no longer working that job.
Vacated.
You're done with it.
You know, I see, I would say in Texas, our judges are elected statewide.
So they stand for election and they're not strangers to political pressures or name-calling.
And what I'm going to say is I think our state judges, at least elected judges, kind of tend to stand up to political pressure a little better than the federal appointed guys, right, who grew up in this bubble, have never been name-called before, never had anybody yell at them or send mail or put up billboards.
Those dudes tend to kind of back down a lot easier than some of the elected ones.
I mean, one thing we've seen over the past decade plus is the left has been particularly good at organizing pressure campaigns.
unidentified
So the real question for a lot of these elected officials and just judges in general, I mean, with all due respect to the Supreme Court, I think they've done pretty well recently.
But you look at Amy Coney Barrett's rulings after someone threatened to, someone actually tried to kill Brett Kavanaugh, they bend.
They bend.
There is absolutely no doubt that federal judges do that.
We had that famous court case, Texas v. Pennsylvania, back in 2021.
I think end of 2020, 2021 over the election, Texas as a state arguing that other states violated the Constitution by altering the rules of federal elections without going through their state legislatures.
And the Supreme Court, except for Alito and Thomas, said, nah, we're not even going to hear the argument, which is cowardice.
I talked to a state prosecutor in West Virginia and a previous AG, who's now governor, and I said, why aren't we seeing red states do what Democrats do in blue states?
unidentified
That is bring charges against their political opponents for things in which charges are warranted.
I don't want to see some random Democrat charge on a fake charge like they did to Trump, but I'm saying with like the Clinton email server, for instance, was she campaigning at all in West Virginia?
Yes, she was.
Are there potential violations that the state?
Of course they could find these violations.
And everybody keeps asking why the federal government doesn't intervene when it's the states.
The states could be doing a lot of this.
And Texas has been doing that.
Even right now, I see is what you guys are doing, often leading the charge in these challenges.
But where are the rest of these Republican states to take any action?
With what we're seeing Democrats do in your state, saying they're not going to come back.
Politico is reporting a fine of upwards of $400,000 per special session called by the governor.
Civil arrest warrants.
I mean, it sounds like the only way this gets resolved is if the state is willing to actually enforce action against these Democrats or at least take the interpretation.
If the courts don't say the seats are vacated, Democrats can just say, fine us, we don't care.
I don't know why we're negotiating with them, though.
unidentified
I think governors should just do it.
If the courts drag their feet or play dirty games, we need men of action.
We need people who are going to say, listen, I'm not playing this game where you can leave, violate the spirit of our laws and our goodwill to steal political power in this state and in this country anymore.
So just say, nope, you know, you know, you know what you should do?
Now, look, you know, without going in circles, were I in a position of power, I'd just be like, parliamentarian, you can leave.
This is a formal session.
unidentified
It is official and it is done by.
If the Democrats can break the rules, so can we.
And they can bring it to court and challenge it.
And then we'll see what happens.
But I don't want to rant.
I do appreciate you coming on.
Is there anything else you wanted to add before we go that people should know?
No, I just hope some of my colleagues, you know, hear your words of encouragement and realize that there is more to be done.
They don't have to just sit around and wait.
But it's odd because it's almost like they're afraid of offending them because they want to work with them.
They come back.
I don't get it.
If they were to tell their voters that, they'd be so pissed off.
Like, oh, I'm nice to them because we're going to get along.
That's not what you said on the campaign trail.
Right.
I assure you that.
So thank you.
We just need six.
You know, look, maybe if there's a couple of bubbles out there with some, you know, big up pickup trucks, some Florida guys, some Georgia boys, just go find six of them and bring them back to Texas.
So we can get our job done.
Right on.
Rep Kane, thanks for joining me.
I appreciate it.
We'll see you next time.
Adios.
Take care.
All right.
You know, I'm just going to say it one more time.
I want people to do things.
So that was, of course, that was Rep Briscoe Kane.
Really appreciate him joining and explaining everything that's going on.
We're going to get that raid going for you guys to go join our friend Russell Brand.
But I got to say it one more time because this one just strikes the heart, man.
Democrats have decided in Texas, we will violate the spirit of the rules.
Okay?
They're exploiting the rules by breaking quorum.
That was never the intent.
They are willing to face arrest.
They are willing to face fines for violations.
They don't care that the Republicans threaten weight of law against them.
We're the Republicans to say, we will play in kind.
The session will happen without you.
The quorum rule be damned because you broke it in the first place.
Sue me.
I'm not playing this game where I have to sue you.
You sue me.
I will do it anyway.
You sue me.
I'm sick of hearing these, but the speaker said no, or the parliamentarians said no.
You think the Democrats cared when they broke quorum?
No.
They're challenging you to sue them.
Let's play that game.
My friends, we got Russell Brand geared up to go live and carry on with the next, I believe it's Russell Brand.
Let me make sure.
Sometimes it changes, but it's usually Russell.
And okay, so it's not Russell.
Who do we got going up?
I'm not sure.
Let me see if we got any notifications.
Nope.
Russell is not live today, I believe.
These things happen.
But it looks like Viva Fry is.
So we'll send you to hang out with Viva.
Shout out to Viva Fry.
We'll send everybody on their way to hang out with Viva.
Big fan.
Good friend.
Appreciate it.
My friends, you can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast.
We, of course, have more segments coming up throughout the day.
We're back at 8 p.m. for Timcast IRL.
You don't want to miss it.
More to come on this story.
Really do appreciate you guys watching, but share the show if you really appreciate it because with the Rumble Morning lineup, we have become the top, not just us, but everybody.
We're the top 10 live streams and news and often the top 10 live streams for all content in an off-cycle year.
It's not a political year.
And thanks to you guys and your passion and your willingness share, we are keeping the conversation going.