Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

June 2, 2025 - The Culture War - Tim Pool

31:33

SECOND Civil War Game Out Online, Former CIA Says "It's Coming" And TRUMP Is To Blame

SECOND Civil War Game Out Online, Former CIA Says "It's Coming" And TRUMP Is To Blame BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/ Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere) Guest: My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

31:03

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		We have a story from Military.com.
		An alternate history channel on Reddit is gaming out a shockingly realistic second U.S. Civil War.
		Very interesting stuff.
		But let me just say this.
		You may be saying, Tim, you crazy.
		There's not going to be a civil war.
		That's silly.
		Who would fight?
		Why?
		You know, I've talked to prominent individuals and they always say the same thing.
		They always say the same thing.
		I go outside.
		I look around.
		Nobody's fighting.
		To which I respond.
		Do you think in 1864, in Atlanta, some dude walked out of his house and looked at his neighbor who was flying an American flag, a Union flag, and they went, ooh, I'm going to fight you.
		No, they went outside and said, howdy, neighbor.
		The same is true today.
		I don't know what happens, but I do know.
		That it is now in the highest levels of government.
		We've got the story from the New York Times.
		Unease FBI as Kash Patel ousts top officials.
		Quote, the FBI has become so thoroughly compromised that it will remain a threat to the people unless drastic measures are taken, he wrote in his book Government Gangsters, asserting that the top ranks of the bureau should be eliminated.
		Behind the scenes, his vision of an FBI under Trump is quietly taking shape.
		Agents have been forced out.
		Others have been demoted or put on leave with no explanation.
		And in an effort to hunt down the sources of news leaks, Mr. Patel is forcing employees to take polygraph tests.
		Is it coming?
		A civil war.
		But let's talk about it.
		Among the younger generation, and this is what I think matters most, 43% of Americans say a civil war is at least somewhat likely in the next 10 years.
		Among the younger, I'm sorry, this is general, public.
		Posted in 2022.
		However, it's actually much crazier than that among young people.
		Among the younger generation.
		They actually think it's much more likely there will be a civil war.
		YouGov has the data that shows it skews largely among younger people.
		Let me see if I can find the quick civil war.
		40% think that a civil war is likely.
		32% think it's likely between red and blue states.
		30% says rich and poor.
		29% think people of different races.
		20% think it's likely between urban versus rural.
		And so this is actually an interesting poll.
		I know a lot of people may be saying they don't think it's going to happen, but the question is, why do you believe that YouGov thought it necessary to do this poll in the first place?
		And why do you believe they found 43% of people think it's possible?
		Because people are actually discussing it.
		This was 2022.
		It's a year and a half, September, after J6.
		Donald Trump is now in office.
		When I talk about the issue, people tell me I'm crazy.
		I recommend you guys watch the episode of Triggernometry I did, where we basically had this debate.
		I went into great detail.
		Now, I'm not sitting here saying I think a civil war is going to happen.
		I'm not sitting here saying it's guaranteed or anything like that.
		I'm saying the precursors are as such that people believe it may be coming, a substantial amount.
		I didn't create the idea.
		I didn't coin it.
		Nor do I ever actually promote that it will happen.
		However, to be fair, on Twitter, people don't understand nuance.
		They're very stupid.
		So when I say things like civil war, I'm not saying it's literally happening.
		People aren't smart enough to understand that.
		I'm saying these are all precursors to and indicative of.
	So take a look at this.
	Among Democrats, they say Democrats are more confident than other Americans in the government's ability to defeat an uprising of armed citizens.
	It's fascinating.
	They say that how concerned are Americans about political, racial, and religious extremism?
	White supremacy, 43% are concerned.
	Isn't that very concerned?
	Isn't that crazy?
	That's the media.
	Largely targeting the older demographic.
	So Bloomberg, I think, I don't know if I have them breaking it down.
	They say, the survey conducted among 1,500 U.S. adults found two-thirds of Americans believe political divisions have gotten worse since 2021.
	In comparison, only 8% say it's grown less divided.
	Here's the way I bring this up.
	And the fact that young people are more likely.
	Let me see if we have this.
	Let's see the age breakdowns.
	47% of Americans under 30, according to you, Governor the Economist, said a civil war in the next decade is at least somewhat likely.
	47%.
	All right.
	Here's over at military.com talking about the alternate history, people gaming out a shockingly realistic civil war.
	Now, what I want to say, which is hilarious about this, I live here.
	This map they're showing on the screen for those that are just watching.
	It shows Harper's Ferry, and it says the second battle of Harper's Ferry, April 15, 2025 to 27 of April 2025.
	Yeah, it didn't happen.
	We're well past that.
	I don't think this stuff is actually realistic, especially considering the article was written after the battle already took place.
	But I will say this.
	It's fascinating to look at a map where people are wondering what would happen to Harper's Ferry because I use these bridges like every day.
	Let me take a look at where we're at.
	So this is the Horn, Harper's Ferry.
	Harper's Ferry is a postal jurisdiction that actually extends well down into the southern area, into these mountains, Blue Ridge Mountains.
	And though each of these areas are unincorporated and have their own names, the postal zone is still Harper's Ferry.
	And then we have, this is the walking bridge and train.
	And you have, where are the bridges?
	Okay, so this is a bridge right here.
	This is a bridge right here.
	These are the bridges we use to get into.
	So when I talk about how close we are, our old studio is actually just over here.
	I said we're very close to Loudoun County.
	This is Loudoun County right here.
	Military.com says, alternate history writing looks at what-if scenarios.
	What if the Soviet Union won the Cold War?
	What if the Roman Empire never fell?
	It's not just interesting escapism.
	It also allows readers to look critically at the world they really live in and reflect on current events.
	Popular alternate history stories have even become major television shows or movies.
	Philip K. Dick's 1962 novel, The Man in the High Castle, set in an alternate timeline where an assassin killed Roosevelt and Germany and Japan won World War II.
	The book was later adapted into an Amazon Prime series.
	I do think it's largely silly, though, The Man in the High Castle.
	Because I don't think the U.S. would ever get invaded and taken over nor forced to have a Nazi ideology.
	To be fair, though, Nazism was prominent in the United States before World War II.
	On Reddit's alt-history subreddit, users post scenarios asking, what if the Soviet Union intervened in Iran?
	Or what if the U.S. plan for the Middle East was implemented after World War I?
	Visual posts garner a handful of likes or comments, but a new alternate history timeline is making the rounds with interactions in the thousands.
	This new timeline from Redditor George Squershington looks at an alternate world where someone really did hack the 2024 election, both sides contested the results, and America fell into a dark civil war.
	Now, I've talked about this before, this alternate timeline.
	What I want to say is they're entering an alternate path for us.
	What I think is interesting about it and why it's worth looking at.
	The posts that they fabricate, I say fabricate, but the posts that they've created artistically to represent the real world actually look like real world posts.
	What I mean is, when you see someone saying, we've created a path for an alternate timeline where there's a civil war.
	They mention in the military.com that they're looking critically at how it may play out.
	You'll see a story that says something like, far-life extremists.
	You know, open fire on, you know, right wing group or something like that.
	And when you look at it, you're like, wow, that's crazy.
	That's what starts a civil war.
	Then you take a look at our own actual news and it's like far leftists open fire on Tesla vehicles and attack private owners.
	And you start to understand, oh, that it's actually, it is actually happening, this escalation and before our eyes.
	Now, again, that doesn't mean.
	The predictions of these people are correct in that it would lead to a civil war.
	The point is, we are looking right now, a man in Colorado with Molotov cocktails set fire to several individuals who were pro-Israel.
	Or I don't even know if that's fair to say.
	They were raising awareness for the hostages, the Israeli hostages.
	And this man was screaming, free Palestine, screaming that he had to do something.
	We see actions like that.
	We saw the Tesla attacks.
	In an alternate timeline, it is reasonable.
	If someone were to write up a story about how a war broke out or a civil war broke out, these things are realistically believed to be components of that escalation.
	The issue now is, in the fictional reality that's being drafted about a second world war, Many people, it's easy to believe.
	Oh yeah, like someone blew up a car or whatever.
	Of course that makes sense in the story you've written.
	Then you ask about the real world.
	What about the people who are unloading rifles into Tesla dealerships?
	That happened.
	And they say, oh, that's isolated.
	It's not going to go anywhere.
	Why?
	Why the difference?
	Optimism bias and normalcy bias.
	They may be correct.
	We don't know.
	There's been terror before.
	The weather underground did a lot of bombings.
	No civil war happened.
	The point is, because of optimism and normalcy bias, people want to reject the possibility outright.
	Instead of saying it's probably low, but these are the precursors.
	Military.com says, George Squashington, asked only to be identified by his username because of harassment, calls a scenario, how would Reddit react to a modern civil war in the US?
	The story plays out in fictional screenshots from social media, Wikipedia, YouTube, and more, all posted to the Reddit channel.
	Quote, I saw where people were claiming that the election was stolen, like even my mom and dad talk about it sometimes, saying the 2024 election might have been hacked.
	George Squashington told Military.com.
	And I just started to think, what would happen if it were true?
	Or at least...
	Well, let me pull it up for you guys.
	It's a small subreddit, but here we go.
	This is r slash verify 2024.
	This is a subreddit, only 7,000 members, okay?
	But it's a top nine percentage.
	Top 9% ranked by size, meaning it may have a very small amount of members, but it gets a lot of activity for how small it is.
	These people are insane.
	They genuinely believe the 2024 election was stolen.
	They say, from last week, New Georgia voter website glitch briefly exposes personal data.
	Big report on 2024 election interference in conjunction with Election Truth Alliance.
	These aren't the only ones.
	It's just one dedicated subreddit.
	Rosie O'Donnell.
	Has been making videos that are insane and make no sense because she genuinely believes this stuff.
	And she's prominent.
	She fled the country.
	She had a video where she was like, explain to me how for the first time the Republican won every swing state.
	Not true.
	Just plum not true.
	Quote.
	I'm sorry.
	So I did read all this already.
	What would happen if it were true, at least?
	Readers learn about new developments in their war through simulated internet reactions to the war's events.
	George Washington, along with his supporters in a special Discord channel, game out scenarios.
	And the story continues to evolve.
	Then he and some of the collaborators create detailed screenshots of what it would look like as the internet responded to the news.
	In the story, the first contested election results lead to recounts in key states.
	Tipping the election from Donald Trump to Kamala Harris.
	Protesters from both sides clash violently.
	Fires break out in Trump Tower.
	Harris is inaugurated in a bunker and Trump barricades himself at None of that happened.
	It is all a silly story.
	But let me try this.
	What about the people that are claiming these silly stories are actually real?
	June 1st, from El Paez, which is Spanish language news, Barbara F. Walter, civil conflict expert, quote, I see Trump provoking a foreign war to force a third term.
	I don't because I'm not insane.
	Now, all these people, there's many people who believe it's not possible, For the U.S. to break into civil war, once again, they say silly things like, I go outside and nobody's fighting.
	They say things like, who would the factions be?
	There's no north and south.
	Red states are split up all over the place.
	And I just, I ask them, please, for the love of all that is holy, read about any other civil war.
	Basically, every single civil war that's ever happened except the United States was various jurisdictions falling to ideological groups.
	The Syrian civil war had something like 12 different factions fighting the government.
	They slowly got defeated and then started to unify under, was it al-Nursra and ISIS, then eventually just ISIS, a unified group, the Islamic caliphate at war with the Assad regime.
	It doesn't have to be red versus blue.
	In the United States civil war, in fact, you had seven states secede from the end before Lincoln was even inaugurated.
	And then they formed their own confederacy.
	It was stated that Texas only joined out of necessity because of the proximity.
	Certainly they were a slave state, but they were also just like, we can't be part of a union with no access to the union.
	So for the most part, they just said, I guess we're out.
	Then Lincoln attacked.
	To be fair, the Battle of Fort Sumter happened.
	People were pissed.
	Nobody died from the conflict.
	One person died in an accident.
	Then you had the Battle of Bull Run.
	The union was routed, and then...
	That's literally how it started.
	After this, several states then flipped.
	They were two-thirds pro-union, not in favor of the Confederacy, but after the Lincoln rallying of troops and the invasion of the South, several states then said, we're breaking from this.
	The point I'm making is no one really understands how these things can escalate to this point.
	But I do have questions about where we go from here.
	If Barbara F. Walter is correct, or more importantly, I doubt she is.
	But if she feels this way, and many other people do, then I have some questions.
	What happens if Trump does win another term?
	What happens when, with a moderate coalition on the right, Republicans win 2026 and 2028, and Democrats get locked out of power?
	They're not going to tolerate minority rule.
	I shouldn't say minority.
	They're not going to tolerate being in the minority is what I mean to say.
	Take a look at this from El Pais.
	Barbara F. Walter, 60, has spent her entire career studying what drives countries to civil war and how to avoid such conflict.
	Born in Bronxville, New York, she's a professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego.
	During Trump's first term, particularly in the wake of the pandemic and the assault on the Capitol, she began to have an uneasy feeling about the signs of instability.
	She had seen places like Yugoslavia, Syria, and Iraq were beginning to appear in her own neck of the woods.
	In 2023, the publication of her book, How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them, caused a considerable intellectual impact in the United States.
	In the book, which includes interviews with Civil War survivors and presents all the precedents to internal conflict with scientific rigor before issuing a diagnosis, she argues that her country meets the two requirements that usually occur before a frat...
	Fratricidal conflict.
	Sure.
	The emergence of two factions organized on either side of the lines marked by race, religion, or identity, and the fact the U.S. has fallen for the first time since its founding into the group of what the Center for Systemic Peace calls anocracies.
	These regimes fall somewhere in the gray area between full democracies and pure autocracies, two systems that, for opposite reasons, never slide into civil war.
	This is a scale on which the former are rated plus 10 and the latter minus 10 in between the autocracies, countries that rank between minus 5 and plus 5. So here's what I want to say before we read on for more of this.
	The reason why I brought up the YouGov data is The issue is that hyperpolarization among the youth is more pronounced than the older generations.
	With all of these generations voting right now, You will get an older generation voting for unity and saying we don't think civil war is coming, and a younger generation voting in a hyper-polarized manner.
	In fact, our own market research here at Timcast suggests that if we want to attract younger viewers, we have to be extremely aggressive on what we want this country to be doing to the enemy factions, to the opposing political faction.
	Kind of creepy.
	Younger people believe a civil war is coming, and they are hyper-polarized.
	Older people don't believe it's coming, and they are less.
	So let's do the math.
	If you're 65, hanging out with 65-year-olds, you know some people in your family are liberal and conservative and you mostly get along.
	And that's it.
	But if you're 25, you probably don't hang out with any people of the opposing political faction and all you see is violence on social media.
	So what happens?
	These people are prepared for something to escalate.
	They believe it will.
	When the older generation dies, there will be Let's just say, let's break it down into 50 plus and 50 below.
	18 of 50. They're more likely to believe a civil war is coming and they're more hyperpolarized.
	50 plus are not.
	The 50 plus die, then you have a younger generation, then every single person in this country is going to be in the camp of, we are heading towards some type of civil conflict.
	Now I've asked many people about this, and it's fascinating that they can only conclude one of two things.
	And that is, if you're on the right, I would ask this.
	Do you believe that Democrats are unscrupulous?
	Of course.
	Do you think that they are willing to violate the Constitution to steal power?
	Of course, they did.
	They arrested Trump's lawyers.
unidentified		Okay.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So if you're on the right, you recognize the left is violating the law, stealing elections, and doing all of these things.
		Yes.
		Okay.
		Do you think Trump will fight back?
		Well, then you get mixed answers.
		Some say yes, some say no.
		All right.
		And that's where we end up with the two potentialities.
		Either you get a communist revolution and full Democrat takeover, or Donald Trump fights back.
		Now we have another question.
		Do you believe the Democrats will resist?
		Invariably, people say, of course they will.
		The far left is violent all the time.
		Okay.
		So some kind of civil conflict.
		The question then is, it's very simple.
		Both the left and the right.
		I have someone on the left.
		I was talking to Adam Friedland about this.
		I don't know how they edit their show, but he was saying civil war can't happen.
		Stuff happens all the time.
		And I said, let me ask you a question.
		Do you think Trump is violating the law?
		He says yes.
		Do you think he's acting unconstitutionally?
		Yes.
		Do you think he is doing things that are unprecedented?
		Yes.
		Do you think anyone's going to stop him?
		No.
unidentified		Okay.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So you think there will be a fascist revolution in this country.
		You are either arguing on the left or the right that there will be a fascist revolution, a communist revolution, or a civil war.
		I don't see how anyone could be arguing for something else.
		No, no, we're going to have this, you know, hyper-polarized nation where both sides are committing, are violating the Constitution against each other, but it never breaks out in a fighting.
		Doesn't that just sound silly?
		Like, Democrats are going to be like, they're all fascists, they're arresting people illegally and doing whatever they want, but we don't care.
		But then we're going to go arrest people illegally.
		No, that just sounds like administrative civil war, which is what we're in already.
		Now, I certainly think, I think many of you would agree, that on the right, Republicans, Trump, Cash, are enforcing the law, upholding our Constitution, and fighting corruption.
		I think it's a fact.
		I think when you look at the data, you can see that it's a fact.
		On the left, it's inverted.
		They think Cash is corrupt.
		He's targeting his political opponents because, well, they don't read the news.
		So how does this end up?
		Where does this country end up going if this is the case?
		There's a few potentials, I guess.
		There's a possibility.
		All the fighting simmers down.
		Everybody's bored.
		Nobody cares about politics anymore.
		I don't think so.
		Because of the Democrats' willingness to say, I don't know, like publish the private phone records of a journalist like Adam Schiff did, or to arrest Trump's lawyers like we saw in Wisconsin and Georgia, to falsely accuse Trump of felonies.
		To falsely accuse a sitting president of being a traitor to his own nation and working for the Russian government?
		I don't see why this de-escalates.
		Is Trump just going to be like, no, no, no, we're completely okay that they did all that stuff?
		Yeah, I don't think so.
		Certainly it's possible that Trump just says no.
		And then Democrats simply just go like, well, we're not going to be communists anymore and we're not going to violate the law and everyone just calms down.
		But I don't think anybody sees it as a realistic probability.
		We have this from El Paez.
		They ask, Barbara F. Walters, did you enjoy the movie Civil War?
		Oh, boy.
		She says, you know, they invited me to the premiere in New York, and I didn't go because I didn't want to be seen as legitimizing the movie.
		I would have bet that it was going to be a very terrible movie, but I watched it and thought they did a very, very good job of being against Americans, the sense of what a Civil War would feel like.
		No, they didn't.
		Kind of.
		The movie didn't do any justice to the concept of civil war.
		It was a bunch of journalists who were on a vulture romp, gloating over the death of other people, and it was just— Some.
		But really, no.
		Really, I think the movie's goal was to show you the depravity of modern journalists and show you how evil people are.
		I will tell you this.
		In the journalism industry, I've largely met...
		I mean it.
		I genuinely mean it.
		On the ground covering conflict and crisis, mostly evil people.
		They call them vultures.
		That's why.
		Now, I know that a regular vulture ain't evil, just it eats carrion, right?
		But these journalists choosing to go in and seeking to inflame and laugh and enjoying death, that's depravity.
		The question, it wouldn't look like the first one, North versus South.
		Barbara F. Walter says, There wouldn't be soldiers in tanks.
		I mean, that came at the end of the film.
		But that middle section of the movie, when they're traveling to D.C. and they're stopping, for example, at a gas station, that's exactly what I thought of, to be honest.
		And I see these men strung up.
		That's what a 21st century war looks like.
		It's anarchy.
		It's anarchy that allows these subplots and subfights to happen.
		So you may have a rebel group fighting the government.
		But then you might have energy at the local level, where if your neighbor wants a piece of your farm, they just walk into your house and kill you.
		And Americans don't realize that a civil war could unleash a whole series of micro-events.
		They just want to have hope that things work out.
		Indeed.
		There has been two years since you've published the book.
	What's changed?
	Barbara F. Walters says a lot has happened, but the conditions I describe in the book remain the same or worse.
	We are fully ensconced in an inocracy.
	With Trump's return, there's been a drastic decline in the quality of the democratic system.
	It's happening quickly.
	And everything indicates the president wants to weaken it further.
	If he can, he will eliminate the checks and balances on the executive branch.
	I can imagine a scenario in which he's successful in creating a dictatorship.
	Interesting, interesting.
	Okay, I will give Barbara F. Walter this one.
	I think functionally she's correct.
	The only problem is, like her and Stephen Marsh, they ignore the fact that Democrats were doing all these things.
	It's like their brains shut off when Democrats do things.
	Me, I don't care for either bubble individually.
	I can tell you exactly.
	Donald Trump, in the gutting of USAID and these institutions, was detrimental to the global liberal economic order and the way they view democracy.
	They view democracy as powerful, deep-stated, bureaucratic institutions doing whatever they want.
	So when they see Trump gutting this stuff, they say he's ripping our institutions to shreds.
	But see, therein lies the conundrum.
	I can tell you outright, Donald Trump shuttering of these agencies can escalate the tensions.
	Donald Trump and Cash Patel and Bongino and Pam Bondi going after Democrats can push us to civil war.
	Indeed.
	But I think it is right to hold these people accountable for what they've already done.
	On the left, they seem to completely ignore the fact that Democrats falsely charged Donald Trump with felonies, falsely accused him of rape, falsely accused Brett Kavanaugh of gang rape, falsely accused Trump of civil fraud, raided his home, falsely arrested his lawyers violating the Constitution.
	You can't arrest people's lawyers.
	Like, none of that ever happened.
	Remarkable.
	She's asked, when did the U.S. join the Anacratic Club?
	Now, what I want to add is many people may say, well, why are you talking about this, Tim?
	Barbara F. Walter did work for the CIA and did track when other countries would fall.
	So I do think, functionally, she brings up interesting points.
	I just think she's biased and has ignored the fact that Democrats are the ones who started all the conflict.
	She said in December of 2022, we were at a plus five.
	It was the first time we hit it in history of the United States.
	This lasted until early 21 when it became clear that Trump would actually leave the presidency peacefully and that his successor Biden wouldn't try to exploit the undemocratic features in the U.S. Laughably stupid.
	We rose to a plus eight.
	I'd say we're now to plus three.
	The risk of civil war isn't just if you're in this anocracy zone, which we now are, but it's exacerbated if you get there very rapidly.
	If you have a two-point or more change in the score, But they won,
	right?
	If Trump is successful in fixing elections, if he's able to suppress the vote, and if he's able to purge the voting rolls, it becomes very hard for Democrats to win again.
	This would be the Viktor Orban model.
	If we have elections but Trump always wins or the Republicans always win, then you'll probably have more than half the American population essentially excluded from government.
	They become the group out of power, and I think they would eventually begin to mobilize to demand reform.
	But it became clear that they were never going to get back into power through nonviolent means.
	I could see extreme elements emerge within the Democratic Party.
	Really?
	Only then, huh?
	Which political faction has got a voter base going around that's anti-Israel, anti-Zionist?
	Don't get me wrong.
	The right certainly has it.
	But I can tell you this.
	Anti-Zionist conservatives or right-wing individuals, however you want to call it, said don't vote Trump.
	Famously, Nick Fuentes told people not to vote for Trump.
	On the Democrat side, the anti-Zinus progressives told all their followers to vote for Joe Biden.
	We here at TimCast had people super chatting on TimCast IRL saying they would vote for Joe Biden because Joe Biden was more anti-Israel than Trump.
	That's what they cared about.
	So you mean the Democratic Party, these progressives who voted for Joe Biden and advocated for the Democratic Party, who were shooting up Tesla locations, firebombing Tesla vehicles, who have protested violently.
	For years, in black bloc, for a variety of issues, that's not within the Democratic Party.
	This is the insane world these people live in.
	Now that the popular vote went to Trump, Trump has the popular mandate, I would not be surprised to see the far left escalate to that degree.
	But I'm going to wrap it up there, my friends.
	I'll grab a couple of Rumble rants on the way out.
	Smash the like button.
	Share the show with everyone you know.
	Thank you all for hanging out.
	I do humbly request you guys share this video if you can.
	You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
	Thank you all so much for hanging out.
	Do have about a minute left, so we will grab some of your ramps before we send you on a raid to our friend Russell Brand.
	Wolf Blossom Farm says, Bigfoot is real!
	Never stop believing.
	We saw that Bigfoot video last week and it looked like a guy in a suit.
	Sorry.
	All right.
	What have we here?
	Super Immersive Bros says, conduct Chris, the bandwidth sucks almost all the time and we have to restart the video multiple times.
	Never happens on Kick, X, or YouTube.
	I'm forced to YouTube for my Rumble lineup.
	Well, I'll talk to him.
	Pinochet says, in the second U.S. Civil War, the Harvard Shield should serve as an identifier of a legitimate military target.
	Yikes, man.
	Yikes.
	My friends, thank you all so much for hanging out.
	I'm going to gear up that Rumble raid for our friend Russell Brand.
	You know, sometimes I check and it's like, you know, they're not live, but usually Russell's gearing up.
	Okay, I don't know if Russell is going live right now.
	So I don't know who is set to go live.
	See, that's what I said.
	That's what I said.
	Sometimes that happens.
	So usually we just check.
	We've got a pretty standard lineup.
	But I'm not sure if we have anybody else.
	I think we have Charlie Kirk, Stephen Crowder.
	I don't know who's going to be live, so...
	I guess we'll just check Russell one more time before we get out of here.
	And he has not appeared to be going live and doesn't look like we've got any word.
	So I guess we'll wrap it up there.
	Let's give a raid to our friend Charlie Kirk.
	I don't know if he's going to be staying live.
	Let's see, where's he currently at?
unidentified		Is he about to go live?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I think he's live now.
		We'll try to raid Charlie's way.
		Charlie's a good dude.
		He's a friend of the show.
		We're fans.
		Don't want to leave you guys hanging, so let's get it.
		Thank you all so much for hanging out.

▲