The Culture War #71 What Is A Conservative Woman? w/ Lilly Gaddis & Rachel Wilson
Host:
Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere)
Guests:
Lilly Gaddis @LLDDIISS (X)
Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy (X)
Producers:
Lisa Elizabeth @LisaElizabeth (X)
Kellen Leeson @KellenPDL (X)
Connect with TENET Media:
https://twitter.com/watchTENETnow
https://www.facebook.com/watchTENET
https://www.instagram.com/watchtenet/
https://www.tiktok.com/@watchtenet
https://www.youtube.com/@watchTENET
https://rumble.com/c/c-5080150
https://www.tenetmedia.com/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ladies and gentlemen, I hope you're having a wonderful Fourth of July weekend.
We've got a special episode of The Culture War here for you.
We're going to be talking about, well, I don't know how to describe it so much as perhaps the paradox of traditional women and conservative women online and all of the issues surrounding this.
The debate.
You've got a lot of these guys, I don't know if you'd call them red pillars or whatever, that have whole channels dedicated to why they don't like women.
They often get into debates with other women, but the interesting conversation there is prominent conservative women who advocate for traditional values, conservatism, but at the same time are unmarried, high-profile girlbosses who make millions of dollars seems to be a paradox.
I am not saying this intending to insult those women.
I'm saying, let's have a conversation about that.
So we got a couple of guests.
Would you like to introduce yourself first, Rachel?
And, you know, I just want to say, I love women, but they just did a study in that lesbians have the highest occurrence of migraines, which proves that dating women is fucking annoying.
No, but obviously I love women, I'm not a woman hater.
That's the other space, it's like there's the anti-woman...
That's the thing is, he doesn't really make fun of them.
husband is you know had a huge boost in his career basically going on these podcasts making fun of women and people love that you know people love that content which kind of blows my mind how much people like women to be made fun of well yeah that's the thing is he doesn't really make fun of them he simply asks questions that expose the fact that they don't know why they believe what they believe and they don't know why it is that they say the things that they say and do the things that they do so yeah that's like the newest popular thing that was like women saying dumb stuff on the internet
No offense, Lily.
I'm just saying, you know what I mean?
People do love those clips of whatever podcast where a woman's like, you know, I like my OnlyFans, and then they ask about their dad, and they're like, yeah, I've never had a dad in my life, and then it's like, boom, roasted, that's why you're on OnlyFans.
I'm not even hating on Lily, but it's funny how like people just love to see women say something and I'm a culture jammer and like a lot of people have made fun of you, Lily, but really and truly what you did is The biggest culture jam ever.
You took black culture and you said it as like a white, young, attractive woman.
And that's why I think that it was, you know, it was like so viral, right?
Because you're taking a culture that you're not allowed to say and you said it.
And that's why it works so well.
It's like me when I said, like, I love the Fouchy Ouchy.
Give it to me.
You know, you just kind of make something.
You lampoon them saying something like the word inward.
And it looks funny because it's a white girl delivering it.
Well, there's all these, like, bubbles of things that you can't talk about or things you can't say, and I think it's everybody's responsibility to go around and pop those.
We don't need that.
Those bubbles, that's like an infringement of free speech, ultimately.
You know, when it comes to the whole, like, N-word argument stuff, it's like, I come from a generation, you know, we don't say that because we're just trying to keep decorum, I guess.
There are some people that are like, you should be able to say a word, and it's like, yeah, I agree, like, descriptive use of words is totally fine, blah blah blah, but I try to maintain decorum, and so we don't need to create confrontation.
However, that being said, I challenge any liberal to go to a skate park.
Anywhere.
15 year old kids dropping n-bombs every other word.
And these are white kids, Latino kids, black kids, all to each other.
It does not mean what the older generation think it means to these kids.
And I'm not saying that's a good thing or bad thing, I'm just saying that's the reality.
Go to a skate park and listen to these kids talk to each other.
Do you think that's reactionary to several decades of overwhelming feminist propaganda saying that men are toxic, masculinity is bad, that you can't act in a manly sort of way, and now public school systems also treating little boys like pariahs and giving them ADHD meds so they have to sit still and be quiet like the girls and just highlight things and organize stuff, right?
Like, we've criminalized masculinity to a degree and I completely agree.
feminism front and center and made it the air we breathe.
So I think there's just a lot of reaction.
I think it's a reactionary movement like a lot of the other ones that we're dealing with right now.
I'll tell you what it was like for me when I was younger.
You know, I consider myself smart enough not to single out individuals, you know, maybe it's because where I grew up in the city or whatever.
I'm not going to blame some individual for the actions of society or the group.
We want to change society.
But it's fascinating growing up being completely broke or being homeless.
I'm homeless when I'm 18.
Nobody will hire me.
And then, so when I'm 16 and I go to all of the businesses in my neighborhood, what job can a 16-year-old guy get, right?
I don't know.
Clerk at a candy shop?
Ice cream shop?
Grocery store?
Guess what?
They don't hire guys.
They just don't.
It's overwhelmingly, at least when I was growing up, you go to a grocery store and say, hi, I'm looking for a job.
Guess what?
You find all the cashiers are girls.
There are some boys, you know, I'm not saying they don't hire at all, but it was like 75-25.
All of the shelving and the facing, 75-25 girls.
I went to Baskin Robbins and I'm like, I need a job.
Everyone there is a girl.
When I turn 18, what job can I get?
Manual labor?
Yes.
It pays nothing.
My friend's sister comes home one day, we're playing video games, it's like 11 o'clock, and she's got 200 and some odd dollars in cash.
And my friend's like, he was like, oh, how much did you make today?
And she's like, oh, like 230.
And then he was like, oh, wow.
And then I was like, you made $230 in one day?
She's a server at a pizza restaurant.
And I was just like, I just worked 11 hours.
I lifted 50,000 pounds and I got paid $40.
So, it gets really frustrating then, when all of that stuff is around you for these entry-level jobs, and then you are told it's your fault, you're the problem, and you have all the privilege in society.
That being said, you know, when you start getting older, guys start getting older, it starts to flip.
It inverts.
And, for whatever reason.
And then women start complaining about it.
So, you know, my thesis on this is, Society, because of like evolution and biology, all that, values women at young ages, obviously, because having babies.
Men have no value because they have no skills to provide, to protect or, you know, protect a family or generate value and resources.
So if you look at the scientific research, you see that a social value of men starts at the bottom and for women starts at the top.
You know, once I hit 30, my life did actually get better.
But, you know, I also think the, and I guess this is different than the point you're trying to make, but to what Rachel was saying, when it comes to men and women, the digitization or the digitalization, I don't know what the word for it, the dating pool, I think that's what's making it so hard to make connections because we said this last night on your show.
The dating apps are so toxic and superficial where people are just swiping and the girls get hit up way more than the guys so it kind of makes men Mad at women.
I don't know how else to describe it because they're sending all these messages and women are playing them.
These women are getting like so many more messages.
So I think like dating and this dating world that we have this modern dating world is why men are starting to hate women so much.
And I think that's why men like that content where women get lampooned.
Yeah, I think it's a lot of what you were just saying, but also, so all of these things combine and then you'll get a guy who has got a frustration for one reason or another and then a YouTube channel pops up where they're like, did you know women be dumb?
And the guy's like, yeah, you know what I mean?
And it's like, people got to get out into the real world.
You got to, you got to go that, you know, you're talking about these dating apps and this is, this is, this is why they made Bumble.
Women on Tinder, they open their mailbox or inbox or whatever it's called and 17,000 messages and they just scroll through and look for a guy who's got an attractive picture and then hit it and see what he says and then respond.
Men swipe on every single woman.
They don't care what she looks like and cross their fingers that one of them swipes back.
I think we do have a gynocentric social order right now, which we did not have for all of prior history.
And to have things so radically inverted in less than a century, it's not surprising to me that psychologically people don't know how to deal with that and can't keep up with it.
And it's just everything about daily life is so radically different due to this massive wave of feminist propaganda that started late 60s, The CIA funded and pushed a lot of it through the Congress for Cultural Freedom, through Operation Mockingbird.
Gloria Steinem was recruited out of Smith College to push the feminist agenda, and they used CIA money to fund Ms.
Magazine and a number of other pop culture phenomenons that came out of the 70s, like the Stepford Wives movie and the Mary Tyler Moore show, a lot of this kind of stuff.
It was to kind of convince suburban average American women that being at home, being a mom, having babies was like oppressive and holding you back and don't you want to go out and have a career and have an exciting life?
Well, that's what ended up happening because Nelson Rockefeller chose Sandra Harding to push feminist epistemology.
Standpoint theory is what it's called.
It's kind of the root of all the critical theory stuff that permeates the universities now.
But the reason they liked it was because you can use standpoint theory, which says there is no objective truth.
There's no objective timeline of history.
We can kind of create it to be whatever we want.
So that's how you get this transgender stuff.
You get a lot of these, uh, everything is a social construct, very Marxist, but the Rockefellers liked it because you can use it in whatever direction you want.
So they don't really care about capitalism versus communism or West versus East, they care more about propaganda, mind control, and pushing public opinion in whatever direction they need to.
That's why you'll see, like, you talk all the time about how the left and right are so different now than they were even 20 years ago.
Like, the pro-war version, you know, of the liberal left is now what the right is saying, you know.
But it just makes everything so fluid and easy to push around.
And they wanted the other really obvious reason to push feminism is you get all the women out of the home and into the workforce, you have twice as many incomes to tax.
You have kids that are in daycares and state run schools where you can give children the values and the history that you want to give them.
I don't think the tax thing, the double taxation thing is is correct, because if you have singular income homes, the buying power you're taxing is the same.
And so it just led to rapid inflation.
It strained the workforce.
I love this.
There's this graph that lefties like to show, where it's like right around the end of the 70s, you see inflation keep going up, but wages stay the same.
And they're like, what was this all about?
This is because they were going after unions.
And it's like, no, that's when women entered the workforce.
Why do you think suddenly in the 1970s we saw this huge number of women enter the workforce?
Like they just organically decided they loved careerism?
Or do you think it had something to do with all the propaganda telling them that you need to have an education and have your own money because if you don't you're vulnerable and your husband can abuse you?
But we have to get a bit more reductive because while what you're saying is absolutely true, where does this come from?
And I blame men.
Weak men.
Men are weak.
Men continually grow weak.
And an element of what's going on with the feminism... I'll mention a lot of what we're seeing is really, really bad.
Like, no-fault divorce.
It just basically meant marriage is over.
It's like, you're dating now.
That's it.
You're dating with a special placard from the government, but you can just leave at any moment.
That's ridiculous.
And these are bad things.
You know, all these guys that are watching these anti-women channel, like, I, you know, I try not to be a dick to people who want to figure out how to better their lives.
Like, if I see a guy going to the gym, I'm going to tell him, like, and he's fat and he's overweight or whatever and he's struggling, I'm going to be like, bro, you got this.
You know what I mean?
So I see these guys who are watching these channels and part of me is just like, That's stupid.
But I'm not gonna hand on a guy who's actively investigating.
They may not understand completely, but they're like, why is this thing happening?
And where are the strong men to lift the burdens and the heavy rocks to make good stuff?
So here's what I'm saying.
You've got a bunch of guys that are sitting online Overweight.
And again, I'm not making fun of everybody's overweight, saying everybody's overweight is a failure.
I'm saying you've got guys who are not trying to better themselves, who are not trying to exercise, who are not cleaning the Cheetos off their mustache, who aren't... Hey, Tim.
For one, we can go back 100 years, 200 years, and talk about suffrage and it was weak men across the board who kept bending the knee and could not maintain social order.
They just gave up.
But I look at today and I'm like, well, look, it's interesting.
A society has emerged because men became weaker and weaker.
They could not provide for what women wanted, and they could not provide stability in social order.
And now you have these fractured systems where young men sit around complaining on the internet, removing themselves from the dating pool, complaining they can't get in.
Meanwhile, I know dudes who are swimming in women, and they're short.
And they're wealthy.
Because these guys are like, here are the cards I'm holding in my hand, I am going to figure out how to maximize my capabilities with this.
If, you know, you look at the...
A lot of these channels like to highlight these dating apps where women, they only want the top 20th percentile of attractive men, and so that means 80% of men are just out of the dating pool.
And I look at that and I'm like, sucks for you, I guess, dude.
I don't know how many times you gotta read Jordan Peterson's book to figure out you don't just get to exist and get a woman.
Like, you know, there was one I was watching, um, I'm gonna shout him out, Homaf.
Because credit goes to him, despite the fact I'm being so... Right.
That means it's very, very hard to be a one woman.
- That's true. - Right, so a one woman is like a barren, mentally deficient, limbless autist in a nursing home.
And to be fair, there are men who will abuse that poor creature, you know what I mean?
So, even in that regard, but my point to Home Math was like, men are not ranked based on appearance.
If you're a guy and you think that your number rating is based on appearance, you've not done any of the reading.
Right.
The Science of Sex documentary from a long time ago, they took pictures of 10, no, I think it was like 100 men and 100 women, and then they had people come in a lab and rate them on a scale of 1 to 10 for attractiveness.
They then took those pictures out into the streets and said, here's a picture, went to a woman and said, here's a picture of a guy.
How would you rate this guy on a scale of one to 10?
Guess what?
The tall guy in the flannel with the rugged good looks and the wavy hair, they were like, nine, 10, ooh, nine.
And then they did, they showed this frumpy, chubby guy with thin hair and glasses and, you know, ugly.
And the women were like, ooh, five, four.
Then they added biographies.
They made the guy in the flannel a manager at a theater who made $35,000 a year.
They made the fat guy a software engineer who made half a million a year.
These people, they always contradict themselves with their logic.
Like, they want women to be a stay-at-home mom or whatever.
But in order to do that, you gotta have somebody who at least can bring in enough money to make that possible.
You know, like, I feel like women are mostly... Women don't really care about... I don't really care about looks so much.
You're just looking more for somebody who's competent.
You feel like, okay, you're going to be, you're somebody I can actually trust.
Like you've got your, you know, you've got it together.
You can lead the family.
And then somebody who has the ability to work or will work.
It's not really so much the money.
It's the ability.
Will you go out and work?
So I don't think throwing, I think throwing women under the bus for that is kind of stupid because it's ultimately like biology forcing them to, to choose somebody based on, you know, we think this person can allow me to stay at home and raise kids.
Well, I think the problem we have now is that's great if women do have, like Lily said, the intention of being moms, having kids, and they want a man to provide because they're going to have a family.
But the issue we've run into now is that that's not what most women want to do.
The average woman is having like 1.6 children now.
The average first age they have a baby is like 30 or 31.
So I don't know about the body count, but it's just like, if women wanted those things from men for the purpose of having a family, I think that's fine.
But sadly, they don't seem to want to do that.
So now it's, or they wait until they're like 35 and they're like, well, now I want to have a child.
And as a result the United States for the first time has a rising maternal mortality rate due to the advanced age of first pregnancy and pregnancies in general.
So it's like we're kind of at this weird impasse where if women want men for resources but you're also a career boss babe who has her own money and you got your own bag and you don't need a man for anything then You can see why dating isn't working for people.
At the very beginning, why everybody's getting stupid because, you know, all the idiots are just having babies and then the people that are smart and that, you know, don't want to waste their money only have one baby.
And that's literally what's happening in society today.
And it's just Venezuelan immigrants having like 10 kids to come up to the border.
And, you know, Tim and I would not have 10 kids, you know?
The only way to get a headstone on your grave, if you were a man, was to die in battle, and if you were a woman, was to die in childbirth.
And the reason I bring that up is not that we should literally follow that, but it's to show how a society valued having children.
Women were seen as heroic warriors for having children.
Men were worthless unless they died fighting to protect their families.
And then what we have now is, I blame men.
Because I think you said this last time you were on the show, that equality—you said something like, equality is the choice of men if at any point men decided—do you want to elaborate on that?
Well they just they tend to be so like think of Bill Gates right not the most alpha dude but very smart became very successful and wealthy and rich and it's kind of it becomes revenge of the nerds to a certain degree I think where it's like they For that type of guy, it's advantageous to have women's liberation because that's how those guys, at least they thought, were going to get this sex with no strings attached if we do this sexual liberation stuff.
And what they are finding out is that's not the good deal that they thought it was.
For the top 20th percentile, they're getting free sex whenever they want with no responsibility.
And feminism has greatly benefited a lot of guys, like the top 20%.
Now, they can sit around all day doing nothing while women go work and produce value and do labor, come back, Preach about how liberated they are, give the guy free sex, and then the guy says, why buy the cow when you get the milk for free?
And you have this giant bottom-of-the-pyramid group of guys, like you said at the beginning, who are feeling left out and like they're never gonna get a girl.
Well, the situation in general is not sustainable for like multiple reasons.
You have the conversation you guys had last week about how all these girls thinking jumping on OnlyFans and making money that way is a good thing, but it's having every girl be an Instagram model or a sex worker produces no actual value.
There's nothing of value being actually produced in the economy.
It's just money that's getting recycled from people who actually are producers.
And combined with the super low birth rates, we're already seeing like logistical problems, supply chain problems.
You have Japan and Canada, you know, euthanizing the elderly because there's more people in diapers that are old than young.
It's not a sustainable situation and the correction is gonna suck.
There's multiple ways it could happen, but none of it's gonna be fun.
Well this is the one thing it's like women in the workforce I do think that obviously some women just want to be a stay-at-home mom but some women want to work you know I mean I don't think it's just all feminism I mean I think that plays a big part of it right but don't some women want to do something like artists creative types like you work technically right?
So, and this is probably, most traditional women are not doing what you're doing.
They're probably not writing books.
They're probably not putting themselves out there online.
So, it's like, it's kind of a weird situation where, of course, you just want to be tried and stay at home, but at the same time, you do get joy from grinding and working.
I see that's the thing I really don't the grinding stuff that's what I could be doing a lot more and everybody's like why isn't your YouTube bigger and why don't you post more and why don't you do more and I'm like because I still have two kids that are teenagers so they don't need a ton as much time as they did when they were little But there's still the priority.
And so is my husband.
Taking care of my husband is a priority.
I assist him with everything he's doing first.
And this is like my side thing that I do when I do have time.
And sometimes there will be two months where I don't have time for it.
The only reason I say that is my mom never worked and she hated working and I kind of wish my mom did work a little bit so she had some fun and did something because she just dealt with me.
I don't know if you do something you love it can be fun like I love my job thank God but I'm just saying I'm not saying all women should work but I don't think that if a woman wants to have a career that is a bad thing.
I would say, like, the thing is, it's kind of a rock and a hard place for, like, the single people.
Like, we're not talking about moms right now.
Like, what are you supposed to do if you don't find a good guy who even wants to get married?
Because, like, My, like whenever I went to college, you first of all, you get really excited like freshman year because you're like, man I'm gonna like get a boyfriend and then I'll get a husband because that's what you're raised thinking.
You always think you're gonna find your person there and then you quickly realize that first freshman year, ooh, people don't want to date.
They don't, definitely don't want to get married.
So then, you know, you graduate, you get a job.
It's even harder, like dating apps are weird.
Like you're not gonna find anybody quality on there.
I think we raise women and we tell them, focus the first 18 years of your life on getting good grades so you can get into a good school because you have to go to college.
I was told this all the time growing up.
You're going to go to college.
You have to go to college.
You're a loser if you don't go to college.
You've got to get a degree and you've got to have a career.
And so we tell women to do that, right?
And then they go to college.
They spend four to six years.
They get an average of $40,000 in debt.
They're 22 to 24 by the time they graduate.
And then you have to establish your career.
You didn't just spend 23 years of your life to suddenly stay home.
So it's like, well, I got to establish my career.
So they spend the next five to 10 years doing that.
And then we expect them at 30, 32, 35 years old to suddenly flip a switch, hurry up and get married, and have a buzzer beater baby at the last second.
And transition to staying home.
And that's super difficult for women on multiple levels, and it leads to a low birth rate, and it leads to a lot of women never getting married.
I would, I would rather you have any babies at all over no babies.
Absolutely.
But I think we give people backwards advice.
I think women should be focusing their fertile years on building their family.
And then once you're done with that, if you want to go off and do other things and have a career, I have friends who spent time while they were, you know, raising their kids to go to school very part time so that when the kids got much older and were about to leave, mom had a degree by then.
And then if she wanted to go do something, you know, in the workplace, she could.
I know, uh, I knew a couple people, and I'll keep the specifics for their privacy private, but these two people worked in the same career field, man and a woman, same age, they were friends, and they worked in entertainment.
The woman got pregnant and decided she wanted to have a kid in her early 20s, and the guy kept working.
10 years later, she's got a 10-year-old daughter.
Her career is exactly where it was when she got pregnant.
She had a kid.
She tried to keep up with it.
Dude was running his own company with dozens of clients, and she was salty about it.
She was jealous.
She was like, I had a kid, and now this guy is doing all these really, really amazing things.
And my response to her was just like, why are you mad?
That's what life is.
Like, there will never be Equality between men and women.
Thank you.
Legal equality?
No, no, of course, of course.
Civil equality?
No, no, no, no problem.
I still don't believe that'll happen, but that can be written down.
That's different.
But the idea that a man and a woman who are identical in every single way, and they're working at a FedEx, right?
All they gotta do is stack papers and ship them out.
Anybody can do that job.
It's a no-brainer job.
And then, both decide at 22, hey, we want to have kids.
The woman says, I must take time off of work to have kids.
The guy says, my wife's pregnant at home.
That's it.
The fact that women have kids means, even if the woman works through her entire pregnancy, and only takes off the minimal amount of time, which is what, a couple weeks?
Now, I do think guys should take time off to help their wife with their kids, you know what I mean?
But this imbalance means that there are a lot of women, especially now with our degenerate society, where a guy will get a woman pregnant and be like, I ain't doing nothing for you, and leave.
And the woman's gonna be like, I have to, I can't do anything, I have a kid and I'm not getting rid of it.
They go along with, like, you were saying, you know, my mom had five kids and people always, like, gave her shit.
Like, oh, how do you support your husband?
Like, you're almost shamed for not working, you know?
And then you're weird if you've got a lot of kids.
So, the way to fix that is you, A, Like you were saying men have to take responsibility and actually want that because a lot of guys now like definitely don't want to stay at home mom like they expect you to work you know like we got to fix that and then we also have to like fix the the culture to where it's not where it's a good thing like you were saying you have to venerate the housewife that has to be a good thing not an embarrassing shameful oh you're some like hick in the woods with ten kids.
90% of automotive service technicians, electricians, construction laborers, truck drivers, plumbers, pipefitters, steamfitters, machinists, software developers, general maintenance, and first-line supervisors of production and operating workers.
84% men.
Yes.
You can see the polarization.
Now, here's the best part.
I said list the jobs with the highest rate of mortality with a percentage of men and women in that job.
Logging workers, 135.9 deaths per 100,000, 97% men.
135.9 deaths per 100,000, 97% men.
Fishing and hunting workers, 86 deaths per 100,000, 98% men.
Aircraft pilots, 95% men.
Roofers, 99% men.
Refuse collectors, 95% men.
Drivers and truck drivers, 94%.
Farmers and ranchers, 92%.
Structural and steel workers, 99%.
Construction laborers, 96%.
Ground maintenance, 95%.
All of the top 10 jobs with the highest mortality rank, from highest mortality to lowest, only in the top 10, are all 95 plus percent male jobs.
I mean, I wouldn't mind if it's a transgen- She's real chatty, too, on the...
No, well, see, a male-to-female transgender pilot I would feel more comfortable with than probably just a woman.
No, I don't know.
Like, you were talking about Turning Point USA earlier, too, and I guess that was to my point where, you know, maybe it's like they're not giving the right leadership advice, but I would argue I think they are giving the right leadership advice because, I guess, different strokes for different folks.
I don't think there is one angle or one lifestyle that fits everybody.
unidentified
So that's why, I mean, that's why... Yeah, but that just sounds like mumbo-jumbo.
Women are choosing to do the same things they did prior to Women's Lib only now we get to pay for daycare to have some other random lady raise our baby while we work our retail job and we get to pay income tax and we get to finance a second vehicle and pay insurance on it so like the cost of mothers working versus what they actually bring home not such a great ratio not a very smart way to do things and it has had an effect on men's wages to some degree to have like this more gynocentric economy.
Aaron Clary has a great book that he just wrote about the effect of this female-centered economy and what the ramifications are.
So, I mean-- - It's a self-correcting force though. - Well, this is the point I guess I'm trying to make is obviously I think women, it's so important that they do get pregnant and have babies.
But in the black community, we've created a system where women get rewarded for having babies out of wedlock.
And so they're just having babies just to get more social services.
But out of wedlock births and welfare spending, if you plot them on a graph from 1960 to now, they go up like this in tandem with each other.
And why do we have so many out of wedlock births?
Because feminism pushed Birth control, abortion, no-fault divorce, sex out of wedlock as liberation.
Hey ladies, you should be having sex outside of marriage because that's freeing, it's liberating, you should be like the guys, you should stack bodies.
And that's why there's so many OnlyFans, though, is because there's not that nuclear family, and so these women have daddy issues, and so that's where they want to get their gratification by showing their boobs on there.
No, but I mean like so it's like it could be the same mom every year because she's cranking out a baby every nine months or whatever and it's like Cheryl once again with her seventh year in a row of having babies and they're all Irish twins like just endless she's working it but no you could do stuff like the success of the children success of the community so it's like a mom who raised kids and like does soccer practice or something and helped you know
They were on Instagram watching this prominent TikTok.
She had Tourette's and so the millions of young girl followers were watching her and developed Tourette's syndrome by watching her because women are social creatures.
It's one of the things they kind of found out through like MKUltra when they were looking at, you know, all the data that came out of that.
Women are very easy.
There's like this top little percentage and a bottom little percentage of women that are like super easy to propagandize and like almost impossible.
But most women are in that middle group.
Where, yeah, whatever they see repeated all the time is what they believe about the world, which is why your friend felt salty and jealous of her husband having this career because she's been raised in a milieu that says, you're behind, you're a loser, you're not- You're a man.
Yeah, you need to be competing with men in order to be considered a successful woman.
Well, and I think that's where the marketing's important.
Like, the right hasn't done a great job at marketing marriage to women.
You know what I mean?
Like, there's these fringe groups of, I don't know, the red pill movement maybe?
They kind of don't make it very appealing.
Like, say you're marketing a product.
You can have the best product ever, but if you do a terrible job marketing it and advertising it to people, no matter how great the product is, nobody's going to want to buy it.
Like, if you make marriage out like, no, you just stay home and you have kids and you have no life and you just serve your man.
If you say it like that, Obviously that doesn't sound very appealing, but if you're like, this is liberating.
You get to stay at home, you get to have your babies, you get to have your life, you get to have fun with your kids.
I think that's a big deal.
Like, we're not doing a great job marketing traditional marriage to people.
And you're not going to get in a lot of, like, college girls are not going to go for that, you know?
Well, the dream that feminism sells to women is that you're going to go to college and you're going to become a boss babe.
You're going to either have your corner window office where you are flying to Paris to close the deal over brunch, right?
Or you're going to be Taylor Swift or Beyonce and you're going to have an empire and be like a boss baby.
You're going to be Kylie Jenner and have this really successful cosmetic company.
And as we saw, that's not what happens for most women.
Most women end up being a retail manager.
Or, you know, an administrative clerk of some kind or something like that.
And we're supposed to think that's cool and better than being a mom.
But this is why, if we're going to talk about having conservative women or right-wing women in media, I think they should be promoting family, marriage, motherhood.
I don't think we need a women's leadership conference because I personally think men should be the leaders doing the leading, especially in politics.
I don't want female leadership in politics personally.
I don't know how you guys feel about that, but I see the TPUSA Women's Leadership Summit and I'm like, it's a bunch of pantsuit boss girls.
Most of them have no kids.
Most of them aren't married and they're going to do what for us on the right wing?
Well I think we're already seeing that like since the economy's bad like people are really struggling now you know you have to work really hard to even be able to just have it like a terrible apartment so and these bad times I feel like are starting to make people wake up like the girls are starting to reject that like even how you were saying how you see a lot of these girls making videos like why am I in the workforce and whatever
You know so I think bad times do bring people together and makes people a little bit stronger so we're probably I think we are seeing a little bit of awakening at least I've noticed it for myself just because of like the bad times do create you know like you were saying strong men.
Yeah I think men are male competition is going to sort things out to a degree on the men's side but I think on the women's side we used to have so I've been accused a lot online of Breaking the sisterhood, right?
Because now the sisterhood is we're all feminists, we all party and sleep around and do our boss babe thing, and if you kind of like break that, you're in trouble.
You're not part of the sisterhood.
But the sisterhood used to be, for all of history until the last few decades, hey, Look, we all have to stay somewhat chaste until marriage because that's how we get a good guy.
We're never going to get these men to, like, give us kids and a family and take care of us and provide for us if we're all out sleeping around giving away the milk for free, like Tim said.
So it used to be the women would self-police and kind of slut shame each other.
And because if three of the girls in town are going around sleeping with everybody, it ruins it for the rest of us.
Oh yeah, the Bolsheviks had a woman named Alexandra Kolontai who was their Minister of Social Welfare under Lenin, and she ran this mass de-veiling campaign in Central Asia where the Russian Empire still ruled at the time, you know, so they went to like Kazakhstan and different places where it was majority Muslim and all the women were veiled.
And they tried to convince them to take their veils and their burqas off in the name of liberation, and it was disastrous.
It had such a massive failure rate.
The women didn't want it.
The few women who did it got, like, beaten.
Things like this.
And they shamed her out of there.
Like, they kicked her out.
They didn't want her or her silly program in their country at all.
They completely rejected it.
And she was like, "I don't understand.
"I'm helping you, I'm liberating you." And they didn't want any part of it.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony in their memoirs both said that the primary obstacle to suffrage was not men at all, but women.
Women were to content.
It wasn't because women liked being enslaved.
It was because they said, we already have everything we want under male suffrage.
We can be educated if we want to.
We can work if we want to.
But we're going to lose all the privileges and protections we are now enjoying if we have this women's liberation stuff.
Look, if there's some dude who's like a normal average guy, but like let's say he's a little 5'7", walking down the street with a briefcase and a suit, and some large woman comes up and just clocks him in the face, I expect him to stand up and protect himself.
So what I'm saying is, the reason why we say men shouldn't hit women, it's because of the generality of women tend to be smaller with less muscle mass and bone density.
But if So I agree, if there's a 5'5 woman who weighs 100 pounds and she hits me in the arm, I ain't gonna cry about it.
I'm gonna be like, lady, nice try.
But if a 6'5 She-Hulk walks up to me and swings at my gut, and I'm like, oh man, we got a fight on our hands, you know what I mean?
You're not gonna like... No, no, I'm gonna... If a big booty latina came at me with her frying pan, I still would... I would just block it and... Okay, I just gotta tell you, if a lady was swinging broken glass at me, I would run.
Too bad we can't invent a gun that can shoot, like, accountability at women, and then you wouldn't be physically hurting them, but they would definitely run.
I think we're in an inverted social order where there was built in control mechanisms to balance the power for both sides before and what feminism did was erase that and give women incredible amounts of unearned power that they don't know what to do with.
So I think, yeah, I do think there's like toxic feminism, femininity going on.
I just think that, you know, in this society that we live in, it's changing, that women are being toxic, and that's why men probably want to have an artificial intelligence girlfriend and just crank it to Pornhub all day.
Yeah they could but as far as like providing for the family and things like that so there's this suffrage poster I always post to social media from New York from like 1912 or something where it showed privileges for women under suffrage and it said that in the state of New York prior to suffrage only men could be held liable for debt in a marriage
And even if the woman came in with money, so say you were an heiress and you married like a middle class guy, um, even if that was the case, you came in with your own money.
It was still considered your money.
And so if you owed money, so say you opened a credit account at Bloomingdale's in New York and the wife ran up charges at Bloomingdale's, she couldn't be held liable for the debt.
Only the husband could.
So that's the reason they didn't have it in their name, but they were usually authorized users on all their husband's accounts.
I think it should be, we need to pass a law that says what we're going to do is the federal government is going to deploy individuals into the hearts of every major voting jurisdiction and they're going to ask people if they support women's suffrage We'll have a referendum on it, and if the answer is no, we do away with it.
I show them that and I'm like, if you don't want to be this, you better, yeah, there you go.
unidentified
Recent polls have shown a fifth of Americans can't locate the U.S.
on a world map.
Why do you think this is?
I personally believe that U.S.
Americans are unable to do so because some people out there in our nation don't have maps and I believe that our education, like such as in South Africa and the Iraq everywhere like such us and I believe that they should our education over here in the U.S.
should help the U.S.
or should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be able to build up our future.
The average guy thinks teenage girls are the most attractive, and people don't know this, but for a long time, the models you'd see, like, you go to the mall and you see, like, the lingerie store and there's, like, a woman with her, like, bra strap coming down?
But something interesting happens when you ask questions, guys don't, the reason why it goes up to 22 on average is because teenagers are incapable of supporting a family.
So men want They want, predominantly, good genetics, which is seen through symmetry in the body, but if the man finds out the woman is really stupid, her attractiveness drops way down.
It really is true.
Now, there are probably a bunch of guys that are like, don't know, don't care, because I get free sex.
If the thought process for a lot of these guys is, I have zero responsibility, then they're going to be all over South Carolina.
But if you were telling a guy, You have a kid, it's your responsibility to be like, not with her!
Are you nuts?
I'm going to ask her where she put the milk and it's going to be in the cabinet under the sink.
Yeah, my husband actually said that one of the things he likes best about me is that if he has to go somewhere, if he's busy, because he's very work focused and he's like a total workaholic.
But he's like, look, you're very competent, and I don't worry.
I don't worry about having to be focused on work because I know that you can handle everything and you've got it down.
So I think that's a big draw.
I think it's really helpful.
But we're training women to be competent at all the wrong things.
So we wanted to talk about the e-girls today, didn't we?
The right-wing e-girls and this phenomenon of like- The paradox.
Yeah, the paradox of, Having a girl in a bikini selling coffee or beer or being on a calendar.
But what we shouldn't do is take those women, and I got into some trouble at the beginning of the year with a certain person who was baking a cake about this too, right?
We shouldn't take those women, push them to the front, and make them like the political mouthpieces for the right wing.
Because if you were to be like, hey, what's the Fourth Amendment?
What I'm saying is it's fine to have a girl be a model.
We know that models sell products.
Hot girls sell products.
That's fine.
I'm not against that.
I'm not jealous of beautiful women or any of that stuff.
I'm saying don't automatically equate them with whatever your right-wing movement is because I don't think it's actually a good look for you because they don't.
My point early on about the paradox of the trad personalities, these women who are like, women should be mothers and at home and check out my company for which I'm a millionaire with a million followers.
I'm unmarried and I live in, you know, like there's a lot of, there's a lot of, it's a, it's, it's paradoxical.
It is.
I don't know what the answer is.
I don't know who's right or wrong.
I know many women who advocate for traditional values and they are single, wealthy girlbosses.
Yeah, and I think this is how we end up with a conservative right wing, which by the way, because of this, I don't call myself conservative or traditional, because nobody knows what tradition, and we haven't conserved jack crap.
So I say I'm a Christian Patriarchist, which is something of a redundancy, but it lets you know what my beliefs are.
I think we end up with a right-wing Republican Party where all of the famous people are Caitlyn Jenner, Lauren Boebert, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Rick Grinnell.
We end up with women and gays and You know, all these people that you wouldn't think would be pushing traditional American conservative values because we're like, well, we have to appeal to everyone.
We have to have a big tent and we, everybody likes pretty girls and this gay guy is really cool.
So we're going to put, so it's like, what we, how are we different from the left?
It's a unit party now.
How are we different from the Democrat party?
We're just like the same social liberals, but with like a little bit less taxes or we love corporations more.
My issue with only men voting is that half of guys are dumb as a box of rocks.
And so George Carlin famously said, think about how stupid the average person is.
Now realize half of them are stupider than that.
With greater male variability, are you familiar with?
Yes.
You guys are familiar with greater male variability?
Guys tend to vary more across the board on every subject relative to women.
Women tend to be stable, men tend to vary.
So there's more weak men, there's more strong men, women are average.
There's more stupid guys, there's more smart guys, women have a tighter bell curve.
So imagine this.
Most women, so we're talking half the country, and let's say, you know, 65-70% of them are of average intelligence, and then you have men where half are above average and half are below average, and then without universal voting, you have a large portion of women who are smarter than really dumb guys, and those dumb guys are voting.
That might still be a problem, but I think everybody's probably seen the maps, the graphs that show what would happen if you took women out of the voting pool.
You'd basically never have any left-wing stuff passing ever again.
So that's a factor.
And that's because even dumb guys prefer to have the ability to take risk for more gain.
They're not as security-oriented.
They're not going to be voting for a nanny state.
They're not going to be voting for open borders, that sort of thing.
There's a lot of ways you could fix voting, I think.
But the problem is now we've told everybody that universal suffrage democracy is the American way, which Tim would tell you is not how the country was founded.
And if you say only certain people should be able to vote now, you're called like an elitist or people will say, oh, you're not.
Well, I think it's good, like, if you let people... When you think about the single women that are tanking, you know, the vote, that are all voting liberal, it's because they don't have kids, they don't own property, they don't have any skid in the game, so what are they voting for?
Oh, abortion rights, you know, or, oh, they'll give me free money or they'll pay for my college.
So if you let only people who have, like, own property or have kids, they've got stake in the game.
Like, they're going to be voting for bigger problems, even though they're like, Oh, we don't like the guy, but he's going to push for initiatives that's going to help the country.
That's what I think.
I think only landowners and people with families should vote because they have a stake in the game.
It's not just, well, this guy supports abortions and I want to get my 10th abortion, so I'll just go with that guy.
I'm with you on the whole American system, and I get a ton of, you know, crap about that, too.
I think that we have like a liberal enlightenment founding that was going to end up here.
That's my personal opinion on it.
But since we have this illusion of there's a left wing and a right wing, and there is like among the actual population to a degree, there are people who believe a set of beliefs that are more progressive left wing and people who believe a set of beliefs that are more family oriented.
And I guess we would say like conservative or Christian.
And I just don't understand how Christian conservatives are being represented by people who are pushing the gay agenda, people who are pushing feminism, people who are pushing the trans agenda.
And we're going to just like wave them into TPUSA and be like, yes, have the boss babe conference, have the LGBT like big tent thing.
You've heard the stories about how, like, he hires a woman for, like, a high-level job, and then there's, like, some stories circulating where he hired some woman, and she came into the office, and there's, like, a bunch of guys sitting around the table, and they're, like, going over paperwork, and then she's, like, here's the latest, and it's, like, you know, girl boss, and then she's, like, I'll be back later with updates.
She walks out, and the guys are, like, you hired her?
I don't think you're going to get a representative because somebody who's truly traditional and at home working their ass off with their kids, they're not going to be on social media.
I guess I mean more like official party people and politicians so yeah I mean on the Republican right where we're supposed to be catering you know when I was growing up in the 80s and 90s it was like oh you got to cater to the evangelicals you got to cater to the Christian right-wing conservatives But we don't do any of that anymore.
Now it's like our side wants, we need a woman president.
We need women senators and female, the female governors that are supposed to be conservative.
Have you taken a look at any of them lately and how they behave and what they do?
These are not, it's, but why would we be surprised?
Why would we be surprised that when we hire a woman to govern a state, that it's going to turn out that she's like a hot chick who's divorced and, you know, making out with dudes in a theater or No, you are right.
Well, and she's another one that if you look at a picture of her ten years ago and now her entire face is Botox and fillers and she's gotten all this work done.
She looks like a Kardashian to me and I can't tell the difference policy-wise or PR-wise what the difference is between our right-wing conservative women And Hollywood leftist women, they seem the same to me.
They look the same, they talk the same, they act the same, they live the same kind of lifestyles.
So I'm just looking for like where's the representation for people like me that what I care about is my five kids and hopefully the dozen or so grandkids I will get from my kids if I'm lucky, lord willing, right?
I want a future for my kids and my grandkids and none of these people are helping me with that.
What if we got all the smartest and most successful people to just abandon their companies overnight?
Maybe go to a secret location of sorts where they could only live and work together and then let society fend for themselves and come up with some name for it.
Well, that would be fun, but to Rachel's point, I would say, and there's this old saying, idolizing politicians and celebrities is like thinking the stripper actually likes you, you know?
So it's like, what's the point of even idolizing anybody?
I mean, I guess you can be a fan of somebody, but you got to have that with a grain of salt.
I, you know, I kind of feel like the worst case scenario is just, we're riding the wave, the wave is going to crash violently into the shore, and the strong will survive.
Like the worst case scenario is, We sit here, we scream to the high heavens, save yourselves, the flood is coming.
We can't stop the flood, the flood is here, but we can build an ark.
All I try to do is, really the main purpose of why I'm doing everything I'm doing, my purpose for being present on social media, is because I get dozens of letters and DMs and emails every week from women who say, All I ever wanted was to be a mom and stay at home and raise my kids and everybody told me I couldn't do that.
Even my parents, you know, who are Christian conservatives said, you must go to college.
You've got to have a career first.
This is what everyone's heard for decades.
And they write me just to say, thank you for telling me and basically giving me permission to be a mom and to be a wife.
And that that's not only good enough, but that's awesome.
And it's like more, uh, Laudable than any career I was going to have.
It's more meaningful because they just don't feel like they can.
I had a woman write me and say I'm in my last year of dental school.
I'm supposed to start a dental practice and all I want to do since I met my boyfriend is get married and have kids.
That's all I want to do.
I dream about it all day.
It's all I think about.
I would rather die than go start a dental practice.
But my parents have invested all this money, and if I told them I was going to quit dental school, they would disown me.
They would not understand what do I do.
And so I'm just trying to make the case for women, because there's a lot of women who want that.
There's a lot of women who want that, and they just don't feel like it's permitted.
There is this common misperception that prior to the 19th, women were not allowed.
That we barred them.
That we said, you can only be a mom and that's it.
And that's completely not true.
Three chapters of my book are dedicated to debunking that as an idea.
Women have had higher literacy rates in this country since we started tracking it in 1790.
Women have always been able to work.
It was just that they tended to work like at home on the family farm or maybe in a shop.
Yeah, and they didn't want to.
And they still don't really want to.
It's just that if you tell them from the time they're an infant, and every TV show they watch, and every song they hear, and every movie they see, tells them, you must have a career.
The cool girls have jobs.
The successful women are entrepreneurs and business babes.
When there was no big industry, women worked, there's no question.
And so the idea of women in work or in the workplace happened as soon as men started leaving their homes for industry jobs, or industrial jobs.
So you have a farm, the guy's gonna wake up and he's gonna be like, I'm gonna go deal with the cows and the horses, and the mom's gonna be like, I'll get the eggs.
Yes, and this is why we didn't see a push for feminism until the Industrial Revolution.
That's the only thing that enabled feminism.
Before industrialization and technology, there was no concept of girl boss.
There was no feminism at all because it was a much different world where, you know, physicality mattered more and we were more attached to like our actual material reality of how food is produced, how everything is produced, right?
So now, Women think they're super cool and tough and equal with a man because they can go to their office job and they don't think about when they wake up in the morning and their alarm goes off.
A man built that.
A man created and launched the satellites that make their cell phone work.
Men keep the power lines up and the grid running.
Men made the road and the car that drive you to your job.
They work the air conditioning that keeps you cozy in your office, like all these sort of things.
It's all enabled by the world that men built, and women don't even think about that.
I've asked girls, like famously in multiple debates, asked young women, "Do you think that if the grid went down, there was some big disaster, there's a hurricane, a flood, something like this, and the power goes down, that we could get the feminists out there and they're going to get the power back on?" And they tell me yes.
They're like, oh yeah, girls could do it.
We have tools.
We have tools now.
I'm like, have you ever tried to run a jackhammer?
Wait, wait, I have to say this, Rachel, and you know this, there's a lot of lesbians at Home Depot that know exactly what the hell they're doing with a drill.
I'm not saying all women, but Alex Jones knows some of these.
And so opening pickle jars is a huge challenge for women, and that's why they need men.
Because without us, I mean, the pickles will never... But in all seriousness, the grip strength correlating with the operation of a jackhammer, for instance, the weight that you need to be able to maintain for that object, It's not like we're going to make a mini jackhammer.
Alex may agree with this for different reasons, but I've said...
If I am in a burning building on the third floor and I am laying on the ground and there's smoke everywhere and I'm gagging, when that door bursts open, I am hoping to God it's a six-foot-five, glistening, ripped man just flexing his muscles and he goes, Hey there, buddy.
I'm getting you out of here.
unidentified
If a woman kicked the door open, I'd be like, No, that is true.
No, you're exactly right, because they had to lower all the requirements for the police academy for the females, for the women, because they couldn't go over the wall, they couldn't lift a thing.
So, if the average guy was in a burning building, the only woman they would want to see is their mom.
Because women get that superhero strength when their children are in danger, and your mom will lift you up by one hand with her muscles snapping as she carries you to safety.
And I'm half-joking, right?
Obviously no guy wants to see his mom in a burning building.
My point is, all of the stories where the mom lifts a car off her child, Destroying her arms and muscles to save the child?
That's amazing.
But, like, you're not gonna get that from the average woman.
You get that from your mother, who will die for you.
And then guys just tend to be stronger.
But, man, these stories really are amazing, where... Like, I mean, and you've heard them, too.
Like, a car hit the kid, and then the mom lifted the car up, and then the kid got out.
Yeah, you hear that story a lot, where they get superhuman strength.
I mean, I think we agree on most things, Rachel, but I guess when we look at the future, this is what they say is going to happen if there's no rapture, is that we will all be one race and one sex.
And that sex would be like trans, basically.
It would probably be women with a female vagina that act outwardly like men and then they just have like men semen and they just, you know, I guess artificially inseminate themselves.
That's if like we live to a million years in the future.
Yeah, it is happening, but there's a couple theories.
One is, in our limited understanding of the Y chromosome becoming smaller and more frail, the immediate assumption was, well, eventually it'll be nothing.
But there's actually a hypothesis that it just changes rapidly from smaller to larger, and it's really just that men evolve faster than women.
So the Y chromosomes change in shape recently is just greater male variability.
Women tend to remain stable and average.
Men change based on the circumstances required.
And it really is what women require to survive what men can provide.
And then they choose men based on that, which, you know, is what we get.
But I would not be surprised if because of microplastics and endocrine disruptors, but also technology, the future is men and women look identically.
There will be a sexual distinction between the two, but very very subtle.
I wouldn't be surprised if in like a thousand years, men and women are both on average 5'4".
Ultra frail, thin bodies, gaunt faces, no hair, and their genitals are just... Atrophied.
Yeah, and not even used, especially considering artificial womb technology, virtual reality.
This is actually a plot point of Stargate SG-1, if you guys have seen it.
SG1's an amazing show, but basically they're aliens, and they're the most technologically advanced, and they've advanced beyond the point where they can sexually reproduce, so they can only reproduce by cloning, which has resulted in their genetics decaying to the point where they're on their last iteration of being able to genetically engineer themselves, or to clone themselves, because their genetics have failed.
Weirdly enough, a lot of the people that, this is another thing I document a lot in my book, which is why it's called occult feminism, because a lot of the people that funded and pushed feminism were wealthy elites who had various proto-transhuman beliefs.
A lot of them were like proto-New Agers or Baha'i faith or any number of like occult-style religions that believe in a one-world religion, that everybody has to return to the monad, right?
We all have to go back to being one, and that's why we have to embrace the goddess worship stuff and everything, because they wanted a human future where men and women are basically the same and androgynous.
And we transcend sex differences because they have this fundamental idea that during the fall is when male and female became like when we became sexually dimorphic.
And then we have to go back to having like just a unisex beige blob of humanity with a one-world government and a one-world religion, and that's what they wanted.
Margaret Fuller was writing about this in the 1840s.
A very prominent early American feminist writer.
So a lot of these people did want that.
Alice Bailey, who helped create a lot of the UN programs, the early UN programs, believed this.
And so a lot of their policy was actually aimed towards enabling that.
They thought it was inevitable, but they wanted to help it along and accelerate it.
Genesis 11, verse 9, the Tower of Babel, if you flip that, that's 9-11.
It's just weird.
You know the story about Nimrod wanting to build a tower to the kingdom of heaven and God made everybody speak different languages and they all broke up and that's what's happening today is that reverse engineering of that and I think that's like a satanic demonic rule like basically Nimrod ruling us so that is what they want they want us under one currency one you know no borders one country that rules them all so yeah I agree with you on that.
I think it's a good example, though, because the Tower of Babel just fell.
You know, it just didn't work, and then God dispersed everybody.
But, like, even when you see, like, most societies, like Rome fell.
It was really high, got really technologically advanced, much like how we are now, and then it fell apart.
Because I think It's its own destructive force.
You know like how we were even saying how with all the technology and advancement people are off the homesteads and now we're at the workforce and that's where all the problems have come from.
So all the advancement is almost its undoing in the end.
Like that ends up crashing the whole thing and then we start back from the bottom up.
Funny enough, did you guys know that Elizabeth Cady Stanton and two dozen other feminist activists from the late 1890s wrote something called the Woman's Bible?
You can still buy it on Amazon right now.
And they went through and edited the entire Bible and took all of that out.
They took out Eve being at fault.
They took out the curse in Genesis on the woman.
They just changed all the patriarchal stuff in the Bible that they didn't like.
And in the foreword, Stanton says herself, now remember, these were all supposed to be Christian women, but if you dig a little deeper, none of them were.
She said, look, if I could just eradicate the Bible from the face of the earth, I would do it.
But I can't.
It's the most popular, most influential book there's ever been, and too many people believe in it.
So instead, we will just subvert it.
We'll change the meaning.
We will do some social justice Christianity, which was very popular at the time.
And they wrote this woman's Bible, and it actually had a huge effect on a lot of the churches around the turn of the century.
And people don't even... Everybody wants to know, why are the churches so feminized?
That book was so popular that they had multiple printings in, and we're talking 1895, so this stuff is not new.
Like, this has been around for a long time, and it was intentional to, like, feminize Christianity and convince people that the Bible was written by men, and it's just a tool of the patriarchy to keep women down.
So I told Seamus Coghlan, you know, because he put the Irish cutout behind him a lot, I said, put a rainbow behind you.
And he's like, oh, I think that'll send the wrong message.
And I was like, you lose.
It's lost.
You're outright saying that a symbol of your religion for thousands of years, representing God's covenant to the earth to never flood it again, You've lost it.
You can no longer display a symbol of your faith because you're scared people will think it's associated with something degenerate.
Fake news was created by the media to attack Trump, and Trump and media were like, no, you're fake news!
And then now they're like, stop, stop calling us that.
So don't let them take the rainbow.
I say, you know, all these rainbow things that are being painted on the ground, Christians should go out there and make them symbols of Christianity and God's covenant, and then watch the left freak out and be like, that's not what it means, that's not what it means!
And they'll be like, you've painted the symbol of God's love, yay!
Well, this point is a little out of left field, but the Bible talks about Nephilim, these giants.
And, you know, supposedly a third of the angels were casted out of heaven, came down to earth, and, you know, made it with humans, and they made these giants.
And that's supposedly, I guess, why God had to flood the earth and kill all these creatures.
You know, that's what they say.
And I kind of tend to believe that.
And the rainbow should be a pride flag that we killed a bunch of giants.
And now, with the population decline from industry collapse, what do you think this country's going to look like when you have fertility population decline?
Everything's going to be like Michigan.
Our cities are going to be... I mean, man, it really is crazy when you look at how many buildings are abandoned.
Imagine going to New York and it's just a bunch of empty, decaying buildings.
You look at Detroit, you look at Flint, you look at Gary, Indiana, and you see these houses that are just falling apart.
Imagine a skyscraper.
In New York City.
Like not even a crazy big one, like 20 stories and it's just busted out windows.
Like, Charlestown here is doing good for a small town, but I spend a lot of time in East Texas and stuff, and I mean, I feel like a lot of those small towns, you go to their main street, or you go to like the, you know, near the courthouse, and like, only maybe half the shops are actually leased out.
So I don't know, it's hard to get a- I feel like the small towns- Because, like, everybody goes to Walmart, like, you don't- Yeah, that is true.
But it is weird though, because you would think that these towns would be bustling now when we're getting all these immigrants and all these people are changing their life and moving out.
But it's like, I just don't see it when I go to those small towns.
And I think what'll happen is the only people who are gonna have kids are those kind of people, right?
The people who are homesteading, the people who are homeschooling, doing traditional Christian stuff, and rejecting the woke stuff, the girlboss stuff.
It was the Great Famine followed by the Black Death.
But there are things that are happening now that are probably going to result in people losing their lives, being unable to have kids.
So I don't know if they look back at this as the black death, like COVID, come on.
They say, oh, all these people died from COVID, and it's like, did they?
You know, look, a lot of people died from COVID.
I'm not saying that's not true, but I'm saying you had that viral video out of Illinois where it was like the Secretary of State, or no, there was a chief medical officer of Illinois saying, Our records show dying with COVID, not from COVID, so be careful you don't conflate that.
And we see a lot of the media conflating dying with and dying from.
But that being said, I think the bigger plague that could lead to a renaissance is going to be like microplastics in the testicles, endocrine disruptors.
I'm going to shift a little bit because we only have a few minutes left, but right now the Magic the Gathering Pro Tour Modern Horizons is on.
This is a new Magic the Gathering set that came out a couple weeks ago.
I don't really care to talk about Magic the Gathering in and of itself.
My point is, this is a massive industry, gaming, and the guys are all morbidly obese.
And I'm looking, you know, so I'm looking at these notifications, because I love Magic, and my bigger concern is a professional industry with all of these very interested guys spending millions of dollars collectively.
I mean, some of these, if you're playing like one of the older sets competitively, Vintage, a deck can cost you $100,000 to be tournament legal.
So these are guys who have money, are successful, and they're morbidly obese and unkempt.
And I'm just like, Why?
Like, why?
Come on.
You know, like, we've got to have that... You know that video where all the guys are swinging from monkey bars in the 50s and they're all like... We gotta do that.
It's crazy for me to see professional, successful men in a top league with prizes in the millions of dollars just completely not taking care of themselves.
Well, in Hollywood, that's usually what they do, is like, the waist, like, it'd be like, if you're over 36 waist, it doesn't matter your BMI, you're too fat.
You know, that's kind of how the waist size is a good measurement.
Well, we gotta get men, like, we can sit here all day and be like, oh, women in the workplace, and these things happen, and I just go back to like, men.
Men need to work harder, men need to lift more, men need to assume their responsibilities, and I'm not saying it's fair, or I'm not saying there's, like, women don't have privileges, it's not gonna, I'm saying, At the very least, any guy who's upset and trying to figure this out should be in shape.
I agree with you totally, but I mean, part of what caused this, like why?
Why do men just not care anymore?
And part of it is like the same Bolsheviks I was telling you about wrote extensively about how men, we have to neutralize the men.
We have to get rid of the patriarchy.
Why?
Because that's where private property is passed down through, that's where businesses and legacies are passed down through the man.
We can't have that.
Men need to be, if they're going to do anything, it needs to be for the state, right?
And then eventually for the commune when we abolish the state.
This was their idea.
And so they said the reason we need feminism and to push all the women into the workplace and get rid of marriage, they wanted to, they actually had like no-fault divorce early on in the Bolshevik regime because Colin Tai's idea was, if men don't know who their kids are, if men can't stay married and have a family, they don't have any motivation to build empires or legacies or own private property or accumulate cross-generational wealth.
And that's how we get rid of private property ownership.
You just disincentivize the men from building anything or doing any sort of greatness, right?
Just deter men from greatness because why do men do those things?
Like, Helen of Troy, they want the wife, they want the kids, they want their personal legacy that they want to build.
And if you take that away, I guess you get, like, fat gamer guys.
I mean, it's funny because for a long time people ragged on video games saying, like, what's the point of that?
And I'm like, what's the point of any sport?
Like, guys are competing against each other to be the best at a thing.
The problem is now, a lot of these games don't require any kind of physical mobility.
You know what I was thinking, though, too?
With, like, Magic the Gathering, I went to a card shop last week.
I've been playing since the game came out in, like, 1994.
Like, seriously.
Not, like, came out in 93.
And me and my friends have always been in shape.
It's a fun game.
It's chess and poker combined.
But always, the dedicated players are out of shape, morbidly obese.
I just want to say this, because again, it's not about magic, but if you're a strategy game player, you're an esports enthusiast, your game will improve if you get in shape.
This is not even a question.
Your brain function, your reaction time, will improve if you are in shape and you lose weight.
And when you're, like, Vocal Lessons 101, if you're going to be a singer, you're supposed to do a physical warm-up exercise for your whole body to get your blood flowing, because your vocal cords are no different.
And you need to warm up, otherwise you can injure yourself, same as anything else.
Simone de Beauvoir, the premier feminist philosopher of the 20th century, in a conversation with Betty Friedan in the 70s, they did an interview together, and de Beauvoir said, there cannot be such a choice for women as to stay home with their children.
We can't have such a choice precisely because if there is one, too many of them will choose that.
And I think she's right.
I'm betting on it.
I'm betting that if women have the choice to be mothers and stay home, that that's what they will want to do.
It would be so helpful. - All these conservatives are like, "I can't believe she just yelled F the patriarchy.
And then when I saw that video, I was like, I wonder what the song's about, and I pulled it up, and she's saying her loser boyfriend, who wasted her time, she's making fun of Jake Gyllenhaal, apparently.
I don't know everything about her, so like, Hannah Clare knew this better.
Because she actually knows the stuff.
The song is from 11 years ago or something like that.
She wrote an extended version a few years ago.
She's criticizing this guy for being a male degenerate who promised her a relationship and then abandoned her, wasting her youth.
It was, quote, F the patriarchy on his keychain.
She's basically saying, you're this loser male feminist guy who acted big and then and then like treated me like shit.
And then conservatives are like, like, guys, I'm not.
And Mary Morgan Morgan shout out.
She's on pop culture crisis.
She had a response to me saying, it's not about what the song's about, all the girls at the stadium were putting up middle fingers and yelling, fuck the patriarchy, literally.
And I'm like, that may be, but that's a product of the corporate press, not Taylor Swift.
Let Taylor Swift have her babies with Travis Kelce, and then write a song called, like, Mommy Dearest, where she says things like, the greatest joy I've ever known is holding the baby here in my arms, or whatever, and then watch all these young women be like, I agree!
Everybody now should start firing up the grill because it is... I love this week.
I was talking to my dad, like, what do we do for Fourth of July?
You know, do we go out to the country?
Do we go to the city?
Do we do, like, the city fireworks display?
And then I realized...
We do both.
Because there's a bunch of 4th of July celebrations, but then they're doing it Friday on the 5th as well, and on Saturday because it's a four-day week.
It's Thursday, Friday, Saturday.
So I'm like, oh, this is going to be fantastic.
So, of course, we've been off, but you guys should go enjoy time with your family and stop thinking about all the weird shenanigans and just hug your loved ones.
So we'll just, we'll wrap things up.
Rachel, do you want to shout anything out as we close out?
