Jules Jones dissects America’s accountability crisis, targeting figures like Prince Andrew (Epstein ties), Anthony Fauci (gain-of-function research and beagle experiments), and Letitia James (mortgage fraud) while praising Trump’s trade deals, judicial appointments, and Alcatraz reopening. She alleges FBI cover-ups in Epstein files, Seth Rich’s murder, and January 6, accusing the "deep state" of weaponizing law enforcement to protect elites. Polls reveal overwhelming support for defunding NPR/PBS as "Democrat propaganda," framing midterm elections as a referendum on justice—or its absence. [Automatically generated summary]
My name is Jules Jones, and on Saturdays, I go through the biggest political stories of the week.
If you are interested in news and politics, I recommend you follow our channel.
I throw a tea party every Saturday at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern Time.
I also encourage you to visit my website, JulesJonesLive.com, for updates.
You are tuned into a live feed of Washington, D.C., a city fueled by power, money, and an ego.
Big ego, and not necessarily in that order.
It's less a chess game and more of a full contact sport where players come armed with sharp suits and sharper agendas.
The players come with strategies, secrets, and the occasional poker face, exploiting every flaw in their opponent's game.
Every move is a gamble, every risk headline waiting to happen.
Some are seasoned pros guiding through the chaos like it's in their natural habitat, while others motivated by ambition or old-school political drama get checked faster than you can say filibuster.
In this town, winning isn't just the goal, it's the only thing that matters.
Everything else, totally negotiable.
It appears President Trump's next 100 days in office will be every bit as eventful as the first 100.
It's not slowing down.
Although we're all amazed and thrilled with the tremendous energy and success of President Trump and most of his cabinet, I think it's safe to say we're also feeling disappointment and frustration in a few key areas.
Specifically, when President Trump was elected, we all felt a great sense of relief that the corrupt political weaponization of government would stop and that people who actually had broken the law would finally be held accountable.
To be clear, our desire was for justice, not vengeance.
We simply wanted those who behaved as though they were above the law to answer for their crimes and to be held into account.
It simply hasn't happened.
A few days ago, we decided to name this show America Wants Accountability.
And since then, the glaring absence of accountability has become even more profound.
Let's list a few obvious examples of actual crimes, shall we?
The entire Epstein client list of pedophiles and rapists, including Prince Andrew.
Anthony Fauci, who killed people, tortured beagles, and lied under oath.
Letitia James, the fanny of the North, who committed obvious mortgage fraud.
The 51 spies who lied who intentionally misled the American public, election interference at its finest, the people who engineered the J6 set up, entrapment and weaponization of government, the entire J6 Unselect Committee, destruction of evidence and witness tampering, the corrupt Biden-era DOJ from Merrick Garland on down, including Psycho Jack Smith, treason.
Would you like to know what all of these criminal creeps have in common?
Not one arrest.
None.
Zero.
Zippo.
Zilch.
President Trump was indicted, arrested, booked, and tried multiple times on nonsense charges, and these actual criminals have not been touched.
If we're feeling frustrated right now, there is ample reason for it.
Our justice system is a disgrace.
Worse, if corrective actions aren't taken very soon, like now, confidence will be lost and that will translate into disaster in the midterm elections.
The grace period is over.
It's time for action.
To further add to the frustration, the video by James O'Keefe this week confirmed that Prince Andrew is a pedophile rapist.
We all knew that already, but it had never been confirmed before.
Where is the arrest?
On Thursday, the FBI finally announced an investigation into Letitia James for mortgage fraud.
This should be the shortest investigation in history because her signed paperwork speaks for itself.
She's guilty.
Where is the arrest?
Pam Bondi stated there were tens of thousands of videos of children being sexually molested and childborn, and yet there have been no arrests.
Don't wait until you curate all of the videos.
There are pedophiles loose.
Arrest them.
Certain Republicans in Congress continue to break ranks from the America First agenda to protect their own selfish interest.
We must primary them.
But it's frustrating in the meantime.
Despite all of this, there is still reason for optimism because we've got President Trump and most of his cabinet members who are truly fighting every day.
The US-UK trade deal, the very best part of this historic deal is that it drives a stake through the heart of every leftist Democrat and rhino naysayer who all said that tariffs won't work.
Tariffs do work, and this deal is the first of many.
The Trump haters won't admit it publicly, but this UK trade deal announcement has completely deflated them.
When Ed Martin was despicably blocked by Tom Tillis, President Trump appointed Janine Pirro as interim U.S. Attorney for DC, and he calmly placed Ed Martin into a powerful job within the Justice Department.
Christine Noam, she was a rocking congressional hearing stating, there's no scenario in which Kilmar Abrego Garcia will return to the United States.
I guess it had to be said.
Tom Homan and Stephen Miller are rock stars every day of the week.
Pete Hegsith is dismantling DEI and is getting the military back on mission.
Marco Rubio has been outstanding as Secretary of State.
And JD Vance is the most articulate and strong vice president in memory and is a powerful asset for President Trump.
Now, if only we could just hold the criminals accountable.
Top News Stories Hard Fit00:04:11
But first, a special thank you to all of our Rumble refugees for finding your way to a new platform.
I truly appreciate you.
Please remember, if you're ever having difficulty on one streaming platform or another, you can always go to julesjoneslive.com and see all of the platforms where we are streaming live.
You can check it out here.
We've got YouTube, X, Getter.
Unfortunately, Getter will not show up in my thread up here, but that's okay.
It's just because it's not native.
It's not on our end.
It's just the way their program is built.
we have that.
But all of these others, oh yeah, hit us up, Facebook, everything.
I mean, we're just spreading the word of what's going on with this government and this country like nobody's business.
And we love being everywhere.
We're reaching a whole entire new audience.
It's really working out great.
But thank you for being here.
Truly appreciate it.
And then we will go on into the show, which we start out with our regular first segments.
They're awesome, as usual, as you all know.
I mean, we've got so many things that are happening on the daily that it's hard to keep up with just one story.
So we've got, of course, the beginning, then, of course, the top 10 news stories, which all of you truly enjoy.
And it's always a fun one for us because trying to get that thing down is just like, I can't even describe it.
I don't know how Rob does it every single week, but he does.
He manages to get through it, but we're able to do that here.
Does a great job with all of that.
But we have our top news story countdown, which takes a more tongue-in-cheek approach to this week's mostly wonderful news stories.
We will review the current breaking news and X News for today.
Our what is wrong with these people.
I can answer that question for you plenty.
It is our segment showing just how the left has dumbed down our society.
And then our In Case You Missed It segment, which provides updates on stories from past shows.
I love having you all here at 3 o'clock p.m. each Saturday.
But if for some reason you can't be here or if you've missed any of our live shows, you can always watch them later by checking out the website and you will find it all there.
They're all listed, all the previous shows and everything that we're up to.
Then we'll spill the tea with today's show, which is America Wants Accountability.
And boy, do we want it.
I mean, it's long overdue.
Like I said, we've had the grace period.
That's over.
It's time to move on.
Following that, I will dish up some rumors from online chatter that you will not want to miss in our daily dish segment.
Then finally, we'll go over this week's question of the day, where you get to provide your answers in the show comments.
But for now, settle in, get comfortable with your beverage of choice as we begin this week's political rendezvous.
Let's spill some tea, shall we?
Here we have our top news stories.
I know it's hard fitting them into one segment.
Okay, so coming in at number 10.
Fauci Must Be Held Accountable00:04:27
Trump's NIA shuts down Final Beagle Lab, conducting painful experiments, ending Fauci-era cruelty and bureaucratic waste.
Anthony Fauci is evil.
Justice, in my opinion, is that Fauci should experience the exact same punishment as he inflicted on those beagles.
No question about it.
I mean, the guy is sick.
Coming in at number nine, you have President Trump who signs an executive order to end federal funding of gain of function research.
It should never have been funded in the first place.
Many people suffered and died because of it, and Fauci lied under oath about it.
Fauci must be held accountable for what he did.
In at number eight, the White House says it has no timeline for releasing the Epstein files.
This is just infuriating.
Known pedophiles are roaming free in our society, and that is simply unacceptable.
In at number seven, you have leftists.
They lose it as President Trump orders the reopening and rebuilding of Alcatraz prison to lock up the dregs of society.
President Trump has vowed to empower the police to do their jobs.
We're going to need more prison space.
Number six, Tom Tillis.
He announces that he opposes Ed Martin, President Trump's nominee, U.S. attorney for D.C., in D.C., due to, get this, J6 concerns.
He is actually willing to let crooked Trump-hating Judge Bozberg make the pick instead.
Well, he just got Janine Pirroed.
If you haven't called Tom Tillis' office yet, please do so.
He's going to get a need to be primaried stat.
And he needs to hear from all of us, as many people as possible about how we feel about his judgment in this particular scenario.
Bozberg?
Really?
You're going to give him more power than he's already taken?
No.
In at number five, you have Pete Hegseth who orders the Pentagon Purge.
He demands 20% cut in woke four-star generals and admirals across the U.S. military.
It used to be a rare honor to be a four-star general or admiral.
Then they began promoting politicians instead of warriors.
And under Biden, DEI was the only priority.
As Secretary Pete Hegseth said, we're done with that.
Number four, convicted human smuggler who owned a vehicle in 2022 traffic stop admits to hiring Kilmar Abrego Garcia for multiple smuggling attempts.
I mean, these were full-blown operations.
Human smuggling operations?
This is the guy that the Democrats want to die on the hill for?
Wow.
No, he was not a Maryland dad looking for a better life.
Garcia is an illegal alien, wife-beating, human-trafficking, gang-banging MS-13 member, and he belongs to El Salvador and Democrats now.
Good riddance.
In at number three, conclave of Catholic cardinals elect first American Pope, Robert Francis Prévost, to become Pope Leo XIV.
Unfortunately, it appears that he is more aligned philosophically with Pope Francis.
Let's hope he focuses his attention and commentary on matters of faith and not politics.
In at number two, President Trump announces Judge Janine Pirro will be appointed interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C.
This was a Trumpian response to the Tom Tillis blocking the nomination of Ed Martin.
Janine Pirro will do a great job and Ed Martin ended up with a powerful job within the Department of Justice.
Be careful what you wish for.
President Trump's Trade Deal00:03:25
And our number one biggest story for the week.
President Trump announces historic US-UK trade deal enabling millions in U.S. exports.
This was the moment of the week for sure.
This deal not only is great for both countries, it is clearly the first of many and immediately ends the argument that President Trump's tariff strategy won't work.
This quietly destroyed many leftist arguments.
Thoroughly enjoyable.
And there you have it, our top news stories for the week.
We're going to head on to our X channel to see what's going on over there.
Lots and lots and lots and lots, of course.
I hope you are all doing well.
I wanted to also give a shout out to my very good friend, Miss Hobbit, over there, who works so hard on these videos for this show every day and every week and truly does amazing work.
She really does.
So I wanted to just give her a shout-out at Moonlight, M-O-O-N-L-I-T-E underscore D T L.
She and Patriot underscore Lioness, who you'll see at the very end.
I'm trying to put things in a whole new outline for Saturdays because I use this on the show.
So I'm trying to get a little bit more organized with my thinking over here.
But we are going to ask you the question of the day.
So I hope you all are ready.
This is a big one because a lot of people, you had the left, all of a sudden push back on this whole idea.
But if you head on over to my site over at julesjoneslive.com on X and you answer the question, actually, it's not just here.
I've posted it all over the place.
So Getter on Truth.
We read a lot of the answers on those two platforms.
And also I'm putting it even in TikTok and other places just so we can kind of round this whole thing out.
But here's our question of the day.
And if you give your answer, hopefully you'll be in the lineup today, a little later on when we start reading your answers.
It's time for today's question of the day.
Do you agree with President Trump's order to end federal funding for PBS and NPR?
Yes or no?
We want to hear from you.
Share your thoughts and you could be featured live this Saturday, May 10th, during a political rendezvous at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern Time on the Jules Jones Live channel on X. See you there.
Okay, so hopefully you've gotten your questions in.
I'm trying to mix it up a little bit so everybody has a chance to answer on this show.
Trying to pick different people and start in different spots and go to different platforms with the answers just to make it fair because it does it is growing.
This question is growing.
Mixed Messages in Texas00:08:58
There's a lot now.
We've got 66 answers already, but make sure you get yours in there.
All right, so we've got libs of TikTok.
This is new.
The DOJ has launched an investigation into Epic City, a Muslim development in Texas for engaging in religious discrimination and attempting to implement Sharia law.
Yes, we knew this was going to be a biggie.
We knew this one was going to come up.
And here it is, of course.
You have got this religious discrimination and Sharia law that has no place in the Lone Star State.
Any violations of federal law must be swiftly prosecuted.
And this is John Cornyn.
Now, the interesting thing is that, as good as all of that sounds, I mean, I love how articulate a lot of our senators and representatives get up there on their soapbox and they tell you what they're going to do.
They put it on X, they just talk about it all day long.
But actions, of course, speak louder than words, because words really depend on who you're aiming them at.
Because it looks like Laura Loomer found this little number.
I mean, the act and the practice of doublespeak.
Well, I mean, do they really believe that we have memories of goldfish?
She puts out this particular number this morning.
She says, GOP Senator John Cornyn thanked a foreign-designated Islamic terrorist organization that is operating in Texas despite his recent claim that Sharia law has no place in Texas.
GOP Senator John Cornyn says Sharia law has no home in Texas.
However, his own actions as a U.S. Senator suggest that he does support Sharia law.
Here's a copy of the letter sent to Islamic Relief on May 2nd, 2022, thanking Islamic Relief for their humanitarian efforts across Texas and our nation.
Cornyn's letter continued: With the help of their partner organizations, Islamic Relief, Islamic Relief USA, has been able to support many of our neighborhoods and refugees who experience health and financial challenges this year.
Islamic Relief likes to present itself as a moderate Islamic charity.
However, many people, including Islamic countries, have accused Islamic Relief of funding and supporting Islamic terrorists in Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.
These claims have even prompted investigations and funding restrictions from multiple governments.
In 2014, the United Arab Emirates, where President Trump will be visiting next week on May 14th, labeled Islamic Relief Worldwide, a terrorist organization.
She goes on to say, I wonder how the UAIAE would feel about a GOP senator thanking an Islamic charity they designated as an Islamic terror organization.
It definitely sends mixed messages since we have a Republican president in the White House.
Why did John Cornyn thank a designated Islamic terrorist group for their work with refugees?
It's alarming given the fact that many Islamic terrorists have crossed into our country via the previously open U.S.-Mexico border in Texas.
How many were aided by Islamic Relief?
So here is what he had to say in his letter that has been published.
Thank you, Laura Loomer.
I want to recognize and thank Islamic Relief USA for their humanitarian efforts across Texas and our nation.
With the help of their partner organizations, Islamic Relief USA has been able to support many of our neighbors and refugees who experienced health and financial challenges this year with his big blue signature.
This is what we're going to change in this country.
We're going to primary those that get up in Washington and just decide that they're going to do things the old way, not what they were voted to do.
You're starting to see it more and more.
And the act of doublespeak is just, it's running rampant in D. Sleaze right now.
A lot of them.
I mean, I love Senator Kennedy like the rest of them.
He's got the best punchlines, but I'm tired of the talk.
Real sick of it.
So here he is.
He's talking about all the things that he's going to do.
Even though he had written that letter, A.G. Bondi notified me that the Justice Department is opening an investigation in response to my request into the proposed Epic City development in North Texas, religious discrimination and Sharia law.
They have no home in Texas.
Any violations of federal law must be swiftly prosecuted.
And I know under POTUS's administration, they will be.
They are certainly hoping to get the Donald Trump, this one is, because his seat is up.
And of course, you've got quite a competitor there that will absolutely take his seat.
And we're looking forward to that one.
But he's over here trying to convince everybody that he's on Team Trump like they all do.
This is exactly how Mitch McConnell was able to stay up there in D. Sleaze.
Same thing with Lindsey Graham Crackers and others.
This is the game that they play.
And Ken Paxton is going to be an incredible replacement.
Cannot wait until he takes this seat, as I'm sure all of you are.
So they can try and they can cry and they can act like they're one thing or another, but in the end, I think most people are tired of the talk.
This one is going to leave you a little, and well, it won't leave you anything.
It'll just ruffle your feathers, but you probably will not be surprised because the more we find out about this administration and the way it has been operating, or it's not really this one, it's from the previous one.
But there's still snakes in DC and especially in the justice system.
Get this: Jim Comey's daughter, all right, you remember Jim Comey, right?
The one that President Trump fired, right?
I mean, he was the FBI director and he lied.
He's crooked as the day is long.
Well, the daughter of fired former FBI director Jim Comey and the prosecutor from the Epstein and Maxwell cases is now on the P. Diddy case.
Yeah, you heard that right.
You heard that right.
She is now the prosecutor on the P. Diddy case.
Looks like another cover-up is brewing.
I don't believe in coincidences.
It's been very carefully orchestrated to make sure that she became the prosecutor in this particular case, just like the Epstein files.
It's absolutely infuriating.
I know you all feel the same.
I mean, that is her number one job is to make sure that there are records that are not released to the public.
Are you all tired of this stuff yet?
I know I am.
I have had about enough of them.
So that's what we have with that group.
Then you've got Piskanki.
All right.
Jen Piskanki, she traded the podium for primetime, but it appears that her ratings didn't make the jump.
Looks like the spotlight isn't as forgiving as the press room.
Apparently, her show is bombing.
I mean, by the day, and not in a good way.
Not on the winning tame way.
MSNBC's newest primetime program sheds 53% of viewers from the key demo in the second episode.
So ex-Biden press secretary struggles to keep advertisers, coveted viewers.
They're just, she's just not getting it done.
I mean, this is a major bomb.
I'm loving it.
You all know that I call her Piskanky, right?
She used to stand up there and just lie with this straight face, and she did it so well.
I mean, it was almost like she was trained by Obama himself, which, of course, she was because, let's face it, she was a holdover from that era.
So, yeah, we're sitting here watching it in real time.
The left is losing.
Now, if only the Republicans would allow it to keep on happening.
I mean, let them fall.
Let them tank.
That's exactly what we want.
But you've got Republicans in for, you know, they just want to save them every opportunity that they can.
Give them an olive branch.
They bring them back in.
Continue to let them remain relevant.
ICE Newark Custody Cases00:03:13
So here you've got a bus of detainees that were entering the security gate of the Delaney Hall Detention Center.
A group of protesters, including two members of U.S. Congress, they stormed the gate and broke into the detention facility.
The allegations by Newark politicians is that Delaney does not have the proper permitting is false.
They were giving out all of this false information trying to cover.
But here are some of the people who are in custody for those that are wondering who they have.
Chinchilla Caballero is in ICE custody pending removal proceedings.
Caballero is a positive match to numerous TECS lookouts and is a known active member of MS-13.
Ramos Marin, he is wanted in Brazil for homicide and has an interpol red notice.
On April 29th, 2025, ERO, Newark, with the assistance of HSI, SAC, Newark, and CBP, Newark, arrested Ramos Marin.
He is in ICE custody without bond.
Another lovely here is the ICE ERO, the Newark Fugitive Operations Unit in New Jersey.
They encountered Savaria Santa Maria, a citizen and national of El Salvador, pursuant to Raven operation and known and verified MS-13 gang affiliation.
Then on May 5th, 2025, you've got ICE Newark, who arrested Adonis Estevez Bello, a 23-year-old citizen of the Dominican Republic.
Estevez has multiple felony convictions for possession of a controlled dangerous substance, drug trafficking, resisting arrest, and possession of a weapon for unlawful purpose.
Estevez has active gang affiliation with street gang.
Dominicans don't play.
He will remain in ICE custody pending a removal hearing.
Then you have this little lovely.
You have on May 5th, 2025, ICE Newark.
They arrested Maximo Nunes, a 58-year-old citizen of the Dominican Republic.
Nunes has a felony arrest for possession of a controlled dangerous substance.
And he obstruct administration of law, Aggravated unlicensed driving, assault with a deadly weapon with the intent to kill, interfering with the custody of children.
He will remain in ICE custody pending a removal hearing.
I mean, this is what the Democrats are up there breaking the law for.
Yeah.
So, of course, what goes with that is the victim card because that is exactly their go-to, right?
So, Democrat rep, you have La Monica McIver, who was caught on a body cam assaulting DHS agents trying to stop a raid on an ICE facility yesterday.
Immigration Rules and Abuse00:09:23
Maybe she should focus less on theatrics and more on following the law.
Just a thought.
But go ahead and lock her up.
I mean, this should be real simple.
I don't know why there would even be a hesitation if you and I did something like that.
Well, hang on.
We have an example of that.
Hello, January 6th.
You remember when January 6ers were just kind of following in?
There was no, they weren't aggressive.
They weren't doing anything.
They were just kind of, they opened up the door.
You saw the lines of people out the door and they're one by one going through the Capitol.
Well, no.
On body cam, you've got this little lovely putting her two cents in.
Watch.
Let me get to a better view of this one.
I'm going to put it on the other screen so it's easier for you.
Hang on a second.
Let me move this on over here so that you get to see her in action.
I wouldn't want you to miss this ever.
So let me get this thing up.
I got you.
This was.
I fought for my future fucking officer.
And you're here for her.
You were out of the top of my life.
I took your life.
He just applied to me.
He's the one who's talking about it.
I ain't found my complaint.
I'm filing a complaint.
You don't can't talk to a congressman like that.
And you're about not to put your hands on me.
You will, guys.
You're going to scream.
You're found out of leave and it's the last.
You know that smoke.
Isn't that nice?
Isn't that great?
And see that little number at the end that she pulls where she says, Hey, you know, I'm a member of Congress.
You can't do this to me.
They truly do believe that they are above the law.
They truly think that they can get away with anything.
And when you start hearing some of the stories that we're going to cover today when we start really spilling the tea, you're not going to believe all the evidence that we have.
I mean, we, the people, have got at our fingertips enough information to lock up every single one of these shady characters.
So again, tired of the talk.
Real, real tired of the talk.
So then we've got big news.
You know, this guy, I am a huge fan of Stephen Miller.
I just think he is absolutely awesome.
You can tell his brain does not shut off ever.
He just runs like a little mouse.
I mean, he's like, I got it.
I got it.
He's always thinking.
He's always doing his research.
And then he makes sure that he educates even the uneducatable.
The left, media, the leftist media.
He makes sure that they know what they're actually talking about.
So we have big news here.
You have White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller.
He is considering suspending the writ of habeas corpus for immigration cases because who needs rogue judges slowing things down?
He's pointing to the Immigration and Nationality Act to back it up.
Hey, the rules are already on the books.
Go ahead and use them.
So you have Rapid Response 47, who says, and here is his statement on the whole thing.
Let me pull this one up for you so you can see it because he speaks so eloquently.
I don't want you to miss what his angles are here.
A lot of people have been chiming in.
It's absolutely brilliant.
This move is a good one.
Well, the Constitution is clear, and that, of course, is the supreme law of the land, that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended in a time of invasion.
So I would say that's an option we're actively looking at.
Look, a lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not.
At the end of the day, Congress passed a body of law known as the Immigration Nationality Act, which stripped Article III courts, that's the judicial branch of jurisdiction over immigration cases.
So Congress actually passed, it's called jurisdiction-stripping legislation.
It passed a number of laws that say that the Article III courts aren't even allowed to be involved in immigration cases.
Many of you probably don't know this.
I'll give you a good example.
Are you familiar with the term temporary protected status or TPS, right?
So by statute, the courts are stripped of jurisdiction from overruling a presidential determination or a secretarial determination on TPS when the Secretary of Homeland Security makes that determination.
So when Secretary Noam terminated TPS for the illegals that Biden flew into the country, when courts stepped in, they were violating explicit language that Congress had enacted, saying they have no jurisdiction.
So it's not just the courts aren't just at war with the executive branch.
The courts are at war, these radical rogue judges, with the legislative branch as well, too.
So all of that will inform the choices the president ultimately makes, yes.
I mean, really.
Hello.
It's already there.
We're just going to use what's on the books.
Real simple stuff, folks.
Not a big deal.
He's great.
He is absolutely great.
And another reason why I think he was selected when we asked our question a couple of weeks back about who your fave was, I know it's hard because there are a lot of really good people in the Trump administration.
I mean, a ton of them.
It's hard.
I mean, every day you kind of go, mmm, you know, it's still the favorite, but Stephen Miller knocked it out of the park.
He was everybody's favorite.
I mean, just like, with an exception of a couple, I mean, he was number one by miles.
And there's a reason for it.
So then we have got Representative Anna Paulina Luna.
All right, looks like she is trying to restore her reputation after the whole, you know, we should be able to stay at home kind of situation that happened a few months ago.
It wasn't a good look, and she knew it.
Well, she wants to make it up to you.
So she is announcing that she is going to introduce the American Privacy Restoration Act to fully repeal the Patriot Act and strip rogue intelligence officers of their extraordinary mass surveillance powers.
This is huge.
Okay, I'm back being a fan.
So since the passage of the USA Patriot Act in the aftermath of 9-11, intelligence agency officials have used their mass surveillance tools to settle personal scores, interfere in elections, and spy on untold numbers of innocent Americans.
The abuse must come to an end, she says, and I completely agree.
You see how they've been spying on every single one of us.
Those powers have been abused time and time again.
So Anna Paulina Luna has proposed to strip the deep state of surveillance tools by repealing the Patriot Act.
And that is what she is up to.
That is a good place to start.
So yes, retire the 2001 law that turned the surveillance into a government's favorite pastime.
This was really, they went way too far.
So we're going to bring privacy back and put an end to the constant peeping from intelligence agencies.
What will they do with their time, I wonder?
I mean, we're more exciting than Netflix to them at this point.
So this is what I voted for.
President Trump announces that after a long night of talks mediated by the United States, he is happy to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire.
Congratulations to both countries on using common sense and great intelligence.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Here you've got the peace, the president of peace, who is just doing a wonderful job, truly, of making sure that this world just doesn't come crashing in on itself.
The deep state has been trying very hard to ruin this country and they got very close.
You all know what a bullet we were able to dodge with Kamala Harris.
The one with, of course, Joe Biden, where they wrapped up the Capitol and installed somebody there who ended up using the auto pin for pretty much everything, except for that he was going to run for office again, pretty much tells you everything you need to know.
So there's a lot of cleanup that needs to be done.
And I'm just glad that President Trump has got a lot of the people up there that he has that know that we need to clean this mess up or we're not going to have a country.
Again, here we are with Patriot Lioness, who always does a wonderful job of giving a shout out on the show.
Thank you for that.
She announces the show every single week.
And she also announces in the litter box with Jules and Cat Turd Monday through Friday.
If you're not watching that show as well, I hope you will.
If you have time during the week, we have a good time.
It's more of a fast, quick wit, breaking news, fastest hour on the net, I'm convinced.
And we have a good time.
So if you want to continue watching some of the things that we cover here on this show, but it's just a little faster, you can join Cat Turd and I Monday through Friday at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern.
Why We Left Flight Frontier00:05:16
Same channel, same time.
It's just news all the time.
Just come in your number one news source over here.
Tons of things going on.
But we're going to get into what's wrong with these people because there is a lot wrong with these people.
I'm still trying to figure it out.
Plenty of wrong.
All right, so you've got airline workers who refuse to let ticket holder check in and pull out their phones to cruelly mock him instead.
We played this yesterday, but you got to see it again.
It's hard to believe that there are actually people out there that are using their positions in a with a company to basically decide whether somebody gets to check in and fly or not.
Well, I'm happy to report that they have they are no longer working there.
But Frontier Airlines severed its relationship with a pair of contractors after a viral exchange with a customer in which the two acted like complete buffoons.
I think that's being very nice.
Thank you.
But the footage filmed by a would-be passenger was posted to social media platform X on Wednesday showing the two workers who taunted the man trying to check in at Frontier Airlines.
This was a complete disgrace.
The guy was like, Hey, look, I paid for the ticket.
What's your problem?
And the worker says, You didn't pay $25 for an agent assist fee.
Hello.
And you thought you were going to get on this flight and you thought you were going to get on your flight and you thought you were going to get on your flight and you thought you were going to get on this flight.
I mean, it was obnoxious.
It was probably one of the most infuriating videos I've ever had to watch.
And so I get to let you watch it too.
So you can be just as me.
Here it is.
The May Day flight you came back.
And you thought we thought, oh, you're going to check me in.
I bet you we won't.
I paid for a ticket.
Yeah, I paid for it.
I thought I was for agent ACC and you checked in three hours later.
Hello.
I just said that I. You're going to get on your flight.
I just said that I would pay the ticket.
And you thought you were going to get on your flight.
I literally paid for a ticket.
I'm here 30 minutes.
I'm here 30 minutes before my flight.
And they're not letting me check in.
And you're not getting on your flight.
It's a policy.
We don't control that.
And you were never up on your flight.
You were about to let me check in.
Oh, wow.
And you decided that you ain't going to let me check in.
Make me check you in.
You literally work for a company that I bought a plane ticket for.
I'm here 30 minutes before the flight.
Can you please leave, sir?
No.
Can you please leave my personal space?
I'm not in your personal space.
This is not your personal space.
This is not your personal space.
You work for a company.
This is not your personal space.
We ain't got to worry about it.
We ain't got to worry about it.
You don't have to worry about it.
You're literally not doing your job for a customer that has paid for a plane ticket to get home.
I'm literally here at Frontier.
I bought a ticket and they are not letting me check in.
For no reason whatsoever.
Well, you said you're never flying the airline again, so we might as well help you out and have you not fly.
You're overflowing.
I've already bought a ticket.
I've literally already bought a ticket, and this is your reaction.
Goodness sakes.
Can you imagine anything more infuriating?
The entitlement is off the charts.
I mean, this is what some people think.
Okay, well, we don't have to answer to anybody.
Well, if that's the case, you don't need to be there because if I ever worked like that, if I ever acted like that in any kind of work environment, I wouldn't last even a second.
I mean, this is just completely unacceptable.
So I'm happy to report that they are and have been relieved of their duties over there.
You won't be experiencing them.
Although there was like this crazy thing that happened a couple of weeks ago where you had a couple of women and it was like two weekends in a row where they just stripped down to nothing and they were running around the airport.
I was going to show it to you, but I was like, no, not on this show.
Maybe on the cat turd show.
But that seemed to be going around.
I don't know what that was about, but I saw a couple of videos that went viral and you had these women that just freaked out and they just dripped down to nothing and said, okay, well, we're just going to cause havoc in the airport.
All right.
What you do on your own time is your business, but hey, when people are trying to fly, come up with something else.
All right.
So we're going to get into, in case you missed it, these are stories from past shows where we're going to give you an up-to-date on.
AFL Lawsuit Against Roberts00:03:35
There's lots of info in these.
Okay, so we've got Stephen Miller again in the news.
I mean, this man is amazing.
America First Legal drops a bombshell lawsuit against Chief Justice John Roberts.
Stephen Miller's America First Legal, AFL, he filed a lawsuit against Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. in his capacity as presiding officer of the Judicial Conference of the United States and Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
Miller's got guts.
The lawsuit accuses the powerful duo of running what AFL describes as an unconstitutional shadow agency and violating federal transparency laws, basically because what they're saying is, oh, we don't have to give you that.
We don't have to hand over any of the information that you're asking us for.
You even have Democrats who are upset about the whole thing.
So for several years, the media and enterprising lawmakers have launched an onslaught to destroy the impartiality of politically neutrality of Article III, the courts, and particularly the Supreme Court.
So Justice Thomas Alito and Kavanaugh have all faced political and physical threats because of politicization and weaponization of the law.
The law fair has been led by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson, relying upon an ideology favorable legacy media to falsely accuse Justices Thomas and Alito of ethical improprieties.
Their aim was simple, to chill the judicial independence of these Supreme Court justices.
Well, according to the explosive complaint, the Judicial Conference and the administrative official of the U.S. courts long presumed exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, FOIA, and have functioned more like an executive agency rather than neutral arms of the judiciary.
So, AFL argues that these entities must comply with FOIA because they exercise executive powers, including responding to congressional oversight and issuing binding regulations, all under the direction of Roberts himself.
AFL's lawsuit stems from FOIA requests for communications between the agencies and White House and Johnson, two of the most vocal Democrat crusaders against conservative judges and justices.
So, after the agencies flatly denied the request, claiming FOIA doesn't apply to them, AFL took them to court.
So, this is a great step in the right direction.
No one is got all of this, you know, people need to be held accountable, and that's the whole thing.
And they do have restrictions and limits.
It doesn't matter if you're a justice of the Supreme Court or not.
But again, you've got this group of people, Roberts, especially, who we've all been suspicious about, I believe, since the very beginning, and especially since his name has been floating in areas of the unknown on islands that we dare not speak of until we get confirmation.
However, hopefully, that confirmation is coming out soon.
Loan Allegations and Foreclosure Risks00:12:38
Because you wonder why they go bad?
Well, it doesn't take much to figure it out when you start looking at some of those lists, if those lists would ever be published.
I don't understand protecting these people ever.
This is a good one because we have covered Letitia James, that's French, Letitia, for a long time on the show.
Actually, we did a whole entire show on Letitia James, and this is when she was really going after President Trump.
Well, a lot of people don't know all of the controversy, they don't know all of the different things that she is being accused of.
Well, when you hear them, you're not going to believe it.
It's more than just, oh, you know, she just had her name attached to her father's as his wife.
Could have happened to anybody situation.
No, there's more than one incident, and we're going to get right into them.
So, the legal risk facing her, you've got, of course, mortgage fraud through misrepresentation of familial relationship.
One of the most striking revelations emerges from a 1983 real estate transaction in which Letitia James and her father, Robert James, obtained a mortgage as husband and wife.
You can say, oh, you know, she really wasn't looking at it, fine print, oh, just couldn't see that day, didn't have her glasses, what have you.
know I mean these issues span mortgage fraud federal loan misrepresentation campaign finance violations and improper coordination with non-profit entities we've got the whole summary here so this was the first little number that dropped and everybody went oh we may have something here and here it is you've got the names you've got Robert James and Letitia James his wife Okay, very, very easy to see.
The foreclosure final accounting.
This is a big one too.
I mean, when you look at first, the loan application and why it happened.
All right, the first one, Cadillac Funding Corporation is listing them as married, despite the fact that Letitia is his doctor.
I mean, his daughter.
Such a misrepresentation of a relationship to qualify for a loan could constitute mortgage fraud under both federal and New York state law.
Under 18 USC, Section 1014, knowingly making false statements to influence a financial institution, well, it carries a heavy penalty of up to 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
New York law also prohibits filing false written statements with intent to defraud under penal law, Section 175.35.
If the misrepresentation were found to be intentional, the consequences could be dire.
Criminal prosecution, disbarment, even removal from office.
But it doesn't stop there.
Number two, undisclosed Virginia foreclosure purchase.
Well, in December of 2008, James's name appeared on the final foreclosure accounting as a purchaser of a single-family home at 21 Peter Street in Martinsville, Virginia, alongside John Z and Philip Finney, her relatives.
So you've got the foreclosure final accounting, and you have John C. P. Finney, Philip M. Finney, and Letitia Ann James.
Here's the foreclosure held on December 16th, 2008.
Notably, her first name was misspelled as Lutitua raising questions about whether James, a New York City Council member, was trying to hide her identity from public searches.
The Finneys have previously owned the property before being foreclosed on by Wells Fargo Bank.
Well, despite her involvement as a buyer, James's name does not appear on the subsequent substitute trustee's deed a few weeks later in January 2009, which lists only the Finneys as the new owners.
So it started this way, and there you go.
There is no record, recorded transaction that indicates that James sold her interest to the Finneys, suggesting potential violations of Virginia property laws and raising concerns about New York State campaign asset disclosures and possible fraud.
Doesn't stop there.
You have the HAMP loan.
This is number three.
The HAMP loan fraud through misrepresentations of property details and income.
So in 2011, James, she successfully disposed of her 10% interest in private bank mortgage rate on her Brooklyn apartment building by refinancing with a federal home affordable modification program, HAMP loan, and received a favorable 2.7 interest rate on the back of guess who?
Us, of course, the American taxpayer.
The documents indicate that James qualified for the loan only by falsely stating her apartment building had only four rental units when the certificate of occupancy actually shows five.
So here's the deal.
And why is that important?
Well, people, this particular person went over there and said, hey, there are five.
There are definitely five units in here.
Confirmed that there are.
Well, she also claimed highly questionable financial hardship to obtain the loan despite an income of around $14,000 a month.
These discrepancies could trigger a legal liability for James under the False Claims Act, which allows the government to impose treble damages and fines for false statements made in order to obtain government funds.
So she knew how the system worked.
I mean, absolutely she knew how it worked.
This chick is bad to the bone.
So additionally, ethical and, of course, implications remain potent, especially for the official whose public persona is built on holding others accountable.
I mean, hey, that is what she was going to do with President Trump, right?
She was going to take every building he had.
She was going to destroy him.
She did that with a smile on her face, right?
Didn't work.
It completely backfired.
And it's really interesting because now she's saying that this is, of course, political and it has nothing to do with being political.
It has to do with being a crook.
And she's a crook.
So no one is above the law, Letitia.
Those are our words to you.
No one.
Well, number four, you have a legal campaign coordination with a nonprofit.
So during her 2013 campaign for New York City public advocate, James paid 501c4 nonprofit New York Communities for change.
This was NYCC.
It included service of like canvassing, campaign workers, staff, rent, phone.
All of this is all here.
She's got it all listed.
Well, it raises serious red flags.
IRS rules strictly limit the ability of a 501 organization to engage in partisan political activity and coordination with a campaign may constitute an illegal in-kind contribution under both, they got it, federal and New York election law.
These allegations mirror the kind of nonprofit abuses James herself later warned against.
So it could result with the IRS and the revocation of the nonprofit's tax-exempt status, campaign finance penalties, and a referral for criminal investigation.
So the hypocrisy undermines James's credibility in enforcing nonprofit laws statewide.
Then you've got number five: documented campaign finance violations.
Leticia's James's campaign for public office have repeatedly run afoul in New York City Campaign Finance Board.
So audits of her 2013 and 2017 campaigns revealed improper contributions, unreported in-kind support, and expenditures not directly related to the campaign activity.
In both cases, she was required to repay taxpayer-provided matching funds and accept financial penalties.
Well, although these are administrative rather than criminal, the pattern raises broader concerns: the compliance of culture within her political operations.
People are starting to look and say, okay, all right, maybe there's one, but there's a lot here.
I mean, whatever she's doing in business, she knows the workarounds and she has been using them illegally.
So, for an elected official tasked with enforcing campaign finance and public integrity laws, repeated violations, no matter how procedural, I mean, it raises questions about selective enforcement and political double standards.
Then you have misrepresentation of her primary residence in Norfolk, Virginia.
All right, could you not?
As detailed in Sam Antar's white-collar fraud website, in August of 2023, you have Letitia James, who co-signed for a mortgage for a property located at 604 Sterling Street in Norfolk, Virginia, alongside her niece, Shamise Thompson Hairston.
Well, as a part of this transaction, James executed a notarized power of attorney on August 17th, 2023, which included a sworn declaration stating, I hereby declare I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.
Well, this declaration is instrumental in securing favorable lower mortgage rates, typically reserved for primary residences.
So this is a very big deal.
William Polt, he is the director of Federal Housing Finance Agency.
He cited this declaration in an April 14th, 2025 letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleging that James may have falsified bank statements and property records to acquire government-backed assistance and loans with more favorable terms.
Polt, he emphasized that primary residence mortgages, they receive lower interest rates and more favorable loan terms compared to secondary residences.
James's HAMP loan was also cited by Pult for the investigation.
Here's the deal.
Letitia James has risen through New York's political ranks, advertising herself as a watchdog for justice, but her own records and her own background shows a pattern of legal and ethical misconduct.
Period.
End of story.
Her mortgage practices to campaign irregularities to misuse of a nonprofit, even the whole documentation of her being considered a slumlord.
Well, if the laws Letitia James enforces in New York are to have any legitimacy, the same scrutiny must be applied to others, and it should also be applied to her.
A failure to hold her accountable for her issues can only erode public trust even more in the office that she holds as in New York State.
They can't have an attorney general who behaves as though she's above the law.
Just like she said President Trump to him, no one was above the law.
Well, neither is she.
This is unreal.
I mean, they've got all of the receipts right here.
So when you talk about Pay Dirt Day on Letitia James after what she did to President Trump and his family, hello.
Comer's Concern About Evidence Destruction00:14:54
I'm here for it.
All right, we're going to start spilling some tea.
This is going to be a great show.
You're going to love all of the different things.
Well, some of them, some of them we get into the abuse of animals.
So I'm going to go ahead and give you a warning right now before I get into some of those stories.
They are very difficult to read, that anybody would be so horrible to animals.
And Dr. Fauci is an evil monster.
I'll see you around the corner.
we go.
Okay.
So we've got a lot to discuss.
And I think this is really why we're all kind of feeling the, all right, well, if you got something, why don't you go ahead and produce whatever it is?
Because we can handle it.
We're ready.
We've been living it.
Let's do this.
You've got enough information by now.
Let's go, kids.
So Representative James Comer, he claims Epstein files may have been destroyed, accuses federal government of a possible cover-up.
I mean, isn't that really what we're all saying at this point?
I mean, what's going on?
Why don't we have those files?
This has been years.
Epstein killed himself.
Or so they want you to believe.
Thank you, Kash Patel.
I almost fell out of my chair when I heard that.
Anywho, besides that, he did a fabulous job, but he always does.
I mean, Cash is very well spoken, very quick-witted, and incredibly good at what he does.
I do have faith that he will be able to clean this up.
But here's the thing: again, once you leave the arena of speaking amongst and with the people, you get into D-Sleaz.
And I know that they are now an agency man now, agency men, and I know they're doing their best to keep this whole thing together.
But the whole thing is so corrupt, it needs to come down and be disbanded and then start all over from scratch again if you must and go somewhere where you can help make that happen because the stories that we're going to talk about and how the government has been involved in each and every single one of these things.
One of the every single one of these scenarios, it's a government.
It's the government.
And I am tired of people protecting the government.
If there is something wrong in an agency that you lead, you need to be the one to expose it.
That's what we have put you in there to do.
We've all watched it.
We've all seen it.
We know people who were involved in it quit with the whole covering up and trying to save the agency men.
I'm sure there are some good ones and I'm sure they can go somewhere else.
But my gosh, I mean, this is horrible.
The fact that we have got a list that the FBI has in their possession and no one has done anything about it, all of these years, these pedophiles have been able to just carry on life as usual.
We've had two deaths, all right?
Neither of which do I believe were suicides.
It's just not something that I'm going to even accept for a second.
And this continues to go.
People are dying as a result of this.
People's lives have been destroyed.
Children's lives have been destroyed.
So Representative James Comer, he claims the Epstein files may have been destroyed.
Imagine that.
Wow.
Kind of like Hillary Clinton's cell phones, right?
He accuses the federal government of a possible cover-up.
This is an interesting one because he really does lay it out.
He had an interview, the House Oversight Chairman, Representative James Comey, he basically called it like he saw it.
He revealed what may have been one of the most damning developments yet in the fight to uncover the truth behind Jeffrey Epstein's sinister global sex trafficking and blackmail network.
The Epstein files may have already been destroyed and the federal government might be complicit.
Oh, really?
Well, he spearheaded numerous high-profile investigations into the Biden family corruption and the weaponization of federal agencies.
And he made it clear.
He believes the Department of Justice no longer has the files if it ever did.
Comer believes the files are already destroyed to cover up the deep state.
And here during his segment, he was talking about all the reasons why.
He said, I don't think the Department of Justice has the Epstein files, or at least the Attorney General does not have them, or she would have turned them over.
The President ordered them released.
The Attorney General ordered them released.
We all know they have not been released.
One of my biggest fears, which I expressed with Kash Patel and a lot of people, including Stephen Miller, going into this administration, was this.
I hope they're not shredding documents right now.
This was a few weeks before the transition.
All right, you all remember we were all kind of making jokes, but we were very serious when we were saying it.
We can hear the shredding machines.
And then there was actually a shredding machine parked right in front of the FBI.
And we're all going, okay, okay, what are we supposed to say about this?
Is anybody going to pull any kind of whistle?
Is anybody going to subpoena anything?
I mean, come on.
All right.
Anywho, that kind of blew on bias like everything else does with all this news that's being dropped on the regular.
So he said, I hope they're not shredding documents, but you all need to go on that first day and try to get all this stuff released because my fear, based on what I've dealt with in investigations and in communications with this deep state apparatus, is that they're probably in there shredding documents as we speak.
So hopefully someone has a copy of that.
Well, the task force on the declassification of federal secrets led by Representative Ana Paulina Luna has been relentless in its pursuit of transparency.
But Comer revealed that Luna is pretty frustrated by the stonewalling as well.
And I hope we find out because our task force led by Anna Paulina Luna, you've had her on your show.
And we haven't spoken to her, but this was the conversation he was having with this particular podcaster.
He says has done everything.
I mean, she's been relentless.
She's been persistent.
She's been pretty frustrated right now that these files have not been released, even though the president and the attorney general have ordered them released.
But it's like I told Anna, the same thing.
I told Patel and everything else.
You assume that someone in the deep state said, okay, we'll just put these in a file back here, this incriminating evidence on everybody, and maybe the next administration can do whatever they want with them.
Well, that's not, that's the way it's supposed to work, but unfortunately, that's not the way it has worked, especially with this deep state and especially with all of the names that are on that list.
Comer's gravest concern is the potential involvement of the federal government in Epstein's operations.
All right.
That right there should let you know exactly.
A lot of people have said, hey, you know, Epstein was an informant for the IC.
This is what he was doing.
He was getting dirt.
He was working for them.
Well, he was also breaking the law.
He was hurting children.
So, you know, we need to put all of that aside now that he's gone.
If he's gone, some people still think he's out there living, breathing, living this best life.
I don't know.
All I know is there's a lot of stories that are circling around about why those security guards fell asleep and all of that stuff.
Were they drugged?
I mean, the cameras being off.
Hello.
I mean, come on.
Who are you kidding?
Comer has said, and the congressman suggested that the deep state actions may not be driven by loyalty to figures like the Clinton, but rather a desire to protect their own power and avoid disruption.
So you've got incriminating evidence that could most likely have been destroyed because they want to continue to hold on to power and they want to operate business as usual.
And this stuff could put them all in prison.
So James Comer came back and he said they should.
That's what they're supposed to do.
But you and I have dealt with them.
You've covered the deep state.
They cover their tracks and it's hard for me to believe they're going to leave incriminating evidence.
If the government was involved, if the government wasn't involved, I don't think they would have any reason to protect Bill Clinton or Hillary.
However, or anybody else, I mean, he doesn't think they would have any reason to protect Bill Gates, right?
Or Prince Andrew.
But the thing about it is, is, was the government involved?
And if so, to what extent did the government know?
Was the government using Epstein and the videos to blackmail the most influential people around the world?
I say yay.
I don't even have to hesitate on that one.
If that's the case, then they knew there were victims of sex crimes there, and they did nothing.
That's the concern.
If the government covers this up, I don't believe it's because of any love affair or any affiliation with the people that were involved.
It's because they were involved.
They didn't want their agencies to be disrupted.
The same thing with the Epstein files.
He says, I don't know this, but my concern is that the government may have known a lot more and may have been an active participant, maybe with the intentions of intelligence gathering.
Who knows?
But at the end of the day, I don't think the American people would be okay if the government knew that crimes against young women and everybody, who knows what else, were being committed, and yet they did nothing to intervene.
I don't either.
And this was a conversation he had on Benny's show, just so everybody knows.
But of course, that's what makes sense.
That's what makes the most sense is that they were absolutely involved.
Not only involved, but engaged.
And that even makes it sicker.
And that puts it on a totally different level.
Well, as soon as he said that, woo-hoo!
Okay, so the antenna picks up with Pam Bondi.
I mean, she's like, oh my gosh, what's going on over there?
And she responds to James Comer because here she is saying, you know, hey, I'm going to give him a call.
This is after the stunning allegation from House Oversight Chairman, Representative James Comer, regarding the Epstein files.
So she was hit a whole bunch of times this week, both with an undercover video and everything else.
I mean, we learned all kinds of things from Pam Bondi because everybody's been waiting and all of a sudden Project Verit, well, not Project Veritas, sorry, OMG started releasing all of these different videos, accusing them of saying, hey, you know what?
You're talking to total strangers.
We've got you on video.
And you're disclosing that you know that Prince Andrew and all of these other people were harming children.
I mean, this is the first time that they've actually come out and said something about it.
So Comer, he spearheaded this whole thing by bringing up the subject and doing it on a podcast.
And she had to defend herself.
I mean, she said, whoa, you know, the FBI, they're reviewing tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.
And there are hundreds of victims, she said, while scoffing.
And no one victim will ever get released, she added.
It's just the volume.
And that's what they're going through right now.
The FBI is diligently going through that.
Then Bondi said she would be in touch with Comer.
I haven't seen that statement, but I'll call him later and find out, she said.
Listen.
James Palmer said yesterday that all the Epstein files are missing.
Can you confirm that?
We still have them from you.
No, no, the FBI.
Yeah, the FBI, they're reviewing.
There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.
And there are hundreds of victims.
And no one victim will ever get released.
It's just the volume.
And that's what they're going through right now.
The FBI is diligently going through that.
I haven't seen that statement, but I'll call him later and find out.
So she was kind of caught on her heels this week, big time, because then at the exact same time, you have, of course, James O'Keefe Media Group, who released an explosive undercover video exposing Prince Andrew's sexual relations with minors and ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
I mean, hello, it doesn't get any dirtier than this.
And this is the scoop.
This guy, again, if you want to talk to these people, they are more than happy to sing about how important they are, how they raised Fergie's children.
I mean, this is who you're talking to, the man of the hour, the man with all of it.
Give me a break, but they do a great job.
I'm telling you what, they get people, these journalists are incredibly seasoned and amazing at what they do.
So, of course, you've got this revelation that was caught on Hidden Camera by OMG.
The American businessman and longtime royal insider John Bryan, he came forward with the damning claim about Prince Andrew's personal relationship.
If you have not seen that, definitely hit up his page.
He's got it all up there.
Now, these are things that we were a little disappointed because we thought, okay, we're going to have something really great, something we don't know.
Covertly Recorded Revelation00:13:01
But this was the same thing that we've known.
However, it definitely has now been brought to everybody's attention that there are videotapes and that the FBI is reviewing massive a number of them.
But again, where are their arrests?
You don't have to sit there and write everybody's name down.
As soon as you get a name, go get him.
Go get the pedo, right?
I mean, what are you waiting for?
You can protect the victim.
I don't want to see the video.
Nobody wants to see the video, but we want the pedo off the street.
So can you do two things at one time?
I would think so.
I mean, with as big of an agency as it is, with as many people that are there, I mean, get them to work in the field.
Arrest, please.
So Brian, a trusted advisor to the Duke of York, also alleged that Prince Andrew lied to him about his involvement in sexual misconduct with minors.
I knew Prince Andrew, and I knew that he saw Jeffrey Epstein, said Brian, but he lied to me.
He was such a good friend.
He was, you know, he said that he was even called in to talk to him.
This was after the 2019 BBC interview where he denied knowing Virginia Juffray and famously claimed he was physically incapable of sweating.
Brian says he was quietly brought into the Royal Lodge.
This is Andrew's private residence to provide crisis management advice.
In a previous interview with the New York Post, he revealed that they, the British royal family, brought me in to help him, Andrew.
Yeah.
So he went on and on and on.
I mean, he wasn't able to focus for more.
He said that Andrew was so distressed, he couldn't focus for more than 40 minutes.
He was all shook up over the whole thing.
According to previous reporting by the Daily Mail, Brian also admitted the crafting of a five-page PR strategy titled The House of Croy, advising Andrew to publicly express sympathy for victims of Jeffrey Epstein while maintaining his own innocence.
At the same time, Brian publicly supported the print, stating, I believe Prince Andrew is innocent.
He said, I did a big thing in the Daily Mail saying that I believed Andrew, Brian recounted with the undercover agent.
And the journalist added, and then I found out, and then I found out he was lying.
I was so mad.
When he asked what Andrew had lied about, Brian didn't mince words.
He says that he was doing underage girls.
That's not cool.
Now, I replaced one of the explicit words in there, but yes, that's exactly what he was doing.
So you've got, of course, Prince Andrew's close tie with Jeffrey Epstein.
This whole thing reeks.
And so now that it's in Pam Bondi's corner, this is what she's experiencing right now.
And do I feel bad for her?
No, not at all.
She's had this stuff.
She teased us with binders with nothing in them, no new information.
She used the influencers on X. If you all do not think that you have a voice, I have news for you because they go to you first.
They feel like if they can convince you, that you can convince the world.
Well, not when you've got things on tape.
Here you've got Pam Bondi, who was covertly recorded, revealing previously undisclosed information about Epstein.
And that is the reason we found out why she had to make that public statement in reference to what Comer was suggesting is because she knew this stuff was already out.
So this was the second part of the O'Keeffe media group and this whole series that he did.
So this undercover video of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed previously undisclosed information about Jeffrey Epstein.
So in an April 28 recording, this is April 28th when this whole thing went down.
So she was, and her office had been contacted to say, hey, look, we got the goods on you.
You want to comment on it?
And she did not comment on it, but she knew she had to get ahead of it because she knew as soon as, of course, the theatrical James O'Keefe was going to start talking about it, she needed to find her moment where she could slip that little number in to kind of numb everybody and say, oh, no, we've got this.
No, you should know this.
Well, no, you never told us about videos before.
So here you have this video.
These are tens of thousands of little kids that are being abused.
All right.
And she revealed to a stranger in a DC restaurant that this was going on, that the FBI was combing through them.
Do you know when the Epstein files are going to be released?
A concerned citizen asked Pam Bondi.
We hope soon.
When pressed for more information, Bondi added, No, you know what it is?
There are tens of thousands of videos, and it's all with little kids.
That's where they, the Department of Justice, have been working.
People don't understand that's what they've been working and going through, Bondi said.
Well, they contacted Pam Bondi on May 1st to request comment about the covertly recorded footage.
And a week later on May 7th, you had Pam Bondi who echoed her private message to the public for the first time.
There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.
There are hundreds of victims and no one victim will ever get released.
Okay, here's the deal.
Do you really think that those videos just have Epstein in it?
I mean, do they really think that we're just going to buy?
That's the only name that they're going to say they have in this video is Epstein, the dead guy?
I mean, you're still blaming the dead guy?
Huh?
Hello.
I don't get these people.
I really do not.
I mean, they think that we're just going to be like, okay, well, we've now had that conversation.
Move along.
No, we're not going to move along.
There are kids that are being abused, even right this very minute by these same pedophiles.
They do not, they do not just clean up their act and pack up and go home and everything's fine again.
They continue to abuse little kids.
Lock them up.
Give them the treatment that they deserve.
My gosh, it just makes me even sicker.
It really does.
I mean, granted, I'm glad we now have, we have the knowledge that there are videotapes, but get these guys off the street.
And who else?
I mean, I'm not just saying just guys.
I'm sure there are girls too.
So he asked her on May 1st to comment on the covertly recorded footage.
A week later, as you saw, she came out swinging with statements.
So why was the information held back in the first place?
Does this show that the government apparatus is still working behind the scenes to protect powerful people involved in the scandal?
Of course.
Of course.
That's exactly what they're doing.
And you know what else?
To take it a couple of steps further, they are protecting themselves.
Government agencies that were part of this whole thing, they all knew it was going on way back when, over there in Florida, and they were a part of the whole deal this entire time.
And there are names that people are going to recognize, but the government was definitely in on it.
I have no question about that in my mind.
I don't know how you feel, but that's how I see it.
Then, of course, you've got Tulsi Gabbard, who reveals the real reason why Anthony Fauci sought a preemptive pardon from Joe Biden.
Wicked doctor could now face federal perjury charges.
But just real quick, I just want to re-emphasize something about the whole Epstein thing before I actually move on.
This is a live show, so it's not like I can edit anything.
But it shouldn't surprise you, based on what we just talked about, that we have got the daughter, right?
The daughter, James Comey's daughter, who is the prosecutor in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, now is the prosecutor on the P. Diddy case.
I'm sorry, but hello, there are no coincidences.
So, after being on SDNY's prosecution teams against Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice, Madame Maxwell, Jim Comey's daughter is now on the DOJ's team against P. Diddy.
I mean, seriously, you've got the deep state everywhere.
Where in the world is Pam Bondi?
You're going to have the exact same prosecutor?
Are you James Comey?
When he was around when all of this stuff was going on, do you really expect for us to just accept this?
No way.
So you've got this whole article here.
Before President Trump stepped into the White House, there was an attempted coup d'etat to have him removed from office.
It began with claims that a candidate and then President Trump was a Russian puppet using false stories fed to the corrupt U.S. media.
James Comey, Jim Comey, whatever he goes by these days, was a big part of the effort to remove President Trump from office.
He could not be trusted and he was fired.
He was fired by President Trump.
Despite his questionable actions, Comey walks free today, making six figures speaking fees.
All right, so he's torn around, living his best life, making tons of dough, while sharing his hatred for President Trump.
Trump lives in his head permanently.
But as Americans know, Comey's daughter is a chip off of her father's block.
No kidding.
She works for the DOJ in New York.
Maureen Comey, an assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, SDNY, is one of the lead prosecutors in the criminal case against Maxwell and had been picked to hold a similar role in the case of the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein prior to his death in August of 2019.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Comey heads the SDNY's Violent and Organized Crime Unit and has been with the office since 2015, according to her LinkedIn profile.
The 32-year-old Harvard Law School graduate has been involved in a number of high-profile cases, including against former gynecologist Robert Hayden, who was accused of sexually assaulting as many as 70 women during medical appointments.
Now it's being reported that fired former FBI head Jim Comey's daughter is now part of the prosecutorial team in the P. Diddy case.
Surprise.
So, this was reported by the Daily Mail, and you have all these things that are happening as a result.
Maureen Ryan, Ryan Comey, a lead prosecutor in the sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, and the accomplice, Madame Maxwell, has joined the prosecutor's team and in the ongoing case against Sean Diddy Combs.
Comey, who also happens to be the daughter, right?
Okay, so here you've got her that she filed a notice at the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York on Monday, December 2nd, and the document obtained by Billboard notes the attorney will be joining the legal team in the case.
And surprise, the Diddy case is falling apart.
Now, there's also another one that was dropped.
You've got a key witness, a key Diddy witness who mysteriously goes missing right before the trial starts.
She was set to deliver very personal and explosive details next week about the abuse she experienced at the hands of Diddy.
Oh my gosh, all of the employees of the DOJ in New York should be fired and replacements hired from across the country.
NIH's Dog Experiment Controversy00:15:16
Could not agree more.
Could not agree more.
So this is what, this is what we are up against.
This is it.
This is the cover-up.
These are the people that come in to cover this stuff up.
So I had to just, I know I mentioned it earlier in the show, but I just had to re-emphasize it and read you this piece because you need to know how many snakes in the grass we actually have.
The Epstein Diddy, there are, and again, they're one of the same.
And they are going to the shelf and they are getting the can and they are doing exactly what they did with Epstein because they were allowed to get away with it.
And they are going to continue to do it.
They think that the world will not spin on its axis without people like this running it.
And I mean, we're talking big figures.
That's what I think.
All right.
More to more shameful matters.
As I was saying, you have Tulsi Gabbard, who reveals the reason Anthony Fauci sought a preemptive pardon from Joe Biden.
Wicked doctor could now face federal perjury charges.
You got to get the man on something.
I mean, you absolutely do.
You got to get him.
This guy is as evil as evil can be.
He is Dr. Evil.
The worst of the worst.
So DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, she dropped a bombshell during an interview this week with Megan Kelly and former NIH director Anthony Fauci.
Should be concerned because, despite his auto-pen pardon, there's a number of ways that we can get this guy.
So, she talked about a variety of issues.
I really like Tulsi.
I really like Tulsi.
She is following through.
She really wants to get her job done.
She wants to prove that she can do it and she can do it masterfully.
She also leaked, there were leaks from the administration on whether she would run for president or not, and she did not rule it out, just FYI.
The really great thing here is that we've got a whole bunch of people that have left the left and have come center to right that are wanting to make this a better place.
And the more, the better.
She didn't rule that out.
She also discussed the origins of C-19 pandemic.
And then, when the issue regarding C-19 came up, Gabbard had plenty of interesting news to share.
So, she told Kelly that she, along with others, were investigating whether the United States funded gain of function research, which caused the COVID-19 pandemic.
This would mean the U.S. tax dollar, again, courtesy of us, hello.
You had our taxpayer that taxpayer dollars that Fauci fueled the worst health crisis in over 100 years.
Here's a quote from her.
She says, the thing we are working with Jay Bhattacharo, the NIH director on, as well as Secretary Robert Kennedy, is looking at the gain of function research.
That in this case of the Wuhan lab, as well as many others, she said that many of these biolabs from around the world were actually ding-ding-ding U.S. funded and led to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.
So, if it were Peter Dasek's research with the Wuhan bat lady that caused this pandemic, then did we fund it?
Did Anthony Fauci fund it?
So, Gabbard then revealed this was exactly why Fauci sought a pardon from Joe Biden, who of course granted it, especially since he was previously caught under oath lying to Senator Rand Paul, Republican Kentucky, about his role in the C-19 pandemic.
The thing about that he denied over and over to Senator Rand Paul's questioning under oath, Gabbard responded, is it any wonder why he sought a preemptive pardon for anything during a certain period of time from Resident Biden before he left office?
The exchange was incredible.
I'll never forget when he and Senator Paul were sparring, and Senator Paul knew exactly what he was doing.
So she knows exactly what's going on here.
I'm going to play what she has to say so that you can see it for yourself, because we know exactly what's happened with this group.
I mean, we've got some of the worst of the worst, but Tulsi is a good one.
I mean, she really is fantastic.
So here she's going to go after him in any way that she possibly can.
Reversed.
So a lot of what's been found is already there.
But the thing that we are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on with, as well as Secretary Kennedy, is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan lab,
as well as many of these other bio labs around the world, was actually U.S. funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.
Let me ask you specifically, because we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to create, to do gain of function research.
We just have never been able to have somebody say, and it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug.
But have we gotten there?
What's the new thing that you're digging in on?
We are working on that with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to being able to share that, hopefully very soon.
That specific link correct between the gain of function research and what we saw with COVID-19.
I mean, that would be extraordinary because just so the audience knows, if that's true, if it was Peter Dazik's research with the Wuhan, so-called bat lady that caused this pandemic, then we did fund it, then Anthony Fauci helped fund the pandemic.
Things that he denied over and over and over to Senator Rand Paul's questioning.
That's right.
Under oath.
Under oath, exactly.
So is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon for anything during a certain period of time by President Biden before he left office?
And then strong-armed and smeared people like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, anybody who came out and said, I don't know if that's natural.
This actually smacks of lab.
And the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in the past.
It's because this gain of function research is happening in biolabs around the world.
I got attacked, and I think you saw this, we've probably talked about it on your show before, when I warned against U.S.-funded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason.
Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and, if released, could create another COVID-like pandemic.
And for that, I was called a Russian asset.
You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points, all of this nonsense, simply for speaking the truth and stating facts that, by the way, are still on U.S. Embassy Ukraine's website today.
That's exactly right.
And that's how they operate, and that's how they work.
I mean, when you start talking about Anthony Fauci, let me just tell you, there's only one word that I can use to describe this person, and he is a monster.
So Trump, thank goodness, Trump's NIH shuts down the final beagle lab, conducting painful experiments, ending the Fauci era cruelty and bureaucratic waste.
This was awful.
What they did to these beagles, and I'm not going to read you every word because you know what?
You probably know a whole bunch of it, but my gosh, I mean, the whole thing with Bhattachara, he confirmed the closure of NIH's last in-house beagle lab.
For 40 years, NIH-induced sepsis and hemorrhage, had fever in dogs.
They sourced the beagles valued for being docile from a contractor that was paid the largest animal welfare fine in history.
I mean, millions and millions of dollars is what this guy is going to owe the courts as a result of all of this.
So the fact that we have gotten rid of all of the beagle experiments on NIH campuses, thanks to President Trump, it's a start.
There's so many others.
But I mean, when you start finding out what all has been going on, Dr. Fauci's experiments with beagles in Tunisia, you have the White Coat Waste Project, which is a taxpayer watchdog group.
It provided examples of Dr. Anthony Fauci facilitating cruel and unnecessary tax-funded experimentation on dogs, Tunisia.
The grants he shipped part of a $375,800 grant to a lab in Tunisia to infest beagles with parasites.
This is one of the most horrible articles I've ever read.
And that's why I'm not going to read all of it to you because it's just bad.
But I am going to put it into the chat so that you all have it and you can read it.
But my gosh, I mean, the grant money funded a study published in 2021 that detailed the horror that was inflicted on these dogs.
I mean, one of the tortures was that the beagles were subjected to.
They include locking their heads in mesh cages filled with infected sand fleas so that parasite carrying insects could eat them alive.
I mean, beagles are also used for these tests because of their gentle nature.
That nearly broke my heart right there.
I mean, even when people want to harm them, they're just gentle dogs.
And so that's why they were selected.
This is enough to just ruin your day.
I mean, here was another thing here.
They locked when they had these dogs that were sedated.
First off, the place that they were kept was just ill-equipped.
It was horrible.
I mean, not even portable water, nothing.
I mean, just in the worst of the worst conditions.
Well, the experiments locking beagles alone in cages in the middle of the desert, isolated for nine consecutive nights to use as bait to attract more infectious sand fleas.
I mean, sand flies.
There's a photo of it.
They have a photo of where they would just leave them out in the desert, isolated for nine consecutive nights to attract more of these sandflies.
This is so sick, and they were using our money to do it with.
This is what it was.
The White Coat Waste Project, they used the Freedom of Information Act.
They revealed that Fauci spent $424,000 to commission another study in which healthy beagles were given an experimental drug and intentionally infested with flies that carry a disease-causing parasite that affect humans.
The researchers are developing infections in 28 beagles and allowing them to suffer for three months before being euthanized.
They also report that records show that the dogs were vocalizing in pain during the experiments, and so they removed their vocal cords.
The organization also noted that the experimenters admit this particular drug, it has been extensively tested and confirmed in different animal models, such as mice, Mongolian gerbils, and different ones, meaning that this painful torture is completely unnecessary.
It's already been done.
In a letter sent to Fauci in 2021, Congressman Scott Perry and 14 colleagues cited their investigation and demanded answers about the project, including how much money had been spent to date, how many dogs have been killed, and why the NIH commissioned the deadly dog testing when the Food and Drug Administration said it's not required.
I mean, this is sick.
They were using tax dollars to buy beagle puppies and strapping capsules full of infected flies to their bare skin.
Unbelievable.
I mean, the dogs were discovered crammed into feces-laden cages, drinking non-pottable water and eating rotten food.
This company where they were getting these dogs is called In Vigo.
They were slapped with a record $35.5 million settlement.
This is according to the Daily Caller.
On April 29th, NIH announced a sweeping initiative to move away from animal testing and toward a more effective humane methods.
You think this is just about as bad as it gets.
And even though this was a big win, think about how many, how many dogs perished.
So the White Coat Waste Project, and they're very happy to report that after a nine-year campaign, Whitecoat Waste has shut down the NIH's last in-house dog lab.
2,133 beagles perished here in cruel septic shock experiments until we exposed it and closed it.
Last month, NIH defended the test and confirmed that they were still active.
So they're celebrating all of this.
There's also one for cats as well.
And so they're working on making sure that one's shut down too.
This whole thing, just stop the madness, please.
I mean, they're using these poor little animals to conduct all of this stuff.
And so President Trump has taken action.
He banned federal funding for dangerous gain of function research.
They're Delaying00:15:00
President Trump Monday afternoon signed the executive order in high-risk countries like China and Iran, as well as nations with insufficient research oversight.
When you find out there wasn't even anybody looking in or over on some of these things, it'll make you even sicker.
So the order equips the U.S. research agencies to identify and terminate funding for biological research, both ongoing and future, that could threaten public safety or national security.
It specifically targets federally funded studies abroad that risk triggering another pandemic focused on gain of function experiments like those conducted on bat coronavirus by the EcoHealth Alliance and China's Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The measures also seek to shield Americans from lab accidents and biosecurity incidents and those believed to have contributed to the C-19 pandemic and the 1977 Russian flu.
It is a big deal and President Trump was very happy to sign it.
And of course, you had Secretary Kennedy, who told the story of how America came to gain of function research in Wuhan.
In all the history of gain of function research, we cannot point to a single good thing that has come out of it.
So goodbye.
We no longer need this.
And everyone is congratulating each other, of course, because it is a big deal when you think about the fact that Dr. Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, they funded $3.7 million grant through EcoHealth with nearly $600,000 sent to WIV for bat coronavirus studies.
And a lot of Republicans, you know, were talking about this.
This was one of the things that everybody, I can't imagine, the Democrats probably are going to go against it with their record of things these days.
But yes, many Republicans were slamming the dangers of this gain of function experiments and how it could have absolutely sparked these pandemics.
We know it did.
We absolutely know it did.
Hello.
So, of course, you had in the final days, Joe Biden who issued a preemptive pardon of Fauci, shielding him from potential prosecution over allegations he misled Congress about the research.
Well, as you know, Tulsi is answering that call.
There is also the scathing house report reveals that FBI butchered the probe of a 2017 shooting of Republicans at a baseball game.
Hello.
Why so many botched reports, FBI?
I mean, what's going on over there?
Exactly.
As you recall, in the spring of 2017, just months after Trump was sworn in for his first term, a crazed gunman targeted the congressional Republicans at a baseball game, seriously injured House whip Steve Scalise, among others, before being taken down by Capitol Police, who were only there because Scalise's position required a security detail.
Okay, let me read that to you again.
They were there to protect him, and he was the one that got hurt the worst.
All right, and he's still suffering as a result of it.
So the shooter's name was James Hodgkinson.
He was described as a Bernie Sanders campaign volunteer and a Rachel Madcow super fan, which explains why the story just completely disappeared from the lamestream media.
Well, a new report from the House reveals that the FBI completely butchered their probe of the shooting, downplaying the shooter's anti-Republican motives.
The entire incident from the moment it happened was mishandled and completely misreported.
So, of course, they've got the whole thing here.
They've got the report.
You can read about it.
They downplayed the anti-GOP motives despite having handwritten evidence.
This is what the report found.
I mean, you've got, they combed through roughly 3,000 case file documents.
It was given last month on the attack that wounded six, including, of course, the House Majority Leader Steve Scalise.
The gunman is gone, so can't go there for any answers, of course.
They always seem to just, man, I don't know.
Amazing.
Guy on the roof, all that stuff.
Manifestos in schools.
I mean, all of a sudden, they're just nowhere to be found.
Epstein, I mean, hey, now Virginia Jufre did just amazing with this government.
I mean, don't go near them.
We won't be breathing.
None of us.
It's dangerous, is what they are.
Scary and completely out of control.
So, four years later in 2021, you had the FBI abruptly changed its determination without new evidence, according to Tuesday's report, to conclude that Hodgkinson's attack was actually motivated by domestic violent extremism.
Hello, this just goes to show you how badly we needed new leadership.
So, imagine if a shooter had been a conservative activist, is the example that's being given.
I mean, Sean Hannity, super fan who tried to kill Democrats.
The media would have covered the story non-stop for years as proof of Republican extremism.
So, now it's on the books for what it is.
Thank you to President Trump.
But here we go: Attorney Ty Clevenger.
This is a big story.
Still waiting for facts, still waiting for information.
It's still under investigation.
Hello.
So, that should tell you everything you need to know.
That's their workaround.
Oh, we're still investigating.
Oh, we're still watching perves on sex films, okay, with little kids.
Sorry, we're busy right now.
Okay, that's not going to last for very long.
Sorry.
So, attorney Ty Clevenger blasts the FBI, weak excuses in the Seth Rich case.
He demands Congress to haul the FBI into hearings.
Patel and Bondi have allowed the FBI to continue its pattern of delay, and it is true.
They are delaying, delaying, delaying.
So, this goes with the Seth Rich case, and he has unleashed a scathing rebuke of FBI stonewalling, accusing the Bureau of peddling incredibly weak excuses to hide thousands of critical documents that could blow the lid off the Russia collusion hoax and the mysterious 2016 murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
Of course, them following the same pattern is they've been doing it for years.
They've denied even processing Seth Rich's lap or even possessing his laptops, right?
I mean, they said, Oh, we don't have it, and then all of a sudden they have it when they were forced to disclose that.
They had it all along, yet the agency still refused to disclose any metadata from Seth Rich's electronic devices, and that's why Clevenger filed a motion in federal court to hold the FBI in contempt for what he calls deliberate and willful defiance of a court order mandating the release of key information related to the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
So, he fires off a blistering letter basically torching the Bureau for what he said was calculated in an ongoing effort to conceal critical records about this case and to bury the truth about the discredited Russia narrative.
He took on to X and said the FBI filed a response to our contempt motion in the Seth Rich case, and it raises more questions than it answers.
The response offers some incredibly weak excuses for thousands of missing documents, and it contradicts some of the earlier admissions by the FBI.
So, the interesting thing is they laid bare that the FBI's possession of critical evidence, including his work laptop, a personal laptop image, a DVD, and a tape drive, items the Bureau they initially denied having.
And even though they had court orders to review the devices, the FBI stonewalled, offering flimsy justifications for withholding thousands of documents.
Clevenger argues that it is a calculated effort to protect the discredited narrative that the Russian hackers, not rich, leaked the DNC emails to WikiLeaks in 2016.
So this isn't going to go well for them.
They're claiming that the public really isn't interested in this case.
That's what they're actually saying.
They're saying that you're not interested, and so there is no reason for them to be interested or to disclose anything.
I mean, as far as they're concerned, they're just going to place it under still under investigation until they hear from all of us.
I guess we have to make noise in order to get attention to this matter because that's what they're hiding behind.
They're also saying that, hey, there are some corrupt files on these computers, and we don't feel like we need to bring them back to life.
Like, we're just going to let it go.
That many of the files were too corrupted to be opened.
And they suggest that the agency has no obligation to restore or reconstruct the records.
That's their response.
I mean, this is how they've handled this whole thing.
They're not even thinking about releasing this information unless they are forced.
So you've got all of this stuff, and it's making people mad.
I mean, it's only making people more upset.
The fact that they wrote in their own response, the laptop and records found here on, they belong to an individual, a homicide victim that happened to land in the government's possession.
The defendant has no obligation to restore a computer to its original condition when it did not receive the personal laptop in its original condition.
The files were corrupted at the time the government first attempted to review them.
So what plaintiff is requesting is essentially that the defendant create new records that it never possessed uncorrupted files from a homicide victim's personal computer, but this exceeds the government's obligations under the FOIA.
Please.
And he also, they also, the Bureau's accusation that Huddleston has lack of standing to pursue the content claim pointing to a prior filing indicating he transferred his interest in the case.
And so, yeah, and they just don't think that you're interested in getting to the bottom of it.
They just think, we're just going to file this under, let's just continue to collect dust.
We're investigating, but it's really not at the top of our priority list.
Amazing.
I mean, you have got thousands of documents.
And in the effort to protect the discredited narrative that Russian hackers, not rich, leaked the DNC emails to WikiLeaks in 2016.
People are, this is why I'm telling you.
It doesn't take much to figure out why everybody is upset.
I mean, rightfully so.
If we're not able to get the goods or get the information, hello.
Then there's this little number.
FBI responds to Yehuda Miller.
And you've got the FOIA request on Ray Epps, and it only raises more questions.
Seeking information, please.
Hello.
You've got Ray Epps everywhere, and no one's talking about it, really.
I mean, you have Ray Epps, who was listed as number 16 on the FBI's most wanted list for the first few days after January 6, 2021 protest, until he was removed from the list.
Well, according to Kash Patel, when he spoke to a podcaster about this particular oddity, I mean, like, why would this even happen?
He says, you know, I mean, hey, you know, there's two pieces of information that Ray Epps was on the FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day he was off the most wanted list, right?
There are only two scenarios in which that actually happens.
You either die or you're an informant, okay?
Yeah.
There are two ways that you get off of being on the FBI most wanted list.
You're either goners, you know.
And he's still with us.
And here's the podcast where he actually said it.
I think as a former federal prosecutor and a public defender who defended a lot of these types of cases, what you let me, let me, let me move it on to my bigger screen so that you can see it better.
I have to remember to do that.
I'm now like shuffling all of these screens, trying to make this a more pleasurable viewing experience for each and every one of you, because that's what we do here.
That's what we're attempting anyway.
All right, here we go.
I think as a former federal prosecutor and a public defender who defended a lot of these types of cases, what you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6th.
Because if you can show that, you know they've been at, hang on, but the paperwork shows having run informants, that's a six-month buildup.
Minimum.
Right.
Minimum.
It's not like they just dropped them into the Proud Boys and said, hey, go, don't disrupt, please.
Once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation.
Forget what the videotape shows.
Just for people who can't see what's going on in the room, the reason why Cash just said, hang on, or whatever, is because I started smirking and rolling my eyes.
And what I meant to convey with that is, come on, we know they were involved.
Government Infiltration Suspected00:08:40
Well, no, no.
No, look, I totally clarify, though.
I'm not saying I know definitively.
What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents.
There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building.
All right.
You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen.
I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt.
Two pieces of information.
Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day he was off of the FBI's most wanted list.
There are only two ways that happens.
You die or your informant.
Put that aside.
Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division, in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when Senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6th?
And she said, quote, Senator, I can't answer that at this time.
Not, if the answer was definitively no, having been a DOJ FBI guy myself, she would have gone there and said, nope, absolutely not.
The reason she said, I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russia Gate with Christopher Steele Halper and everybody else.
It's the same narrative, and I'm telling you they were there.
So you're saying that she said, I can't answer that because the answer is yes.
And that would compromise whatever their operation was.
Exactly.
Okay, so, all right.
Here's the thing.
All right.
Again, the government was involved.
Okay.
So you guys starting to follow along?
Are we starting to understand there's a pattern here?
The government is involved.
And so we don't go anywhere near it.
The government partook.
We don't go anywhere near it.
The government was part of the plan from the very beginning, probably orchestrated it.
And I would have to take it a little step further.
Like, there are only two ways that that happens.
You die or you're an informant, or you're an informant and you are a risk.
And so you die in Epstein's case and in others' cases.
So I think that's why we still have those still breathing amongst us.
That's all I can come up with.
But the thing about it is, is the government, the government involvement here is off the charts.
They're our problem.
They are the issue.
They're the ones that are plotting and planning and doing all of this stuff.
They have had free reign.
And I have just listed every single case in which this whole thing applies.
I mean, from Beagles and using your taxpayer dollars in order to do that to Epstein to Ray Epps to Seth Rich.
I mean, it goes on and on and on to, of course, the shooting, the butchered probe of 2017 Republicans at a baseball game.
I mean, name me a situation where the government was not involved.
I'm having a hard time here, really.
I mean, all things point to Rome.
All roads lead to the FBI and to the government, the IC community.
And that's what we're dealing with here.
But the left is losing it.
Why?
Because we have a president that already knows all of this stuff.
He's very aware about how they operate, and he's hoping that he's put the right people in charge to make sure that we turn this ship around.
And he knows that we're going to need a lot of space in this country.
We are.
We're going to need a lot of supermax prisons.
Okay, so if these judges are going to attempt to get in our way, which they are, but it's not going to work because I think we have found a very good angle here.
Stephen Miller, he's done a fabulous job with trying to figure some of this stuff and using habeas corpus and using laws that are already on the books.
We were infiltrated.
We were absolutely, our country was completely infiltrated.
And when you start looking at the fact that they are going to suspend habeas corpus on immigration matters as the courts are raging war, and hey, it's an avenue and it's definitely one worth pursuing.
And so they're all working on this stuff.
They want you to be happy with the job that they're doing and they know you're watching closely.
They also know that this is our last chance because we're not going to have a good chance at midterms if they don't get it right.
I'm sorry.
We just won't.
Those are the facts, Jack.
Good or bad, ugly, and everything in between.
So the leftists lost it when President Trump orders the reopening and the rebuilding of Alcatraz prison to lock up the dregs of society.
Why not?
Right?
I mean, that's what it was built for anyway.
So it was one of the world's most iconic prisons.
It's about to be reopened for business again, and the left is losing their minds, of course.
President Trump announced late Sunday night that he was ordering the Bureau of Prisons and the other federal agencies to reopen and expand Alcatraz prison, which shut down over six decades ago in order to send away dregs of society.
Boy, we have plenty of those.
Thank you, Biden.
Really?
You just let them all in.
You did not care because you wanted an invasion.
That's absolutely what you wanted.
Not only did you want an invasion, you wanted to completely destroy this country and you wanted a revolution here.
That's exactly what the plan was.
President Trump is stopping that before it started, and he is doing his absolute best.
Plus, when you think about it, rebuilding and opening Alcatraz, which it closed in 1963 because it was supposedly too expensive.
Well, with the money they've been throwing out all over, your money, my money, they've been throwing all over the world to abuse beagles and everything else.
You know what?
Let's pull it in, folks, and let's work on getting these prisons set up.
We're going to need a lot.
I mean, not just, we can't just stop at Alcatraz.
Today, it hosts over 1.2 million visitors a year as a major tourist attraction.
And Trump said it was just an idea.
He said that the radical judges coddling illegal aliens are playing a key part in the decision.
He also said it's a symbol of law and order.
And it has got a lot of history, quite frankly.
So he thinks that we're going to do that.
And they're looking at it right now.
President Trump loves symbolism.
He loves to use it as an example of things, and this is one for the books.
Well, Nancy Piglosi wasn't very happy with that.
No, she says, Alcatraz closed as a federal penitentiary more than 60 years ago.
It is now a very popular national park and major tourist attraction.
The president's proposal is not a serious one.
Except, Ms. Piglosi, let me remind you as a California resident that you have completely destroyed tourism in California.
Okay, especially in San Francisco, and which you are supposedly represent.
Let me explain something to you.
Conferences will not go there any longer.
They want nothing to do with San Francisco because of the homeless situation, because of the drug situation, because you have run it into the ground.
So please don't come here with it's a tourist attraction because nobody wants to come to California.
You are seeing people moving out of California in droves, huge numbers.
You don't see people moving in.
You can take a U-Haul, for example, because a friend of mine just moved out of the state, very dear friend, has decided, hey, you know what?
I'm done.
And so she's leaving.
And so she got a U-Haul and she was getting prices.
And they said, oh, yeah, you know, you're really lucky that you are taking that U-Haul out of this state to go where you're going.
Because if you were to bring this U-Haul back, it's going to cost you like three or four times as much.
Why?
Because they need that.
Nobody's coming back.
No one's coming back into California.
So it costs more because then they have to figure out.
The whole thing is just so upside down.
But it's because of Nancy Piglosi.
It's because of Gavin Newsome.
It's because my state is completely controlled by Democrats.
Voter ID Controversy00:07:36
100%.
It is really, really something.
This whole thing.
And you've got all of these people that are freaking out over this decision, which is glorious in and of itself.
I'm loving what the Trump administration is doing.
I'm loving, and I should start with President Trump because, my gosh, if anybody can save this country, it's him.
And he has already started.
When you start talking about filling the 46 judicial vacancies, here they are.
He launches his first wave of nominees to restore rule of law.
He knows where the problems are.
And so he kicked off his next historic reshaping of the federal judiciary, announcing the first wave of a six powerhouse judicial nomination to fill the current 46 lifetime vacancies on the bench.
So during his first term, President Trump transformed the judiciary with 245 federal appointments, including three Supreme Court justices, and now he's on track to do it again.
According to the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts, there are currently six vacancies in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 40 vacancies in the U.S. district courts, 15 more vacancies pending as judges have announced their retirement.
And you've got all of these different judges that he has named and that he wants for all of these different positions.
And he's thrilled to announce them.
He's been announcing them on his page this entire time.
Good, good stuff.
And he's learned a lot of lessons along the way.
So he's doing his homework.
All right, everyone.
So that is why we did this particular segment.
We wanted to kind of shine a light on why America wants accountability.
And that's why we named the show what we did today.
So we have finished spilling the tea there.
We are moving right on to our dish segment because that's an always fun one.
And we'll just keep on moving right along with this show.
But it truly is something that needs to happen.
Not only will we lose midterms if we don't get it together and if we don't start seeing results.
I'm tired of emails.
I'm tired of posts.
I'm tired of people getting on Fox News and going, oh, we're doing so, so much.
We need to see it.
We need people to be held accountable for their actions.
We've lived it.
We can handle it.
We need to see it for ourselves.
You can't sugarcoat this stuff.
You can't hide behind agencies.
You can't do that and expect for us to trust you.
We know too much.
We've lived it.
We've been a part of it.
When you think of what we all experienced in the election before we got President Trump in here and we had Dodo Bird up there and they wrapped the Capitol in barbed wire so they could install and they could carry on and have an autopen run our country and the Obama administration at the helm.
They can do anything.
And when I start talking about the stories that we just covered, my gosh, what do you have all over the place but the government's mitts?
I'm not going to cover for the government.
I'm going to report the wins and I'm going to report the losses.
And I know that I've probably upset people because they're saying, hey, hang on.
You've got to give them time.
I'm sorry.
Grace period is over.
I'm not here to make friends.
I'm not.
I've got my friends.
I've got you all, but I've got to see results because when I do go and have these conversations with my friends, they're sitting there tapping their nice little nails saying, Okay, where is it?
There's no there there to what you have been talking about.
And you've got the best people up there appointed, or at least the ones that you had the most faith in.
We need to see it.
We don't want to hear it.
Thanks.
All right.
So we're going to head right on in to the Daily Dish.
I just love Juanita Broderick.
I think she's awesome.
I truly do.
I think she's just probably got one of the greatest accounts in on X.
I almost called it Twitter.
Oh my gosh, I'm aging myself again.
My gosh.
All right.
So she put out this little number.
Okay, you're never going to guess it, but massive illegal voter fraud was being uncovered.
It's the tip of the iceberg.
Oh, yeah.
All right.
So Big Fish, another fabulous account that I follow as well.
Good, great account over there as just awesome, great content.
Big Fish 2000 says the game is over.
Thousands of illegals registered to vote and voted in just a couple of states.
This is just the tip.
Okay.
All right.
So all of you that were talking about election interference and election fraud, you were right.
Here he is.
And then you just note saying, hey, guys, let's just look at the public voter rolls who we find in some friendly states.
And we looked at the voter rolls and we found that thousands of them registered to vote in a handful of states.
And then we went any further with those friendly states and found that many of those people had actually voted.
It was shocking to us.
If I hadn't seen it with my own eyes, I wouldn't have believed it.
And so now the question we're asking ourselves is: what do we do?
We refer to some of the prosecution that's ongoing right now.
You know, we're thinking through how to do it.
And the reality is they have various kinds of status, and it's a very detailed analysis legally that we're going through right now about how to deal with it.
So thousands of those people registered to vote in the election.
Which is a federal design, by the way.
Well, yeah.
I mean, the interesting thing is, like, the Heritage Foundation has a very good project.
You know, it's obviously right-leaning, where they're studying all cases of fraud.
I looked at it before we're here.
There's only been 24 cases since 2003 of somebody who's a non-citizen trying to vote.
Now, those are people caught.
So, this would be incredibly dramatic if it was even a thousand people.
Oh, no, Jason, it's more than a thousand.
I've seen it.
I've seen the data myself, and it's more than a thousand in just a couple of states.
I mean, it is shockingly bad.
And this is the tip of the iceberg, guys.
It's the tip of the iceberg.
Oh, all right.
So, a lot of people lost their accounts whenever they were talking about what was going on in our elections, right?
I mean, there were a lot of people that had their lives turned completely upside down as a result.
And that's why I'm really happy about this whole new information about Anna Paulina Luna, who is also going to make sure that the government can't just sit there and spy on people so that you don't just get a knock on the door from the FBI because you're in a Facebook group, right?
Because you're discussing something as ridiculous as making sure that we're cleaning up our elections or voter ID or something like that.
Something really, really sinister.
So that's why I'm happy about that.
The American Privacy Restoration Act that we talked about a little bit earlier, she's introduced this to fully repeal the Patriot Act and to strip rogue intelligence officers of their extraordinary mass surveillance powers.
And that's what she's been working on.
Okay, so now it is time for yours and my favorite, which is when you are the stars of this show, which you are.
Why We Don't Waste Time00:14:40
You've been on the screen this entire time.
I've got you up for everybody to see all of your comments.
But it's our question of the day, and we're going to find out what you have to say.
Here we go.
It's time for today's question of the day.
Do you agree with President Trump's order to end federal funding for PBS and NPR?
Yes or no?
We want to hear from you.
Share your thoughts, and you could be featured live this Saturday, May 10th, during a political rendezvous at 3 o'clock p.m. Eastern Time on the Jules Jones Live channel on X. See you there.
And here you are, like a genie out of a bottle.
All right, so let's see what you had to say.
Like I said, I'm putting this everywhere, so I'm trying to get like all kinds of comments, and I will start from the bottom over here on X first.
But let me get these up here because I think it's pretty, pretty straightforward.
Mark Kennelly.
Oh my gosh, you know what I noticed?
I don't have the spam accounts on here anymore.
At least they're not marked.
I don't know if there was something that happened on X. Remember, we used to have those.
And I would open them up and read them.
And they seem to be Patriots to me.
Of course, I was considered a spam account too at one point when, of course, the leftist commies were running X.
So I always try to give those people some recognition because I know exactly what that's like.
But we've got Mark Kennelly at Mark Kennelly23 who says, yes, they are nothing but a tool for Democrat Party.
Absolutely.
If they want to keep broadcasting, this is Rennie Stack at our Stack29.
The shows should be financially viable without taxpayer handouts.
Like any other business, if it is a product people want, you will have success.
If it's a bad product, you go out of business.
Hello, huh, Renny?
You're speaking my language.
We've got Monica Coin, who, let me spell it, at Monica, C-O-Y-N-E 58, who says yes.
And then, of course, we have Steve Wilson.
Yes.
This was a total cover-up.
Why should taxpayers subsidize a biased media?
This is just one example.
And this is at the account at WILS-TV.
Why haven't you seen any stories from NPR about New York Post Hunter Biden story?
Read more in this week's newsletter.
Here it is.
We don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories.
And we don't want to waste the listeners and readers' times on stories that are just pure distractions.
Okay, this came from Samuel, Terrence Samuel, NPR's Managing Director for News on the New York Post Hunter Biden story.
Now, that tells me everything I need to know because, as you all know, they were all instructed.
It only took years for us to figure this one out.
It only took years for us to get the goods on that story, that it was all part of trying to make sure that there was no interference in getting Joe Biden elected.
So here it is.
I blew it up and I put it on this other one so that you can see it.
This is why.
This is their statement.
This is from the NPR public editor.
They don't want to waste our, they say, in here, they actually put a meme together, all right?
And has have this broadcasted on social media.
Why haven't you seen any stories from NPR about New York Post Hunter Biden story?
We don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don't want to waste the listeners and readers' time on stories that are just pure distractions.
Now, hello.
If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know, I don't know what will.
I really don't.
Good job, WILTV, W-I-L-S-T-V.
Okie Tiki at Okie Market says yes.
Monkey Girl48, yes.
Ron Blasco at Ron Blasco says yes.
We have Fleet Admiral James at Mighty Mouse200 who says yes times 100.
PK941 at PKTENN.
First off, big hello to PK941.
PK10 has always watched both shows and has been such a huge supporter.
I just wanted to say hi.
I appreciate everything that you do.
You are just so full of life and I just love what you put out there.
So, PK, thank you for being such a good friend.
Truly, I see it all.
I really do.
When I can, when I'm over there, and you are just an absolute standout.
So, I'm glad I ran across you today.
Then we have Jolene, Jolene, yes, at Jolene M-A-H-S-T, who says, both PBS and NPR are propaganda pushing leftists.
Not one more penny should be given to these lunatics.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
You remember, I mean, here they are: ABC, Fox, Snoops, you have MSNBC, Facebook.
Oh, yeah, they all say the exact same thing.
We've got actual video.
Whenever they get the memo, you can always tell because it's like a fishbowl.
They're all saying the exact same thing in the exact same way.
It's really scary.
And that's what they are.
I mean, they're sheep.
Tulit Gaming at T Smith042069 says, Absolutely, both have been one-sided Democrat propaganda machines for years.
I don't agree with my hard-earned money going towards that.
I think you're absolutely right.
I mean, the things that we're finding out our money has been going to is appalling.
MAGA Blonde at JWKM 1989.
She says, FFFFM.
Yeah.
You'll have to read between lines on that one.
All right.
And then we have author, author W-I-E-N-C-E-K-1, who says 100% yes.
We have at CAT 0892554.
A check mark there.
We have at DBOPPER5, yes.
We have DGRI07076.
Yes.
We have Robert Vail at Robert V60149759.
Yes.
With a cute little kitty cat.
Maurice Four at Missy Row 3259482862.
Let me do that again.
At Missy RO325-94862.
You all are supposed to be following these people, by the way.
If not, you can follow my page and you can go down the whole list and you can start pulling them.
Yes, she says they can use advertising as their means of income like other stations.
PBS can allot the time they use begging for their viewing public for support to advertisers.
Not sure if NPR does that.
I pay no attention to them.
Most people don't.
Lisa Sykes at Lisa S YK 1860-5457.
Yes.
Lisa M02184.
Yes, yes, yes.
We have TLB Maguire who says yes.
Jay Davis says yes.
Not one more penny of our tax dollars should be given to them.
We have at S19434S with a green red check.
We have CASC 1776.
Yes.
And in their federal funding, they raise enough money through their fundraising drives.
Then we have Rocco Howitt one.
And that's R-O-C-C-O-H-O-W-A-T one.
100%.
100%.
And so on.
There should never be a need for state-funded media.
In the UK and Australia, taxpayer-funded stations are left-wing propaganda machines.
And you, my friend, you always show up in my morning feed because I believe you're in Australia and you are so inspiring.
Thank you for responding to my little morning post.
Just nice to see.
I love the morning post.
I have so much fun doing them because I feel like if we start the day off from the right foot, that things are going to be different today.
I know.
I'm trying.
Anyway, we've got CK57 at CLK657.
Yes, long underdo.
All right, I don't even have to say yes anymore because all of them are, but I'm going to give you shout outs anyway at TammyNorth239 at Becca H67123979.
You have SL underscore G-R-I-B who says, I used to love watching cooking and traveling shows on my local channel.
However, the content became polluted by LGB and propaganda and anti-Christian rhetoric to the point I just stopped watching anything.
A shame as our local station produced excellent series about the region.
Joe Just Joe, sick and tired, Joe 2 says, yes, yes, I do.
L, never dim now.
Never dim now.
Maybe you were at him?
Is that what you're saying?
Okay.
She says yes, though.
At never dim now.
And then we have BJ Cole M775702.
Wait.
BJ C O L M 77570727.
I know.
Of course, PBS and NPR ceased.
Impartial coverage of events long ago.
Billy32318, yes.
You have Tammy Davis68, yes.
You have at JJRSVL, who always puts out an awesome promotion on this show, and I appreciate you more than you know.
Absolutely to defund these propaganda entities.
This is a republic that should be capitalistic and so on and so on.
Now, I'm going to move on over because I have a few others here on Getter.
You know, I missed Getter last week and I felt so bad about that.
I, you know, sometimes that these things happen and I just get caught up in the moment and I miss things.
I'm just going to make sure if I have anybody that said anything on Getter, that I grab them because it's important to make sure that everybody's included.
And this one is from at Cat C A T R 66 U E.
And I also have, I skipped a few, but I'm going to go on over to Truth because I asked the same question over there.
And I got a crew over in Truth that I have got to make sure that I say hello to at the One Rose.
You are such an inspiration.
Let me just say that right now.
Just always giving out a message and a shout out to the show.
Thank you for that.
I truly see it.
I truly appreciate you.
Thank you.
So we've got, let me see, some of these answers in here.
Let me go see what I got.
The funny thing about Truth is it's harder to pick up the answers because we actually repost it a whole bunch of times.
And so I have to, let me go see.
I know there were a couple of them in here and they may not have ended up on the second one, but I got one.
Let's see.
All right, we have real Aunt Susie who says, How do we stop this trash thinking with our kids?
Our daughter is on her fourth pothead.
Not at my house.
She's 48.
Yeah, I think by 48, it would be pretty much time to, you know, let her do what she's supposed to be doing out there.
I know I wasn't allowed to hang around.
My parents were like, okay, so what are you doing?
And how long is that going to take?
And you got to go and start.
I always had multiple jobs and multiple things going on at one time.
It just I was not allowed to hang around.
And no, no boyfriends at the house, I can promise you.
And especially if they were potheads.
Nope.
My parents were always, always questioning what was going on.
And I was read the riot more times than you can imagine.
So on YouTube, we had a few too.
Let's go see what's going on over there.
Let me pull this whole thing up.
That's the problem with the live show.
Whenever I start all this stuff, I have to get into it first.
And you're going to see yourselves probably on the screen.
Let me just put this in here.
All right, let's get to you.
All right, hang on a second.
Just bear with me.
I'm trying to be inclusive here.
All right, so here we are.
Okay, here you are.
And then our question of the day.
And we've got some comments.
We have Mitch R. 1963 who says yes.
We have got Jen Essett Broman who says yes, defund it now.
We have Caroline Food Forest 355.
Thank you for all of your comments, by the way, Caroline.
I noticed it too.
Thank you so much.
Yes, defund it, she says.
We have Sapphire Cat 2000 who says yes, especially NPR.
We have Rob V 4936.
Yes, absolutely.
We have got, let me see here.
Let me pull this over here.
I forget that that's the screen you cannot see.
Lemon Twist Revealed00:05:35
See, I'm getting used to this like you are.
It's going to take a while.
All right, then we have got, all right, then we have Joanne Mayner, 7586, 100% yes.
We have David Nugent, 6815, yes.
We have Marbly Mount, who says yes.
We have Kat M. Hill, yes.
Dave.68, 100%.
C-A-T-C, 1238 says yes.
Ronnie J. Wade, 12, yes.
And we have Littles is Greentree 6901 who says yes.
All right, thanks for everybody for participating in all of this.
This has been so much fun trying to figure out the ways of the world.
The ways and the ways not of the world.
What a deal.
All right.
So interesting.
I've had to learn so many new things now that we're on our own doing our own thing.
And it's like, really?
I mean, you have a memory muscle in your brain where you get used to using things.
And then all of a sudden you get really good at your craft.
And then all of a sudden something changes and then poof, you lose everything.
You have to start all over again.
And you go back to like having to go through the whole learning curve again.
And did I do this right curve?
And then I'm going to stay up and I'm going to make sure I do it twice curve.
And then you start getting it.
But it's going to take a little bit of time.
Thanks for being so patient with me.
I really appreciate it.
All right.
So I want to thank each and every one of you for being here today.
You all are just awesome.
I appreciate you more than you can possibly imagine.
I would not have this show without you.
I absolutely want to take a minute, though, to thank my team.
Just incredible, incredible support.
A huge shout-out and round of applause to the incredible team that works tirelessly behind the scenes.
Endless gratitude to the brilliant Patriot Penzi for crafting insightful articles, conducting meticulous research, and to the storytelling virtuoso Rob Plegram Sr.
I don't know how he puts together the top 10 and gets it in 10, but he does.
And the beautiful monologue that he creates every single week.
A special thanks to Fleet Admiral James, whose contributions enrich every single aspect of what we do, and to Megavolt007 for the invaluable ideas and countless efforts that help drive us forward.
Finally, a standing ovation to our amazing mods who foster a safe, welcoming space where we can all connect and share and spill the tea.
It's just so much fun to get to know each and everyone.
We're grateful for everything that you do.
Thank you for creating this amazing environment for us to do it.
This stream, it showcases music from Bobby Troop featuring the track Lemon Twist alongside additional selections by Julie London.
These timeless melodies have been generously shared by my very good friends, Nick Twit and Lank London, and our heartfelt thanks for their contributions for the complete playlist.
If you'd like to see it, you can check out the video description below.
They're all listed there.
But those are my friends.
They're my Hollywood hideaways.
Like me, being a conservative in Hollywood can be brutal sometimes.
And they are my friends here that like me keep it on the down low.
But I appreciate everything that they do.
So this week's tea, it has been spilled and served.
Thank you all so much for watching and following.
Your support means the absolute world to me.
And I wouldn't be here again if it wasn't for you.
I'd be doing something else.
If you haven't already, hit that follow button.
It's free.
It makes a huge difference.
So do all of your comments in chat.
I love reading them.
Please stay engaged.
But in the meantime, you all be safe.
You be kind to one another.
And we will see you later.
Toodly do.
Slices of Persuasion00:00:46
Even the skeptic replies that here's a suggestion you can't resist a cool drink with ice is improved with some slices of lemon twist.
It isn't merely circumstantial evidence that the lemon is a highly healthful citrus fruit.
The most respected scientists agree with the physiologists that here's one fact you can't dispute.
Why don't you open your eyes?
Your psychosomatic ills won't persist If quick like a rabbit, you latch to the habit of lemon twist.