April 26, 2022 - In the Litter Box - Jewels and Catturd
01:00:54
Prayers for Catturd - In the Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd 4/26/2022 - Ep. 70
|
Time
Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hello, hello.
Today is Tuesday, April 26, 2022, episode number 70.
You're in the litter box with Jules Jones, cat turd, my feline in crime, is still in the hospital.
So you're stuck with me again today.
But I know he's hungry, so I'm assuming that's a really good sign.
I asked him if there's anything that anyone could do for him because he is hearing your prayers.
He's completely blown away by it.
I don't know if you've looked on his Twitter page, but he truly is overwhelmed by the response, as am I. He really has no idea the kind of impact that he's had on so many people.
And so today I named the show Prayers for Cat Turd.
If you can continue on in that quest, just we need him well.
We need him back in fighting.
I know he's just sick over the fact that he had to miss all of the news, at least on this show.
He would have loved to have talked about the whole Elon Musk and the Twitter takeover.
This is, of course, the morning after.
And there have been meltdowns like you've never seen before.
But just make sure that you keep him in your prayers.
And then also just continue to encourage him.
Those words mean so much to him.
And he's just really excited about getting back into the groove because this has been rough.
And I will say that I saw him celebrating over there.
and this was one of the videos that he retweeted.
So he's still going. - No, they're not going to keep a good cat down, that is for sure.
But there have just been so many different layers of support for him, and all of it is very much appreciated.
In fact, there are a couple of them that I just want to highlight because they were just so sweet, and he retweeted them as well.
Stevie Sacks over there, Stacks over there, and it's at StevieStacks84.
He says, one of my closest friends is CatTurd2.
We talk at least one to two times a week.
He is one of the strongest people I know.
He will come out stronger than ever, but continue to pray for a man who has taught me a lot.
and others as well also makes us laugh our asses off I love you cat turd and it's just sweet I mean just the outpour has been amazing you also have blue star over here that said doctors these days are awesome maybe in the near future you'll know the true amount of followers you have must be two or three million at least get well get well soon and And that's from at bluestar underscore USA. And then,
of course, Magajim, who did the logo for us and the show.
And Magajim at Magajim1 said, we all love you back, cat turd with a heart.
Hope you're feeling better soon.
And there he is in his box.
Hopefully he's resting.
Hopefully that's not how he truly feels.
I know they do have him on some medication, and I know he's weak, but I'm hoping that we're going to get our feisty cat back.
I know you all feel the exact same way.
But we have got a lot of news here that we are going to cover.
Like I said, it is the morning after, and the meltdowns have been just hysterical.
I mean, you really cannot make this up.
So this particular article is the good, bad, ugly, and ignorant reactions to Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter.
Well, he really did it.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk made an above-market offer for Twitter, and after much talk of using poison pills to avoid handing the reins over to South African billionaire, Twitter's board of directors reached an agreement with Musk on Monday and It was the darkest day on earth since net neutrality repeal.
Okay, so yes it was.
The amount of the response was incredible.
All of a sudden everybody's planning on leaving Twitter and all of these different things were going on and they were talking about it.
It's so interesting the way in a second the left can just flip on a dime.
Some of the things that they were saying before when we were all getting kicked off of the social media platform was that it's a private company.
You can't do anything with a private company.
Goodbye!
Or start your own social media platform, which of course President Trump has done as well as others.
So we've been really just trying to tread and stay above water to make sure that our voices are still continuing to be heard.
And thank goodness for those that have put together these other alternatives, because we would have been in complete darkness without it.
Understand how big this is.
So CBS' Nora O'Donnell fretted behind an anchor's desk that hands-off approach might make Twitter a haven for disinformation and hate speech before going on to claim that Musk has used the platform to bully critics and bully reporters who have written about him or his companies.
O'Donnell provided no examples to support her characterization.
All right, so check this out.
And some critics are concerned that Musk's pursuit of free speech will collide with growing safety problems on Twitter, especially for women and minorities.
Do you trust Elon Musk to make Twitter better for women?
At all.
I just absolutely don't.
If you're asking yourself if this is someone that's going to go to bat for people that are underrepresented, I just don't think that's going to be the case, unfortunately.
Okay, so this is a woman's perspective.
Well, their idea of what a woman's perspective is, of course, that is not mine.
My voice has been silenced the day that they kicked off the President of the United States while he was still President off of Twitter.
Me and several other conservatives lost our accounts as well.
So very well versed about how we have not been protected, our voices or anything else.
Believe me, if you could have taken a look at the DMs that I received in a daytime from all kinds of real perverts out there, you would not have believed the stuff that they allowed to fly.
So I don't even want to hear it from these people now.
Sorry, not going to happen.
Here you go.
So that was just one.
And then you have Kevin Tober, who says CBS's Nora O'Donnell also threw a tantrum over Elon Musk supporting free speech on Twitter.
Others are concerned a hands-off approach to content will make Twitter a haven for disinformation and hate speech.
So she goes on and on and on rattling those drums.
And here's the deal.
If you get something on a social media platform that you don't like, I mean, of course you can report it if you feel like that's necessary.
But even better, there's something called a block button.
Use it.
And use it often.
If you don't like it, then get rid of it.
It's not a big deal.
It's up to you.
But to censor speech in its entirety because you disagree with a person and where others cannot participate in that conversation, that's what was happening with the cesspool.
And that is why Like him or not, Elon Musk taking over Twitter is a great thing, in my opinion.
And he's starting to show that by reinstating accounts like Fox News, the Babylon Bee.
Guess what?
Those were just recently taken off the platform.
He's already reinstated them.
So these are good, positive signs that I think is going to help us in the future.
So get this, Brian Stelter, formerly of CNN Plus that went a bust, wondered aloud if Musk's takeover might result in a mass exodus from the platform.
And this is what he said, and I thought this was just amazing.
He says, if you get invited to something where there are no rules, where there is no total freedom for everybody, do you actually want to go to that party or are you going to decide to stay home?
Okay, first off, Creepy, I wouldn't go to a stelter party.
I can assure you of that.
That's an example of a broader question for Twitter, which is, if you get invited to something where there are no rules, where there is total freedom for everybody, do you actually want to go to that party?
Or are you going to decide to stay home?
Okay, so he's not the one that should be asking that.
In my opinion, I'm thinking, okay, kind of creepy guy.
No, I wouldn't go where you go.
But that little clip that was done, that meme clip, was Apocataz, who is on Twitter, and so give him a follow, if you will.
There were a lot of memes that our side did, the conservative side, and they were absolutely fantastic.
It's like...
You know, we're able to express ourselves again.
We feel very comfortable in doing so.
This is really, really good stuff.
So they have been able to use their creativity to ensure that our voices are heard even louder, possibly, than they have been, because we've had to be so careful.
So then you have the Los Angeles Times, My Area of the World.
Columnist Erica Smith urged readers to consider this the beginning of the end of Black Twitter.
Quoting unattributed tweets and a single associate professor at Northeastern University to explain the declaration.
Okay, so they're in full-blown panic mode.
Remember, that's their MO. They love to divide us.
Any way they possibly can.
Now you've heard the female approach.
Now you're hearing Black Lives Matter.
Now you're hearing a party-type situation.
And then you have the whole idea that they're going to take over with the voice.
Okay, it gets better.
All right.
So, at the New York Times editorial board member, Greg Bensinger calls must Twitter a scary place.
Female Twitter users in particular ought to worry about whether Mr.
Musk will bring his apparent disdain for women to the company he is about to own, writes Benzinger, who cites a joke made by Musk last fall as evidence.
Benzinger also warns readers that Musk's goal of turning Twitter into an inclusive arena for free speech will also mean free speech for people like Mr.
Musk, a billionaire and the world's richest man.
Oh, the horror.
Elsewhere at the Times, you had Gera Hardas, who submits that the state-enforced guardrails on social media companies would preserve freedom for those who deserved it, while Musk's vision would free Nazis to Nazi.
Okay, so now we've gotten into Nazis all of a sudden.
When I say that there was a meltdown happening over there at Twitter, I don't think I could have even described it until I started reading this stuff.
I mean, this is really for the ages.
But I think it's wonderful.
Like I said, just watching it is so entertaining.
So then similarly, purported human rights watchdogs, including the ACLU, that of Skokie March defending fame, all expressed varying degrees of concern over the news.
ACLU executive director Anthony Romero made a vague reference to the real life impacts in discourse.
While a representative at Human Rights Watch explained that freedom of expression is not an absolute right.
See the backtracking here?
Incredibly, Ari Melber of MSNBC found himself panicking on air that Musk could secretly ban one party's candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else.
And the rest of us might not even find out about it until after the election.
Okay, that one in particular got my attention.
you all know how involved Facebook was in the 2020 election.
And even prior to that, in the 2016 election, they meddled and continued to meddle.
So it was quite the hypothetical for a progressive to represent, to present in a world where Donald Trump has been banned from the platform and since confirmed story linking Hunter Biden to laptop, making reference to Joe Biden's involvement in his business dealings, was suppressed in the weeks making reference to Joe Biden's involvement in his business dealings, was suppressed in the Oh, yes.
So this is just really interesting stuff.
I find it—no one should be surprised at how they are concerned and what they are doing as far as worried because we've got midterms now.
And all of a sudden, we have a platform that is being opened back up to conservatives, some of the finest voices out there of conservatives.
So the left thought they had this whole thing in the back.
Well, they don't.
Check out this clip.
You own all of Twitter or Facebook or what have you.
You don't have to explain yourself.
You don't even have to be transparent.
You could secretly ban one party's candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else.
And the rest of us might not even find out about it till after the election.
Yeah, exactly.
Exactly.
That would be us.
That's already happened to us and they are the first ones that accuse us of something they are guilty of.
We've seen it time and time again.
All right, so unsurprisingly, the Biden administration has expressed its own concerns.
White House Press Secretary Jen Paskanky, as I call her, but Jen Psaki, declined to comment explicitly on the purchase, instead opting for the not-so-veiled reminder that we've long talked about and the president, or we call him the resident, Has long talked about his concerns about the power of social media platforms, including Twitter and others, to spread misinformation, disinformation, the need for these platforms to be held accountable.
So Reuters, Andrea Shackle to Paskanky, on Elon Musk buying Twitter, part two, publicly traded companies have different levels of scrutiny.
Are you concerned about, you know, a billionaire taking control of the company that...
Where there is already a lot of concentration of power?
Check out her answer.
Maybe just add to it that, you know, publicly traded companies have different levels of, there's different levels of, you know, scrutiny that are possible of publicly traded companies.
So are you concerned about, you know, a billionaire taking control of a company where there's already a lot of concentration of power?
Piskanky at her finest.
And if you noticed, she was piercing her lips just a few minutes ago.
So here she is.
Curtis Hawk is reporting.
Piskanky on must-buying Twitter.
Our concerns are not new.
We've long talked about the residents, has long talked about his concerns about the power of social platforms.
Including Twitter to spread misinformation, disinformation, and the need for them to be held accountable.
Okay, so here we go again, all right?
It is completely another conversation when it lands on the other foot.
It shouldn't surprise you, but here it is.
I would say that our concerns are not new.
We've long talked about, and the President has long talked about his concerns about the power of social media platforms, including Twitter and others, to spread misinformation, disinformation, the need for these platforms to be held accountable.
Well, I know you tried again.
I appreciate that.
I still don't have a specific comment on this specific transaction.
And at this point, we don't have any sense of what the policies will look like.
So, of course, like I say, they don't care when it's on the other side.
When you look at Facebook, when you look at, and I see that we already have iGrockett over there in Twitch talking about, like Steve Jobs' wife owning the Atlantic.
When you've got Jeff Bezos, who owns the Washington Compost.
Okay, there are many examples of how they have used propaganda.
This is just day one.
This is just the morning after.
Nothing has actually happened yet and they are completely in meltdown mode and the reactions are just priceless.
In fact, I'm going to head over to Cat Turd's page because he had a nice one that he was pointing out as well.
I mean, think about the wins here.
This is really a time to celebrate because you know that we are starting to gain traction.
Alright, so, Bobby Burak over on Twitter.
He says, Rogan announced 2 million new subscribers.
Yamal Hill failed again.
Bomani failed again.
Judge struck down travel mask mandates.
Spotify dropped Michelle Obama.
Okay, this is a great sign.
People are starting to talk to one another, and that is what is so interesting, especially here in a blue state like LA. I mean, in California.
I live in LA, for example, so I'm surrounded by liberals completely.
I have a lot of very good friends that are liberals.
But the thing about it is they're not even associating with what is going on here.
They don't like it either.
They think it is absolutely crazy what's going on, and they don't want to be a part of it.
They think it's awful with how far the left has gone.
They don't recognize their party anymore.
I tease sometimes, and I'm like, oh, please tell me you didn't vote for the resident.
Because it's kind of my little, my jab back at orange man bad syndrome, because that's all I heard.
So when I start talking about Joe Biden, it's almost like, be careful what you asked for, or be careful what you did, because it may come back to haunt you.
And in this case, it really is.
The left is really in a downward spiral, and rightfully so.
They earned it.
They absolutely earned it.
So we go on to talk about all of the different things that they are now worried about.
Okay, so you've got Twitter.
They're fearing sabotage by left-wing staff after must take over.
The developers are blocked from app after rebellious employees called deal dangerous for democracy.
And hysterical liberal social media personalities threaten to quit social media giant.
I think it's funny as few of them have but it's not going to make the difference when you have as many people on Twitter as you do.
I mean you're talking about millions upon millions and that's why taking on something like Twitter Seriously, Elon Musk.
I know a lot of people said, start your own.
That could buy you quite a deal.
But this is already set up.
The thing about it is, is that they are not able to mess with this anymore.
Furious Twitter employees bombarded site and internal message boards with attacks on controversial tycoon.
Complaints ranged from fears of danger to democracy to complaints that they could be forced to stop WFH. You had Jamil, who led the charge of celebrities announcing they would abandon Twitter after Musk's purchase.
Okay, well, guess what?
I haven't looked at a celebrity tweet, and I cannot tell you how long.
That's not what I'm looking for when I get on Twitter.
Maybe other people are.
Not for me.
I mean, I think of things like that that's more kind of like an Instagram thing, I guess, or Facebook, something like that.
When I go to Twitter, it's because I want to see what's going on in the world.
I want to see what's happening politically.
I want to see what the conversation is.
I want to see how people are weighing in on it.
It's really interesting to get a whole bunch of different views.
This is what they are totally worried about.
They were able to completely keep us quiet forever.
Well, now they can't do it anymore.
So now it's just basically a toss-up.
And this is from the Gateway Pundit who is reporting.
It's Obama and censorship versus Elon Musk and free speech.
Will America and the civilized world win?
Of course.
Of course we are going to win.
You're already seeing it.
Those examples that Cat Turd had on his Twitter page, you can already see what's happening.
We are winning.
Freedom of speech versus tyranny and censorship.
Will America and the world follow Elon Musk's vision of Twitter or Barack Obama's call for more censorship?
Well, Frank Gaffney released his Secure Freedom Minute this morning.
Today's minute discussed the long-term highway that humanity will travel.
Will America and the world follow Barack Obama and censorship of free speech?
Or will it follow free speech as espoused by Elon Musk during his efforts to purchase Twitter?
Which way will we go?
Will the First Amendment die or thrive?
I think you're going to see the First Amendment do incredible things as a result of all of this.
This last year has been incredibly dark.
People are afraid to say what's on their mind.
They're afraid to offend to the point where...
You don't even want to say anything at all because you could be politically incorrect.
It is amazing what they have been able to get away with.
I mean truly amazing.
In fact, they have even got Google who is going to change words so that you can make sure that you are, you know, that you're using the right gender types and things like that and just in your conversation.
It makes absolute zero sense, which is why they're trying to sabotage.
They were very concerned that this was going to happen.
They were going to release a bug into this whole thing, and rightfully so.
I think that we are seeing a completely different world, and I think it's going to go the absolute opposite side.
So, we've got all of this going on, and you've got the left.
Believe me, they are working on something as a response to all of this.
You know that they are.
This is out from the Gateway Pundit.
Leaders of Zuckerberg's nonpartisan election fund ID'd Obama's campaign manager and Clinton's chief strategist.
Okay.
So, Metta...
CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan spent more than $300 million on 2020 election.
The couple said that the money was intended to support nonpartisan effort to expand voting access, but a simple look at their staff calls this claim into question.
Rigged shows just how Zuckerberg and Chan used their money specifically to help Democrats in the 2020 election.
It is out now and you can get your copy for $4.99.
So, in the bombshell documentary, Citizens United President David Bossie revealed a shocking member of the leadership team for Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
His name is David Plough and he is best known for serving as campaign manager for Democrat Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential election cycle.
If that was not enough, Plough also wrote a book titled A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump.
Okay, do you need any more than that?
Probably not to know that this is definitely a partisan effort.
Since the initiative was supposed to be nonpartisan, the fact that a member of its leadership team was developing a strategy to take down one of the presidential candidates certainly raises some red flags.
You think?
In addition, Bossy said Chan and Zuckerberg wanted to use Plough specifically for his strategic mind.
Their website listed him as a strategist in residence.
The initiative was also connected to Joel Benison, who is the chief strategist for Democrat Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, Bossy revealed in the firm.
If you want to see exactly how Zuckerberg used his money and power to help Joe Biden win the 2020, you can buy Rigged here.
And I'm going to go ahead and drop that.
I'm going to go straight to that site so that you can check it out.
But you can buy it here.
And I'm going to drop this into the chat room so that all of you have it.
So you can purchase it.
But it's amazing.
They just do this right in front of our eyes.
And you've got Republicans that aren't even doing anything about it.
The leadership on our side is just not there.
So let me grab this one for the other group over there on all of our other chat rooms.
Okay, so this is a very big deal.
You think they know how to spend money?
You think they know how to target the money for Democrat turnout?
You bet they do.
In an opinion article for the Washington Times, Bossy said this is exactly what Chan Zuckerberg initiative did.
The group that got the bulk of Mr.
Zuckerberg's money, the Center for Tech and Civic Life, sent some 2,500 grants to government election offices in 48 states.
He was describing all of this.
Defenders of Mr.
Zuckerberg contend that more grants went to Trump areas while conveniently ignoring the fact that the vast amount of money was targeted to critically important areas for Mr.
Biden.
In fact, approximately 160 of the 2,500 grants were for $400,000 or more and totaled a whopping $272 million and 92% of the money flowed to jurisdictions that Biden carried.
RIGGED exposes Zuckerberg's plot to tip the scales for Biden in 2020 and it is out now, so you can definitely check it all out.
I just think it's fascinating what we are starting to find out here with all of this.
And when I mentioned that you have big tech, they're going to start really trying to side together.
They're not going to know what to do, but they're going to end up falling apart.
Because they don't want these rules to apply to the other side.
Understand that.
They don't want to show you that there is a difference.
But right now, with Elon Musk and what he is doing by bringing these conservative voices back on Twitter, we are going to be able to have that conversation and you are going to be able to tell the difference between one platform And another.
So this should come to no surprise.
You've got red state, big tech to the rescue.
Google will now inclusively convert your words to wokeness.
Okay, they're going to do that for you, right?
Okay.
And when I mean leaders, I just mean elected officials.
I'm sorry.
Thank you very much for pointing that out, PatriotMom62.
You're right.
They lead nothing.
They're on their heels constantly.
Spineless jellyfish.
But anyway, when it comes to choosing words, do you wish Google would save you from yourself?
For those intent upon expression but afraid of causing offense, the tech company was put on the rescue vest.
So Google Docs has introduced a new feature that will warn you if you type words it considers unacceptable.
Make a wrong move and you'll be told your choice may not be inclusive to all readers.
The software will direct you to words sufficiently woke.
So if you go on savage with something like landlord, you'll be turned on to property owner or proprietor.
Make the macho mistake of mankind and you'll be corrected to the tune of humankind.
Go full Neanderthal with policemen and police officers will be served up.
And if you go completely wild with housewife, for goodness sakes, respect a stay-at-home spouse.
Curbing speech is currently all the rage.
Okay, this is so unreal that we are even having these kinds of discussions.
I mean, I don't care how people describe things.
I really don't care what words they use.
In certain circumstances, you'll see people say things and they really don't mean it in an offensive manner.
But oh my gosh, if somebody can take offense to that, what are they going to do?
They're going to punish you.
They are going to say that that is completely, you know, politically incorrect, that you hurt someone's feelings, that you are, you know, and they shame you.
And that's how they've been able to work it thus far.
But too many people are waking up and they're saying, okay, well, what can I say?
I mean, how can I be funny?
How can I crack a joke?
Dave Chappelle is one of them.
And I think that's really what came to light is when...
It wasn't funny anymore.
You couldn't be funny anymore.
And he's a hilarious comedian.
And they were shutting him down because they found it inappropriate.
Well, I guess you could find anything inappropriate if you looked hard enough.
Even Disney, a cultural institution founded upon entertaining ladies, gentlemen, boys and girls, no longer does so.
So it's no longer they've gotten rid of ladies and gentlemen.
It bounces to boys and girls in the name of inclusion.
Crazy.
So inclusion is a tricky thing.
So tricky, in fact, it's impossible.
If someone excludes a word in the name of inclusion, they've already lost the battle.
Furthermore, there is no such thing as one word which inclusivity enchants all the universal audience while another word meaning the exact same thing does not.
As some will prefer one word and others its alternative, there is in the end only the word that you yourself wish to use.
How are you supposed to know that?
I mean, it makes absolutely zero sense.
So you're doomed before you even speak a word.
And some in contemporary culture wish for your wishes not to come true.
So back to Google, the New York Post reports the feature has a quirky sense.
Vice writers found that when they attempted to write in the words annoyed and motherboard, these seemingly innocuous terms were flagged for being insufficiently inclusive.
Meanwhile, a transcription of an interview with the former Ku Klux Klan leader, David Duke, where he uses the N-word and says a host of other reprehensible things about black people raised no red flags.
Interesting.
From Vice, even Jesus doesn't get off easily.
Rather than talking about God's wonderful works in the Sermon on the Mount, Google's robot asserts he should have used the words great, marvelous, or lovely.
Do you see how ridiculous this has gotten?
Anyway, so they're going to destroy themselves.
I see, like, a complete collapse on the horizon.
But at least we can celebrate because this is a very, very big day for us.
I mean, the Elon takeover, Elon Musk is really something.
And I just think...
My gosh, here's a real opportunity, and especially with the timing when you start looking at the midterms.
So we do have a little bit of breaking news.
So I'm going to go ahead and start with that.
Okay, so this is right out from thedailymail.com.
Exclusive, Joe's missing millions.
Financial records revealed Joe Biden had 5.2 in unexplained income.
As emails show, he paid Hunter's legal bills for one megabucks Chinese deal and was tapped as big guy to get a 10% cut in another country.
Okay.
When you have a rag like DailyMail.com reporting these things, you know that there's a lot to this story.
So emails from Hunter's laptop reveal that Joe Biden agreed to pay his son's legal fees for his deal with a Chinese government-controlled company.
Joe was able to pay the bills after earning millions of dollars through his and his wife's companies after he left office as vice president.
Remember, they were seeing all of these people at the White House when he was vice president.
He, I mean the resident, Joe Biden, when he was vice president.
So, but an analysis by DailyMail.com of the resident's financial record shows 5.2 million is unexplained.
The missing millions in emails on Hunter's abandoned laptop suggest Joe would have had a 10% share in Hunter's blockbuster deal with the Chinese.
The revelation ties the resident even closer to Hunter's overseas business dealings, despite the White House's denials.
Okay, they're not going to be able to continue on this path.
I certainly hope not.
They're trying to duck and cover everywhere that they can, but this is coming to the surface.
So Joe Biden agreed to pay Sun Hunter's legal fees for his deal with a Chinese government-controlled company, and this is according to emails.
The revelation ties the resident even closer to Hunter's overseas business dealings and makes his previous claim that he never discussed them with his son even less plausible.
Joe was able to pay the bills after earning millions of dollars through his and his wife's companies after he left office as vice president.
Some of the wave of cash came from their book deals and speaking engagements, but the residents' financial filings reveal he declared almost seven million more income on his tax returns than he did on his government transparency reports and analysis by Daily Mail of the residents' financial records show.
So this is a really, really big deal.
Some of that difference can be accounted for with salaries earned by First Lady Jill Biden, and other sums not required on his report, but still leaves five point two earned by Joe's company and not listed on his transparency records.
The missing millions combined with emails on Hunter's abandoned laptop suggesting Joe would have 10 percent share in Hunter's blockbuster deal with the Chinese, raising a troubling question.
Did Joe Biden receive money from the foreign venture?
Okay, so there you have it.
And here are the actual bills.
So the subject is Hunter Bills, and this is an email.
It was from 117.19 at 3.26 p.m.
from Katie Dodge.
And it's going to Linda Shapiro, and it is ceasing Richard Ruffner and Robert Biden.
Hello, VP Team.
I spoke with Hunter today regarding his bills.
It is my understanding that Hunt's dad will cover these bills in the short term as Hunter transitions in his career.
I have a list of the current bills of which I am aware.
I have attached the list below.
I am sure we will need to go over all of this to make a smooth transition.
Many I can log into and change the bank accounts or I can give you the logins.
At any rate, I wanted to get the ball rolling.
Please let me know what is convenient time for this call.
That said, I am traveling for the holiday weekend beginning tomorrow and will be back to my office Tuesday.
So, also, as it is understandable, I will no longer be working for Hunter after January 31st.
I will, of course, remain in touch if you have any further questions.
And she goes on to thank them.
What a wonderful relationship and great project they do together.
So, in January 2019...
Hunter's assistant Katie Dodge wrote an email to the bookkeeper Linda Shapiro and Biden aide Richard Ruffner saying Joe had agreed to pay his hundreds of thousands of dollars of bills.
That's huge.
Huge.
One of the last items on the spreadsheet of Hunter's bills was for $28,000 in legal fees for restructuring of Hunter's joint venture with the Chinese government-controlled Bank of China.
The spreadsheet listed the bill as a Fager Baker Daniels BHR restructuring costing $28,382 and due ASAP. Okay.
Well, you know, you know that they're going to dodge this like no other.
In fact, Peskanki, again, that's what I call her, but Psaki says Biden never spoke to Sun Hunter on overseas business.
Check this out.
On another topic, a lot of stories about Hunter Biden surfacing this week.
So, to ensure the independence of the investigation, would the President support the appointment of a special counsel?
Ms.
Well, first, the President has never had a conversation with the Department of Justice about any investigations into any member of his family.
He said that during the campaign, and he will continue to abide by that.
So I'd point to the Department of Justice for any additional steps they would take.
They would make those decisions independently.
The Press is there any concern that they're not going to be necessarily seen as being able to make the decisions independently if the White House Chief of Staff is out saying that the President is confident his son did not break the law?
Ms.
Well, that's something the President has said, and certainly we would echo.
But in the same answer to that question, Peter, during an interview this week on Den ABC, Ron Klain also said the Justice Department is independent and they will make their own decisions.
The Press And the President has said that he never spoke to his son about his overseas business dealings.
Is that still the case?
Ms.
Yes.
Hmm.
Okay, so we have that going on.
Of course, dodge, dodge, dodge.
And you are seeing a huge exodus from the White House.
There are a lot of people that are leaving before the midterms, including a speechwriter of Joe Biden's.
People cannot get out of there quick enough.
The ratings are horrible.
The polls, I mean, are terrible.
It's just they're the lowest ever.
And that's just what they allow you to see.
Remember, this is with the curve, right?
It's with a discount or a plus count, I should say, because they never want you to know how actually bad they're doing.
So here you go.
This is the statement of account.
You've got all of this.
And again, this is from the DailyMail.com.
Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who, along with Senator Chuck Grassley, is investigating Hunter's foreign business deal, said Joe Biden's unaccounted for millions of Are another disturbing piece of information that raises questions that deserve answers, right?
This was supposed to be the most transparent, okay, presidency we've ever seen.
That's what they ran on anyway.
Now keep in mind this whole entire time when Biden was running and when he was campaigning, Now, all of a sudden, again...
You wait a couple of months and all of these conspiracy theories end up being true.
All of a sudden, it's been proven that it's all factual, that it's all real, that it does exist, and oopsie, we made a mistake.
No, you interfered with an election.
The same things that you were going to and expected, you were going to accuse Elon Musk and Twitter of doing just by us being able to have the conversation.
They want complete and total control.
One of the worst things that I think that ever—well, there were plenty, but what Obama did—oh, Biden, I get used to saying that—was when Obama was president, he made it legal for the media to purposely lie to the American people.
In 2012, he signed H.R. 4310, which allowed propaganda to be used on U.S. citizens by its own government, essentially repealing the Smith-Munt Act of 1948, which banned the use of domestic propaganda.
He sent us back.
We are regressing.
We are not progressing.
This is a real problem, and it needs to be reversed, and it needs to be fixed.
Otherwise, you're going to have what we've had the last couple of years.
So all of this was on Hunter's laptop, and no one was allowed to post any of this.
Of course, I'm sure You all knew because you keep up on the news.
I saw all of this stuff.
It ended up in my DMs constantly, and I don't need to see Hunter Biden in that way anymore.
Thank you.
I've seen all of him I want to see.
But thedailymail.com obtained a copy of the abandoned laptop hard drive and commissioned the founder of the FBI's cyber forensic unit to analyze it.
Their report found the contents were genuine and there was no evidence of tampering by Russians or anyone else.
However, since that time, the FBI has lost the laptop, Hunter Biden's laptop or so they claim.
We still have copies of that everywhere.
Thank goodness there were copies made because you know exactly what happened to Hillary Clinton's 30,000 emails.
Okay?
The FBI is completely corrupt to the core to even handle investigations.
When they go in, I think immediately to myself, okay, so what are they going to cover up this time?
It's horrible.
It really is.
Just when you think it can't get any worse, it does.
Because it's so obvious, and you don't have the check and balance when it comes to the corruption that we're witnessing.
So, the resident's son is under federal investigation for tax offenses, money laundering, and illegal lobbying for foreign clients.
Joe's financial transparency disclosures show that he had more than enough money to foot Hunter's huge bills.
While in office, Joe had a relatively modest income, but he enjoyed a flood of millions of dollars soon after he left office, much of which came from his memoir book deal and eye-watering speaking fees.
Between 2017 and 2019, he and First Lady Jill Biden reported $16.5 million in gross income on their federal tax returns released by the Biden campaign.
The vast majority came from their two companies, Celtic Capri Corp and Giacoppa Corp, which they use for speaking and writing engagements.
But the Office of Government Ethics, OGE, filings, for the same period, Joe only reported $9.6 million in income for himself and his wife.
Can you imagine if this was Trump right now?
I mean, seriously?
Think about that for a second.
This guy would have already been gone.
He would have been impeached, for sure.
Probably worse.
So Joe Biden's 2019 disclosures to the Office of Government Ethics shows he received millions through his company, Celtic Capricorp, but fails to account for all of the $16.5 million shown in his tax filing.
Okay.
Now, we all know about the tax filing, right?
I mean, they're still not over President Trump's tax filings.
They cannot stop talking about it.
So why aren't the Republicans gearing up and doing nothing but the same?
Well, the White House released resident Joe Biden's tax return last Friday, revealing that the first couple made more than $600,000 last year.
Remember, that went all over the news.
Joe's 2017 federal tax return shows $11 million of adjusted gross income, almost $4.6 million in 2018, and $985,233 in 2019.
That's a total of about $16.5 million.
Okay, so between 2017 and 2019, he and First Lady Jill Biden reported $16.5 million in gross income on their federal tax returns released by the Biden campaign.
In Joe Biden's 2018 amended federal tax return document, it showed a total of $4,580,437.
So, I mean, $4,580,437.
So, the remaining roughly $7 million came from wages earned by the First Lady from her Northern Virginia Community College teaching job.
And a salary she paid herself from Giacoppa, which the couple were not required to report to the OGE. This is amazing to me.
This is really something.
And like I said, the fact that you have got the Daily Mail reporting all of this lets you know how big this is.
It's really spectacular.
But a comparison of the income reported by Joe from a Celtic Capri company on OGE Reports versus what he told the IRS shows a difference of almost $5.2 million, which remains unaccounted for.
So no conclusive evidence has yet emerged that Joe profited from any of Hunter's business dealings.
But that is to be determined.
This is, like I said, a softball there.
The potential discrepancy in the resident's financial filings and his alleged links to Hunter Chinese Ventures raised troubling questions over where the unexplained $5,180,071 came from.
I can guarantee you there's a lot more than that.
As you know, Hunter was just complaining about how he was tired of paying for everything.
So there are many family members involved in this whole entire situation.
And considering they move as a unit, I don't know why we aren't investigating each and every single one of them.
Because all roads lead to Rome.
And I think that's where you're going to find the smoking gun.
The numbers don't lie.
And if you follow them, and if you follow the money, you normally will be able to scout it out.
So Joe's OGE filing submitted in 2019 shows around $8,699,787.
Hey, it's just Joe.
You know, regular old Joe.
He's making $9 million dollars.
For him and Jill from 2017 through May 2019.
This includes the $7,451,727 which he said came from Celtic Capricorp.
So his OGE form submitted in May 2020 added another $907,160 that wasn't paid until after their 2019 report, bringing the total for the period $9,606,947 and the total for Celtic Capri to $8,065.
This is huge, really.
When you start looking at all of this, and I'm sure you've got people on edge.
In fact, it looks like Merrick Garland is already talking about all of the tax probes.
He's already releasing a statement over there.
This is a very serious situation.
Let's see what he has to say.
Because they're having to answer for this, looks like, pretty rapidly.
So, DailyMail.com, a follow-up to this.
Merrick Garland insists Biden has not interfered into the investigation of his son Hunter and points out the tax probe is being run by a Trump appointee during grilling from Republicans.
Oh, isn't that just absolutely convenient as ever?
So, the Attorney General was grilled by a panel of Senators, and this was today, about President Joe Biden's 2023 budget for the Department of Justice.
Tennessee Senator Bill Haggerty asked Garland if Biden had invited him into the Oval Office to tell him that Hunter Biden had done nothing wrong.
Garland vehemently denied the resident ever doing such a thing.
Meanwhile, Biden's son is embroiled in a federal tax fraud investigation linked to his business dealings, which I just, which I'm reading to you, in Ukraine and China, some while his father was vice president.
A recent report claims Biden met with one of his son's business partners in 2010, but the resident has publicly denied ever discussing business with his son.
Okay, so we have nothing but corruption.
This is unreal here, and I am just hoping that That they are going to, of course, ask for special counsel to get involved.
Somebody that is completely independent of this administration, just like they did with President Trump.
We would expect to see that, no matter who is on the ticket, and especially whoever is running the country, especially with all the dealings that we're facing overseas.
And the fact that we are in basically a war, no, one has not been declared by Congress.
However, we are definitely in a war if we are supplying the Ukraine with millions upon millions of dollars in not only equipment, but also money and everything else.
So this is a huge, huge deal.
There also, we've got a lot of great things that have happened with President Trump.
As a result, a lot of the work that he did is saving us through this difficult time.
And this is an article from Breitbart.
Trump-appointed judge announces he will block Biden from ending Title 42 at the border.
That's a huge deal.
I'm glad that people are giving President Trump the credit that he deserves.
So a federal judge in Louisiana appointed by former President Donald Trump is expected to block President Joe Biden's plans to end the Title 42 Public Health Authority at the United States-Mexico border.
That is a very big deal.
As you know, they want to just open up the floodgates, and that is a huge, huge disaster on our borders.
I live in Southern California.
I know exactly what it looks like here in border towns in San Diego and all of that.
It's a real, real problem.
So the Supreme Court hears the case over ending Remain in Mexico rule for asylum seekers.
Let's hope something good comes out of that.
So they're going to hear the oral arguments today and it will determine whether the Biden administration can terminate the so-called Remain in Mexico policy.
It was a rule first implemented under former President Donald Trump that requires migrants arriving at the southern border to wait outside the U.S. for their asylum hearings.
That's a very big deal, and I think that's great.
I think it's great that this is all going to be put on the table.
That was a fabulous policy because you did not have people running around this country unaccounted for.
Of course, you've got Piskanki and everybody else that are releasing them into the United States with cell phones.
You can't make this up.
You absolutely cannot make it up.
Not in any way.
And then you've got Durham who details the massive effort against Trump and destroys Clinton's team's claim.
Of course, Hillary Clinton is about to find herself in a whole bunch of hot water.
And even though she's been able to escape it up to this point, you cannot deny the fact that she had absolutely everything to do with spying on President Trump and also, not only that, the fake dossier.
She did everything in her power to destroy him, both when he was a candidate and then also when he was President of the United States.
You want to talk about a huge situation here.
I do not know how she gets out of this one.
So, Special Counsel John Durham has filed a response to the effort by Michael Sussman, Perkins Coy, Hillary for America, HFA, a Democrat National Committee, DNC Fusion GPS, and And tech executive one Rodney Jaffe to claim their communications were privileged legal communications to keep them secret.
Durham has a little laugh at the beginning of this filing, noting how Sussman has claimed he wasn't representing anyone when he went to the FBI. The very thing is he is charged with lying about.
So these efforts have trapped him and them.
As they previously pointed out, and it's so true.
This is just like one lie after another after another.
Durham also derides the claim that Fusion was hired for legal work, calling that a novel way to cover up opposition research.
And the derogatory information that they then spread against President Donald Trump and his team.
He says that despite efforts, the parties have failed to provide meaningful, substantive explanations to support these continuing broad assertions of privilege and or work product protections.
But because Durham intends to call a Fusion GPS employee as a witness in the trial to presumably speak to the communications, he says this is why they need to resolve the question at this point as to the communications and whether they are privileged.
The fact that he has a Fusion employee that's going to flip on them is not good for Fusion or the Hillary team because she will likely lay out more of the plot publicly and that's not going to go well for them.
So this is really great news.
Like I said, we're winning.
We really, really are winning all of this.
And it's all coming to light.
We've known about it.
But of course, even though we knew about it, the thing about it is, is that we weren't allowed to report on it.
They were shutting down our accounts every possible way that they could.
And they were putting us on lists and they were affecting other accounts.
There was no question in my mind that they followed my account on Twitter when they shut it down when I was over there.
Followed it on to Facebook and shadow banned me there because I really wasn't doing a whole lot.
And then on YouTube.
And everything else.
They knew exactly who we all were and they were able to keep tabs on how we were organizing, what we were talking about, our conversation.
And that's why I was surprised that they even kicked us off because when they were able to watch our DMs, our direct messages, and watch us Communicate and organize and talk about discoveries and research.
They did themselves a disservice because they lost all of that information.
We found other ways to start communicating with each other, whether it be email, telephone, or going to other platforms.
And that is what has gotten us where we are now.
This is the last bit on this.
Indeed, the documents produced by Fusion GPS to date reflect hundreds of emails in which Fusion GPS employees shared raw, unverified, and uncooperated information, including their own draft research and work product with reporters.
And they appear to have done so as part of a largely successful effort to trigger negative stories about one of the presidential candidates.
Well, we know who that particular one is.
They completely went after President Trump With everything that they possibly had.
And that is why they are going after Marjorie Taylor Greene is because they want to be able to control who gets on a ticket.
They want to take that away from the American people too.
And they will not win this.
I can assure you, they will not win this.
Anyway, the hour has flown.
Again, there's so much news and it goes so rapidly.
I appreciate you all hanging out with me.
I truly do.
I know it's not the same without the cat.
I miss him tremendously.
I just want him well.
And please keep him in your thoughts and prayers.
You are all just amazing.
And believe me, he is reading every single one of your comments and it means the absolute world to him.
Anyway, on that note, you just keep on praying, keep strong, keep working on it.
We're all going to be on Truth soon.
Hopefully a few of us will even make it back over to Twitter.
I'd love it.
I'd be one to join right away.
Sign me up.
I'm ready to get off the bench.
And that's why I've started tweeting again.
That was the one thing that I promised Cat Turd was that I was going to start tweeting because I was a little sour over the whole thing.
Anyway, please remember to like, share, subscribe, and hit the notification button so you know when we go live.
Be safe, be kind to one another, and we will see you later.