Vis Amir Shahi's eighth-grade documentary "Operation Ajax" exposes the 1953 U.S.-backed coup that overthrew Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mossadegh after he nationalized oil, rejecting British profit demands. The film details how Britain and the CIA framed Mossadegh as a communist threat to justify installing a dictator, sparking 25 years of royal rule and contributing to the 1979 Islamic Revolution. This intervention established a precedent for low-cost covert operations in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Chile, teaching Middle Eastern leaders that democracy lacks American protection. Ultimately, the episode argues such unauthorized interference violates democratic principles and urges the U.S. to consider long-term consequences before intervening abroad. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
Source
|
Time
Text
Democracy Unfiltered: C-SPAN Student Cam00:09:59
Scanning the QR code or at c-span shop.org.
Stay informed.
Stay engaged.
This year, as we mark the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, C-SPAN's Student Cam documentary competition invited students to create short films exploring themes from American history, the rights and freedoms rooted in this founding document, and pressing issues of today, from the economy and immigration to criminal justice, education, and healthcare.
Nearly 4,000 students from 38 states and Washington, D.C. took part in this year's competition.
Throughout this month, we're proud to showcase our top 21 winners.
This year's second prize middle school winner is Vis Amir Shahi, an eighth grader from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School in Germantown, Maryland, where our local partner is Carcass.
Her winning documentary is titled Operation Ajax: Defending Democracy by Undermining the Will of the People, about the 1953 U.S. coup in Iran, its contrast with American democratic ideals, and its effect on global affairs.
After World War II, the United States was seen as a beacon of hope and the protector of democracy all over the world.
However, that soon would change.
In 1951, the geopolitically crucial country of Iran democratically elected its first prime minister, Mohamed Mossadegh, a devoted nationalist politician.
Mossadegh was a very eminent Iranian politician as he was evolving as a politician.
It was during a period that Iran was under enormous amount of foreign pressure.
Iran finally was on its way towards democracy and it had a government that was democratically elected.
Therefore, that government had to respond to the overwhelming national challenge, which was we're sitting on an ocean of oil, but we're very poor and all the money from the oil is going to Britain.
And so Mossadegh was one of the very, very first politicians in what we now call the developing world that stood up for national rights and demanded that the British give Iran a better share.
And when the British refused, he insisted that, okay, give back all of our oil industry.
We want to nationalize it.
The British originally wanted actually to carry out military strikes against Iran to get them to put an end to their nationalization project for Iranian oil.
But they could not get the Truman administration to go along.
Truman thought that he could work something out with Mohamed Mossadegh.
When Eisenhower came into office, that all changed.
The British decided that although the reason we want to get rid of Mossadegh is because we want our oil company back, that would not be a good enough reason to persuade the Americans to get involved.
But recognizing this climate in Washington, where they were at a panic about communism, they sold it as an anti-communist operation, trying to frame Mossadegh as a person who might leave Iran Iran opened to communism.
So the United States saw things in black and white.
You know, there was no middle.
There was no position for you to say, I'm opposed to Western companies abusing my country, but I'm also opposed to communism.
The U.S. would not accept that position.
Very quickly, the CIA was, of course, the agency that was called on to take part in the planning.
There is a CIA document written by one of the planners of the coup, Donald Wilber, and it talks about a six-part plan that involved all kinds of things from sort of creating an environment of chaos and opposition to Mossadegh,
engaging in propaganda activities to undermine his position, working with the military, working with tribes, working with other forces inside society, working with the Shah himself to create conditions whereby Mossadegh's position would be rendered illegal.
On August 19th, 1953, the coup, codenamed Operation Ajax, was carried out by British and American agents.
Mossad Birk was thrown out of office and replaced by a military figurehead.
This was an earth-shattering event.
It's having effects right up to today.
It produced 25 years of royal dictatorship that ultimately produced the revolution of the late 1970s, which we call the Islamic Revolution.
That's led to this 40 years of rule by the Mullahs, which has been a regime that has worked to undermine American interests all over the world.
It taught a whole generation of rising leaders in the Middle East what they should do in order to have sympathy and a security umbrella from the United States.
And that was do not take the root of democracy.
The Americas will not tolerate that.
You're not going to have a lot of trouble if you go the democracy route.
This idea that the U.S. could come in to a foreign country and under wraps, covertly, influence events to such an extent that they could change a government.
This was a very appealing, tempting idea because it was low cost.
It didn't involve the U.S. troops.
It wasn't going to start a war.
It was something that they could deny.
So there were lots of reasons why this caught the imagination of people like Mike Dallas and Eisenhower and presidents following Eisenhower.
Because then the United States, after 1953, would go down this path of interfering in domestic politics of countries that had nationalist leaders in Indonesia, in Vietnam, in Chile, in Honduras, in Guatemala, in varieties of countries following the same model that they had done in Iran.
What should be the lesson learned by the United States, and how do these coups contrast with the state of ideals in the Declaration of Independence?
When there have been acts of direct intervention in another country's affairs, for whatever purpose, noble or ignoble, there has to be a recognition that local populations are not going to necessarily see it the way that you would like them to.
So the lesson is before you act decisively to intervene in the affairs of another country, think through what the long-term effects might be.
We promote democracy, right?
We always said that we're the beacon of democracy, right?
That we want to support democratic governments.
But whenever an outside country interferes in the affairs of another country without being invited in by the people of that country to do that, it basically by nature is undemocratic.
You're doing it without any respect for the will of the people.
You're doing it based on criteria that you think impacts you, and therefore you should go all the way around the world and change a government in order to protect your own interests.
Now, you could say governments can always do that, but then not if at the same time they're talking about human rights and democratic values, because this is a clear violation of a right of the people to choose their own destiny.
Be sure to watch all of the winning entries on our website at studentcam.org.
C-SPAN, bringing you democracy unfiltered.
You're watching C-SPAN.
Democracy Unfiltered.
C-SPAN brings you democracy unfiltered in real time.
Democracy doesn't take sides.
Neither does C-SPAN.
In a world full of opinions, C-SPAN gives you direct access to the people and institutions that shape our nation.
Unfiltered coverage of Congress as laws are debated and decided.
Live proceedings from the United States Supreme Court.
Presidential speeches, briefings, and historic moments as they happen.
No commentary, no spin, no agenda.
Just the democratic process presented in full without interruption so you can watch the debates, hear every word, and make up your own mind.
C-SPAN's respected nonprofit service has offered Americans unfiltered gabble-to-gabble coverage of their government in action.
C-SPAN, bringing your democracy unfiltered.
C-SPAN is brought to you by the cable, satellite, and streaming companies that provide C-SPAN as a public service.
Today, former U.S. Senator Mitt Romney speaks about the state of democracy and governance in the United States as part of the John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum.
From Harvard University's Institute of Politics, watch it live at 6 p.m. Eastern on C-SPAN, C-SPAN Now, our free mobile app, and C-SPAN.org.
And then at 7.30 p.m. Eastern, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sits down for a conversation on American politics as she retires from Congress after 20 terms.
She'll chat with former CNN Washington Bureau Chief Frank Cesno.
From George Washington University, watch that conversation live on C-SPAN, C-SPAN Now, our free mobile app, and online at c-SPAN.org.
Get C-SPAN wherever you are with C-SPAN Now, our free mobile video app that puts you at the center of democracy, live and on demand.
Keep up with the day's biggest events with live streams of floor proceedings and hearings from the U.S. Congress, White House events, the courts, campaigns, and more from the world of politics, all at your fingertips.
Catch the latest episodes of Washington Journal.
Find scheduling information for C-SPAN's TV and radio networks, plus a variety of compelling podcasts.
The C-SPAN Now app is available at the Apple Store and Google Play.
Download it for free today.
C-SPAN, Democracy Unfiltered.
Paul Atkins on Financial Policy00:01:00
Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins talks about U.S. financial policy.
He addresses capital market regulation, modernization and financial innovation, digital currency regulation, and the implementation of artificial intelligence.
This is just under half an hour.
So, good morning, ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues and friends.
First of all, allow me to thank warmly the IMF and especially Tobias and his team for the excellent organization and for co-hosting this already third annual IMF ISCO conference.
I think it's fair to say that when we started to discuss with Tobias some years ago the possibility to organize this conference, it was, I would say, something amazing.
I'm not sure that not so many people would have thought that it was such a success.