All Episodes
June 13, 2025 06:16-06:26 - CSPAN
09:56
Speaker Johnson Talks To Reporters
Participants
Appearances
m
mike johnson
rep/r 04:54
Clips
a
adam goodman
r 00:04
a
alex padilla
sen/d 00:05
c
chad pergram
fox 00:05
|

Speaker Time Text
Senate Disruption Incident 00:05:56
mike johnson
No violence, no vandalism.
alex padilla
Please continue peacefully protesting, and that's all I will have to say today.
unidentified
Thank you, Senator.
Can you give us an instance?
Why did you come in and do that?
mike johnson
Why did you disrupt it?
unidentified
House Speaker Mike Johnson spoke about the detainment and removal of Senator Padilla from a DHS presser.
Speaker Johnson began his remarks by highlighting the passage of a rescissions package that codified $9.4 billion in Doge cuts by the House.
mike johnson
Good afternoon, everybody.
Under President Trump's leadership, your taxpayer dollars are no longer being wasted.
Instead, we are fulfilling the promises we made to the American people.
We're going to be better stewards of that here.
And now we're directing all of this towards priorities that truly benefit the American people.
This is a long time overdue.
We just had an important vote here on the floor.
Today's passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step towards a more responsible and transparent government that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first.
We want to thank Doge for their heroic and patriotic efforts.
That work led to this.
This package eliminates $9.4 billion in unnecessary and wasteful spending at the State Department, USAID, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds politically biased media outlets like NPR and PBS.
It's just one of the ways that Republicans are codifying Doge's findings and putting taxpayer dollars to better use.
There'll be more of this in the days ahead.
We had hoped our Democrat colleagues would join us in this effort.
It's an important one.
All we're trying to do is ensure that every dollar spent by the federal government is used efficiently and effectively.
But rather than expressing concern over the misuse and misspending of funds, our Democrat colleagues have another idea.
They have instead chosen to oppose these reforms simply because Republicans are leading the charge.
While they defend the failed toxic status quo, Republicans will continue to deliver real accountability and restore fiscal discipline.
As has been said many times with this administration, President Trump's leadership, and here with Republicans in the House and the Senate, it's about promises made and promises kept, and we'll continue doing that.
chad pergram
Mr. Question, did federal agents go too far the way they treated Senator Padilla today?
mike johnson
Was that a bridge too far?
I saw the same video, a very brief video that I think many people did.
I think the senator's actions, my view is it was wildly inappropriate.
You don't charge a sitting cabinet secretary, and everybody can draw their own conclusions.
You can see it's a heated debate here.
I'm not going to respond to that.
Look, let me just, hold on, wait just a second.
I think the American people can draw their own conclusions.
They saw a senator acting like wildly inappropriate.
I'll leave it at that.
unidentified
So what about the police?
mike johnson
What I saw was agents asking him to quiet him down so that the secretary could continue her press conference.
He refused to do so.
What were they supposed to do?
They have to restrain someone who is engaging in that kind of behavior.
They moved him out of the room.
A sitting member of Congress should not act like that.
It is beneath a member of Congress.
It is beneath a U.S. Senator.
They're supposed to lead by example, and that is not a good example.
We have to turn the temperature down in this country and not escalate it.
The Democrat Party is on the wrong side.
They are defending lawbreakers, and now they are acting like lawbreakers themselves.
unidentified
That's getting oversight, Mr. Speaker.
mike johnson
That's oversight, charging a cabinet secretary in a press conference.
I beg to differ.
I think the people do as well.
I think those actions speak for themselves.
unidentified
What did you say about lowering the temperature in the country right now?
mike johnson
What would you say to the people?
You know, Scott, I have things to say about lowering the temperature all the time.
I am very consistent in this.
We have been trying to do this since I was handed the gavelin before.
I founded the Honor and Civility Caucus in the Congress for Crying Out Loud when I got here in 2017.
I think that we should act according to our offices.
We have a duty and a responsibility to set a tone, an example in our actions.
And I encourage every member of this body to do it in the House and Senate.
We have to turn the temperature down.
We need to be on the side of the rule of law.
We need to be on the side of law and order.
We need to be on the side of calm and not chaos.
And when members go into these settings and act this way, that when they push law enforcement agents around, when they storm cabinet secretaries in a press conference, I think it's wildly inappropriate behavior, and I think it sets a terrible message and tone for the rest of the country.
Will there be an investigation?
unidentified
Will there be a House investigation?
mike johnson
This is a Senate side issue, but I certainly hope that behavior is not repeated over here.
We are.
I am.
unidentified
This affects all members, whether they be in the House or Senate.
You're the Speaker of the House.
mike johnson
You're the Constitutional Officer of this branch.
Yeah, and what of it?
unidentified
The idea that you said this is a Senate issue.
This isn't, I mean, these are members of Congress.
mike johnson
I mean, yeah, but the Senate does its disciplinary actions over there, and we do ours over here.
We have a certain set of measures, as you all know, and it ranges from censure to removal from committees to ultimately expulsion from the body.
Do you support that for the senator?
It's not my decision to make.
I'm not in that chamber, but I do think that it merits immediate attention by their colleagues over there.
I think that behavior at a moment is it rises to the level of a censure.
I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we are going to do.
That's not how we're going to act.
We're not going to have branches fighting physically and having senators charging cabinet secretaries.
We've got to do better, and I hope that we will.
But I want to say this is a good day for the House Chamber.
The first residence package is now passed through the House.
I expect it'll pass through the Senate.
C-SPAN Parades and Politics 00:04:15
mike johnson
I expect our one big beautiful bill will continue to be processed as it is, and that we'll get it back and get it done on a tight schedule.
I'm still trying to meet our July 4th deadline so we can have a celebration on Independence Day.
And having good legislation passed will put everybody in a better mood.
So I'm looking forward to that.
Will you meet with the CSA?
unidentified
This morning, a funeral mass will be held for former New York City Congressman Charles Rangel, who was a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
Congressman Wrangel, who died in May, served in Congress for 46 years, the second longest-serving incumbent member of the House.
Former President Bill Clinton, New York Governor Kathy Hochle, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries will give eulogies.
Watch live coverage from St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York at 9:45 a.m. Eastern on C-SPAN 2.
C-SPAN Now, our free mobile video app, or online at c-span.org.
Experience democracy in action with C-SPAN's Voices, where we hear directly from you.
We want to know what are your thoughts on the upcoming military parade in Washington, D.C.
I think it's hopefully a start of a great tradition.
250th anniversary of the founding of the United States Army.
There's probably no organization that deserves to be honored more than our U.S. fighting forces, particularly the Army.
I consider myself pretty anti-military, seeing Army parades in the U.S.
I can't help but think of depictions of Army parades from countries like Nazi Germany, from the Soviet Union.
My thoughts about the military, I think it's great, and we need to honor our veterans and our soldiers.
My thoughts on the Armored Parade is this is just a tremendous waste of money and waste of energy on a man that really doesn't deserve a parade.
My name's Guy, I'm from Florida, and I think it's a wonderful thing.
I mean, we see military parades throughout the country.
However, this being the headquarters for freedom and serving in the military myself, I really think it's a wonderful idea.
It's a waste of taxpayer dollars.
We generally would like to see our taxpayer dollars go towards improving infrastructure and social programs and things like that rather than a parade for the Army and for Trump's birthday.
C-SPAN's Voices, delivering democracy unfiltered.
be part of the conversation.
This show and C-SPAN is one of the few places left in America where you actually have left and right coming together to talk and argue.
And you guys do a great service in that.
I love C-SPAN too.
That's why I'm here today.
Answer questions all day, every day.
Sometimes I get to do fun things like go on C-SPAN.
adam goodman
C-SPAN is, I think, one of the very few places that Americans can still go.
unidentified
C-SPAN has such a distinguished and honorable and important mandate and mission in this country.
I love this show.
This is my favorite show to do of all shows because I actually get to hear what the American people care about.
American people have access to their government in ways that they did not before the cable industry provided C-SPAN access.
That's why I like to come on C-SPAN is because this is one of the last places where people are actually having conversations, even people who disagree.
It shows that you can have a television network that can try to be objective.
Thank C-SPAN for all you do.
It's one of the reasons why this program is so valuable because it does bring people together where dissenting voices are heard, where hard questions are asked, and where people have to answer to them.
It isn't just an idea.
It's a process.
Export Selection