Charlie Kirk’s posthumous claims of Turning Point USA financial mismanagement—including a proposed DOGE department (led by Justin Streif) to audit $6B+ in alleged lost funds—sparked speculation about "double agents" and unreleased footage. Candace Owens debunks the "backshot" theory but highlights leaked Hamptons footage of Tyler Robinson changing clothes with an unknown woman as a potential cover-up, while criticizing BBNet (Netanyahu), Josh Hammer, and Bill Ackman for evasive responses. Kirk’s death, amid unanswered questions and federal inaction until September 15th, suggests deeper institutional failures, leaving history’s narrative under scrutiny despite Owens’ defense of Erica Kirk amid conspiracy theories. [Automatically generated summary]
Now, there are two aspects in that video that we can debunk, and I want to do that.
unidentified
And there's one aspect that we cannot debunk clearly.
I think this is a worldwide investigation, so I want to assist wherever it is that I can.
So welcome back to Candace.
There's a lot of leaking going on right now.
And I've been very clear that everything in my soul has been screaming at me from the very moment that I found out that Charlie got shot, that this story is much bigger.
that there just was something much bigger going on than what has thus far been presented to the public.
You know, all of the wrong people are eulogizing him.
They're lying about small things, which I don't like, because why lie about small things?
Only a guilty conscience of sorts lies about little things.
And there are a few points that we have covered throughout the story that right away jumped out at me as odd.
First and foremost, of course, Bibi Netanyahu overinserting himself, not even just on day one, minute one.
He tweeted before the president of the United States that Charlie had lost his life.
unidentified
That's weird.
That's very weird, and we should not forget how weird that is, especially because when he went on multiple hits doing Fox News and Greta Van Sistern's show, he lied about the contents of a letter that Charlie Kirk had written him back in May.
What I also don't like are the people like Josh Hammer and Seth Dylan, people that I know who are very nasty and work behind the scenes.
I tell you about Bibi Netanyahu calling Charlie Kirk and inviting him to Israel.
unidentified
And Bill Ackman replies with an essay, a college essay, 959 words to be precise, was his response to me speaking about that, where he himself did not actually address my points about the quote-unquote intervention, which is how Charlie described it himself, and my point about BB Net and Yahoo and the offer to take Turning Point to the next level financially.
No one wants to address those points because I was being honest.
unidentified
People thought that Charlie's ideas were trending in the wrong direction.
And by the way, regarding that now infamous weekend, the response videos that were made, which seemed like there was some sort of a PR crisis going on, the response tweets that were fashioned, they were sort of getting funny.
He had, rather than answering me, messaged me to say, I am speaking out about that weekend.
He made a video where he formally addressed the weekend and explained that, yes, Charlie, and he uses the phrase moral blackmail.
Charlie spoke about feeling morally blackmailed, but this was done in more of a workshop setting, essentially like it was a debate club and they were strengthening their debates on the topic of Israel.
We can take a listen to Xavier DeRusso in his own words.
And then people are taking things out of context because there was like a, in the article, the hit piece that came out, it talks about how Charlie raised up his phone and had written on Twitter and he said something like, BB needs to resign or something like that.
And he goes, what would happen if I do this?
There was discourse.
And then there was one woman who sat in the back who said, if you do that, you're indirectly going to empower Hamas.
And then Charlie was like, see, you have to stop saying like that.
He was saying that when you are debating about Israel, you need to stop doing it emotionally.
You need to do it logically and factually.
Otherwise, you lose the debate.
He said it is moral blackmail if you say that somebody's saying that a politician is bad, that you're then empowering a terrorist organization.
It was a fair argument, but it also was a real argument.
And you kind of removed the names that were involved in this conversation.
Natasha Hausdorff was there.
Seth Dylan was there.
And Seth Dillon was the one that was applying pressure to him.
And Seth Dillon and Josh Hammer, Josh Hammer didn't jump on him in that moment, were not happy.
They were not happy with Charlie at the end of this weekend in the Hamdens because, again, they saw which way the wind was traveling in terms of his positions on Bibi Net and Yahoo and Israel.
And they were, in fact, being accusatory.
And again, you don't have to take it in my words or Xavier's words.
I've always had a friendly relationship with Xavier, but we should listen to Charlie's own words, which we have played multiple times of what happened the day after this little weekend retreat, where he vented to Megan Kelly his frustrations with him being wrongly labeled anti-Semitic and how it was actually pushing him away and it wasn't good for Israel.
Then, and that one of the big questions that we discovered or that we asked and something that we had discovered was that this weekend was kept hush-hush, which is extraordinarily unusual for a turning point event.
The reason we didn't post that in the real time was because of safety.
Do you know how many people would have loved to come and slaughter that whole hotel?
Feeling like Justin Bieber, because it's not clocking for me.
I'm sorry.
So first off, you guys never connected to Turning Point USA publicly.
The photos that you posted, if you posted it after the event, I don't think that it's because you were fearful that what, just being a conservative in the Hamptons was going to get you slaughtered, like were there Hamas tunnels under the Hamptons.
This is, I am looking at Marissa Strait right there, right there, a little PR operation to address the points without actually addressing the points and to make it seem like it was nothing.
And that's not the reality.
You know, Marissa has never always been open about the fact that she worked for the IDF intelligence.
And like I said, you could sense there was a PR panic when people started speaking about the weekend.
I told you guys the truth.
That's it.
Okay.
I don't like the fact that Charlie was literally facing financial threats over his speech, the thing that mattered most to him, right?
Every excuse that I have been handed for why they won't release it makes no sense to me.
unidentified
If you are under pressure, if people are starting to look at you funny as an organization, if they're thinking that whether rightfully or wrongfully, if they are suspecting because they see this footage of someone quickly remove the SD cards that you guys had something to do with the assassination of Charlie Kirk and you quite literally have footage that in theory should vindicate yourself, why wouldn't you release it?
Think about that.
Just in your own capacity, if somebody is saying you are guilty of anything, if they're like, Candace, you are absolutely guilty of breaking into my car.
And I'm like, I have a camera right here that shows that I did not break into your car.
Would it make sense if I was like, but I'm not going to release that?
I'm not going to release that because it's not right.
It's not right for me to release.
Like, what?
It makes no sense.
I don't understand why they would not release this.
And I was being genuine when I said he's under a lot of pressure.
There's no question.
He's the spokesperson for Turning Point USA, and he's grieving somebody that he knows and who was a very close, if not one of his best friends.
He saw every day doing the Charlie Kirk show.
And he's still got to deal with the same donors that Charlie was dealing with.
I mean, it's a lot going on, you know.
And until we have all the facts in front of us, until we actually see the footage, I think we should be careful in just thinking that everybody is guilty of something.
I want you guys to also, though, be conscious of the lies that we are being told by the federal government because that feels extremely guilty to me.
We haven't received any updates whatsoever on the raid that took place of Lance's house, where Tyler Robinson was living at the time of this crime.
No update whatsoever on Lance.
You know, he just completely fell to the wayside.
So forget it.
Forget asking any questions about Lance.
And my instinct has always been that the feds injected themselves immediately into this case because they were staging a cover-up.
Some of it felt a little cheap and fake and gay, but for me, this is real.
unidentified
So I had been hunting down all the videos, all of the footage, and wanted to go back to ground zero, as we did yesterday, of the initial videos that went viral on social media and on X on the day that Charlie was assassinated.
And it occurred to me that I forgot about one video, actually, the only video that exists of the shooter sprinting across the rooftop a mere seconds after the shot was fired.
Now, you probably recall that video in the back of your mind.
You remember that video that was going viral of him seen running across the roof?
unidentified
Well, I'm about to show it to you in a much clearer quality than you have ever seen it, a higher quality than you have ever seen that video.
Remember, before I show it to you, just to tee this up, it is just a couple of seconds after the sound of a shot rang out.
Now, let me tell you how I tracked down this footage.
It took me all of two hours to track down this footage to get the name of the person who had filmed the footage.
And to from there, after messaging someone on Twitter, they said, I got the footage from this person.
This is the person that shot it.
And he's willing to speak to you.
I get in touch with this individual.
Okay.
Very quickly.
It was all transpired in a couple of hours.
And you will never guess what it is that he told me.
He told me that neither the feds nor the local police had ever reached out to him.
Never.
I'm sorry.
What?
You have one of two people who have a recording of the shooter at all, right?
At all.
And the feds were simply not interested as they were executing this manhunt of reaching out to the individual who had footage of him running across the roof.
Somebody explained to me: make it make sense for me.
Maybe in the fog and the chaos, sure.
unidentified
But at no point did they go, hey, hmm, I see this really grainy image that's gone viral on Twitter.
Maybe I should reach out to the person that made it go viral and see if I can track down that person so I can get clear data, meaning the metadata that exists, which will tell you the exact second that the person was running to make sure it lines up with my federal timeline that I must be creating.
If little old Candace is doing it, then I'm sure the feds at the top are definitely creating a second-by-second timeline just like I am.
Nobody, and they said, you know, we were overwhelmed on that day one, which makes sense.
Everybody contacting, calling, someone says, I have this.
So it makes sense that he would be on the offense and getting them the footage.
But the feds never reached out to him until the 15th.
After Governor Cox said the investigation was over and they had the guy, the feds reached out to him and said, hey, you're the one who shot that footage.
Now, right away, you might ask, why is that happening?
unidentified
Well, I can tell you in my experience, political organizations sometimes don't recognize that they are not like corporate organizations.
And what I mean by that is not whether or not the organization is a corporate, but rather sometimes they get the wrong idea that they can sort of do things that people can do on Wall Street, right?
They feel that the organization is now being motivated just by money and that this company's priorities have somewhat shifted and that really how people on the outside that are looking in are going, what's going on here?
unidentified
Why are people not more rattled by the lies that are being told?
Actually, I think if Charlie were here, he'd be talking about the weird things that were being told about this story, right?
Ironically.
And so many people have reached out and they spoke about the finances at Turning Point USA.
And, you know, I'm not exactly a forensic accountant, but I know that other people, other journalists, got really interested in this angle who were similarly receiving leaks and have pushed this off to forensic accountants.
And some of the stuff is getting very interesting.
But I did want to show you guys this because I think this proves what we have been hearing.
It's at least a starting point, an insider who said that they were there and present when Charlie had expressed some concerns about where the money was going.
And leading up to that moment, Charlie had by and large completely removed himself outside of the organ of fundraising, which is to say that it wasn't something that he necessarily had his finger on.
Of course, he always would show up for top donor meetings.
He is the face of the company.
But in terms of the accounting specifics, he trusted his lieutenants.
Of course, something that big, you know, you're clearing $100 million a year.
You got to have lieutenants and you have to trust those lieutenants.
And of course, sometimes those leaders don't like one another.
He felt that, again, according to sources, that the company was burning through cash too quickly.
unidentified
And Charlie set about finding out why and how this was happening.
So on September 2nd, which is, of course, just one week before he lost his life, Charlie surprised the company by announcing that he was putting together a Doge department.
Yes, a department of government efficiency, like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, had set out to do.
Justin has led Turning Point's fundraising division and, in more recent years, has been involved in some organizational operations, filling the COO role in many ways, but now officially taking on the title and expanded responsibilities.
unidentified
Now, we're going to jump to that last big paragraph.
He writes: In this role, I have empowered Justin, among other priorities, to engage in an organizational-wide Doge effort.
Justin will be assembling a small team to assist in this effort, which is focused on Turning Point USA, one, becoming more efficient, two, becoming more cost-effective, three, unifying organizational success around company-wide metrics and goals, and four, reshaping company culture.
I expect many positive changes to come from this forthcoming initiative and Justin's expanded role.
unidentified
Please join me in congratulating Justin on this new role with the organization.
So, I felt that with all of the rumors that I'm hearing, to see that Charlie was essentially putting together a small team to begin looking at money and ways to be more quote-unquote efficient, it's looking like that's that's relevant, that all of these tips that we are receiving from insiders is accurate.
And what we're understanding is that there were a lot of contractors and people essentially who were taking money both ways, who were bringing in money and cutting deals, said simply the money was looking funny.
Okay.
And Charlie set out to determine why, which means that others should maybe set out to determine why.
Is this department still going?
And like I said to you, others are setting out to determine why.
There are journalists, forensic accountants that have been hired.
And what I have been shown, the preliminary findings are quite astonishing.
Okay.
And I will say this, my sources at Turning Point said something that I found to be crucial, interesting.
They said that Charlie wasn't just concerned about where the money was going, but also where the money was coming from.
Either speaking about companies that were kind of flooding the zone with money so they could have more influence, but they had questions about those companies.
unidentified
It sounds like there were people who were effectively double agents making money on commissions on both sides of a contract.
I've seen a lot and I'm going to allow the reports to come out next week that people who have really seized upon that and are looking at things.
And I think a lot's going to be revealed, like I said, as it should.
This is the angle he is showing the shot coming from, showing where Charlie was sitting and the angle of the shot, which will correspond with this video here, which unfortunately we will blur out Charlie's face, but we will show what is necessary to prove that this was an entry and exit wound.
So you'll see him circle the highlighted area right there.
And you'll see the exit wound corresponding after, a split second after, as it would from an entry and exit wound.
So in this footage, you can clearly see that Charlie is shot from his back right, and there is blood splatter coming out of the entry wound.
unidentified
Okay.
So what I can immediately help with, because I have so much footage and clearer footage of that, is that's actually not blood splatter.
And I was very surprised by this.
It's his necklace.
That is his necklace.
And it was one of the things that struck me as odd.
And I saw the back footage and then I have clear footage from the front.
And the necklace goes first.
And if I'm looking at it, it looks like it breaks from here and then it comes up and it whips up.
That is Charlie's necklace chain.
So I hope that that sort of helps focus that.
And I don't know if that helps change your opinion at all, but I wanted to add that.
The second thing is I wanted to show you a photo, a different angle of where that flash that he is looking at came from.
Because the thing that I don't understand is that particular window doesn't open.
So if it, if you're saying it's inside and I might be wrong, so you can see, and I hope I have this right.
If I'm wrong, please let me know and I will adjust it immediately.
But that window is from that zone, which they call like the flag hall, which is where that person actually shot the footage.
He's on the other side of it, where we saw the person running across the roof.
That's basically above the underpass.
And so you can see from this angle that those windows, I don't know if we have a more front forward picture of that skylight.
If we don't, it's okay.
But from everything that I could see, those windows don't open.
So if it's coming from inside, if that's where you're saying and I had that location correctly, again, I'm happy to update this if I'm wrong, then we should see broken glass.
So let me know if I'm right about that.
I will say there was another piece, and this part I have not been able to debunk, but I am sending someone there to get me similar footage, which is when you discuss a suspicious looking bush.
So I will let you, I will let Range Daybro present that theory.
And this correlates with human head and hair and a rifle in the exact kind of crucifix shape of an AR-15 with an optic on it mounted up.
So, what I can say, and I'm looking at my minute-to-minute text messages because I sent somebody there on the ground to get me pictures of that bush today.
And I agree with you in the smaller, in the photos that I'm looking at today, the bush, you can kind of see through it.
And in the image that you have, granted, it is grainy, it doesn't seem like you can see through it.
So, I am interested in that and I am prodding that narrative.
And I will let you know what I come up with, anyways.
Again, the point of me doing that was just to help further direct your theories.
Everybody is coming out with ideas, and I think that's great.
Until the feds answer our questions, until we see more footage of what took place that day, all of us need to stay on top of it because we all sense that something is very wrong and we are not getting the truth.
One more thing that I'd like to share with you guys: you will recall yesterday during the comment section, we got a tip, a young woman that said that that doorbell footage was intentionally presented to the public only partially, and that the reality is that there was more footage, which showed the person that they allege is Tyler Robinson walking with a woman who they don't know who that is, and that he changes clothes.
So, I'm not sure if there was more footage on the side of the house.
There's another angle, but there is allegedly footage of Tyler changing clothes, and he is with an unidentified woman, a woman.
unidentified
What I will say is, I have established connection with that individual, and it's a solid lead, and it's only going to get more interesting in terms of who is involved in that cover-up locally, like a Utah person involved in that cover-up, which is another piece of this puzzle that I find to be fascinating.
I will have more for you guys next week as we continue this.
unidentified
I always want to make sure that we give people an opportunity to respond and to answer what it is that we are putting out there and making sure that our reports are accurate.
And I will have more for you on that next week.
I do also want to address people who are inundating me speaking about Erica Kirk.
And I think the reason why this was catalyzed was because a fundraising email and text messages went out, and people found it to be distasteful and like fundraising off of his death.
unidentified
Okay, first and foremost, the reason why I said, and I meant it genuinely, was to pray for Erica a couple of days ago.
And I said she is stepping into a role, a CEO and the chairman of a company, a company that got bigger than Charlie by everything that I am understanding.
And just having been there, I saw it happening.
And a company that she's going to have to learn in four seconds how this whole thing is.
It is a machine.
Okay.
Those emails that you saw are technically, that was not written by Erica Kirk.
And of course, I'm not in their marriage, but I know that Charlie was very happy with Erica.
unidentified
And I know that Erica was a reason.
She was pushing Charlie, as women do, to really think through his ideas and think through what it was that he believed in one way or the other.
And by and large, I'm not going to sit here and pretend that I had this relationship that I had with Charlie that I had with Erica, of course, because neither he or I were married when we were hitting the road together, but she made him happy.
And I just want you guys to know that.
And so when you're putting stuff out there, just imagine that you're in her shoes.
And to be thrown into fame, I think, is very difficult when you're not pursuing it yourself.
unidentified
And to be thrown in such a horrific way, it just can't be fun.
So I'm just reminding us all to just have a little bit of grace is all.
Anyways, you guys, before I get into more of your comments, I'm going to tell you about Just Thrive because the biggest health secret that is not talked about is that everything starts in your gut.
Every day, your gut is fighting a silent war against processed food, work stress, toxins that are in the air that we breathe.
You guys know that when your gut is in trouble, the whole body feels it.
Most probiotics do not actually work because 99% of the traditional brands just die in your stomach acid before they even reach your gut.
unidentified
And that's what makes Just Thrive's spore-based probiotic completely different.
Just Thrive is the only probiotic that is clinically proven to arrive 100% alive in your gut.
It does something that no other probiotic can.
It turns your gut into an antioxidant factory, creating protective compounds exactly where you need the most, which means better digestion, healthy immunity, more energy, and easy weight management.
You can take Just Thrive probiotic in the form of a capsule or a berry-flavored gummy from their award-winning probiotic to their full line of gut, immune, and brain health supplements.
Just Thrive has been fighting to make Americans healthy again with science-backed solutions that you can trust.
To join the gut health revolution and take control of your health today, visit justthrivehealth.com and you'll save 20% if you use my promo code, which is Candice, at checkout.
You'll see the difference for yourself, or you will get a full product refund without any questions asked.
So you can take control today with Just Thrive.
Again, visit justthrivehealth.com and use promo code Candice at checkout.
All right, you guys, what is on your mind?
Let me get to your comments, what you guys are thinking about.
Kelly Martini writes, Candice, you are the epitome of truth.
You know, I'm the epitome of truth, would be Jesus Christ, but I will say that following truth is an ugly business.
Because everybody's lying and we're not going to allow it.
How about that?
unidentified
How about we're just not going to allow everyone to lie?
Curated Journey writes, Thank you, Candace, for the work that you have put into telling us the truth.
How do you deal with all these people that are trying to lie about the friendship that you have with Charlie and do everything that they can to turn the people against you through the media?
God bless you.
I just know that it's a ticking time bomb, right?
Before they are all exposed.
And I think a financial audit is interesting.
I think there were a lot of pastors that were around Charlie who weren't exactly honest about whether or not they were financially motivated to say some certain things.
I obviously didn't watch what everybody else was saying about Charlie after his assassination because I was absolutely wrecked.
It was a very tough week for me.
And I felt I didn't even feel motivated to get out of bed.
And but Taylor Lorenz said, she's like, why do I feel like Candice is the only one?
I think she said this on X.
I don't know if we have that tweet and ask you to pull it, but like she did say, why do I feel like Candice is the only one that actually cared about Charlie?
And she's the only tribute because I mean, like, that's the reality of politics.
It's gross.
It's disgusting.
It's a disgusting business.
And Charlie had a better stomach for it than I did.
That's the reality.
Yeah.
She wrote, Taylor Lorenz, it's wild that Candace is the only right-wing figure that I've seen posting in a way where she seems genuinely devastated to lose Charlie as a friend.
And it's because you can't fake it.
And a lot of people are faking it right now.
And it's difficult for me to process, which I have not, that he is actually gone.
Like that doesn't feel real to me yet, but I know I will get to that stage eventually.
James Moran writes, greetings from across the pond in Ireland, Candace, and keep up the great work.
God bless.
Thank you, James.
Renee writes, Have you covered the Amazon listing from September 9th for a book about Charlie with all the details, which were pretty accurate, of what happened on the 10th?
I have a picture of a screenshot supposedly verified.
Yeah, I think Amazon came out and said that it was a technical error because I guess you can adjust the dates.
unidentified
To be honest with you, I didn't look into it because there's a thousand ways that you could run with this.
And I wanted to keep the pressure on the feds and I wanted to keep the pressure on getting as much information as I could about what took place on that day.
But I know there are people that have made a lot of videos about that.
And so maybe I'll watch one of those.
Brie Barrera writes, so glad that I caught you live today.
I work nights, so I never wake up early enough, but I wanted to let you know that I found you two years ago through Charlie Kirk and you changed my life.
And he was like one of the only two people in politics that I can even stand because he was a real stray shooter with me.
unidentified
Thistle writes, I wanted to ask your thoughts about the fact that quote unquote notes on bullets have been everywhere while our representatives are signing the bombs they drop on innocent people.
Just a thought, thank you.
Yeah, it does, it does seem to bear their signature.
Like Nikki Haley signing bombs, people going over there signed bombs that are going to be dropped and killing children.
And so yeah, it's been a weird new thing that everyone's doing, which is strange and feels very forced and fake to me.
Totally agree.
Dave Matthews writes, what would you do if there was another video footage of someone else on the rooftop?
If you're suggesting that you have the footage, please send it.
You can send it to us, tips at cannisowens.com.
We are inundated, guys.
So please, if you can, just if you're sending us tips, hopefully it's related to this investigation, tips like, have you seen this video or YouTube, whatever, that's best reserved for like commenting on our Instagram and our social media pages.
We'll see it there.
The tips line, we want to keep for actual tips related to this investigation.
Not because I'm not so grateful that you guys are writing all these emails, but our tips inbox is getting so full that it's taken us a lot of time to go through it.
So yeah, I'm just trying to figure out how to filter so we know where to look for, hey, have you seen this video versus, hey, we have an actual tip related to this investigation.
unidentified
Ben Otten writes, your interview with Charlie Kirk on PragerU showed up on my YouTube algorithm.
It's great to watch it again.
Also, does anyone else find etchings on the bullet casings conveniently found in all of the occurrences of violent crimes lately quite suspicious?
Indeed, Ben, indeed.
You and Thistle both agree that that is very suspect.
Like I said, it's starting to feel like a government signature a little bit, right?
Miranda New writes, the anger and hate towards Erica is insane.
She's a beacon of light in this dark world, as are you, Candace.
I assume Erica also thinks all of this is weird too, or she would have stopped you by now.
All love.
That is correct.
Erica has my number.
Erica actually recently started following me.
It was another thing that they were like, Candace doesn't even follow Charlie.
Yeah, because I unfollowed everyone, but I announced my book, Blackout.
And then I didn't start refollowing people on all my social media pages.
You will realize I'm like the only person you know that follows very few people because I realized that I was engaging in social media in a way where I was hearing everybody else's ideas as opposed to sharing my own.
And so it's just like the ridiculous angles that they've taken.
If Erica was like, don't say anything, or if she lied about anything publicly, if she was like, no, Charlie like wasn't attending mass, like I would be like, okay, this is a little weird.
And people that are not used to constantly being on stage and presenting like Charlie was like, he had the it factor, you know, Charlie get up there and the room was alive.
unidentified
And now we're judging the people that he loved in his life who don't don't do that for a living.
And I just really just feels to me like it's unfair.
So I wanted to express that and just say that.
And yeah, anyways, next week, we will not be on air tomorrow because last week was a rare Friday and I like to have my Fridays off.
Again, if you have something pertaining to the investigation, you were there.
unidentified
You're a police officer.
You're a federal, you're in the government, you're Fed, and you are watching this and you know that what I'm saying is true, please email us tips at candaceowens.com.
If you guys would like to support us in any capacity, always can head to candiceowens.com, join the book club, learn about vaccines if you're a parent, or buy yourself some CIA merch so that we can be arrested by Laura Loomer and her tweets be reported by Laura Loomer.
We Will Not Rewrite History00:00:31
unidentified
Beyond that, you guys, thank you so much.
Thank you guys for just being supportive in general.
You really have helped me get through the past two weeks and we will not allow the real legacy of Charlie Kirk to die, nor will we allow them to rewrite history, nor will we allow them to rewrite present, which is this investigation.