All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2025 - Candace Owens
45:30
BREAKING NEWS: I Just Got Subpoenaed By Blake Lively And Ryan Reynolds | Candace Ep 209
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, you guys, happy Tuesday.
And let me just say, I never understood what people meant when they referred to Christmas in July until this exact moment.
Because after effectively pleading, I mean, I did, I pleaded, I begged, I demanded that I be allowed to partake in this Justin Baldoni lawsuit.
And finally, at long last, Ryan and Blake Lively have delivered.
Okay, I found out from TMZ literally two hours ago that I have been subpoena.
I'm not crying.
You're crying.
Also, I was surrounded by 20 feminists for a debate.
You may have caught that with Jubilee, and it went exactly how you might have expected.
Again, I am not crying.
You are crying.
So welcome back to Candace.
I am, in a word, elated.
I am, in another word, honored.
I feel as though this, I don't know, do you feel like we should be celebrating right now?
It feels kind of like a graduation ceremony of sorts for me and all of my podcast listeners.
So we should just bring in the appropriate music right now.
And this is how it feels as we go on.
We remember all the times we had together.
It's beautiful.
It's reflective.
We have had many times together going through this lawsuit.
Many nights I spent up marking the lawsuit up with my pen, making little notations, stickies, post-its, trying to comprehend everything that was happening, calling Noah, having him tell me, okay, my lawyer, oh, you're not involved in this lawsuit.
Haha, jokes on you, Noah.
Jokes on you, because now you've got to read my subpoena and figure out what happens next.
I mean, this is crazy times, you guys.
It's like we're living in a simulation.
And emphasis on the crazy because girl, what?
Literally, Blake, what are you talking about?
Foremost, let's just get into how I found out about this subpoena because I want you guys to really comprehend, comprehend like fully how fake and gay everything in Hollywood is.
And this is a perfect opportunity to show you, to really reveal to you that journalists are not the fourth estate.
Okay.
They're not the fourth estate, fourth estate that's trying to get the truth out to you.
That's what we learned in school.
They're the fourth estate.
They protect us against the corruption.
No, they are the corruption.
They actually are the ones that are all bought and paid for.
And they've got teams and PR agents.
So anyways, a couple of hours ago, about like one o'clock or so, I'm going to show you the exact time.
We get an email.
And I want you to take a look at the time that TMZ sent this email and how quickly my PR person, Mitchell, responded to this email.
Okay.
Now, mind you, Mitchell is in London.
So just adjust this timeframe for wherever you're at.
But let's pull this up.
It was 1.11 my time.
So we're talking about like 2.11 p.m. Eastern for reference.
So he gets this email at 2.11 p.m.
Eastern.
We're looking at, again, Mitchell's phone, so that's why it's in London time.
And Ryan Parker, who's a senior producer for TMZ, writes, hi, Mitchell, reaching out to see if Ms. Owens has any comment on being subpoenaed in the lively Baldoni case.
Thank you for your time.
Mitchell wrote back within 10 minutes and wrote to him, hi, Ryan.
Thank you.
Can you send a copy of the subpoena to us?
Candace has not been served.
We cannot comment if we have not seen what she will be served.
Like, obviously, somebody gave this.
And by somebody, I mean clearly this is a Leslie Sloan Blake lively Ryan Reynolds PR strategy.
I've been telling you for a long time, just by reading how TMZ is reporting on this, that they are very team Blake.
Like they're, it's very clear that the contacts are stronger for this team at TMZ.
So they hit up TMZ, presumably showed them this subpoena, and then had them email me for a comment, knowing fully well, as they would know, because they're the ones serving it to me, that I had not received it.
So I was a total deer in headlights.
Okay.
That was 10 minutes after.
So then Mitchell messages me and I'm like, he, I said, let's just issue a statement saying just that, that I haven't received the subpoena.
Obviously, how else could I comment?
And it will really show how absurd it is that she's feeding it to the press.
So we went back to them with a statement.
If you want to pull that up, Skylar, a full statement at 7.29 p.m.
I write, given the fact that I have not received any subpoena yet, I appreciate Blake's team leaking this to TMZ to alert me to it.
And of course, I have not the slightest idea what I am being subpoenaed for, as I knew none of these parties when their respective lawsuits were filed.
But stay tuned and I'll let audiences know on my podcast.
That was entire 18 minutes that had elapsed.
But guess what, guys?
It was too late.
It was too late.
It was too late because Ryan over at TMZ, who had already read the subpoena, somehow managed to write an entire article in just six minutes.
Okay.
Because remember, he emailed us at 2.11 p.m.
Eastern.
And this is now adjusted for Los Angeles, which is where TMZ is based.
So from 2.11, which is when we received the email, TMZ then published the article at 2.17.
Okay.
Six minutes.
They gave us six minutes before they published the article with my face because this is not a journalistic endeavor.
This is meant to be a hit.
It's supposed to make us look bad.
It's supposed to make audiences who read it go, oh my gosh, oh my gosh, there must be something there.
Candice must have been a part of this alleged smear campaign against Blake Lively.
And I read because I was interested in what was in this subpoena.
So I'm reading, I am me, reading about my life live because I haven't received anything.
And TMZ somehow has got it in their possession or has received word about what exactly is in it.
So I will tell you what TMZ says, because as of right now, I still cannot tell you anything because no process server has arrived at our door.
So they went with this headline.
It says that Perez Hilton and me were subpoenaed.
And then the dot, dot, dot, working with Baldoni?
Is it true?
Are they actually related?
Is it really her cousin?
I'm going to find out because I'm a totally legit journalist doing some journalism.
Okay.
The article reads, a source with direct knowledge tells TMZ that Perez Hilton, Candace Owens, and Andy Senior have all been subpoenaed to turn over any and all communications with Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer parties.
The subpoenas may be connected to the judge's order earlier this month, allowing Blake to take discovery in order to uncover the alleged lengths, if any, that Baldoni's side may have gone to in working with notable anti-Blake content creators as part of the alleged smear campaign.
Hilton, Owens, and Senor have all used their sizable digital platforms to discuss case developments, and the trio's commentary has largely hated on Blake's claims while propping up Baldoni's side and his $400 million countersuit.
That is, until it was dismissed.
That's factually untrue.
It was not dismissed, but fine.
We're TMZ and we're doing PR for her.
Then they go on to say, in fact, it was popular YouTuber Senior via his channel, Popcorned Planet, who claimed to have the exclusive featuring Baldoni lawyer Brian Friedman's statement as to why the Wayfarer parties chose to forego amending their dismissed lawsuit.
And that says, as you know, Blake scored a big win earlier this month when a judge tossed out the claims that Baldoni made against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and the New York Times in the massive monetary lawsuit.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
This is all relating to the 2024 film and ended with us.
So, and then they end it, which is amazing, pretty rich.
We've reached out to the subpoena to trio and two reps for Blake and Justin for comment.
So far, no word back.
Six minutes.
So far, no word back.
We gave them six minutes and they can't, they haven't replied.
So we're just going to publish this piece, which we already have written and prepared, obviously, because we're an effective hit squad.
And that's exactly what the New York Times did to Justin Baldoni.
They don't want you to be able to respond with any facts because they're not interested in facts.
This is like a psychological game that they're playing with the masses.
Okay.
So first and foremost, right off the bat, you should know what they're saying is stupid.
They're putting in this piece, Popcorned Planet and Candace have been covering this lawsuit and they have not been favorable to Blake Lively.
Okay, so what does that have to do?
That doesn't mean anything.
We're reading the lawsuit.
We have determined that your client is lying.
How could us covering the lawsuit that has already been filed?
So the lawsuit got filed, which means that unless you have evidence that we coordinated before this lawsuit was filed, we have nothing to do with your lawsuit.
It's our right to cover pop culture, to cover whatever it is that we want as reporters.
So I'm going, what are they doing here?
We have to imagine right now what they could possibly be looking for in this subpoena.
And if we're imagining, then obviously the only conclusion that we can come to, the only thing that makes sense is that Blake and Ryan are still totally deluded.
Like they have committed to this.
It is now a faith.
Okay.
They are certain that when this movie came out and people began reporting on her negatively, that it was part of a coordinated inside smear campaign that involved Candace Owens.
Now, let's just pause there and remember where Candace Owens was last year.
March, I get fired.
I did getting fired bigger and better than anybody in the history of getting fired.
I mean, it was so viral.
It was so crazy.
I had to pick up the pieces of my life.
I was not even on air.
Don't forget, all of this happened for her.
She's claiming all this happened.
This inside smear campaign.
Let's say, let's give it from, let's give her all of 2024.
I didn't cover her at all while I was at the Daily Wire.
So for the first three months, I'm out.
And then I was off air from March until June.
So for those three months, I'm out, right?
I'm fighting for my life.
I'm getting smeared left and right.
I'm getting called Adolf Hitler.
They're saying that I hate Jewish people.
And so at that moment, she's alleging that when I was bringing my show back, at the same time that I'm being accused of being anti-Semitic, I'm also partnering with the Jewish Justin Baldoni and Steve Sarowitz and it's deciding to accept money from them to report on whatever it is they want me to report.
So I actually said to Skylar, our producer, I said, did we even cover Blake Lively last year?
I actually have no recollection.
We were deep, very deep in the Kamala Chronicles last year.
I don't even think we've covered Blake Lively.
He's like, no, we didn't cover Blake Lively.
He goes through all the episodes and he finds one, one solitary episode for all of 2024 that I spoke about Blake Lively.
And it is from August 20th, 2024, when her interview with that journalist, Kirsten Fla, was going viral.
We didn't know why it was going viral, but it was going viral.
And so we covered it because I'm constantly speaking about how much I don't like feminism.
And I thought it was a perfect example of like the women that say that they are feminists and that they love women actually treat other women like crap.
And Blake Lively is known to say, I'm a feminist.
She's using that as an argument in this lawsuit.
And she tweeted, she treated this journalist like absolute crap.
I'll show you the clip that we covered with the rest of the world.
Take a listen.
First of all, congrats on your little bump.
Congrats on your little bump.
What about my bump?
You've got two nice ones.
They are kind of bumps, aren't they?
No, not bumps.
The lovely lady lumps.
Check it out.
Thank you.
Thank you.
You like the movie?
Are you a Woody Allen fan?
I love most of his movies, and this one was so like visually amazing.
Yeah, it's gorgeous.
Feminists are mean.
It's just something I've noticed.
These modern feminists are mean to other women.
So I covered it, what, five minutes of all of 2024?
And she thinks that I was part of some inside baseball smear campaign against her.
I mean, this is wacky.
This is totally wacky.
This is like unhinged.
Okay.
So I actually, before I even call Noah, I'm just going, why don't I just do this live?
Why don't I just subpoena myself?
Like I have nothing to hide here.
So I'm going to, I was like, let me go through my phone and see.
And I'm going to show you guys the first time I've ever even texted Blake Lively, like the actual name Blake Lively in my phone.
Hold on, I got to type this up.
Hopefully nothing comes up.
This is, by the way, I just want to say if you're watching this home, this is not advisable.
Like, and Noah is going to be like, are you out of your mind?
Here we go.
Here we go.
Blake Lively.
Let's get see all messages.
What do we have?
When is the first time I ever texted the name of Blake Lively?
Oh, this is photos.
I want to see all the messages.
Okay, so here it is.
I'm showing you guys my phone.
Okay, let's just, can you get closer to that?
Okay.
This is my phone.
This is the first time I've ever looked at where you can see I'm at the bottom here.
Okay, I'm at the bottom.
And that what you're seeing right there, we can make bigger.
Mark's running out right now, so we can get, we're just going to do a live subpoena of my messages.
Okay, kind of a little blurry here, Mark.
Okay, there we go.
You see that first line here?
That is the date on that is January 3rd, 2019.
I mentioned Blake lively, and I have two eye heart faces.
Like I'm making like love eyes at her.
That doesn't sound like a smear campaign from 2019.
And then behind that, the first time that I use her name is Skylar messaging me on August 20, 2024.
So let's read both of those messages live, okay?
Let's go ahead, Skylar.
Let's pull up what I was saying because I actually was surprised.
I'm surprised by this.
What was I saying nice about her back in 2019?
Yeah, boo you.
I was actually saying something nice about you, Skylar.
Can you pull up the text message that I just sent to you?
Mark's going to pull it up.
Sorry.
We're making Mark run back and forth to do a live subpoena.
My poor team.
Honestly, we have way too much fun.
Okay, me and this woman, Christy, are sharing photos of rings.
And I write, ha ha ha.
Oh my God, amazing.
Looking at these now.
And then I say, Blake Lively's with the heart eyes.
And she writes back, Christy, this is a pink diamond and it's flawless.
Oh my God, lock me up, Judge Lehman.
Lock me up.
I said something nice about Blake Lively in 2019.
It's a nice ring.
I think it ring's nice.
Very pretty.
Okay.
The next message comes in.
I kid you not.
So I have not spoken about Blake Lively from 2019 until August 20th, 2024.
And here is the message chain between me and Skylar, my producer.
This is how it happened, Blake.
Lean in.
Get your lawyers in.
You are unlocking this smear campaign, girlfriend.
You got this.
Here we go.
You can use this.
No one's going to be like, yes, you are.
He's going to be somebody.
Anyways, I write, because guess what?
You're going to not believe this.
I come up with my own ideas for the show.
I say, monologue will be on DNC.
Then I write, schmooly will be a story.
And then Skylar responds to the DNC thing and says, so many cringe moments because it was a little cringe.
Sorry for my Democrats that watch the show.
And then I say, as just an afterthought, we should cover Blake Lively as well.
Very viral at the moment.
And then he, then that's it.
And then I just say, yeah, let's do top three or five cringe.
And we ended up doing an episode of like the top, I think, five cringe moments from the DNC because they were, it was just weird.
It was, I mean, all of these conventions are getting a little weird.
And then Skylar writes back the drama to do with the movie.
I think he meant to do a question mark.
And then you can see he sends me the link to share.
There you have it.
You didn't even have to spend money on a subpoena.
And I am just so offended more than anything that someone would think that I would accept payment to say something that I don't believe in or that I would accept payment to say things without telling my followers that.
And I'm also confused, completely confused about how I can be accused in the same year of working for Russia, working for Qatar.
What was that?
Two weeks ago, I was working for Qatar.
Now they've removed it and they say that I'm working for Iran.
And now we get to this week and they say that I'm working for, what was the guy who was involved, Jared in her lawsuit, some guy of Jared, I'm forgetting his last name, forgive me, who they said were coordinating this campaign on like Reddit and between podcasters.
It might just be the case, okay, that I am beholden to no one, that I just say exactly what I am thinking at any moment of the day.
And sometimes, actually, many times it gets people very upset.
In fact, the argument that's typically made in the press is that I can't be controlled.
That's the problem with me is that I don't dance for money.
And I truly looked at this lawsuit when it all came out in January.
Okay.
And I just thought that you were a bad person.
Truly, that was that from the bottom of my heart.
I think you and Ryan are bad people.
There is nobody involved.
Nobody has ever been involved in making me come to that conclusion.
And then I looked at, as I was going with the insider information, even the insider information, the first time I even published about this was on January 23rd.
And the person that gave me the insider scoop, I did a whole, like a bunch of stories on Instagram saying, like, I am hearing that the person driving this is Ryan.
Not only was this person not a party of a lawsuit, they weren't even one degree removed from a party to this lawsuit.
So that kind of fell into my hands quite accidentally.
And then I just was interested in everything and I opened up the tips line, which is what reporters do.
And I said, if you know anything about Ryan or Blake or you work with them, send me information to tips at candaceowens.com.
And, you know, from that point on, I'm just a journalist and I protect my sources.
And that's what I've done.
So your move, Blake.
I just live subpoenaed.
No one's ever done that in the history of the world.
I just live subpoenaed myself.
Those are the messages.
We don't have to fight that.
I'll give you those two messages.
That's it.
You have not been a common discussion between 2019, 2024.
Unfortunately.
Unfortunately.
We're going to get to more wacky feminists because that seems to be the theme today.
We're going to talk about now my sitting down with the women over at Jubilee.
You may have seen that I was surrounded by 20 feminists.
I thought this was a good idea that nine months pregnant to go and have a nice conversation with feminists.
And you know what?
The conversation actually was not that nice as to be expected.
But there's always something to learn from feminists.
There's something to learn from Blake Liley and there's going to be something to learn from these women.
First, I'm going to tell you about some of our sponsors.
There's Monorail, because why are we still investing all of our hard-earned money into companies that hate everything that we stand for?
We shouldn't do that.
Companies that mock our faith, undermine our families, and trample on the freedoms that this country was built on.
That's why I'm so excited to tell you guys about Monorail.
That's America's investment app.
This is not just another Wall Street tool.
Monorail was built by Americans and for Americans.
It's time to let our values guide us on how we invest and save for retirement.
With Monorail's Patriot portfolio, you can move your dollars out of the hands of globalist corporations and into companies that actually support what you believe in.
So whether you are new to investing or you've been in the game for years, Monorail helps you invest like a pro.
And yes, they offer IRAs, stock trading, automatic savings, even U.S.-based customer service support.
So if you are a conscientious investor, someone who puts their money where their morals are, this is the app for you.
Open an account today and let their expert team build a portfolio that you can actually be proud of.
Download the Monorail app right now.
It's available on the App Store and Google Play or visit monorail.com to learn more.
Invest with conviction, not compromise.
That's monorail.com.
Also reminding you guys about PDS debt, because the system isn't broken.
It's actually rigged.
And if you're buried in debt, that's exactly how they want it.
Big banks profit when you are desperate.
Creditors win when you lose, but you don't have to play their game.
PDS debt helps you take back control.
They've helped hundreds of thousands break free from credit cards, loans, and high interest traps.
It's your money.
It's your future.
So it's time to fight for both.
PDS Debt goes beyond the numbers to understand your unique financial situation and craft a personalized plan that's designed just for you.
There is no minimum credit score required.
They're here to help you save money, pay off your debt faster, and start putting money back where it belongs in your pocket.
PDS Debt is rated A plus by the Better Business Bureau, boasts thousands of five-star reviews on Google, and it holds a five-star rating on TrustPilot.
Why?
Because PDS has helped hundreds of thousands of people get out of debt.
You are just 30 seconds away from being debt-free.
So get your free assessment and find the best option for you right now at pdsdebt.com slash candace.
Again, that's pdsdebt.com slash Candace.
Okay, let's get to some more unhinged feminists.
Because yesterday, by the way, we had a very big episode and I asked some very important questions, I would say.
And one of those important questions was, are we the muggles?
Do you know what I mean?
To use a fantastical analogy, it's kind of been this random thought that I've been harboring ever since I read that book I was telling you guys about yesterday by David Bakan, which was an extremely well-researched book.
And he posits and eventually proves that Sigmund Freud's truest contribution was his ability to turn his religion as somebody who was a Kabbalist into a science, right?
Think about that.
You have a religion and you are able to transform it into a science.
Because of course, let me just play with you here to give you an example.
If I came to you and I said, hey, hey guys, I'm a Christian and I want you to have five children or more because the Bible says to be fruitful and multiply.
You might just like, oh, okay, what?
And you would recoil.
But if I say, hey, the science is in.
Studies show that women who have more than four children will live to be 150 years old and their skin will never wrinkle.
Suddenly, a bunch of women are going to go, well, it's the science.
Okay.
So in short, Sigmund Freud is the earliest iteration of the trust the science movement because it's science, right?
It's not a religious science.
These are the experts.
So, and I'll give you another example here.
And this is a darker example.
But if I was a member of a religious cult who worshipped Moloch, but Moloch, by the way, if you guys are not aware, and it is in the Bible, it's a deity that is associated with child sacrifice, okay?
If I came to you from that cult and I said, hey, sacrifice your children to me in exchange, I'll give you money.
You'd be like, what the heck?
I'm calling the police.
But if a science-backed journal dropped and it was like, women that have multiple abortions are more likely to earn money, more money over their lifetime, then you're like, oh, that doesn't sound as evil.
It's like choice.
That's modern psychology in a nutshell.
Okay.
It's turning, transforming what could be a Kabbalist religion or some other religion into a social science.
And I'm bringing this up because recently I did Jubilee.
And I'm sure you guys are familiar with Jubilee.
If you're not, you can head over and you can watch this.
It's painful to listen to.
And I decided to be surrounded by 20 feminists.
And truly, I'm always interested in wanting to learn and wanting to grow.
And I went there total good faith because I want women to kind of avoid some of the traps.
It's kind of one of those things like when people are older than you and they try to pass on some wisdom, but when you're young, you like are so sure of yourself.
Like, what do you know, older person with children?
I'm 18 and my life is, you know, I feel like I'm going to live forever.
And I'm not kidding when I say that.
I'm not even sure that my claims were even controversial, but it was stunning to hear them debate these claims and say that it was like the scientific evidence was in and they were right, because some of these things are just common sense.
So, my first claim was that the sexual revolution, so women getting naked all the time on your screen has devalued women, just being naked, and has also made them in the process less happy because who wants to be naked to be heard?
And take a listen to what this young woman, Nikki, said about women being objectified.
So, when we're talking about the value of women on a societal scale and how we view each other, right?
When you're devaluing us, you're objectifying us.
And follow me, I promise.
But rape rates have gone down by about half in the last 20 years, right?
So if you're saying we're less valuable now, why wouldn't we be suffering at a higher rate?
So is the argument that you're making, just so I understand, that because women are giving up sex for free, they're not being raped?
Every study shows rape is not correlated with just sexual gratification.
It is a power structure.
So it is about objectifying and abusing women when you rape them, not about whether or not you want sex.
What I am saying is that women are less objectified, so therefore we are being raped less.
Okay, so you think that in today's society, because this is pretty wild for me.
In the 1950s, you're saying women were more objectified than today in the land of OnlyFans, the Kardashian clan, and women that are essentially putting up their boobs and butts for free on Instagram.
You're saying we are now, we finally have achieved less objectification where women can't even get onto an advertising.
You can't even advertise a bag without them having to be naked in order for them to get a career as a model.
You're saying, oh, great, we've achieved actually less objectification.
So I'm not trying to suggest that I think that the over-commodification of women's bodies is positive.
But what I am saying is that when you're going to the 1950s, that we shouldn't put this glazed look of, oh, it was so happy.
We had single-income households and we got to stay home.
We also had a pill-popping problem.
We also were viewed as maids.
Like we were seen as a house appliance far more than we were as people.
And so when you have that kind of objectification where you are in a subservient position, I think we're facing a different form today.
But I think that rape is a signifier of a contradiction to your statement.
Does that make sense?
It doesn't make sense, but I do want to rebut it on a couple of points.
So first, I just want to say, suggesting that objectification has gone downward since the 1950s is wow.
That's just a firm no.
That is not the truth.
And you know that's not true.
Wait, so do you find that?
Hold on, let me answer your second thing.
Second thing.
You then brought up, okay, women were at home, but they were pill popping.
Well, you then have to acknowledge we're actually popping more pills now, right?
So we have actually increased our amount of pill popping.
Women are having overdoses on opioids.
And on top of that, since I think 1999, by rate, we are increasing our opioid use compared to men.
So women are not popping pills less because we're going into the workforce.
That's actually not true at all either.
That's good.
And we're also, like I said, to you, consuming alcohol more and binge drinking more than we did in the 1950s.
It is just amazing that this, I wanted to really show that clip because I think her heart's in the right place.
I think she's probably a very nice young woman.
But it is just stunning to me that women can enter into a classroom.
By the way, I want to count myself among that because I was young and definitely identified as a feminist.
Like I wasn't attending any marches, but if you had just come up to me and said, like, are you a feminist?
I would have said yes, because I learned it.
Like I learned in a book, like these women are offended by the phrase, make him a sandwich.
They were not alive in the 50s, but they are certain that all women in the 50s were popping pills and were unhappy because they read a study.
And it's incredible that there can be studies that convince people not to believe their own eyes.
Do you know what I mean?
That's what I'm speaking about when I'm referring to this sort of cult of science, something that C.S. Lewis referred to as scientism, where they can just create a study, say that we're the experts, and suddenly you've got people that are walking six feet social distancing, letting their grandmas die alone, and they're triple masked because, and double backsed because they read it somewhere in a journal that, you know, if you see your friend, you're going to die.
Like it's like final destination.
A bus is just going to come hit you.
You're going to be knocked sideways.
That's kind of a scary thing to process that I don't care what she read.
I don't care what book she was in.
I don't care who signed off on it, whether it was, you know, Dr. Fauci or her boyfriend.
You just need to open your eyes.
And of course, women are more objectified today.
Like, did you have a grandmother?
Everyone has a grandmother.
Do you feel your grandmother was more objectified, a different type of objective?
No.
Do you think, and by the way, and maybe I'm reading myself into it, my grandma was super happy.
I don't think women are more happy today than my grandmother was.
That's what I would just say off the bat.
But the whole idea of this cult of science is to make us not believe our own eyes.
Okay.
So my next claim was no career, and this should not even be controversial, guys.
Like this should not be even slightly controversial.
My next claim was no career will give women as much joy and fulfillment as raising their children.
Now, I want to be clear, guys.
That's not even controversial if I was in a room surrounded by 50 men, right?
20 men.
If I said, oh, your career is not going to fulfill you as much as your children, they'd probably go like, yeah, common sense.
Not this room.
Oh my, what is this?
This is the handsmade tail.
This is Candace just wants us to be at home.
How dare you say that children can provide joy?
That's just not, there are careers that will give you more joy than a child, than family.
And I want to tee up this next clip by letting you know, I didn't mention this to her face because if an idea works, you should not ever have to attack a person personally, right?
But this is interesting now as you reflect on this to tee this up, that this next young woman, young woman named Jasmine, for a living, she sells her Body.
Okay.
She has an OnlyFans.
She also has something called a Many Vids profile.
If you are a man, you can pay for Jasmine to make custom videos for you.
She's on Pornhub.
And again, I am only saying this because she is about to seriously make an argument, and she's angry.
She's angry about this that as a woman with a quote unquote career selling her body, her eventual children, according to the statistics, are going to fare off better because like, I don't know, she has, she'll have money.
And that's kind of the point.
Money equates to happiness.
Take a listen.
You say that women are more fulfilled at home with kids than going out into the workforce or getting educated, but that just really doesn't bear out when you look at the stats.
When you look at how working mothers are way less likely to be in poverty, maternal education is the number one predictor of childhood outcomes.
Better scores, getting higher incomes in the future, fewer behavioral problems, better mental health.
So it's weird to me with, and college-educated women are least likely to get divorced, and they're the only women, the top 10% of women are the only women whose marriage rates are going up.
So they're getting married, they're staying married, and their kids are doing better.
When you look at stay-at-home mothers, you see that they're more likely to report being depressed.
They're more likely to report having anxiety and anger and all these types of things.
So how can you say that?
Seems like a woman, if you want to get married and have kids, you should go to college and have a career.
So it sounds to me like we are looking at totally different statistics because everything that you said, I've actually read the exact opposite.
I'm glad we're on a fact check show.
We can't.
Right, exactly.
Oh, it's so exciting.
That's going to be amazing.
Okay, because I know, like I said, I think what we're talking about is that there was this widespread report on female happiness.
And I know that it was formally debunked and it was.
That's not what I'm talking about.
Pew Research, University of California.
In fact, working mothers today spend more time with their children than women did in the 1960s that were at home.
Okay.
Again, just hear what she said.
She said, working mothers today spend more time with their children than women who were stay-at-homes did back in the day.
That is, and I am sorry, I'm going to try to be polite here as polite as I can.
That is astoundingly stupid.
That is astounding.
Okay.
A stay-at-home mom was spending less time with her children than working mom.
What are you saying?
What were they doing?
What were they doing at home?
If they weren't taking care of their kids and you're telling me that they were impoverished, you just in one breath said they're less likely, your kids are more likely to be impoverished if your mom doesn't have a job.
Okay.
And now you're telling me that back when moms were at home, they were spending less time with their kids.
So who was watching these children?
Like, that's what I mean when I say at a certain point, you got to remove yourself from the social science and look around and go, would I just, would I just, does that make any sense?
Right.
What were they doing?
Just frolicking in the backyard while no one was watching were the kids raising themselves?
And in the 50s, the women were just like, you know, running around in the backyard gardening?
I don't know what her idea is here, but this is the point.
We have women that are so angry today.
They are angry at the idea that aspiring to family could make them happy.
And they are convinced that they feel this way out of their own authority, right?
That this is not something that this is, this is something that they have learned and that they are educated.
And that is the danger.
And I am telling you, there's no such thing as an atheist, okay?
All of these ideas that are coming to you was thought up by men that were a lot smarter than you, okay?
Men like Sigmund Freud.
I go back to that book.
Men like Sigmund Freud who said, actually, I'm going to indoctrinate you into my religion and to my belief.
Like I read yesterday when we read those quotations pertaining to the Kabbalah and their belief that you can merge the male and the female aspect.
Like that is, that is what they believe.
You look at the result today and you have women that want to be men.
At the same time, that culture is screaming at men that they should act like women.
Toxic masculinity.
Don't, don't, you should cry all the time.
Just be on TV, cry, and relinquish all those emotions.
And you're telling women, get to work, don't be around your kids.
In fact, recoil when someone suggests that a child might make you feel fulfilled.
That, my friends, is a social science, okay?
But actually, at the end of the day, you have been baptized into a very sinister religion.
You might want to peek your head up and look around.
That's all I'm going to say about that topic.
Anyways, I want to remind you guys about Pure Talk before I get into some of your comments, because what if I told you that you could cut your cell phone bill in half and support a U.S. company that shares your values, values like supporting our veterans and creating American jobs?
And if I told you that you don't even have to sacrifice your coverage to do that, because you'll be on America's most dependable 5G network.
I'm talking about the only wireless company that I endorse, which is Pure Talk, a wireless company that is veteran-led and invests in a U.S. customer service team so that you have the best support possible.
If you're with Verizon, AT ⁇ T, or T-Mobile, join the hundreds of thousands of people who have successfully cut their cell phone bill in half.
That's right.
The average family saves over $1,000 a year when they make the switch.
PureTalk is mine and my family's cell phone company, and it can be yours as well.
So switch in as little as 10 minutes when you head to puretalk.com slash Owens with plans starting at just $25 a month.
There's no reason for you to wait.
Head to puretalk.com slash Owens and make the switch to Pure Talk because it's wireless by Americans and for Americans.
Also, Nimi Skincare, you know, I use them.
The 4th of July weekend is about to get a whole lot better because their new skincare line just dropped and they are dropping their biggest sale of the year.
You can get 15% off everything at Nimeskincare.com, but only through this July 4th weekend.
So whether you're looking for refreshing cleaners, targeted serums, or hydrating moisturizers, Nimi has everything that you need to glow from face to feet.
Plus, on orders of $120 or more, you can get a free Nature Burst antioxidant mask.
So if you're tired of supporting beauty companies that hate your values, Nimi is your answer.
They are proudly American, conservative-owned, and grounded in faith, family, and freedom.
As a mom and wife, I trust Nimi Skincare to keep my skin looking its best without compromising my values.
Their products are packed with clinically proven ingredients, and everything is made right here in the USA.
When you choose Nimi, you are supporting your friends and your neighbors.
You're voting with your wallet and you're supporting the parallel economy.
This Independence Day, vote with your wallet.
Do not wait.
The sale will end soon.
Head to Nimiskincare.com and use code FREEDOM to save 15% on your entire order.
Again, that's NimiSkincare.com and you can use code FREEDOM to save 15%.
All right, you guys, let me see what you are thinking what is going on in your mind?
Liz writes, Let's discuss the Jubilee episode, particularly how Jasmine, the Jasmine girl, only screamed and everyone found it amusing.
It's clear that feminists can often embody the behavior of mean girls, just like lively.
That's my point.
Like, that is my point.
I obviously, as I represent my platform and I tell people that modern feminism is something else, like deep down, secretly, these women are miserable.
They don't come across as happy and rounded and, you know, wanting to explain to you the philosophy of how they arrived at such happiness.
They're angry.
They're so angry and they're confused.
And yeah, I consider it a mission when I go and I sit down with them.
I'm like, I want you to understand, like, don't make this mistake.
Don't fall for this.
These are not your ideas.
These are ideas that have been implanted in your mind.
And if you don't wake up to that fact soon, you're going to be miserable.
I'm sorry, but I am not convinced, maybe you are, that in the future, Jasmine's kids are not going to suffer.
They're going to be less likely to suffer from mental illnesses because she has money.
I think that when your mother engages in selling her body for profit, when your mother has an OnlyFans and you're a teenager and you're in school and literally your homies can sign up to your mom on OnlyFans, that's probably going to contribute to, I don't know, maybe some mental issues.
You might have a feeling about that.
Again, I'm not a doctor.
You certainly shouldn't trust me because I'm not an expert, but I do have common sense.
And so, yeah, I'm not so sure that that's a happy and rounded individual that we are looking at.
Ben writes, Candice, I said before you inspired me back into my faith.
So thought I'd let you know that I am now a minister of the Eucharist.
Wow, amazing in my local parish.
Thank you for being so inspiring.
That is so great, Ben.
That makes me so happy.
Those are the best comments that I receive is that because we talk about faith and whether or not we're muggles and there's this whole spiritual battle going on, which there is, that people are realizing they better get armed really quick.
You don't want to be, you don't want to be Dudley and Harry Potter, right?
You don't want to be Vernon and Petunia.
It's just not, you don't want to be those people.
Those aren't, those aren't the characters you want to be.
Chris writes, it was, he writes, quote, this is a George Orwell quote from 1984.
It was always the women and above all the young ones who were the most bigoted adherents of the party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers out of unorthodoxy.
That's really interesting because I learned a fun fact about George Orwell, which we discussed on my book club, that he, I think he was writing 1984 as fiction, but he knew some things about some of the Freemasons that were working.
And I learned that he reported Charlie Chaplin, who was extremely problematic and was definitely some agent in Hollywood, as being someone that was working for the state.
He actually did that.
So that's a random fun fact about George Orwell.
I definitely think that he knew something, people that were kind of planning to crush Christian culture, which we are learning about right now in Hollywood Babylon, which we're reading at the moment.
Boldie writes, are they stupid?
You do not go after Candice like that if you don't want to go down.
Rest in peace, Blake and co.
Justice for our kombucha drinking cousin Justin.
Do they think Candice, who went scorched earth on Mr. Macrone, would not take those dumb bullies on?
They clearly didn't know what they've gotten themselves into.
The lively subpoena was the chef's kiss.
Oh, the live subpoena was a chef's kiss.
Yeah, I just feel they must be new here.
Like they clearly do not watch my podcast.
If they think that I am being paid to say things to make me popular or to, they are, they're just new here.
They're just like a new student, new class, first day feels, don't know who knows who.
Because if you watch any of my content, you know that I would never do that.
Like I would rather literally be fired publicly than to say something that I don't believe in.
That's just not who I am.
And at the end of the day, I maintain that Justin Baldoni is the victim in this case.
I've read through all of the documents.
Nothing has dissuaded me against that.
And I think he's being further victimized because at the same time that she is talking out of her mouth, saying, oh my gosh, look what they did.
They coordinated with the press.
Look what she's doing.
I found out my subpoena on TMZ.
A source tells us who's the source?
Who is sending the subpoena?
It's Blake.
And by the way, another one of my lawyers got a heads up about it like after I found out on TMZ.
And he was like, here's what I'm hearing is in it.
And, you know, Blake is planning on delivering that to your door tomorrow.
He's like July 2nd.
So he knows that it's arriving tomorrow, which means she knew I wasn't going to get it today.
And she wanted to beat me by sending out her narrative in the press so people would wrongly be convinced that I was coordinating with Justin Baldoni, who I've never met and never spoken to in my entire life.
Like she's still victimizing Justin Baldoni, in my viewpoint.
If you want to hear it, Judge Lehman.
Because I'm telling you, me and Savannah, we're ready.
We are ready for this lawsuit.
We've been talking about wanting to show up.
We got coordinated outfits.
We're like Ellwoods out here.
We are bend and snap.
Bend and snap.
Call me, literally.
What else do you want to see in my phone, Blake?
We don't need to put lawyers between us.
Give me a phone call and I will let you know what is in there as it pertains to you.
And I was so nice.
I was so nice about your ring.
Unbelievable that you would try to subpoena me and leak it at TMZ.
You disgust me.
You disgust the world right now.
I'm ashamed of you.
Lastly, Platinum FX22 writes, haha, Baldoni now has a million more cousins he didn't know he had.
Are they going to subpoena us all?
That's what I'm talking about.
Baldoni, gang, gang, subpoena us all.
Okay, that would be absolutely amazing.
Oh, and lastly, Popcorn Planet has just written.
He's watching this live.
Did you get your subpoena?
Did he get his subpoena?
Can you see, do you see in the chat?
Did he say whether you got a subpoena?
He probably found out on TMZ, I would imagine.
He writes, we don't agree on every topic, but I applaud your stance here, standing up to these powerful bullies.
Please have your team reach out.
Would love to speak and have you in our documentary.
It ends with justice.
This would be the first correspondence, by the way, Blake, since we're doing the subpoena live, that I've ever had with Popcorned Planet.
Truly, this is it.
He wrote onto my show.
So I don't know what to tell you, girlfriend.
It just ain't happening.
It is not happening, but it's happening for me.
Today was a brilliant day.
And tomorrow, I have a feeling it's also going to be a great day because some other weird stuff is happening in the background, but I got to wait to tell you.
Yeah, we got to wait.
I'm sorry to leave you on this cliffhanger.
▲
Export Selection