All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 26, 2024 - Candace Owens
38:06
Tik-Tok Panic! Women Prove They Don’t Know History. Do Men?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Happy Monday, everybody.
All right, let's check in on women in the media.
First up, we have Nikki Haley.
It looks like she'll be staying in the race despite losing in every state against Trump.
Also, it looks like BLM is staying in the race game.
We have a woman professor who has just come out and said that she feels like it's, quote, slightly racist to be a Taylor Swift fan.
Hmm.
And speaking of which, Taylor Swift is definitely looking like she wants to stay in her relationship, despite the fact that the press and her fans seem to be turning against Travis Kelce.
They are saying that he has made some behavioral missteps and it is badly impacting her brand.
But first and foremost, and most importantly, we have apparently reached the great feminist schism.
To IVF or not to IVF?
That is apparently the question after an Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are considered children.
Yeah, and some women are losing their minds on, you guessed it, TikTok.
What can I say guys?
It's just another manic Monday.
All that and more today you guys, coming up on Candace Owens.
🎵 Outro Music 🎵 All right, so we'll first just jump into some science here.
When an egg and a sperm come together, we call that an embryo.
And why are we talking about embryos today?
I am not a scientist.
I am not a doctor.
Well, it's because women are freaking out because the Alabama Supreme Court has just said in a recent decision that an embryo is considered a child.
Now, I, call me crazy, I thought people knew that.
I thought that was the reason people were turning to IVF, because they wanted children, but apparently we're in some dystopian future, and people are saying, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
This is very bad.
And men and people are trying to control our bodies.
So let's actually listen to some of these ladies that are on TikTok very upset.
Take a listen.
I want to be very clear.
This decision to consider embryos as children is the direct result of the overturning of Roe and exactly what we tried to sound the alarm about when people on the right told us we were being hysterical because the overturning of Roe was simply about states' rights.
Now we have a court decision that calls embryos extrauterine children.
I'm sorry, is a seed a flower?
First grade science teachers, please let us know.
What about embryos that now need to be permanently stored but people can't afford to?
Are those embryos now going to be up for adoption to people who want them?
Could there be a little you running around somewhere because you couldn't afford to store your embryo?
And don't forget there are plenty of birth controls that impede implantation.
Are those now going to be considered some sort of murder device?
Birth controls that impede implantation.
Is that a murder device?
I'm actually glad she's asking this question.
I also want to make sure that I'm very careful here because I don't mean to offend or to insult anybody that has pursued IVF.
I have friends who have used IVF and their stories and the emotionality behind that journey of wanting to have a child.
I get it.
I get why there is an emotional investment in this.
And some of the arguments people are making, as you can hear there, are economic.
What if you can't afford to store the embryo but you still want to have a child?
What if you don't want to implant all of the embryos because you can't afford to raise multiples?
You can't have twins.
You can't have three children.
All of this feels so wrong and it feels like you're attacking women.
But I also want you to listen very carefully because these arguments are so surface.
All arguments today are really surface.
What they lack is any historical understanding of anything.
I would say that when you come to a historical understanding of what's happened here, you will probably end up like me, which is you will become a person that very much sympathizes with these women who are struggling to have children and are not sure why.
A lot of these people are victims.
They're victims of lies, and they're victims of propaganda.
But to become a student of history means to also recognize that the arguments that they are making right now, the arguments that are being produced, are essentially people that are begging for the state to control their bodies.
Not the opposite.
Those women that you just heard, they are begging for the states to control their bodies.
So, what has actually happened here through the lens of human history?
What is it that actually happened?
I will tell you.
It was a movement during the progressive era which began with the explicit aim to sterilize stupid people.
Yeah.
We want to sterilize people that are defective, that are morally defective, people that are not smart, people that are not maybe people that are deep on history.
And sometimes it was racial.
A lot of times it was racial.
They targeted black women.
They targeted other minorities.
They targeted other immigrant groups.
And then they got to a point where they were like, no, even people that are stupid need to be sterilized.
They cannot have more children because they will produce more stupid people.
So, the end result of a movement that began with the aim to sterilize women is that now in our society we have a ton of women who are unfortunately sterile.
And those women have also been conditioned through propaganda to sterilize themselves.
Again, she's bringing up birth control, and I'm glad she did.
She said, oh, you know, what about what birth control does?
Yes, what about what birth control does and why it was created?
Let me tell you guys about a man named Dr. Clarence Gamble.
Let me tell you who Dr. Clarence Gamble was, because he has long past.
I want you guys to meet the good Dr. Gamble.
Here's a photo of him.
Wow.
Very nice looking.
Glasses.
He looks studious.
He looks smart.
He's also very wealthy.
He was heir to Procter & Gamble.
On his 21st birthday, he received money from his family.
He received his first $1 million.
It's nice to be rich.
I wish I got a million dollars when I turned 21.
Now, that's the good news.
That's all the good news that I really have about him, because aside from the fact that he was rich and I think rather good-looking, he also happened to be a racist and an ardent eugenicist.
He was actively involved in the eugenic sterilization group, which was called Birthright, which later became the Human Betterment Association.
Here's a quotation from that guy.
He once wrote, quote, the mass of Negroes, particularly in the South, still breed carelessly
and disastrously, with the result that the population increase among Negroes is from
that portion, least intelligent and fit, and least able to rear children properly.
So he gets his money and he starts looking at the problem even more.
He links up with Margaret Sanger and he's like, we just have to start opening sterilization clinics.
And that's what Dr. Gamble did.
He opened more than 20 eugenic sterilization clinics in the Midwest and the South.
And then he was still worried because he was just like, you know what, we are not sterilizing the population fast enough.
Amble was elected by Margaret Sanger as the president of the Pennsylvania Birth Control Federation in 1933, and he served as a Pennsylvanian representative on the board of Sanger's American Birth Control League, and then, of course, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
He was on that board from 1933.
Until 1946, because they had the same aims.
Read the writings of Margaret Sanger.
It is all about how can we sterilize these people, but also we need to get good at propaganda.
They wrote about what is going to be the birth control propaganda.
How are we going to convince women instead to sterilize themselves?
Because, you know, these evil vibes, what we're talking about, us educated people, about how we just can't mass produce dumb people.
Yeah, we don't want that getting out to the public.
And to that effect, all of the great eugenicist, racist leaders of that progressive era wrote letters to one another and just talked about how they could mass-convince people to sterilize themselves.
Which brings us to Margaret Sanger.
Here's a photo of her.
Now to recap, of course, she is apparently a hero today because nobody knows history and because we are living in an ever-present.
But she wrote a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble about what they were terming the Negro Project because she believed ultimately, and this is a quote from her, that, quote, birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race, end quote.
She also said this.
Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives, or of those who will become defectives.
Birth control must ultimately lead to a cleaner race.
In addition to that, here is an archived letter, a letter that she wrote to Dr. Clarence Gamble, and here is what she said in part.
If we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which I believe will have far-reaching results among the colored people.
His work, in my opinion, should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the county's white doctors.
His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us.
She then goes on to say that we should also include the church in trying to convince people to do this.
And she writes, So why is that significant?
to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can
Straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members
So why is that significant because that plan which the reason why she's talking about Negroes in particular is
because dr Clarence Gamble as I mentioned was very much concerned
about black people who were in the South He thought having way too many children, but it's what's
happened today Obviously right that birth control propaganda. It was so
effective and impactful By saying to women that it's going to give you freedom
When in fact it was the state that did not want you to be able to have children and they were creating medicine
To make that plausibility less likely they're doing this exact same thing
It's your doctor who when they come out of medical school you get to an ob-gyn clinic
And they tell you nothing about the side effects, and they're just like no it's gonna be great. You can control your body
This was the genesis of this.
Appeal to the doctors, appeal to the ministers, make it seem like it's a thing about women who just really want opportunities in life.
That's where the entire reproductive health movement comes from.
Then, of course, as that woman mentioned, if you look into what birth control does, if you look into the history of birth control, it does make it less likely that you are going to have children.
I mean, here are just some of the side effects that are listed on birth control FDA inserts that nobody ever reads, because you trust the doctor, today.
Tells you you can get breast cancer.
You can get cervical cancer.
You can get liver disease.
You can get high blood pressure.
You can get gallbladder disease.
You can become depressed.
These are the side effects that are just recognized.
But, I don't know, I guess just trust your doctor or whatever.
Go look at the studies and why they, when they tested these products, were doing it amongst Africans.
Yeah, they were going to Zimbabwe and injecting them and making them take pills, or why they were forcing people that were in colonies and hospitals to take these sorts of medicines, including, by the way, Native Americans.
This is the history that you don't know because you're not meant to know.
You're not meant to know it, because the same people that were behind this eugenicist movement were ultimately the people who created the textbooks that you learned from in school.
Among them, the Rockefellers, right?
The Rockefellers.
They were behind the General Board of Education.
They were also supporters of eugenicism.
And so yeah, when I see these women and their eyes on TikTok, I swear TikTok creates the eye thing.
They're all looking crazy.
They're like, ah, no, this is gonna be, this shows you the state is trying to control our bodies.
No, it shows you that the state is now going to take an even more drastic step.
You are fighting for the state to control your bodies, okay?
The state has already won.
They control your bodies because you're not even able to produce a child without turning to the state, the institutions that the state built, without turning to doctors.
They are now—think about how dark this is, right?
This is why I say it is virtually satanic.
They are now dictating birth, right?
Like, you have to come to a clinic to be able to have one child because we have polluted your body so much throughout your life.
A few generations ago, they were able to have nine kids.
Now people are struggling to produce one, and all of the information is online about why that is, and yet you just have the wool over your eyes.
You, your husband, all of us.
I'm not trying to, by the way, judge you, because I didn't know this until I became a student of history, until I really understood how sinister this movement was.
And now, well, now they're advocating too for euthanasia, for the states to be able to convince you why even death is aspirational.
So they'll be able soon in the future, in the dystopian future, you will come to the state to be able to have one child, and they will determine whether or not you are fit to have a child.
And then they will encourage you to kill yourself as an act of bravery.
That's what's around the corner.
Unless women stop it.
Unless women wake up and realize that we lost control of our bodies a long time ago.
And only education is going to turn that around.
And that's all I'm going to say about that.
Alright guys, I talk about Preborn a lot on this show because I believe in their mission.
Preborn's network of clinics is saving as many babies as they can from the clutches of abortion.
Their clinics are located in the darkest corners of the nation where the majority of abortions take place.
Preborn offers expecting mothers free ultrasounds, because when a troubled mother hears her baby's heartbeat, most of the time she will choose life.
I was just kind of like, Lord, if this is, you know, if this is the way, you know, let me know.
If this is not the way, give me a sign, you know, before I walk through these doors.
And I was, as I was getting ready to walk up the steps and touch the doorknob, you know, a guardian angel.
And he just told me, he was like, baby, you don't have to go in there.
And he was like I know someone that can help him.
Just to see the development of a baby that small and I say baby because I mean he had little arms and legs and I mean you know it was actually a human you know and to see that and to have that physical and that contact once you look at that I think it just pulls on your heart a little.
Every day, Preborn rescues 200 babies, but by the time this message is done, two more babies will have lost their lives.
Because these abortion giants do not stop.
We need everyone listening to say, enough, and help fight for these unborn babies.
One ultrasound costs just $28 and can save a life today.
So join me in the fight for life.
To donate securely, dial pound 250 and say the keyword, baby.
That's pound 250 and say the keyword, baby.
Or, go to preborn.com slash Candice.
That's preborn.com slash Candice.
Okay, now it's time for some Topics du Jour.
♪♪ Nikki Haley, man, I have to say, I...
I think I'm becoming a fan.
I don't know.
There's just something about it.
I can't look away from it.
Like, she's got nothing going on in her bird brain at all.
She's just a vessel.
So you just get to insert, depending on how much money you have, her ideas.
She doesn't believe in anything, actually.
She just believes in the almighty dollar, which doesn't make her extraordinary.
That's pretty much what's happened in the United States.
That's what D.C.
is.
It's why we call it a swamp, because our politicians I will serve the Constitution, and I will serve you, and I'm going to D.C.
to clean it up, get a broom.
Then they get there, and some lobby comes to them, and they're like, actually, we have money, and so now your ideas are our ideas.
That is the problem with lobbying.
It should be abolished.
Well, Nikki Haley has very clearly been lobbied by the deep state, and I'm talking, referring to the military-industrial complex.
That woman wants a war.
She wants a war as soon as possible.
She doesn't know why, but the checks are clearing.
And it's very obvious now that we don't even think she's, forget serving the country,
we don't know who her master is, but we know that it is not,
obviously not the American people.
And yet she stays in the race despite losing in her own states.
Yes, she just lost to Trump in South Carolina.
You would think a normal person would drop out.
But a normal person is not Nikki Haley.
A normal person is not a vessel that goes to the highest bidder.
So, somebody asked her about why she is still staying in the race, despite all of the evidence that she can't win against Trump.
And here's what she had to say.
Take a listen.
This Saturday, the primary.
How do you get there beyond this state when you haven't won a state yet?
How do you win your first state?
I mean, it's amazing to say I haven't won a state yet.
You've only had three states that have voted.
Well, it's not amazing.
South Carolina's going to take all.
I mean, he's going to pick up more delegates.
South Carolinians have not voted yet.
South Carolinians have not voted yet.
Look, if you and everybody else tells me to get out of this race, it will be the longest general election race in history.
Yep, so despite losing the primary, she is just gonna stay in it.
She's just gonna keep plugging along because she's got money and she's being obviously funded to do that.
And you know what?
I'm gonna stick up for her here.
Harris Faulkner, it is amazing.
She is amazing.
Can you imagine what it has to be like to just have absolutely no soul and just whoever gives you money, you just say whatever they want you to say.
You will say literally anything for a dollar.
I think she is amazing.
And so I obviously understand now that Democrats are showing up for her.
And if you needed more proof of that, of what I have been telling you guys all along about her, look no further than the fact that Gavin Newsom, yeah, that crazy guy from California, governor of California, He's throwing his weight behind Nikki Haley.
Take a listen.
Do you think that it is time for Nikki Haley to drop out of the race?
And do Democrats want the general election to begin in earnest?
I don't know why Democrats would want her out of the race.
She's one of our better surrogates.
I mean, she's defining the opposition to Trump incredibly effectively.
I mean, she's making points I'm applauding every single day about his temperament, his capacity, his unraveling in real time.
And so I think she's been incredibly effective.
So I hope she stays in, personally.
Thank you, Gavin.
It's very honest and it's true that she is a Democrat surrogate.
Which brings me back to the point that Vivek Ramaswamy made.
You guys remember that?
People were like, Candace, why are you supporting Vivek Ramaswamy?
Because people need to listen to him.
And he was suggesting that there was a plan from the deep state, a well-funded plan, Despite the fact that Nikki Haley was third at that time, she was behind Trump and she was behind DeSantis, she was staying in the race and Mubakar Ramaswamy said that it looked like that was the candidate that the deep state was getting behind, not only because she is a vessel, but also because he felt that they wanted to turn it into a two-person race between Biden and Nikki Haley, two puppets that the deep state can and do control.
And everyone didn't listen to him then.
And I hope that people are now starting to listen and recognizing how strange it is that she is not dropping out of the race, that she never for once has signified that she might drop out of the race.
This is not normal behavior in politics unless something that is much more sinister is going on.
And that is my belief, that Vivek Ramaswamy had it right.
They have a plan of how they're going to get rid of Trump.
And we're seeing how, I don't know, every lawsuit, I should sue Trump.
I think I should, I'm just going to sue him for $900 million in New York.
In my lawsuit, I'm going to write nothing.
He didn't do anything to me.
And I'm probably still going to win, because that is how corrupt the court systems are against Donald Trump right now.
Moving on, you guys, because women are just doing and saying whatever they want.
That's how I feel.
I just think that's what's happening right now, since the internet was born.
Well, we have a BLM chapter co-founder.
Her name is Malina Abdullah.
She's the co-founder of the BLM Los Angeles chapter and also the co-director of the activist wing of the advocacy of the organization Black Lives Matter Grassroots.
So she is a BLM.
And she just took to Twitter and just threw this out.
She wrote, why do I feel like it's slightly racist to be a Taylor Swift fan?
You might look at that tweet and you say, that's so crazy.
You don't have to listen to her at all.
I will then tell you again that she She is a professor.
She's actually a professor of Pan-African Studies at Cal State University in Los Angeles.
So people are listening to her in some capacity.
She's got a student body, so you mind yourself.
She also added this to the tweet.
Why do I feel like this was some right-wing, white supremacist conspiracy?
Boo!
Hashtag Super Bowl.
So people are attaching those two feelings because they came on the same day, and they're covering her and her idea that people that support Taylor Swift are racist.
And now, you might be saying, Candace, that's ridiculous.
And you'd be right, but I gotta be a Melina Stan right now, and I'll tell you why.
It's got nothing to do with Taylor Swift.
Like I said, that is poignantly ridiculous.
But because she was really honest.
When reporters came to her, when people asked her to elaborate on that opinion.
Elaborate, Melina!
How is it that being a Taylor Swift fan is racist?
She replied by saying, Oh, okay.
Great.
So, she's being honest.
I think she has been the greatest and most honest representation of the BLM movement on a whole, which was guided by feelings and very little facts to back up those feelings.
You know, I just feel like we're facing a lot of white supremacy.
When black men don't listen to police officers and get harmed in the process, right?
That really was the entire BLM movement in a nutshell.
So it's not at all surprising that she is unable to back anything that she has said about Taylor Swift with any logic.
You just better leave Melina alone, okay?
Girls are feeling on the internet and she is one of them.
Speaking of Taylor Swift, though, as I said to you, hmm, the press seems to be turning against Travis Kelce.
This always happens, by the way.
If you pay attention to the trends, Taylor Swift gets a boyfriend, and then what happens is her fans sort of problematize the boyfriends.
She's in a toxic relationship with her fans because, like I tell you guys all the time, her fans are teenyboppers, their brains are not developed, and they have tons of feelings and very little facts, and they want to believe that she's a perfect Barbie who does no wrong.
And she's now leaning into that stereotype.
So it creates a very toxic scenario where when she dates anybody, they're like, this is what's wrong with them.
So you may have already forgotten, but she dated Matt Healy for a couple of weeks when she came out of the relationship with Joe Alwyn.
And then her fans said, no, he said horrible stuff in a podcast.
And so she evaporated from that relationship.
And now came the Travis Kelce, and people were invested in the Super Bowl.
And Taylor Swift won the Super Bowl.
And now people are starting to notice.
Look at this headline.
Some things about Travis Kelce is what they're starting to notice.
The Daily Mail headline reads, Why Taylor Swift Still Needs to Protect Her Billion Dollar Brand Amid Travis-Kelce Romance.
An expert warns NFL stars' recent quote, behavioral missteps could become a problem for the singer.
You know what I appreciate right away is the fact that the Daily Mail actually went out and got an expert.
On the matter.
That is how much the Taylor Swift image means to the world.
So they called up an expert and they said, what is your expert opinion about his behavior?
So here's what happened.
Her fandom, if that's what we're calling them, Swifties, didn't much like it.
The first sign was when he hit his 65-year-old coach, Andy Reid.
Remember, guys, that little moment from the Super Bowl?
Let me jog your memory.
Here it is.
Comes over to Andy.
He goes, keep me in.
What happened is, on the fumble, he was not in the game.
Noah Gray went in.
Now, ultimately, they ended up letting that moment slide because, you know, it's the Super Bowl.
People get emotional.
Plus, they won, so now the excitement of winning.
And then Travis Kelce, when he did win, gave a speech and he said that he, quote, owes his entire career to that guy, Andy Reid, and being able to control how emotional I get.
And I just love him, man.
So, yeah, a little indication there that he's got some emotions and that this coach has helped him through those various emotions throughout his career.
Then her fandom got upset because there was the shooting that happened at the Kansas City Super Bowl parade just a few days later.
And despite that shooting, they felt that Travis Kelce made a, quote, spectacularly insensitive decision to party hard after the mass shooting.
And they were really angry about that.
The end conclusion was that 22 fans were shot.
And just hours after that, nine children among those fans, a young mother died.
Travis decided to hit up a restaurant and a bar, and he took selfies with cops while carrying an open beer bottle on the street, having earlier taken to the parade stage, and also appearing way too drunk to speak.
Here's Travis Kelce again.
Blame it all on my roots.
I showed up in boots and ruined the Niners affair.
The last one to know.
We were the last one to show.
We were the last one they thought they'd see there.
And I saw the surprise, that fear in their eyes.
And we took that glass of champagne.
Pat, Pat took that glass of champagne, I promise you.
Don't hate me for enjoying that.
I mean, whatever.
Look it, he's legal, he's 34 years old, gonna be 35 this year, and Travis likes to party.
They're celebrating a Super Bowl.
As I said, nothing problematic about that per se, but they're looking at this through the lens of Taylor Swift, who they believe is 15 years old.
And you know, at the Super Bowl, she was getting a little crunk, too.
She was chugga-luggin'.
I told you, she's in her college girl phase.
Let her be.
And they are not happy because this drinking seems to have carried on.
Last week, he was at a club in Las Vegas spraying champagne.
Take a look.
And here's another video of him smoking in the club, this time next to Taylor.
We don't know what he's smoking, but take a look.
Personally, I don't have a problem with it, because as I said, this is Taylor Swift in her college phase, okay?
Guys, she's out of high school now mentally, and she's jumping into college.
And in college, you follow the guy to the club, he gets too drunk, he says some bad stuff, you get into fights because he's drinking and he's partying.
And yeah, these relationships tend not to work out.
But when you're Taylor Swift, Just to be clear, we're at least going to get an album out of it.
So be happy.
Rejoice, Taylor Swift fans.
Leave Travis Kelce alone.
Now, do I agree with people, the general public, that this is not how 34-year-olds should be behaving?
Yes, because as I've mentioned, I'm the same age as these people, and I don't party like this at all.
I think if you are a person and you do smoke, you could do that at home.
I don't really see the reason to do this at a nightclub, but I'm not their parents, okay?
Leave Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce alone.
I'm looking forward to the college album.
All right, before we end the show, I do want to give an honorable mention to the Jerusalem Post.
So last week, I was just covering history.
History, if you start to realize, it really offends people.
It's weird.
You can cover it fact-based, and somebody's like, no, don't look over here, you're not allowed to see it, because everything has been largely politicized.
And as I said, we are living in a ever present.
People only know what happened yesterday and what is going to happen tomorrow.
And they think they're educated because they Googled something.
And Google exists, I am now recognizing, to hide history.
Wikipedia exists to obscure history, to obscure the truth, to not make things look so bad, to modify it slowly.
Because they know people are not gonna go back and pursue real education and actually read books.
They're not gonna read anything that the historians are writing.
Anyways, we covered the rise of psychology and how I was able to trace it.
I've been reading some books to a bunch of pedophiles and perverts, and among them I mentioned Sigmund Freud.
He happens to be Jewish, but it wasn't relevant to me whatsoever.
I also mentioned people that were not Jewish, like Dr. John Money and a couple of other psychologists, but I also went hard on Magnus Hirschfeld.
And of course, you had radicals who took me out of context and tried to present it as though I was defending the Nazis burning down Jewish stuff at all.
Or, no, I just told you a historical fact.
They burned down the sex institute because they deemed it to be perverted.
That big brown shirt.
It was a student group that did this.
And the Jerusalem Post covered it, and I have to tell you, I was holding my breath.
I was like, they are probably going to say something bad.
And I was wrong.
They actually just covered what I said.
They said, this is the headline, Candace Owens attacking, quote, pedophiles and perverts, takes aim at 1930s Jewish sexologists.
Now, of course, they're pointing out that he's Jewish because this is the Jerusalem Post, and they have, obviously, a certain aim.
They cover, obviously, Jewish news stories.
So I'm not offended by the fact that they didn't mention that I also covered other people, including Margaret Sanger, who was very much American and not Jewish at all.
Their article, they just tell the truth.
They tell exactly what I said.
They didn't remove it from its context whatsoever.
They also went on to include my full statement, which videos that were circulating online did not do.
They included the fact that I said that Despite the fact that they did this and burned it down, it does not justify the Institute being burned down.
But also, we should not be defending pedophiles and perverts.
Like, two things can be true at once.
Magnus Hirschfeld was an absolute pervert.
And what he did, by the way, they asked, what was she talking about, the Jerusalem Post Yes, that is a fact.
And at Jerusalem Post, if you're watching, I will include some links so that you can explore that further.
But what they sought to do was to justify homosexuality, transgenderism—I'm talking about the group of psychologists—and transgenderism by producing academic studies to basically say, all of this is normal.
It's always existed in the world.
And part of that meant going down to Africa and photographing Africans and studying the way that they were having sex.
How else do you study the way that they are having sex?
And he would take these photographs and he would put them up in his institute, whether he was viewing it as artistic or whether he was, you know, viewing it as a study.
It's disgusting.
Think about the Africans, right?
Think about people that were colonizing the Africans and then studying them.
Because they wanted to convince the public that being trans was normal, or that wanting to have sex with somebody that was younger, you know, a minor, was normal.
Him and a group of psychologists were doing exactly this.
They were trying to create academic studies to justify what I deem to be their own perversions.
So, again, I'm just shouting out the Muslim Post because I normally will call out people if they are being smear merchants and they are lying about what I've said.
But I also want to highlight when they're not lying about what I've said and they're just allowing the public to see what I said in its entire context and make up their minds all by themselves.
So, shout out to the Jerusalem Post for just doing some normal journalism.
Sleep is the foundation of our mental and physical health.
You must have a consistent nighttime routine to function at your very best.
If you're struggling with sleep, you need to check out Beam.
Other sleep aids can cause next-day grogginess, but Beam contains a powerful all-natural blend of L-theanine and melatonin to help you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed.
It's not just your run-of-the-mill sleep aid, either.
It's a concoction carefully crafted to help you rest without the grogginess that often accompanies other sleep remedies.
Several people on my team use Beam to sleep better through the night, and they show up very much ready to work.
And today, my listeners get a special discount on BEAM's Dream Powder, their science-backed healthy hot cocoa for sleep with no added sugar.
Better sleep has never tasted better.
Now available in delicious flavors like cinnamon cocoa, chocolate peanut butter, and mint chip, better sleep has never tasted better.
You just mix BEAM Dream into hot water or milk, stir or froth, and enjoy it before bedtime.
If you find yourself struggling to sleep, give it a shot.
You want to try Beam's best-selling Dream Powder?
Get up to 40% off for a limited time when you go to shopbeam.com slash candice and use code candice at checkout.
That's shopbeam.com slash candice and use code candice for up to 40% off.
Alright guys, we are up against the clock here, but I'm going to read at least a couple of your comments.
I know the show should be longer, Candace.
It should.
It should.
But I don't want to do that work.
These are just a couple of comments pertaining to the daughter and daddy drama that played out on TikTok that I cannot look away from, where the daughter just She lied about her childhood.
At first I thought she lied innocently, but then I realized it was quite sinister when I learned from the father that he has been giving her money up until currently.
And he definitely, at least financially, has not been a dead bee.
And it does look like she had quite a chummy childhood.
And it does foster a conversation about men and why they are feeling so angry about the institution of marriage and their treatment within the court systems after a divorce.
Debbie writes, My ex brainwashed my son against me.
He took him at 14 and I haven't been able to spend one birthday or holiday with him since.
He's 21 now.
It's not always the mom.
More and more men are keeping kids from their moms.
So moral of the story is it can be either parent and evil is evil no matter what.
You are correct.
That is a very relevant point.
It happens no matter what.
It tends to be the circumstance, unfortunately, that whoever has majority custody of the children, they're able to control the narrative about what happened in the divorce.
Because, listen, we're humans.
We see things from our own sides.
And you want people to sympathize and to empathize with you.
But it's, of course, problematic when the people that you are looking for When it comes to sympathy are your own children and it pollutes their very necessary relationship with either their mother or their father.
Kelly Craft writes, My father certainly didn't do any of that for me before or after my parents' divorce.
They've been divorced for 21 years and she's been dead for 7 years.
He still makes no effort, leaving me an orphan by default.
Poor thing must have been so hard being privileged with a father that actually cares.
This is me shedding a tear for her.
Poor Maddie.
Look, I think Maddie just wanted a little bit of TikTok fame, and she got it.
And she's talented, and she's interesting.
So it wasn't necessary for her to step on her very much present father's head to achieve more fame, especially when he shows that they text all the time, and he thought they had a good relationship.
It's just something that she didn't have to do.
And again, I am not saying that a financial arrangement replaces a father, but it looks like a lot more than a financial arrangement was taking place when it came to Maddie and her father.
It looks like they had a very real relationship until she became a teenager.
And women, we know, when we become teenagers, we're a little finicky.
We're just, you know, a little unstable.
And sometimes we keep up that instability well into our adulthood, which I think you have probably seen if you have watched all of today's episode.
Lastly, Ginger Snapchat writes, older teenagers and young adults usually stray from their parents, with the younger ones having their own friends and influences outside their family.
If they come from a good family, they come back in their 30s and apologize because they start to see how things really are.
That is correct.
And it is so true to say, as the father did in those videos, that teenage girls just want to hang out with their friends.
We basically want nothing to do with our parents, the majority of us, I would say, because we're trying to assert our independence.
And so I'm not shocked that Maddie wanted to spend less time with her father as she got older.
And it is true that when you have children, It shifts the dynamic.
You look at your parents different because you are starting to have the same experiences that they are having.
And so that will probably either make you closer or maybe it will reaffirm your belief that your parents are absolutely nuts.
Who knows?
We are holding out for Maddie and her daddy to come back together in the future because it's bad.
It's always sad when relationships fall apart.
But her dad, I think he's a little bit of a legend.
That's my personal opinion.
Ladies and gentlemen, unfortunately, that is all the time that we have for today's episode.
▲
Export Selection