Yep, today on the show, I am going to give you guys a pop quiz, and here is how it is going to work.
In the comments section, or just mentally in your head if you're listening to this on audio, I want you to record how many of these three historical facts that I'm about to present You already knew.
So basically, if you knew all of them, you're going to put 3, you're going to put a 2, or you're going to put a 1, or you're going to put a 0.
That's what's coming up next.
And later on in the show, the heated debate—remember the one that I showed you earlier in the week between daddy and daughter that broke out on TikTok when she accused her dad of being a deadbeat breakdancer?
Yeah, that debate is still going on between those two, and I think that we should talk about it.
Because the father is bringing up some very interesting points.
I don't know why, but we never listen to men in this society.
Like, when a man tells you something about how they're feeling, and they're like, no, no, no, no, you suck, feminism, blah, blah, blah.
No, he raises some very valid points, and we are going to discuss them.
All that and more today coming up on Candace Owens.
First, I'm just going to present to you a fact.
It is a crazy one.
40% of students across the nation cannot read at a basic level.
Think about that.
40% of students cannot read at a basic level.
Even crazier, amongst low-income fourth grade students, almost 70% of them cannot read at a basic level.
That is absolutely bonkers.
And I would actually argue that even amongst people that can read, they are still somewhat illiterate, at least when it comes to history.
And I think that's ultimately the point of why the state wants people not to be able to read, is because they don't want them to understand their own history, okay?
Just follow me on this, okay?
So yesterday, I get into some trouble.
I feel like I'm always in trouble.
I'm just tweeting, having a good time, sending stuff on X, and people get very upset with me with the ideas that I share.
And yesterday, I wrote this on X. I wrote, the entire field of psychology was built by pedophiles and perverts.
That Sigmund Freud is viewed as anything more than a manipulative sexual pervert who created theories to cover the crimes of his pedophile friends is, quite frankly, stunning to me.
And people came back in the comments and people were like, no, Candace, why would you say that?
Why on earth would you?
He's a wonderful man.
Freud was a wonderful man.
And by the way, I'm not faulting these people because that was definitely my assumption too.
It's one of those fingers that they press in the public education system.
You're supposed to view Sigmund Freud as somebody who contributed so much to the field of psychology and psychiatric care, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Well, guys, that is going to bring me to our first Did You Know.
Did you know that Sigmund Freud was a homosexual man whose best friend was a pedophile?
Okay, you can be upset with me all you want, but that is absolutely a fact, and you should have been able to garner that really just from what he spoke about, what he wrote about.
You can obviously understand the themes of children and sex.
He was obsessed With it almost.
He introduced concepts of children being sexual at birth, psychosexual development theory, the seduction theory, all surrounded around children.
He had a very strange relationship, you can look this up, with his best friend, Wilhelm Fliess, who, if you're interested in Wilhelm Fliess, sexually abused his own son, Robert Fliess.
Now, how do we know this?
Candace, where are you getting this fact that wasn't introduced to me via the public education system?
Well, I want you guys to look up, if you're interested, this scholar.
His name is Dr. Jeffrey Masson, and he was the project director for the Sigmund Freud archives.
He was on pace to become the director.
He decided to learn German so that he could go through all of those Freud archives, and then he was quite disturbed by what he discovered.
He said, wait a second, actually Sigmund Freud is covering up for his pedophile friends.
This is the theory of Masson.
And guess what happened after that?
Masson was dismissed from his role as director altogether.
He was dismissed from a person that was allowed to access the archives anymore, despite the fact that he has a Harvard PhD, he's on Everything Right, just telling the truth seemed like an act that that community was not willing to accept.
And he says, release the archives.
If I'm lying, release all of the archives.
His theory is that when Freud realized, through his work speaking with children, that a lot of them had been sexually assaulted, and that was leading to their various mental disturbances, Freud presented that information to his peers, and his peers got upset.
So imagine you're Sigmund Freud and you go to your peers, all of these other sex pathologists and psychiatrists and psychologists, and you say, hey, just so you know, these kids that I'm seeing, they're disturbed because they were sexually assaulted.
And then his peers were like, no, that can't be what happened.
Among the peers that were upset with his thesis was renowned sex pathologist Richard von Kraft-Eving.
He was also a psychiatrist, of course.
And in case you're interested, he coined the term masochism.
Richard also wrote books.
He was particularly interested in homosexuality.
His book, Psychopathia Sexualis, he published that in 1886, he defined homosexuality as an innate neuropsychopathic disorder, essentially a hereditary nervous disease.
And then he took that diagnosis to advocate for the decriminalization of homosexuality, arguing that homosexuals were not responsible for their malformation and that homosexuality was not contagious.
He also wrote about sex and children, sex with children.
In his book, General Pathology, in Chapter 5, he writes about sex crimes with children and uses the term, actually for the first time, pedophilia erotica.
So, yeah, it's interesting.
And I should also note, because I have a compelling thesis myself, that during this time, yes, homosexuality was criminalized.
It was something that was criminalized all throughout a lot of different countries.
And so you could understand why men that were perhaps homosexual themselves would be perhaps writing theses to say, actually, none of this is a crime.
So what did Freud do after he presents this information and the entire Vienna Psychiatric Society says, no, no, no, no, we don't like this thesis.
And all of his friends are going, mm-mm, this doesn't work.
Well, then Freud does a complete 180, and he starts blaming the children for their memories, positing theories that children were actually sexual by nature.
And then the psychiatric community loved Freud.
They were like, oh my god, you're so amazing.
We're going to put you everywhere.
This is just so contemporary and thoughtful.
It's just groundbreaking.
Yeah.
So, going back to that young gentleman, the Dr. Massone, who was going, hey, I've gone through the archives and this looks pretty bad.
This is a cover-up, actually.
He, after he gets kicked out, decides to publish a book, and you should read it, called The Assault of Truth.
Yeah.
He was also then treated horribly by his peers.
And by the way, this is in the 1980s.
People still were protecting Freud and his legacy.
Like, no, no, no, no, you can't talk about any of this stuff.
Why?
Maybe there's a fear there that the people that created psychology, if you start exposing actually how they were living their lives, maybe the entire field, the psychiatric field, would collapse.
Also, another fun fact before we move on to my question number two, Freud revealed in a letter that his father was also a sexual pervert.
Yes.
He wrote, quote, unfortunately, my own father was one of these perverts and is responsible
for the hysteria of my brother, all of whom's symptoms are identifications and those of
several younger sisters.
End quote.
Now, why is that interesting?
Because yes, that was what Freud started terming.
He said, oh, these children have hysteria.
Anybody that tells you that a sex crime happened to them, they're hysterical.
Yeah.
Interesting.
By the way, it was also psychologists and psychiatric people who created or discovered, however you want to view it, however we're allowed to say it, transgenderism via experiments on children.
If you guys didn't see my colleague's documentary, What is a Woman?, you should absolutely see that as soon as possible.
And Matt Walsh tweeted this in a long thread.
Alfred Kinsey is the godfather of modern, comprehensive sex ed programs.
He came up with many of the theories of sexuality that are now taught As fact in our schools, he also enlisted a pedophile who raped children so that he could document the victims' orgasms.
Again, that is a fact.
Kinsey was lauded by some during his lifetime.
He even made the cover of Time magazine in 1953.
And this is despite the fact that, yes, Kinsey did film sexual acts which included co-workers in the attic of his home as a part of his research.
It was only after his death that the previously ignored aspects of his research came to light that exposed his collaboration with and the protection of serial child sex abusers.
Again, it's a very hush-hush community.
Why is that?
It seems very strange to me.
If I was in any field, I would not be like, oh my gosh, this person, we can't say anything bad about them, especially if they have done things like committed acts of pedophilia or condoned acts of pedophilia.
That seems very strange.
Especially if that someone is Kinsey, who actually detailed cases of extreme, repeated, and prolonged child abuse perpetrated on over 300 children, including infants, that were just two months old, because he wrote extensively to a pedophile and wanted those details.
So, I don't know, it seems a little strange, but this community, I guess, protects their own.
Don't forget about Dr. John Money, by the way.
He was the one who first introduced the idea of changing around parts, right?
When we talk about transgenderism.
By the way, Dr. John Money, I should mention, was also a homosexual man.
And he experimented on twins that he molested.
So he was interested in that experimentation in the same way that Kinsey was, perhaps, interested in that experimentation.
It's just a lot of homosexual men that have an interest in children when you look back into the history of a lot of these modern ideas that we're dealing with.
Which, by the way, brings me to number two on the did-you-know question.
Because this really blew my mind.
Do you know which books the Nazis were burning?
And I'm asking you this, and I'm telling you why it blew my mind, is because definitely something that we covered extensively, and you will cover extensively throughout the public education system, is the Holocaust, Nazi Germany.
It's why so many people, when they're commenting, it seems like the only historical reference they have is, it's just like Hitler, it's literally Nazis.
That obsession with only referring to that historical aspect.
is partially because when you're in a public school system, you really focus on World War II and the Nazis.
So I was shocked that I never learned throughout that schooling that the brown shirts, you know, the student activists that went around burning a bunch of books, were burning books that they deemed to be Marxist and that they deemed to be overtly sexual.
And one of the first and most notorious book burnings was the student-led destruction of the library at the Institute for Sexual Research.
That library was founded by a man named Magnus Hirschfeld, and he was the guy who actually first coined the term transsexual.
In that library, he kept sexually stimulating objects and erotic imagery from non-Europeans.
He was particularly and bizarrely interested in the history of sexuality and its deviations.
In Africa was his focus.
He had a lot of imagery from Africa.
People from African colonies at the time that Germany owned, if you want to refer to a colony, it was a German colony, so to speak.
They were interested in watching Africans have sex and photographing that.
Very weird to me.
Very disgusting to me.
Extremely perverse.
He and some of his peers took a theoretical approach to age-specific attraction as a purported dimension of either psychical hermaphroditism, Or, psychosexual infantilism.
Yeah, so again, you're seeing that concept of children and sex as a psychology.
Here's a picture of Magnus Hirschfeld, the director of the Institute for Sexual Research.
Yes, he was a homosexual, and this is a picture of him at a costume party that he threw at the Institute for Sexual Research in Berlin.
He is the one that is in the glasses, and he is holding hands with his partner, Carl Gies.
By the way, now Magnus is hailed as a hero, or whatever.
And in my view, he's a pervert.
Doesn't mean that his library or his institute should have been burned down.
There's no excuse for burning down an institute.
But we don't then also pretend that somebody that is perverse is somehow a hero.
In my view.
Am I crazy?
Does that turn somebody into a hero?
This brings me to number three, and I think a lot of you may know this, but I don't know how deeply you know this.
Did you know that Margaret Sanger was an avowed eugenicist, that she very much believed in eugenicism at that time?
Essentially, that people that were deemed unfit And at that time, that included ethnic and religious minorities, people with disabilities, people that were just poor, people that they deemed morally defective, as well as LGBTQ individuals at that time.
Yeah, it was sort of this proposition that we should sterilize these people.
We had colonies and we had institutes throughout America, throughout the progressive era, and they were like, we gotta sterilize these people, and therefore the birth control industry was born.
This is an actual quotation from her.
She was concerned with, quote, the gradual suppression, elimination, and eventual extinction of defective stocks, those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.
By the way, challenge yourself to try to find an article that she published in The Thinker in 1923, because they're now wiping the internet.
It's almost like, you know, Men in Black, when they're like, poof!
And you can no longer remember anything.
It's very difficult now.
All of the universities that had her article up, which is entitled, A Better Race Through Birth Control, have mysteriously decided to take it down.
But I'll read you a quotation from it.
Margaret Sanger wrote, the most important problem, barring none, that confronts humanity
today is that of race culture.
It has often been said, and never with more truth than at the present time, that man breeds
his cattle with more intelligence and care than he breeds his own kind.
The draft figures alone should be sufficient to galvanize the human race to action, for
the intelligence tests made on our soldiers during the recent war indicated that approximately
25% of our population never attains a mentality superior to that of a 12-year-old child.
Yep, they kind of just tried to memory wipe that.
It's very weird.
reproduce more rapidly than those of normal intelligence, we may well look into the future with dismay,
unless a halt is called, and that speedily, our race is doomed
to inevitable deterioration.
Yep, they kind of just tried to memory wipe that.
It's very weird.
She also published pieces entitled The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda,
and I have been obsessed in looking into this because I have an entire other series,
and right now we are working on the episodes looking into the history of birth control
and birth control propaganda, And it is wild.
Another fun and really bizarre fact.
There was a man in Germany.
He was Jewish at the time of the Nazi party.
He was a doctor, an OBGYN.
His name is Ernst Grafenberg, okay?
Ernst Grafenberg, by the way, you might know him because you've heard of the G-spot?
Yeah, that's named after him, the Grafenberg.
Spot, so to speak.
And he also developed a form of contraception called the Grafenberg ring.
Today, the IUD, the world's first IUD, was created by him.
Well, essentially, there was this paranoia that people like him, the OBGYN, people that were Jewish who they deemed to be Marxist, were going to, in German society, impact the Aryan race.
And so he had to step down as the head of an OBGYN clinic.
He later on gets arrested for trying to smuggle out stamps in Germany, and he is sentenced to four years in prison.
Now, this part is fascinating.
This is an actual historical fact.
Sentenced to four years in prison, but he only serves two, okay?
I'm not talking about a prison camp.
He literally was in prison.
In 1940, somebody bailed him out of prison.
Which is weird.
Why would, on earth, would the Nazi party agree to allow a Jewish man to get out of prison early?
Well, guess who bailed him out?
Margaret Sanger!
Margaret Sanger bailed him out, brought him to America to open her first birth control clinic.
How on earth did she pull that off?
I don't know.
It was also backed by the sex institute, getting him bailed out and instead sent to America Fascinating part of history that you will never learn in a textbook.
So, of 1, 2, 3, how many of those were you aware of?
Probably none, because I was actually aware of none of them.
And I think that's sort of the point.
They want to control history.
And if you don't know history, you don't even know how to read, then your life becomes just a never-ending present.
It will tell you what to think and how to think.
And that's all I'm going to say about that.
Free should mean exactly that.
Free.
So when you switch to PeerTalk today, you'll get a free Samsung 5G smartphone.
There is no 4-line requirement and no activation fee, just a free Samsung that's built to last with a rugged screen, quick charging battery, and a top-tier data security.
Qualifying plans start at just $35 a month for unlimited talk, text, 15 gigs of data, and a mobile hotspot.
Pure Talk gives you phenomenal coverage on America's most dependable 5G network.
It's the same coverage you know and love, but for half the price of the other guys.
The average family saves almost $1,000 a year.
So I challenge you to choose a company that shares your values.
Let Pure Talk's expert U.S.
customer service team help you make the switch today.
Go to puretalk.com slash owens to claim your eligibility for your free brand new Samsung 5G smartphone and start saving on wireless today.
Again, go to puretalk.com slash owens to switch to my cell phone company.
Okay, now it's time for some Topics Du Jour.
You know, I do not watch junk TV, but I am telling you, I definitely need a reality show
with this family.
So I'm gonna jog your memory.
If you don't know who I'm talking about, because we're not gonna re-show you all the videos that we already showed, go back to Tuesday's episode.
It's entitled, on YouTube, My Childhood Trauma.
And in it, we discuss this back and forth taking place between a daughter, who is a TikTok star, and her father.
So I'll quickly recap.
Daughter gets onto TikTok, And she basically says, share a trauma, because that's a way to get attention, trauma dumping.
And she recounts one from her childhood.
She's pretty happy in it, but obviously she's saying this is a trauma that happened to her, that her dad up and left her and her siblings, so that's four children, and got married, moved to Florida with his new wife very quickly, and then became a breakdancer.
Really interesting narrative.
Obviously, it went viral because that's crazy.
Your dad just left you to become a breakdancer.
He achieved some semi-fame there, which is also weird.
Well, deadbeat dad responded to her, responded to Maddie, and he basically was like, this is completely false.
I actually run an ad agency.
paid the family $10 million because she made this comment that he didn't even pay her medical bills, but here he is breakdancing on TV.
He's like, I gave her $10 million to her mother in today's video, in today's currency, adding for inflation.
And basically you realize that she lied or was deluded by her mother by the end of the video.
So then Maddie does like a part two and she replies and you could tell that she's backing away from her original entertaining aspect.
She seems somewhat upset because his video has gone more viral than hers.
And she's basically like, I don't really know what the financial arrangement was.
Okay, so then why did you call your dad essentially a deadbeat or lead people to believe that
he was a deadbeat?
And also publish his real name.
That's what can't be missed here.
She published his real name.
She even published his breakdancing name.
So of course she knew that he was gonna get heat.
Well, her dad does a part two.
And now you're probably thinking, oh no, dad, pull away.
But I'm actually glad he did this for a couple of reasons.
First, he makes it very clear that when she published her first video, he tried to privately
message her and say, please take this down.
This is obviously going to impact my company.
You're using my name.
And she was like, nah, no, dad.
Sorry, it's going viral.
And so I want to keep it up.
And then he publishes his part basically to clear his name.
And she gets very upset about that.
And I think that that's an important thing to add here because some people were criticizing him.
She also alleges in her second video that the main point that she was trying to make was that he wasn't a part of her lives and she barely saw him.
And he then just drops receipts of him with her throughout her entire childhood.
I mean, he's showing home videos in this video.
And it's a 30-minute video, so we're really going to try to condense it for you so that you get the point.
But take a look-slash-listen.
Okay, so let's roll tape to see what childhood was actually like for my kids.
And let's see how my relationship was with the kids even after the divorce.
We have with us here Maddie Hart.
She is a YouTube specialist.
How many videos, Maddie, do you have on YouTube now?
About 54.
I paid her mom millions of dollars in alimony, child support,
put hundreds of thousands of dollars into the kids' college funds,
paid for their health insurance, of course, and out-of-pocket medical costs,
as I should have.
The result was that the kids were able to live in a wealthy suburb of Chicago, attend top colleges, and pursue very good careers.
Maddie graduated from Northwestern University in 2021.
She asked me for $5,000 to help get her set up in Los Angeles, which I agreed to, against my better judgment.
In addition, her mom and I bought her a used car, a Ford Fiesta.
I also co-signed a lease for her on her apartment.
So that right there, and again, this was a 30-minute video, so it went on and on and on of all of these really precious memories of him and Maddie on various trips throughout her childhood.
It looks like she had a pretty idyllic childhood.
Obviously, we know that at the very least, she had great financial resources because a lot of money was given to her mother to take care of them, and he took her on various trips.
And it just destroys the narrative that he wasn't taking care of her, and it's even more outrageous when you realize that that wasn't a long time ago either.
He's also been recently taking care of Maddie.
He's talking about recently contributing to her having a car, recently giving her cash to go out to Los Angeles to start her life.
So you go, why would she do this?
Why would she, knowing that she has this relationship with her dad and this back and this forth and she's asked him for money and he gives it to her here and there, what would make this young woman still trash him in a video and give his full name knowing that people are going to go after him?
What would inspire that sort of a thing?
Well, her dad has a guess.
Take a listen.
The girls didn't want to validate my wife, Wanda.
We've been married since 2006.
So the girls did not want to come over to the house, even though we were just down the street.
It was a solidarity thing with mom.
Teenage girls can be absolutely brutal, by the way.
Especially on divorced dads.
If you're a divorced dad with young girls, get ready for a rough ride.
My only advice to you?
Be patient.
But also, she had broken up with her boyfriend around this time.
She said she needed to go to grief counseling and therapy.
She and her mom wanted me to pay for that, too.
That's where I drew the line.
Counseling and psychology today are completely dominated by far-left female wogsters.
Almost no males in that profession.
So no doubt her therapist would be telling her the problem was her dad.
The last thing I wanted to pay for was more brainwashing against her dad and against men in general.
So I guess these were the medical bills that I was refusing to cover.
And when you think about it, it really makes no financial sense anymore for males to get married.
It's financial suicide for males to get married today because of the way the legal system is set up.
And the big winners in divorce are the divorce lawyers.
Yes, Maddie was brainwashed against her dad by her mom for 19 years.
That's true.
And this happens in most divorces.
In a divorce situation, the mother is the one who really ends up raising the kids.
It's then the dad's job to provide the money.
That's how it works.
Meanwhile, the mom, the ex-wife, is with the kids almost the entire time, dumping all over the dad, the ex-husband.
And that's the way it works in every divorce that I've seen.
But now there's this other element.
The kids are also being brainwashed into leftist woke insanity by the schools, starting in kindergarten all the way through college and grad school.
Girls in school are taught to hate men, to see themselves as victims of the so-called patriarchy.
I love Maddie to pieces.
I love all my kids.
That's really all I have to say.
So he makes a lot of really interesting points there.
And why it rang to me as true is because he's talking about teenage girls.
And he's exactly right.
I'm one of three sisters.
We're all a year and a half apart.
And it is absolutely true that teenage girls are incredibly difficult.
And you can imagine how that relationship might be complicated by a father getting
remarried, especially if it's a hostile situation, which it clearly is
not a healthy relationship between him and his ex-wife.
There's going to be jealousy.
They are only going to be hearing, or the majority of pain that they're going to be
hearing is from their mother, right?
And this is a theme of divorce that we all know to be true.
We know that when people get divorced, it complicates the relationship with the children who feel like they have to take a side in the divorce.
So there's no question that they are perhaps hearing things about the new wife, right, from their mother.
I could totally see that being true, and I think the majority of people watching this recognize this.
He also goes on to talk about really just the way that men are treated and abused by the court systems.
And this has become a newer red pill movement that I was made aware of actually only recently on a live backstage, that a lot of people are saying, men don't get married, there's no point, 50% of marriages end in divorce.
I will say that's a complicated statistic because a lot of that is people that are getting married in Vegas and are drunk and are like, never mind, I'm going to get divorced.
But people are feeling that because the courts are so disadvantageous to men that there's no reason to get married.
And he also says that they have different politics.
Obviously, his daughter is woke.
She's living in LA, and a lot of her TikTok Feed verifies that her father is conservative, right?
And so you can imagine how even that element has made her somewhat
Dislike him or has added to some of the feelings that she has toward her father
But I really want to talk about this point that he makes about therapy right going back to what we talked about
Earlier on in the monologue is therapy a good thing Is therapy a bad thing?
What is up with psychologists?
Are they actually training people to have a good life?
To have a life that is worth living?
A life that is more valuable?
When you sit down and you talk to a therapist about a breakup, is that going to make you a better person?
Or is it going to make you a person that turns against men altogether?
Right?
Is it going to solidify your stances as a feminist?
I would argue that psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists, that in our society, they are doing more harm than good.
And I would say, historically, that has always been the circumstance.
I don't know.
Point to me the decade since the late 19th century, when psychology took off, right, as its own field, that you feel that they contributed to great things in our society.
That no, yeah, definitely, sitting down and talking to a stranger about your problems, let me show you how that has actually helped society.
I don't think that exists anywhere.
And I do want to say this because I don't want people that have a bad experience in marriage to suddenly become the main voice for what the institution of marriage is.
Part of it is because too many people are choosing the wrong partner.
I don't think it's hard to identify who the right and who the wrong partner is.
People get married for reasons that aren't great.
Right?
They get married because they simply want to have children if they're a woman and they feel like they're running up against the clock.
They get married because what else to do?
We've been dating for 12 years.
It's just the next logical step.
And they aren't actually thinking about what marriage is supposed to be about.
And I think that's because marriage, which used to be something that belonged to the church, has been transferred to the government and the government does not put faith at the forefront of relationships.
You can just have a good time and get drunk in Las Vegas and get married that night because woo!
You're so high, why not?
It's gonna be a great, great night and then you're gonna wake up and have to deal with the consequences of the fact that you went down and got married because you thought it was funny.
And so there is a much longer discussion that we should have about the institution of marriage and what's happening in our society and why it is that so many men are feeling hopeless because the courts, I do believe, get it wrong on divorce.
And I do believe that once you go through a divorce as a man, It can fundamentally change you and your perspectives, but that's not an excuse not to get married.
Marriage is wonderful, and I hope that people that are married and are happy in marriage do more to get that narrative out there.
And like I said, I think the only way that we're going to see changes is by recognizing that what these men are feeling is valid.
It is 100% valid, but the conclusions that are being drawn from those feelings, I believe, are invalid.
So I'll leave you there on that note.
Sleep is the foundation of our mental and physical health.
You need a consistent nighttime routine to function at your very best.
So if you're struggling with sleep, you should check out BEAM.
Other sleep aids can cause next-day grogginess, but DREAM contains a powerful all-natural blend of magnesium, l-theanine, and melatonin to help you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed.
It's not just your run-of-the-mill sleep aid, either.
It's concoction carefully crafted to help you rest without the grogginess that often accompanies other sleep remedies.
Several people on my team use Beam Dream's powder to sleep better through the night and they show up ready to work the next day.
And today, my listeners get a special discount on Beam's Dream Powder, their science-backed healthy hot cocoa for sleep with no added sugar.
Better sleep has never tasted better.
Now available in delicious flavors like cinnamon cocoa, chocolate peanut butter, and mint chip, better sleep has never tasted better.
Just mix Beam Dream into hot water or milk, stir or froth, and enjoy before bedtime.
If you find yourself struggling to sleep, give it a shot.
If you want to try Beam's best-selling Dream Powder, get up to 40% off for a limited time when you go to shopbeam.com slash Candice and use code Candice at checkout.
That's shopbeam.com slash Candice and use code Candice for up to 40% off.
I can't believe we are already up against time, but I'm going to try to read some of your comments regarding Ruby Frankie, the YouTuber we discussed yesterday, again on the topic of therapy and counseling.
This is a woman that was in marriage counseling with a woman that clearly has some issues and was telling her that abusing her kids makes sense and that it's good.
Van Max writes, Ruby Frankie is playing victim, fake remorse for a lower sentence.
I think if she challenged the charges, more dark evil truths and abuse accusations would come out, and that's what she's afraid of.
I also believe she was having a lesbian relationship with Jodi Hildebrandt or something explicit that she doesn't want to come out to public.
She will also try to control the children through visitation and make them feel guilty for her being in prison.
I hope she had had a genuine awakening for the sake of her children, but I hope her kids never let her back into their lives.
You might be right.
I don't know.
I just thought it was interesting.
And here's what I will say.
No matter what, it does make you think, how could this person at all, speaking of Jodi Hildebrandt, be qualified to be counseling?
How could you ever be qualified to be a marriage counselor?
And that, I guess, is the bigger point.
Kind of thought she was being sincere.
Maybe it was just me hoping that she was being sincere, but you could absolutely be right.
Further to that point, Underground Living writes, Of course, it's possible she's being manipulated, but I pray that she is sincere.
connections to other brainwashing going on and so many are believing. Of course
it's possible she is being manipulated but I pray that she is sincere. We should
all acknowledge our own potential for doing evil. So if we ever cross a line we
shouldn't cross, we correct it instead of diluting ourselves into thinking our
actions are right or justified.
Yes, and I think that is what was somewhat refreshing, was that she just owned it and that she didn't take her kids through the court process and that she said, put me in jail.
We just never see that because we now have a society which is basically always and constantly trying to decriminalize.
Right?
Everything you do can be understood through the lens of this or that.
It's why I believe that psychology is garbage.
That is my position on it.
It is absolute garbage.
It's always been garbage, ladies and gentlemen.
And I hope that's your main takeaway on today's episode.
Do you know what big tech and big government have in common?
They both want to silence any dissenting voices into submission.
If you talk about something they don't like on social media, well, the chances are that your post will be flagged by a content moderator, and you might end up on some kind of government watch list.
To fight back against having your voice censored by both Big Tech and Big Government, I recommend ExpressVPN.
In order to censor you, Big Tech has to be able to track everything that you do online.
They track what you're searching for, the videos you watch, and everything that you click.
They can then match your activity to your true identity using your device's unique IP address.
When I use ExpressVPN, they can't see my IP address at all.
My identity becomes anonymized by a secure VPN server.
Plus, ExpressVPN encrypts 100% of my internet data for protection from hackers and eavesdroppers.
ExpressVPN is by far the best VPN that I've tried.
It's the VPN rated number one by Business Insider and countless other tech publications.
What I love most about ExpressVPN is that it couldn't be easier to use.
The app has one button, you tap it, and you're protected.
It's that simple.
Stop letting your voice be censored.
Defend your rights and protect yourself at ExpressVPN.com slash Candace.
That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash Candace to get three months free.
I agree with you.
These should be an hour long.
But then I would be agreeing with you that these episodes being an hour long would mean that I would have to work longer.
And so, no, I don't agree with you.
But ladies and gentlemen, that unfortunately is all the time that we have for today.