THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 38 — Operation: Nebraska? Is Women's Basketball Legit? Euthanasia For The Young?
In this week’s ThoughtCrime, Charlie Kirk, Jack Posobiec, Tyler Bowyer, and Blake Neff dig into several critical questions, including: -Will Nebraska do what's needed to win the 2024 election? -Will AI songs replace all musical artists? -Should young people be allowed to euthanize themselves for depression? Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Thought Crime Saturday00:01:27
Hey, everybody.
Thought crime Saturday.
Blake Neff, Tyler Boyer, Jack Pasobic.
Join us.
Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Subscribe to our podcast by opening up your podcast application and typing in Charlie Kirk Show.
Get involved with Turning Point USA, the nation's most important organization, at tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
Start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
Early Voting Manipulation00:08:28
All right.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to tonight's edition of Thought Crime.
We've got an extra spicy episode for you tonight.
So spicy Charlie's not here.
So spicy.
Charlie is not here.
Charlie is off conducting struggle sessions.
But of course, when I say conducting struggle sessions, I don't mean he's the one on struggle sessions.
I mean he's the one putting people on struggle sessions.
More on that later, but we've got a lot to get into tonight.
And for now, Blake and Tyler are here.
What's up, Blackpill, Blake?
Oh, we're just going to be blackpilling everyone all night and also white pilling everyone.
But, you know, most news is bad news.
We should all despair and accept our inevitable demise.
We're going to be blackpilling all the media matters guys that are listening in here today.
Wait, no, no, no.
Tyler, welcome in, Media Matters.
You're not Blackpill at all.
No, I'm a Tyler's like a big positivity company.
He's Tyler Times now.
He's teal pill.
New York Times, Tyler.
New York Times did a massive, what's up with this?
Did a massive spread on Tyler this week, and he's like up leading, you know, conducting the forces.
Can you can you explain yourself, sir?
Yeah, I mean, it was a bad picture of me, but whatever.
It's fine.
I'll take it.
There's no good pictures of it.
Yo, real quick, where was your hair in that picture?
Like, you're not like Blake, who just doesn't have hair to begin with, but you have generally longer hair.
And like, it was like this.
Yeah, you were Blake and it was like this.
And like, I was wearing this shirt that was probably a little bit too tight.
And, you know, it's just like it.
So ignore that part if you see the New York Times article.
But I think all in all, it was pretty good highlighting the work that we're doing right now on getting ballot chasers into the field in Arizona.
And this is what's freaking out.
So what's ballot chasing?
What does that mean?
Yeah.
So we're, and this is really critical.
You know, we've had this discussion about early voting, why early voting matters.
Who should early vote?
You know, the big thing that Turning Point Action is really focused on is getting more ballots in the ballot box.
Yeah.
Real quick while we do this, bring up my screen here.
We have this hot box.
Let's not.
Let's not.
Oh, no.
Terrible.
Now all of our viewers are blind.
Terrible.
That's how it is.
Horrible.
No, it's not.
I was trying to.
See, Blake, I was trying to spare Tyler the indignity of the photo, but no, the New York Times did the New York Times thing and they wanted to, you know, put a put a not great photo up, but that's fine.
That's okay.
Because the message of early, early voting and early balloting is out there.
The message of early voting is if you vote early, you don't have to stand in line with anyone and you don't need to maybe stand next to Tyler Bowen.
Or like what happened in Wisconsin this week on election day where there's a blizzard.
What happened in Wisconsin on election day?
There was a blizzard and on election day this week on Tuesday.
And that's always a problem.
So, but you know, our big focus is we want to get out early votes, particularly with low propensity voters.
So a big question that people have talked about a lot: well, I like voting on election day.
Do I need to change the simple answer is no, as long as you vote, right?
Yeah.
What I always like to emphasize for this is if you plan to vote early and you forget, you can still vote on election day.
Yes.
But if you want to vote on election day and you forget, you forget.
You get sick.
You have a family emergency.
A blizzard hits.
A blizzard hits.
The power, any number of things that can go wrong.
You have a work emergency.
You have to go out of town.
You can't go back in time and vote early.
And I think in the big picture, it is correct.
We are right to be suspicious of mail-in ballots.
Where I think a lot of people go astray is, I don't think the problem with mail-in ballots, to be honest, is that they'll see your envelope and steal it and change the vote.
And if they have the capacity to do that, they can probably do a lot of other problems on elections.
We don't have time to get into all the reasons why people are suspicious of early voting.
However, the most frank and honest argument against everybody early voting is that the Democrats will just fund more chasing to outperform us if we give them a number to hit, right?
That's that just makes sense, right?
Like if you're in a basketball game, which we'll get to, right?
If you're Caitlin Clark, right, and you're hitting a bunch of threes early in the game, they're going to know how much they have to make that up.
And so they're going to change their game plan for that.
That makes sense, right?
That is just a fundamental thing.
But they're going to do that anyway.
They're going to do that anyway.
And the only answer to that, even in that case, is still, you still have to do it.
More votes.
Because it puts you in this.
Right.
So because it puts you basically in this prisoner's dilemma of, well, if I don't do it and they don't do it, then I'm okay.
But if I don't do it and they do it, then I'm screwed.
But I have no leverage over them not doing it.
So I must do it as well.
And that's, and that's it.
That's actually it.
So, you know, you can put up the Punnett square of that or whatever.
But we distilled this earlier, you know, and we've been doing the slogan, vote early, win early.
Just vote early, win early.
That's it.
Well, and you just, you just said something which is really important, which is leverage.
If you throw the kitchen sink at the left, even for those that are the most cynical about the entire process and after seeing the last few elections, with a lot of problems, a lot of rules changed, to be honest, in a lot of these places, if you throw the kitchen sink at the left, you're more likely to make them have to think, rethink their game plan, and you're going to have to make them work harder to win.
Another good reason to do it, everyone who votes, you've probably had the annoying experience of getting contacted by people asking you if you've voted or making sure you've cast your ballot.
They're doing this because they have a list of people who have voted.
That is updated.
Public information.
That's public information.
And they're going to nag you all the way because they have to, you know, turn out, get your vote up.
If you vote, they'll stop doing that.
Most of them will.
Yeah.
And that not only makes it less annoying for you, that means every second that we spend nagging a person to vote who was going to vote anyway is sort of a waste of time, a waste of effort for us.
Whereas let's say hypothetically, everyone who's a 100% voter voted at the very first day of early voting.
Then all your resources, all your effort are spent on marginal votes, people who might not be voting.
And on election day, when we have vans and we're like, let's do turnout, we're not driving anyone to the polls who was going to vote anyway.
We're only driving those people we tracked down who are favorable to us, but our marginal voters often don't vote.
It's just statistical analysis, right?
Which is you get more out of the things that you expect least, right?
So if you're able to have something happen that is not likely to happen, it makes it harder for your opponent to be able to strategize against it.
But that's worth more to you.
By a one-for-one, you know, early vote than a later vote doesn't buy you a whole lot.
It buys you some confidence, right?
But it doesn't buy you anything new.
What the left has figured out, and this is the simple, the layman's way of explaining it, is that all of these independents who are becoming honestly more conservative, millennials are becoming more conservative.
Independents right now, like Trump is polling, I think, 10, 15 points ahead in some of these polls with independents.
They can cancel out all those votes if they can make sure that some left-wing lunatic who never votes, they can turn out that person's ballot.
And so our side has to look at this and go, we just got to turn out a right-wing low-propensity vote to cancel out the left-wing vote that they're chasing to cancel out the independent that they're chasing.
Does that make sense?
So like that's for our side, it's we've got to do this work to match.
It's not everything.
There's still a number of things that we have to keep an eye on.
There's a ton of manipulation happening.
But by throwing the kitchen sink, like Jack said, you are creating a new layer of leverage that allows us to win.
And it's really critical.
And that's worth it.
Even if you have to have photos of every awful photo that they put on the front page of the New York Times.
The Nebraska Map Strategy00:14:44
That's 10,000 miles.
So speaking of throwing the kitchen sink, it's almost like, oh, I don't know.
Throwing threes, if you will.
Well, actually, we're going to get to that later.
We're going to get to Charlie just walked in.
Oh, there's someone here.
Oh, Charlie has arrived.
He's arrived and everything.
Before we get to that side, Charlie was held up because he had to get a hat.
He was actually removing husks off corn.
That's right.
I have become a corn husker.
How does a hat look, everybody?
It is a beautiful thing to bring.
Can we tighten the hat?
I can't see.
Oh, there it is.
Yeah.
We got to get a tight shot on that.
It's my Nebraska Corn Husker hat.
Yes.
We're all in on the Cornhusker gambit, man.
We have a lot of new listeners from Nebraska this week.
I think that our downloads have really increased in the great state of Nebraska.
Yeah, there it is.
You know, they won a national title.
You got to check me.
1970, 1971, 19, I want to say 84, and then 1995 and 1997.
I'm very positive that one of those championships.
Am I right, Blake?
70, 71, 457.
Yep.
And they won a rose.
All five of those?
Yeah, I said, yeah, 84, right?
94, 94.
No, I thought there was one of the, there's five of them.
They have an unclaimed national title in 82 and 83.
Yeah, that's right.
Yeah.
Is that the one where they did the fumble rooski and the Orange Bowl?
And then they lost to Miami.
Yeah.
Well, the unclaimed one, I think, is because there was two separate bowls because they didn't have a playoff back then and they were multiple defeated teams.
Don't we just love how college football makes perfect sense?
Not that just like college football.
It still doesn't make sense.
Just like college football doesn't make perfect sense, though.
For anyone who's not following the intense, the big story this week in politics, our show basically set off a volcano and now we're getting write-ups in the Washington Post.
Oh, everywhere.
ABC, the Guardian, just London people noticing this.
So wait, wait, wait.
You guys launched this and like, I was like, you were doing this on Charlie's show.
And then all of a sudden, like, I'm getting ready for my show.
And I get blown up.
And everybody's like, what's all the Nebraska?
I'm like, the Nebraska.
What's everybody's talking about in Nebraska?
Walk me through how you numbskulls like launched this.
You like set the entire state of Nebraska on fire in the country.
Like on a Tuesday.
So here's the truth.
I remember a couple of thought crimes ago.
I came in and I asked Tyler about it.
And you're like, yeah, I don't know.
It's kind of dead.
And at the time, it kind of was.
No, it is dead.
It was dead.
It was dead.
I was like, okay.
This is an effort.
Wait, what is it?
What is this?
Let's say Nebraska has no idea what we're talking about.
Well, I've done this like 15 times this week.
But Nebraska does their electoral votes based by congressional district.
So Omaha has become liberal throughout the years.
So Joe Biden is almost guaranteed to get an extra electoral vote in the state of Nebraska because they don't go win or take all like 48 other states do.
Maine does something similar.
And so we, so anyway, that's the context.
It could be changed by the legislature.
So then we're prepping for the show on Tuesday.
It was during the show even.
We were just laying out on the show.
We were talking about RFK's impact on the race and how the polls are close.
And what I did is I went to Real Clear Politics and I looked at the latest polls for each of the battleground states and I just pasted it and it showed Trump up in most of the states and then a few were tied.
And I think in Wisconsin, Biden was ahead.
And I said, if Biden wins all the states here that he's up or tied, he wins 270 to 268.
And then this is what I threw in.
I said, or it could be a 269 tie and go to the house if Nebraska gets off its butt and changes its law where they give Democrats a free electoral vote.
That is true.
And then Charlie's as part of this, wait, tweet that.
And so I go and I look it up.
And so we whip out, we pump out a tweet and put it online.
And we're just looking at it.
And there's a bill that's in the legislature that's all stalled out for some reason.
And a lot of work went into, you know, getting the bill there.
And it's just kind of stalled out.
No momentum, nothing.
And they've had four years to do this.
Well, this has been, this was, this has been discussed for now numerous cycles.
Now, there's a greater context than Nebraska.
Nebraska has been a fairly moderate state from a Republican standpoint.
So they haven't wanted to touch this in a while.
Now, the more conservative state party leadership has said, this is the most obvious thing that we should be doing.
And they've been talking about this nonstop for the last three years.
And so the conservative state party leadership that's there now, we've been working with and having Eric Underwood on quite a bit onto the show and talking with him quite a bit.
Now, Charlie's now best friends with Eric on techs with everything.
So I'm in the weeds here.
In the weeds.
So it just kind of was like perfect timing.
It was perfect storm.
And so we do this thing.
We do a segment.
So I had this whole show mapped out.
And the show was we were going to do three reasons why the Democrats are not doing well.
Right.
And all of a sudden, I do a segment on the Nebraska thing.
And the audience is loving it.
So then I do another five minutes on the Nebraska thing and it turns into 10 minutes and it turns into like 20 minutes.
And the whole show ends up being about Nebraska.
And we sent out a tweet being like, hey, you know, Governor Pillan, do you want to, you know, do something about this?
And he came out five hours later.
It was like, I support this.
Then President Trump comes out is, I support this.
This thing just comes to life out of nowhere.
And it can be done.
I mean, and I want to emphasize how important this is because just so many people don't seem to fully realize this.
So let's bring up my computer screen here.
So this is 2702win.com.
So named because we all know we have the Electoral College.
You need 270 electoral votes to win.
Keep it up, please.
And so, this is the map that we had if we maintain what we had in 2016 or 2020.
And so, there's been some changes to the values because we had a census.
So, for example, Montana's worth four now.
It was worth three.
Texas is 40 instead of 38, stuff like that.
And so, this was the map as it was then.
So, let's say we take back Georgia, we take back Arizona.
We're still down here.
Now, let's say we take Nevada, where Trump is polling ahead right now.
This is the key.
Those are the three states that we are polling consistently ahead in.
Rust Belt State, sometimes we're ahead, sometimes we're down.
It's close.
Those three states were consistently ahead.
If you look up here, if those are the three we switch, Democrats 270, Republicans, 268.
That's because there's this one vote in Nebraska that went for Biden in 2020.
And if it goes that way again, they'll have it.
Now, if we make this not the case, if we made it so Nebraska was winner-take-all, it's 269, 269.
And if it's a tie, it goes to the House of Representatives.
Each state House delegation gets one vote.
You do ballots until someone wins.
With the current House setup, that would be a Republican win.
And even if we lose the House, odds are quite good.
It would still be a Republican win because California's got a million Democrats, but there's still only one vote.
That's true.
Well, and there's two keys here that you have to be focused on.
One is that if Nebraska does this, not only does it change potentially the outcome of the worst case scenario on election day, but it changes how the Democrats have to campaign, right?
Because if Nebraska does this, it makes Nevada more important to Republicans, right?
And I'm not saying this.
We love Segal Chata.
We love Mike.
We love all our people, Jim.
In most scenarios right now, Nevada is just not useless.
It either means we fall just short or we're already spilling over.
Like we have.
Nevada is usually like a nice to have thing that is something where Republicans will put up some effort, but it's not usually crucial.
Well, there's two things here, right?
So remember, there's not Nevada's not a populated state.
It's not a highly populated state, smaller than all the other swing states.
And then the second part is you have Maine too, which is really not populated, right?
So if Nebraska does this, what this does is it forces the Democrats to have to win Maine as a total.
They have to spend money in Maine that they don't want to spend, that already they could potentially lose because Trump's so popular in Maine too.
That's one.
Two is Nevada where they have all the workers, everything with all the unions, but now they're going to have to spend exorbitant amounts of money when Republicans don't care about Nevada because now all of a sudden Republicans are going to go, you know what?
Nevada is a lot easier to win for us than Wisconsin.
So maybe we'll go all in on Nevada or all in on Nevada and Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin.
And it screws up everything for the Democrats.
This is the reason why Nebraska matters so much to this conversation and we know it.
If you don't do this in Nevada, not only could you potentially lose by one electoral college vote because they'll put everything into Maine.
And I don't have the faith that we, the Republican Party, can survive World War III in Maine too.
Well, the thing about Maine, yeah, I mean, if they were to try to respond and change their rules in Maine, there's like a ballot signature.
So I checked into this.
So this is the amazing thing.
So this is how this could get really exciting really quick.
So let's say we get Nebraska.
Don't even get us into the procedural issues we're running into.
We'll elaborate on that.
I don't even know if that's worth talking about.
It's not worth it.
It's more fun to talk about this.
We'll do that on the show tomorrow.
We'll assume we motivate these people and we get this past.
Here's the essence.
If they want to get it done, they can get it done.
That's it.
People want to get it done.
So if they want it enough, they get this done.
And currently, we don't know.
Obvious retaliation if we get this out of Nebraska is that in Maine, that's controlled by Democrats right now.
They would introduce same thing.
They would get rid of their non-winner-take-all system.
And so we'd have all 50 states winner-take-all.
They would cancel out.
But here's the fun part.
Both of these states, both Maine and Nebraska, allow voters to collect signatures to challenge a law passed by the legislature and say, we need to have the public vote on this.
A lot of states have this.
And in both of them, what you can do is if you gather enough signatures, you can delay the implementation of the law until it's been approved by voters.
You can just pause it and say this law doesn't take effect.
But I checked the exact amounts.
In Maine, you need to get a number of signatures equal to 10% of the vote in the last gubernatorial election.
So I think in Maine, that would work out to about 68,000 votes.
I think they had about 600-some thousand votes.
They have an off-year election cycle.
So 10% of the votes in the gubernatorial election to delay the law.
That's an easier threshold to hit.
And that would be what we'd want to do because we're trying to keep an electoral vote.
In Nebraska, you need 10% of all registered voters, which is a much bigger pool of people.
It's probably about twice as big, I would guess.
And for them to be able to delay the implementation.
So we could conceivably have it where we would be able to, even if they both passed this law, we could have ours be going into effect consistently, whereas theirs would get delayed one election cycle.
And by the way, our Maine people have said that's never going to happen because even the Republicans in Maine want to keep it.
Democrats in Maine, it's a historical thing they want to keep it.
So I still think that, and I'm just thinking about that person who's in, you know, listening out there that's like, okay, this all sounds interesting and very exciting, but so what?
You know, Nebraska, Maine, we're not talking about major states here, talking about one vote here, one vote there.
Why does one electoral college vote in Nebraska matter so much?
I mean, the 1877 presidential election with Rutherford B. Hayes is decided by one electoral vote.
Yeah.
And as we said, it's two, if we had those three states flip, it's 270 to 268 right now versus 269, 269 if we have this.
And if we assume Republicans can win a House election, which is not a sure thing, but more than 50% chance, we're basically looking at whether we do this or not might be the difference in whether we win the 2024 election.
Or just because of how it affects the map, flipping that one electoral vote is literally like winning one additional state just there.
Yes.
Yet Omaha, it's like we won a free extra state in this election.
And what it does too, it shifts your entire strategy.
So it creates what we were calling this earlier, the Sunbelt strategy.
So you pick up.
You've got Nevada.
Now you've got now you've got Nevada, boom, which has been trending our way because of this Hispanic swing that we're seeing.
I'm not saying that I feel safe about Nevada.
And we can fix this.
We can fix this if we all want to.
It's as simple as that.
Now, Donald Trump and the Republicans can get to 269, 269 just with the Sun Belt and not even any of the Rust Belt states outside.
So that means the Democrats have to defend.
Well, yeah, I mean, the swing Rust Belt states.
The blue wall.
The Democrats have to defend every single one of them.
And all Trump has to do is win one.
Can I add this real quick?
Huge.
The reason why this matters so much too, on top of that, and I get we've repeated this again.
We should just pull this map up because I think it's versus the Sunbelt strategy for our side.
Our side is not as prepared, right?
The left has had a coordinated strategy to reinstate the blue wall because of this knowledge that they're so they're they're planning on competing for cd2 because they want that congressional vote.
It's an easy thing for them, right?
Because you can't leave this off the map too.
That congressional vote is an easy, I mean, we have a really tight, narrow Congress right now.
CD2 in Nebraska is winnable for them, so they're already putting in resources there.
So we're just giving them free reign to spend $10 million plus dollars to win a congressional seat plus an electoral college vote.
But this jibes perfectly with their blue wall strategy.
What this does that's why it's so that's why they're freaking out at the level there.
We have some tape too.
I want to play.
It throws absolute chaos into this track.
This is the power of our program and the power of all what we're doing here.
Because look, you could tell if we were onto something based on their reaction.
If we do this and all of a sudden it was met with, oh, who cares?
Okay, then it's a nice thing.
No, no, no.
All of a sudden, they woke up the next morning on MSNBC the next morning.
I don't know what we have up on screen there.
We have like a picture in picture there or something.
They wanted me to have the map up.
Okay, let's let me try to find this piece of tape here.
Okay, it is cut one.
Rumble Cloud Services00:04:41
This is, it takes away Biden's best path to victory.
It's that simple.
Play cut 59.
So, Jim, it is never too early to talk about 270, the magic number.
And there's some development.
Let's talk about the map.
Yeah, let's talk about the map for a second because there's a buzzing about certain about Nebraska right now.
The governor there has thrown his support behind an effort that would no longer allocate the electoral votes by congressional district.
Because right now, it's five votes there.
Technically, Republicans get four, and President Biden, Democrats get the one from Omaha.
That's right.
If that changes, and we don't know that it will, the state legislature is going to look at it.
But if that changes, that takes away Biden's best path to win.
Because if you get, if he wins, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, but loses the other swing states and no longer picks up the one in Nebraska, 269.
That leads playbook this morning.
The alarm among Democrats that this is possible.
Leeds playbook.
Let me just say, it's not just possible.
I'm not going to get into any inside baseball.
Number one, I'd bore you to death.
Number two, it's changing real time.
Number three, I'm not going to divulge any strategy because that's not the way you win.
Let me just tell you the essence.
I just tweeted this out.
After over six hours of calls and texts with countless people in Nebraska over the last 48 hours, here is the takeaway.
If lawmakers want to get it done, it can be done.
There is a very clear path to make Nebraska winner-take-all.
If it doesn't happen, it's because there wasn't enough will to win.
It's that simple.
I've gone through every parliamentarian argument you could imagine, right?
Blake, let's not reveal any of the stuff.
We won't reveal the strategy, but I want to get to the we're not calling for anything unconstitutional, anything legal, anything unprecedented.
Let's just be clear: we're not calling for anything even remotely to what the Democrats did in 2020, where they contorted election law to do goofy stuff, right?
We're talking about like letter of the law by the book.
It might require a couple extra hours of work.
Yeah.
This is totally doable.
We're talking nothing more extreme than what Republicans did to get Gorsuch on the Supreme Court.
Let me just emphasize: I went deep into this stuff today and I walked away with there's a clear path.
Can I just say something?
It's laughable on MSNBC.
They're talking about, oh my gosh, they're trying to change rules in an election year.
Guys, we are literally many, many moons out here from the election.
First off, this doesn't even fall within the Supreme Court initiated rule, which is really within the months before the election.
But let's just rewind back to 2020 when Democrats were trying to force everyone to vote by mail within the last few weeks before the election, and all the courts in all these different states had to strike it down.
The ruling question is the one almost every state follows.
Exactly.
It's not like it'd be one thing if we were trying to go to a state that currently was winner-take-all and make them go.
That would be not at least not doing dangerous stuff with the system.
It'd be illegal, but this is just like, hey, like in Nevada, if we try to do that in Nevada right now, right?
Which we don't even have the political power to do that or whatever.
But all right, I want to tell you guys about Rumble Cloud.
I do want to talk more about Nebraska in a second.
I want to emphasize this point because I think the will to win has been the takeaway.
I hope it's there.
I know it's there with the Nebraska grassroots.
I know it's there with the people of Nebraska.
I know it's there with the governor and the senator.
And I want to make sure it's there with the lawmakers.
I pray.
Are you getting tired of a surprise when you see your cloud services bill every month?
Well, our friends at Rumble have done it again.
The new Rumble Cloud Services are coming this spring.
Rumble has successfully built the cloud for the parallel economy.
The disruptive Rumble Cloud pricing model will blow away the big tech clouds with big savings and more predictable budgeting.
And with Rumble Video, you don't have to worry about cancellation on Rumble Cloud.
Remember what happened to Parler?
Exclusively for our friends of Rumble.
Sign up today at friends.rumble.cloud and receive 30% off the first three months of your cloud compute subscription, which will be available for purchase later this quarter.
Rumble Cloud Services are the essential cloud services you need for any size business to innovate and grow.
Head to friends.rumble.cloud and sign up today.
That is friends.rumble.cloud.
So I just want to, this is, you know, this is hard for me to explain because I've been, I mean, texting like crazy.
And I, I explained, somebody called me.
They said, Charlie, what do you mean that some of them don't have the will to win?
Who wants to take that?
I'll take it.
I mean, I've been talking with the Nebraska GOP guys for some time.
Faithless Elector Scenarios00:14:33
And, you know, we have Fanchon that's there and Eric.
But I mean, look, they described it really well.
And we had some of this problem in Arizona where we had a very establishment Republican-held state for many years that didn't want to rock the boat.
They didn't want to do things that would ultimately long-term benefit the Republican Party because even though they had a trifecta in their state and all the political capital in the world to expend and everything else, it was more about just being liked with lobbyists and being liked with people who are, you know, very establishment governors who are doing these deals in the background with Democrats and everything else.
And that's what you have going on.
We all know that.
That's the uniparty stuff that we talk about that drives people crazy.
And to be fair, Donald Trump is the art of the deal, guys.
So there's deals and then there's defending America.
There's deals and then there's defending the Republican Party and making sure your state is in good hands for another generation.
And I think part of the issue is that people are now seeing through this very particular lens that's been brought up with this issue is that, oh my gosh, these people in Nebraska who claim to be Republicans are not focused on saving the country.
And this is like the part that, you know, we don't have to get into this, but what if we lose 270 to 268?
What if we lose by one electoral college vote?
What does that mean?
Well, you know, we've got a really great couple of Supreme Court justices that are conservative who are probably not going to be able to last another four years and we can't expect that.
Or they might even pass in office because they're too old, right?
That means that we could lose the Supreme Court if we have another four years of Joe Biden.
They could add two more states in DC and Puerto Rico.
They could pack the Supreme Court.
They could use all these different things that we will legitimately lose the country for an entire generation, all because of potentially one electoral college vote.
Even if that's a 0.0001% chance, you have to act.
And so, again, the will has to be there when you have the vision of like, well, what's the worst that could possibly happen?
And how realistic, what's the likelihood it could happen?
This is not a like, oh, well, this is a crazy thing.
What Blake has seen is something that people, political scientists have been looking at for many years.
This is a real possibility.
And what's also a real possibility is what the Dems will do if they get total control of the country.
It is, it's very eye-opening, but it could look.
Here's the thing: this thing was dead.
We've already seen a lot of these lawmakers that were against it flip.
So this thing could be flipped even more.
And it just takes the will.
You know, some people say, oh, you know, we've tried our best.
And hold on.
No, no, no, no.
There is so much that could be done.
And we'll just leave it at that.
Well, I'll say this, Charlie.
Can you imagine if you were a legislator in Nebraska?
And by the way, like Charlie said, there's so many people stepping up to do the right thing.
Finally, if the 11th hour, whatever, there's a perfect storm that's going to happen with this week.
And we were kind of laughing about it earlier, but it really couldn't have happened a month ago.
And it may not have happened at all had Trump not become the nominee as early as he did.
But we won't get into all those different things.
But can you imagine if they do nothing and that and that 1%, 5%?
If we lose by one electoral vote after we could have fixed this, I think it's not just possible.
The polling shows that's probable.
It's the polling.
It is probably, I don't want to say it's probable in the sense that it's over 50%.
It might be the most likely single outcome of this election right now.
Yes, I totally agree.
The most likely outcome based on all publicly available polling is this.
And let's talk about why.
The Rust Belt has declining populations with loose voting laws that are tilting down.
Democrat governments, Democrat governments.
And the Rust Belt was taken by surprise in 2016, and they have like a huge infrastructure.
The Sun Belt, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, Nevada have increasing populations of right-wingers moving to their states.
Totally.
Right?
We have revitalized state parties, and we have the ballot chasing in Arizona, and Nevada is out for revenge.
So the Sun Belt is different than the Rust Belt.
So holy moly, you run the math.
It just so happens you're catching lightning in the bottom.
Another reason is polls indicate Hispanics are moving to the right.
We're catching all those in Nevada.
There are very few of those in the Rust Belt.
Very few.
Very few.
And so you have Nevada, you have Arizona, Texas, which won't be a problem.
Georgia, which I think is going to course correct.
And so it's, it's, like, I want you to emphasize again, based on data, it's the most likely outcome right now.
Exactly.
If you, it's not, we're not saying this will happen.
We're not saying this happens a majority of the time.
But if you imagine we run this election, let's run the election 10,000 times.
The scenario where Trump flips Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and no other states is probably the one that will appear the most often.
And then in that scenario, right now, with Nevada as it is, we lose Joe Biden's president.
And if you change that to Nevada, not Nebraska, if we change Nebraska to the system we want, Trump basically Trump would win.
And here's the thing: if you get to 269 tie, the president has enough tails that the House would be Republican.
So meaning that that new House would not be, even if it's a Democrat House, it'd be close enough.
I think it's the pre-existing one.
No, I think because it's the current one.
It's the current seat of the House.
The House goes over January 3rd.
It is get seated.
It's seated.
Oh, it's the new seated house.
Well, because here's what happens.
And they do it immediately.
So I thought there was an argument over there.
So, well, on January 6th of the 2025, ah, he said it.
Well, it's just the date that it's going to happen on, right?
It's the first Tuesday.
Oh, he's going to say it again.
Okay, well, let's see.
Is it actually that date?
Let me see.
I thought the congressional members get seated.
January.
Okay, it's actually constitutionally.
It's actually January 8th, I think, this year.
But because I think Congress begins on January 3rd.
No, I know.
I'm looking at the calendar.
So January 3rd, whatever date it is where they count the votes, they're going to bring it in, and whoever oversees it, which will be Kamala Harris at the time, will say, okay, we have a deadlock tie at 269, and we'll know this going into it.
Unless there's faithless electors, which we have to, you know, think about.
That could happen.
That can happen.
That's a thing, right?
So 269, 269, and all of a sudden the House will then convene into little pockets.
And at that point, I still think the president of the Senate, Kamala Harris, is overseeing the procedure.
I don't think it's a Speaker Johnson thing, but the House is the new House at that point.
The House votes.
So it's the new.
My delegation.
Yeah, it's the new House.
It's not the old House.
So whatever we do at the House.
So to give you an idea, Harriet Hageman from Wyoming would have the same amount of vote as the entire California delegation, 55 members.
And that just makes so much chaos.
Anyone who's from one of those one-person states, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont on the other side, Delaware, Rhode Island, Rhode Island, I think, lost theirs.
But I think that if every red state.
Alaska's a Democrat now.
Let's flip that back.
Oh, that's interesting.
Well, so if you look at the numbers, because you break down the numbers, we would still be fine even with Alaska being right now.
We win with the 24-7.
I think we would win with the 24th.
We'd win with the current.
So then it gets really fun.
The Senate selects the vice president.
And the Democrats have that.
And it's in the new senators.
But hold on.
If Trump were to get to a 269 tie, it's reasonable to think that we'll win West Virginia and we'll probably either win Maryland, Ohio, or Montana.
Hogan is up like eight points in Maryland.
He's raising a lot of establishment money.
Would Hogan want Trump's VP?
Hogan could be the kind of guy.
I can just see so much chaos stuff.
Imagine you have, imagine the Democrats worry about, and you have like one faithless elector because they're saying that they outlawed faithless electors.
I don't know if that's true, though.
But not every state's done it.
Not every state has done it.
So imagine we have one faithless elector for vice president.
Just go with this.
The guy willing to go to jail for this.
One person does a faithless vote for vice president.
You pick from the top three under the 12th Amendment for both offices.
And if you have no president chosen, the vice president.
Well, we would know that ahead of time because the Electoral College meets in December and then the electoral votes are brought to, but the Congress doesn't vote until that point.
No, that's right.
No, so we would know ahead of time.
We would know.
So let's say someone does this where they throw out a gambit and they do one faithless vote for vice president for someone, making them eligible to be picked in the Senate.
And then you have Democrats and Republicans collude to have this person chosen as vice president, and then someone deadlocks the president vote.
Yeah, the president vote happens first, I think.
I think the president vote happens first.
The president vote happens first.
Yeah.
Kamala Harrison decides she's not going to be able to do that.
I think he can possibly deadlock it.
So Kamala Harris would preside over her own potential appointment as vice president.
Let's go wilder.
What if someone does it for president itself?
Because you need the majority.
So let's say it was 269, 269.
You could have a Biden vote, vote for someone else, and it wouldn't guarantee a Trump win.
And then you have a third candidate.
Let's say someone goes, I pick Mitt Romney.
Do you guys see how important Nebraska is?
I pick Mitt Romney for president.
And then suddenly delegations can vote for him.
But it can't, but that's only if it's the top three votes.
Exactly.
But if you have one faithless elector.
No, it has to be one.
It has to be the top three vote.
Top three voters.
We only have two vote getters normally.
I think it's more likely that you'd have a faithless elector for Kennedy.
So maybe.
So then let's combine all of that together.
What does it mean?
It means that if we flip the Senate, we could end up getting our VP of choice.
The House, I don't think that they would defect on Trump.
The House is more conservative.
I think they would.
They're more accountable to primaries because it's every two years.
So I think the House would stay pretty strong.
Yeah, there's no Senate.
The Senate cuts deals, man.
Like this.
Now, if Shay wins in Montana and flips that tester seat, and Justice will vote fine because he likes Trump and their buddies, you get to 51 votes as the Senate.
You get to decide the vice president of the United States.
But I can't remember how it works because the split states would vote against each other.
So those you mean the House?
No, it's for the VP vote.
What do you mean?
Oh, for the Senate.
No, that's, I think, no, no, every senator gets a vote.
Every senate gets a vote.
Yeah, it's not every state.
So they don't do it by delegation for the VP.
I don't think it's possible because you have split states.
Right.
Is that correct, Blake?
Sorry.
Think about it.
It's not by delegation for the Senate.
So think about a state like Maine where you have Susan Collins.
Oh, yeah.
The senators vote individually.
That's what I think.
Only the House votes.
The House votes collectively as each state.
Okay, that's what I thought.
So people are saying, well, what does all this mean?
Nebraska.
Nebraska.
That's it.
And Maine.
And Maine too.
They're coming for you next.
If this thing happens in Nebraska.
They won't.
We'll put up a fight.
That's what I'm saying.
If this thing happens in Nebraska, where we get it back to winner take all, that's fantastic.
But you have to know in Maine, if you live in Maine, too, like World War III is happening in your backyard.
So let me just, again, I want to just close with this and then we'll get to the other topics.
Tuesday, we're going to Nebraska, which I think our event is now more important than we could have ever imagined.
It's huge.
If you live nearby, please attend.
We need people.
We want to max out attendance.
It's in Omaha at the Lord of Hosts Church.
We're doing it at church.
It is Nebraska, after all.
So, and it's at 7 p.m.
We've invited the governor.
We've invited the legislatures, legislators, I should say.
I've tweeted out the information.
You guys could check it out at tpaction.com/slash rally.
Bring a friend.
We want a huge turnout.
That's tpaction.com/slash rally.
Lord of Hosts Church in Omaha, Nebraska this coming Tuesday.
All right.
Now, Kansas City, Sioux Falls.
You're in driving range.
Yes.
However, happy to have our out-of-state friends.
We want this to be Nebraska-centric.
You're right, Jack.
But we really want to send a message of CD2.
Yeah, we want to get the most Nebraskans in a room possible.
Now, this cause is so important.
Can I get someone?
I'll tell you the link real quick: tpaction.com/slash rally, tpaction.com/slash rally, tpaction.com/slash rally.
Go register right now.
This cause is so important that we already got someone to make a musical pitch for what needs to happen.
Is that right?
It's true.
So let's play.
Oliver Anthony wrote a song about it.
Basically, let's play 100.
It's like his younger brother, actually, or excuse me.
In the heartland of America, where the sun sets on the plains, there's a state called Nebraska where a change is long overdue.
We've been splitting our votes, torn apart by our choice.
But it's time to come together and let our voices rejoice.
No more dividing lines, no more electoral divide.
We need a winner, take all for the good of our pride.
Every vote should count.
Every voice should be heard.
Let's unite as one.
Let's spread the word.
Nebraska.
Switch to winner, take all, and let democracy.
I'm not making it up.
So the podcast here, we did that.
There's a new AI machine that can make songs about a minute long.
Don't say the name.
Don't say the name.
I won't say it because it'll shut up.
Can I ask you a question?
I'm not kidding.
The Omaha to Lincoln, Carney to Scottsbluff.
The AI came up with that.
Can I?
And how long did it take?
Oh, it takes like 20 seconds.
Can we get a rap version together that says that we're going to eject Nebraska from the union if they don't do this and we lose?
We're kidding.
No, we're not even going to be able to do that.
That's going to be aggressive.
I love Nebraska.
I'm wearing the hat.
Listen to me right now.
If we lose by one electoral college one.
Let's just stay positive.
It's going to have positive.
Basketball Player Development00:11:03
I'm not positive.
I'm just saying.
If there will be no country left in this.
I want to.
Then we go country in our country.
Let's make sure they know that.
We need you guys.
We need Nebraska to do the right thing.
The Democrats will ban country music.
They will.
Charlie might too, but he's not running for president.
This is why AI should get on the rap.
For, you know, if what happens if that song is, I got to play that on the show tomorrow.
Oh, yeah.
Well, we've got it.
We've got it ready to go.
All right.
Let's get to other topics here and start to commit some thought crimes.
All righty, for sure, for sure.
Okay.
Time for a thought crime topic.
Is women's basketball a real sport, Charlie?
I'll say I was, I'm a, yes, yes, it is.
But I'm a skeptic, I was a skeptic of Caitlin Clark.
I'm a big basketball fan.
I was like, all right, what is all this hype?
What is all this nonsense?
Because I thought it was an op.
And I am a very, very strict grader.
She can ball, man.
She's very, very good.
Now, is she good against men?
Probably not.
But no, I'm saying like if she had to compete against like other college men, but there's difference between men and women.
She's really talented and impressive under pressure.
Like the amount of pressure.
Here's what I respect about her.
She's selling on arenas.
She's like player of the year.
She lost national title last year.
She's Midwestern work ethic.
She's like works her tail off.
They have ads that they're running non-stop for her.
And she still performs at a high elite level.
Here's a stat to blow you up.
I think she's great.
It was in the Elite Eight game against LSU this on Monday night.
Yes, LSU.
They're a bunch of bumps.
12.3 million people watched on ESPN.
Wow.
That is more than all but one game in the NBA finals last year.
And it's more than the final game of the World Series.
Yeah.
And just so you guys understand, Caitlin Clark shoots 44% from the field.
That's unbelievable.
All right.
That's also like, Blake, that's also like 50 times more people than watch all of the RNC debates combined.
That's true.
So I was like, okay, what is this op?
Like, what are they pushing?
All I see is they're pushing.
They're pushing this like wholesome, like really sweet, hardworking Midwesterner that was just is really good at basketball.
Like, I actually think for once there's an op where there isn't an agenda.
And it's kind of funny.
And I'm kind of like supportive of it.
It's kind of funny because you kind of think of like really aggressively pushing women's sports.
Maybe a little bit, you know, left-wing coded.
Yes.
But the places that like women's sports the most are actually often sort of conservative, rural, Midwestern states.
That's where it's really taken off.
Here's a crazy fact.
Like Nebraska, in Nebraska, for example, they fill up, I think Nebraska's women's volleyball team, they can fill up like a 60,000 person arena to watch that.
They filled up the entire Husker Stadium for the largest volleyball event.
They broke a record.
They broke the Guinness World Book record.
It was like 111,000 people.
Yeah, just turn in.
And what's kind of great is it actually is a perfect pairing because if you, a lot of places, they're not going to consistently compete in like men's basketball where there's like established powers.
But if you really want to, you can carve out, you know, and be a consistent title contender in volleyball, in badminton, in some of these secondary sports.
And that's pretty neat, I suppose.
No, I just, I hope she wins the national title.
I know nothing about her politics or any of that, but I just, she is someone that I, under pressure, you average 32 points a game and you shoot 46% from the field with a lot of people thinking that you're going to choke.
It's pretty risky.
People are complaining that there have been not like thought crimes this episode.
So I'm just going to do a drive-by on everyone.
Basketball is a lame sport.
Okay.
How could you say such?
What do you mean?
What's the definition of lame?
Okay, first of all, too much sporing.
Do you like soccer?
One, one.
Yes, too much sporing.
So you like scoring.
No, you know what would make basketball perfect?
Is if a higher rim.
No, if you made them all play on ice and you turned the ball into like a rubber object and they could hit it.
I can't, of course, I can't play basketball.
Well, you don't like basketball.
Here's the thing.
Something like 20% of people who are seven foot tall or more play in the NBA.
I hate that.
That means NBA is like just a height sport to a skill title.
I have had more blood, sweat, and tears drawn.
I played a lot of sports.
I grew up playing every sport like a lot of American kids.
You play soccer, you play baseball, you play basketball.
I was the worst at basketball.
The worst.
I played other sports better.
I wasn't that great at some other sports.
I played lacrosse.
I played everything.
I've had the most fond memories, straight up American memories with my dad playing in front of our house on the hoop, with my son playing horse.
I've got more fights with kids at school playing and all that.
There's no, we got in this argument.
There's no more American sport because it started here in America and it's now invented by a Canadian.
A Canadian American.
Oh, no.
See, that was not invented by Kansas.
Basketball is the most American sport.
Naismith was a Canadian?
He was a professor.
No, Naismith was in Kansas.
He was a Canadian American.
It was at Kansas.
Where was he born?
He's right.
He was born in Kansas.
In Al Monte.
But he province of Canada.
But it was on the American continent, Blake.
Didn't Naismith invent it in Kansas?
I believe he invented it as well as a modern game.
Springfield, Massachusetts.
But he said he had some.
It was supposed to be like a new team.
He was founded.
He was supposed to be like a basketball program.
He's their only head coach with a losing record.
Even though he's the one that invented basketball.
Yes.
He has a losing record as Kansas basketball coach.
But here's my argument is that basketball is not actually a modern game.
Those are just modern rules to a very ancient game.
And you can find ancient, and Blake, you and I were chatting about this the other day off air, like ancient Mesoamerican ball game, which includes a court, which includes a giant ring and a ball that is thrown into the ring that have been around for like thousands of years.
And the Mayans used to play this game.
And we have pretty strong evidence, by the way, and the courts are still there.
You can go visit them when you visit these things, Chijinita.
It's all there.
And we have pretty strong evidence that rituals were also part of the competitions.
And human sacrifice at one point was part of the games as well.
I would support basketball a lot more if the losing team or the winning team, we're actually not sure with those ancient Mayan ball teams.
It's actually not killed.
Which side?
They did that with Lake Cross.
Lay cross to the gods.
If you I would support basketball more if we did that.
But no, here's the problem with basketball.
One, they score too much.
Like if you watch ESPN highlights, yes, but not in a football game, like in a football game, the most exciting play might be in the first quarter because there's an amazing deep pass or an interception or a kickoff return.
In basketball, if you watch the highlights, it's always just like, oh, and then he does a sick junk, and it's worth the same amount as so many other people.
You have no respect for the beauty of the game.
No, I don't.
There you go.
You have no respect for the little parts of basketball from crossing somebody else or a beautiful cut or, you know, a steal.
Well, it leads us to a two or three point score.
But it doesn't matter.
There's too much scoring.
It's too low.
So you must be like a, again, like a massive soccer or golf fan.
I don't like soccer either because soccer goes too far the other way, where a 0-0 tie is too common.
The best sport is football.
Football is clearly the best sport.
Football is better for football.
They score, you know, football is like the closest thing we have to like a simulation of war where it's like pure brutal compact contact compact, but also contact, but also like a lot of strategy and a lot of plans.
It's the difference between warfare, like, you know, in the interesting way boys like to read about, basketball is war in the sense like you're two tribes from New Guinea who are like, you send your five big men, we send our big men, and they like just fight and then one of them wins.
No, that's not that exciting.
Just because you're tall doesn't mean you win.
It's not true.
Muggsy Bogs.
Okay, name another short player.
Steve Nash wasn't that short.
Steve Nash is like Steph Curry is not tall.
I'm taller than Steph Curry.
Yeah.
Steve Nash was like six foot, six one.
Rayjon Rondo, Kyrie Irving.
And that's on the program.
He's like actually six.
I'm probably taller than Michael Jordan.
I don't think, isn't he 6'6 ⁇ ?
He's like 6'6 ⁇ .
I think he's like a rounded program.
He's like a rounded up six.
Now he's like 6'3.
Yeah, 6'6 ⁇ officially.
That's a rounded up 6'0.
LeBron is 6'9.
LeBron's definitely.
You don't need to be seven foot tall, but the number of Muggsy Bogses in the world.
Yeah, Jalen Brunson went to St. Pretty small.
They might have even just kept his career going so he could be in Space Jam.
I mean, it's definitely changed in the recent years, but I will say this: is that, and this is really important, another important point.
I like basketball because if you watched entire seasons, it's right in between football and baseball.
The one thing I hate about football, I hate, is it's like one shot, it's like one loss elimination during the playoffs in most cases.
And you have such few games that you're not actually, it's kind of like it's a little bit more of a Russian roulette season.
That's exactly what's so beautiful about it.
You never want to miss an NFL game or a college game.
No, baseball's too much.
Baseball is annoying because basketball, they literally pass rules to stop teams from just sitting their players because the regular season matters so little.
NBA, I think, is awful, unless it's the playoffs.
College basketball is legitimately a beautiful sport in the month of March.
College basketball now is all messed up because we have the transfer portal.
That's not nice.
You get drafted after one season.
No one's at their school for more than a year.
So?
It's lame.
That's lame.
You think that if you go to a school and a coach leaves, it should just be a death sentence?
Well, I just think it should be.
Oh, sorry.
You're stuck at.
I think it's lame that we have this fiction that these people represent their schools as student half-hold on a second when they're just mercenaries who show up for one year.
The SEC player of the year is a guy by the name of Dalton Connect.
He was an average player at university, Northern Colorado, average.
And all of a sudden he popped up to like six foot six, worked his tail off, transfers to Tennessee, SEC player, has a chance to go to the NBA.
If he said Northern Colorado, the other guy, the guy that worked, played for Oakland, he's at Hillsdale, D2, transfers to Oakland, crushes like 18 threes against Kentucky.
I think the transfer portal is great for kids that want to be.
Do you think it's going to be great if we eventually have this?
Now we can pay players where we have a guy, he starts D2, then he goes to a lower D1, and then someone offers him 300K to play for us next year at, let's say, Alabama, goes to Alabama, then he does even better, and he stays for a senior.
Pays him a million dollars to play at Duke, and he's a different school every single year.
Euthanasia Ethics Debate00:11:11
That's silly.
Why is that?
Hold on, but why are we having taxpayer-funded institutions?
Let's look at what the old model was even worse.
You know what it was?
The best players left after one year, and John Calapari would just recruit the best guys and they'd leave, rinse, and repeat.
Now you have to like build a roster.
You have transfers that can come in as a junior.
It's much more into player development.
I would make an argument that the portal is better for basketball than football.
Football, I agree.
Football, it's a disaster.
It's like a mess right now.
Football is outrageous.
I think basketball is actually.
I think who's more upset about football because you're a bigger football fan.
So you realize, you realize cosmically how stupid this is.
If every player is in Oregon winning a national title, it's a great thing.
If not, burn it down.
Go big red.
Someone says I'm a monster truck kind of guy, and they're kind of right.
Monster trucks are cool.
What's next?
This is a crazy story.
Out of the Netherlands, a physical from the New York Post.
A physically healthy 28-year-old Dutch woman has decided to legally end her life.
Has she done it yet?
Not yet, I believe.
Well, if she's listening, don't do this.
She struggles with crippling depression, autism, and borderline personality disorder, she says.
She lives, she says she's in love with her boyfriend and her two cats.
40-year-old boyfriend.
40 year old boyfriends, two cats.
I have a real question.
Has someone checked her vitamin D level?
I mean, Netherlands doesn't get a lot of sun, and low vitamin D levels leads to higher depression.
I mean, has someone like scanned her brain to see that if she had a traumatic brain injury?
She says doctors told her, quote, there's nothing more we can do for you.
That is never going to get BS.
First of all, like conventional doctors sometimes aren't the solution.
Like there's 500 different ways.
By the way, I'm not a huge fan of it, but there's amazing data to show that ketamine can really help depression.
A lot of people like ketamine treatment that could be done intravenously.
I hate this attitude.
Just give up at age 28 because you're depressed.
What I really wonder is: can you imagine how much of a drag this woman must be?
No, no, but let's talk about it.
I can just say the doctor is just like, look, woman, you're still complaining.
It's probably never going to get any better.
And now they have, now they have this legal out where they can just say, have you considered the suicide pod?
That was my point, which is it's the psychiatrist that should be put in prison.
Like, who is this person that just gives up on their patient?
Why don't you just kill yourself?
Like, you're annoying me.
This is genuine.
To being entirely serious, this is why I think euthanasia has a huge problem with it.
We are normalized.
That's not how you sound like.
Can we fix that?
No, it is because it's young people.
Oh.
It's a play of words.
It's also a mega death.
It's a play of words.
And anyway, it's oh man, you lost my train.
No, we're creating death as a viable treatment for people.
They're doing this in Canada.
We're doing this where, okay, we've gone from you are a sick person that we desire to help to sort of you're a you know, it's like a maintenance ticket we've received, like make the problem go away.
And then you can do that by curing them or just, you know, shuffle them into the social media.
So I don't know what I hate more, the fact that she's doing this or the warm media reaction to it.
I mean, if you read these headlines, News 18, 28-year-old Dutch woman to legally end her life in May.
This is her story.
So wait a second.
In May, why are you waiting?
Like, I mean, you want like a whole media cycle before you do this?
This is so perverse.
This is so twisted.
There's so many Instagram followers for this.
But it's just, and by the way, the Netherlands just legalized euthanasia in 2001.
I think there was the first one.
This is all Dr. Kvorkian stuff.
And for a doctor to say there's nothing I could do for you, resign.
Have you tried every treatment under the sun?
Or have you just tried like SSRIs and benzodiazepans and Prozac or Zolof?
And by the way, Jack, we know this, right?
If you have meaningful relationships, regular diet and exercise improvements, increase your vitamin D levels.
In fact, that stuff has been proven to be more effective than antidepressants.
Yet this doctor's just giving up on her.
Yep.
Charlie, you and I were chatting about this the other day.
Charlie's big on the vitamin D stuff.
I went for a vitamin D IV just last week and found a place that was right near us.
I pulled up the price.
I was like, oh, that's actually a lot better than it.
See, this really got big during COVID, and the price was pretty high.
And a lot of it's become more normalized.
A lot of it comes down.
I don't drink.
There's a lot of people who do these for hangovers and different things like that.
But it's just so easy.
And this is not something that any doctor is ever going to suggest you go for.
No one's going to say, go exercise, go spend more time outside, go take some nutrition, go take your vitamins.
You'll never hear that.
Why?
Because part of it is because they get paid more based on the amount of prescriptions they write.
But the other part of it is that, and Charlie, you know about this as well, that they're not trained to do anything else.
They're only trained a certain way in the medical schools to teach to the medicine.
Yes.
I mean, and they go straight to the literature and they say the literature shows SSRIs, benzos.
And if that doesn't work with a little bit of maybe therapy, why don't you just kill yourself?
How defeat is this is so twisted?
It is.
It's really, and every single warning sign of how the slippery slope could happen if you do this has all come true.
So it starts off with this will only be for old people who are terminally ill.
Yes.
And then it becomes, oh, you're not warned against people.
And then it says, oh, well, some people are just suffering mentally a lot.
And then eventually you start getting into, do we really need to ask their permission for it?
Every single horror case you can heard of, you've heard of has already happened in the Netherlands.
We've had cases where they've done it to kids.
We've had cases where they've done it without actually asking their permission, including ones where they just think, you know, the patient, we really think the patient would have wanted this, but it would have really troubled them to ask.
You take people who already have a God complex, which is medical professionals, and you've literally said, well, you know what MD stands for.
Yeah.
Minor deity.
Yeah.
You know, you know what the joke they say is the difference between surgeons and God?
The surgeons charge.
God doesn't go around thinking he's a surgeon.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Well, there's a bigger play here, too, which is, again, we saw all the documentation when Agenda 21 came out many, many years ago about lowering populations.
We see what's happening in Europe or Europe.
European populations have significantly declined.
And you just have to expect that euthanasia has always been this like dream of the left and those that want to limit population growth.
It's remarkable.
And if they'll do that to their own population in the Netherlands, guess what they'll do to you?
But like, who are these people that all of a sudden, so that you read the article, she says, I want to die without any music sitting on my couch.
Who are the people that just show up?
Hey, we're here.
We're here from the euthanasia department for the government of Netherlands.
How are you today?
Like, what sort of greeting do you give when you're like, hey, oh, yes, we're about to murder you.
How's it going?
Get in the pod, please.
Or let's take your blood pressure.
Like, why would you have to take your blood pressure?
You're about to kill them.
Like, what is like, what do you do with why do they sterilize the needles?
Yeah, I mean, exactly.
What, how sick you must be?
Yes.
Like, what, by the way, you, this would torment you.
I would think if you're like a professional euthanasia person and you go to people's homes and you just murder them for a living.
Oh, yeah, today I did five, you know, heart-stopping IVs.
It was a great day at work, honey.
It's horrible.
I think it's the idea.
Like, if you, if you showed up in a costume or something and you're like, you're pretending to be something else, oh, I'm here just to check the meter.
And you, you know, you go in, you go, it's like, aha, I just tricked you.
And then popped in with the syringe or something.
You're like, oh, yes, it was me.
Today's the day.
Because that way it's like you're not doing it yourself.
That way it gives people like a way out and they could say, oh, well, you know, I'm not doing it because I don't know what they.
This is insane.
Like, it's so insane to even that we even have conversations.
Like, it sounds like a Saturday Night Live sketch or like a really weird body fight.
There's a former Dutch prime minister, Dries van.
I can't pronounce this.
It all sounds like you're vomiting.
That's right.
So this Dutch prime minister and his wife, just a month ago, or two months ago, early February, they did euthanasia together.
Are you serious?
They just timed it.
They're like, oh, let's just die together.
And then they just took their pill and died.
What is this cult of death?
Charlie brought up something.
I mean, I've been through, you know, putting a dog down, which is an awful experience.
It is horrible.
Yes, it is like, I don't wish that upon anybody.
It sticks with you.
Yes.
Like, I would rather my dog just die naturally 100%.
Without me being there.
That was like one of the worst things ever.
But people, they say, like, oh, no, it's so much better for your dog today.
It sticks with you.
It doesn't uplift you.
It makes you feel awful.
I agree.
People, people that swan, like this beautiful experience.
I said, you're a six-man being if you thought it's beautiful to kill your dog.
It is horrible.
And they do that.
They come in and they sit next to you and you watch your dog die and you'll never forget it.
And I just can't imagine, like you said, I can't imagine doing that with another human being that you know, I think we should for a living.
But first of all, we should hope that this girl changes her mind.
Okay.
You don't have to go through with it, young lady, just because there's all these articles.
You can change your mind.
Okay.
Number two, shame on the Netherlands for allowing this.
Like, I don't want to hear that modernity is this like wonderful thing.
If we're allowing like widespread euthanasia of otherwise healthy 28-year-olds, she doesn't have a tumor.
And you know, what an insult to the people that are fighting like stage four cancer right now.
Like right now, there are millions of people on the planet that have like really bad diagnoses that have to fight with pain.
And she's like, I have depression.
I'm just going to murder myself.
And why do you have to have the clinic do it?
And I just think of how this empowers so many bad people.
Because think about toxic families where you'll have people pressuring someone to off themselves because they want their money or they just want them out of the way.
And there's just, there's so many ways you could just have bad people exploit this to get rid of people that they don't care for.
And doctors, of course, to exercise whatever God complex they want.
And it's very, it feels, just feels very twisted.
How would you know?
You know, in some situations.
I mean, in this case, it doesn't even seem to be like illegal.
You know, they don't, as long as it just seems to be that the person has to consent to it.
And if they're consenting to it for the wrong reasons, I don't know that anyone can decide that.
Well, maybe they let doctors do it because they apparently just think these doctors are gods.
But just to remind her, National Suicide Prevention Hotline is 1-800-273-8255 or go to suicidepreventionlifeline.org if you need help.
So reach out.
AI Generated Lyrics00:05:41
Is there a final topic?
Our final topic is: you think we were going to make just one AI song about Nebraska?
Charlie, we have a very special song that we want to play.
Let's play.
Let's play song 101.
We'll gather around up.
There's a force to be heard.
Charlie Kirk's his name spreading.
Yes.
You had to do it in country.
Yes.
Hilariously, I could see us playing this in like the house music before Ampes.
We will.
You know what I mean?
I'm sending it to Lauren already.
I'm already sending it to Lauren.
Gotta send it to Lauren.
We'll practice it next week.
I will.
Next America Fest, I want the live fans playing.
It does make you wonder how many of the songs the last 10 years were written using some form of AI.
Because this is like, this sounds like the noise that most country music is.
Right?
I mean, it's like indecipherable.
I mean, most artists don't even write their own music anymore.
If I sent this to you and I said, oh, I had hired some man to do this, would you have any idea?
No.
No way.
No.
Let's turn the time.
It's almost done.
We're playing the voice.
By the way, when I did this, I think literally all I wrote was upbeat country song about Charlie Kirk and Turning Point.
That's it.
That's all I wrote.
I didn't.
So here's what's amazing too about it.
It generates the lyrics.
And I didn't write anything about like youth organization or freedom or conservatism or any of that stuff.
It went in all by itself and I guess scoured the interweb.
It's so creepy.
Right?
Scoured the interwebs to find everything about Charlie Kirk and put this all together with backing vocals and a drum track and all of it in a style that I asked for.
And it did this in less than two minutes.
Can I say the same thing that I've seen with this, let me just say that this is the first time I've seen AI and been like, okay, this is indistinguishable from magic.
What if it would have grabbed like the entire Media Matters RSS feed?
I'm surprised it didn't, honestly.
We're going to use AI to fuel a drive towards early vote.
Oh, wait.
Oh, play 103.
Yes.
I hate this.
I hate this more than New York Times pictures.
I'm rocking on him.
I'm talking about here.
Like an anthem.
The phone drops.
This makes me feel like.
Tyler.
So, my daughters watch absolute junk of Netflix that has filled in songs like this.
Now I'm realizing every song that they have in these stupid cartoons is all AI generated.
That's all they do.
Pretty much.
This is like that Barney song that's popular now.
Yeah, you can.
So you guys know, you can go in and add your own lyric.
You can generate lyrics or you can actually have it sing your, you know, your lyrics however you want.
I just want to be clear.
Just in case anyone couldn't tell, that was a song about our friend Tyler here.
The opening verse was Tyler Boyer is the hero in our town.
And then it ends, Tyler's voice guides us.
Our spirits never compromise.
All right, guys, till next week.
Wait, we're not going to play Black Pill Blake?
Oh, we got to play.
No, we're going to play Black Pill Blake.
Man and Mystery Post now.
Because I made a song all from my best friend.
Blake Shivik.
Oh, there's some rap.
Of course, they made it.
Wait, this is incredible.
I can't sing in less than two minutes.
Two minutes.
That's the moves I make.
They say life's a game.
Well, I'm playing the win.
But you gotta get to the chorus.
Here we go.
No sugar, no sweets.
You're gonna be at the turning point, Jim.
Like tomorrow.
We could probably make this go really high up on the chart.
My words cut deep like a blade.
They're violence.
How funny would that be if we just AI generated something every week and got it to be number one and just like destroyed the charts?
But that's kind of what the thought crime here, I guess, is this AI music.
This is going to be like the great replacement.
But for like the knowledge economy, the music industry's done.
Musicians are screwed.
Voice actors are screwed.
Pundits and AI Music00:00:49
Yep.
Lawyers are screwed.
That's what I'm saying.
We can just break the rankings every week and we just do an AI generated.
The only people who are protected are right-wing pundits.
That's because AI is not allowed to.
I know.
And you're against their ethics.
I have the greatest job protection of any person out there.
Rachel Maddow.
Especially this week, Charlie.
That's right.
Exactly.
All right, guys.
God bless.
See you in Omaha on Tuesday.
And till next week, keep committing thought crimes.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening, and God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk dot com.