The Bravery of Riley Gaines with Riley Gaines and Jack Posobiec
No organization in America is attacked more than TPUSA, and right now no TPUSA voice is more targeted than pro-women, anti-fake women activist Riley Gaines. Riley herself joins Charlie to give an in-depth account of her harrowing experience last Friday in San Francisco, and deliver her promise to keep speaking no matter how many threats and punches are thrown her way. Plus, Jack Posobiec breaks down signs of a possible war between Taiwan and China, and explains the case of Daniel Perry, who faces life in prison for defending himself from a BLM radical pointing an AK-47 in his face.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Resupplying Taiwan in Kinetic War00:08:43
Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk show.
Riley Gaines herself joins us after she was attacked at San Francisco State University and she talks about her next plans.
Pretty amazing and chilling details that we discuss.
And then we have Jack Pesobic to discuss China and also a case in Texas that will get your attention.
Email us freedom at charliekirk.com.
Buckle up everybody here.
We go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at AndrewandTodd.com.
Jack Pesobic is with us.
Jack, welcome.
Lots to cover.
What is going on right now with Taiwan and China?
Phyllis in.
Yeah, Charlie.
So what you're seeing right now, and we've been covering this on Human Events Daily quite a bit, is essentially a naval standoff between the Chinese Navy.
You're seeing Taiwanese warships out there.
The United States, USS Nimitz aircraft carrier battle group is just off the coast of Taiwan.
Also, the Chinese aircraft carrier, the Shandong, is also off the coast of Taiwan at this very time.
So you're seeing a huge, as well as the Koreans, the Japanese, their respective naval fleets are in the area.
So this is a complete envelopment of Taiwan Island.
This is a standoff right now.
Now, we will see, Charlie, we will see as to whether all of it comes on the heels of Speaker McCarthy meeting with President Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan.
And we'll see, of course, whether or not this comes to a fruition moment as to whether or not actual barrages take place or actual shots are fired.
We've had some close, close calls between the U.S. and Taiwan before vis-à-vis the Taiwanese Strait that I've sailed through when I was in the Navy, but I've been to Taiwan many times, obviously, was spent two years in China.
But this is probably the closest that I've ever seen the U.S. and China go to blows over Taiwan Island.
So let me ask you, Jack, do you think a kinetic invasion of Taiwan is imminent?
Because a lot of people are speculating that, but it's far from an easy military maneuver.
It's a serious island with significant terrain issues.
Do you think we're seeing the kind of overtures towards that, or is that largely bluster?
What are your thoughts?
No, Charlie, I don't think so right now because I think what you're going to see more along the lines of, keep in mind that Taiwan's unique, not unique, I mean, it's an island, right?
So it's an island off the coast of China.
Truman had this famous quote that if the U.S. ever wanted to invade China, it would essentially be a floating aircraft carrier for us, a physical aircraft carrier.
But Taiwan is not Ukraine.
China can't just march into there, but also on the back end, were there to be a kinetic war with Taiwan and the U.S. gets involved, we would also not be able to resupply Taiwan the way that we are able to with Ukraine.
There's no physical border between Taiwan and, you know, of course, you know, Ukraine has the back door with Poland and Hungary.
We can't do that in Taiwan.
Essentially, Charlie, what you would see is not necessarily an amphibious assault, which of course would be very bloody.
I mean, go look at the history of island hopping, the campaigns in World War II, some of the more the bloodiest days of the war in the Pacific took place there taking those islands, even the invasion of Guam, Iwo Jima, et cetera, et cetera.
And so when you're looking at this, most effectively, you'd see a blockade by the Chinese military, People's Liberation Army Navy around Taiwan.
It would prevent the resupply.
Charlie, their food is imported.
85% of Taiwan's energy supplies. are imported, completely imported to that island.
So if you don't need to fire a shot and win, you're following Sun Tzu's most famous adage.
And of course, the Chinese military all read Sun Tzu when they're going through the academy.
This is exactly what they want.
They'll sit there and say, we will envelop you.
We will blockade you.
We will not allow any supplies to come to the site.
And Charlie, what they're going to do is they'll go around to every maritime shipping company in the world and say, your ships are not allowed in here, or they have to be, they will be interdicted by Chinese military vessels.
Charlie, they're not going to be able to get the insurance to do that.
Swiss Re is not going to be coming in with the reinsurance.
Those captains, because the captains are all unionized now, they're not going to come out and say we want to run a Chinese military blockade.
What are they going to do?
The chambers of commerce around the world, and you're already starting to see this with the World Economic Forum's whipping boy, Emmanuel Racron, over there in Beijing saying, you know, we really don't need this.
We really need to make sure that we maintain.
He says we shouldn't be dependent on America, which is amazing.
Europe shouldn't be dependent on America.
But he doesn't call out the point that he's making Europe dependent on China.
And Charlie, I guess what I would have to say in response to Emmanuel Macron is that it shouldn't surprise us that the French were the first to surrender to China.
So, I mean, the Taiwan issue seems correct.
I mean, just from the CCP's perspective, they really think they're going to dominate Taiwan.
I mean, they have a different culture.
They don't care for the CCP.
What's their end game with Taiwan?
Well, so the endgame with Taiwan is similar to what you saw in Hong Kong, right?
So Charlie, you could have said the exact same thing about Hong Kong 50 years ago, that Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau never became part of the Chinese Communist Party or the People's Republic, I should say.
So the CCP never took power there.
But what they did with Hong Kong was a slow assimilation, which was gradual, gradual, gradual.
And then sudden, right in December of 2019, just days before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, before all the lockdowns came in, that's when the freedom fighters were going out because it looked like the CCP was taking full control of Hong Kong.
Eventually they did.
The protests were shut down by the lockdown procedures and history has already been written in that case.
They're trying to do the exact same thing with Taiwan.
They want to slowly envelop it, slowly assimilate it, isolate them from the world economy, isolate them from world diplomacy.
This began back in the 1970s when they got the United States and the United Nations to switch diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China, which is the government of Taiwan, the official government of Taiwan, to the CCP so that their vote at the United Nations Security Council Went from Taiwan being in control of that vote to Beijing being in control of that vote.
And they've continued to economically and diplomatically and even socially isolate Taiwan Island from the rest of the world in order to make them only able to do business with mainland China.
They were able to do so in all but one industry, that, of course, being semiconductors and superconductors in order for them to fully take over that industry, which, Charlie, if the CCP were able to do that, right?
And this is a huge difference between Taiwan and Ukraine.
Again, for those people looking at the real politic of all of it, to say, look, if China gets access to those semiconductor prefab sites, and I know there's one even with a Taiwanese company that's looking to potentially put up sticks and open a prefab facility right there in Phoenix, Arizona, where you are, that this would give the CCP control over just about every device that's out there.
It doesn't, at that point, it won't matter that if you've got TikTok or whatever app you've got downloaded on your phone, they've already got your phone from the actual hardware level.
The spyware, the monitoring would be absolutely worldwide because they'd have the chipset inside your own hardware by the time that the device actually gets to you, whether it be a laptop or a phone or an F-150.
They've all got chips in them these days.
So that is the big prize.
About a minute I have remaining.
Explain the significance between Brazil and China no longer using the dollar for exchanges.
Well, Charlie, what it shows is that the U.S. can't just walk around the world poking their finger in everybody's chest and saying this is how it's going to be now.
Perry Claims Barrel Moved Up00:05:00
No, other countries are saying they're sick of the United States.
They're sick of this foreign policy, which has been largely outsourced to people like Victoria Newland, who should be arrested, not Donald Trump.
And we have seen an absolute relative diminishment of the United States's power and influence compared to the relative rise of BRICS.
Jack, what is the story with Daniel Perry?
Who is Daniel Perry and why is this catching the media's attention?
Well, Charlie, Daniel Perry is another one of the individuals who, like Kyle Rittenhouse, was involved in these riots of 2020, which engulfed the nation.
Pretty much every single major city saw these.
Now, while Kyle Rittenhouse was in Kenosha, Wisconsin, and was forced to use an AR-15 to defend himself against a violent mob, this was a situation where an individual, a Boogaloo boy, who was marching with the BLM rioters.
Now, Boogaloo, they're an anti-government organization that are also pro-BLM.
So the media will tell you that Boogaloos are all far right, but the pro-BLM SARF side and the complete anti-government, anti-police side doesn't necessarily make them fit one of the boxes just nicely.
So this guy's marching with the BLM rioters.
Daniel Perry is a serving U.S. sergeant in the U.S. Army, and his car is driving Uber on the side trying to make a few extra bucks.
His car gets surrounded by these guys.
And this individual, Garrett Foster, had been carrying a and actually slung around two-point sling of an AK-47, approaches Perry's car at the low ready.
Perry claims that the barrel started to move up.
He then withdrew his sidearm, fired five shots, and shot and killed Foster and then drove away in his car.
Foster, this Foster was killed.
Perry later claimed self-defense, spoke with police officers claiming self-defense, and actually said to them at one point, said to them one point, this phrase: I wasn't going to give him a chance to aim the rifle at me, which was later used to go to the jury by this Soros prosecutor.
Great example, folks, of why you shouldn't talk to the police without a lawyer, because they used that statement in court to say that Foster wasn't presenting a threat, even though he marched up to him with a mob of people, surrounded his car, and had an AK-47 within inches of his face.
I mean, I want to just reinforce that point that AK-47 pointed in his face with a mob around his car.
Why is this even a problem?
It's obviously self-defense.
Well, so what they're saying is because the AK-47 remained at the low ready, which means it was shouldered and pointed essentially lower at the car, that it didn't constitute an imminent threat, even though he was completely surrounded.
And again, an AK-47 would only have just moments of, you'd need merely milliseconds to be able to bring that up and fire the tool.
When did this happen?
When did this happen?
And is there any footage of it, like the Grittenhouse deal, or not really?
There's summer of 2020, but the footage is not as, well, I wouldn't say good, but I wouldn't say it's not necessarily as clear as the Kyle Rittenhouse footage.
That footage and that event was, it was a unique phenomenon that you have almost every single step of that incident of the Kyle Rittenhouse coverage done by these Daily Call reporters and independent reporters who are all there filming the whole thing.
I later broke on Human Events Daily that the FBI actually had a surveillance plane up in the sky that was collecting footage that was withheld from Kyle Rittenhouse.
But with that massive bevy of footage that we have there in this case, we only have one.
I don't know if you guys have the clip, but they have a very short, grainy piece of footage that you're only able to see from kind of across the street.
That's why we need more citizen journalists.
And so, Jack, this is just gaining attention.
Why?
And he's seeking a pardon, but it's a very complex process in Texas.
Right.
So he was convicted on Friday of this.
He was given a murder conviction.
Sentencing is yet to happen, though life in prison certainly would be, I think, on the table.
I don't necessarily think that he would get the death penalty for this.
But then again, it is Texas.
So let's see.
However, Governor Abbott has come in immediately, come hard swinging, saying he will issue a pardon the minute the recommendation is placed on his desk.
Now, Texas, along with the other southern states, don't exactly have this direct unilateral ability for the governor to be able to issue a pardon the way you would see at the presidential level or some other states.
They have essentially a pardon board that has to review the cases and then present their recommendations to the governor.
And then what is the process there?
Then what ends up happening?
They vote on it or who puts the people on the pardon board?
Do we know that?
I'm sure we'll learn.
Secure Prices for Real Meat00:02:42
Right, the board, and I'd have to get the exact requirements of how you get on the board.
I imagine the governor or lieutenant governor play a huge role in that, the way they do in many states.
I believe the lieutenant governor is on the board.
And then you see this across the country.
I'm more familiar with Pennsylvania, where the lieutenant governor essentially leads that board.
And so what Gabbitt has said, though, is that he wants this to be expedited.
He wants Ken Paxton, the attorney general, to be involved.
They've all been very vocal on social media.
And the governor has said that immediately when that hits his desk, he will be issuing a pardon.
Because essentially, Charlie, the question here for us, beyond the specific facts of the case, which we have and which we're going over in court many times, we also have to look at the broader picture.
This is a left-wing mob that was allowed to operate.
And then a Soros DA comes in and tries to put him in prison.
Jack Pesobic, thank you so much.
Check out his show every night at 10 p.m.
Unrev.
Look, we're already a few months into the new year.
And if you haven't changed the way you buy meat, you need to right now.
So look, goodranchers.com promo code Kirk is amazing.
GoodRanchers, you're able to lock in your price and avoid meat inflation.
You enjoy the highest quality meat in America.
And my code, by the way, gives you $20 off.
Here's the thing.
I'm going to tell you more and more reasons throughout, but the bacon that they send tastes so good.
And by the way, bacon's actually could be very good for you.
Stop listening to those doctors that tell you not.
Now, look, too much of anything is bad.
But if you actually, you might be cholesterol deficient, you need to get good fats in your diet.
It literally helps your brain.
The pigs are never in crates that... the bacon comes from, which happens to happen way too much on factory farms.
Good Ranchers never uses antibiotics or adds any hormones.
And their pork is from heritage breeds that have historically produced the best pork in the world.
Reason number two to subscribe to Good Ranchers is that you lock in your price when you subscribe.
My grocery bill would go up every week if it weren't for Good Ranchers.
I consistently get the same quality and quantity of meat every time.
So subscribe and enjoy the security of their price lock guarantee.
And finally, also, it's because everything they sell is so good.
They're all natural burgers, USDA steaks, and more.
So head on to goodranchers.com and use promo code Charlie for $20 off your first box.
Free bacon, great meat, and a secure price.
And a bonus, $20 off today.
Support our show.
Support American Ranchers.
And by the way, if you are on this meatlist stuff, you got to knock it off.
That's all a bunch of crap.
You got to go to goodranchers.com, get real meat, feed it to your kids.
It's the most healthy thing you could do.
Goodranchers.com, American Meat Delivered, GoodRanchers.com.
Students Hostaged on Campus Police00:12:16
The biggest story in the nation over the weekend was Riley Gaines speaking at a turning point USA chapter event at San Francisco State University.
She was terrorized by trans activists, and she's here right now to share her story and what she has planned next.
Riley, welcome to the program.
I'm glad you're doing okay.
Walk us through the events that occurred Thursday evening at San Francisco State University.
Absolutely.
So I had arrived to the event.
I was supposed to meet the campus police an hour and a half before, but they did not show up.
And so I carried on.
I did my speech.
It, of course, was filled with protesters, but for the most point, or for the most part, at this point, they were pretty peaceful.
It was after the event when it turned not peaceful.
Ambushers rushed into the room.
They turned off the lights.
They were flickering the lights and they rushed me.
I was physically and verbally assaulted, to which I was rushed out of the room and I couldn't exit the building because they were coming from every direction.
And so I was barricaded in a separate classroom building for three hours after this.
So Riley, were these students or were these outside agitators or do you not know?
I believe for the most part they were students.
Most of them were relatively young.
So I think they were students.
And is it correct that they were asking for money while they were holding you hostage, almost ransom payments?
As crazy as that sounds, yes.
For they were trying to negotiate with the dean of students.
They were saying that if I am getting paid to be there from the school, which I wasn't getting paid to be there from the school anyways, but if I was getting paid to be there, then it's only fair that they get paid.
If I wanted to make it to home safely, it's only fair that I pay them money.
That's kidnapping.
I mean, literally, that's extortion.
It's kidnapping.
So I'm just confused.
I mean, the police, they were protecting you in this room for multiple hours.
I'm sure after 10, 15, 20 minutes, you probably struck up a conversation with them.
I know that you're thankful that you didn't get hurt and they were there, but at some point, did you be like, yo, can you just like get some handcuffs and solve this?
Absolutely.
I asked them, you know, why are you guys not asserting force to get me out of this building?
Because I had a flight that I missed, which I didn't want to miss.
I didn't want to get stuck in San Francisco an extra day.
And so I was telling them, you know, I need to get out.
I need to go to the airport.
And they said, we don't want to assert any kind of force.
Clearly, it was because they didn't want to be seen as anything other than an ally to that community because they knew what it meant for them.
They knew it put their job at risk if they were to be accused of any of these things.
And so they would rather not do their job than be seen as, again, anything other than an ally.
They didn't want to be racist or transphobic or any of these other things.
So just to make sure I understand correctly that while they are demanding money, the police officers were intimidated by these.
Is that fair to say the police officers were intimidated by the people who assaulted you?
I believe so, yes.
They truthfully did a very poor job.
I'm always grateful for law enforcement, of course, but I do believe these campus police did not accurately and effectively do their job.
It wasn't until three hours later when the city of San Francisco police stepped in, I was able to safely evacuate the building, which was still surrounded by protesters and people yelling terrible, obscene things at both myself and the officers.
But I thank the city of San Francisco police for getting me out safely.
Yeah, and that's an important distinction.
But the people that were basically in the hostage situation with you, they were police officers or the actual campus police officers?
Yes, they were.
But again, they were supposed to go over an exit plan with me if something like this were to happen, to which they never showed up to alert me.
The officer who helped me escape the first classroom building where I was ambushed, she was in nothing that indicated she was an officer, no clothing that indicated such.
And so I didn't truthfully trust that she was an officer.
And so I didn't want to follow her because I didn't believe her.
So it was just a whole slew of things that they could have done better to get me out of that environment safely that they did not do.
A comedy of errors.
You were assaulted.
Walk us through specifically how you were punched.
You know, the lights were flickering on and off.
I was hit twice.
I was hit once in the shoulder the second time, also in the shoulder, but grazing my face.
The turning point field rep, her name is Amber.
She was shoved in the face as well.
These people, they were relentless.
They were violent.
I think it's worth noting that even the press secretary of the White House the day before told these people to fight back.
Those were her words.
That's right.
In the hallway during my speech, I could hear the protesters yelling, trans rights are under attack.
What do we do?
We fight back.
And the police, again, did nothing to de-escalate this situation prior to the ambush.
So I just want to, one part of the story I think that hasn't really been focused on, these people stood outside there for three hours.
I mean, and then I have to be told by conservatives they don't have time to go vote.
I mean, I just, these people really care about this.
I mean, three hours to go hold you hostage on a college campus.
Do you have any thoughts on that?
It's amazing that people put this much effort and time into something that they don't like.
I don't even know if I put this much time and effort into things that I do like.
So it's amazing that people will go to these lengths to silence.
Well, and we know why they don't.
Yeah, we know why, but Riley, I have to interrupt you.
This is why they've taken so much ground, though.
They care.
I mean, here it is.
It's a Thursday night before Good Friday.
I don't think these people exactly observe Easter, but that's a separate issue.
You know, in downtown San Francisco, you're going to ask you about your speech in a second, but they're willing to basically dedicate four or five hours.
If you count the prep time, sit through your speech, and then stand outside where you are for three hours.
These people are just hostages.
Like it's Sodom and Gomorrah, right?
And demanding that you come out, obviously wishing you harm because they assaulted you.
And so let's kind of then build it out.
What was your speech about?
What was your argument?
What did you say that made them so full of rage and fury and anger that made them want to kidnap you?
Of course, what has thrusted me into this position of being some sort of a public figure is taking a public stance and acknowledging that men and women are different in ways that give males advantages when competing in something that requires sheer athleticism or strength.
It's that simple.
Men should not compete against women.
And so my speech, I highlighted the work that you put in as a female athlete.
I, of course, am 22.
I just graduated college, but I swam since I was four years old.
I swam in college six hours every single day, three hours before 8 a.m.
And so I highlight this.
I highlight, of course, our national championships.
I highlight what that locker room piece looked like.
I highlighted the silencing that other female athletes are dealing with, coaches, parents, what that looks like, and why denying objective truth is harmful, to which I was met with, again, violence.
You met with violence.
And now you're not backing down, and we're not backing down at Turning Point USA.
We're going to have much better security in Albany because, you know, we relied on the campus police, fool me once, whatever.
We're not going to put that back in.
But you're going to do more campus events, right?
You're going up.
I don't know if it's Albany, but you're going to Buffalo.
I'm sorry, I get my New York City, New York City's messed up.
You're going to State University of New York, Buffalo, and they're already using your image for hate, obviously.
The trannies are coming after you big time.
So what do you plan to do at State University, New York, Buffalo?
Same thing.
I will not be deterred.
I would take a right hook from Mike Tyson if it meant defending girls and women and protecting their rights.
And so this will not stop me.
It will not slow me down.
It only assures me that I'm doing the right thing.
Even right now, I'm here in Louisville, where, of course, there was a tragic shooting this morning.
But typically when these kind of events happen, it draws out people who want to be destructive in different ways.
And so I'm here doing some different events to which I was just five minutes ago met with protesters who had to be escorted because they were trying to hurt me.
But it doesn't scare me.
It only, again, encourages me.
It assures me that when they want you silenced, it only means that you should speak louder.
That's exactly right.
And, you know, we have your back 100% at Turning Point USA.
We want to send you to every chapter imaginable.
And she's not backing down.
You're emboldened and you have more conviction than ever.
I hope all of you in the audience draw some inspiration from this because Riley is now going to metaphorically punch back twice as hard, even though she got punched.
And she said, listen, I'm willing to take a hit from Mike Tyson.
By the way, you might have to one day.
Mike Tyson in a dress might show up to you, some tranny activist that is able to be a man.
I'm curious, though, the people that were assaulting you and doing this, were these men posing as women or women posing as men, or just wasn't clear.
I'm asking for a reason.
Who were these people that would just dedicate hours of their time to try to kidnap you?
Both and everything in between.
It was truthfully, it's obviously extremely confusing when all of the different aspects of what goes into this gender spectrum that people are looking to.
So there was both men dressed as women and women dressed as men claiming that identity.
And there was hundreds, hundreds of people holding me hostage.
So definitely both.
Riley, in closing, the vice president of whatever said that the students were brave and courageous.
Your response.
It blows my mind.
It blows my mind the lengths people are willing to go to to lie or to virtue signal.
Or does she really believe this?
Does she really believe these people were peaceful?
Um, if that's the case, then I guess she'll be hearing from my lawyer because that was not peaceful.
What I experienced was not peaceful.
I was, of course, I feared for my life in that situation when you're ambushed in that way.
Um, and then to come out and applaud them and tell them how hard it can be to have a conservative speaker on your campus.
And here are some resources that you can seek because it's so difficult to listen to someone who has a different perspective than you.
It's setting these kids up for failure, and we're seeing it at institutions and universities all over the country.
So chilling.
Jamila Moore, Vice President of Student Affairs of Enrollment, apologizes that you were allowed on campus, calls the students that were terrorists towards you brave.
It's really something.
Riley, we're going to see you soon.
And I know you have another campus event coming up this week.
I hope it remains peaceful and we're going to have a good security presence there to help you out because the campus police can't be trusted.
Thank you, Riley.
Appreciate it.
Thank you so much.
Hey, everybody, this is Charlie Kirk.
And you know by now that we're helping save babies with our friends at Preborn.
With Mother's Day coming up in less than a month, can there be a better time than right now to stand for life?
When you introduce a girl to her baby by providing an ultrasound, more than 85% of the time she will choose life.
You're giving her access to a two-year mentorship program and the chance to receive maternity clothes, baby clothes, diapers, parenting classes, but perhaps most importantly, someone to walk alongside her and be a friend during this most crucial time of her life.
You see, $140 gives five mothers a free ultrasound and saves babies.
$200 can save 10 babies, and just $28 a month can save a baby a month for less than a dollar a day.
And $15,000 gift, well, that will provide an ultrasound machine that will save lives for years to come.
Naked Trans People on TV00:07:04
Whether you want to save one baby or five or hundreds, join me in supporting Pre-Born.
I financially support them, and you should too.
Go to preborn.org or go 833-850-BABY.
That is 833-850-2229.
Go to preborn.org.
That is preborn.org.
We are just seeing the beginning stages of the damage that this trans movement will do.
And it's so interesting how it started, right?
It started with Jenner on, I think it was Vogue, the front page of Vogue or whatever.
One of those fashion magazines that nobody reads.
And everyone said, oh, yeah, you know, live and let live.
And it was never about that.
No, it's about tyranny.
It's about conformity.
It's about imposing their viewpoint on you.
And we see this trend repeatedly.
Because if it really was about tolerance, then it wouldn't be an issue.
If the trans people were actually tolerant themselves, then they wouldn't show up to Riley Gaines and act the way they did.
So they, so let me get this straight.
They demand tolerance with force.
It's a very strange equation, isn't it?
Tolerate me, and I'm going to force you to tolerate me.
That's the opposite of voluntary tolerance, isn't it?
No, there is a very disturbing, now well-documented decline in the West.
And we're about to show you something from the Netherlands that you won't believe.
I want to get this Dutch TV from the Netherlands, from Holland, of what's happening there where they're showing naked trannies to kids on television.
It's considered art.
Again, when you remove Christianity as the anchor of the West, something really evil and dystopian, broken, and damaging will replace it.
And these secular views are replacing it.
And, you know, it's really interesting.
I've been giving this speech across the country, and even secular conservatives who maybe don't believe in Christianity and they're not convinced on that.
I think there is a growing movement that at least Christianity created a freer society.
Okay, so when you remove Christianity and you remove the bedrock of the Bible in society, what do you get in place of that?
Well, in the Netherlands, they are showing on television naked trans people in front of kids.
Play cut 23.
Yeah, I mean, for all of you that don't speak Dutch, I think that would be right.
Is that right?
Yeah, that don't speak the native tongue.
Let me just tell you kind of what that is.
So, effectively, that is what was being shown on TV is a group of trans people with no clothes on in front of 10 and 12 year olds with a host, kind of a television host, celebrating it.
And the kids get to look at the naked trans people and ask questions about their top and bottom surgeries.
This is what is passing for art in the Netherlands with cut lines all over their chests.
It's happening here.
It's going to come here very soon.
I mean, if it's not on television already, I mean, effectively already is.
You can see that stuff all over social media.
When you don't have a true north, when you do not have what the Greeks used to call a telos or a teleological purpose, where are you heading?
You see, how do you know a line is crooked if you do not have a straight line to compare it to, as C.S. Lewis would famously say?
So, who's to say that's wrong?
Who's to say that a bunch of naked people on TV in front of kids is wrong?
The left finds it to be funny, they find it to be illuminating.
They think it's good.
You know, the kids get exposed to sexual matters.
This is a good thing.
You remove a standard, something will fill the void.
And you are living through what Nietzsche predicted.
And it was not a proclamation.
It was not celebration.
In fact, I think it drove him mad.
He saw the end of the West before anybody else.
And Joe Biden wants to use that sort of perverse ideology to try to get him another term.
We made a prediction that Joe Biden would not run for re-election.
That prediction might end up being wrong.
We'll see.
It still could end up being right.
But Joe Biden is certainly looking like he's going to run for re-election because candidates don't matter.
Just look at John Fetterman.
What matters is ballot chasing and the machinery.
And they feel so confident in their machinery in Georgia, Wisconsin, and Arizona that this doesn't matter.
And so Joe Biden wants to mobilize woke influencers to be able to win the White House.
Who is he talking about?
Play Cut 22.
This is who he thinks is going to help win the White House for him.
Play Cut 22.
Hi.
Impressive carrying skills, right?
I got some Bud Lights for us.
So I kept hearing about this thing called March Madness, and I thought we were all just having a hectic month, but it turns out it has something to do with sports.
This month I celebrated my day 365 of womanhood and Bud Light sent me possibly the best gift ever, a can with my face on it.
Cheers.
Go team.
Whatever team you love, I love too.
That's who Joe Biden thinks is going to help win him in the White House.
By the way, there's a new Mario movie out in theaters.
It got very poor reviews, but audiences love it and it made a ton of money because people are indulging in nostalgia.
Who can blame them?
I heard a 90s song the other day at a restaurant.
I was like, wow, I miss that country.
It's like immediately I have like a flashback to a country where trannies weren't able to do Bud Light commercials.
It was a better country back then.
I'm sorry, it was.
It was a better country when people like Riley Gaines would show up at San Francisco University and say men are women.
They'd be like, okay.
Nostalgia is a very powerful political tool.
It's going to be used more and more.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email us your thoughts.
As always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening and God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk. com.