Kari Lake for Senate? with Kari Lake and Rep. Mike Johnson
Kari Lake is still fighting to redeem Arizona elections through the court system, but if that fight doesn't succeed, what's ahead? Is she thinking of challenging Kyrsten Sinema and Ruben Gallego in Arizona's oddball three-way 2024 Senate race? Charlie chats with Kari about her future. Plus, Congressman Mike Johnson joins to discuss the House's new investigation into Merrick Garland's Orwellian plan to treat parents like domestic terrorists for opposing CRT and transgenderism in their children's schools.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Defending Constitution and Tradition00:10:58
Hey everybody, Tan Charlie Kirk Show.
Congressman Mike Johnson from Louisiana and then Carrie Lake join us.
We talk about her latest lawsuit.
We talk about the targeting of parents.
Is she going to run for the Senate and so much more?
Email me directly, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Get involved with TurningPointUSA today at tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
Start a high school or a college chapter at tpusa.com.
Email me your thoughts as always freedom at charliekirk.com.
That is freedom at charliekirk.com.
When you get involved with Turning Point USA and start a high school or college chapter, you are making a decision to do something to save America.
If you have a high school student in your life, encourage them to start a Turning Point USA chapter.
Same for your college students in your life, or if you are a college student, check it out right now.
Thank you for those of you that support our program at charliekirk.com slash support.
If this program has impacted your life significantly or materially in any way, then please consider going to charliekirk.com slash support and help us reach more young people.
That is charliekirk.com slash support.
No pressure.
Only if you feel as if our show has helped your life.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at AndrewandTodd.com.
Joining us right now is a great American, Mike Johnson from the Great State of Louisiana.
We just had a big event in Louisiana.
Congressman Johnson, welcome to the program.
Hey, Charlie, great to hear your voice, my friend.
Yes.
Thank you for your leadership and your courage.
You held a hearing yesterday on the Merrick Garland memo targeting parents at school boards.
Tell us about it.
What did you learn?
Well, we are presenting the facts of the American people to draw their own conclusions, Charlie.
You can't make this stuff up.
It's absolutely crazy.
We know now because we've been in the process of issuing subpoenas for all the documentation.
We know for a fact that the National School Boards Association, which is a leftist group, colluded with the Biden administration to insert federal law enforcement into local school board meetings.
So if you rewind in your mind back to the fall of 2021, they were, it was in the middle, by the way, of this contentious governor's race in Virginia where Terry McCulloch was up against Glenn Young.
And you remember the big issue there was what was happening in Loudoun County and some of the school districts there.
It drew everybody's attention to this wild curricula stuff.
So you had parents who, mama bears and concerned dads who showed up at school board meetings all around the country to protest mask mandates and school closures and curricula decisions.
And the NSBA, the school boards association, was intimidated by that.
So they asked the White House to get the DOJ involved to equate the parents with domestic terrorists.
And that is exactly what they did.
Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo October 4 of that year.
He involved the entire apparatus of the DOJ, the U.S. Attorney's Offices, the FBI, and they created a threat tag under the Domestic Terrorism Resources Unit.
And they started labeling and investigating parents for showing up at school board meetings.
You cannot make this stuff up.
Yeah.
And so who's going to be held accountable?
Who's going to be fired?
This is something I hear.
And I know this is a tough question for you to answer.
And I'm not putting it on you, but people are mad.
People are pissed.
Excuse my language.
Is someone going to be fired, like lose a pension, have to explain themselves?
Maybe go to jail for doing this?
Yeah, yes.
Look, it's a blatant violation of the Constitution.
Okay, the government obviously cannot collude with private organizations to silence and censor conservatives and people's viewpoints they disagree with.
There are civil penalties that can apply to this.
There are private lawsuits and all of that.
But the ultimate concern is the people's faith in our institution of justice itself, the system of justice that we have, which is kind of a critical thing to maintain in a constitutional republic, as you and I know and talk about all the time.
So where's the accountability?
Well, look.
We're the House majority.
We only have a majority in one house of Congress.
We're going to investigate this.
That's one power that we have.
We also have the power of the purse.
Jim Jordan and I and the rest of our committee don't have the power to go arrest and try people, put them on, you know, under oath and try them in a court.
But we can draw out the facts.
We can create legislation to reform these things to make sure this madness never is allowed to happen again.
And ultimately, we have the power of the purse string.
So we'll go to the full extent of our authority.
We may have to defund some of these agencies and certainly some of these officials who want to do big things.
They need us to send them the finances to do it.
And if they're not going to respect the Constitution and respect the fundamental rights of parents to raise their kids and let their voices be heard, then they don't deserve taxpayers' treasure.
And that's the bottom line.
That's where we're headed with all this.
It's a deliberative process because we got to lay out the facts.
This is not a partisan exercise on our part.
We're trying to defend the Constitution and tradition in this country.
And we're going to go to every length that we can to make sure that happens.
To the best of your knowledge, has Merrick Garland retracted the memo?
No, that's the crazy thing, Charlie.
We have sent him, Jim Jordan and I and the rest of the committee have sent him letter after letter, demand after demand, to retract that memo.
And he never has.
So it's been hanging out there since October 4th of 2021.
And he uses these vague terms.
This is what's so dangerous about it, okay?
He uses these vague terms like harassment and intimidation.
They're broad.
They're undefined.
Harassment is now under DOJ authority.
Harassment, Congressman.
Yeah.
I mean, even if they were, which they weren't, this harassment is for a local police officer.
That's not even, that doesn't even go to like a DA, right?
I mean, this is harassment.
Right.
I mean, look, I was the First Amendment religious liberty defense lawyer for 20 years.
Harassment is so broad you can't even define it.
It's a thousand different I get accused of that.
But if there's actual physical violence, which almost never happens or the threat of that, that is obviously to be handled by local authorities, and everybody knows that.
So you had whistleblowers within the FBI who are pushing back against this, saying, this is not our role.
What are we doing?
This is crazy.
And they were right.
But Merrick Garland keeps the memo out there.
Why, Charlie?
Why?
Because they want to intimidate parents into silence.
They want to censor and silence conservative moms and dads.
And it's had the desired effect because no one wants to go to their school board meeting and get the FBI on their back.
No, I know in some ways it's an unfair question, Congressman, that you receive a lot, but I think you're sensing the vibe that people are mad and that there needs to be some accountability.
And it's not, I mean, you're right.
You're a congressman.
You do not have indictment authority, right?
But just explain a little bit more the path forward of what happens when the people with the handcuffs break the law.
How do that well?
That's the most dangerous of all scenarios, isn't it?
It is.
It is absolutely dangerous.
We're in uncharted waters as a nation.
We've never had this.
You know, the people rely upon the system of justice being equal, that we really do have equal justice under the law.
It's chiseled into the marble above the door of the U.S. Supreme Court.
It's part of who we are.
Lady Justice wears a blindfold because you're not supposed to have two tiers, two systems of justice, one for the rich in power, one for everybody else.
But that's what people see right now.
That's the perception.
Perception is reality.
We have record low numbers of confidence among the people in our institutions themselves.
And you cannot maintain a system of government like ours, a constitutional republic, if people don't have faith in the system of justice itself.
So to have the Attorney General, Merritt Garland, in charge of all this, writing hurt over this, allowing this member to hang out there and chill the First Amendment rights, protected expression of concerned parents, is unconscionable.
It is illegal.
I mean, on its face, it's unconstitutional.
And we're going to push that as far as we can.
We'll fight them in the courts.
And hopefully, ultimately, there'll be real accountability for the people at the top.
And we're pushing that.
We're laying out the case for it methodically.
We couldn't even begin this process, as you know, until late January because we didn't have the majority.
We didn't have subpoena power until just a couple of months ago.
So we're asking everybody: look, nobody wants to move this faster than those of us on the weaponization committee and judiciary committee.
I mean, we've been chewing over this for years now, waiting for our turn.
We have it now.
We have to let the process play out.
And ultimately, you're going to see legislation that will bring reform to this chaos and you're going to see the power of the purse used because we'll have to do that.
Yeah.
So I also want to talk about the kind of new news here.
I want to make sure I understand this.
It's just kind of breaking here about the Weapons of Government Committee sending subpoenas to universities, which good for you guys for holding those islands of totalitarianism accountable.
What's going on here?
ProPublica has leaked this story, so it might be a dishonest representation.
But specifically, it seems as if University of Washington, Stanford, and Clemson seeking records related to the moderation of social media content.
What can you tell us about it?
Well, we have allegations, of course, that not only was the FBI colluding with big tech platforms, but maybe some of these publicly funded institutions have as well, that they've been censoring and silencing conservatives.
I mean, it seems Orwellian and surreal, but these things are happening.
And we're gathering the documents through subpoena authority to prove all this.
And so they don't comply.
I mean, even the Department of Justice doesn't comply with our letters and requests for information.
So we've got to use the compulsory resources within our jurisdiction to do it.
And that's subpoenas.
And so we're gathering all of this.
We're going to follow the truth where it leads.
And I think it's going to be very alarming to a lot of people.
What it's going to do for people like you and me, Charlie, it's going to confirm what we know intuitively has been happening for years now.
That the volume has been turned down on conservative voices.
It's happened.
You and me and all of us.
Well, I mean, when I go to these campuses, just recently at UC Davis, I mean, and you guys are doing the right thing.
You're fighting hard, and it's critical.
And I know the audience, we're getting a lot of your emails.
Charlie, one of the indictments and stuff coming.
Congress has a role to play.
I share that attitude.
I share that frustration, but this is necessary to find the facts, do the oversight.
The fourth branch of government, the bureaucracy is out of control.
They're unelected.
They're unknown.
They're unaccountable.
And this new Congress is doing more than any time in my lifetime to actually oversee and fulfill a constitutional mandate.
And it's promising.
I hope they keep up the momentum.
Congressman, thank you so much.
Thank you, my friend.
Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here.
Lockdowns Making Kids Dumber00:05:36
Just when you thought it couldn't get any better, Mike Lindell with My Pillow is launching the My Pillow 2.0.
That's right.
You heard me, MyPillow 2.0.
When Mike Lindell, great American patriot, invented My Pillow, had everything you could ever want in a pillow.
But now 20 years later, he discovered a new technology that makes it even better.
The My Pillow 2.0 has a patented, adjustable fill on the original My Pillow.
And now with a brand new fabric that is made with a temperature regulating thread.
For exclusive listeners, the MyPillow 2.0 is buy one, get one free offer with promo code Kirk and get your best sleep ever.
MyPillow 2.0 temperature regulating technology is 100% made in America and comes with a 10-year warranty and a 60-day money-back guarantee.
Go to mypillow.com and click on the Radio Listener Square to buy one and get one free offer.
Enter promo code Kirk or call 800-875-0425 to get your MyPillow 2.0 now.
That is mypillow.com.
Promo code Kirk.
Check it out.
We talk a lot about education here and also at Turning Point USA, but Americans are getting dumber.
That's a fact.
American IQ scores are lower in three domains, higher in one.
IQ scores have substantially increased from 1932 to the 20th century, with differences ranging from three to five IQ points per decade.
But a new study shows that they've now been going down.
Why?
Well, verbal reasoning, logic, vocabulary, matrix reasoning, and letter and number series dropped during the study period.
But scores of 3D rotation, spatial reasoning, generally increased from 11 to 18, probably because of video games and screens, because you're kind of working that part of the brain.
If you're playing Halo or Call of Duty, you're not exactly working logic, vocabulary, visual problem solving, or analogies.
So education is very important.
We need more parental involvement in education.
While BLM shakes down American corporations for $83 billion, we don't talk about how fathers are no longer in the black community.
Every time someone brings up racism to you, by the way, your answer should be one number, 75.
Every time they say racism, say 75.
Every time they say racism, you say 75.
And they might say, what are you doing?
75% of black homes, black kids are raised without a father in the house.
75%.
That's not because of racism.
It's not because of the white man.
It's for a lot of other reasons besides that.
It's the most important number.
No one wants to talk about it.
And then it impacts educational outputs, IQ development, language development.
Thomas Sowell proves this, by the way, in his book, Discrimination and Disparities.
You want to know a real privilege?
Firstborn child privilege.
If you are the oldest child, you have a higher IQ, less likely to go to prison, more likely to have a higher income.
Why?
You get the most attention.
You hear the most words.
The amount of words a child hears in a day-to-day basis during the months of six months to two years, really critical child developmental time, especially if they're around adults, not other kids, increases their ability to understand language, increases their IQ substantially.
So Thomas Sowell says that's a better reason to actually be able to pinpoint how people get smarter or dumber over a period of time.
Well, AOC wants to weigh in on just the general education topic.
Let's watch this together.
Play cut 103 as AOC proves their upside down priorities while education was supposed to be talking about play cut 103 of AOC.
They are asking the Republican Party to keep culture wars out of classrooms.
Our children need urgent and aggressive educational solutions.
The American Library Association coming out against this Republican proposal.
When we talk about progressive values, I can say what my progressive value is, and that is freedom over fascism.
She used to be kind of interesting and able to go viral and someone that, you know, at least was, I don't know, someone that would catch your attention.
She's just become really boring and simple-minded, especially with her support of the proxy war in Ukraine.
She would say interesting, contrarian things.
It would be entertaining.
It'd be kind of like watching the Young Turks or MSNBC.
Like, whoa, that's kind of weird.
Now she's just kind of really mainstream.
She's kind of lost her appeal.
Freedom over fascism.
I don't know what that means, okay?
By the way, you're the fascist, AOC.
You yearn for censorship.
You deep down would have been a perfect Pulitzer member of Stalinist government.
You would have been a total march and lockstep Maoist.
And so look, math scores fell in nearly every state.
Again, we predicted this on this program.
When we talked about how the lockdowns will make kids dumber, we did it anyway.
Talked about how the lockdowns will create inflation.
We did it anyway.
And instead, we are now implementing gender ideology, fake history, grievance studies.
In the country, we are now producing students with the lowest IQ in a generation.
And by the way, in addition, they're sexualizing our kids on top of that.
And what is AOC talking about?
AOC is putting up some memo from the American Library Association.
The solution is very simple.
We need to get out of government schools.
Government schools have messed this up terribly.
We need charter schools.
We need more entrepreneurs.
We need full and complete school choice.
We need to break the back of the cartel, the teacher unions who have done such damage to our country.
The American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, run by Randy Whitgarten.
She runs AFT.
I can't remember who runs NEA.
I don't remember which one is which.
Election Ballots and Signatures00:15:16
They're both big.
And then we need to empower parents.
Everything that they try to do, everything the collectivists and the Marxists, the totalitarians try to do is try to break the bond between a child and a parent.
Government gets stronger that way.
That's what they've done in the black community because there's no dad around.
When there's no dad around, the government gets a lot more powerful and it's easier to control those communities.
No one wants to talk about it.
No one wants to say it out loud instead.
We have to talk about racism and white supremacy and all these other white liberal fantasies.
But instead, we should say, why is it that 75% of black kids in America don't have a father around?
Is that okay?
Is that acceptable?
No, it should be unacceptable.
Instead of $83 billion to BLM to go through racketeering exercise, it should be used to maybe have a PR campaign to say, hey, black men, don't abandon the women you impregnate.
Probably a lot more effective than mansions in Malibu, BLM.
Joining us now, Kerry Lake from the great state of Arizona.
Kerry, welcome to the program.
There's an update regarding your legal challenge.
Walk our audience through it.
Well, we got news from the Arizona Supreme Court that they were going to take that portion, that ever important portion of our original lawsuit where we challenged how they, that the fact that they were not following the procedures for signature verification on the millions of mail-in ballots.
And the Supreme Court of Arizona says that that lower court judge has to listen to that and has to take that up and take a look at it.
He can't just dismiss it.
So we're ecstatic.
I mean, I've heard people trying to understand what happened in the Arizona Supreme Court.
Was it good news?
Was it bad news?
We sent in a lot to the Supreme Court.
And obviously, you always want to have them come back with everything in your favor.
The fact that this one giant pillar is going to be heard now is massive.
I heard somebody say, I don't know, is this good news?
I said, are you kidding me?
For over three years now, we've been trying to get election integrity lawsuits through the courts with no luck.
Not a single door has opened.
This is the first door that has opened.
It is massive.
It is giant.
And we are ecstatic.
The signature verification, as you know, on mail-in ballots, Charlie, it's the only security feature we have to ensure that bogus ballots aren't making it through into the final count and watering down the legal vote.
And we know that they have been being sent through with improper signatures by the hundreds of thousands.
We can prove that in court, and we're excited to have an opportunity to do that.
And we think that Maricopa County officials, election officials, Stephen Richer, we think Katie Hobbs, we think that cartel lawyer who is sitting in the Secretary of State's office are probably pretty nervous right now.
What were the other counts?
Because six out of seven got dismissed that you wished would have proceeded further.
Well, we were hoping that the Arizona Supreme Court would take a look at things like the failure of following the process of chain of custody that is so critical.
That's another security feature we have when it comes to ballot.
We should be able to track every single ballot right.
We should be able to track it and we know that if, on election day uh 400, 25 ballots were were, um were cast, that when they get back to MIK TECH for you know final tabulation that's exactly what they have.
And we know that about 300 000 ballots had zero chain of custody.
These ballots should not have been counted.
Where did they come from?
Where did they come from?
And I, you know, I am concerned that some of the other counts were not um upheld by the Supreme court, because what they're doing is basically ratifying um, a fraudulent election.
In our opinion, they are making law rather than making sure that law is upheld.
So yes, obviously we wish some of these other counts would have gone through.
We are thrilled.
We are thrilled that we, the court, ruled the way it did, because it has opened the door for us to prove this incredibly important situation, which is that our signature verification process is a total sham.
You know if you're going to take a look for people who don't know what mail-in balloting looks like, although most states are doing it.
The mail-in ballot comes in and it has a signature on the outside.
It's basically a legal affidavit saying signed by the voter, allegedly saying, yes, this is my ballot inside and i'm signing verifying it's my ballot.
Then they separate those out and they count the ballot.
Well, we have from three whistleblowers Charlie Um declarations signed under penalty of perjury, that they were rejecting tens of thousands of ballots a day as bad signatures that were nowhere near what the original voter signature looked like.
They were sending them up the chain of command to the next person and somehow, in the overnight hours, those tens of thousands were being just verified and checked and okay and sent through.
These are signatures that don't match.
How is that happening?
Our whistleblowers are going to be able to blow the top off of this sham called signature verification.
That's not being followed in Maricopa County and it is the way that they inject tens of thousands of illegal ballots into the system, watering down your vote, my vote and the good people of Arizona's legal vote.
So what is the process then?
So then, are you actually going to be able to inspect all the ballots.
Do you get a sample of them?
Does it have?
What is the process then?
Well I, I don't know exactly.
I you know.
I tell you what.
Anybody who is in college right now take a couple of legal classes.
I wish I would have taken some legal classes because i'm getting a quick education in the law and how it works.
But um, I believe that the judge just set a first appearance on the 30th, which is next week of march, and that's how we'll be going over um him taking this issue back up.
I'm not exactly sure what will transpire during that, if it's a scheduling meeting or what.
I'm going to be talking to my attorneys this morning and find out more about that, and hopefully we're able to.
I would like to be able to inspect some, some of those signatures and envelopes.
We know for a fact after looking at We the People, Shelby Bush and the work that they've done, that these signature verification, these signatures are completely not even close to matching.
It's almost as if you gave a three-year-old a crayon and said, copy someone's signature.
And that's what they look like.
Or there were many that went through with no signature.
If there's not a signature on that affidavit, which is the envelope, you cannot count that.
And we already know after seeing 2,000 mules, we've got all kinds of ballots being injected into the system, mail-in ballots that are very questionable, very questionable indeed.
And so to be able to look at this process, to be able to look at whether they followed the process, which according to our three whistleblowers, they did not.
They even had a third party group taking over looking at those ballots that got rejected.
So there were no observers at that third party.
And I don't have a name in front of me.
Otherwise, I would say what that group is.
They sent off a bunch of the rejected ballots to a third party outlet.
There were no observers there, and they started approving them.
You can't do that.
You have to have observers.
You can't have some third party outlet approving these ballots without going through the proper laws and procedures.
In Maricopa County, they don't follow election laws and they don't care about election procedures.
We've seen that in past elections, most notably the November 8th, 2022 election.
So the high court, I'm reading here from TPM, post-millennial, ordered Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson to review the element of Lake's case, again, to determine if the claim was properly dismissed previously or if Lake can, quote, prove votes were affected in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election.
And, you know, Kerry, this is so frustrating because how are you even supposed to know all that until you can look at the ballots?
And we are now months and now post-election day.
And it seems as if they just do this nonsense and they know they're going to get away with it.
And they just hope they just don't get caught afterwards, right?
So we need to structurally change this as well, don't we?
Absolutely.
And until we can get the legislature to do that, it's going to be difficult with this fraudulent governor in office.
But we've extrapolated out.
I'm sorry to be looking at my notes here that about at least 130,000 ballots in the 2022 election are mismatched, should not have been counted through this, them not following the procedures in the election verification process.
So that would be more than enough to cover that so-called 17,000 barrier between KD Hobbes and myself.
So we're not worried about coming up with the numbers on it, but the system is broken and they do drag this out.
Charlie, they never expected me to fight this.
They expected us to go, oh, dang, they stole another election and we'll just kind of go quietly into the good night.
No, we're not doing that anymore because we are on the verge of losing our country.
And this, you know, I don't mean to get too sentimental here, but our forefathers nearly 250 years ago fought for us to be able to vote to have the ability to choose our own representation and representatives so that we didn't have to take orders from the monarchy, from a king across the ocean.
Blood was spilled on this great country so that we have a chance to choose who we elect.
And we're losing that ability right now if our elections are run lawlessly like they are here in Maricopa County and frankly, in many counties across this country.
And so we will push it and I will push it here in the lower court.
And we're going to push those other counts.
I'm seriously considering taking everything to the United States Supreme Court because if we don't fight this battle right now, I fear that my children, your children, whether you're Democrat, Independent, Republican, I don't care what your political affiliation is.
I want your vote to count.
I want your legal vote to count, not be watered down with a bunch of bogus ballots.
It's too important what we're going up against right now.
And so we're going to take it all the way.
And I do that, and I say that because I'm out there with the people every day, not only in Arizona, but across the country.
I've done a lot of traveling and I get stopped in airports or wherever I am.
And people say, thank you for fighting this.
We know our elections are not being run properly.
And we need somebody to stand up and fight now.
I think the Supreme Court wants a case, to be honest.
I hope so.
In 20, they didn't act with a lot of courage.
Let me ask you, Carrie, I want you to speak directly to this.
We're receiving emails of people saying they're never going to vote again.
Is that your message to these people?
Because that's sometimes what people hear when we talk about the election being broken.
Absolutely not.
I disagree with that 100%.
Do I think our system is completely messed up?
Yes.
We have a movement, and that movement came out so strong on November 8th.
Think about this.
We came out in such huge numbers that they couldn't just steal it in the middle of the night like they did in 2020.
They had to engineer a sabotage of Election Day.
They had to reveal who they were.
They had to do it in front of our eyes in such a huge way that if you voted on Election Day, there's a really huge chance you saw what was going on.
And so we've got to continue to vote.
That's what they want.
We the people in the past, you know, eight, 10 years have started to step forward and say we have to be active part in saving our republic and keeping our republic.
And as we the people rise up and get politically involved, the political elite, frankly, doesn't like that.
They want us just living our lives, ignoring what's happening politically.
We've gotten involved and they want to put us back to sleep and get us to not vote in this system.
I think we have to turn up and vote in even bigger numbers.
We have to vote on election day.
We have to vote mail and ballot, whatever way we want, but vote, vote, vote.
Even in this messed up system, the harder we vote and the bigger we vote, the harder it is for them to cheat and the more they reveal who they are.
We find out what the crime is and who the criminals are.
If we don't show up, it's a guarantee the bad guys will win.
It's a guarantee.
That's right.
Carrie, are you going to run for the U.S. Senate?
Well, first things first, I have a really important case that we just talked about in the last segment, and I want to see this through.
You know, I don't know what the courts will decide.
It's worth pushing this because if we don't push this now and fight for fair, free, honest, and transparent elections, then, boy, I don't know that we have a country much longer.
But I do know this, Charlie.
They stole this election.
They rigged this election in order to stop me.
And because that's what kind of a threat I am to the political elite uniparty system.
And when they tried to stop me, they're trying to stop the people of Arizona.
And I got in this for the people of Arizona.
And so I am not going to let them stop me.
I don't know politically what I will do next.
I never had any desire to get into politics.
And the people of Arizona recruited me to run for governor.
And we have led an amazing movement of we the people.
And so it is something I will consider, seriously consider.
I've looked at a lot of polling, probably five polls showing that I can not only win handily in a primary, but I can go on to win the entire race for Senate.
And I'm very concerned about somebody like Ruben Gallego.
The guy's not who he said.
Well, actually, he is who he says he is.
He's a socialist and maybe even, maybe even hinging on a communist, a Marxist.
And his voting record is atrocious.
I don't believe he's an honest man.
And Kirsten Sinema, she votes with Joe Biden 93% of the time.
She votes with this maniac who's driving our country into the ditch.
She votes with this guy who is bought and paid for by the CCP and Ukraine 93% of the time.
That's not representing Arizona.
That's not independent.
That's a big joke that she comes out and says she's independent-minded.
She is, I believe she's two-faced.
You see her when she's in the Senate acting one way, and then she comes and does these consultant little ads and clips where she acts like she's very docile and doing things that are very balanced for the people of Arizona.
She is a radical in the Senate.
And I don't think she's that well liked except for people like Mitt Romney, who adores her.
So that tells you what kind of person she is.
She's with people like that.
No, sorry to interrupt, but you've probably received word, Carrie, a lot of 2024 potential candidates and current candidates have been going through Arizona looking to raise money and probe what's going on here.
Trump Support Growing Stronger00:02:08
Donald Trump might be indicted in an awful way by New York.
How does that play into the race?
You're behind Trump in 2024.
Your thoughts.
And I'm still behind President Trump.
I love President Trump and I love his policies.
I don't know any human being that could withstand the lies, the disparaging stories, the absolute onslaught that he took for seven years.
And some people say, oh, well, we have these other candidates who maybe aren't as bullish or whatever.
They haven't withstood what Donald Trump withstood.
That man has proven he's got the metal to get us through and get himself through anything.
And they still can't stop him with these bogus indictments and all of that.
And I know that he could get into office on day one, turn this Titanic around that Joe Biden is trying to sink our country.
He can get us on better, solid footing in a world stage and domestically.
We've already seen what he can do.
He can do great things.
So I'm appalled that they keep trying to weaponize their police departments, weaponize their prosecutorial, the prosecutors against him, the DOJ against him.
They are dragging him through the mud and they're dragging Americans along with it.
And we don't appreciate it.
And that's why we support him.
And I think his support is going to grow.
I hope that he does win.
And I hope that his support continues to grow.
The polls I'm seeing shows his support is growing, even amidst all of these phony charges that they're trying to lodge at him.
Carrie Lake, thank you for your leadership.
We're going to be following the legal challenge and I'll just keep on saying it.
It is a tragedy what has happened here in Arizona, but good things can come out of awful things and the Lord will make all good things, all things to his purpose.
Keep the faith.
Carrie Lake.
Thank you so much, Charlie.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email us your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.