All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Dec. 7, 2022 - The Charlie Kirk Show
36:13
The Biggest Lie in History with Dr. Andrew Huff
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Unsanitary Conditions and Modeling 00:09:53
Hey everybody, today in the Charlie Kirk Show, Dr. Andrew Huff, we go into great detail about his bombshell book about Wuhan, the truth about Wuhan.
Get your tickets to AmericaFest today at amfest.com, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Greg Gutfeld, Laura Ingram, and more, amf.com, amfest.com.
It's going to change your life.
Check it out now.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
For personalized loan services, you can count on.
Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandtodd.com.
The truth finally is coming out.
One of the great crimes of the last century was the American political involvement in mainland China in the development of the Chinese coronavirus.
Gain of function research, which Anthony Fauci said they weren't doing, which I believe he lied under oath.
But there is a bombshell new book called The Truth About Wuhan.
How I Uncovered the Biggest Lie in History by Dr. Andrew Huff.
And he joins us right now.
Dr. Huff, welcome to the program.
Tell us about yourself and the work that you did with the EcoHealth Alliance, and then make the argument that this is the biggest lie in history.
The floor is yours.
Well, that should be somewhat easy to do.
Thank you for having me, Charlie.
So I'm not a typical scientist.
I started off my career in the U.S. military.
I was an infantryman.
I served in Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom.
I thought I was going to be a career officer.
And then after my second employment, I had a change of heart and decided to go after my next passion in science.
My degrees are in psychology, security, technology, engineering, geographic information systems.
And my PhD is environmental health with an emerging infectious disease specialty track, which is epidemiology, essentially.
As a PhD student, I was groomed to be a leader in bioterror biosecurity.
I worked at a Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence as a PhD student on full scholarship.
I had all my dissertation research published, and they started bringing me out to Washington, D.C. to meet all the key players, all the top bureaucrats at the three-letter agencies in national security and bioterror and biowarfare.
When I wrapped up the PhD, essentially all the people that had trained me asked me point blank, where do you want to go next?
I kind of went to the State Department, CIA, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security.
I really had my choice.
I befriended a couple scientists who worked at Sandia National Laboratories, which is their primary mission there is to manufacture, make nuclear weapons technology.
So this is the most secure national laboratory in the country.
I actually worked in biologics and public health and then complex simulation modeling for doomsday events.
You know, working there, I had a change of heart.
I realized I didn't want to work for the defense industrial complex anymore.
And furthermore, with the top secret clearance, when your work is continually being classified, you get to a point where you're not able to leave that environment because how can you tell anyone or another, you know, an academic institution or university about the things that you had worked on?
So, all these things were happening.
I had these realizations.
So, I decided to go out and hunt for a new job.
And within a week, I found this cool place called Equal Health Alliance.
And they had this mission, which was something to the effect of we prevent emerging infectious diseases through conservation work.
So, the idea that you can protect and conserve wildlife in the environment, you can prevent emerging infectious disease risk.
And there's actually some scientific, there's scientific truth to that.
I mean, if people are not out in the environment where you're ripping apart and exposing yourself to new things, you can't get sick.
So, if you don't go into a back cave and you preserve it, you won't be exposed to the bats.
And that's what I thought I was getting into.
I was hired as a senior scientist in data and technology where I was building predictive technologies for the Department of Defense to actually detect emerging infectious diseases in near real time with machine learning, or it's commonly referred to as artificial intelligence.
I was very successful at that.
I brought in $6 million of funding in short order.
And through my success, I was promoted to vice president at Equal Health.
And as a condition of my promotion, I have to be added to other programs, other opportunities at the organization.
There was this program called PREDICT.
And PREDICT had the mission of going out and collecting emerging infectious diseases or diseases that believed to be emerging infectious diseases, like coronaviruses.
And then they were going to, you know, through all the sampling of animals and wildlife, they were going to predict and forecast pandemics.
Well, once I was promoted and I saw under the hood of this thing, I realized that that was a big farce.
I started to see everything else going on at the organization.
And I realized, you know, this is one big intelligence collection operation.
So it seemed.
Peter Datsuk and I, Dr. Dasik had a falling out, and I started applying for new jobs and I left and I went to go be a professor at Michigan State University.
It was one of the happiest days of my life.
And then you fast forward to SARS-CoV-2 emerging.
And then everything I knew about Equal Health Alliance, all the facts, my documents really came into play to solving what is, I guess, the biggest travesty in human history.
How so?
What documents, what did you learn that all of a sudden gave you insight that we weren't able to glean publicly from news reports or just suppositions?
Sure.
So based on my training, so being the guy that developed the biosurveillance platforms for free letter agencies, I know exactly how well these technologies work.
And they work very, very well.
So basically, if a disease starts spreading on the other side of the planet with our spy technology, our surveillance technology, and the processing power that we have and the algorithms that we have, we're able to sort of detect needles in a haystack and identify those quickly.
So I have this built into my brain and how intelligence analysts analyze a situation.
Just by random chance, I pick up on some chatter in mid-December of 2019 that there's an emerging infectious disease outbreak happening in Wuhan.
So the first thing I do is I try to validate that.
I find videos on YouTube and other platforms for channel places of, you know, people say this crazy stuff.
Well, at first, you know, you're skeptical what's going on here.
So I went and pulled PM 2.5 air emission pollutant data for Wuhan and then overlaid that with crematoriums.
And I saw that there was point source emission from the crematoriums, which is a clear indicator that they're trying to get rid of bodies as fast as they can, which is highly correlated with severe emerging infectious disease outbreak or event.
Well, you know, I do what any good scientists in my field, and I'm connected to the deep state, so to speak, I start calling up other doctors in my field, other public health practitioners, and asking what's going on.
Why aren't we sounding the alarm here?
Usually, the CDC would be on top of this right away, screaming at, you know, there's something happening.
Let's take precautionary measures.
Well, you get into the first weeks of January 2020, and this is barely a blip in the American by the U.S. government.
And meanwhile, all the American epidemiologists really started chatting about this in late December 2019.
The rest of my type of people find out about it.
And the first two weeks of January, I mean, there's a ton of chatter happening on a platform really called Pro-Med, which is a epidemiologic intelligence communication tool that's used by epidemiologists globally, open source platforms.
Slack channel for epidemiologists.
Yeah, basically, Slack channel for epidemiologists is a good way of putting it.
Some of those epidemiologists are pretty old, though, so you can barely get an email out, but they make it work.
But so, anyways, the government narrative starts coming out.
You know, Anthony Pauci telling us not to wear masks.
Well, the funny thing is, in my community, everyone associated their masks being with a respirator, N95 or better.
So when he starts telling them, I'm like, why are they telling people not to wear masks?
That's actually good advice.
It wasn't these stupid cloth things that it transformed into.
And then you just fast forward, you know, they're saying it's not airborne transmissible.
You go look at all the epidemiology studies coming out of Southeast Asia in February of 2020.
It's clearly airborne transmissible.
And every time they came out and they said something, I'm like, this doesn't make sense.
I'd question it.
And in the back of my mind, I knew that eCroft Alliance had been doing this gain of function work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
You know, another thing that they came out and said, well, this infectious came out of a wet market in Wuhan.
Well, if you actually go look at this wet market in Wuhan, it's not exactly the way that they were portraying it in the media.
When they typically say a wet market, what they're referring to is something that you fear in Africa, a place where they have a live animal market where they're slaughtering animals.
Enzyme Supplements for Digestion 00:02:21
It's very unsanitary conditions.
This seafood market in China, when I go look at pictures of it, it's very hygienic.
It's sanitary.
It's like this neighborhood is like the equivalent of the Upper East Side of New York.
This is not some dirty, grimy place.
I mean, this would be a place that I would go buy groceries or you would too.
So they're putting out this whole narrative that this is, this is the, this is where the disease emerged and just it's not adding up.
And every time I go fact check something, in the same city, there is an Institute of Virology.
The book is The Truth About Wuhan or Wuhan by Dr. Huff, How I Uncovered the Biggest Lie in History.
Look, did you know that your natural ability to digest food declines with age?
This is because your body produces fewer enzymes, which are proteins responsible for digesting food.
Fewer enzymes means more difficult actually digesting the food that you need.
This is especially true if you cook your food because cooking kills enzymes.
This is maybe why you have digestion problems even after eating a super healthy meal.
Your body just can't produce enough enzymes to get the job done.
This is where supplementing with a high-quality enzyme supplement can be a huge help.
I personally recommend Mass Symes from Buy Optimizers.
It's a best-in-class supplement with full-load spectrum enzymes for digesting proteins, starches, sugars, fibers, and fats.
Taking Mass Zymes daily helps top off your enzyme levels and replace the enzymes your body is no longer producing, which means you'll be able to eat all sorts of delicious foods and digest them quickly and effortlessly.
After you start taking Mass Zymes, you may notice that you're no longer feeling bloated after meals and that your belly feels flatter.
And if you have a leaky gut, Mass Symes could reduce gut irritation and help you absorb more nutrients.
If you want freedom from your food, especially during the holiday season, try Mass Symes risk-free and experience for yourself the magic of high-quality enzymes.
I use enzymes and you should as well.
For an exclusive offer for just you, go to masszymes.com slash Kirk.
It's like it sounds, M-A-S-S-Z-Y-M-E-S, and make sure to enter the code Kirk10 to receive 10% off your order.
That is masszymes.com slash Kirk, masszymes.com slash Kirk.
Criminal Epidemiologic Investigation 00:14:43
Let me play cut 30 here of your former colleague, Peter Dasik, play cut 30.
Coronavirus is a pretty good, I mean, neurovirologist, you know all this stuff, but they you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily.
Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk.
So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein, and we work with Ralph Barrack at UNC to do this.
Insert into backbone of another virus and do some work in the labs.
So Dr. Huff, is this the work that the EcoHealth Alliance was doing at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
Absolutely.
And they started doing it in 2012 or 2013, actually before I started working at Equal Health Alliance.
I reviewed the gain of function proposal to understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence, which was funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Health, the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Disease, NIAIDE.
And it was clear as day.
I actually released the documents or all my documents on Twitter today, AGHUFF, AG Huff on Twitter.
And your audience, yourself, you can go download and look at those.
And it is clear as day that this gain of function work happened at Equal Health Alliance.
Dr. Anthony Fauci and other people at NIH lied about it when they testified.
And unfortunately, what's happened is that the strategy or tactic used by either the intelligence community or all the COVID co-conspirators is that they've tried to make this a big debate about virology.
And it's not.
This is actually a criminal epidemiologic investigation.
That's what the FBI would call it.
I'm trained as an investigator by the FBI in this really niche sub-specialty.
And the more that they can make this complicated and difficult to understand, the more that people glaze over and it creates uncertainty about what the source of this virus really was.
And one of the key things that I do in my book, I got a copy of it right here, is that I discuss, in layman's terms, what happened.
So after I read Robert Kennedy's book, and it's an excellent book, I realized that a lot of this is just too technical and deep.
And you have to be older and more mature to understand the complexity of the relationships of all these different people, the government agencies.
And he does a phenomenal job of laying that all out.
I wanted to take the information that I had in my experience and make it digestible so that a high school student could understand what happened.
And my whole goal here is that if we're able to make everyone understand what really happened, hopefully we can prevent this from ever happening again in the future.
So Anthony Fauci says under oath, there was no gain of function research, play cut 31.
I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I'm fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China.
However, I will repeat again: the NIH and NIAD categorically has not funded gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Viral.
Is he lying?
Absolutely.
And it's on the specific AIMS page of the understanding of the emergence of bat coronavirus risk proposal.
The brilliance is, so Dr. Peter Dasik and I had a following up, but Dr. Dask and I used to write proposals together, presentations.
I actually loved writing with Peter.
He's an excellent writer.
He has, he knows rhetorical strategy very well.
He and I bonded over that actually.
And the way that he crafted the specific aims is so brilliant.
It never says gain of function once on that page, but it dances around what gain of function is.
It says it in so many other words without actually saying gain of function.
That's what these people do.
It's just so sick.
Well, and then it gets better.
So, not only do they avoid the issue whether or not it's gain of function, in historical context, there's a domestic ban on gain of function taking place.
So, it looks like it was purposely crafted to not get the attention of any reviewer as being gain of function work, but it's clear as data that it's gain of function.
They spell it exactly how they do it.
It actually began with a program before this NIH grant called USAID Predicts.
So, the United States Agency for International Development had this program called Predict, Metabiota, Hunter Biden.
That probably sounds familiar to your audience and to yourself, maybe.
They were our partners, along with UC Davis, and they were going around the planet sampling and looking for all these dangerous viruses.
And the idea was by going out and looking for these and hunting for these deadly bugs, that we would then be able to predict and forecast pandemics.
Well, after I'm promoted, I find out that that's not the case, they're not collecting enough samples, it's not routine or systematic.
There's significant or fatal flaws in the methods that they're using to be able to predict or forecast emerging infectious diseases.
And when I find this out, I mean, I'm shocked.
The guy who's in charge of the program, his name is Dr. Dennis Carroll at USAID.
He's now in charge of the Global Virum Project, I believe.
And, you know, they're running around telling everyone, asking for millions of dollars that, hey, we're going to go forecast this stuff.
But no.
Let me ask you: did you ever personally visit Wuhan?
No, I didn't.
I've never been to Wuhan.
Never been to China, actually.
I've been to Asia, but not to China.
But when I was promoted to the Predict program, I actually was the country coordinator for Jordan and Sudan.
We're looking for a related virus called Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome.
It's a type of coronavirus in bats there.
And when I started to understand as an executive how we are managing biosecurity and bio-risk from an organizational or enterprise viewpoint, I was concerned.
And I actually raised these concerns at executive meetings.
You know, it's really difficult to understand what's going or happening in the daily operations or functioning of a bio lab unless you have your own people working there and reporting it.
You really have to put a lot of trust into these other laboratories and the people that are running those laboratories when you're a different content and away across an ocean.
And to go along with that, so going back to the understanding of the risk of back coronavirus emergence proposal that was funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIH to EcoHealth Alliance and its partners, Dr. Ralph Barrick and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, there's a page on there that everyone had to submit in my field.
It's called the select agent form.
So when you're doing infectious disease research, you have to basically say whether or not you get to report whether or not it applies essentially.
And everything on this select agent form is a liar or an obfuscation by a mission.
So basically, they're supposed to detail whether or not they're doing in this gain of function work.
They don't say that they're doing this gain of function work, but all throughout the proposal, it basically lays out the gain of function work that they're doing.
And the worst part is under NIH regulation or policy, the principal investigator, that being Dr. Dask, is responsible for any work that happens or is conducted with that funding, meaning he's ultimately responsible for anything that happens at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Well, what you're supposed to have in place is something called a biological safety officer and an institutional biosafety committee to conduct this kind of research at your institution, this institution being Equal Health Alliance.
Well, we didn't have a biological safety officer.
We didn't have an institutional biosafety committee.
And furthermore, then they break the law again on this form.
And down in the small print at the bottom, they say basically say that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is going to be conducting all this work.
So we don't have to be worried about it.
But that's a direct violation of NIH policy.
You're not allowed to do that.
So how this work even gets approved in the first place, I don't know.
And when this proposal was handed to me, I was new at Equal Health Alliance.
I had probably only been there a month or two.
And why they asked me to look at this thing, I really don't even understand why at this point.
It had already been funded.
Maybe they're trying to see whether or not it passed the SNF test, whether I thought it was going to go against the guidelines that this type of research was banned domestically.
But that's beside the point because my boss still agreed to do this.
It's highly unethical.
And that's another thing.
So in NIH policy and guidelines, it says that the principal investigator is conducting or would be engaging in an ethical violation by agreeing to do this work without having the biological security or safety officer or the institutional biosafety committee.
So there's all these problems, but somehow this thing still gets approved.
And it blows my mind.
So let's talk about the leak itself from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
What do you know about how that virus got outside the walls and eventually made itself to patient zero?
Do you talk about that in the book?
This is something that has always remained a mystery to me.
I do.
And this came to light really in the past year.
I mean, so the scientific, I'd say, consensus, and I hate saying that term because the scientific consensus has now been basically destroyed by maniacs like Dr. Anthony Fauci who say that I am the science.
I mean, it's ridiculous.
Most scientific studies can't be replicated.
I mean, that's important for your audience to know.
In the media, oftentimes they point to this.
This one study has the answer.
Well, they call this the replication crisis.
The vast majority of medical studies cannot be replicated.
The field that I'm an expert in is epidemiology.
And the first cases of this disease emerge in Wuhan in late August or early September of 2019.
It's been replicated independently by different scientists using different data sources.
It looks like those first cases spread to Europe.
So it doesn't, we don't know who patient zero is.
Likely, or most probably, it was a laboratory worker at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that was working and lax biosafety conditions, not having the proper, working at the proper biosafety level for the dangerous things that they were working with.
Then what happens is the Chinese government goes into panic buying mode, trying to buy containment equipment to get control of the leak.
So they figure out quickly that there's a leak happening.
They're like, well, okay, well, you know, we have to plug the leak.
And so they start buying all sorts of things.
But the disease is already spreading around the planet by this point.
And they actually institute a series of lockdown measures to start panic buying PPE from all over the globe.
And all this is happening while this disease is spreading.
And the U.S. government, at least, isn't notifying the American people.
I mean, I find it almost impossible to believe based on what I used to do for the government developing these type of technologies to detect these types of types of events that they didn't know.
And, you know, people talk about event 201.
Well, I think event 201 was actually the world sort of conditioning everyone for about what was to happen.
So I think some people were in the know that this disease was already spreading and they were trying to figure out how they could get ahead of it.
Actually used to conduct uh tabletop exercises as a public.
Do you believe the leak of the virus was intentional or unintentional?
I think all the evidence um, and I talk about this in the book and I go into detail of it.
So this is a type of intelligence analysis called a scenario analysis.
You don't have all the facts, but you have a lot of circumstantial evidence and you have some hard facts.
And then you have to look at the people and you say well, what people on the planet would want to do this?
Why would they want to do that intentionally act and what are the other potential scenarios that it could be and why would they engage in one versus the other?
So for this to be an intentional event, it doesn't make sense, and that's for a number of reasons.
So first of all, you have to realize China has some um suffered tremendously through this.
The Chinese people have um the.
The Chinese Communist Party did not benefit from this.
Everyone says oh, China got rich off this.
Actually, the Chinese uh gross domestic product shrank um just like everybody else's uh during covet um, you could argue, well, the Chinese uh communists probably wanted to do this for control.
But actually, if you look at the stated uh, intentions and objectives of the Chinese Communist Party.
They wanted to increase their enrollment of party members, I think uh, up to 10 million in China.
They want to have greater dominance and control.
So intentionally, for the Chinese to intentionally release an agent in their own country is suicide, especially if you don't have an effective countermeasure for it.
I mean, that's the whole way bioweapons typically work.
You only use one if you have the countermeasures.
That doesn't come back onto your home turf.
So this whole idea that it was intentionally released, I don't, I don't buy it.
I haven't seen the evidence for it.
Um, you know, another possible potential thing is it could be a false flag.
Well or, people said the United States put it in China.
Well, I don't believe that either, because there is no faster way to start a global nuclear war than releasing a pandemic potential novel virus in another country.
I mean it it it, it's just, it's not fathomable.
And whether the agent or not is a bioweapon.
Well yes, it's a bioweapon by traditional uh, like sort of textbook definition if you analyze it.
They did, they took an infectious agent, they did gain a function, work on it.
Um, they made it worse.
Okay uh, was it dual use, research of concern.
Can it be used for peaceful or weaponized purposes?
Yes, but as a bioweapon itself, it's not a good bioweapon, because it doesn't knock your enemy flat on the ground, it doesn't debilitate them.
You could argue that it is potentially a new asymmetrical bioweapon, when I sort of came up with that while I was writing the book, because you could say, well, it's like a bioterrorism agent or attack, where it instills a lot of fear in the population, but it doesn't have the effect of uh crippling.
And what that fear does, though, is it allows you to assume more power control and maybe a potential aspect of economic warfare.
But like I say, it doesn't really do that very well if it harms everyone on the planet, including yourself.
OK, so if if that's if that's correct and it was unintentional, then why was China and still China so, so hostile towards any sort of international investigation into the origins or investigation?
Why did doctors disappear and whistleblowers were excommunicated?
Wouldn't they just open it up and say, yeah, this thing leaked.
Chernobyl Legacy Box Analogy 00:04:01
No, I don't think so.
And so the other thing about the Chinese kind of answers.
There's a simple analogy here, which will help you understand.
So Chernobyl.
So when Chernobyl happens, the Soviets realize, you know, first of all, internally at Chernobyl itself, they're denying whether or not an explosion took place.
Then the next thing that happens, they're denying to the rest of the Soviet Republic that there is a terrible radioactive disaster taking place to their own people.
That's how communism works.
And actually, they kept on messaging that at Chernobyl until it gets to the point where radioactive isotopes are picked up by Western scientists or NATO scientists in Western Europe.
So if you look at the behavior of one former communist country organization, and then you compare it as an analogy to what happened in Wuhan, it's almost exactly the same thing.
The whole tactic is you actually lose more credibility as the Chinese Communist Party by having the leak take place.
I mean, nothing would be a bigger threat to the Chinese Communist Party than everyone in China finding out that their own country got them sick, killed millions of their own people.
And that's why we're seeing the revolt on the streets.
I think the Chinese are even starting to figure out what the heck's going on, and they're not happy about it.
And so this crazy thing about, I guess, 2022, 2023, where we're headed, is that we're seeing this global power struggle erupt over this laboratory leak disease where the global elite, and I sound like Alex Jones now, I never thought, you know, I'd be saying things like he used to say a year or two ago.
The global elite and the wealthiest families on the planet have taken, you know, used their power and influence to really dominate the future economic conditions, which we exist or they're trying to.
And this is the power play that we see playing out all over the globe right now in different countries.
Dr. Andrew Huff, stay here.
I have more questions.
I'm not convinced.
I'll be honest.
I think the CCP, too many people benefited from this.
I'll be honest.
It was too convenient.
It was foreshadowed far too often from Gates.
And it could just be confirmation bias.
And that's fine.
It's just, it was so perfect.
It destroyed the Western economy.
It got Donald Trump out of the White House.
Now, it could be it was a bad thing that was capitalized by bad people.
That's the other explanation.
That's what I believe.
No, that's fine.
That's a reasonable thing.
I just, I have such, I have so little trust in anything that I hear that you'll leave it at that.
Instead of saying that it was a mistake, I think that it's not implausible, in my opinion, that somebody might have made the Wuhan Institute of Virology standards sloppier than they need to be.
And it's almost, there's another thing about this that never really resonated.
It's that, yes, the virus wasn't a bioweapon.
And wouldn't that be an easier way to justify it to yourself?
That it would just kill the old and not the young.
Think about that.
Check out Legacy Box.
They're an amazing company.
We've worked with them for quite some time.
We've personally used Legacy Box in many different ways.
And I know people whose house burned down, they lose family memories and pictures.
They never get them back.
I said, why didn't you use Legacy Box?
And they said, you know, Charlie, you've been talking about it for quite some time.
I should have.
They're filled with regret, guilt, and remorse.
But you could check it out at legacybox.com slash Kirk.
You could digitize your past, put it on the cloud.
It's trusted by over 1 million families.
1 million families.
Legacybox.com slash Kirk.
That is legacybox.com slash Kirk for a limited time offer of 40% and discover the magic of bringing your past back to life.
I love Legacy Box.
I love what they stand for.
I love their mission.
I love their team.
I love their sophistication.
I love their technology.
So check it out right now.
Legacybox.com slash Kirk.
So, doctor, in some ways, it really doesn't matter.
In some ways, it really is important of whether or not it was leaked intentionally or unintentionally.
Redacted Emails and Funding 00:05:14
But it is important in the sense that the American government was funding this research that then ended up killing hundreds of thousands of Americans and basically changing our world forever.
Oh, absolutely.
And after I leave Equal Health Alliance in 2016, it doesn't stop.
I don't know if you're familiar with the DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency diffuse proposal, which was leaked to Charles Rixie.
And Charles Rixie and I have been friends.
He's a former former Marine Corps weapons and mass destruction officer and expert.
And you go into that proposal and they write in that proposal specifically everything that you would need to do to exactly make and manufacture SARS-CoV-2 as it's leaked.
And if you actually look at the unredacted emails that have been released in the last tranche of emails that were released from Dr. Anthony Fauci or NIH, they talk about, you know, there's a couple of email sentences in the click about like, oh, it looks like, you know, the Chinese were doing the project that we are working on.
Well, here's a simple fact that your audience needs to know.
The best scientists in the world get these big grants and contracts from the U.S. government or foundations by doing the work before you receive the money.
And it's a condition of receiving an NIH, what's called an R01, which is the best grant you get as an individual principal investigator or a U01 multi-center proposal or grant from NIH, that you have to have preliminary data and results to justify them giving you the money.
Well, typically you've already got a year to two years of work done on the project before NIH even gives you the money.
So you can start publishing on this thing the second you get the money.
Sometimes you already have.
Sometimes you're just sitting on it waiting for the opportune or strategic moment to do it.
I witnessed all these things at Eagle Health Alliance.
We used to work ahead all the time.
If you go ask any great scientist in any discipline outside of medicine, my wife works in forestry.
She's a forestry professor.
She has two to three years of funding lined up and she's constantly or continually working ahead because just because someone doesn't give you a grant or a contract doesn't mean that you stop working.
And you know, you're best where the best chances of getting more money is having something new and exciting to work on.
The way you do that is by working ahead.
So when DARPA says we didn't fund the diffuse proposal, what do you think really went on?
I mean, do you think that they weren't working ahead to get the money?
Going back to 2014, when they were working on the gain of function, that coronavirus emergency proposal, they state clearly, and like I said, you can go look at the document yourself.
I have the original copy.
They were working ahead and doing the gain of function work with samples they had coronavirus samples they had collected with China.
And they did that with USAID Predict.
So this is just a continuation and this was a disaster waiting to happen.
Like I said before, they didn't, Equal Health Alliance didn't have the proper bio-risk management framework in place to make sure that accidents or disasters like this didn't happen.
And then if this is coupled with, and I talk about this in the book, that there are a number of cables from the State Department and the FDA that had been in this laboratory and they're talking about what a biosecurity risk or nightmare this is.
And those are the unclassified reports.
I can only imagine that there's probably more classified communications about this.
Usually it's like surveillance violence.
You find a little bit of it.
Well, how much more of the real thing is hidden somewhere with a classification stamp on it?
And what helps me put this into context is that, you know, because I did work in the top secret side of these things and I can't talk about that.
But what it does do is it informs my ability to put things into context.
And the U.S. government's a huge beast.
The classified space is a huge beast.
And I firmly believe a lot of what the intelligence community and the Department of Defense does protects us and keeps us safe.
It's not that we need to get rid of it.
You know, the problem is when there are disasters like this and people go into panic mode, if the government decides to do a cover-up, how do you ever find out about it?
I mean, none of these emails between Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Eco Health Alliance, and these private foundations should be redacted.
I mean, this is academic research, which was safe reportedly.
funded through a research entity and they're redacting names off of emails and the content of emails.
Why?
I mean, why would you ever need to, can you imagine universities having to redact information about research they're doing?
I mean, that's essentially what happened here.
And the reason why they do that is simple.
They're covering up the biggest disaster in history.
It's a huge cover-up, as your book says.
The truth about Wuhan by Dr. Andrew Huff.
Thank you so much.
Excellent job.
Thank you.
This is fun.
Thank you.
Everybody, email us, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Get your tickets to America Fest Today.
That is amf.com, amfest.com, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Greg Gutfeld, and more.
Check it out.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk. com.
Export Selection