2000 Mules Redux with Dinesh D'Souza and Anna Paulina Luna
2000 Mules was a hit movie this summer. Now, Dinesh D'Souza has released it in book form, with more data and more detail explaining his theory of how Democrats gamed drop boxes and illegal ballot harvesting in the 2020 Election. Then, Charlie exposes Karl Rove's sinister effort to sabotage Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania and TPUSA alum Anna Paulina Luna stops by to discuss her hotly-contested House race in Florida's 13th.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
The 2000 Mules Book00:09:57
Hey, everybody.
Today in the Charlie Kirk show, Dinesh D'Souza and Ana Paulina Luna join us.
Dinesh talking about 2000 Mules, the book, and Ana Paulina, one of our favorite candidates running for office.
You guys can support her at voteanapaulina.com.
As always, you can email me your thoughts, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk Show and hit subscribe.
Let's open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk Show and hit subscribe.
Get involved with Turning Point USA.
Turning Point USA is on the front lines to save America.
Everyone listening to this needs to support or get involved with Turning Point USA any way you can, as well as start a Turning Point USA chapter, tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
As always, you can email me, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
For personalized loan services, you can count on.
Go to AndrewandTodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandodd.com.
Look, many of you have seen the movie 2000 Mules.
I highly encourage you to look at it.
It's a great movie.
It's very well researched.
It's come under mass attack from the media and from the press.
And the mastermind behind the film joins us now, and he has a book summarizing all of it.
And it's also thanks to the research done by the great organization, True the Vote.
Dinesh joins us right now.
Dinesh, welcome back to the program.
Charlie, great to be back.
Always a pleasure.
Dinesh, tell us about the book, which some people might be interested or curious: how is it different than the movie?
Walk us through it.
The movie is a 90-minute narrative of what really happened in the 2020 election.
And there are some aspects in the movie that can't be duplicated in a book.
So, for example, the movie has surveillance video.
Obviously, there's no way for me to pluck that video and stick it in a book.
The book has photos and images, but it doesn't have video.
On the other hand, books can do certain things that movies can't.
And so, a book can, almost like a legal brief, lay out a systematic argument at a far greater level of explanation and detail.
It can provide a lot of evidentiary backup, crossing the T's and dotting the I's.
And the other thing that this book has is it has a systematic refutation of the critics of the movie.
So it goes beyond 2000 Mules and it answers people like Ali Swenson of AP, Philip Bump of The Washington Post, Tom Dreisbach at National Public Radio, many of the prominent sort of debunkers of 2000 Mules.
Not to mention, by the way, Liz Cheney and Bill Barr.
All of them come under scrutiny and under fire in the book.
Well, I'm glad to hear that.
So, Dinesh, I just want to make sure our audience is processing this correctly, which is: never are you saying do not vote, especially as we are this close to an election.
Because obviously, you're calling into question the practice, the zucker boxes, the mules, and the need for election integrity.
But I do just want to make sure we emphasize every person in this audience should vote as securely as possible.
Is that correct?
Absolutely.
It's critical that we vote.
And I think the real goal of 2000 Mules, I mean, it was obviously aimed at getting some law enforcement follow-up and strengthening voter integrity laws and really giving the GOP something that it can look into if it wins the House and the Senate in the midterm election.
But I think the most important thing, job of the film and the book is just to make people aware, because it's difficult to pull off a heist of any kind when people already know about it.
If I were to tell you, Charlie, that there's a bank in Phoenix that's going to be robbed on Saturday at 7 p.m., it's going to be really hard for the bad guys to go, yeah, at 7 p.m., let's go, because people now know about it.
They're going to be sort of looking for it.
So, no, I think that what's happened is that the awareness of the movie has been helpful.
Obviously, more Republicans have also gotten involved as poll watchers and poll judges, that kind of thing.
And this is a wonderful opportunity for us to promote voter integrity by exercising our right to vote and then bringing in, by the way, elected representatives who can take a hard look at this issue.
So, Dinesh, there have been some attacks recently.
For example, the Attorney General of Arizona is now asking the federal government to investigate True the Vote, your partner in this, the great Greg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht.
What do you make of this with the Attorney General of Arizona that is now focused on investigating True the Vote, not actually looking into the mule operation?
Help us make sense of this.
So it's a very strange phenomenon, right?
Because many of the areas covered in the movie are under heavy Democratic control.
It would not be reasonable to expect these Democrats to jump up and go, let's quickly investigate.
But one would expect that in areas under some Republican control, I'm thinking here of Georgia, for example, or Mark Bernovich in Arizona, that there would be some follow-up.
And the beauty of follow-up is it can prove either side to be wrong.
So, for example, maybe Bernovich goes and talks to the mules, his investigators talk to them, and there's a perfectly plausible explanation for what they're doing.
So, in that sense, the movie would then be refuted.
Look, there's nothing fun, no funny business going on.
But it's very interesting that none of those people, and certainly the left, does not want any follow-up.
They are not willing to take the risk that they might be discredited and that the mules might start talking and squawking and reveal who paid them, how is this operation all organized and so on.
Now, True the Vote had ongoing dealings with Bernovich's office.
And at some point, it appears that communication broke down.
Now, I'm not privy to what was said back and forth, but what True the Vote says is, listen, we gave them information, we gave them data.
Far from investigating our information, they started, in a sense, revealing our confidential sources.
It became clear to us, meaning to true the vote, that they were less interested in busting the fraud than in busting the fraud detection operation.
And so, true the vote then loses confidence in the attorney general's office.
Bernovich, of course, finds that his own political future is torpedoed.
There's probably some bitterness in the office.
And so, I interpret the latest missive, the latest letter, as a lashing out at True the Vote.
In my view, Bernovich made a huge tactical mistake.
Had he embraced this issue and looked into it, it might have helped him in his Senate campaign.
In fact, we might be using the phrase Senator Bernovich after November, but it's not going to be.
Do you anticipate True the Vote will publish all of the data?
I know that was a promise that was made by Greg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht.
Do you anticipate that happening, Dinesh?
Because there are some people that are waiting for a lot more footage and pings.
What's your anticipation of that?
Well, True, the vote said that they would release all the data, pulling the ripcord, I think was their term for it.
Got to realize that I partnered with True the Vote for the purpose of making the film.
I didn't have a prior affiliation with them, and so I don't have really any direct control over them to that degree.
I know that Greg Phillips, in particular, is very concerned about the issue of security and hacking and doxing and his investigators' names being revealed.
And so, for whatever reason, they haven't fully done that yet.
And at one point, I think Greg Phillips was talking about going abroad to set up a sort of infrastructure where their information couldn't be taken down.
So, all of this falls a little beyond the purview of the book and the film.
But I do think that in any such operation, more transparency, more data, more public visibility is always a good thing.
Yeah, and the arguments that are made in the book is very simple, but it's that there was a mass mail-in ballot surge, a surplus, and there was a paid incentive, quasi-drug-like operation where people were paid to then scoop up mail-in ballots and quote unquote launder them through the mail-in-ballot zucker boxes.
So, Dinesh, I want to ask you: do you think that enough changes have been made for people to be able to have faith again in our elections?
Everyone, check out the new book, 2000 Mules, which is the book version of the movie, but with a lot more data, a lot more information, refutations from the Apparatchi Mockingbird media.
Check it out, 2000 Mules by Dinesh D'Souza.
Check out the book right now.
Charlie Kirk here.
Look, I've told you about producer Andrew and how Relief Factor has really improved his life and relieved the pain in his knees and back.
Now, let me tell you about Yvonne in California.
She says this: Both my husband and I are in our 70s and so grateful to have found Relief Factor.
We tried so many other solutions, but none of them have given us the freedom from aches and pains like Relief Factor.
I hear Yvonne, Relief Factor works for me too.
Relief Factor is a 100% drug-free solution developed by doctors based on scientific research to help your body attack the underlying inflammation causing you pain.
Voting Process Rules00:05:42
Three weeks from now, you could be doing the things you enjoy doing.
Your first step to becoming pain-free could be just to order the three-week quick start for only $19.95.
After trying Relief Factor, over half a million people have gone on to order more.
Go to relieffactor.com or call 8004RELIEF to find out more about this offer.
That's relieffactor.com or call 8004Relief.
Live your best life and feel the difference with Relief Factor.
Do you think enough changes have been made in states, for example, like Pennsylvania to prevent this?
Do you see any improvements at all?
Walk us through that.
I think that there have been some voter integrity laws which do some decent things, although, in my view, not enough.
There has been more surveillance this time on the Dropboxes than there was in 2020, but again, not enough.
The CISA rules, the cybersecurity infrastructure agency rules, call for every Dropbox to have 24-hour surveillance.
That is clearly not the case.
In fact, the reason some patriots are like camping out at Dropboxes is because they don't see the video surveillance that should be there on every Dropbox.
I think that this is an issue that still needs to be investigated because although we do need to move on from 2020, we can't move on without a full reckoning of what happened in 2020.
Like I mentioned the last time, there are more Republicans who are getting involved in the process.
I think Republicans realize that we pay attention to the campaign.
Democrats pay attention to who's actually running the election, who's administering and organizing the election process.
So we're becoming more attentive to that.
So bottom line, I think that there is greater awareness.
Things are looking better than they were in 2020, but there's still a ways to go, certainly before 2024.
Yeah, and Mark Elias is in court right now in Arizona alleging voter intimidation, which we do not support, but we do support people to use their constitutional rights to be able to observe elections and to be able to see whether or not there is fraudulent activity occurring.
For example, we are seeing on the front lines, people show up to try to be election workers.
And Dinesh, why are there not cameras watching this?
Isn't it against the law?
So the government doesn't follow the law and nobody cares.
Is that right?
I mean, we live at a time when every parking lot, every Home Depot, every post office, every mall is under surveillance.
The cost of that is infinitesimal.
There's no reason not to do it.
So there'd be no need for citizens or patriots to do it if they followed the rules.
That's all they have to do.
So I think it's disturbing that there is on the voting process alone, things are said about voting that in every other context are preposterous.
So in any other context, nobody says that airlines are engaging in travel suppression because they're asking you for an ID or banks are engaged in banking suppression because you got to show an ID when you cash a check.
But in the voting context, if you ask for an ID, well, that's racist.
You're suppressing, you're intimidating voters and so on.
So I think we need the insistence by the GOP on this kind of commonsensical logic throughout the voting process, because that's a process I think that has been greatly tarnished over the years, and particularly with the mail-in ballots, which are the most vulnerable forms of voting that there are.
Cut 48.
Some folks are asked, what are they doing watching ballots?
They said, we're out here getting vitamin D. Play Cut 48.
We're just out here watching boxes.
And before I make any kind of statement or anything, I'd like to get in the sun camp, getting some vitamin D.
So you're getting vitamin D or you're watching the drop boxes?
Both.
Dinesh, because we don't trust these drop boxes, it creates more cynicism and creates more distrust of our system.
Why is it that red states haven't gotten rid of these drop boxes altogether?
I'm not really sure.
I don't know if they were, they got a little bit of whiplash from COVID and they decided that they had to be to allow these things to go on.
We've had very sleepy legislative responses, even in Republican states, where they're in a position to do something about all this.
In the end, the Constitution gives states the power to make these rules.
And so sometimes I'll say things like, let's get back to a single election day where everyone shows up to vote.
But in the back of my mind, I know that when you have a diversity of laws being passed by different states, some states are going to continue to have drop boxes.
So Republicans need to have a plan in states that they don't control for dealing with these drop boxes.
And quite frankly, in places like California, where they allow ballot harvesting, hey, you can go to a liberal church and collect ballots and then bring them to the Dropbox and drop them in.
I would say in those cases, Republicans should do the same.
Go to the evangelical churches, go to the Vietnamese community, go out and collect the ballots because it's allowed under California law.
Don't let the Democrats beat you at a game.
If they make the rules in that particular case, play by those rules.
That's well said.
Dinesh, thank you so much for joining us.
Check out his new book, 2000 Meals, which is the sister to the wonderful movie that I was in.
Dinesh, thank you so much.
A pleasure.
Thank you.
I want to tell you about one of the most important organizations in the country created by co-founder of the Home Depot, Bernie Marcus.
Grassroots Momentum Wins00:14:53
The folks at Job Creators Network defend and advance policies that help small business owners across America grow their business.
We talk a lot about labor in the media, and we're always responding to the complaints of labor.
And that's fine, obviously, it's important.
But who actually creates the jobs that labor actually is able to enjoy?
Big business has their lobbyists, but small ones don't always have the time or money to defend themselves against the forces of global corporations and their crony capitalist pals in the kingdom of Washington, D.C. Job Creators Network, that's right, Job Creators Network, fights for small business owners across America, and they're looking for a few good men and women to join their growing army of small business advocates.
They'll train you to be the face and voice of Main Street in your communities and beyond.
To learn more, go to jobcreatorsnetwork.com.
That is jobcreatorsnetwork.com.
Small business is the heartbeat, the backbone, the lifeblood of our economy and the American dream.
Learn how you can join this growing army of advocates.
Go to jobcreatorsnetwork.com now and hit the red join button.
If you are a small business owner, if you're involved, go to jobcreatorsnetwork.com.
That is jobcreatorsnetwork.com.
There's a very important race in Florida that we've been covering and just watching.
And she actually was part of Turning Point for quite some time.
And we visited campuses together.
In fact, one of the most viral clips we've ever done was Ana Paulina Luna and I sitting at Portland State University with all of these communists and Marxists.
And it's been so much fun to see Ana Paulina now grow into what looks to be right on the precipice of becoming a congresswoman.
That's Ana Paulina Luna, APL, and possibly against AOC.
That will be really fun.
Ana, welcome to the program.
So glad to be back on, Charlie.
So tell us about your race.
How are things looking?
There's been a lot of money being spent against you.
You're a young candidate with a fresh vision.
America first always.
Tell us about your race.
So I can tell you this: nothing will win elections other than knocking doors and putting in the elbow grease.
And that's really where we've been at.
I am running in Florida's 13th congressional district.
So although it is an open Republican seat, the gentleman that I'm running against is actually someone who was Obama's speechwriter and has actually been solely funded by a super PAC, actually, out of Dearborn, Michigan, who has a guy who's not only connected to Perkins Cooey.
So for those who might not know who that is, that's the law firm that actually cooked up the steel dossier for Hillary Clinton, Soros, and of course the Obama.
So we are beating them right now on the ground game with door knocking, but I can tell you that I'm feeling the momentum.
We're feeling the energy.
And two days ago, actually, Governor DeSantis ended up endorsing us.
Well, that's amazing.
And I know we have an event coming up in Clearwater, St. Petersburg area.
It's tpaction.com/slash DeSantis.
I will be there to get out the vote rally for you, Ana.
So talk, what are the top issues that you are seeing on the ground?
You know, inflation, crime.
What are you hearing from voters as you campaign across the great state of Florida?
The number one issue right now is the economy.
So many people cannot essentially afford to continue on this 8% inflation.
A lot of people are actually getting priced out of the Tampa Bay area because, God bless Governor DeSantis, but he's been the result of many people moving from some of these blue states because of the fact that they want to be in a red state with a strong governor like him.
And so there's a lot of people coming in from California and New York into the Tampa Bay area.
But I'd say the economy is number one.
And then also, too, people are genuinely afraid of what's happening right now with the weaponization of the DOJ and the FBI.
And so, what we're finding is not just in my race, but across the country, there's been this anomaly with polling where Republicans aren't wanting to take the polls.
But to put it in perspective, in the primary, I was at a statistical tie, according to many pollsters.
And I won by 11 points because that's that silent majority that's coming out and showing up in force voting at the polls.
Yeah, I don't trust any of these polls at all.
And I think that you have a huge grassroots momentum and there's so much money being spent against you.
Ana, talk about that if you get to Congress, you are going to be a pro-freedom, pro-American, reasonable voice to the radical AOC.
I think the Democrats are fearful that if you get to Congress, you're going to be a counter to this nonsense that we've seen from the left talk about that.
100%.
In fact, I'm so much so a threat that they've actually pivoted to a media strategy that I've only really, I think, witnessed done actively in one other race, and that was in Byron Donald's for a long time, that the media did not actually want to cover him, especially some of these leftist media outlets.
But they've almost gone for full-fledged media blackouts.
So they're not even reporting on a lot of the endorsements.
I had the Attorney General of Florida endorse me.
They didn't report on it.
In fact, they did the exact opposite and tried to tie me to Pablo Escobar, which I started laughing because, as you know, Pablo Escobar is dead.
And of course, you know, leave it to the leftist, you know, racially charged media to try to make that connection.
But, you know, I'm Mexican.
Pablo is Colombian.
But, you know, when I'm seeing what's happening, I'm very proud to say that I was endorsed by the House Freedom Caucus and invited to join them once elected.
And I will be joining the Freedom Caucus.
They are one of the constitutional conservative factions of Washington, D.C.
And they really hold, I think, I call them the conscience of the Republican Party.
You know, I'm very proud to say that I'm largely funded by people dollar and not special interests.
And that's not going to change.
I'm not going to D.C. to become someone.
I'm going to make a change.
And I do believe that that is going to help kind of have us as conservatives shape the culture.
And so there's a lot of young voices coming in.
There's Carolyn Levitt in New Hampshire, one.
There's Bo Hines in North Carolina, 13.
And I'm going to be working with these people to help push back against a lot of the indoctrination that we're seeing with our young people.
Yeah, Bo Hines is in a very tough race as well.
I think he's going to pull it off and get across the finish line.
Ana, how can people support your campaign?
If you can, we need door knockers, phone bankers.
If you're out of state, you can do that.
But also, too, please consider making a donation.
$5, $10, $20.
It all goes directly to my campaign.
You know, I'm not Ilhan Omar.
I'm not paying my husband.
So head over to voteapl.com.
Please consider making that donation.
And we're actually really excited for our event on November 5th.
It's going to be really great.
tpaction.com slash DeSantis Ana.
Keep campaigning.
We're 100% behind you.
Keep it up.
Talk to you soon.
Thank you.
Thank you.
God bless.
Email us freedom at charliekirk.com.
So you see a candidate like Ana Paulina, Hispanic, young, articulate, has a message, has a vision.
She should be receiving lots of support from the Republican establishment, but she's not getting nearly enough.
Instead, the support is running ads to prop up Shapiro in the Pennsylvania governor's race at the expense of Fetterman.
That's right.
The new strategy of the Republican establishment in Pennsylvania is to throw the amazing leader, Doug Mastriano, under the bus, throw him in front of the train and just say, well, we'd rather have Oz than Oz and Mastriano.
It's too big of a risk.
And so I don't know what cut this is.
We're going to play it in a second, but it's an ad that is running on local Pennsylvania television that is basically saying that Fetterman is more radical on crime than Shapiro.
What?
Play this tape.
I'm actually a Democrat.
I'm running on my record on crime.
John Fetterman's record on crime is crazy.
He's not like most Democrats.
Dozens of times, he was the only vote to parting criminals.
225 times, Josh Shapiro voted against the criminals.
But Fetterman voted to release them.
That's nuts.
Fetterman's way more radical than Shapiro.
What's wrong with this guy?
American Crossroads is responsible for the content of this advertising.
This should make your blood boil.
I want to just read what that was.
This is a pro-Shapiro, anti-Fetterman advertisement that Shapiro has voted against criminals 225 times, but John Fetterman has it.
They are trying to make Mastriano lose just to make Oz win.
This is the Republican establishment.
This is from American Crossroads.
They've spent more than $4 million on this race.
And this is happening in races all across the country.
They spent money, for example, against Caroline Levitt, New Hampshire in the primary.
They're spending money against Shabaka in Alaska.
And I just want to say, if you are donating to these national senatorial campaigns, you are supporting this.
And you might be.
You might say, oh, I would never give money to them.
Be careful.
They're very, very sneaky the way they send the emails and they say it's for this committee and it goes to that.
Donate directly to campaigns and candidates if you donate at all and they need your help.
Go to the campaigns that they are actually promoting, the good guys.
I mean, go into the websites that they're actually promoting.
This strategy is nauseating.
I have never seen this strategy before.
I mean, I've seen some candidates, you know, say, oh, I'm going to run this way and run that way and kind of be quiet about it.
I have never seen an advertisement where you are boosting the Democrat to try to get a Republican elected.
That's exactly what's happening in Pennsylvania.
They want Mastriano to lose so bad that they are running pro-Shapiro, anti-Fetterman advertisement.
This is a massive betrayal.
It's going to backfire too, by the way.
A lot of MAGA voters are going to say, I'm not going to vote at all for Oz because of this.
Oz is not involved in this directly.
This is a super PAC.
He's legally not allowed to be involved in this.
This is really bad stuff, everybody.
It's a political action committee, so Oz has no fingerprints on this in particular.
I mean, an individual.
It's just an outside group.
Doug Mastriano is an American hero.
He's a lieutenant colonel.
He's a great American.
He's fighting for every single inch.
And instead of the Republican Party just being neutral, no, you have Republican groups that are literally running ads against him.
Not just ads against him, boosting his opponent, Shapiro.
Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast.
This is happening in many different places.
Proxy wars are starting to pop up.
And you might have thought the proxy wars were done.
You know what's so funny is the turtle and the senate leaders and the Republican establishment are always telling us, come on, MAGA people, come on, conservative base.
Come on, guys.
Why can't we just unite?
Why can't we just unite?
How often do we have to hear that from Republicans?
Come on, let's join forces.
It's time to all get on the same team.
And I'm like, yeah, okay, great.
Yeah, terrific.
Let's do that.
And by the way, I'm a team player.
I want that.
But then it's, they actually don't believe it.
They don't want to be on the team with MAGA and the conservative base.
Now, one of the reasons why Carrie Lake is able to withstand this and rise above it is she's just such an unbelievably good candidate.
She's so artistic.
I'm not saying Mastriano isn't, but I'll just say this.
Carrie Lake is more charismatic than Mastriano.
That's just a fact.
Okay.
Carrie Lake's been on television 30 years, and she has a movement unlike anything I've ever seen.
And Mitch McConnell pulls off, pulls out funding for Blake Masters.
McConnell pulls out funding for Baldick.
It's happening all across the country.
It's very serious.
So what do we do about it?
Stop donating to these people and then donate to the right people.
You're right.
It's Karl Rogue's PAC.
Somebody said name names.
I did do that before.
This is Carl Rogues PAC that is running anti-Mastriano ads and pro-Shapiro ads.
Email me directly, freedom at charliekirk.com.
This is a great point here.
Charlie, I'm wondering if anyone has wondered why the Democrats are not panicking.
Starting to look like 2020, where the Democrats are up to something, and we the people need to be ready for this.
What's your thoughts?
I think that's very smart.
I'm in a position of just caution.
We can't be too cocky.
We can't be too confident.
I do think there's a lot of good trends.
I think it's going our way, but we have to have election workers.
We have to have poll watchers.
Lisa makes a good point.
She says, Charlie, come on, give me a break.
Calling it a massive betrayal.
They're rhinos.
That's what they do.
They betray.
That's a good point, Lisa.
I have no disagreement.
But just for some of our new listeners, maybe they need to hear about the betrayal of the Republican establishment against what could be Pennsylvania's greatest governor.
Mastriano would be an amazing governor.
By the way, Mastriano can win.
Why would you then run ads against Mastriano to boost Shapiro just to boost Oz?
Do you think that's going to have a consolidated front?
How do you think we're going to win?
For anyone that wants to win the White House in 2024, how are we going to win the White House with a Democrat governor of Pennsylvania?
It'll make it a lot more difficult.
Jerry says, Isn't that packed throwing Mastriano under the bus run by Karl Rove?
Yes, it is.
That's correct.
I just want to say one of the reasons I love Ron DeSantis and Governor DeSantis is he went out of his way to support Doug Mastriano with turning point action over the summer while a lot of establishment Republican groups told DeSantis not to do it.
He said, I don't answer to you.
That's a big, that's a big win for DeSantis.
I want to tell you, that took a lot of courage for him to do that.
And obviously, he's up 15 points in the latest Florida poll.
It didn't hurt him, actually helped him.
Okay.
We can't get rid of this woman.
No matter how hard we try, she always comes back.
And I do not want to discount or let's just say it's not a possibility of Hillary Clinton potentially running for president in 2024.
She's talking about how Republicans are going to steal the election?
You can't say that.
You're an election denier.
Play cut 31.
Hello, Indivisibles.
I'm here to highlight something that is keeping me up at night.
Right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election.
The right-wing-controlled Supreme Court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures.
Yes, you heard me that correctly.
State legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections.
Hilde Beast, she just won't go away.
I'll tell you.
She is relentless.
I think she could potentially run for president in 2024, which I would love.
I'll donate to that campaign.
We should get as many Republicans as possible to donate for the Hillary Clinton for president campaign.
Let's just show her the support, get her across the finish line, get her to be able to be the nominee.
Is Hillary laying groundwork now for a post-red wave narrative?
What's she talking about?
She talk about state legislatures having plenary power, which is constitutional, not conspiratorial.
And I love the language she uses: steal the election.
Really?
Elections can be stolen, Hillary?
You election denier?
You're a threat to democracy.
We hear nonstop.
Hillary Runs Again00:02:26
You can't question anything.
The election's perfectly there.
Then Hillary Clinton comes out and says the election is going to be stolen by right-wing extremists, and it's keeping me up at night.
Geez.
I don't think we've seen the last of Hillary Clinton.
I've said that for quite some time.
Hillary Clinton has still not accepted the 2016 election results, by the way.
And what is she talking about?
A number of Republican nominees for Secretary of State and State Legislature in Arizona, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada could manage the proceedings of the 2024 election if they win, have in the past challenged the legitimacy of the 2020 election.
Oh, wait, so we can't challenge the 2020 election, but Hillary Clinton can challenge an election that hasn't happened yet.
So Hillary can challenge a theoretical and future election before anyone votes, before there's a candidate, before there's a nominee, before there's primaries.
She can already say it's going to be stolen.
And we can't say, yeah, it's probably a weird thing that $400 million via Zuckerboxes came into our cities.
We had mail-in ballots that were like a five times increase.
We had signature verification problems.
No, no, no.
You're an election denier.
You're an insurrectionist.
But Hillary Clinton can already say that a future election is stolen.
How does that one work exactly?
I don't think we've seen the last of Hillary.
I don't.
She's got to do everything she possibly can to get out of the house with Bill.
So she's got to just.
I think Bill's actually going to be the big winner of this.
He'd love to see Hillary Clinton back on the rope.
Email us.
It's the unhappiest politically married couple you'll ever see.
They don't actually love each other.
It's been quite honest, obvious for years.
Email is freedom at charliekirk.com.
It's a marriage of political convenience.
It's well known.
Subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast.
We're getting a lot of emails here about Doug Mastriano.
I'm sure they hate Mastriano and they fear him.
Yeah, it's the antithesis of everything they are.
That's right.
It's just they are now running ads boosting the Democrat to go against Mastriano.
It really is repulsive.
It shouldn't be acceptable.
We should never forget it.
Same thing they're doing in Alaska, same thing they're doing in New Hampshire in the primary.
If you tabulate all the money together, it's tens of millions of dollars that have been going by Republicans against MAGA candidates.
That should infuriate you.
Never give money to the Republican establishment again and let them have it when they call you.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email me your thoughts as always.
Freedom at CharlieKirk.com.
Thank you so much for listening.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk. com.