Midterm Ballot Measures, Props, and Referendums No One Is Talking About
If you don’t understand ranked choice voting, you’re not alone. Charlie spends this episode explaining to listeners the scam that’s being pulled on voters, not just in Alaska, but nationwide, as the midterms are dotted with statewide level propositions instituting this anti-democratic voting scheme designed to destroy MAGA candidates. Charlie does his best to explain the system, and how we can get rid of it for future elections. Then he goes through a list of the most critical propositions that are on the ballot in key states that no one is talking about.Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Silence on Race in Midterms00:05:00
Hey, everybody.
Today on the Charlie Kirk show, ranked choice voting strikes again.
We go through the ballot referendums and the sleeper cell issues that you need to know going into the midterms.
If you want to support our program directly, go to charliekirk.com/slash support.
I want to thank our amazing team at Turning Point USA that is just doing the Lord's work right now.
Support us if you can at tpusa.com.
Get involved.
If you have a student, if you have a young person in your life, encourage them to start a high school or college chapter at tpusa.com.
That is tpusa.com.
Check it out: tpusa.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandTodd.com.
I want to thank our new publicist, The New York Times, The Rise of a Conservative Radio Juggernaut.
Thank you.
An entire article about Salem media, about the impact that we have here on this program, radio stations across the country, and of course, our wonderful partners at Real America's Voice.
But this is more about kind of our radio reach, and it goes on and on and on about how Salem media has a massive influence.
Nicole Hemmer, a political historian at Vanderbilt University, the Center of Medical Mutilation of Children, and author of The Messengers of the Right, Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics, said Salem's effect was far-reaching.
They're using their many different properties for coordinated message misinformation, which is undermining democracy.
I just love it.
They can't, it is, it's an incantation at this point.
Do you notice how they don't call us racists as much anymore?
Because that doesn't work.
The hyper-racialization of American politics actually isn't resonating as much.
And something that I do want to comment on about this midterm cycle, and I said this early, and I don't think this has received nearly the platform that I think it deserves is: have you noticed how we're not talking about race this midterm election?
Have you noticed that we're not talking about BLM or systemic racism?
It is a losing issue for the Democrats.
Now, they replaced it with fascists, but this is actually a little bit, dare I say, a chance for us to celebrate just a little bit of a victory, just a little bit.
We pushed back hard on Juneteenth.
We pushed back hard on Floyd Apalooza.
We pushed back hard on Chaz, the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone.
We've pushed back hard on critical race theory.
And yeah, there's some pockets of radicals and postmodern insurgents across the country, but generally, Democrats now realize it is a political liability, not a political benefit, to run on the hyperracialization of America.
And we did that because we did not give an inch.
Now, other Republicans did, like Mike Braun, who I think has atoned for his mistake when he said, well, BLM is a wonderful organization.
Boom, Tucker went after him.
Or that woman that used to run the think tank in DC, where she said, well, we need to have some sort of racial reconciliation.
Boom, we went after her.
One after the other, after the other.
We went after Braun as well.
And guess what?
Now the Democrats have lost one of their most potent tools.
Now they have to call us a bunch of semi-fascists and attackers of democracy.
And that just doesn't resonate as much.
You see, a suburban house mom, her great fear is one day being called a racist.
It doesn't really bother her to be called a threat to democracy.
That sounds so nerdy and wonky.
A threat to democracy?
Like, yeah, okay, great.
Now, I mean, in PhD circles and in graduate classes, I guess that's a zinger insult.
You're a threat to democracy.
But being called a racist, I mean, that appeals to almost everyone.
No one wants to be called a racist.
And they don't do it anymore because they realize it doesn't stick like it used to.
Anyway, that's a sidebar as I read this New York Times article.
So you guys can read this, how the rise of a conservative radio juggernaut at the New York Times.
I read the New York Times, so you don't have to.
And they're complimenting the reach of this program about how it says here, Salem Media Group reaches more people than they realize.
This is my favorite line of the whole thing.
Their hosts are big names and they have huge reach, which makes them one of the most powerful forces in conservative media that hardly anyone knows about.
Well, thank you for finally noticing.
How Ranked Choice Voting Works00:03:18
So, okay, let's get into some news here that I think is really important.
I want to go to this cut where it shows in very clear terms our midterm situation.
Go to cut two.
Look at worsening views of the economy, Nate.
Look at this.
Two-thirds of people say it is getting worse.
So I ask people, okay, well, let's turn to politics here.
Who do you blame for this?
What's the reason?
Well, look, there's more folks now who say that Democratic policies have harmed the economy than helped it.
It's not the only reason they see for this, but they're reasoning out of results, right?
There, if they want to pinch parties in power, okay, must be doing something wrong.
And then by contrast, they think, well, Republican policies more likely would help.
Republican policies more likely can help.
Now, but what are the other threats to our liberty, to our republic, that are bubbling up across the country that are not getting coverage?
For example, ranked choice voting.
Ranked choice voting is one of the most dangerous, subterranean, and serious risks to our country that almost nobody talks about.
Ranked choice voting is going to determine whether or not the snake, Lisa Murkowski, or the patriot, Kelly Shabaka, become the next senator in Alaska.
Ranked choice voting is a project of academics designed to destroy the conservative movement, the America First movement, the populist nationalist movement, and instead yield to technocrats in red states and radicals in blue states.
Ranked choice voting is really pushed by this organization called Fair Vote, of which one of their board members is head of programming at George Soros' Open Society Foundation.
Just to give you an idea of kind of the family of funding that is behind this idea of ranked choice voting, and it is spreading all across the country.
Ranked choice voting is not where you go into a voting booth and vote for candidate X or Y, but you rank them in order of preference.
Sounds nice, sounds fun, it's actually awful.
It's terrible.
It's anti-American.
And if we were to use the technical definition of democracy, which I hate the word democracy because no one actually knows what it means, it's anti-democracy.
This is a very simple explanation.
I think this video is very helpful of what ranked choice voting is.
Play cut 33.
Ranked choice voting is another voting method which allows voters to rank their candidates in order of preference.
In a ranked choice voting election, a candidate needs to earn more than half of the votes to win.
All first choices are counted.
And if a candidate has a majority, then they win, just like any other election.
If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated.
And voters who pick that candidate as number one will have their votes count for their next choice.
This process continues until a candidate earns a majority and is declared the winner.
Yeah, so for the 50% of the vote.
You can win with a plurality.
And so it keeps on going to the second and third round, of which people that might say, well, I like Kelly Schabaka, but you know, I don't want a Democrat, so then I'll rank Kelly, you know, Lisa Murkowski.
And Murkowski will not be the first choice of a lot of Democrats, but she will be the second choice for a lot of Democrats.
And eventually, through these different rounds of voting, you get the moderate, even though that moderate is not the first choice plurality, of which that's actually a way a flourishing and functioning election would work because there's so many candidates.
Brain Fuel and Newtopia Promo00:02:57
So they flood the zone with all sorts of different candidates.
They confuse voters of this methodology, and it's going to give a hand up.
It's going to give an incumbent advantage, if you will, to people like Lisa Murkowski against Kelly Schabaka.
Well, ranked choice voting is on the march.
It is well funded.
The left knows that they could destroy our movement via rank choice voting.
And it's already in place in Maine and Alaska.
And this cycle for all of our patriots in Nevada, we have to pull the alarm and warn you that there is something called question three, which is going to be on the Nevada ballot.
And this is a chance to stop ranked choice voting in its tracks.
Look, I want to tell you my latest discovery.
It's amazing.
I guarantee this is the hottest super nutrient-packed new product to boost your brain and overall well-being on the market.
First, a little bit about my experience with this.
As soon as I tried this product, I became a super fan of it because I was blown away with the immediate results that I felt.
I felt focused.
My mind was clear.
It doubled my mental performance.
It became my go-to routine for a productivity boost, immune support, and even some people would say, glowing and healthy skin.
I think that's a nice compliment.
You've probably heard about the superpowers of mushroom extracts and collagen.
So guess what?
The product I want to share with you today contains the most hyper-concentrated forms of the four best health-boosting mushrooms: lion's mane, chaga, cordyceps, rishi, collagen, and Peruvian cacao.
This product was developed after long years of research by the most advanced brain chemist and formulator today.
The magic is called Kala Genius.
It is genius.
It's delicious.
It's effective.
When you combine the cultivating powers of these four mushrooms mentioned above, the various benefits of collagen, it's truly amazing what happens to your brain and body.
So if you struggle with brain fog, have difficulty focusing, want to repair your brain, check it out at newtopia.com/slash kirkgenius.
That is N-O-O-T-O-P-I-A dot com slash Kirk Genius.
And look, add it to your coffee and simply mix or simply mix it with water.
This smooth, chocolatey drink will definitely find a way into your routine.
And the most important, it will fuel your brain and body with all day energy without any jitters or crashes.
Newtopia.com/slash KirkGenius and use promo code Kirk10 to save 10% off to save 10%.
And Newtopia, the company that makes Collagenius, is so confident you're going to love this product.
They offer you a 365-day money-back guarantee.
The special link is newtopia.com/slash KirkGenius.
That is N-O-O-T-O-P-I-A.com slash Kirk Genius and use promo code Kirk10 during checkout.
Check it out right now.
The Three-Card Monty of Elections00:14:43
Ranked choice voting is a huge threat.
And it is currently being used in Alaska as a uniparty ploy to defeat Kelly Shabaka.
We got to get Kelly Shabaka over 50% in the first round of voting, which is a side note.
And this is just one of the most important things I got to say, which is if you have a state that has ranked choice voting, just pick your top candidate and that is it.
Ryan emailed us and reminded me, please educate your audience.
They need to just pick their top choice and leave the others blank.
That's right.
You are not forced to fill out the rest.
And so Annie says this: Charlie, can you please explain ranked choice voting?
It's very hard to understand.
I have tried to understand it, but till now have been unable to wrap my head around it.
I'm sure there's others like me.
Perfectly understandable, Annie.
It took me a while to understand it too.
So let me do the best job I possibly can.
And we'll play that video again, but that was a little short.
You get a ballot.
You have all the candidates listed, and it kind of goes in columns.
Okay, so hear me out here: columns from left to right.
And the columns go through round one, round two, round three, and round four.
And depending on how the ballot is configured, you rank your candidate as to be your preference, one, two, three, or four.
So you say, this is my first candidate.
This is my second candidate.
This is my third candidate.
This is my fourth candidate.
And so then through the rounds, it goes through: okay, so candidate A was your first choice.
Candidate B was your second choice.
Candidate C was your third choice.
And candidate D was your fourth choice.
And so when they tabulate it, they'll say, okay, let's do our first round of counting.
And let's say that Kelly Shabaka in Alaska, there's a picture of ranked choice voting.
Let's say Kelly Shabaka in Alaska gets 48% of the vote.
Pretty impressive, right?
48% against three other candidates.
Not enough.
So then Kelly Shabaka will go to the second round of voting.
And then they will tabulate if anybody, then they, I'm sorry, this is where it gets complicated.
If I understand correctly, then they eliminate the last place person.
Well, then it goes to the second round of voting.
And then they tabulate them again.
To see now with the last person eliminated and all the people that had the last person ranked first, they retabulate them again.
And then if no one gets to 50 plus percent, let's say Kelly Shabaka gets back to 49%.
Well, then they go to the third choice of voting, eliminating whoever got last again.
And it goes through this process until somebody gets 50 plus percent of the vote.
Now, if you're confused, that's the point.
I did the best I could.
I apologize if that didn't make any sense.
Essentially, there are rounds of voting giving a preference on the rank.
Now, this is going to sound a little bit more clandestine than it actually is, but it is effectively an algorithm.
Now, I'm not saying that to freak you out.
The media is going to have a field day when I say that, but it is a matrix of which how the votes are counted, right?
Because if it was ranked choice voting and you win with a plurality, not a majority, then there's really no need for it.
But they say, well, this is the most democratic way to do it.
No, it's not because you're running up against four other candidates.
So by definition, the person that might have a ton of enthusiasm at 47, 48, 49% can't win.
In fact, if I remember correctly, Donald Trump only won a plurality, not a majority in some of the states in 2016 and 2020.
It's very hard to get a majority of voters.
And they say, well, that's just what you have to do.
What they're asking for is uniparty type candidates that can get a little bit of Republicans, eliminate a little bit of Democrats, and then protect and preserve regime-style politics.
That's what they want.
And so in Alaska, this is a way, and we have them on camera saying this, that this is a way to protect Lisa Murkowski.
Now, this is coming to Nevada.
If any of our patriots are out there in Nevada, you have to get the word out.
Vote no on question three, which would change the state's general elections to a ranked choice voting system.
Vote no on question three.
It wouldn't pass into law yet, has to pass again in 2024, but this is an easier way to stop it right now.
It is a backwards, intentionally complicated matrix, an algorithm to try and preserve the uniparty and stifle your voice.
Look, the world is in total chaos and it's going to cause massive food shortages like we've never seen.
Are you prepared?
Do you have a stockpile of emergency food if the unthinkable happens?
If not, now is the time to get some emergency food for you and your family.
Go to preparewithkirk.com and you'll save $250 off a three-month emergency food kit from MyPatriot Supply, the nation's largest preparedness company.
Each three-month kit is packed with delicious food, breakfast, lunch, dinner, drinks, and snacks.
To avoid fights, get one kit for each person in your family.
Right now, MyPatriot Supply has no limit on how many kits you can acquire, and you'll get free shipping on your entire order.
This is the lowest price in three years.
So stock up now and save really big money.
Make sure you have this food when the time comes, which could be soon.
Go to preparewithkirk.com.
That is preparewithkirk.com.
Check it out right now.
Preparewithkirk.com.
We're getting so many emails, freedom at charliekirk.com.
And honestly, you know what the consensus is?
Confusion.
People are living in Alaska emailing us right now saying, I don't even know how to do this.
And I'll give you one example.
Great patriot here, Kathy, from president of the Matsu Republican Women's Club.
God bless you.
She makes a great point.
She says, please correct your message.
You're correct with Kelly Shabaka-Murkowski race that people shouldn't rank Murkowski.
However, in the race for our lone U.S. House seat, if people only choose one Republican, Begich or Palin, then the Democrat will surely win.
In that race, voters need to rank Republicans one and two.
Begich and Palin or Palin and Begich and nothing else.
Thank you.
Great point, Kathy.
Thank you for clarifying that.
So in certain circumstances, you don't rank.
In other circumstances, you do rank because then it could benefit the Democrat.
Are you confused yet?
That's the point.
We just got a note in our chat.
Yet another reason it's insane.
Yeah.
Kathy didn't mean to make any issues for the Alaskan grassroots up there.
Thank you for correcting me.
Here, James says, Charlie, I'm a Nevada voter, and I'm very concerned.
Even if the voters only selects one candidate and leaves the other blank, does that open the process to fraud by allowing another party to complete the rest of the vote?
Maybe.
I don't know.
Any idea how to fully cancel out the remaining non-select individuals out voting the vote submission?
I have no idea.
I'm sorry.
That's a great question.
James, he says, loves the show and the positive vibes.
Thank you.
We try to stay positive.
Our best days are ahead.
So you go to fairvote.com, which is the major organization that is pushing this.
By the way, what's so amazing about fairvote.com, I'm sorry, fairvote.org.
I stand corrected, is they really don't have that sizable of a budget.
They're getting this done with limited resources.
This has been the best ROI of the Democrats in quite some time to be able to destabilize the MAGA movement.
Now, it's so nonsensical.
Here's just one example, and this is going to be a little confusing, but you can, theoretically, make a candidate lose by raking them higher.
You can actually sabotage a campaign.
For the first time in American politics, you can actually make a specific candidate lose, even though your specific candidate might not win.
For example, if supporters of candidate B change their first place votes to A, which in the process makes B fall to third place, so that candidate is eliminated, his second choice vote then goes to C, causing C to win, which would cause A to win in the first example.
This entire thing is a problem trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.
All of this is a response to 2016.
All of this is a response to Donald Trump winning in 16.
They see what is happening.
A diverse, parents-centered, patriotic, forward-thinking, positive movement in all 50 states.
And they have to stop it, and ranked choice voting is a way to stop it.
They say it's a way to de-radicalize our politics.
That is insane.
That is nonsensical.
It's not true.
Deradicalize our politics.
Okay, this is a weird but simple example.
Play cut 44.
Under ranked choice voting rules, it's not enough just to get the most votes.
You need a majority.
More than 50% of the votes.
Purple's ahead, but it has only seven votes.
It needs at least 11 to win.
So we eliminate the color in last place.
Sorry, Orange fans.
We're going to your second choice.
Two more for green.
One for purple.
But no color has 11 votes yet.
Still no majority.
Bye-bye, blue.
One more for purple.
Four for green.
And we have a winner.
The ranked choice voting way.
If you wanted to destabilize faith in elections, do that.
If you wanted to sow distrust in our democracy, that's a great way to do it.
I understand it, and it is still confusing to me.
And by the way, it also begs the question of who's doing the counting, who's doing the tabulating.
It's not, we had enough problems in 2020 with signature verifications and ballot trafficking and mules.
Now we want to overly complicate it to say, well, yeah, bye-bye, blue, and bye-orange, and we're doing this.
So now we have an algorithm.
We have a multi-process tabulation.
It introduces potential counting and tallying issues, some that could be innocent mistakes or some that could be malevolent, some that could be benign or some that could be actually in some way sinister to try to boost a candidate.
That video is just one of many that explains ranked choice voting, but you go to the website, it's spreading all across the country.
In Kansas, for example, they use ranked choice voting in the 2020 Democrat presidential primary.
They use ranked choice voting in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina for military and overseas voters.
In Virginia, they used ranked choice voting in their Republican nominating convention.
Indiana, they used it in their Republican nominating convention.
This is exactly how the Soros groups operate.
They introduce it and they let it spread like a contagion under massive propaganda.
And if you are a moderate, if you're a Mitt Romney type, if you're a Murkowski type, this is a gift from above.
You don't have to win over voters.
You don't have to win over your Republican voters anymore.
You can just win over a little bit of Republicans and be like, well, a Democrat's going to win.
You might as well rank me second.
Now, Shabaka is telling people to only rank her first because people get confused and might rank her multiple times, nullifying their votes.
So this is how insane this gets.
So this is the ballot.
So if in every, let's pretend candidate A is Kelly Shabaka.
If you ranked her first through every single one, then it nullifies your entire vote.
So if you rank Kelly one, two, three all the way across the board, it cancels your entire ballot.
How is that Democratic exactly?
You know, for the folks that were always like, every ballot should count.
It doesn't matter if the signature doesn't match.
Every ballot should count.
It doesn't matter if he's dead.
Hold on a second.
So now if you don't know how to fill out these ballots, and we're getting email after email of our wonderful Alaskan patriots, I love Alaska, great people, saying, Charlie, I've been trying to call the Alaska Board of Elections and people can't ask.
They don't even know how it works.
You call some intern at the Alaska Board of Elections.
Say, yeah, I think this is what you do.
Oh, you think this really, in some ways, is the danger, is the pernicious nature of allowing academics to run our elections.
But let's just even put that all aside.
It is a massive takeover threat to stop our movement.
Okay, email us your thoughts about that.
Freedom at charliekirk.com.
So, again, I'm getting so many questions here.
People in Alaska, they're asking me questions.
Could putting a zero in those unwanted spots, will that make you destroy your ballot?
Probably.
I don't know.
How many people have more than a choice for anything?
It makes no sense.
Yes, exactly.
And these are patriots from Alaska all across the country.
It is spreading.
It's on the ballot in Nevada.
It is New Mexico.
They use it for local elections in Santa Fe and Las Cruces.
They use it in local elections in Colorado.
It's in the most cities per capita by far in Utah.
It's in Minnesota.
It's in Illinois.
It's in Michigan.
It's in New York.
It's in parts of Vermont.
It is in Connecticut.
You guys can check it out, fairvote.org.
They use it in Maine.
It's like a three-card monty of elections.
But that's not it.
There's other things on the ballot that this midterm I want to make you aware of for our great patriots across the country.
There's over 130 ballot measures and referendums on the ballot this year.
I want to focus on a couple of them.
Kentucky, Amendment 2.
It would clarify if there is no right to abortion in the state constitution.
It doesn't ban abortion.
Then, right then and there, it would just explicitly give the legislature the power to ban it if they want, very similar to what happened in Kansas and failed.
In Montana, referendum 131 would explicitly state that all babies born alive are people and must be given medical care.
Why do we need to put that on a ballot?
Well, it's because laws that shouldn't have to exist, but because they do, they have to because of left-wingers and liberals.
Michigan Prop 3 and California Prop 1 and Vermont Prop 5 would make abortion a state constitutional right.
Probably can't stop the last two, but Michigan might be competitive.
So Vermont and California will make abortion a constitutional right.
Missouri Amendment 3, SD measure 27, and ND measure, these are all marijuana legalization measures.
Arkansas marijuana initiative, they would all try to fully legalize marijuana.
Colorado Proposition 122.
Email Boston University Now00:07:53
Can we just get some stats, please, on Colorado, on the crime, on the vagrancy?
Colorado is not in a great spot.
Producer Andrew is very bearish on Colorado.
He doesn't like Colorado very much.
I love Colorado.
I think it's beautiful.
I think it's gorgeous.
I think some of the people that have moved there are degenerates.
I think it's an absolutely spectacular place.
Andrew thinks it's totally lost.
I think there's life left in Colorado.
I really do.
I think there's so many great patriots that could rise up and retake the state of Colorado.
I know I might be just foolishly optimistic in that way.
I'm very optimistic about Colorado if the work gets done and people rise up.
So Coloradans have seen a 35% jump in violent crime.
I'm doing this for a reason.
A 35% jump in violent crime and historic rise in property crimes.
Okay, you go to downtown Denver, it's not what it used to be.
It is an open-air drug pit.
It's dangerous.
It's awful.
And that's not to say that all of Colorado has become that way, but downtown Denver is unrecognizable.
Okay, so you got rising crime all over Denver.
You got all sorts of issues.
So what is the priority of the Colorado kind of drug lobby with all the rising crime?
Proposition 122 would legalize psychedelic plants and fungi and let people raise them at home for personal use.
That's the priority of Colorado.
And I hate to say this, and I don't want to be cynical.
I bet it passes.
I really do.
I bet the psychedelic, the psychedelic referendum is going to pass.
If you want to see kind of America growing apart, these two referendums, I think, are very telling.
On one hand, you have Oregon, Measure 114, which would ban ammunition magazines with no more than 10 rounds.
I don't think that's constitutional.
This won't stop any murders, but obviously it'll put a lot of ordinary gun orders into being prospective felons.
I don't think how popular that will be in Eastern Oregon.
You ever been there?
It's like very, very conservative.
By the way, I fully support Eastern Oregon seceding from Oregon and becoming part of Idaho or becoming its own state.
Eastern Oregon is a categorically different state than Western Oregon.
Eugene, Salem, Portland.
That's a totally different operation than the Patriots from the Sun River Valley bend on.
One of my favorite places in the world is Bend Eastward.
But then you have Iowa on the other side that should show where America is right now, which will create a specific individual constitutional right to own and carry a firearm and even stronger than the Second Amendment.
So in Oregon, they want to put ammunition restrictions on.
And in Iowa, they want to say there should be no restrictions at all.
Really kind of goes to show where the country's at.
Email me your thoughts, freedom at charliekirk.com.
A lot of emails about ranked choice voting and kind of what to do with it.
I'm going to do my best to go through it.
And yes, I do think ranked choice voting is unconstitutional.
I think there have been some lawsuits, but a judge has not really heard them, I think, correctly yet.
All right, I got a very simple question, and no one has been able to answer it.
Which there is this story that came out here.
And I'll be very honest.
I didn't read all the news reports on it.
So if you guys could tell me the why in this story, it would be very helpful.
But you all probably saw the what.
Boston University develops new COVID strain with 80% lethality, raising ethical questions about the research.
Research at Boston University have developed a new strain of COVID-19 that has an 80% kill rate on mice infected with it.
The mutant variant, which was developed as a hybrid of Omicron about the original, and the original strain from Wuhan, was exposed to rodents in a laboratory at Boston University.
Researchers also infected human cells with the deadly variant, finding it five times more infectious than Omicron.
So I kept on reading what the Daily Mail said.
Why are they doing?
What is the goal here exactly?
Why are we creating gain of function research and creating new viruses?
What is the best case scenario out of this?
Can anyone, can they do a press conference and take questions and say, what is the best case scenario exactly of this?
And now, I don't want to hear the filibustering from the media.
Oh, these are doctors.
We must trust them.
Oh, really?
You want to know about the medical profession, where the medical profession is going?
Listen to the insanity.
Listen to the idiocy that is infecting the medical profession.
This is the new Hippocratic oath they have, for example, at the University of Minnesota Medical School.
We touched on this a little bit last week.
They're pledging allegiance to the Hippocratic oath to fight colonialism and the gender binary.
And these are the people that could potentially be playing with an 80% lethal virus.
Why is Boston University doing gain of function research here domestically?
Can anyone answer that very simple question?
What if it leaks?
And by the way, as we learned in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, all it takes is for one leak.
What is the assurance we have that some numbskull won't put something in a wrong tube and then it will just kind of go out and like, oh, sorry, now there's an 80% lethality virus that could be spread.
Sorry.
What the heck is going on here?
Why are we putting up with this?
Who is funding it?
Boston University, if there is one call of action for action for our entire audience, everybody here should email Boston University and their medical school immediately and say, you guys are sick people.
Stop it.
Close it down.
Shut it down.
Make that virus go away.
We don't trust you.
We don't trust your scientists.
We don't trust any of it.
Can anyone please tell me what the best case scenario is at creating a mutant virus that could kill 80% of the American people in the world?
This is your medical community, PlayCut 45.
We commit to collaborating with social, political, and additional systems to advance health equity.
We commit to uprooting the legacy and perpetuation of structural violence deeply embedded within the healthcare system.
We recognize inequities built by past and present traumas rooted in white supremacy, colonialism, the gender binary, ableism, and all forms of oppression.
We commit to promoting a culture of anti-racism.
A culture of anti-racism.
These social justice warrior fools are going to be playing around with deadly pathogen viruses.
Do you trust them?
Someone's got to answer at Boston University.
Where's Pocahontas?
Where's that other old crow, Markey or whatever his name is?
Or where's Charlie Baker, the alleged Republican that's the governor of Massachusetts?
Can anyone tell me what's going on at Boston University?
Don says, Charlie, Bill Gates said they're waiting for a stronger virus to come out.
Event 201 lays out their plans.
Don from California.
You know what, Don?
A couple years ago, I would have scoffed at that.
Now I'm like, I don't know.
Can somebody tell me what their plan is at Boston University?
Who's funding this?
Who's overseeing it?
What is our assurance that this thing's not going to leak?
Because some numbskull who's pledging allegiance to anti-racism and defeating the gender binary might by mistake, like, oh, sorry, infected myself.
Now the whole world dies.
Why is this happening on American soil?
Shut it down immediately.
We're not a serious country.
We're not.
Our borders are wide open.
We have 87,000 new IRS agents, and we can't get an answer from Boston University as to why they're creating a superkiller virus.
Why is this even legal?
Whoever is doing this should be investigated and shut down and potentially held criminally accountable.
You don't just create bioweapons and get away with it.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email me your thoughts.
As always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk. com.