All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 5, 2022 - The Charlie Kirk Show
35:57
The CDC Caught Lying about the Vax "Death Signal" with Steve Kirsch and John Amanchukwu
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Critical Theory and Foucault 00:10:49
Hey, everybody.
Today in the Charlie Kirk Show, John Amanchuku joins us about postmodernism and critical theory.
I open up with a little bit of a preview into what critical theory is.
We don't talk as much about that, more about abortion.
But then we have Steve Kirsch with some latest vaccine data and why is it that liberals are worshiping the vaccine?
Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
And make sure you leave a five-star review if you can and review our podcast.
As always, freedom at charliekirk.com is how to contact me.
Support the Charlie Kirk Show at CharlieKirk.com/slash support.
Get involved with Turning PointUSA today at tpusa.com, sort of high school chapter or a college chapter today at tpusa.com.
You can email me your thoughts directly, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Buckle up, everybody.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
For personalized loan services, you can count on.
Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandodd.com.
There's this disturbing theme.
We've been hitting it, and I don't even have an exhaustive list here of Democrats that are refusing to debate their Republican counterparts.
Kerry Lake with Katie Hobbs, Shapiro with Mastriano, Fetterman with Oz.
He won't debate until a later date.
Zeldin with Hochul.
The new model of quote-unquote democracy is so oligarchic.
And Madison warned about this in the Federalist papers because every time democracy is actually mentioned in the Federalist, it's actually mentioned negatively.
The word democracy does not show up in the Declaration of Independence, doesn't show up in the Constitution.
It does a couple mentions in the Federalist papers, but only negatively, not positively.
And this kind of new model of democracy, if you will, or this kind of new blueprint, is answer zero adversarial questions.
Do a bunch of fundraisers from a bunch of very wealthy, woke, white, miserable people with more money than anything, but very little joy and happiness.
A lot of them live in Silicon Valley, live in Seattle, they live in Portland, they live in D.C., they live in Boston, they live in New York.
Very wealthy, high-paying tech jobs, unfulfilled lives.
And then these candidates just kind of hide at home and they don't debate.
It's deeply disturbing.
It is unsustainable.
If you have an entire American political party that basically says we don't do debates anymore, oof.
I don't care what your position is.
That is an oligarchy.
In a moment, here we will have Pastor John Amanchuku, who has a great new book called Erased, all about critical race theory and abortion.
I've spent a lot of time kind of thinking about this particular issue of critical race theory, kind of the structures that the left is trying to destroy here.
And on John Amanchuku's website, it says by defunding Planned Parenthood and similar groups, we could save 900 black babies a day.
It's incredible.
You guys can check that out at johnamanchuku.com.
And when you talk about critical race theory, it's important that we understand the philosophers and the venomous and the insidious ideas behind CRT.
You see, CRT and critical race theory is just an outgrowth of critical theory itself, which of course was pioneered by Herbert Marcuse from the Frankfurt School, a committed communist revolutionary who came to America with the sole intent to try and change the framework, change the approach of how human beings in the West viewed their existence.
Herbert Marcuse wrote a book called One Dimensional Man.
One Dimensional Man was widely accepted in the American Academy as being profound and clairvoyant.
And it really kind of started this school of thinking called postmodernism.
And in postmodernism, they believe in something called frame theory, which is that there's an infinite interpretation of events that you're living through, an infinite interpretation of truths, if you will, that there is not one truth, that there is your truth.
And so as you have the kind of many interpretations of quote-unquote what is true, well, then all of a sudden you get into power dynamics.
Postmodernism believes more about power than they do truth.
They believe in the collision of the oppressor versus the oppressed.
They do not believe in objective beauty or goodness or virtue or truth.
Critical race theory, critical theory believes that power dynamics, especially power dynamics via the tribe, is the only way that we will be able to mitigate conflicts or differences.
Now, critical theory manifests itself in a variety of different ways in our country.
It manifests itself in black-only dormitories, in hiring quotas, in affirmative action, in blatant forms of racism that exist against, unfortunately, white people and Asian people in our country.
But even more than that, critical theory exists to change the terms and the language of the very basis of our society, of humanity as we know it.
If all of a sudden the words of the Constitution can mean whatever they want to mean, well, then the Constitution can mean whatever you want them to mean.
And so the kind of assault on language, of course, it's very corollary to the trans movement, I can be whomever I want to be, is an outgrowth, is a sister, is a cousin of the postmodern movement.
And we see that in so many different ways now in our government.
We see that in our culture, in our society.
And so, for example, when you study Jacques Derrida, who's another one of these guys that was part of the postmodern movement, you start to realize the darkness and the hopelessness that is embedded in deconstructionist philosophy.
And, you know, look, for example, Jacques Derrida, one of the quotes that Derrida had about this, he always said this, one thing.
One of the most famous quotes of Jacques Derrida, he said, I believe in the value of the book, which keeps something irreplaceable, and the necessity of fighting to secure its respect.
No one gets angry at a mathematician or a physicist whom he or she doesn't understand, or it's someone who speaks a foreign language, but rather it's someone who tampers with your own language.
You look at the very basis of postmodern or deconstructionist philosophy.
It's making you question the terms, the language, and the truth of your very own existence.
That's one of the most fundamental things that keeps us all together, that binds our entire civilization together.
Jacques Derrida, alongside another one of those tricksters, Michelle Foucault.
Michelle Foucault was a very sick person from France, another kind of one of the kind of flat, the banner carriers, if you will.
In fact, when I was at UC Berkeley and I did the kind of ask me anything back and forth on campus, it was a woman came up with the book One Dimensional Man, I think it was either One Dimensional Man or Foucault, and asked me to sign it.
And I wrote there, I said, There is, you're smarter than this, don't believe this garbage.
Michelle Foucault said, I don't believe that it is necessary to know exactly what I am.
The main interest in life and work is to become something else that you were not in the beginning.
Ooh, that is dark.
Think about this.
I don't believe it is necessary to know exactly what I am, not to discover who you are as a human species, what is a human being.
The main interest in life and the work is to become someone else that you were not in a beginning, to transform.
But you think about the kind of philosophical disturbance of Michelle Foucault, what he's writing about here.
The main interest in life and work is to become someone else that you were not in the beginning, to transform oneselves.
That is fundamental to the trans movement.
The German historicist model, the progressive, the Darwinian belief is that it's not how you were made by your creator, it's what you are becoming.
We've talked about here on this program the difference between being and becoming.
Becoming can be okay.
You could become a man, you could become a Christian, but becoming the wrong thing, it's very, very dangerous.
Friedrich Nietzsche talked openly about this, about becoming an Übermensch, becoming a superman, elevating and lifting yourself up to a higher plane of existence.
Nietzsche wrote, and he did not mean this, he was not proclaiming it.
He was not celebrating it, that God is dead, and therefore we must build our own values, must build ourselves up to become das Übermensch.
It all ties together.
Foucault said, the main interest in life is to work to become someone else that you were not in the beginning.
Just so you know, this is the pile of pablum and garbage that your child is being taught on a university campus.
Look, Good Ranchers is an amazing company.
I eat meat almost every single night, and Good Ranchers crushes it.
The unbeatable quality of Good Ranchers is something that we really need to talk about.
Good Ranchers only sources the highest quality meat, the best, pasture-raised USDA prime or upper-choice beef.
It's better than organic chicken, but what does that mean?
That means no hormones, no antibiotics.
They have prime seafood as well, caught fresh on boats and then flash-frozen to lock in the quality.
Quality is in the product, but also in the process.
They age each steak 21 days, and you get every bite to peak tenderness.
It's so delicious.
It makes prep very easy.
No more trimming off 20% off every meat you buy.
The Good Ranchers Quality 00:07:12
Flash freezing and vacuum sealing locks in quality until you enjoy it.
And even the breed matters.
So I could tell you that Good Ranchers is going to make sure you get American meat that really is delicious.
Good Ranchers has never had to do a recall, and unlike the grocery store, they have a 100% satisfaction guarantee.
Go to goodranchers.com/slash Charlie.
That is goodranchers.com/slash Charlie.
Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.
Lots of grocery store meat is just dairy cattle, which is far from the best, almost as low quality as you can get.
So go to goodranchers.com/slash Charlie.
That is goodranchers.com/slash Charlie.
With us is John Amanchukwu, author of the new book Erased.
John, how are you doing?
Having me on your show, Charlie.
Yes, you bet.
John, tell us about your new book.
So during the summer of 2020, while city after city was being burned down after the death of George Floyd, while being at one of the busiest abortion clinics in the Southeast, a black father walked up to me while I was out there just trying to save babies.
Wearing a BLM shirt, he walked up to me and accosted me and he said, why are you out here fighting a white man's issue?
And on that Saturday morning, 70% of the people outside of the abortion clinic trying to save the babies were white.
But nearly 80 to 85% of the mothers prepared to abort their babies on that Saturday were black.
But this black father, while sending his girlfriend to the doorsteps of the abortion clinic to abort their baby, he's going to get mad at me because I'm fighting a white man's issue.
Now, if I were to ask him what the definition of critical race theory was, he would probably tell me that he didn't know.
But in critical race theory, they see racism at all times and in all places, even when a 6'4, 260-pound black man is at an abortion clinic trying to save babies.
From that, the Lord gave me a plan on how to fight this woke agenda and movement.
I want to make this plain.
I don't want to mitt cement's words.
Charlie, it's time for the gloves to come off.
It's time to fight.
Blacks have become the cheap prostitutes of the Democratic Party.
They screw us and barely pay us, and we keep coming back for more.
Since 1968, no Republican president has received more than 13% of the black vote.
And so for the past 50 years, we could do an assessment.
What has the black community gained from these liberal, progressive, woke, Marxist ideologies that are supposed to help us?
And the answer is nothing.
All we see is abortion on demand.
We see critical race theory pushed down the throats of students in the school system.
Whites are demonized for being white.
Blacks are made to feel that they're inferior because they are black.
We're making proverbial victims out of blacks.
Transgenderism is being pushed down the throats of our children in the public school system.
And things are getting worse and worse as the days go by.
It's time for black America to wake up and to uncover the lies of critical race theory and abortion.
And that is my intent through my new book.
I want to expose the truth behind the racism that critical race theory is and the racism of the abortion industry.
Amen.
And your message is starting to resonate.
Let's play Cut 62 and we'll go from there.
But in a game in which you're trying to drive up margins, the margin among African Americans for Democrats is clearly down.
But I think that this kind of gets at the core part of it.
Take a look at Joe Biden's approval rating among black adults.
If you go back to January to June of 2021, look how high it was.
It's 87%.
87% basically matching what he got in the 2020 election.
But look at that approval rating now in August and September of 2022.
It's all the way down to 64%.
It's going down, John.
Two minutes remaining.
So blacks are experiencing what I call Stockholm syndrome.
During a heist that took place in Sweden in 1973, the same year that Roe v. Wade was enacted in America, a man by the name of Jan Eric Olson walked into a Swedish bank.
Shots rang out in the air.
He robbed the bank.
He stayed in the bank with the hostages for nearly six days.
And somewhere along the way, the hostages started to fall in love with the person that was there to capture them.
And that's where black America is today.
We have falling in love with our captor.
And it's time for us to remove ourselves from the liberal plantation because as a community and as a people, we are going down because we are trusting in a God called government, and government can't be God.
Amen.
And the book is erased.
How can people find it?
I'm going to see you in Wisconsin in just a day and a half.
And we got to have you back on.
And tell us how people can find the book and your upcoming appearances.
Yes, you can go to erased, E-R-A-C-E-DBook.com.
You can follow me on Twitter and on Instagram at R-E-V-W-U-Truth at RevWoo Truth.
Purchase a book, purchase a box, send it to someone that you know that is woke.
Christmas is around the corner.
Thanksgiving is around the corner.
You know what happens during the holidays.
We argue about politics.
If you want to be armed with the truth, order a copy of Erased.
Yeah, the upper middle-class white suburban folks are very pro-abortion.
They're also anti-racism.
Oh, interesting.
Maybe you guys should educate yourselves.
John Amanchuku, I wish we had more time.
We'll make sure we do next time.
I will see you in a couple of days.
God bless you.
The book is erased.
Check it out.
Are you like every one of us that thinks our country has gone nuts, whether it's Russia Gate market crashes or selling oil to China or this insane inflation?
Well, right now, you need a financial mind who understands your concerns, but the same time as a Christian worldview of money.
That's why you should talk to my friends at PAX Financial Group.
Look, I've given my money to PAX Financial to manage.
If it's good enough for me, I think it's good for you.
Like all of us, they have concerns, but they also have hope.
In this market, you must have a financial person who shares your hope and at the same time can help you with biblical responsible investing, B-R-I, biblical, responsible investing.
That's why I want you to text the word Charlie to 74868.
That is Charlie to 74868 to connect with my friends at the PAX Financial Group.
Biblical responsible investing.
So take out your phone.
Just text Charlie to 74868.
That's 74868.
Text Charlie to connect with my great friends at the PAX Financial Group.
He's a courageous man.
Flawed CDC Safety Signals 00:15:01
He's been speaking out against the medical industrial complex and the pharma-controlled state that we live in.
It's Steve Kirsch, who has a very important article he wants to discuss with us.
And there's a couple of places I want to go with this.
But first, Steve, welcome back to the program.
Tell us about this article, proof that the CDC is deliberately ignoring the safety signals from the COVID vaccine.
Tell us about it.
Thanks, Charlie.
It's good to be back.
You know, there was an article, a bunch of articles that appeared in the Epoch Times about the CDC and their safety monitoring of the VERIS system, which is the vaccine adverse event reporting system, which is the official system used by the U.S. government for tracking adverse events in the vaccines.
And at first, the CDC says they were looking for safety events, and then they said they weren't, and then they said they were, and then they said they weren't.
And it just went back and forth.
It's almost so confusing to anyone, even myself, reading it.
And so I decided to do a little digging because back in August of 2021, I officially notified them via their official channels that they had a mistake in their safety monitoring signal generation algorithm.
And basically, they're looking at PRR, they're looking at chi-squared, they're looking at a raw number of events.
And it's an and clause, which means that if you're looking at something like PRR, which is a measure of proportional reporting rates, so it's a little bit technical, but it means that if you're, say, reporting 1% heart attacks in this vaccine, but other vaccines report 2% heart attacks,
then your vaccine must be safe because you're reporting proportionally less than the total number of events.
But the problem, of course, with this formula is that if you have a very, very dangerous vaccine and which is generating tons of events, then it's very difficult for that PRR number to be more than one and the CDC formula requires two.
But so they have a flawed formula.
They never corrected it.
They never responded to any of my issues back in August.
So they're applying a flawed formula.
But what I noticed when I read the Epoch Times article is that even with the flawed formula that they have, which will not detect any of the safety signals except for the most prominent safety signals, those will still be detected.
And so I decided to just do a calculation for the death safety signal since that's the most important.
And I couldn't figure out why they weren't generating a safety signal for death.
So I did the calculation.
And it turns out that the safety signal for death is so huge that it satisfies all three criteria that the CDC says for generating a safety signal.
So it should have generated a safety signal.
And the CDC should have notified us that the VARIS system has generated a safety signal for death.
There was no notification of anyone.
There was nothing in the Freedom of Information Act requests that came back showing that they even detected this critical safety signal.
I mean, if there's one safety signal you want to look for, it's death.
And there was nothing, not a zip zero in those Freedom of Information Act responses from the CDC showing that they even realized that the death signal was generated.
This is very troubling because it shows a complete lack of accountability and a complete lack of competency in terms of monitoring the VARS systems for safety signals.
Everybody in the world should be on edge knowing that the CDC is unable to even apply their own formula to their own data.
Well, it doesn't shock me.
This is the clip from the EPOC Times Want to Play Play Cut 63.
And last week, Dr. Walensky issued this letter right here, which was made public on September the 12th, in which she admitted that the CDC gave false information to us here at the EPOC Times in regards to their vaccine safety monitoring process.
Specifically, in this letter, Dr. Wilenski admitted that despite telling us otherwise, the CDC was not actually analyzing certain types of adverse events reported within their own database throughout all of 2021.
And instead, they only began their analyses of these adverse events in March of this year.
That is, again, despite the CDC telling us previously that they started their analyses all the way back in February of 2021.
So if we lie to the government, we go to jail.
They lie to us.
They get promoted and they make a bunch of money.
How are we supposed to process this?
Well, they're lying to us again in terms of, oh, yeah, yeah.
Well, we started it this year.
Well, no.
I mean, come on.
The most basic thing you look for is the death signal.
And it's as clear as day that it's been generated.
So, you know, I think the only way you battle this corruption is, you know, there's no congressional oversight of this, right?
They totally trust the CDC.
And so they're not going to do anything.
In fact, you call the typical member of Congress and they'll say, well, we don't trust you.
You're a misinformation spreader.
We trust the CDC and we trust the FDA and the NIH and surely the medical doctors.
If there was something wrong, they would point it out.
And so you're just spreading misinformation.
No, I'm actually spreading facts.
And these facts are all in plain sight, public view.
Anyone can look at this.
Anyone can do the calculation.
It is a simple calculation.
And it shows that the death safety signal has been triggered.
There is something seriously wrong here.
And there's something very wrong that the Congress, nobody in Congress, except for Senator Ron Johnson.
Yes, he's been amazing.
Yeah.
Is paying attention to this.
And nobody in the mainstream media.
So I'm curious.
You came on our program once and mentioned you were a big Democrat donor.
I don't want to politicize this, but do you find it curious that, I mean, Rand Paul's been pretty good, that why is it the Republican Party is interested in this and no one in the Democrat Party is?
I mean, I grew up in an America where one of the kind of villains of the Democrat base was pharma, was Pfizer, AstraZeneca, price gouging.
I mean, it's silence from Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.
It is, we must trust the science and all this, where I could see 20 years ago an Elizabeth Warren type kind of leading a workers' crusade against this.
I mean, what happened to the American Democrat Party?
Well, I think that it's the, you know, when you have a narrative that is promoted by the president of the United States, who's your own party, and you have, you know, I think that as liberals, we tend to trust the mainstream medical community.
We tend to trust the institutions, right?
So, you know, this is where I was more than a year ago as a big Democratic supporter and believer in these institutions.
You know, I think that liberals just, you know, for whatever reason, have much higher trust in these institutions of government than they should.
And so I think that is the cause of this, because it's not like payoffs to government officials, because my liberal friends, you know, who are not being paid off by the drug companies for sure, are all believers in the vaccine and we should get shot, get the latest booster.
I got, you know, I have one friend, one liberal friend who's got, you know, six boosters.
But conservatives, I think, are more 50-50 on the vaccine.
But liberals are like, you know, 95% versus 5%.
So I think it's more of the, you know, the character of the party.
I just find it interesting.
I know that if Republicans take back the House or the Senate, I could at least think of a couple senators that will definitely take this as an issue.
I know that.
I know Rand Paul will.
I know Ron Johnson will.
And then there's questions of new senators, right?
Will Senator Vance?
Who knows?
But there's definitely at least some openness, some question.
It's not like, nope, not interested at all.
And I just think it's a profile and courage with Senator Johnson in a very contentious reelection fight.
He still took this on and was willing to entertain this.
I think it was rather heroic.
I just find it so interesting.
And again, you're right, not every conservative Republican has been open-minded here, right?
I mean, President Trump has been a big pusher of the vaccine.
There's been a lot of Republicans, but there is an audience in the American right right now, at least around this topic, which I just think it's very interesting.
So let me ask you kind of another question here.
Actually, let's play some tape here of kind of a one-two combo.
It's a very depressing one-two combo, might I add?
Let's play Cut 57 of Pfizer celebrating children that are going to be in the vaccine child trials.
Play Cut 57.
All of us want to be superheroes.
And the most important heroes are those that help others.
This year, thousands of kids like us around the world joined the COVID-19 vaccine trial.
To all the kids who volunteer, we'd like to say thank you.
And then Cut 58.
This is a hospital advertisement: Cut 58.
One day I had a stomachache so bad, I didn't want to do anything.
The team at New York Presbyterian said it was actually my heart.
It was severely swollen.
Something called myocarditis.
But doctors gave me medicines and used machines to control my heartbeat.
They saved me.
These people are so evil.
Steve, what's your take?
Well, they're trying to normalize the damage from the vaccine.
They're trying to cover up the damage in the vaccine and make it appear like, oh, the myocarditis is just something normal.
And isn't it great that this hospital is treating it?
What they're not telling you in the ads is that we don't know what's going to happen five years down the road for that young girl who was in that TV commercial because myocarditis, I think the stats are like in five years, like 20% of the people are dead.
Or they're lifelong pharma patients too, Steve.
They make their great residuals, right?
Yeah, they do.
They do.
And you know what?
The fact that we're injecting six months old, kids at a very early age, is horrible.
And there was a paper from authors at Stanford, or sorry, at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, UCSF, Oxford University, and a few more institutions.
And they basically said that the risk benefit of this vaccine is so bad.
In other words, it's so risky that it is unethical for universities to mandate boosters.
And I looked at Harvard.
Harvard is mandating this, the COVID-19, the latest booster, the Omicron booster and the bivalent booster.
I mean, that is insane when you have a paper coming out from Harvard that says it's unethical.
So, Steve, I want to ask you: you know, do you think that people are generally waking up?
I mean, you know, you say that you have a lot of liberal friends and stuff that, you know, you have the nine boosters or whatever the number is.
I mean, how are they treating you?
Do they kind of treat you like a kook or are they open-minded?
I'm super interested in this.
Yeah, you know, it's starting to change.
I think that people are getting a little bit more open to questioning their beliefs.
I talked to some friends and they said, well, hey, if one of my, like one of my friends said, hey, I got six doctors.
And if one of them told me to lay off the booster and that they had concerns, that they would listen to that.
And so that's good.
It's not a majority.
It's if one doctor said, said something.
And one of my friends said, hey, if a TV doctor came out who was formerly promoting the vaccines and came out against the vaccines, then she would listen to that.
And of course, there is now a TV doctor in Great Britain who has now, who went from basically promoting the vaccines to everyone on TV.
And now he's saying, whoa, the vaccine should be stopped immediately.
And what's going on?
Well, there you go.
There's some evidence, right?
I mean.
There you go.
Yeah.
And of course, that's not my TV doctor.
That's someone else's TV doctor.
So, you know, they're still kind of in this cognitive dissonance bubble.
But you see, this is progress, right?
Because Dr. Asim Malhatra is the first TV doctor.
And he's not just a TV doctor.
He's a top cardiologist.
He's very well respected in the medical community and at the National Health Service in England.
And he basically, what happened to him is that his father died about six months after he got the vaccine because of blocked arteries.
And this is something that happens.
And the average timeframe is about five months from the time that you get the shot to the time that there's enough growth in your arteries to block off your arteries and kill you.
This is why the peak of death is at five months after you get vaccinated.
So his father died at six months.
And he started looking into it because he said, no, there's no way my dad died from heart issues.
Questioning Vaccine Evidence 00:02:53
He is like healthy as a horse.
He started looking into it and he looked at the evidence and he said, oh, this vaccine's a disaster.
And so instead of shutting up, which is what most doctors do, he decided to write a couple of papers that were then published in the peer-reviewed medical journal that he sits on the board of.
He wasn't involved in the review process.
But now it's in the medical literature that these vaccines are dangerous and should be stopped.
And so we're starting to see shifts in people who have these personal events.
When it happens to them personally, they realize and they wake up.
It all revolves around whether they're willing to look directly at the scientific evidence as opposed to trusting authority.
Because once they do that, it's all over.
It's game over.
Once you start to look directly at the scientific evidence, at the data itself, rather than trusting authority, there's no way that you can say that these vaccines are safe and effective.
Same thing happened to Paul Merrick, one of the top intensive care physicians in the entire world.
He's the most published and the most respected in his field, which is basically ICU medicine.
He basically thought the vaccines were safe too.
He took it.
And then he realized, and it took him months to look at the literature and to talk to people.
The same thing as with Dr. Malatra, the same thing happened to Dr. Paul Merrick.
A different field, but same result.
You look at the data directly, and then it's like, oh, this data is so convincing, and yet people aren't looking at it.
It's extraordinary.
Steve Kirsch, thank you for joining us.
I always say you could tell a lot by a moment in time of who to listen to, by who gains and who suffers.
There is no upside for you.
You've made a bunch of money in your life.
It's not a matter of making money.
You took the vaccine yourself, and now you've really created a successful fact-based crusade asking questions.
The people who have a lot to gain are the commentators on TV that get paid under the table by Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.
They're defending the indefensible.
And for parents out there that are giving this the six-months old or one-year-olds, my goodness, stop it.
You have to go check out Steve Kershash.
If you're 85 years old, I'm not one to tell you what to do.
You're one years old.
What are you doing?
Goodness gracious, why are we putting up with this?
Other countries have suspended childhood vaccinations with this mRNA gene-altering technology.
Steve, come back soon.
Thank you so much.
Yeah, thanks, Charlie.
Great job.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email me directly, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.
Export Selection