All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
June 2, 2021 - The Charlie Kirk Show
01:07:02
EXPOSED: Fauci's Email Dump Reveals the TRUTH About the China Virus feat. Donald Trump Jr. and Breitbart's Alex Marlow
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Breaking Fauci Email Leaks 00:02:47
Hey everybody, this episode is brought to you by my friends at ExpressVPN, expressvpn.com slash Charlie.
Secure your device, anonymize your online activity, protect your action online.
Expressvpn.com slash Charlie.
Help our show out by also helping yourself protect yourself.
Expressvpn.com slash Charlie.
Hey, everybody, breaking news of the Dr. Anthony Fauci email leaks.
You're going to have to listen to the episode all the way through because by the end of the episode, I discover something pretty telling.
And we're going to keep on exploring that exclusively here on the Charlie Kirk Show.
We also have Donald Trump Jr., who responds to the New York Attorney General criminal probe against the Trump organization.
And we also have Alex Marlow, editor-in-chief of Breaking the News.
What an episode only here on the Charlie Kirk Show.
If you want to support us, go to charliekirk.com slash support.
That is where you guys can get behind the work we are doing to reach millions of young people.
Maybe you want to be like Troy from Charlotte, North Carolina, who supported us at charliekirk.com slash support, or Joey, who is a generous monthly supporter, or Dexter from Reno, Nevada.
Thank you for your support.
CharlieKirk.com slash support.
Email us your thoughts, freedom at charliekirk.com.
And if you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, go to tpusa.com.
Fauci, Don Jr., leaking, Mr. Wolf, Alex Marlow, breaking the news.
Laureen Powell Jobs, only here on the Charlie Kirk Show.
Comprehensive, fast, fun.
Share with your friends.
Make sure you're subscribed.
Buckle up.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Breaking today is the Fauci emails.
Now, I'm going to take a different approach at first, and then we'll go into the more conventional take here.
It seems as if the Washington Post has decided to actually do a rare form of journalism.
They filled out a freedom of information request, a FOIA, a Freedom of Information Act.
In fact, we talked about this at length on our podcast yesterday, that filling out a Freedom of Information Act is one of the few ways to actually hold these tyrants, these despots, accountable.
Unchecked Authority and Deceit 00:14:24
So the Washington Post has now published thousands and thousands of private emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Some of them are rather boring and answering questions to celebrities and producers.
How he has time to do that, not exactly sure.
Thousands of emails just saying thanks.
But then there are some groundbreaking emails.
Now, before I get into these emails, I do not believe that this is all a coincidence.
I don't believe the Washington Post would do this without some sort of a wink, a nod, a gesture, a point from Ron Clain.
You see, I think that somebody wants Dr. Anthony Fauci removed.
I believe that, and this is reflected in the emails, we're going to get into it.
It's always the emails, isn't it?
So funny how that works.
I believe that the evidence is now overwhelming that the Chinese coronavirus was manufactured in a laboratory.
I believe Dr. Anthony Fauci was more involved than people realize.
I believe that he was intimately into the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Because of that, and because of now the sudden interest in finding out where this virus came from and how the evidence is showing this did not come from a bat.
This did not come from the Himalayan mountains.
This did not come from a wet market.
This came from a biolab that Dr. Fauci very well might have visited himself, but we do know that the National Institute of Health funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology through gain of function research.
Somebody wants Dr. Fauci gone for some reason.
None of this is a mistake.
So now these groundbreaking emails are quite something.
The first email, I just think that every single parent should take this email from Dr. Fauci and read it at a school board meeting.
February 5th, 2020.
Dr. Anthony Fauci wrote in response to Sylvia, masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected, rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection.
The typical masks you buy in the drugstore is not really effective in keeping out the virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.
It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keeping out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you.
I do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are going to a very low-risk location.
Your instincts are correct.
Money is best spent on medical countermeasures.
Here's the kicker, such as diagnostics and vaccines.
Safe travels, best regards, Tony.
Every single parent in the country should read this email if your child is being forced to wear a mask.
Every single person should read this at a city council meeting if you still have a mask mandate.
That the head of the National Institute of Health, has epidemiology changed in the last year?
Evidently so, because there's a political purpose for masks.
It dehumanizes a population.
It makes us less familiar with each other.
It makes us easier to control.
You see, the heavy push for masks is not about epidemiology.
It never has been.
Dr. Fauci admitted that.
No, this is a social control experiment.
This is about being able to make you submit to the Leviathan.
Other emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci that are just now out from Hugh from the National Institute of Health said, quote, Dr. Fauci, the paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause, but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH.
This is Saturday, Saturday, February 1st, 2020.
Not sure what this means since Emily is sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework.
She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.
What we're finding out here in these emails is as early as February 1st, 2020, NIH was trying to cover their tracks.
They were looking into like, hold on a second, was this before the gain of function research?
Was this before we started to do coronavirus?
Because Dr. Fauci then said a couple hours later, Hugh, it is essential we speak this morning.
Keep your cell phone on.
I have a conference call at 7.45 a.m. with Azar.
It'll likely be over at 8.45 a.m.
Read this paper as well as the email that I will forward to you now.
You will have tasks today that must be done.
Ooh, that's like a, who writes that way?
That's really, right?
It's kind of a, feels like a mob hitman, doesn't it?
You have tasks today that must be done.
Like, it's just kind of sends a chill up your spine.
I don't know about that.
And then he has the most extensive email signature I have ever seen in the history of email signatures.
It's like 15 lines.
Other emails from the Dr. Anthony Fauci show that as early as January 31st, 2020, it shows that Christian, who works for Dr. Anthony Fauci, says that the coronavirus shows that the genome was inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.
They knew this was made in a lab early.
Our own government was never upfront with you.
And now we must, hold on a second.
So let's just take a quick pause and tie it right back to today.
If all these emails show that they were lying about masks and they were lying about the origins, what are they saying about the vaccine right now?
Are we supposed to trust these people?
They had their own suspicions, in fact, their own cover-ups that they were likely executing that shows that they thought that this virus was made and manufactured in a laboratory.
In fact, the subject line of the email from Dr. Anthony Fauci was mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins.
Dr. Anthony Fauci also just has one of the funniest emails that I've seen just screaming about Governor Ron DeSantis, just raging about him.
He says, quote, I have been screaming on television two to five times per night to tell the younger generation to start taking this seriously.
I'm very surprised Governor DeSantis has not completely closed the bars.
Dr. Fauci and Ron DeSantis had a little battle and Ron DeSantis won.
But the email that is the most important is it shows a researcher who funded the Wuhan laboratory admits to manipulating the Chinese coronavirus and thanked Fauci for dismissing the lab leak theory.
This is from zerohedge.com.
The email states, quote, from my perspective, your comments are brave and coming from your trusted voice will help dispel the myths being spun about the virus's origins.
Meanwhile, another email shows that they suspected and knew this was manufactured in a laboratory.
Why is it that Dr. Fauci was receiving orders to try to distract people from focusing on the Chinese Communist Party when it came to the Chinese coronavirus?
And as we go through these Dr. Anthony Fauci emails, which are bombshell emails, it begs the question, who does Anthony Fauci work for?
Where in this beautiful document that I'm holding up right now in the United States Constitution, was it ever anticipated that someone like Dr. Anthony Fauci would have as much power as he has?
No, you see, Dr. Anthony Fauci is part of the fourth branch of government, not Article 1, not Article 2 or Article 3.
The legislative, judicial, and executive.
No.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is part of the fourth branch of government, and that is not in the U.S. Constitution.
He's part of the federal bureaucracy that's unelected, unknown, and has unchecked power.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, in some ways, his existence within the governmental body is at odds with our constitutional republic.
Look, for many of you that watch our live stream or our radio show, listen to our radio show, you know I talk about Relief Factor a lot.
And look, truth is, I know millions of people are in some kind of pain, maybe from exercise or just getting older, that can do it.
That's why I'm so impressed with Pete and Seth Talbot.
They are on a mission.
You've rarely seen this kind of focus and commitment.
Seriously, they recently shared with me that they are doubling down and want to literally double their number of total happy customers in the next year.
And I believe they'll do it.
So here's the deal.
If you're struggling with back, neck, shoulder, hip, or knee pain, or even general muscle aches and pain, then I'm suggesting you order their three-week quick start, still discounted only $19.95, about a dollar a day to see if we can get you out of pain.
So go to relieffactor.com.
That's relieffactor.com.
The Talbots are amazing people.
Check it out, relieffactor.com.
The breaking bombshell emails of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Did anyone ever vote for Dr. Fauci?
Did anyone ever canvas for Dr. Fauci?
Did anyone ever collect signatures for Dr. Fauci?
These emails show us that Dr. Fauci, we know he's a liar.
We've known that for the entire time that he has been in the public eye.
We know that he had a very shady history.
You see, here's one way to describe Dr. Fauci.
Dr. Fauci is clever.
And clever people are the most dangerous.
Now, Dr. Fauci is the head of a government bureaucracy, a lifelong struggle to try to get to run not just a bureaucracy, but a medical bureaucracy.
What kind of person gets to the top of the hill like that?
Someone who's willing to do things that are not always ethical.
This is a lifelong struggle where Dr. Fauci has failed upwards.
Now, success is not the way that people like Dr. Fauci are promoted.
No, it's the willingness to do what is necessary for the monolith.
Now, if you are clever without ethics, those type of people are the ones you must watch out for.
In this email right here, Christian or Christian said on Friday, January 31st at 10:30 at night, Christian is kind of raising the flag.
She is signaling the alarm saying, Tony, I don't think this is naturally evolved.
We have to look at this much more closely, but this is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.
Why did they make this public when all of a sudden Donald Trump was saying this came from China and likely a laboratory?
Why did they lie?
You see, Dr. Fauci also said in this email right here, not the one where he's raging against Ron DeSantis.
That's a fun one.
He said that he knew very early on, before the WHO even declared a pandemic, that researchers suspected the virus had, quote, been potentially engineered.
So now, this is why I love the internet.
I'm not a big fan of the internet for a lot of things.
This is why I love the internet.
Somebody smart out there, can you go find some testimony of Dr. Fauci in front of Congress saying the opposite?
Can anyone find Dr. Fauci in his dozens of hours of testifying to Congress if he did not know or had any evidence that this was engineered?
Because the emails show the opposite.
Therefore, maybe Dr. Fauci might have to have the future of Michael Cohen lying in front of Congress.
Now, when leftists and collectivists lie in front of Congress, they tend to get promoted to run the CIA, like John Brennan.
When John Brett knows Clapper, well, whatever, they're indistinguishable.
When Clapper said that, no, we're not doing mass surveillance of American citizens, total lie under oath.
Now, as we look at these emails and they keep on coming out, thanks to the journalism of the Washington Post, let's just stop ourselves a little bit short here.
This is not journalism being done by the Washington Post.
The Washington Post is executing the wishes of the machine.
The machine says we are exhausted of the raspy-talking virologist running NIH, and he might have been clever enough to climb the hill of the medical bureaucracy.
But do not be surprised if Dr. Fauci announces his retirement sometime this summer.
If Dr. Fauci gets a nice coronation of exit, but they want him gone.
Now, how the Biden administration is going to cover up the origins and how our own government, the head of the fourth branch of the medical bureaucracy, knew where this was coming from, knew that it was engineered, and that the Chinese Communist Party has yet to be held accountable.
That remains to be seen.
No one voted for Dr. Fauci, and yet Dr. Fauci had almost unchecked authority to lie to you, to mislead the public.
And Dr. Fauci had two qualities that I believe are some of the most dangerous for a human being in power to have.
Dr. Fauci has arrogance and deceit.
He was willing to lie and be confident while doing it.
Liberal Privilege in Power 00:13:00
These emails keep coming through, and we are going through thousands of these emails for you.
CNN has already showed that they show a resilient fighter of a man.
That goes to show that there's something there.
Dr. Fauci currently has more power than any other person that has been elected.
What's going to happen to him?
Are you saving for retirement or just treading water?
Are you depending solely on stocks or mutuals instead of diversifying what you really need?
Do you know that it's easy to move out an old 401k into precious metals like gold?
And that's predicted to go up more than 2,500 an ounce soon.
This could be the answer for you.
So call the team at Noble Gold.
Do it this month, and they'll gift you a free 22-carat, one-tenth of an ounce gold American Eagle Coin.
Just mention the promo code Kirk.
Visit noblegoldinvestments.com.
That's noblegoldinvestments.com.
With us is a friend of mine, a great American patriot, and someone, everyone's got to go get this book, Liberal Privilege.
You guys can get it at donjunior.com, D-O-N-J-R.com.
Don, how you doing?
I'm doing well, buddy.
How are you?
Doing great.
It's been too long.
So I saw you on Tucker last night, and I wanted to have you on today.
There's a lot happening, but I just first want to talk about what's happening in New York with Letitia James and what I consider to be a political persecution, unlike anything, I think, in American political history.
How are you guys dealing with this?
And do you guys see this as, you obviously said this last night, but as a continuation of almost this five-year political witch hunt?
100%.
I mean, it's pretty clear when the attorney general of a state without any information literally campaigns on saying, hey, we're going to investigate.
We're going to lock them up.
We're going to do this, that, and the other.
You know, it's pretty amazing that they can get away with it.
And then they do it.
And then they do it for five years.
And the reality is this: there's no recourse.
There's no one keeping them in check, Charlie.
They can just do this.
You have no where to appeal it.
So you're going to appeal it to a leftist judge in New York who feels the same way.
They're utilizing their taxpayer-funded offices in a political vendetta to try to damage my father.
And the reality is this, even after five years, you know, in search of a crime, right?
They've been looking for five years.
They're getting closer, Charlie.
We've been hearing this now literally for half a decade, and yet there's still nothing there, and yet no one's stopping them.
So as crime rates go through the roof in New York, as murder rates go through the roof, as businesses are going out of business because of New York's disastrous recovery spots, they're spending taxpayer dollars on a political witch hunt against Donald Trump rather than, I don't know, murderers.
This is what's going on in America.
They're outraged when this stuff happens in, I guess, what, Belarus recently, right?
It's an affront to democracy, except for when we do it in America against our political enemies.
Then it's totally fine.
But that's what we're dealing with and we've been dealing with for a while.
We're going to keep fighting because that's what they do.
But think about it this way.
If they can do this to a billionaire, an ex former president of the United States, who can't they do it to?
Who won't they do it to?
And more importantly, how's the average person going to be able to push back?
I mean, we'll spend millions of dollars a month on legal fees and nonsense.
So even if nothing happens, they sort of get that win.
And that's what they're doing.
They just try to damage and hurt their political targets and their political enemies as much as possible.
And they've been doing it for five years.
And I just want to reinforce this point, which is if you are able to use political power to destroy the people you disagree with, the people that might threaten, you know, threaten your, not just your worldview, but your likelihood to be in control, it is a very, very dangerous precedent to set.
So in New York, grand larceny is up 66% year over year.
Felony assault is up 35.6%.
Robbery up 28.6%.
Rapes are up.
Murders are up nearly 20%.
Now, what is the chief law enforcement officer doing for the state of New York, Letitia James?
She is using millions of dollars of resources and hundreds of personnel to try and go after a former president who, by the way, is not even a resident of the state any longer.
And it's not like they're investigating, you know, El Chapo style behavior.
No, this is paperwork type issues where there were thousands of transactions.
You employed tens of thousands of people all across the world, and they're trying to have some sort of paperwork issue of inflated assets.
You show me the man, I'll show you the crime.
And so, Dom, talk even more about to the base here and our listeners about the implications more broadly and what we must do about this.
And I'm pleased to hear you talk about this.
We've been doing segments about it because we have to call this out for what it is.
This is a great abuse of power in a Soviet show trial fashion.
This is the destruction of a fair and independent judiciary.
And this is using ultimate power to try to destroy political opponents.
100%, Charlie.
And it's not like this is the only example.
I mean, listen, if you've been watching for the last five years, look at the FBI.
Look at what they were doing.
You know, nothing happens.
They can lie before Congress.
They can go and do a witch hunt.
They can all know that it's BS.
They can all get on TV and act as political pundits and talk about things in a way that they know to not be correct.
You saw that, right?
They testified before Congress.
No, there was nothing there.
But on TV every night, they pretended as though Russia, Russia, Russia was a real thing.
This is what's going on.
The left and the radicals have infiltrated the highest forms of government.
They've gotten control positions in the highest forms of law enforcement.
And I do have to make the distinction between law enforcement at the bureaucrat lawyer level at the top versus the door kickers, because I know a lot of the door kickers.
I hang out with the doorkickers.
They're disgusted at what's going on in these agencies.
But this is what the left does.
They've done it in education.
They've done it in pop culture.
I mean, just look around.
They've infiltrated those things, and they want to make sure they're going to drive their worldview down your throat.
And if you resist, you're a racist.
If you resist, Charlie, you're a homophobic.
Now, you may not be any of those things.
You may not have anything to do with it, but that's their game.
And they will cancel you and they will finish you.
They'll make sure you never work again.
And so people who believe what we believe, in many cases, are forced into silence.
You know, sort of defeats the purpose of America and freedom of speech.
When you may have it, but if you do it, the ramifications are so severe.
Even for expressing an opinion that is shared by, let's call it 50% of the country, that you're not actually willing to express it for fear of reprisal.
And that's what all of this is.
It's reprisal against political enemies driving their narrative.
And it's a really scary track.
Like I said, if this was going on in a third world country, we'd be really upset about it.
We'd be cutting off aid for it.
Instead, we're sending aid to terrorist organizations like Hamas and talking about cutting off Israeli defense funds for the Iron Dome so they can protect against incoming missiles into their neighborhoods.
I mean, this is today's Democrat Party.
This is how far they've fallen.
And honestly, if you took some of the Democrat Party heroes of the past, they'd be rolling over in their graves looking at today's Democrat Party.
I totally agree.
Rapes are up 52.8%.
And the chief law enforcement officer for the state of New York is worried about a paperwork issue, allegedly, after years of trying to find something far more salacious.
And so, you know, it's really interesting, Don.
You and I had to be lectured by the sociopaths for the last couple years about a peaceful transition of power.
How many times did we have to hear that?
He's not going to leave office.
How is this a peaceful transition of power?
How are you actually allowing one party to go to the other if all of a sudden when that person no longer has power, you say, you know what?
Now that I have power, I'm going to extinguish and I'm going to make sure we have a public example.
And so, Don, a question I get a lot and people are emailing us, freedom at charliekirk.com right now is, how is your family holding up in the midst of this?
How is your father holding up?
I mean, after delivering results for our country, doing everything he said he was going to do, people kind of take me aside.
They say, hey, how are they hanging in there?
Any insight you can give us, Don, into that?
Yeah, listen, we're doing well.
Maybe because we're a bit masochistic, we sort of like to be in the fight.
And more importantly, because the fight is worth it.
I mean, you brought up opening this thing, my book, Liberal Privilege.
It's literally about all of these things.
Whether it's this sort of faulty persecutions, whether it's the ongoing aspects of this.
I mean, look at what's going on even, you know, take January 6th, okay?
And say what you want about it.
Like, if you commit a crime, you should commit a crime.
But the FBI and the highest level of law enforcement, anyone who is, you know, if you are within about 2,000 miles of Washington, D.C. and you're a conservative, it's like the FBI is putting a, have you seen this man?
He was seen somewhere within 1,500 miles of D.C. that day.
Let's find him.
But 13, 14 months of looting, of arson, burning our cities down, taking over buildings.
Charlie, I've been told that that's insurrection.
I've been told that's insurrection.
And yet, there doesn't seem to be any interest in looking into that insurrection.
It's total pass.
And this is how disgusting it's been.
And that's my point.
I guess we have to stay in the fight.
We have to be engaged.
You and I both understand how much of a disadvantage you are in if you're a conservative.
You understand?
You get no help from the mainstream media.
You get no help from print media.
You get no help from social media.
Frankly, they're working actively against us to censor us, to cut down our platforms.
How many times have you and I been fact-checked for an opinion?
How many times have you and I been fact-checked with some sort of technical nuance that, you know, well, if you look at it this way, just so they can cut our platforms off from under us?
You know, I literally, I wrote this book last year, Liberal Privilege, knowing exactly what was coming.
And literally, not only did I call all the things that are now coming to fruition and coming to light, whether it's the stuff as it relates to China and the Wuhan laboratories.
I mean, the most plausible and likely scenario seems to be what actually happened now.
And yet, at the time, if you did that, you were peddling conspiracy theories.
You were fact-checked.
You were thrown off platforms.
You were discredited.
You were tarred and feathered in a public square.
The most plausible argument.
No one said it was fact.
You just said, hey, this could really be a possibility.
No way it can't.
You mean you're telling me that the virus originated about two steps in front of the Wuhan laboratory that's testing these sort of things.
And we're supposed to believe that people got it from a bat.
I mean, maybe they did, but you're going to say that it's not possible that it happened at the laboratory that is doing experimentation with these kinds of viruses.
I mean, who's that stupid, Charlie?
Apparently, the left thinks we all are.
And yet, people like you and I, who combated that, who fought against that kind of nonsense, again, were publicly ridiculed and tarred and feathered.
Now, there's no takeback.
You know, there's no, oh, I apologize.
We got this really wrong.
Just like there was never anything about Donald Trump, just like there was never an apology for Russia.
That's why we have to stay in this fight.
We have to be engaged and we have to make sure that everyone else does it.
If we all band together, they can't cancel us.
But if there's only a couple people out there taking all of the hits, taking all of the blows, it's going to be a lot harder to get where we need to be.
I totally agree.
And we need public displays of support.
We need to call out their injustice as they do it.
And again, what's happening in the state of New York, and we're seeing it in a lot of different manifestations, regardless of your political affiliation, is an abuse of power.
You were given power to try to have justice that is blind, and saying, I'm going to go after somebody before I even know what they did because I don't like them because they won an election that I wish they wouldn't have is one of the ultimate injustices imaginable.
Don, thank you for coming on.
Liberal Privilege is the book.
You guys can get it at donjunior.com, D-O-N-J-R.com.
And Don, I just want to say on behalf of all of our listeners, our viewers, and our activists, we have your back.
And even if they keep on throwing stuff at you, we just want to commend you for continuing to fight for our country.
So thanks so much for coming on, Don.
Don Jr. Defends Natural Origin 00:15:19
I appreciate that, Charlie.
Thanks very much.
And for those of you for your Father's Day gifts, I'm actually doing personalized versions of Liberal Privilege.
If you check it out on the website, we can do something cool for your dad, who may be a MA fan or in the fight.
But either way, I think you'll like the book.
So check it out.
Thanks, man.
And great talking to you as always.
You bet.
Thanks, Don.
Talk to you soon.
Look, big tech and the left are partners.
They have an alliance.
We all know that.
So why are we choosing to give all of these big tech companies our personal data?
Now is the time to take a stand.
Protect your personal data from big tech with the VPN that I trust for my online protection, ExpressVPN.
You see, every device, whether you're on a phone, laptop, or TV, has a unique string of numbers called an IP address.
When you search for stuff, watch videos, or even click on a link, big tech companies can use that IP to track all of your activity and tie it back to you.
When I use ExpressVPN, my connection gets rerouted through their secure encrypted servers.
So these companies can never see my IP address at all.
My internet activity becomes anonymized, and my network data is encrypted.
And the best part is you don't need to be tech savvy at all to use ExpressVPN.
Just download the app on your phone or computer, tap one button, and you're protected.
Protect your internet activity with the VPN I use every day to get three extra months free on a one-year package.
That's expressvpn.com.
Visit expressvpn.com/slash charlie.
That's express.com slash Charlie to get three extra months free, expressvpn.com/slash Charlie.
We have a whole team going through all the Dr. Anthony Fauci emails.
Get this one right here.
This one was written by Donald McNeil, who is the chief health editor of the New York Times.
He is insulting Americans and praising Chinese.
I'll throw out this email to Dr. Fauci.
And he says, but the truth is a lot of average Chinese behave incredibly heroically in the face of the virus.
Meanwhile, in America, people tend to act like selfish pigs interested in only saving themselves.
And Dr. Fauci says, you make some very good points, Donald.
Donald, by the way, this is February 25th.
Now, here's a good question.
Just an interesting question that just struck me.
Why is it when Republicans controlled the Senate last year, they were not issuing subpoenas for these emails?
You see, the way our system of government is built is that the National Institute of Health and the chief medical bureaucrat, the clever, treacherous, arrogant, and deceitful man, Dr. Fauci, had to be held accountable at some point.
Why is it that an independent news agency has to be the one that gets these emails and Congress doesn't?
If Congress has any form of oversight, it should be to say, hey, what was the National Institute of Health saying on February 25th, right before the lockdowns?
Now, do we have some sound here of Rand Paul asking Fauci some questions?
Now, let's play this right here.
Dr. Fauci and Rand Paul going back and forth.
Let's play that sound.
Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute.
Do they fund Dr. Barrick?
We do not fund Dr. Barrick's gain of function research.
Dr. Barrett does not doing gain of function research.
Well, the emails show that Dr. Fauci might have been lying under oath to Congress.
It's a big deal.
Michael Cohen went to jail for that.
Now, I don't anticipate Attorney General Merrick Garland indicting Dr. Fauci for lying in front of Congress anytime soon.
You see, Clapper did that, and he got to run a mass surveillance program, so did John Brennan, amongst many other people.
But that sort of technical process crime is only used against political opponents or if you have paperwork issues in the state of New York.
Of course, it says right here in one of the Fauci emails, I have way too many of these things.
Now, again, again, I will say this.
I believe the Washington Post did this to try and take him out because they were given a wink and a nod.
Oh, yes, here it is.
Email shows a researcher who funded Wuhan Laboratory admits of manipulating coronaviruses and thanks Fauci for dismissing lab leak theory.
Says right here, I will reiterate this.
I just wanted to say a personal thank you, Dr. Fauci, on behalf of our staff and collaborators for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin of the COVID-19 from a bat to human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
From my perspective, your comments are brave and coming from your only trusted voice will help dispel the myths being spun about the virus's origins.
Tony says, many thanks for your kind note.
However, it shows that Dr. Fauci's team was telling him that this likely came from a lab at the same time these emails were being sent.
So Dr. Fauci was presented with the compelling scientific evidence that this was made in a laboratory, that he was lying to the public.
And what does this mean?
Who's going to be held accountable?
You see, it goes back to this question of who is in charge.
That's a really good question.
Was it that all of a sudden they realized back in February and March they might have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shut down the country, bring in mass voting, and make billions of dollars on a vaccine?
Maybe.
Because they had information early that goes to show a lot of the chaos of the last year was avoidable and preventable.
Yet they did it anyway.
We're going to explore why.
Why was Dr. Anthony Fauci emailing Chinese scientists throughout the pandemic?
Dr. Fauci was emailing with this guy by the name of George Gao, who was the director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, where he was affectionately emailing back and forth where Gao, on a first-name basis, not Dr. Fauci, not dear head of NIH, said, Dear Tony, how personal?
I know you are working extremely hard with a lot of pressure.
Hope the U.S. situation is getting better eventually.
I saw the science interview.
How could I say such a big mistake about others?
That was the journalist's wordings.
Hope you understand.
It was not a real interview, but a QA through social media for several days.
Fauci wrote back, George, thanks for the note.
I understand completely.
No problem.
We will get to this together.
Best regards, Tony.
Now, Tony, or Dr. Fauci, is at a very relational level with the Chinese.
He is very, he's a personal relationship with the Chinese Communist Party.
He's responded in April 11th, George, thank you for the kind note.
All is well, despite some crazy people in the world.
Gao wrote, Dear Tony, I saw some news that you're being attacked by some people.
Hope you are well under such an irrational situation.
So you look through these emails, you realize that the persona that Dr. Fauci was putting forward was a complete facade.
He was playing theater.
This was Dr. Fauci from 2012 testifying in front of Congress.
Play tape.
For decades, NIH has supported basic influenza research, included on transmissibility, host adaptation, and virulence.
Kawayoka and Fouché constructed variants of H5N1 avian influenza in order to identify which genetic mutations might alter the transmissibility of the virus.
This slide shows the basic design of the experiments in which the virus was modified to allow for aerial transmission from one ferret to another.
This is called gain of function research.
This is Dr. Fauci back in 2012 saying that we are involved in altering the virus to potentially be able to understand it better.
Now, Dr. Fauci admits in CUT 26 that there was a modest amount of NIH funding going to the Wuhan laboratory.
But Dr. Fauci in front of Congress, lying under oath and also reinforced by the emails, said that he didn't.
There's a penalty for lying under oath.
Will Dr. Fauci be held accountable for that?
Play Cut 26.
So we had a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who are world experts on coronavirus.
And we did that through a sub-grant from a larger grant to EcoHealth.
The purpose of it was to study the animal-human interface to do surveillance and to determine if these bad viruses were even capable of transiting infection to humans.
So that's some sort of justification for admitting that Fauci was involved in gain of function research.
But you see, Hugh on Hugh Auchenklos, who works for him at NIH, sent an email, and this is always the most telling thing.
At 1:47 in the morning.
Let me say that again.
Why would someone send an email at 1.47 in the morning on a Saturday?
Probably because someone can't sleep.
That's why.
So Hugh Auchenklos sends an email at 1.47 in the morning on a Saturday to Dr. Fauci saying, the paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause.
Now, that's a super deceiving way to write it.
What he's really saying is, Tony, these experiments were happening while we were still doing gain of function.
That's what he's really saying.
And Dr. Fauci sent around this email and said, quote, not sure what this means.
Since Emily is sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework, she will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.
So Emily then, this is where you got to kind of put all these emails together, which is what our team is the best at.
Emily re-emerges here.
Let me get my Emily.
Ah.
Emily is on this email with Kristen.
But then Kristen follows up on that point and says that I should mention that after our discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.
This is January 31st.
So in the middle of the night, now that we have Fauci's emails, Hugh and Dr. Fauci are trying to backtrack.
They're trying to see their exposure.
They're starting to get a little bit nervous.
At 1.47 in the morning on a Saturday, Hugh Auchenkloss, who works for NIH and NIAID, sends Fauci an email saying basically, what's going on here?
And then a couple hours later, and by the way, do you want to know what the subject line of the email is?
In all caps, important.
That's right.
All caps important on Saturday 1st, March 2020.
Dr. Fauci says, who?
Hugh, it is essential that we speak this morning.
Keep your cell phone on.
I have a conference call at 7.45 a.m. with Azar.
It'll likely be over at 8.45 a.m.
Read this paper as well, the email that I will forward to you now.
You will have tasks today that must be done.
So now I'm starting to put together exactly what happened here.
I get it now.
Got it.
This is all breaking in real time.
Okay.
Now, Andrew, do you remember when we interviewed Mike Pence on that bus and I asked him about the Chinese coronavirus?
What was the date of that?
That was late January, early February, right?
So here in the Charlie Kirk show, we were actually on the campaign bus.
We interviewed Mike Pence.
And for whatever reason, I asked him about the Chinese coronavirus, just because I found it interesting.
And Mike Pence gave me a very diplomatic answer, which I always found to be a little bit weird.
But all of this was happening in the background.
And as this was unfolding, this weekend is the most important weekend.
If you want to find the smoking gun, this weekend right here with Dr. Fauci's, where all the activity was happening, you see, if we actually had a legislative body that was interested in oversight as the Constitution mandates it, this is the weekend to look into.
The weekend of February 1st.
Now, you might remember the week after that, if my memory serves me, that's when Alex Azar came out and said the Chinese coronavirus poses no significant threat to the American population.
It's very clear that the moment of time that should be of interest happened on the weekend of Friday, January 31st and February 1st, 2020.
So it's really interesting.
We went through an entire impeachment fight trying to map all the president's movements around a singular phone call he made to a Ukrainian president.
Has anyone decided to actually map the drama of what was happening the weekend when Dr. Fauci figured out that he probably was involved in the greatest epidemiological attack?
That's what these emails show.
And I'm going to get into that.
But first, I just want to say thank you for those of you that are supporting us at charliekirk.com/slash support.
We don't sleep a lot.
We pump out a lot of content.
And you guys can always email us freedom at charliekirk.com.
So I want to thank you guys for that.
So here's what happened.
Dr. Fauci sent an email to his team at 647 p.m. Friday, January 31st.
He was working late.
So I'm going to walk you through the drama that we now know.
And the temperature started to get raised a little bit.
Internal Team Confirms Lab Claims 00:04:02
Dr. Fauci sent an email to two people by the name of Jeremy and Kristen, or Christian or Kristen.
It's a very interesting way to spell Kristen.
Is that Kristen?
Probably.
So Kristen seems to be a very apolitical researcher.
She seems to know her stuff.
She seems to be a legitimate scientist.
So Tony, Dr. Fauci, sends an email with the subject line, science, colon, mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak's origins.
Dr. Fauci then forwards that email to Kristen.
Kristen, then working late on a Friday night at 10.32 p.m., says, hi, Tony.
Thanks for sharing.
Yes, I saw this earlier today, and both Eddie and myself are actually both quoted in it.
I'm guessing Eddie, we can find out who Eddie is.
These seem like just legitimate scientists.
It's a great article.
But the problem, and now it's about to get some mumbo jumbo you're not going to understand, is that our phylo genetic analysis aren't able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off.
On a phylogenetic tree, the virus looks totally normal.
And the close clustering with bats suggests that bats serve as the reservoir.
The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome.
So no one has to look really closely at the sequences to see that some of the features look engineered.
That's the bombshell.
Kristen is telling.
So Tony's not a scientist.
He's a bureaucrat.
Tony's asking his team late at night, what does this mean?
That's what's going on here.
He sends it out to Kristen.
I don't get this.
Tell me what this is.
And I don't get it.
What's going on?
And Kristen says, You don't have to look hard to find that the sequences are engineered.
And then she says, This, hold on.
It's okay, Tony.
We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this.
So we should know much more at the end of the weekend.
This was the most important weekend that basically changed humanity.
I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.
She reiterates her scientific theory to Fauci late at night.
But we have to look at this much more closely.
And there are still further analyses yet to be done.
So these opinions could still change best, Kristen.
Dr. Fauci then says, Dr. Fauci does not respond to that email till about 24 hours later.
So then the interesting thing happens.
Then Dr. Fauci gets her email that was sent at 10.30, internalizes it, and then writes a new email, this one.
Then, so Dr. Fauci gets an email from his scientist that says, you don't have to look very closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features look engineered.
We all find the genomes inconsistent with expectations.
His own team was saying that this was made in a lab.
So then he sends an email to Mr. Cleanup Man, Hugh Auchenklaus.
So then at 1229 at night, he sends Hugh Auchenklaus an email.
Subject line important.
So his team, just two hours before, says this was made in the laboratory.
And then he tells Hugh, you will have some tests today that must be done.
What tasks were those, Dr. Fauci?
Your team said it was made in a lab.
Then you sent out an email and I'll cap saying, important.
We got to clean something up.
Protecting Business Interests Over Truth 00:11:19
Here with Alex Marlow, just decided to stop in, and he's here all day, editor-in-chief of Breitbart.com.
And more importantly, the author of the soon-to-be best-selling book, Breaking the News.
Alex, welcome.
It is a bestseller, Charlie.
And I've got you to thank, among many others.
My colleagues in Talk Radio have been so unbelievable about this book.
And you were one of the first to really give me a shot at promoting on your show.
Thank you.
I almost guessed correctly.
Almost.
The new George Soros.
Almost.
You were so close.
You were floating all these names that were in the vicinity.
I know.
And then, and so many of the names you brought up are in the book.
Yes.
I at least got the idea that it was a woman.
Yes.
Yes.
You called that right.
You read me like a like I was playing a bad poker hand there.
Do you want to talk about the new George Soros?
Yeah, I'd love to.
Scary woman.
This is a lady named Lorene Powell Jobs.
Is it Lorene?
It could be Lauren.
I heard your hour on it, which was terrific.
And you really added to what I think about her as a character.
But I'm going to go with Lorene because it's fun.
And why do I have to pronounce her name right?
She doesn't deserve it.
Why did she get so much power in this country?
Yes.
Because she married a guy who was a genius and he passed away when he was young.
I'm not criticizing her for that, but if you think about the power that she has in this country, it is so immense, it's incalculable.
Can I walk you through it?
Yeah.
I know you've done it with the audience, but it's been at least a week since you have.
So, okay.
She bought The Atlantic through her thing called the Emerson Collective.
The Emerson Collective is her personal trust.
It's for philanthropy.
It's also for investing.
So that's a lot of stuff.
And that means that she doesn't have to show the IRS everything that she's doing because personal trust, some of us philanthropic, and they don't give those type of people a hard time.
If it's a political donation, everything's got to be above board.
You got to know exactly what's going on.
So she has the Atlantic.
She's got Axios.
She's the biggest shareholder of Axios, which is very important.
That's stunning to me.
Unbelievable, right?
Actually, there's a sort of neutral, right?
Trump calls him up.
Trump talks to him sometimes.
He does an interview with them.
Well, they're working for one of the biggest left-wing, one of the biggest left-wing puppet masters in the world at the moment.
But then she controls these things that are more overtly partisan, ProPublica, Mother Jones.
These are places that are in the activist left.
Then she's got now this.
You have to know now this turn.
I know all about now this.
Now this.
She did the whole thing on me.
I'm not surprised.
On Snapchat, right?
That a whole thing.
Who is Charlie Kirk?
He's, I'm guessing, a great guy.
Yeah.
Charming.
Great fashion sensibilities, good sense of humor.
Lots of charisma.
Yeah, that's it.
Yeah.
That's it popular.
No.
No, no.
Whatever the opposite of those words are, that's what they use.
Yeah.
And well, and you can look up how they treat Stacey Abrams and some of these left-wing people.
Okay.
But then she also owns this thing called Courier Newsroom, which is truly, truly repulsive.
Now, this is owned through this thing called Acronym, which she owns.
And Courier Newsroom is essentially a way of laundering Democrat propaganda, Democrat talking points into local news.
You might think you're reading local news, particularly on Facebook.
You're actually reading Democrat propaganda that was put forward by the Courier Newsroom.
Courier Newsroom is so bad.
Two other villains of the book, Bloomberg and a News Guard, which is one of the most absurd groups on the planet.
You read the book to read about these villains.
Even these villains in the book have written negative stuff about Courier Newsroom because it's so over the top.
It's so overtly partisan.
And all of these outlets go in the same direction against the same targets for the same heroes.
In the meantime, Lorene Powell Jobs stroking huge checks to Democrats.
700, I think, was the amount of donations over the last five or six years and all to Democrats.
The Atlantic, in the meantime, they are coming just barely short of endorsing Kamala Harris in the presidential race during the primary.
How many delegates did Kamala Harris get?
One delegate?
I think she dropped out before any votes were.
She ran for 10 months.
She got no delegates.
And Lorene Powell Jobs, her publications, singing her praises.
And all of this is done in this clandestine way, this mysterious way.
She was considered the world's least transparent mega giver by an organization that's honored George Soros, a group called Inside Philanthropy.
So not a right-wing group.
And this is the person who no one knows until this book.
And she got all her money, inherited wealth, which you talked about in your show, which is so important.
And she got all this money and she's on her yacht controlling the world.
No one knows who she is.
That has to stop.
And it has to be investigated, more importantly.
Yeah.
And so this is an interesting topic for conservatives to talk about.
It actually ties into this Fauci thing that we've been going through, which is who's in charge, who's actually calling the shots right now.
And the caricature of conservatives is that we're the ones that are being kind of puppeteered by these oligarchs.
And the opposite is actually the truth, where you have people on the left that have enormous amounts of power and wealth that they got very quickly or they just stumbled into.
And Lorene Powell Jobs is worth $19 billion.
And she plans to spend a lot of it, almost all of it, in remaking the world in an image that is completely different than the traditional American way of life.
And she doesn't want anyone to know about it.
That's right.
She's doing it intentionally with the least transparency possible.
Everything she does in terms of her disclosures, she doesn't have a big personality publicly.
And her public proclamations are just generic liberal claptrap.
It's just totally uninspiring.
And I think that's the design because she is this committed leftist and she is trying to use whichever tools are possible to advance this agenda.
And those tools include the glossy, prestigious press like The Atlantic.
It also includes the overtly activist press like ProPublica.
And then it includes the propaganda, dishonest, a pugilistic press like Courier Newsroom, just things that's just truly a weapon used on behalf of Democrats.
All of it's good with her.
Do you think she makes a penny from this stuff?
I don't know.
If she does, it's negligible.
It wouldn't fund her yacht for years.
Of course not.
It's about protecting those huge business interests and her political interests.
Well, and that's the thing that people have to realize.
And Bezos is a great example of this: is that the new hobby and the new toy of the ruling class is media institutions.
It's no longer Gulfstream jets or yachts.
The new toy that they want to use to play with is: I'm going to go buy the Washington Post.
Right.
Or I'm going to go buy the Atlantic.
And it serves multiple purposes because not only do you have power, but it also protects you.
Right.
The Washington Post is not going to do a robust investigation into Amazon anytime soon.
It's just not going to happen.
Right.
And so it also keeps you in that, in that position of authority over other people.
And so, Alex, the book you have, Breaking the News, it's doing very well.
Thank you.
You also talk about how we got here and what we can do about it in regards to how corrupt and how broken our media is.
Walk us through some of that.
Yeah.
And I want to continue with your point about how Amazon is not getting investigated by the Washington Post.
Now, one thing that is the most corrupt thing in the book that I noticed is these ties.
And this ties in perfectly to what you were talking about earlier with Fauci and his protecting of the Chinese, clearly going out of his way.
Yes.
Whether or not it's out of laziness or whether or not it's out of ideological sympathy.
We're going to go through it.
I just discovered in a moment.
Whatever it is, he clearly was not trying to give China a hard time.
Well, think about the way our newsrooms are structured now.
Our newsrooms, the biggest newsrooms on the planet, are really parts of gigantic international conglomerates.
Take NBC News.
Is NBC News just NBC News?
No, it's part of NBC Comcast Universal.
So you got Universal Pictures, which is opening the Fast and Furious movies.
They need to open in China.
Remember that John Cena?
What a pathetic pathetic guy.
But he's got business interests in China.
They just opened a universal theme park in Beijing.
So if you think that, oh, and the Friends episode that was sanitized in China, the new Friends reboot, it's sanitized in China.
They take out all this stuff and NBC just rolls over and says, please censor me.
Please let me have your communist cash.
I need your communist money.
Please censor my art.
So do you think NBC is going to investigate anything that's going on in China?
Of course not.
Do you think Universal is ever going to have a movie where China is the bad guy?
Well, that's really the problem, right?
Is that the blurring of business interests into a profession that is supposed to be courageous and investigative and going towards transparency?
That's really the issue here.
ABC, ABC Disney.
Do you think Stephanopoulos is going to do a hard-hitting segment on China when Disney is making it?
Let's go a step further.
Why would Stephanopoulos investigate their second largest shareholder, Lorraine Powell Jobs?
So most people she owns tons of Disney stock.
That's where a lot of her money comes from.
Because remember, Steve Jobs invented Pixar when he was on hiatus from a true genius.
It's the, you know, I don't know the man, obviously, but a legitimate entrepreneur.
Truly.
He took time off from Apple to start Pixar.
So Lorraine Powell Jobs isn't just making Apple money.
She's making Disney money.
This is exactly right.
You're so right on the money.
So why would Stephanopoulos start looking into anything connected to China, which is connected to Disney, which is connected to ABC?
And these are all the same people.
And not to mention, many of them are sleeping with each other.
Another thing I document in the book over and over again, which blows my mind, Tom Nye is about to get appointed ambassador to Israel.
His wife is the Virginia Mosley, senior vice president of news gathering at CNN.
Husband's in the Biden administration?
Kareem John Pierre, deputy press secretary.
Wife, Suzanne Malvo, anchor at CNN.
So it's not just George Stephanopoulos being a Clinton guy.
Jake Capper's wife, Planned Parenthood, a volunteer at some point in her time.
I can't, there's so many, Charlie, it's hard to list them all.
And we're expecting them to have any integrity on any of these vital interests, vital issues that are in America's essentials.
And so here's the issue is that without a billionaire subsidy, these news institutions would go broke.
But I think they can continue because they've become kind of an acceptable loss on the balance sheet of someone like Lorene Powell Jobs.
Like, you know what?
I'll lose 40 million a year, but the revolution continues.
I think part of the reason, and of course you've nailed it, there's part of the reason why the ride has been slow to the uptake on this is we think, how could ideological, how do, how could their ideology be that powerful that they would go with China and against America?
It's not just ideology.
That's because it is their bottom line.
It is their businesses.
And they're going to have, they're going to get a hard time from China and they're going to lose a lot of money if they start taking principles.
It all comes down to ethics.
This whole thing, and I hate to always kind of revert back to simple, very easily understandable truth, but you can find your enemies and your friends very simply by what you value and what you love.
And if what you value and what you love is short-term pleasure kicks and a lot of cash from people who hate you, then that's where you're going to have your, that's going to be your non-negotiable.
For us, our non-negotiable is beauty, truth, wonder, family, children, country, nation, home, not just wire transfers from the Wuhan Institute of Neurology.
Ethics vs. Bureaucratic Language 00:06:07
Speaking of which, this email right here, and we're going to keep on exploring it.
By the way, get Alex's book, Breaking the News, Buy 10, Buy 15, Give them to all your friends, family, and Father's Day.
We still believe in fathers.
We're going to keep on getting into this.
So here's what we discovered: over the course of 24 hours, again, if I was writing for Netflix, this would be like the most interesting short documentary, but Netflix is not going to go after Dr. Anthony Fauci anytime soon.
If anyone wants to get a best-selling documentary, these two pieces of paper would be fast.
Not even, how about a docudrama?
How many times have they done that?
They did the James Comey one.
So after a lot of examination of these emails, there's just the most interesting thing that shows that Dr. Fauci received some information that he feared, lied about it publicly, and then probably sent Mr. Wolf to go cover it up.
Now, if you don't know who Mr. Wolf is, you should go watch Pulp Fiction.
Mr. Wolf is a man.
He's a fixer.
He's a fixer.
It's well said.
Actually took place in Los Angeles.
Yeah.
Now, how great is the film Pulp Fiction?
I love it.
I've seen it a thousand times and I'll see it a thousand more.
Yeah, well, be there quicker than two shakes of a lamb's tail.
Right, Mr. Gordon?
So there's a pulp fiction reference for almost everything.
So here's what happens.
Dr. Fauci, who evidently doesn't even do his own research, sent what looks to be an attachment from the Chinese or from overseas health authorities to his team, Jeremy and Christian.
Kristen then responds on Friday evening saying, whoa, this looks engineered.
It's not even hard to see.
She says, so one has to, no one has to look really closely just to see that it's engineered.
It's an easy deal.
And we find that it's inconsistent with expectations of evolutionary theory.
Fauci doesn't respond to that email immediately.
He does, though, write a separate email two hours later in the middle of the night, subject line, all caps, important.
And he has three attachments, the same attachments he just sent to Christian.
He says, Hugh, now hear this language.
This is tough language for a bureaucrat, right?
It is essential that we speak this morning on a Saturday morning.
Bureaucrats don't work on the weekends unless there's something to cover up.
Keep your cell phone on, period.
I have a conference call at 7.45 a.m. with Azar.
Read this paper as well as the email that I will forward to you now.
He probably forward Christian's email.
We're going to dive deeper.
Where she says, it's not hard to see that it's engineered.
Then he says the ultimate Mr. Wolf statement.
You will have tasks today that must be done.
I'm not going to work like a really dark way.
Then at 1.47 a.m. Hugh responds, Hugh Auchenkloss, otherwise known as Mr. Wolf.
The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause, which means that this happened while we were funding them, Dr. Fauci.
Not sure what this means since Emily is so sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework.
They're debating whether or not their exposure is here.
And then Fauci responds, okay, stay tuned.
Then later in Saturday, about 24 hours later, he says, thanks, Christian.
Talk soon on the call.
So the question for any Republican senator that wishes to find the truth is, what tasks did you give Hugh Auchenkloss on the morning of Saturday that warranted a 1232 a.m. email with the subject line important?
What tasks did you give him over a weekend?
What was that?
Who did he call?
Who did he meet with?
Did he destroy any documents?
Why were you so vague where he said it's essential?
Keep your cell phone on.
What was so essential about that morning when he told the country there's nothing to worry about?
Subject line caps important.
Strong language for a bureaucrat.
Now, obviously, this actually opens more questions than it answers, but anyone that thinks critically or rationally knows this.
He was told by his scientists, Christian G. Anderson, this was made in a lab.
Then he sends an important email to his number one lieutenant.
And yet he tells the public for an entire year that this was not made in a laboratory.
This was through natural function.
And then he warmly is emailing with Chinese scientists all throughout the sprint.
And then he's condemning Ron DeSantis for not shutting down the country.
Did Dr. Fauci see this as a gateway to shut down the country?
Did he see this as an opportunity to have mass vaccinations?
Did he see this by somebody else whisper in his ear, say, hey, we can get mail and voting through this?
Play it out.
And don't blame China because that will help Trump.
These are just questions, but that's what we do here.
We ask questions.
But I really want to know what tasks today, that's what he said on a Saturday, Dr. Fauci told Mr. Wolf, you will have tasks today that must be done.
The emails of Dr. Fauci keep coming out.
He'll be put out to pasture soon and the machine will go on and Biden will be soon after that.
Because the one thing is they don't like, they don't like their revolutionaries to be exposed.
They like to take them off the chessboard.
Alex, we don't have a lot of time left.
But we do have an event tonight.
Fauci is on Team Pangolin.
He was really rooting for the Pangolin.
He did not want it to be that.
He's on the Pangolin team.
Biden was on the Pangolin team.
The corporations are on the Pangolin team because they don't want to have to hold China accountable.
The only one who was on Team Lab was people who actually care about the science, care about where it came from.
And actually want to hold China accountable.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email us your thoughts, freedom at charliekirk.com.
And if you want to get involved with Turning PointUSA, go to tpusa.com.
If you'd like to support our program, go to charliekirk.com slash support.
Thank you so much for listening.
God bless.
Export Selection